[ubuntu-uk] Removing Evolution

2010-07-01 Thread ByteSoup

Hi All,

I removed evolution a while ago using the software center, but I noticed 
today doing an upgrade that its still updating 
evolution-data-server-common what is this package and what is it used 
for? Synaptic describes it like this

/
The data server, called Evolution Data Server is responsible for managing
calendar and addressbook information.

This package contains the architecture independent files needed
by the evolution-data-server package.

/Can this be removed? If so why didnt the software center remove it?

Thanks -Mark
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Removing Evolution

2010-07-01 Thread John Stevenson
On 1 July 2010 09:23, ByteSoup bytes...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi All,

 I removed evolution a while ago using the software center, but I noticed
 today doing an upgrade that its still updating
 evolution-data-server-common what is this package and what is it used for?
 Synaptic describes it like this
 *
 The data server, called Evolution Data Server is responsible for managing
 calendar and addressbook information.

 This package contains the architecture independent files needed
 by the evolution-data-server package.

 *Can this be removed? If so why didnt the software center remove it?

 Thanks -Mark

 Hello Mark,
I also removed evolution but kept the evolution-data-server-common package
as I noticed it had a lot of Gnome dependencies.  For now I have just left
it installed.

-- 
John Stevenson
Lean Agile Consultant / Coach
jr0cket.com  |  leanagilemachine.com
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Removing Evolution

2010-07-01 Thread Simon Greenwood
On 1 July 2010 09:23, ByteSoup bytes...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi All,

 I removed evolution a while ago using the software center, but I noticed
 today doing an upgrade that its still updating
 evolution-data-server-common what is this package and what is it used for?
 Synaptic describes it like this
 *
 The data server, called Evolution Data Server is responsible for managing
 calendar and addressbook information.

 This package contains the architecture independent files needed
 by the evolution-data-server package.

 *Can this be removed? If so why didnt the software center remove it?


It does what it says on the tin - provides address book and calendar
services to the Gnome desktop, which are accessed through Evolution but are
independent of it. It wouldn't be removed by Software Center as that is
mostly used for desktop applications. Someone might be able to give a better
view of where it sits in the Gnome architecture but I would be very careful
about choosing to remove it as it's one of those things that has a lot of
potential dependencies.

s/

-- 
Save BBC 6 Music http://www.love6music.com
My CV: http://bit.ly/sfgreenwood_cv
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/simonfgreenwood
Twitter: @sfgreenwood
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Removing Evolution

2010-07-01 Thread Alan Pope
On 1 July 2010 09:23, ByteSoup bytes...@gmail.com wrote:
 This package contains the architecture independent files needed
 by the evolution-data-server package.

 Can this be removed? If so why didnt the software center remove it?


You could try and remove it but other things (panel applets for
example) depend on it, so they might be removed too. That's why
Software Centre didn't remove it. Personally I'd leave it in.

Cheers,
Al.

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Speech Recognition

2010-07-01 Thread Roy Jamison
I had a look at that but it looked very complicated, and I don't think
it has a frontend for recognition/training. If it had that, it might
work well enough for end-users. :)

Teej

On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 06:55 +0100, Alan Bell wrote:
 this project seems quite active
 
 http://cmusphinx.sourceforge.net/
 
 and has packages for Ubuntu 10.04 in a ppa
 
 I have not tried it yet, but it would be interesting to see how well it
 works for people.
 
 Alan.
 



-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] Parital Dist-upgrade?

2010-07-01 Thread Matthew Macdonald-Wallace
Hi all,

Myself and a number of colleagues have performed a partial dist  
upgrade this morning, having been prompted to do so in Lucid.

Unfortunately this appears to have broken quite a few things including  
some of the packages that we use (remmina is the key one and is  
business critical for us)

Has anyone else had issues?

Matt
-- 
Matthew Macdonald-Wallace
matt...@truthisfreedom.org.uk
http://www.truthisfreedom.org.uk/

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Parital Dist-upgrade?

2010-07-01 Thread Ronnie Tucker
I recently uninstalled PulseAudio to get Skype working properly and the 
latest updates are trying to reinstall PulseAudio and some other bits, 
luckily I managed to notice PA in the list of updates and only install 
the recommended updates, not the partial distribution upgrade.

*phew!*


On 01/07/10 10:30, Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote:
 Hi all,

 Myself and a number of colleagues have performed a partial dist
 upgrade this morning, having been prompted to do so in Lucid.

 Unfortunately this appears to have broken quite a few things including
 some of the packages that we use (remmina is the key one and is
 business critical for us)

 Has anyone else had issues?

 Matt


-- 
*Ronnie Tucker*

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] devon and cornwall Lug reminder

2010-07-01 Thread Paul Sutton
Just to remind people that the devon and cornwall linux user group
meeting is on Saturday - details below in signature.

Paul
-- 
Next Paignton meeting - Saturday 3rd July 2010 - 3pm Lighthouse, Paignton,
Next Holsworthy Meeting -  Saturday July 17th @ The White Hart, Holsworthy.

SOFTWARE FREEDOM DAY 2010
SATURDAY 18th SEPTEMBER 2010  - LIGHTHOUSE, PAIGNTON




-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] Lucid Lynx wifi not working

2010-07-01 Thread daveg
 Message: 7
 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:20:16 +0100
 From: Daniel Case danielcas...@googlemail.com
 Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] 10.04 Wireless Toshiba Portege PP041E
 To: UK Ubuntu Talk ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
 Message-ID:
   aanlktiluol4bfkzn2hglip5b1j9-ln3fbj8lvk5jx...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 Hiya Dave
 Have you checked the restricted drivers? You can also use lspci and
repost
 to let us know what wifi card you have in there.

 You may also want to re-title this, as google has declared it spam for
me...and not many people check there spam boxes

 Dan

 On 28 June 2010 20:20, da...@boavon.plus.com wrote:

 Completed fresh 10.04 install on this little laptop, after some
months(years?) successful running of 8.04.  Managed to overcome the
display problem with a little edit of xorg.conf but cannot get wireless
running.
 It worked fine on 8.04 and still manages ok on on the XP partition.  I
have a very vague memory that I had to overcome display probs and
wireless
 probs on 8.04
 My memory was just ok for the display issues - but for the life of me I
cannot recall what I did (if anything) to get wireless going.  I have done
 the usual searches but frankly there is more garbage and red herrings
each
 and every day.
 I would welcome some help or pointing in the right direction.  I can
supply some outputs if reqd, but you will need to lead me gently. Many thanks
 DaveG

Hiya Dan and others

Message header changed following advice re potential spam.

Dont know what is meant by restricted drivers.  My other post provided
lspci output revealing I think a
00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557/8/9/0/1 Ethernet Pro
100 (rev 0d)
Google search results for this looked promising initially but have proved
to be many red herrings or unintelligible to me.

Here is output from ifconfig -a

Ignore the wlan0 entry - that refers to a USB wireless stick I had
knocking around - but needed elsewhere.  I think its the eth1 I need to
work.  The MAC address certainly matches the router and my expectations.

eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:00:39:3f:46:a5
  UP BROADCAST MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)

eth1  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:02:2d:6a:a2:d1
  UP BROADCAST MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
  Interrupt:11 Base address:0x100

irda0 Link encap:IrLAP  HWaddr 00:00:00:00
  NOARP  MTU:2048  Metric:1
  RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:8
  RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
  Interrupt:7 Base address:0x2f8

loLink encap:Local Loopback
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
  inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
  UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
  RX packets:12 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:12 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:720 (720.0 B)  TX bytes:720 (720.0 B)

pan0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 66:8a:46:1b:42:0f
  BROADCAST MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)

wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0f:cb:c0:fe:cd
  inet addr:192.168.0.8  Bcast:192.168.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  inet6 addr: fe80::20f:cbff:fec0:fecd/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:5132 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:3659 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:2746797 (2.7 MB)  TX bytes:675609 (675.6 KB)


My /etc/network/interfaces looks like this
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback

My output from sudo lshw -C Network is as follows:-
 *-network
   description: Ethernet interface
   product: 82557/8/9/0/1 Ethernet Pro 100
   vendor: Intel Corporation
   physical id: a
   bus info: p...@:00:0a.0
   logical name: eth0
   version: 0d
   serial: 00:00:39:3f:46:a5
   size: 10MB/s
   capacity: 100MB/s
   width: 32 bits
   clock: 33MHz
   capabilities: pm bus_master cap_list ethernet physical tp mii 10bt
10bt-fd 100bt 100bt-fd autonegotiation
   configuration: autonegotiation=on broadcast=yes driver=e100
driverversion=3.5.24-k2-NAPI duplex=half firmware=N/A 

[ubuntu-uk] devon and cornwall lug meet saturday

2010-07-01 Thread Paul Sutton
Hi

Just to remind anyone interested the next devon and cornwall linux user
group meet is

Next Paignton meeting - Saturday 3rd July 2010 - 3pm Lighthouse, 36
Esplanade Road, Paignton,


-- 




-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu guest in Virtual Box lost networking

2010-07-01 Thread David King
UPDATE:

I was very busy and did not get round to viewing your online info, I 
will try to read it some time (thanks for posting).
But, when I went into VirtualBox and ran the Ubuntu 10.04 virtual 
machine again, it worked with the normal wired ethernet connection and 
its 2 arrows logo showing again. When it was not working, it was showing 
what I presume to be the wifi logo, even though I have no wifi hardware 
on this PC.

David




Tyler J. Wagner wrote:
 On Friday 25 June 2010 08:34:29 David King wrote:
   
 I run Ubuntu 9.04 64-bit on my PC, on which I run Virtual Box 3.2.4. In
 that I have been running an Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit guest. Mostly it has
 been okay, but recently it started to randomly lose its network
 connection, and now today it cannot get a network connection at all.
 

 I have a similar setup, but prefer to use the host's routing directly rather 
 than the NAT function of Virtualbox. My guide, which is still valid for 
 Virtualbox 3.2.4, is here:

 http://www.tolaris.com/2009/03/05/using-host-networking-and-nat-with-
 virtualbox/

 Tyler

   

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/