Re: [ubuntu-uk] 64-bit vs 32-bit

2012-11-21 Thread Stuart Ward
Hi

Using the 64bit should give a significant speed improvement as the code
will be complied to use a lot of the optimized op codes. The 32bit versions
of software are usually compiled to a base instruction set so that work on
all machines. but as Intel has introduced new opcodes as the platform has
evolved. There are applications that test for these and will use these if
available, but most software is just complied to a base 32 architecture.

Stuart

-- Stuart Ward M +44 7782325143


On 15 November 2012 12:19, Scrase, Eddie escrase...@wentworthlabs.comwrote:

 I switched to 64-bit with 12.04, and have not noticed anything at all.


 -Original Message-
 From: ubuntu-uk-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com
 [mailto:ubuntu-uk-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com] On Behalf Of
 ubuntu-uk-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com
 Sent: 15 November 2012 12:00 pm
 To: ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
 Subject: 64-bit vs 32-bit

 Hi
 I'm thinking about upgrading to Xubuntu 12.10. It will be a fresh
 install. So far I've always gone for the 32-bit version and had next to
 no problems, either with the OS or applications. Conscious of the need
 to keep up with the times, I'm considering 64-bit next time. Are there
 any real advantages or would I be unlikely to notice any significant
 difference?
 Regards
 Nige


 --
 ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] 64-bit vs 32-bit

2012-11-15 Thread Scrase, Eddie
I switched to 64-bit with 12.04, and have not noticed anything at all.


-Original Message-
From: ubuntu-uk-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com
[mailto:ubuntu-uk-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com] On Behalf Of
ubuntu-uk-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com
Sent: 15 November 2012 12:00 pm
To: ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: 64-bit vs 32-bit

Hi
I'm thinking about upgrading to Xubuntu 12.10. It will be a fresh
install. So far I've always gone for the 32-bit version and had next to
no problems, either with the OS or applications. Conscious of the need
to keep up with the times, I'm considering 64-bit next time. Are there
any real advantages or would I be unlikely to notice any significant
difference?
Regards
Nige


-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] 64-bit vs 32-bit

2012-11-14 Thread Nigel Verity
Hi
I'm thinking about upgrading to Xubuntu 12.10. It will be a fresh install. So 
far I've always gone for the 32-bit version and had next to no problems, either 
with the OS or applications. Conscious of the need to keep up with the times, 
I'm considering 64-bit next time. Are there any real advantages or would I be 
unlikely to notice any significant difference?
Regards
Nige  -- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] 64-bit vs 32-bit

2012-11-14 Thread Tyler J. Wagner
I have run 64-bit on the desktop for almost 5 years now. Even 32-bit apps
like Skype run just fine now, thanks to multi-arch. Just use 64-bit, and
install what you want from the package manager. It'll work.

Tyler

On 2012-11-14 16:40, Nigel Verity wrote:
 Hi
 
 I'm thinking about upgrading to Xubuntu 12.10. It will be a fresh install.
 So far I've always gone for the 32-bit version and had next to no problems,
 either with the OS or applications. Conscious of the need to keep up with
 the times, I'm considering 64-bit next time. Are there any real advantages
 or would I be unlikely to notice any significant difference?
 
 Regards
 
 Nige
 
 

-- 
[...] freedom is kind of a hobby with me, and I have disposable income
that I'll spend to find out how to get people more of it.
   -- Penn Jillette

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] 64-bit vs 32-bit

2012-11-14 Thread Rob Beard

On 14/11/12 15:40, Nigel Verity wrote:

Hi

I'm thinking about upgrading to Xubuntu 12.10. It will be a fresh
install. So far I've always gone for the 32-bit version and had next to
no problems, either with the OS or applications. Conscious of the need
to keep up with the times, I'm considering 64-bit next time. Are there
any real advantages or would I be unlikely to notice any significant
difference?

Regards

Nige




I've typically gone for a 32-Bit distro too in the past but have 
recently made the switch to 64-Bit.  Not had any issues with it, just 
seems to work just as well as 32-Bit distros.


IIRC if you want to run processes with more than 4GB memory then you 
need a 64-Bit OS, but even with 4GB Ram you can use all the memory if 
you enable the kernel with PAE support.


I've also found that Virtualbox seems to run a little better on a 64-Bit 
OS too, even with only 2GB Ram.


Rob

--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] 64-bit vs 32-bit

2012-11-14 Thread Avi Greenbury
Nigel Verity wrote:
 I'm thinking about upgrading to Xubuntu 12.10. It will be a fresh install. So
 far I've always gone for the 32-bit version and had next to no problems, 
 either
 with the OS or applications. Conscious of the need to keep up with the times,
 I'm considering 64-bit next time. Are there any real advantages or would I be
 unlikely to notice any significant difference?

If you've a 64-bit CPU there's no reason to run a 32-bit kernel. You'd
likely be hard-pressed to tell the difference between them, though.


-- 
Avi

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] 64-bit vs 32-bit

2012-11-14 Thread Tyler J. Wagner
On 2012-11-14 17:02, Rob Beard wrote:
 IIRC if you want to run processes with more than 4GB memory then you need a
 64-Bit OS, but even with 4GB Ram you can use all the memory if you enable
 the kernel with PAE support.

With PAE you can use the RAM in total. However, each process is still
limited to the maximum addressable 2^32 bytes. So if you want to say, let
GIMP open a 4 GB image, you cannot do it on a 32-bit kernel without swapping.

Not that it would be advisable to do so.

Regards,
Tyler

-- 
You may not like Grandma's Thanksgiving turkey. It may be overcooked
and dry - and her stuffing salty and studded with rubbery pellets of
giblet you find unpalatable in the extreme. You may not even like turkey
at all. But it's Grandma's turkey. And you are in Grandma's house. So
shut the fuck up and eat it.
   -- Anthony Bourdain, on the Grandma Rule for travellers

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/