RE: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds

2005-04-13 Thread Dubin, Elisabeth



I'll be calling the 
police on J. Cass, who has an illegal sod farm in his backyard. It's a 
scandal.


ELISABETH DUBINHillier ARCHITECTUREOne 
South Penn Square, Philadelphia, PA 19107-3502 | T 215 636- | F 215 636-9989 
| hillier.com 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan 
CassSent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 9:10 PMTo: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: 
univcity@list.purple.comSubject: RE: [UC] PM-302.3 
Weeds

It is good to see that the City is finally 
cracking down on all youlay-abouts. Good god --most UC homeowners only have 
about400 square feet of property not covered by the dwelling -- is it 
really that difficult to maintain it properly?

It reminds me of Kyle's lame excuse for why 
he hasn't taken any steps to landscape the vacant lot next to his manse. 
(Remember that one -- "Janie Blackwell said I couldn't do it"!!).

The PIC plants sale is coming up at the end 
of the month-- I suggest that you all get on over there, purchase some plants, 
and do some landscaping at your weed-choked hovels. 

Remember, the crazy old lady next door will 
be watching.
Jonathan A. Cass -Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On 
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 7:32 
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: 
univcity@list.purple.comSubject: Re: [UC] PM-302.3 
Weeds

  
  Yeah right. "Decorative grass". Heh. Heard that one before. What are you 
  raising there, Widyono, Panama Red? Hmm? Little BC Bud? Some decorative 
  Colombian mixed in with the trailing arbutus, and the wisterias, and the 
  travelling bamboos?
  
  Ross Bender
  http://rossbender.org
  
  In a message dated 4/12/2005 5:03:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  I got slapped with this, some decorative grass in the front lawn 
apparentlywas not liked by a neighbor (who still hasn't come clean to 
let me know itwas them who contacted the police to complain, without 
ever complaining to mefirst). *I* got the ticket FOUR MONTHS after 
it was written up. Thetimestamp on the envelope proves it. 
No deal, they wanted their money. Iwasn't about to fight all the 
way to a judge, I'd wasted enough time tryingto reason with the Finance 
department (a.k.a. Collection Agency).
  


Re: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds

2005-04-13 Thread Mario Giorno
Folks,

  This weed citation is foolish. There's no across the board
method for citing such a thing in a way that couldn't be grotesquely
abused by the people making the complaints. There must be hundreds of
residences with at least one weed that may be in excess of 10 inches
at any given time in this city. It's one thing to want to keep
Philadelphia looking clean and orderly, it's another to pelt people
with these poorly regulated statutes that aren't properly and
equitably enforced by the city government. Unless the city appoints
landscaping police, it's foolish to think that you're at the mercy of
a disgruntled neighbor who has an abusive green thumb under which we
are all are pinned.


2 cents

Mario Giorno

On 4/13/05, Dubin, Elisabeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
 I'll be calling the police on J. Cass, who has an illegal sod farm in his
 backyard.  It's a scandal. 
   
   
  ELISABETH DUBIN
 Hillier ARCHITECTURE
 One South Penn Square, Philadelphia, PA 19107-3502 | T 215 636- | F 215
 636-9989 | hillier.com 
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Cass
 Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 9:10 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: univcity@list.purple.com
 Subject: RE: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds
 
  
  
 It is good to see that the City is finally cracking down on all you
 lay-abouts.  Good god -- most UC homeowners only have about 400 square feet
 of property not covered by the dwelling -- is it really that difficult to
 maintain it properly? 
   
 It reminds me of Kyle's lame excuse for why he hasn't taken any steps to
 landscape the vacant lot next to his manse.  (Remember that one -- Janie
 Blackwell said I couldn't do it!!). 
   
 The PIC plants sale is coming up at the end of the month-- I suggest that
 you all get on over there, purchase some plants, and do some landscaping at
 your weed-choked hovels.  
   
 Remember, the crazy old lady next door will be watching. 
 
 Jonathan A. Cass 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 7:32 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: univcity@list.purple.com
 Subject: Re: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds
 
  
  
  
 Yeah right. Decorative grass. Heh. Heard that one before. What are you
 raising there, Widyono, Panama Red? Hmm? Little BC Bud? Some decorative
 Colombian mixed in with the trailing arbutus, and the wisterias, and the
 travelling bamboos? 
   
 Ross Bender 
 http://rossbender.org 
   
 In a message dated 4/12/2005 5:03:45 PM Eastern Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 
 I got slapped with this, some decorative grass in the front lawn apparently
 was not liked by a neighbor (who still hasn't come clean to let me know it
 was them who contacted the police to complain, without ever complaining to
 me
 first).  *I* got the ticket FOUR MONTHS after it was written up.  The
 timestamp on the envelope proves it.  No deal, they wanted their money.  I
 wasn't about to fight all the way to a judge, I'd wasted enough time trying
 to reason with the Finance department (a.k.a. Collection Agency). 



You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
http://www.purple.com/list.html.


Re: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds

2005-04-13 Thread Brian Siano
Mario Giorno wrote:
Folks,
 This weed citation is foolish. There's no across the board
method for citing such a thing in a way that couldn't be grotesquely
abused by the people making the complaints. There must be hundreds of
residences with at least one weed that may be in excess of 10 inches
at any given time in this city. It's one thing to want to keep
Philadelphia looking clean and orderly, it's another to pelt people
with these poorly regulated statutes that aren't properly and
equitably enforced by the city government. Unless the city appoints
landscaping police, it's foolish to think that you're at the mercy of
a disgruntled neighbor who has an abusive green thumb under which we
are all are pinned.
 

Still, such neighbors exist, and the statutes exist, so the potential 
for abuse exists. I can even cite some personal experience: about a year 
after I'd moved into my house, one of my neighbors decided to trim the 
bushes in front of my house by chopping them down to stumps. Without my 
consent, BTW.

They grew back, happily, and although they're not the prettiest 
landscaper's choice in the world, I figure I'll keep'em there just to 
spite Paul Bunyan. But the incident showed me that there were people 
who'd probably be tickled pink to have a city _agency_ act on their 
particular gardening whims.



You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
http://www.purple.com/list.html.


RE: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds

2005-04-12 Thread Kyle Cassidy
Title: RE: [UC] PM-302.3  Weeds





I will say that when I was having problems with my neighbors and their trash, it was matt wolfe who came through. I'd been complaining to my councilwoman off and on for a year with no result, matt got it taken care of the next day.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kirk Wattles
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 4:22 PM
To: UC List
Subject: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds



PHILADELPHIA PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE
SECTION PM-302. EXTERIOR PROPERTY AREAS


PM-302.3 Weeds: All premises and exterior property shall be maintained 
free from weeds or plant growth in excess of 10 inches (254 mm). All 
noxious weeds shall be prohibited. Weeds shall be defined as all 
grasses, annual plants and vegetation, other than trees, shrubs, 
cultivated flowers and gardens.


http://municipalcodes.lexisnexis.com/codes/philadelphia/_DATA/TITLE04/ 
SUBCODE_PM_THE_PHILADELPHIA_PR/SECTION_PM_302_EXTERIOR_PROPER.html





Re: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds

2005-04-12 Thread Dan Widyono
I got slapped with this, some decorative grass in the front lawn apparently
was not liked by a neighbor (who still hasn't come clean to let me know it
was them who contacted the police to complain, without ever complaining to me
first).  *I* got the ticket FOUR MONTHS after it was written up.  The
timestamp on the envelope proves it.  No deal, they wanted their money.  I
wasn't about to fight all the way to a judge, I'd wasted enough time trying
to reason with the Finance department (a.k.a. Collection Agency).

Dan W.

On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 04:26:05PM -0400, Kyle Cassidy wrote:
 I will say that when I was having problems with my neighbors and their
 trash, it was matt wolfe who came through. I'd been complaining to my
 councilwoman off and on for a year with no result, matt got it taken care of
 the next day.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Kirk Wattles
 Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 4:22 PM
 To: UC List
 Subject: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds
 
 
 PHILADELPHIA PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE
 SECTION PM-302. EXTERIOR PROPERTY AREAS
 
 PM-302.3  Weeds: All premises and exterior property shall be maintained  
 free from weeds or plant growth in excess of 10 inches (254 mm). All  
 noxious weeds shall be prohibited. Weeds shall be defined as all  
 grasses, annual plants and vegetation, other than trees, shrubs,  
 cultivated flowers and gardens.
 
 http://municipalcodes.lexisnexis.com/codes/philadelphia/_DATA/TITLE04/ 
 SUBCODE_PM_THE_PHILADELPHIA_PR/SECTION_PM_302_EXTERIOR_PROPER.html

-- 
-- Daniel Widyono --
-- www.widyono.net--
-- www.cis.upenn.edu/~widyono --
-- 

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
http://www.purple.com/list.html.


RE: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds

2005-04-12 Thread Michael Clapper
I too got one of these tickets, as did several of my neighbors.  Not the
neighbor whose front yard is an experiment in ecosystem reversion, i.e.,
see what happens when you do nothing for years.  

The same timing nonsense occurred (written in August, filed in January.)


After much back and forth, I finally got a supervisor at the Finance
Dept who told me that if I appealed, I would win.  There's no reasoning
with any of the folks who answer the phone, although one did inform me
that the only way to avoid a hearing was if I knew someone, and in that
case, he didn't want to know about it.  Charming.  

So, me and the baby are off to court next week, his first experience
with the law.  I hope they go easy on us, maybe give us a donut and urge
us to stick closer to church related activities.  

MC  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Widyono
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 5:02 PM
To: Kyle Cassidy
Cc: 'Kirk Wattles'; UC List
Subject: Re: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds

I got slapped with this, some decorative grass in the front lawn
apparently
was not liked by a neighbor (who still hasn't come clean to let me know
it
was them who contacted the police to complain, without ever complaining
to me
first).  *I* got the ticket FOUR MONTHS after it was written up.  The
timestamp on the envelope proves it.  No deal, they wanted their money.
I
wasn't about to fight all the way to a judge, I'd wasted enough time
trying
to reason with the Finance department (a.k.a. Collection Agency).

Dan W.

On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 04:26:05PM -0400, Kyle Cassidy wrote:
 I will say that when I was having problems with my neighbors and their
 trash, it was matt wolfe who came through. I'd been complaining to my
 councilwoman off and on for a year with no result, matt got it taken
care of
 the next day.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Kirk Wattles
 Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 4:22 PM
 To: UC List
 Subject: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds
 
 
 PHILADELPHIA PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE
 SECTION PM-302. EXTERIOR PROPERTY AREAS
 
 PM-302.3  Weeds: All premises and exterior property shall be
maintained  
 free from weeds or plant growth in excess of 10 inches (254 mm). All  
 noxious weeds shall be prohibited. Weeds shall be defined as all  
 grasses, annual plants and vegetation, other than trees, shrubs,  
 cultivated flowers and gardens.
 
 http://municipalcodes.lexisnexis.com/codes/philadelphia/_DATA/TITLE04/

 SUBCODE_PM_THE_PHILADELPHIA_PR/SECTION_PM_302_EXTERIOR_PROPER.html

-- 
-- Daniel Widyono --
-- www.widyono.net--
-- www.cis.upenn.edu/~widyono --
-- 

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
http://www.purple.com/list.html.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
http://www.purple.com/list.html.


Re: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds

2005-04-12 Thread Benseraglio2



Yeah right. "Decorative grass". Heh. Heard that one before. What are you raising there, Widyono, Panama Red? Hmm? Little BC Bud? Some decorative Colombian mixed in with the trailing arbutus, and the wisterias, and the travelling bamboos?

Ross Bender
http://rossbender.org

In a message dated 4/12/2005 5:03:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I got slapped with this, some decorative grass in the front lawn apparentlywas not liked by a neighbor (who still hasn't come clean to let me know itwas them who contacted the police to complain, without ever complaining to mefirst). *I* got the ticket FOUR MONTHS after it was written up. Thetimestamp on the envelope proves it. No deal, they wanted their money. Iwasn't about to fight all the way to a judge, I'd wasted enough time tryingto reason with the Finance department (a.k.a. Collection Agency).



RE: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds My story.

2005-04-12 Thread Nicole Mcewan
I have an elderly neighbor who has harassed me for several years.
She has interrupted me while I was working on my house to yell at me on 
several occasions, once because a metal trash can full of old furnace debris 
had been left in front of my house by a plumbing contractor. It was too 
heavy to move and they had been promising to come get it for several days.

Over the years, she has never said anything positive about any improvements 
I have made. I have tried to be polite though she is insanely overbearing. 
When we had a house fire she said nothing while other neighbors were quite 
supportive. I am currently having exterior painting done on a property I 
have been working on for two years. It used to be a boarding house populated 
by crackheads and prostitutes. Again she says nothing nice to me. One day 
she yelled that I was dragging her property values down because my privet 
hedge was high. (Keep in mind that privet hedge height is subjective. Some 
people like hedges for privacy.)

On one property my older neighbor and I share a hedge. This neighbor is in 
her sixties. She gets no such critique from Mrs. X regarding the height of 
her hedge.

The last time Mrs X came at me with a tirade was last fall. My husband had 
just broken his back and was getting ready to have surgery.  I could not 
muster any more patience and asked her to remove herself from my property. 
When I received a ticket in February for high weeds I just laughed because I 
knew it was her. She seems to have a lot of time on her hands as many 
elderly people do.

The property in question has no high weeds because two years ago I laid 
weedpaper in the front garden and mulched it and have maintained it since. I 
suppose there is no high hedge citation because it's an aesthetic choice -- 
so weeds is the way they wrote it up. I only hope calling in this absurd 
citation gave Mrs. X a shred of satisfaction and joy in what seems to be a 
dismal and empty old age.

Mrs. X. once yelled something about me making so much money on my property. 
She clearly has no idea how much money it takes to rehab a house or homes 
that have been left derelict for years.

The total irony of the situation is that  Mrs. X. will soon be selling sells 
her property -- one she has owned outright for many years. When it goes for 
$400K or more; it will never occur to her that her profit is partly due to 
people like me -- a younger generation of investors. Our sweat equity and 
financial investment in U-city partially contributed to her windfall. It was 
a gamble that has paid off admittedly, but it was still a risk.

It's clear to me that Mrs. X. is projecting her anger and frustration at 
growing old toward me. She doesn't like high hedges because she keeps hers 
short.  She has no control over the fact that she must leave a neighborhood 
she loves because she is growing too infirm to maintain a giant twin house.  
She can't control me or by extension the block she has called home for much 
of her life.

I wish her only happiness in her new situation and hope I will remember her 
when I get to be her age.

When I got the ticket - I paid it.  Ultimately, it was a small fine to pay 
for the criminal act of being young.

Nicole McEwan
gt;From: quot;Michael Clapperquot; lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;
gt;Reply-To: quot;Michael Clapperquot; lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;
gt;To: quot;'UC List'quot; lt;univcity@list.purple.comgt;
gt;Subject: RE: [UC] PM-302.3  Weeds
gt;Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:06:52 -0400
gt;
gt;I too got one of these tickets, as did several of my neighbors.  Not the
gt;neighbor whose front yard is an experiment in ecosystem reversion, i.e.,
gt;see what happens when you do nothing for years.
gt;
gt;The same timing nonsense occurred (written in August, filed in January.)
gt;
gt;
gt;After much back and forth, I finally got a supervisor at the Finance
gt;Dept who told me that if I appealed, I would win.  There's no reasoning
gt;with any of the folks who answer the phone, although one did inform me
gt;that the only way to avoid a hearing was if I knew someone, and in that
gt;case, he didn't want to know about it.  Charming.
gt;
gt;So, me and the baby are off to court next week, his first experience
gt;with the law.  I hope they go easy on us, maybe give us a donut and urge
gt;us to stick closer to church related activities.
gt;
gt;MC
gt;
gt;-Original Message-
gt;From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt;[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Widyono
gt;Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 5:02 PM
gt;To: Kyle Cassidy
gt;Cc: 'Kirk Wattles'; UC List
gt;Subject: Re: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds
gt;
gt;I got slapped with this, some decorative grass in the front lawn
gt;apparently
gt;was not liked by a neighbor (who still hasn't come clean to let me know
gt;it
gt;was them who contacted the police to complain, without ever complaining
gt;to me
gt;first).  *I* got the ticket FOUR MONTHS after it was written up.  The
gt;timestamp on the envelope proves it.  No deal, they wanted their money

RE: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds

2005-04-12 Thread Jonathan Cass



It is good to see that the City is finally 
cracking down on all youlay-abouts. Good god --most UC homeowners only have 
about400 square feet of property not covered by the dwelling -- is it 
really that difficult to maintain it properly?

It reminds me of Kyle's lame excuse for why 
he hasn't taken any steps to landscape the vacant lot next to his manse. 
(Remember that one -- "Janie Blackwell said I couldn't do it"!!).

The PIC plants sale is coming up at the end 
of the month-- I suggest that you all get on over there, purchase some plants, 
and do some landscaping at your weed-choked hovels. 

Remember, the crazy old lady next door will 
be watching.
Jonathan A. Cass -Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On 
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 7:32 
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: 
univcity@list.purple.comSubject: Re: [UC] PM-302.3 
Weeds

  
  Yeah right. "Decorative grass". Heh. Heard that one before. What are you 
  raising there, Widyono, Panama Red? Hmm? Little BC Bud? Some decorative 
  Colombian mixed in with the trailing arbutus, and the wisterias, and the 
  travelling bamboos?
  
  Ross Bender
  http://rossbender.org
  
  In a message dated 4/12/2005 5:03:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  I got slapped with this, some decorative grass in the front lawn 
apparentlywas not liked by a neighbor (who still hasn't come clean to 
let me know itwas them who contacted the police to complain, without 
ever complaining to mefirst). *I* got the ticket FOUR MONTHS after 
it was written up. Thetimestamp on the envelope proves it. 
No deal, they wanted their money. Iwasn't about to fight all the 
way to a judge, I'd wasted enough time tryingto reason with the Finance 
department (a.k.a. Collection Agency).
  


Re: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds My story.

2005-04-12 Thread Benseraglio2



Nicole, if you think you have it bad, check out this story from the Japan Times:

Jail muffles neighbor from hellNARA (Kyodo) A 58-year-old woman was arrested Monday on suspicion of intentionally torturing her 64-year-old neighbor by playing loud pop music almost 24 hours a day between November 2002 and last March. 
Miyoko Kawahara apparently made a hole in her back door to ensure that the racket from her portable stereo would reach the neighbor's house in the town of Heguri, Nara Prefecture, police said. The two homes are about 6 meters apart, they said. 
The sonic onslaught caused the neighbor to suffer insomnia and headaches. The elderly woman needed a month of medical treatment to recover, prompting police to investigate the case, they said. 
Kawahara has refused to discuss any possible motive, they said. 
She has been in conflict with her neighbors over noise for about nine years, police said. 
The Japan Times: April 12, 2005
Ross Bender
http://rossbender.org

In a message dated 4/12/2005 8:17:36 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have an elderly neighbor who has harassed me for several years.She has interrupted me while I was working on my house to yell at me on several occasions, once because a metal trash can full of old furnace debris had been left in front of my house by a plumbing contractor. It was too heavy to move and they had been promising to come get it for several days.



Re: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds My story.

2005-04-12 Thread Marlevi
A local emminent landscape architect who had planted native plants on the 
grass near the curb in front of his house was cited and fined for having 
weeds.

I guess one man's weed is another man's native plant. Strange how this 
discussion coincided with the announcement of Bartram Garden's native plant 
sale.



You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
http://www.purple.com/list.html.


Re: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds

2005-04-12 Thread Dan Widyono
Ross, Jonathan, :P

We also have flowers, and the decorative grass served to prevent theft of
our garbage cans -- we could lock them down to the slightly-higher-than-10
grass which obviously made the neighborhood look like a war zone.  Screw it,
I'll just plant the still-living (!!) bamboo in front; that'll take care of
the garbage cans *and* give us some privacy.

Dan W.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
http://www.purple.com/list.html.


Re: [UC] PM-302.3 Weeds My story.

2005-04-12 Thread Dan Widyono
For those concerned about future crabby neighbors:

Take a picture once a week of your house, with date proof (e.g. newspaper).
For anything that *might* be considered a weed, take closeup pictures, take
samples and have them dried and put in your legal scrapbook, include research
on the type of plant, etc.  You might never need this kind of proof, but if
you end up getting a ticket for several months back, it'll be handy.  Oh, and
measure all your non-flower plants to make sure they're below 10 inches tall.
Might as well take a picture of any tall-ish plants with the ruler next to
them.

Also: if the ticket Badge Number is 4 digits, a cop was called explicitly
to file a complaint about the weeds.  Also, if the department is 1-1, again
a cop wrote the ticket.  If the Badge Number is 3 digits (unlikely for
weeds), it was the streets department noticing you had tall weeds.

The above (pictures, samples, ticket identifying information) is actual
advice given to me by the City when I fought my ticket (round one, I ended up
paying without appealing to a judge).

Regards,
Dan W.

On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 09:32:56PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 A local emminent landscape architect who had planted native plants on the 
 grass near the curb in front of his house was cited and fined for having 
 weeds.

 I guess one man's weed is another man's native plant. Strange how this 
 discussion coincided with the announcement of Bartram Garden's native plant 
 sale.

-- 
-- Daniel Widyono --
-- www.widyono.net--
-- www.cis.upenn.edu/~widyono --
-- 

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
http://www.purple.com/list.html.