Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] libgsl0ldbl, pd-l2ork
Am 25.04.2016 um 00:53 schrieb Kaj Ailomaa: On Mon, Apr 25, 2016, at 12:00 AM, Gerhard Lang wrote: Compilation of pd-l2ork-x86_64-20160227.deb from git works out of the box, but installation gives erros: missing libgsl0ldbl. Tried to install libgsl0ldbl_1.16+dfsg-4_amd64.deb faild by incompatibility with libgsl2. Any suggestions? Cudos for your great work, I cherish ubuntustudio since 7.04 Best regards Gerhard I've had problems with pd-l2ork installations myself, and it is mainly because of bad packaging. Probably the package is only installable on certain Ubuntu releases. You should inform the packagers about this problem, and specifically let them know on which release you are unable to install it, and hopefully they can fix it soon. Packagers are informed. The last release ubuntustudio 16.04 is affected, in 14.04 it works. That's unless you are willing to find the fix by looking at the problematic dependencies, and see if you can use installable dependencies (like libgsl2) just as well, and then rebuild the package with the fixes to the packaging. Not just a problem of my willing but of my abilities, need guiding hands ;) TX Gerhard -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
[ubuntu-studio-devel] libgsl0ldbl, pd-l2ork
Compilation of pd-l2ork-x86_64-20160227.deb from git works out of the box, but installation gives erros: missing libgsl0ldbl. Tried to install libgsl0ldbl_1.16+dfsg-4_amd64.deb faild by incompatibility with libgsl2. Any suggestions? Cudos for your great work, I cherish ubuntustudio since 7.04 Best regards Gerhard -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: /etc/init.d/rtirq status
Is the following entry in your /etc/default/grub? GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=threadirqs in kernels 2.8 you can activate rtirq with this boot option. Am 26.11.2011 22:21, schrieb Len Ovens: On Sat, November 26, 2011 12:23 pm, Scott Lavender wrote: scott@oneiric-studio:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/rtirq status sudo /etc/init.d/rtirq status [sudo] password for len: PID CLS RTPRIO NI PRI %CPU STAT COMMAND 3 TS - 0 19 0.0 Sksoftirqd/0 9 TS - 0 19 0.0 Sksoftirqd/1 Huh? what did I do wrong? -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Last call for Oneiric seeds
Audacitie's cooperation with with jack is disgraceful. But indeed, for it's capabilities I see no comparable linux alternative. So I vote for retaining Gerhard Am 16.08.2011 09:02, schrieb David Henningsson: On 08/15/2011 03:38 PM, Scott Lavender wrote: On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:50 AM, David Henningsson david.hennings...@canonical.com mailto:david.hennings...@canonical.com wrote: Hmm, seeds and that is not my area of expertise, but I seem to be missing audacity? -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. http://launchpad.net/~diwic http://launchpad.net/%7Ediwic -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.__ubuntu.com mailto:Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/__mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-__studio-devel https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel David, Audacity was consciously removed from the seeds. I would infer that you believe it should included. May I ask why so? Well, the last time this was up for debate, you asked me to write down a use case or workflow, and so I did, see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Workflows#Simple_recording_of_concert.2C_conversation_etc -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
irq priority for firewire device
Hi, would it be possible to make something like rtirq working in a full preempt and noticks-disabled vanilla kernel without rt-patching? As far as I can see adjusting IRQ priorities seems to be essential for firewire-audio as long as firewire's IRQ-priority is subordinated at the low end by default, and if this could be changed in a user friendly way I'd see no more need for rt-patching kernels. I compared all kernel mods for audio live performance and recording in practice, and the only feature I really miss in non-rt-kernels is this rtirq thing. But I'm no coder and need guiding hands for understanding deeper kernel and os matters, so please bear with me if this idea should be foolish, misplaced or redundant/obsolete. Best regards Gerhard -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
