Re: [uknof] Thought for the day: announce the end of IPv4 internet connections by 2026

2020-05-26 Thread Daniel Ankers
On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 01:12, Paul Mansfield 
wrote:

> So is it actually feasible to announce *any* date when IPv6 will be
> the only connectivity offered to the end user?  The thing is that
> without target dates and deadlines, things will drag on indefinitely.
>  I'll admit I wanted to deliberately put up a challenging statement,
> but not to troll, really.  I genuinely want an answer to "is there a
> possible date?".
>
>
The thing about Y2K and 2038 is that they are absolutely fixed dates.  No
amount of arguing or pleading would move them.  On the other hand, if a
flag day for IPv4 shutoff was chosen it would be arbitrary and could, if
needed, be moved.  While the vast majority of the internet is IPv4 first
there will be pressure to move the date (and I believe that pressure will
be too strong to resist), and if people think the date might be moved then
they won't migrate to IPv6.

To me, the next obvious step along the migration path will be people
setting up IPv6-only ISPs which use the savings from not deploying IPv4 to
reduce the cost for their customers.  Not all content is available over
IPv6 yet, but at some point there will be enough that the savings make
using IPv6 only (and losing access to large parts of the internet)
worthwhile - and that will start to put pressure on the IPv4-only content
to move.

Dan


Re: [uknof] Cloud Services

2014-10-12 Thread Daniel Ankers
On 12 October 2014 22:47, Stephen Wilcox steve.wil...@ixreach.com wrote:

 On 12 October 2014 21:57, Oliver Gorwits uk...@gorwits.me.uk wrote:

 On 2014-10-12 21:18, Edward Dore wrote:

 I thought 2014 was the year of big data and the Internet of
 Things? ;-)


 According to this year's hype cycle,

 Cloud Computing: Trough of Disillusionment
 IoT: Peak of Inflated Expectations

 http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2819918

 Take your pick ;-)


 Where does IPv6 sit?


At The Bar of Mailing List Arguments


Re: [uknof] Belfast

2014-09-11 Thread Daniel Ankers
On 10 September 2014 03:18, David Farrell d...@davidfarrell.ie wrote:

 Folks,

 It was absolutely *fantastic* to be part of the last two days in my
 adopted home town. I hope those who made it enjoyed Belfast and the rest.

 Cheers,

 David.


Agreed - big thanks to the UKNOF and ION teams

Dan


Re: [uknof] Belfast

2014-09-11 Thread Daniel Ankers
On 11 September 2014 09:54, Geoff Bennett gbenn...@infinera.com wrote:

 Isn't Britain just mainland Britain?  England, Wales and (for the
 moment) Scotland.


tongue_in_cheek
Are you suggesting that in the event of Scotland gaining independence that
they are going to physically move away from mainland Britain?  That may
create infrastructure challenges which I don't think either campaign has
discussed yet.
/tongue_in_cheek

Dan


Re: [uknof] UK IPv6 Taskforce

2014-09-05 Thread Daniel Ankers
On 5 September 2014 18:22, Neil J. McRae n...@domino.org wrote:

 When
 something in the V6 network breaks in my experience its typically dealt
 with at a slower rate than V4, having dual stack at home I ended up
 turning it off because a bunch of sites that had V6 broke it and then took
 along time to fix it, that¹s just not a scenario I want to unleash on the
 customers I want to serve.


I wonder how long ago it was that you were running dual stack at home?
 I've been running it for several months at home and in our office for a
couple of years without noticing a single issue.  Of course, that could be
down to differences in the way different people use the internet, but it
might be that things have improved.

Regards,
Dan