[ubuntu-uk] Documentation control software!

2011-06-06 Thread javadayaz
Hi,

Does anyone know of any opensource (read free) software that can be be used
for documentation control.

This software needs to be able to :

Be able to interact with outlook  to send emails for reminders
have a notification system for outstanding tasks.
Be able to populate information into a standard format letter
Be able to produce statistical reports graphs etc!

Would be a bonus if it worked in windows as well as Ubuntu?


-- 

Regards

Javad
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] Rating software in software centre

2011-06-06 Thread Andrés Muñiz Piniella
Hello,

Do any of you use the rating system in the ubuntu software centre?

I was able to rate many apps but was unable to rate Gwyddion.

Is there any reason for this? Could you try it?

Would you go through the effort of saying it also affects you here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/792017


PS: thanks for the ASUS ubuntu response. true, speed seems to be the
least of it's problems.

-- 
Andrés Muñiz-Piniella

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] asus ubuntu

2011-06-06 Thread Andrés Muñiz Piniella
TONY
Please tell me how you get on with the 13hr battery life. The laptop
we have at home goes by 8hrs but only if the ASUS resource saving mode
is on. I seem to recall that things like video watching where affected
in this mode.


-- Forwarded message --
From: Tony Pursell a...@princeswalk.fsnet.co.uk
To: ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:38:21 +0100
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] asus ubuntu
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 18:37 +0100, alan c wrote:
 On 05/06/11 18:33, Andres wrote:
  Not that I like W7 but it is quite quick to boot up i timed 30-45
  seconds on some laptops when it came out in john lewis. The
  problem (imho) is that you'll need antivirus. Even if it's the free
  windows essentials one it still slows down.

 Even if W7 was faster than Ubuntu, I would still have a lot of reasons
 to want to avoid it.


You can all relax, I am now dual booting Ubuntu 11.04 on my Eee PC
1015PEM, with Ubuntu as the default.

I cannot see myself booting into W7 very often - don't really know why I
kept it.

Tony


-- 
Andrés Muñiz-Piniella

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Rating software in software centre

2011-06-06 Thread Dave Morley
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 13:48 +0100, Andrés Muñiz Piniella wrote:
 Hello,
 
 Do any of you use the rating system in the ubuntu software centre?
 
 I was able to rate many apps but was unable to rate Gwyddion.
 
 Is there any reason for this? Could you try it?
 
 Would you go through the effort of saying it also affects you here:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/792017
 
 
 PS: thanks for the ASUS ubuntu response. true, speed seems to be the
 least of it's problems.
 
 -- 
 Andrés Muñiz-Piniella
 
Thank you for bring this bug to my attention.

Ratings and reviews should work on any application you have installed,
it doesn't do package checking of any sort I don't believe.

There is however a daily limit of reviews to try and limit bot - api
attacks spamming the service to the point of unuse.  It maybe that you
hit your limit but you should of had an error saying that you couldn't
send at that time please try again latter iirc.
-- 
Seek That Thy Might Know

http://www.davmor2.co.uk


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu on android.

2011-06-06 Thread Dave Hanson
Does anyone know of an emulator type application which could run native
Ubuntu programs on my Samsung galaxy s2, running android? Perhaps even a way
to dual boot it to run the desktop edition or maybe meego?

Dave
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu on android.

2011-06-06 Thread Tyler J. Wagner
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 14:12 +0100, Dave Hanson wrote:
 Does anyone know of an emulator type application which could run
 native Ubuntu programs on my Samsung galaxy s2, running android?
 Perhaps even a way to dual boot it to run the desktop edition or maybe
 meego?

No such thing exists. The closest possibilities are:

1. Port the Ubuntu ARM release to the S2 hardware. Depending on your
definition of fun, that will not be fun.

2. Use a VNC client on the S2 to connect to a normal Ubuntu desktop.

Regards,
Tyler

-- 
I respect you too much to respect your ridiculous ideas.
   -- Johann Hari


-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] SMB Share - Fstab

2011-06-06 Thread Chris Rowson
Hi there folks,

I'm having a stupid day today and would appreciate a sanity check!

I have a line like this in my fstab file //mywindowsserver/share
/home/myuser/mount cifs
credentials=/home/myuser/smb/credentials,dir_mode=0700,file_mode=0700,uid=1000
0 0

As I understand it, when this remote NTFS SMB share is mounted, the
files and folders mounted on it will have 0700 permissions, will be
owned by UID 1000 (from the perspective of my Linux system) and nobody
else on the system (except for root of course) will be able to access
them.

I am right aren't I?!

Chris

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu on android.

2011-06-06 Thread Simon Greenwood
On 6 June 2011 14:12, Dave Hanson d...@hansonforensics.co.uk wrote:

 Does anyone know of an emulator type application which could run native
 Ubuntu programs on my Samsung galaxy s2, running android? Perhaps even a way
 to dual boot it to run the desktop edition or maybe meego?



XDA hackers have apparently got Ubuntu,or at least a modern Gnome-based
distribution running on the HTC Desire HD as here:
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/05/install-ubuntu-on-the-htc-desire-hd/ but
it isn't easy. What applications do you want to run and do they have an
equivalent on Android?

s/
-- 
Twitter: @sfgreenwood
Is this your sanderling?
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu on android.

2011-06-06 Thread Tyler J. Wagner
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 14:16 +0100, Tyler J. Wagner wrote:
 No such thing exists. The closest possibilities are:

Oh sure. And now even a casual web search turns up several hacked up
phones running Ubuntu. Madness. :)

Tyler

-- 
The map is not the territory.
   -- Alfred Korzybski


-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu on android.

2011-06-06 Thread Dave Hanson
Thanks Tyler.
On Jun 6, 2011 2:16 PM, Tyler J. Wagner ty...@tolaris.com wrote:
 On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 14:12 +0100, Dave Hanson wrote:
 Does anyone know of an emulator type application which could run
 native Ubuntu programs on my Samsung galaxy s2, running android?
 Perhaps even a way to dual boot it to run the desktop edition or maybe
 meego?

 No such thing exists. The closest possibilities are:

 1. Port the Ubuntu ARM release to the S2 hardware. Depending on your
 definition of fun, that will not be fun.

 2. Use a VNC client on the S2 to connect to a normal Ubuntu desktop.

 Regards,
 Tyler

 --
 I respect you too much to respect your ridiculous ideas.
 -- Johann Hari


 --
 ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu on android.

2011-06-06 Thread Grant Sewell
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Tyler J. Wagner ty...@tolaris.com wrote:
 On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 14:12 +0100, Dave Hanson wrote:
 Does anyone know of an emulator type application which could run
 native Ubuntu programs on my Samsung galaxy s2, running android?
 Perhaps even a way to dual boot it to run the desktop edition or maybe
 meego?

 No such thing exists. The closest possibilities are:

 1. Port the Ubuntu ARM release to the S2 hardware. Depending on your
 definition of fun, that will not be fun.

 2. Use a VNC client on the S2 to connect to a normal Ubuntu desktop.

There are a number of systems around where you can install an ARM
Ubuntu inside a chroot environment, run it with a VNC server as it's
primary X output and then connect to it using an Android VNC client
application.  It is not a particularly fast method but it works.

Grant.

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] unity gimp

2011-06-06 Thread gazz


On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 20:39 +0100, George Tripp wrote:
 From: John Stevenson j...@jr0cket.com
 Move the mouse between the Gimp menu and the indicators on the panel
 and press the middle mouse button (or left/right buttons together).
 This cycles through the windows open on the workspace.
 
 Thanks John (and everyone else who replied) - this seems to have the
 desired effect.
 
 George
 
 

Unity is just too much like hard work IMHO! Thank God, apparently GNOME
3 is implemented in Oneiric so it'll be possible just to install GNOME.
I'll get the alpha and see how this goes soon . . . I'll give Unity
another go but, really, so far it's really not working for me :(

Paula
attachment: face-sad.png-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] unity gimp

2011-06-06 Thread Avi Greenbury

gazz wrote:

Unity is just too much like hard work IMHO! Thank God, apparently GNOME
3 is implemented in Oneiric so it'll be possible just to install GNOME.


I'm intrigued by this. I've so far found that Unity breaks far fewer of 
my assumptions and habits than Gnome3 does. The biggie with Gnome 3 for 
is the workspace management, but the common criticisms apply to each - 
neither has a wonderfully fast or easy menu and neither has much in the 
way of configuration options.



I'll get the alpha and see how this goes soon . . . I'll give Unity
another go but, really, so far it's really not working for me :(


Ah yeah, I've been going back-and-forth for a bit - I spend just long 
enough with one to forget all the niggly bits that irritated me about 
the other and switch back.


I suspect that once I've 'fixed' the workspaces in Gnome3 I'll stick 
with it, but I'm still having trouble seeing the benefit of either over 
Gnome 2.


--
Avi

--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] unity gimp

2011-06-06 Thread gazz


On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 15:50 +0100, Avi Greenbury wrote:

 gazz wrote:
  Unity is just too much like hard work IMHO! Thank God, apparently GNOME
  3 is implemented in Oneiric so it'll be possible just to install GNOME.
 
 I'm intrigued by this. I've so far found that Unity breaks far fewer of 
 my assumptions and habits than Gnome3 does. The biggie with Gnome 3 for 
 is the workspace management, but the common criticisms apply to each - 
 neither has a wonderfully fast or easy menu and neither has much in the 
 way of configuration options.
 
  I'll get the alpha and see how this goes soon . . . I'll give Unity
  another go but, really, so far it's really not working for me :(
 
 Ah yeah, I've been going back-and-forth for a bit - I spend just long 
 enough with one to forget all the niggly bits that irritated me about 
 the other and switch back.
 
 I suspect that once I've 'fixed' the workspaces in Gnome3 I'll stick 
 with it, but I'm still having trouble seeing the benefit of either over 
 Gnome 2.
 
 -- 
 Avi
 

Ah, dunno, haven't actually looked at Gnome 3 yet . . . if it's as bad
as Unity - eeek! 

Paula
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] unity gimp

2011-06-06 Thread scoundrel50a

On 06/06/11 15:57, gazz wrote:



On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 15:50 +0100, Avi Greenbury wrote:

gazz wrote:
  Unity is just too much like hard work IMHO! Thank God, apparently GNOME
  3 is implemented in Oneiric so it'll be possible just to install GNOME.

I'm intrigued by this. I've so far found that Unity breaks far fewer of
my assumptions and habits than Gnome3 does. The biggie with Gnome 3 for
is the workspace management, but the common criticisms apply to each -
neither has a wonderfully fast or easy menu and neither has much in the
way of configuration options.

  I'll get the alpha and see how this goes soon . . . I'll give Unity
  another go but, really, so far it's really not working for me :(

Ah yeah, I've been going back-and-forth for a bit - I spend just long
enough with one to forget all the niggly bits that irritated me about
the other and switch back.

I suspect that once I've 'fixed' the workspaces in Gnome3 I'll stick
with it, but I'm still having trouble seeing the benefit of either over
Gnome 2.

--
Avi

Ah, dunno, haven't actually looked at Gnome 3 yet . . . if it's as bad 
as Unity - eeek!


Paula 


I switched to lxde on my netbook, even though its the only computer I 
have that works with 11.04. I am working with Unity, but not liking it 
much...
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Rating software in software centre

2011-06-06 Thread Andrés Muñiz Piniella
*


There is however a daily limit of reviews to try and limit bot - api
attacks spamming the service to the point of unuse.  It maybe that you
hit your limit but you should of had an error saying that you couldn't
send at that time please try again latter iirc.

***

Hi,
It was the first thing I wanted to Rate. I couldn't so I went and
rated Inkscape and GIMP. I then tried again and it wouldn't rate. I
only rated about 3 apps tops.

Shutdown, let it rest for a day and tried again but still would not
let me rate.

Would you mind trying to rate it?

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] Devon and Cornwall Linux user group meeting - show of hands

2011-06-06 Thread Paul Sutton
Hi

Could I have a show of hands for the meeting on Saturday please


Saturday 11th June 2011 (SECOND SATURDAY)

Shoreline Bar + Bistro

Paignton Seafront

14:30 to 17:00

thanks

Paul



-- 

Paul Sutton Cert SLPS (Open)
http://www.zleap.net



-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] BBC Click

2011-06-06 Thread Paul Tansom
I don't know how many people watch Click on the BBC News channel, but I thought
I'd note that they had a piece on the Raspberry Pi on the last one (over the
weekend), with a mention of Ubuntu as part of a piece on the lack of decent IT
education in schools and the need to do it better - i.e. programming and more
in depth knowledge rather than just how to use MS Office.

It is available online at http://bbc.co.uk/click and for the moment is the top
item.

-- 
Paul Tansom | Aptanet Ltd. | http://www.aptanet.com/ | 023 9238 0001
==
Registered in England  |  Company No: 4905028  |  Registered Office:
Crawford House, Hambledon Road, Denmead, Waterlooville, Hants, PO7 6NU

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] BBC Click

2011-06-06 Thread J Fernyhough
On 6 June 2011 17:57, Paul Tansom p...@aptanet.com wrote:
 I don't know how many people watch Click on the BBC News channel, but I 
 thought
 I'd note that they had a piece on the Raspberry Pi on the last one (over the
 weekend), with a mention of Ubuntu as part of a piece on the lack of decent IT
 education in schools and the need to do it better - i.e. programming and more
 in depth knowledge rather than just how to use MS Office.

 It is available online at http://bbc.co.uk/click and for the moment is the top
 item.


Great sentiment, never going to happen.

Firstly, the vast majority of teachers don't have the skills of
knowledge to be able to teach anything other than office skills - and
even then most can't even do that properly! For example, you'll be
hard pressed to find an ICT teacher who has a science, engineering or
computing background - most are business or management, or even PE.
When one particular example won't touch on image editing (despite it
being in the scheme of work) because they'd have to learn how to use
Photoshop Elements what hope is there of getting them to do any sort
of programming?

Secondly, the majority of children don't care about how a computer
works (any more than they care how a car works) - they just want to
use it. Granted, there are always some who do, and there are always
extra-curricular clubs and GCSE and A-level Computing for them.
However, the same children who are interested in how a computer works
also tend to be those who take Maths and Sciences at A-level;
Computing doesn't have the same appeal.

Essentially, it comes down to the fact that teaching difficult stuff
is difficult, and most teachers aren't up to it. To teach it in an
interesting and engaging way is difficult, and to keep up with the
pace of change relies on them having an interest in the topic, and
again, most don't. The number of teachers who can do it, and are
interested in it, are outnumbered and out-gunned.

Jonathon

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Documentation control software!

2011-06-06 Thread John Stevenson
On 6 June 2011 04:08, javadayaz javada...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 Does anyone know of any opensource (read free) software that can be be used
 for documentation control.


Some suggestions I have are:

Alfresco - http://www.alfresco.com/
Liferay - http://www.liferay.com/

I dont really understand the value of your requirements so have not concept
if these products are relevent, except that they are available as open
source products.

Thank you
-- 
http://uk.linkedin.com/in/johnstevenson247John
Stevensonhttp://uk.linkedin.com/in/johnstevenson247| Public
calendar http://john.jr0cket.co.uk/public-calendar |
@JR0ckethttp://http//twitter.com/#%21/JR0cket
 | @AnAmbassadorUK https://twitter.com/#%21/AnAmbassadorUK | Tech
websiteshttp://jr0cket.co.uk/
| Tech blog http://jr0cket.com/ | Lean Agile
Bloghttp://leanagilemachine.com/
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] BBC Click

2011-06-06 Thread Avi Greenbury
J Fernyhough wrote:
 
 Firstly, the vast majority of teachers don't have the skills of
 knowledge to be able to teach anything other than office skills

This is precisely what's *wanted* in order that IT teachers can teach
IT. At the moment, the IT taught in school is an introduction to using
computers in the other subjects - processing statistics in a
spreadsheet, writing essays in a word processor, editing images, that
sort of thing.

What needs to happen before IT can possibly be expected to start
teaching IT is for these basic skills to be taught in the same places
as the non-computer-related basic skills. Word processors should be
covered in English lessons, spreadsheets in maths or a science, image
processing in art, search engines in history and that sort of thing.

The problem here is that the curriculum is not really about anything in
particular except being a curriculum. We can't work out whether school
is about learning for learning's sake, preparing students for work,
preparing students for life in general or something else entirely. It
still feels heavily geared towards staffing the governance of
colonies...

A larger problem is that a lack of understanding of computers is a
complete non-issue. Many people genuinely believe it is more important
to know the date of VE day than what a firewall does.

 When one particular example won't touch on image editing (despite it
 being in the scheme of work) because they'd have to learn how to use
 Photoshop Elements what hope is there of getting them to do any sort
 of programming?

Why should an IT teacher be teaching art anyway?

 Secondly, the majority of children don't care about how a computer
 works (any more than they care how a car works)

I suspect they're not overly bothered about trigonometry or the
differences between plant cells and animal cells. The point of a
curriculum isn't to be interesting.

 Essentially, it comes down to the fact that teaching difficult stuff
 is difficult, and most teachers aren't up to it.

This is untrue in many fields that aren't IT. We seem to manage to
provide children with science and maths and $difficultSubject teachers
The problem is that the IT curriculum is more about teaching kids how
to do other subjects with computers than it is about computers.

It's roughly akin to using English literature lessons to teach
students the meanings of their History course texts.

-- 
Avi.


-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] BBC Click

2011-06-06 Thread Grant Sewell
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:13:29 +0100
J Fernyhough wrote:

 On 6 June 2011 17:57, Paul Tansom p...@aptanet.com wrote:
  I don't know how many people watch Click on the BBC News channel,
  but I thought I'd note that they had a piece on the Raspberry Pi on
  the last one (over the weekend), with a mention of Ubuntu as part
  of a piece on the lack of decent IT education in schools and the
  need to do it better - i.e. programming and more in depth knowledge
  rather than just how to use MS Office.
 
  It is available online at http://bbc.co.uk/click and for the moment
  is the top item.
 
 
 Great sentiment, never going to happen.
 
 Firstly, the vast majority of teachers don't have the skills of
 knowledge to be able to teach anything other than office skills - and
 even then most can't even do that properly! For example, you'll be
 hard pressed to find an ICT teacher who has a science, engineering or
 computing background - most are business or management, or even PE.
 When one particular example won't touch on image editing (despite it
 being in the scheme of work) because they'd have to learn how to use
 Photoshop Elements what hope is there of getting them to do any sort
 of programming?
 
 Secondly, the majority of children don't care about how a computer
 works (any more than they care how a car works) - they just want to
 use it. Granted, there are always some who do, and there are always
 extra-curricular clubs and GCSE and A-level Computing for them.
 However, the same children who are interested in how a computer works
 also tend to be those who take Maths and Sciences at A-level;
 Computing doesn't have the same appeal.
 
 Essentially, it comes down to the fact that teaching difficult stuff
 is difficult, and most teachers aren't up to it. To teach it in an
 interesting and engaging way is difficult, and to keep up with the
 pace of change relies on them having an interest in the topic, and
 again, most don't. The number of teachers who can do it, and are
 interested in it, are outnumbered and out-gunned.
 
 Jonathon

Unfortunately I would have to agree with most of your sentiments there,
Jonathon.  I teach IT from Level 1 through to Level 3 (GCSEs are
deemed Level 2) at a college of FE and in my experience the majority
of IT teachers at secondary schools do the bare minimum they can as
they really don't understand it themselves, since they're not IT
specialists.

I think the problem is primarily 2-fold.  Firstly, and this is a *HUGE*
generalisation, people inclined towards IT will either find teaching or
the idea of teaching off-putting as it will most likely involve
interacting with, and being in a custodial role of youngsters (who are
usually quite a difficult bunch to work with) or they will find the
attractiveness of working in higher-paid environments more enticing
(let's be honest - teaching isn't one of the better paid environments
out there).

Secondly, on the other side of the coin, a lot of people who are in a
position where they teach IT at secondary schools are in that position
not because they are particularly adept with computers and not even
because they are more adept than their colleagues, but because they
didn't have enough teaching hours on their timetable to warrant a
full-time position and the school needed to put someone up as an IT
teacher.

I find myself in a rather privileged position.  I am a self-confessed
geek.  I find most aspects of computers interesting and I am happy to
spend my spare time reading and researching topics that grab my
attention.  Yes, I have my specialisms but I frequently find that my
knowledge of my non-specialist topics is greater than some of my peers
who teach them... because I find them fascinating and so read, read and
read some more about the topics.  I also happen to enjoy teaching.

Grant.

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] BBC Click

2011-06-06 Thread J Fernyhough
I agree with much of what you say - I'm going to respond inline for
the discussion.

On 6 June 2011 18:42, Avi Greenbury li...@avi.co wrote:
 J Fernyhough wrote:

 Firstly, the vast majority of teachers don't have the skills of
 knowledge to be able to teach anything other than office skills

 This is precisely what's *wanted* in order that IT teachers can teach
 IT. At the moment, the IT taught in school is an introduction to using
 computers in the other subjects - processing statistics in a
 spreadsheet, writing essays in a word processor, editing images, that
 sort of thing.

 What needs to happen before IT can possibly be expected to start
 teaching IT is for these basic skills to be taught in the same places
 as the non-computer-related basic skills. Word processors should be
 covered in English lessons, spreadsheets in maths or a science, image
 processing in art, search engines in history and that sort of thing.


Yes, and yes. And in many instances this is exactly what happens, and
exactly why a school might not value ICT as a discrete subject. If the
skills are being taught cross-curricular, then why do we need IT
lessons and IT teachers? If IT teachers are teaching what's being
taught by other staff, why do they need specific skills?

However, for this to happen what would be required is an increase in
basic IT skills of all teachers, and that would require a change in
their mindset.

I've read a lot about project-based (or thematic) learning, especially
in charter schools in California and New York. This has promise, but
getting past the current teaching mindset is nigh-on impossible.

 The problem here is that the curriculum is not really about anything in
 particular except being a curriculum. We can't work out whether school
 is about learning for learning's sake, preparing students for work,
 preparing students for life in general or something else entirely. It
 still feels heavily geared towards staffing the governance of
 colonies...

 A larger problem is that a lack of understanding of computers is a
 complete non-issue. Many people genuinely believe it is more important
 to know the date of VE day than what a firewall does.


Agreed. It's a bit pants.

 When one particular example won't touch on image editing (despite it
 being in the scheme of work) because they'd have to learn how to use
 Photoshop Elements what hope is there of getting them to do any sort
 of programming?

 Why should an IT teacher be teaching art anyway?


I would respond that ICT is a convergence subject. It's not just about
computers and how they work. Why teach about podcasting
(Music/Media/English), logo design (Graphics, Art) or animation (Art,
Drama), or website design (Media, Graphics), or spreadsheet formulae
(Maths, Business/Economics), or data analysis (Maths, Science), or...

The point of the image editing was faked photos (think Iran missile
launch photo from a few months back). Again, though, this is about
information bias and validity - and this again could be taught in
pretty much every other subject.

 Secondly, the majority of children don't care about how a computer
 works (any more than they care how a car works)

 I suspect they're not overly bothered about trigonometry or the
 differences between plant cells and animal cells. The point of a
 curriculum isn't to be interesting.


No, but it helps, and it should normally provide some context. It
helps most, though, when the teacher is interested in the curriculum
(I should highlight that this is possibly the most important thing in
teaching).

 Essentially, it comes down to the fact that teaching difficult stuff
 is difficult, and most teachers aren't up to it.

 This is untrue in many fields that aren't IT. We seem to manage to
 provide children with science and maths and $difficultSubject teachers

While I accept your point, there's a shortage of Maths and Science
teachers. Recruitment of Maths teachers is incredibly difficult, e.g.
school having to offer extra incentives.

 The problem is that the IT curriculum is more about teaching kids how
 to do other subjects with computers than it is about computers.


To teach about computers would require teachers who know about and are
interested in computers - but then again, what is computers?

 It's roughly akin to using English literature lessons to teach
 students the meanings of their History course texts.

That's a cross-curricular approach, and what you were after in the
first paragraph. ;)


 --
 Avi.


Jonathon

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] (no subject)

2011-06-06 Thread Bod Soutar
http://nmp.megabyet.net/indexz42X.php

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] BBC Click

2011-06-06 Thread Alan Bell
I have heard with my own ears teachers complaining about applications 
having a learning curve. . . why would anyone want to use something in 
school that didn't have a learning curve I wonder.


--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] BBC Click

2011-06-06 Thread scralion...@gmail.com
That is a distinctly good question, I have been using computers, in some shape 
or form, since I was a young child, and without giving my age, that is a long 
time.
And learn something new everyday, so my learning curve could be considered as 
being decades.
Pmt
-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Alan Bell alanb...@ubuntu.com wrote:

I have heard with my own ears teachers complaining about applications 
having a learning curve. . . why would anyone want to use something in 
school that didn't have a learning curve I wonder.

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Rating software in software centre

2011-06-06 Thread richard
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 16:50 +0100, Andrés Muñiz Piniella wrote:
 *
 
 
 There is however a daily limit of reviews to try and limit bot - api
 attacks spamming the service to the point of unuse.  It maybe that you
 hit your limit but you should of had an error saying that you couldn't
 send at that time please try again latter iirc.
 
 ***
 
 Hi,
 It was the first thing I wanted to Rate. I couldn't so I went and
 rated Inkscape and GIMP. I then tried again and it wouldn't rate. I
 only rated about 3 apps tops.
 
 Shutdown, let it rest for a day and tried again but still would not
 let me rate.
 
 Would you mind trying to rate it?
 
works for me but I was the first review so perhaps it got fixed.


-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] BBC Click

2011-06-06 Thread Phill Whiteside
Hiyas,

I'm only on just above 'nodding' terms with edubuntu, but have seen that
they do have a good support group for the newcomers to it. As it is teachers
talking to teachers, they do have a far better understanding of the
specifics for classroom / computer labs than we could ever have. It is an
excellent variant of the ubuntu family and one that is under appreciated. I
actually do so love it when the 'kids' come on and ask how to bypass the
security on it Gotta love those kids!

For those teachers a liitle afraid and want a bit of hand holding, being
able to get over the fear of talking to a 'geek' is possibly a way forward
for some (not for all), to extend their computer resources in the current
economic climate.

With the 'small' plug in computers which are designed to be 'played' with.
There does seem to be a loss of the possibility that there are some
youngsters who want more than 'shoot them up games' and I know lubuntu is
being used to put new life into old kit, the F/OSS environment of which
Ubuntu is one of the most actively and well known, the cause is not lost.

Maybe Ubuntu-UK would like to propose 'adopt a school / college' - It would
certainly get the LoCo about 2,000,000 brownie points for 'all the good
things we do' for re-election of the UK LoCo to remain official?

just a thought...

Regards,

Phill.

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:15 PM, scralion...@gmail.com scralion...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 That is a distinctly good question, I have been using computers, in some
 shape or form, since I was a young child, and without giving my age, that is
 a long time.
 And learn something new everyday, so my learning curve could be considered
 as being decades.
 Pmt
 --
 Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.


 Alan Bell alanb...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 I have heard with my own ears teachers complaining about applications
 having a learning curve. . . why would anyone want to use something in
 school that didn't have a learning curve I wonder.

 --
 ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


 --
 ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/




-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] BBC Click

2011-06-06 Thread J Fernyhough
On 6 June 2011 21:07, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 Maybe Ubuntu-UK would like to propose 'adopt a school / college' - It would
 certainly get the LoCo about 2,000,000 brownie points for 'all the good
 things we do' for re-election of the UK LoCo to remain official?
 just a thought...
 Regards,
 Phill.

Oo, now I like this idea. I'm quite happy to be a point of contact for
local schools, run training sessions etc., and if there's enough
interest the LoCo might even be able to influence educational policy!

Jonathon

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] BBC Click

2011-06-06 Thread Grant Sewell
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:19:25 +0100
J Fernyhough wrote:

 On 6 June 2011 21:07, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
  Maybe Ubuntu-UK would like to propose 'adopt a school / college' -
  It would certainly get the LoCo about 2,000,000 brownie points for
  'all the good things we do' for re-election of the UK LoCo to
  remain official? just a thought...
  Regards,
  Phill.
 
 Oo, now I like this idea. I'm quite happy to be a point of contact for
 local schools, run training sessions etc., and if there's enough
 interest the LoCo might even be able to influence educational policy!
 
 Jonathon

I like this idea too.  Let us not forget there is a more generalised
group regarding Free Software in Education - www.dfey.org

I would be happy to be a point of contact for schools in my area
(Plymouth).

Grant.

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] BBC Click

2011-06-06 Thread Phill Whiteside
As some one who pops lubuntu onto old kit, I am certainly up for it in my
local area. My problem being that I do get dragged across England for months
at a time in my job as 'Holding Mananger' for bars (pubs). If I were to
start one here in Warrington, I'd need to know there was some one to take
over when I get sent to, say, Carlisle. And for setting one up there, the
same would apply.

food for thought, but if they can do '1 laptop per kid', I'm sure we can do
'1 school / college per lubuntu-uk person'. This is the 1st time I've raised
the issue, as I'm used to oh, we'd love to, but it's too complicated sort
of answers...

My apologies if I have put the cat amongst the pidgeons, but now and again
we do have to move out of our 'comfort' zone. (Besides, as a wholly Free
Advertising project, we will get more exposure in the media).

I've got a few rough ideas in my mind, I am sure the fantastic people like
Alan Bell et all, would love to have a go at this. If one of our ubuntu LoCo
team people can get Canonical managers shipped to australia to support his
resurrection of their LoCo - Nothing is impossible :)

Regards,

~Phill.

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:19 PM, J Fernyhough j.fernyho...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 6 June 2011 21:07, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
  Maybe Ubuntu-UK would like to propose 'adopt a school / college' - It
 would
  certainly get the LoCo about 2,000,000 brownie points for 'all the good
  things we do' for re-election of the UK LoCo to remain official?
  just a thought...
  Regards,
  Phill.

 Oo, now I like this idea. I'm quite happy to be a point of contact for
 local schools, run training sessions etc., and if there's enough
 interest the LoCo might even be able to influence educational policy!

 Jonathon

 --
 ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/




-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] BBC Click

2011-06-06 Thread Paul Tansom
** J Fernyhough j.fernyho...@gmail.com [2011-06-06 19:22]:
 I agree with much of what you say - I'm going to respond inline for
 the discussion.
 
 On 6 June 2011 18:42, Avi Greenbury li...@avi.co wrote:
  J Fernyhough wrote:
 
  Firstly, the vast majority of teachers don't have the skills of
  knowledge to be able to teach anything other than office skills
 
  This is precisely what's *wanted* in order that IT teachers can teach
  IT. At the moment, the IT taught in school is an introduction to using
  computers in the other subjects - processing statistics in a
  spreadsheet, writing essays in a word processor, editing images, that
  sort of thing.
 
  What needs to happen before IT can possibly be expected to start
  teaching IT is for these basic skills to be taught in the same places
  as the non-computer-related basic skills. Word processors should be
  covered in English lessons, spreadsheets in maths or a science, image
  processing in art, search engines in history and that sort of thing.
 
 Yes, and yes. And in many instances this is exactly what happens, and
 exactly why a school might not value ICT as a discrete subject. If the
 skills are being taught cross-curricular, then why do we need IT
 lessons and IT teachers? If IT teachers are teaching what's being
 taught by other staff, why do they need specific skills?
 
 However, for this to happen what would be required is an increase in
 basic IT skills of all teachers, and that would require a change in
 their mindset.

I think I'm going to disagree here. ICT is a tool that is cross curricular, and
as such (and given that it is so significant and ubiquitous) deserves special
attention. To be slightly flippant, you don't expect a history teacher to teach
English because it is required to read the books ;) That said, some packages
are more specific, so I would expect an art teacher to have a solid
understanding of graphics packages in order to teach the use of that particular
artistic tool just as much as charcoal, watercolour or clay - the level of the
study may dictate whether it is a single teacher or (perhaps subject to size of
school as well) there are several with differing specialisms within the subject
area. What is missing with ICT is the depth of study, and I think that a good
chunk of what is taught as ICT is more akin to business studies.

snip
  When one particular example won't touch on image editing (despite it
  being in the scheme of work) because they'd have to learn how to use
  Photoshop Elements what hope is there of getting them to do any sort
  of programming?
 
  Why should an IT teacher be teaching art anyway?

See above!

snip
  Secondly, the majority of children don't care about how a computer
  works (any more than they care how a car works)
 
  I suspect they're not overly bothered about trigonometry or the
  differences between plant cells and animal cells. The point of a
  curriculum isn't to be interesting.
 
 No, but it helps, and it should normally provide some context. It
 helps most, though, when the teacher is interested in the curriculum
 (I should highlight that this is possibly the most important thing in
 teaching).

Whilst the majority may not care how a car works, they are at least taught the
principles and then some go on to study further. The curriculum defines what
knowledge is required, and it is the job of the teacher to make it interesting.

  Essentially, it comes down to the fact that teaching difficult stuff
  is difficult, and most teachers aren't up to it.
 
  This is untrue in many fields that aren't IT. We seem to manage to
  provide children with science and maths and $difficultSubject teachers
 
 While I accept your point, there's a shortage of Maths and Science
 teachers. Recruitment of Maths teachers is incredibly difficult, e.g.
 school having to offer extra incentives.

A reasonable part of the shortage of maths and science teachers is the
attraction of other jobs that require those skills and pay better, coupled
perhaps with the fact that the nature of the disciplines lead to a smaller
percentage of those following it being interested in standing in front of a
class teaching it (I may be generalising or stereotyping here!). With ICT you
have the added disincentive that the curriculum does not appear to cover much
that people truly interested in the subject consider important or interesting,
borne out by the fact that industry is crying out for skills that are not
being taught.

  The problem is that the IT curriculum is more about teaching kids how
  to do other subjects with computers than it is about computers.
 
 To teach about computers would require teachers who know about and are
 interested in computers - but then again, what is computers?

Chicken and egg I suspect here. When I was at school it was all about the
history of computers, logic and programming, and although these days I would
expect the balance to change and other areas to be brought in, it would be nice
to have