Re: [VOTE] Release CasEditor-2.2.2-01 as CasEditor-2.2.2-incubating
Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Hello, > > the Cas Editor is now finally ready for release. > > - I finished the testing according to the CasEditor-2.2.2 test plan > http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplancaseditor222.html > > - All issues for release 2.2.2CE are fixed > > The release artifacts are available on people.apache.org at > /home/joern/distributions/CasEditor-2.2.2/01 > > So please cast your vote: > [ ] +1 release candidate CasEditor-2.2.2-01 is ready and can be released > [ ] 0 don't care > [ ] -1 don't release yet, I found some more issues > > Jörn please cancel this vote, so that the status is clear. -- Michael
Re: [VOTE] Release CasEditor-2.2.2-01 as CasEditor-2.2.2-incubating
Ok, I will create a 02 release candidate. Thanks for your review Thilo. Jörn On Jun 20, 2008, at 11:54 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote: Jörn Kottmann wrote: Hello, the Cas Editor is now finally ready for release. - I finished the testing according to the CasEditor-2.2.2 test plan http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplancaseditor222.html - All issues for release 2.2.2CE are fixed The release artifacts are available on people.apache.org at /home/joern/distributions/CasEditor-2.2.2/01 So please cast your vote: [ ] +1 release candidate CasEditor-2.2.2-01 is ready and can be released [ ] 0 don't care [ ] -1 don't release yet, I found some more issues Jörn I checked the distributions and everything seems to be fine except one issue: the binary distribution includes Eclipse and Junit code. This needs to be mentioned in the NOTICE and LICENSE files. So here's what needs to be done: 1) The NOTICE file of the binary distribution needs to include the sentence "This product includes software developed at the Eclipse Foundation (http://.eclipse.org/). 2) The LICENSE file of the binary distribution needs to include a copy of the EPL. 3) The "about" dialog of the CasEditor needs to include the same sentence as the NOTICE file. Does the junit plugin even need to be distributed? Other than that, everything is fine afaict. --Thilo
Re: [VOTE] Release CasEditor-2.2.2-01 as CasEditor-2.2.2-incubating
Jörn Kottmann wrote: Hello, the Cas Editor is now finally ready for release. - I finished the testing according to the CasEditor-2.2.2 test plan http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplancaseditor222.html - All issues for release 2.2.2CE are fixed The release artifacts are available on people.apache.org at /home/joern/distributions/CasEditor-2.2.2/01 So please cast your vote: [ ] +1 release candidate CasEditor-2.2.2-01 is ready and can be released [ ] 0 don't care [ ] -1 don't release yet, I found some more issues Jörn I checked the distributions and everything seems to be fine except one issue: the binary distribution includes Eclipse and Junit code. This needs to be mentioned in the NOTICE and LICENSE files. So here's what needs to be done: 1) The NOTICE file of the binary distribution needs to include the sentence "This product includes software developed at the Eclipse Foundation (http://.eclipse.org/). 2) The LICENSE file of the binary distribution needs to include a copy of the EPL. 3) The "about" dialog of the CasEditor needs to include the same sentence as the NOTICE file. Does the junit plugin even need to be distributed? Other than that, everything is fine afaict. --Thilo
Re: [VOTE] Release CasEditor-2.2.2-01 as CasEditor-2.2.2-incubating
the Cas Editor is now finally ready for release. - I finished the testing according to the CasEditor-2.2.2 test plan http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplancaseditor222.html - All issues for release 2.2.2CE are fixed The release artifacts are available on people.apache.org at /home/joern/distributions/CasEditor-2.2.2/01 So please cast your vote: [ ] +1 release candidate CasEditor-2.2.2-01 is ready and can be released [ ] 0 don't care [ ] -1 don't release yet, I found some more issues +1 Jörn
Re: [VOTE] Release CasEditor-2.2.2-01 as CasEditor-2.2.2-incubating
Jörn Kottmann wrote: >> I think you should also provide a RAT report for your release >> artifacts. This helps on the Incubator >> to get it approved faster. For details about how to generate and >> comment it, please refer to >> http://incubator.apache.org/uima/release.html#Auditing%20The%20Release%20And%20Create%20A%20RAT%20report >> > > Now the rat reports for linux, windows and the src build is also uploaded. > I put in comments for the files which do not contain an AL. > > Can you please review Michael ? > > Thanks, > Jörn Looks good to me. Just one comment to /home/joern/distributions/CasEditor-2.2.2/. I would remove the older directories with a higher build number :-) I think it is a little bit confusing. -- Michael
Re: [VOTE] Release CasEditor-2.2.2-01 as CasEditor-2.2.2-incubating
I think you should also provide a RAT report for your release artifacts. This helps on the Incubator to get it approved faster. For details about how to generate and comment it, please refer to http://incubator.apache.org/uima/release.html#Auditing%20The%20Release%20And%20Create%20A%20RAT%20report Now the rat reports for linux, windows and the src build is also uploaded. I put in comments for the files which do not contain an AL. Can you please review Michael ? Thanks, Jörn
Re: [VOTE] Release CasEditor-2.2.2-01 as CasEditor-2.2.2-incubating
Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Hello, > > the Cas Editor is now finally ready for release. > > - I finished the testing according to the CasEditor-2.2.2 test plan > http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplancaseditor222.html > > - All issues for release 2.2.2CE are fixed > > The release artifacts are available on people.apache.org at > /home/joern/distributions/CasEditor-2.2.2/01 > > So please cast your vote: > [ ] +1 release candidate CasEditor-2.2.2-01 is ready and can be released > [ ] 0 don't care > [ ] -1 don't release yet, I found some more issues > > Jörn +1 I verified: - checksums - signing - source package build - mandatory release artifacts files (LICENSE, NOTICE...) - ReleaseNotes - quick binary package install verification on Windows I think you should also provide a RAT report for your release artifacts. This helps on the Incubator to get it approved faster. For details about how to generate and comment it, please refer to http://incubator.apache.org/uima/release.html#Auditing%20The%20Release%20And%20Create%20A%20RAT%20report -- Michael
Re: [VOTE] Release CasEditor-2.2.2-01 as CasEditor-2.2.2-incubating
Michael Baessler wrote: > Jörn Kottmann wrote: >> Hello, >> >> the Cas Editor is now finally ready for release. >> >> - I finished the testing according to the CasEditor-2.2.2 test plan >> http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplancaseditor222.html >> >> - All issues for release 2.2.2CE are fixed >> >> The release artifacts are available on people.apache.org at >> /home/joern/distributions/CasEditor-2.2.2/01 >> >> So please cast your vote: >> [ ] +1 release candidate CasEditor-2.2.2-01 is ready and can be released >> [ ] 0 don't care >> [ ] -1 don't release yet, I found some more issues >> >> Jörn > > It seems that you are using the wrong format for the MD5 and SHA1 checksum > files. > We learned that during one of the last UIMA release votes on Incubator. > For details, please check: http://markmail.org/message/kckx6sltq3jg2k3j > > How did you generate the checksum files? > > We use a script that is available here: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/build/signRelease.sh > > -- Michael Sorry, just realized that the files are OK and just the publishing of the checksum in my application was not correct... Sorry for that. Checksums are OK. -- Michael
Re: [VOTE] Release CasEditor-2.2.2-01 as CasEditor-2.2.2-incubating
Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Hello, > > the Cas Editor is now finally ready for release. > > - I finished the testing according to the CasEditor-2.2.2 test plan > http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplancaseditor222.html > > - All issues for release 2.2.2CE are fixed > > The release artifacts are available on people.apache.org at > /home/joern/distributions/CasEditor-2.2.2/01 > > So please cast your vote: > [ ] +1 release candidate CasEditor-2.2.2-01 is ready and can be released > [ ] 0 don't care > [ ] -1 don't release yet, I found some more issues > > Jörn It seems that you are using the wrong format for the MD5 and SHA1 checksum files. We learned that during one of the last UIMA release votes on Incubator. For details, please check: http://markmail.org/message/kckx6sltq3jg2k3j How did you generate the checksum files? We use a script that is available here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/build/signRelease.sh -- Michael
