Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu-uk graphics

2007-03-29 Thread Matthew East
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 09:21 +0100, Chris Rowson wrote:
  Not really a turnaround. The trademark policy is quite clear on
  modifying the logo.
 
  http://www.ubuntu.com/aboutus/trademarkpolicy
 
  Those have been the same since at least 2005, probably longer.
 
 
 In which case nowt has changed then ;-)
 
 So there should be no problem with submitting modified graphics to
 Canonical for approval :-P

You're not reading any of the links I've posted. At the above link,
under Logo Standards, it explains in detail what Canonical would
prefer you to do in relation to the logo, and that includes not
modifying it except in the ways stipulated. So does Matthew's email that
I linked to earlier in the thread.

However, as we've all said on this thread already, Canonical are quite
nice about the issue in general. These are intended to be guidelines,
which we should follow, rather than some kind of dictatorial stance.

I don't really see how this issue is complicated!!

Matt
-- 
http://www.mdke.org
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF



-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu-uk graphics

2007-03-29 Thread Chris Rowson
Hi Matt,

 However, as we've all said on this thread already, Canonical are quite
 nice about the issue in general. These are intended to be guidelines,
 which we should follow, rather than some kind of dictatorial stance.

 I don't really see how this issue is complicated!!

 Matt

It's not complicated.

I was only confused when you came into discussion with your first post saying:

 So, if redesigning the logo, please follow his guidelines.

It sounded more like a directive than a suggestion, which lead me to
believe that you where instructing me (given content of this thread,
in which I was asking for feedback on a logo I'd created) to stay away
from modifying the logo in the manner in which I had ...

If I was wrong I apologise profusely, although I do remain somewhat
confused as to the point of the entire conversation thus far!

Kind Regards

Chris

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu-uk graphics

2007-03-28 Thread Chris Rowson
 Not really a turnaround. The trademark policy is quite clear on
 modifying the logo.

 http://www.ubuntu.com/aboutus/trademarkpolicy

 Those have been the same since at least 2005, probably longer.


In which case nowt has changed then ;-)

So there should be no problem with submitting modified graphics to
Canonical for approval :-P

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu-uk graphics

2007-03-27 Thread Chris Rowson
Well - feel free to use if for whatever, like I say - it was an
experiment, if you want to submit it as the team logo again (of course
if everyone is in agreement) then feel free, if you don't feel free
;-) - I didn't have a particular function in mind when I created it,
and donate it freely to the team.


Chris

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu-uk graphics

2007-03-27 Thread Matthew East

On Tue, March 27, 2007 1:09 am, Dave Murphy wrote:
 Alan Pope wrote:
 I was under the impression that we can't use a logo derived from the
 Ubuntu one without it getting approval first. We have been through that
 process for the current logo.

 The details are here: http://www.ubuntu.com/aboutus/trademarkpolicy

 In a nutshell, the ubuntu logo - including the circle of friends - are
 a trademark of Canonical and cannot be used or modified without their
 permission. Reading between the lines (IANAL nor do I play one on TV
 etc.) they're not going to be bothered what individuals use as forum
 avatars etc., but if a group want to use it then they should get it
 approved.

 That said, getting our current logo approved was fairly straightforward,
 although we (purposely) didn't stray to far from the original.

Canonical is beginning to understand that customising the logo is in fact
a bad idea and causes the initial logo to lose its power. For example, see
the recent advice from the Ubuntu webmaster for locoteams who customise
the logo -
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/2007-March/001196.html

So, if redesigning the logo, please follow his guidelines.

Matt
-- 
http://www.mdke.org
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF



-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu-uk graphics

2007-03-27 Thread Chris Rowson
On 27/03/07, Chris Rowson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  For example, see
  the recent advice from the Ubuntu webmaster for locoteams who customise
  the logo -
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/2007-March/001196.html
 
  So, if redesigning the logo, please follow his guidelines.
 
  Matt
  --

 Hi Matt -

 If following the guidelines, it looks like we can't customise the logo
 at all! (Well, unless you count changing one small line of text as
 customisation...)

 Chris


Also - when looking at the Demos https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Templates The
two sites showcasing the new theme are still using their own logos
;-)

Chris

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu-uk graphics

2007-03-27 Thread Chris Rowson
 For example, see
 the recent advice from the Ubuntu webmaster for locoteams who customise
 the logo -
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/2007-March/001196.html

 So, if redesigning the logo, please follow his guidelines.

 Matt
 --

Hi Matt -

If following the guidelines, it looks like we can't customise the logo
at all! (Well, unless you count changing one small line of text as
customisation...)

Chris

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu-uk graphics

2007-03-27 Thread Dave Murphy
Chris Rowson wrote:
 Also - when looking at the Demos https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Templates The
 two sites showcasing the new theme are still using their own logos
 ;-)

...and I'm willing to guess (but happy to be proved wrong) that neither 
of those logos are approved...
-- 
Dave Murphy - http://www.schwuk.com


-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu-uk graphics

2007-03-27 Thread Matthew East

On Tue, March 27, 2007 2:55 pm, Dave Murphy wrote:
 Chris Rowson wrote:
 Also - when looking at the Demos https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Templates The
 two sites showcasing the new theme are still using their own logos
 ;-)

 ...and I'm willing to guess (but happy to be proved wrong) that neither
 of those logos are approved...

It's likely that they were approved because Canonical have been quite easy
in the past about this. However Matthew's email shows that they are now
(rightly, in my opinion) looking to have more consistent logos used.

Matt
-- 
http://www.mdke.org
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF



-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu-uk graphics

2007-03-27 Thread Chris Rowson
  It's likely that they were approved because Canonical have been quite easy
 in the past about this. However Matthew's email shows that they are now
 (rightly, in my opinion) looking to have more consistent logos used.

Ah OK - So Canonical doesn't allow derivative works to be made of
their logo anymore.  That's a shame really, as I think it helps foster
links between the community and Canonical.

I don't work for Canonical - neither do most of the other members of
LoCo groups, but I support the work that Canonical does. In my honest
opinion this should at least be reflected in the merging of canonical
imagery with community. Forcing a style is a little unpleasant.

Just my tuppence worth ;-)

Chris

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu-uk graphics

2007-03-27 Thread Tony Arnold
Chris,

Chris Rowson wrote:

 Ah OK - So Canonical doesn't allow derivative works to be made of
 their logo anymore.  That's a shame really, as I think it helps foster
 links between the community and Canonical.
 
 I don't work for Canonical - neither do most of the other members of
 LoCo groups, but I support the work that Canonical does. In my honest
 opinion this should at least be reflected in the merging of canonical
 imagery with community. Forcing a style is a little unpleasant.

Organisations have to be very protective about their trademarks. If they
are allowed to be used freely as is or modified, then they can lose
their trademark status through general usage. The Kleenex company in the
US had this problem many years ago. I think there was a big court case
about it.

Regards,
Tony.
-- 
Tony Arnold, IT Security Coordinator, University of Manchester,
IT Services Division, Kilburn Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL.
T: +44 (0)161 275 6093, F: +44 (0)870 136 1004, M: +44 (0)773 330 0039
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED], H: http://www.man.ac.uk/Tony.Arnold

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu-uk graphics

2007-03-27 Thread Chris Rowson
 Organisations have to be very protective about their trademarks. If they
 are allowed to be used freely as is or modified, then they can lose
 their trademark status through general usage. The Kleenex company in the
 US had this problem many years ago. I think there was a big court case
 about it.

 Regards,
 Tony.

That's fair enough Tony.

I was really commenting about Matt saying:

 Canonical is beginning to understand that customising the logo is in fact
 a bad idea and causes the initial logo to lose its power.

I didn't mean using it without their permission so they loose
trademark status because of general usage.  I was commenting on the
turnaround from granting derivative works to disallowing them if you
see what I mean

Regards

Chris

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu-uk graphics

2007-03-27 Thread Matthew East
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 17:18 +0100, Chris Rowson wrote:
  It's likely that they were approved because Canonical have been quite easy
  in the past about this. However Matthew's email shows that they are now
  (rightly, in my opinion) looking to have more consistent logos used.
 
 Ah OK - So Canonical doesn't allow derivative works to be made of
 their logo anymore.  That's a shame really, as I think it helps foster
 links between the community and Canonical.


No, that's totally the wrong end of the stick (did you read the url I
posted?) - any groups are generally perfectly free to use the logo,
subject to permission being obtained as described on the Trademark
webpage. Such permission is generally granted easily.

However, in his email, the webmaster asked (and it's no more than
asked) to avoid *modifying* the logo. That's very different from
preventing use of the logo.

Matt
-- 
http://www.mdke.org
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF



-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu-uk graphics

2007-03-27 Thread Tony Arnold
Chris,

Chris Rowson wrote:
 Organisations have to be very protective about their trademarks. If they
 are allowed to be used freely as is or modified, then they can lose
 their trademark status through general usage. The Kleenex company in the
 US had this problem many years ago. I think there was a big court case
 about it.

 Regards,
 Tony.
 
 That's fair enough Tony.
 
 I was really commenting about Matt saying:
 
 Canonical is beginning to understand that customising the logo is in fact
 a bad idea and causes the initial logo to lose its power.
 
 I didn't mean using it without their permission so they loose
 trademark status because of general usage.  I was commenting on the
 turnaround from granting derivative works to disallowing them if you
 see what I mean

OK. I think Matt has clarified this in a later posting. It's certainly a
 bit of a turn around. Maybe they got lawyers involved!

Regards,
Tony.
-- 
Tony Arnold, IT Security Coordinator, University of Manchester,
IT Services Division, Kilburn Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL.
T: +44 (0)161 275 6093, F: +44 (0)870 136 1004, M: +44 (0)773 330 0039
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED], H: http://www.man.ac.uk/Tony.Arnold

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu-uk graphics

2007-03-26 Thread Chris Rowson
Hi folks,

I've been trying to get better at using Gimp and Inkscape and have
created some ubuntu-uk artwork. It's a single graphic type jobby
that'd be OK for a forum avatar, desktop icon or whatnot

If anyone likes it, feel free to use it. If anyone has any feedback,
please feel free to offer constructive criticism as I am a gimp and
inkscape noob!!!

http://justuber.com/graphics_and_artwork:ubuntu

Chris

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu-uk graphics

2007-03-26 Thread Tony Arnold


Chris Rowson wrote:
 Hi folks,
 
 I've been trying to get better at using Gimp and Inkscape and have
 created some ubuntu-uk artwork. It's a single graphic type jobby
 that'd be OK for a forum avatar, desktop icon or whatnot
 
 If anyone likes it, feel free to use it. If anyone has any feedback,
 please feel free to offer constructive criticism as I am a gimp and
 inkscape noob!!!
 
 http://justuber.com/graphics_and_artwork:ubuntu

Nice job! Is this meant to replace or complement the existing UK logo as
seen at the top of the UK team Wiki page https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/?

Regards,
Tony.
-- 
Tony Arnold, IT Security Coordinator, University of Manchester,
IT Services Division, Kilburn Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL.
T: +44 (0)161 275 6093, F: +44 (0)870 136 1004, M: +44 (0)773 330 0039
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED], H: http://www.man.ac.uk/Tony.Arnold

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu-uk graphics

2007-03-26 Thread Alan Pope
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 10:43:14PM +0100, Tony Arnold wrote:
 
 
 Chris Rowson wrote:
  Hi folks,
  
  I've been trying to get better at using Gimp and Inkscape and have
  created some ubuntu-uk artwork. It's a single graphic type jobby
  that'd be OK for a forum avatar, desktop icon or whatnot
  
  If anyone likes it, feel free to use it. If anyone has any feedback,
  please feel free to offer constructive criticism as I am a gimp and
  inkscape noob!!!
  
  http://justuber.com/graphics_and_artwork:ubuntu
 
 Nice job! Is this meant to replace or complement the existing UK logo as
 seen at the top of the UK team Wiki page https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/?
 

I was under the impression that we can't use a logo derived from the 
Ubuntu one without it getting approval first. We have been through that 
process for the current logo. 

I am not suggesting we do or don't change the existing logo, just passing 
on the info.

Cheers,
Al.

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/