Re: Last call (was Natty and RT Kernel)

2010-10-05 Thread Luke Yelavich
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 01:27:02AM EST, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
 Hi,
 
 If you would want help in kernel stuff for Ubuntu Studio please reply
 to these questions:
 
 Which are kernels on you are interested in? The -rt, -lowlatency or -realtime?
 Which kernels you use on per day basis (so you can provide at least
 test and feedback)?

Of course I'd prefer realtime/rt, however the truth of the matter is that 
keeping up with patches, and keeping the kernel versions in sync for any one 
Ubuntu release is very difficult. For this reason, I'd favour the lowlatency 
kernel, as it would be easier to maintain, given its only configuration 
changes, and would be easier to get into Ubuntu, and maintain it, keeping in 
sync with the Ubuntu release kernel version.

 How do you would want help (test, packaging, upstream relation, Ubuntu
 relation, Studio relation and so on)?

I'm happy to help maintain the low latency kernel, i.e using the Ubuntu release 
kernel git tree as a base, and making our own changes on top, and rebasing on 
the Ubuntu kernel for fixes. Can help get it into universe, and maintain it 
there.

 Which Ubuntu releases do you would want see well supported for
 that/those kernels? Every releases or only LTS?

With the low latency kernel, I would be happy to support it for every Ubuntu 
release where it is in the archive.

Luke

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Last call (was Natty and RT Kernel)

2010-10-05 Thread Alessio Igor Bogani
Laurent,

2010/10/4 laurent.bellegarde laurent.bellega...@free.fr:
 Which are kernels on you are interested in? The -rt, -lowlatency or 
 -realtime?
  Real time for audio, is there de difference beetween the three proposals ?

-lowlatency == -generic + more aggressive low latency kernel configuration
It can offers all things that Ubuntu offer with -generic so -backport
modules, video closed drivers and so on. It is very solid and oriented
to soft users. Trade-off between low latency and power consumption.

-rt == -generic + plus PREEMPT_RT patchset (this is the realtime Linux)
It would want offer the same but require a lot of works. it would want
be aligned with -generic version but it can't be able. It isn't very
solid and it is oriented to hard users only. Power consumption is a
secondary concern.

-realtime == vanilla (kernel.org) + plus PREEMPT_RT patchset (this is
the realtime Linux)
It don't be interested neither to be aligned with -generic kernel nor
be compatible with all closed video rivers shipped (and worked) with
Ubuntu. It don't provide -backport drivers. it is very stable and it
is oriented to hard users only. Power consumption is a secondary
concern.

Ciao,
Alessio

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Last call (was Natty and RT Kernel)

2010-10-05 Thread Alessio Igor Bogani
David,

2010/10/5 David Henningsson david.hennings...@canonical.com:
[...]
 great that you want to manage these kernels!

I have always managed -rt kernels in Ubuntu since Feisty Until
Maverick where I have gave up for personal reasons.

 I'm mostly curious about -lowlatency, but unfortunately I haven't got around
 to test it. I think -preempt is a server kernel? Could you also say that
 -lowlatency is the desktop version of -preempt?

I don't know much about -preempt. A low latency kernel in server
context make little sense to me at least.

 Is there a difference between -rt and -realtime, except that your -realtime
 seems more updated than -rt? Do you think we should replace the official
 linux-rt, with your linux-realtime?

Few minutes ago I replied to Laurent about that.

 closely until now, so I'd also like to ask you - do you feel you have the
 support you need from the kernel-team's side for maintaining these kernels?

Really I don't understand what you mean with feel.
In any case I avoid to reply on this answer because I don't want start a flame.

[...]
 I think we need to have it for every release, to get the best possible
 testing and quality of these kernels. If that's possible?

The time of one-man-kernel-made is finished. So if people want the
real time kernel they should help.

 Please reply only if you want help.

 Just to clarify, did you mean if you need help (you help me) or if you
 want to help (I help you) ?

I don't need help unless you want offer me a serious job. Real time
kernel need help.

All -rt kernels have always worked well on my old laptop also the
infamous Intrepid and Jaunty releases.

Ciao,
Alessio

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Last call (was Natty and RT Kernel)

2010-10-04 Thread Erik Rasmussen
Alessio,

*Which are kernels on you are interested in?  *-*rt *
*Which kernels you use on per day basis (so you can provide at least test
and feedback)?  -rt*
I use the *-rt kernel on a daily basis* for both multimedia work and
non-multimedia work, on my laptop, and it is very reliable for me and I
never get xruns in Ardour with it.

I (and probably many others on this list) do not have a good grasp of who is
doing what in regards to Ubuntu Studio, but I'd like to understand more.

I'd like to learn more about what is involved with getting an -rt kernel
available for Ubuntu Studio and I'd be willing to help.

*How do you want to help (test, packaging, upstream relation, Ubuntu
relation, Studio relation and so on)?  Test*
Not sure what the *relation items mean, but if pointed to some educational
materials, perhaps I can help with other things as well.

*Which Ubuntu releases do you would want see well supported for that/those
kernels? Every releases or only LTS?  Preferably every release.*

Alessio, what you wrote at
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/RealTimeKernel
is very helpful information.  Do you have any advice on where I can learn
more so that I can more effectively help?
*
*-Erik

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 09:27, Alessio Igor Bogani abog...@ubuntu.comwrote:

 Hi,

 If you would want help in kernel stuff for Ubuntu Studio please reply
 to these questions:

 Which are kernels on you are interested in? The -rt, -lowlatency or
 -realtime?
 Which kernels you use on per day basis (so you can provide at least
 test and feedback)?
 How do you would want help (test, packaging, upstream relation, Ubuntu
 relation, Studio relation and so on)?
 Which Ubuntu releases do you would want see well supported for
 that/those kernels? Every releases or only LTS?

 Please reply only if you want help.

 Thanks

 Ciao,
 Alessio

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Last call (was Natty and RT Kernel)

2010-10-04 Thread Alessio Igor Bogani
Hi Erik,

2010/10/4 Erik Rasmussen mailfore...@gmail.com:
[...]

Could you subscribe -devel mailing list and provide your feedback on:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2010-October/002648.html,
please?

Thanks!

Ciao,
Alessio

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Last call (was Natty and RT Kernel)

2010-10-04 Thread laurent.bellegarde
Le 04/10/2010 16:27, Alessio Igor Bogani a écrit :
 Hi,

 If you would want help in kernel stuff for Ubuntu Studio please reply
 to these questions:

 Which are kernels on you are interested in? The -rt, -lowlatency or -realtime?


Real time for audio, is there de difference beetween the three proposals ?

 Which kernels you use on per day basis (so you can provide at least
 test and feedback)?

RT for multimedia, audio and video editing, RT for non-multimedia work

 How do you would want help (test, packaging, upstream relation, Ubuntu
 relation, Studio relation and so on)?

testing, advertising, conference, demonstration to large public

 Which Ubuntu releases do you would want see well supported for
 that/those kernels? Every releases or only LTS?


in priority LTS, because as we are working in improvement of video 
editing tools/documentation, only LTS has an enough large life to 
develop/improve...

 Please reply only if you want help.

 Thanks

 Ciao,
 Alessio


Laurent,
lprod.org, France

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users