Re: Revolution 2.7.4 Released

2006-09-24 Thread Dar Scott


On Sep 23, 2006, at 5:16 PM, Luis wrote:

It's like the printers you buy nowadays: They don't include the  
cable!!!


When Stromberg-Carlson tried to get into the computer biz in the 50s,  
they so shorted customers that eventually many customers decided to  
just buy just the display or more often just the CRT tubes and build  
the computers themselves.  I tried to look for info on SC and  
computers of the 50s online and found nothing.  I found radios, CRT  
displays, phones, telco switches, film recorders, but not computers.   
It looks like nobody even admits to having ordered one.


In this particular case, I agree with Dan.  RunRev provides a good tool.

Dar
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: mySQL problem... HELPPPPPP

2006-09-24 Thread Ruslan Zasukhin
On 9/23/06 8:18 PM, Ton Kuypers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi Ton,

 The strange thing is, that when I update the jobs, the old ones are
 still there, even when the UserID is not correct anymore.
 Using the same query in CocoaMySQL gives the correct result.
 When I click on a Job, I can see the correct (new) userID is in the
 record, but the query still retrieves it.
 
 I even removed all extra stuff and just sent the query (giving the
 correct result in CocoaMySQL) using the revDataFromQuery command, but
 I keep on getting the same (incorrect) result :-(
 
 Anyone any suggestions?
 
 I'm running RR version 2.7.2 on OS X, using a mySQL 4.1 database with
 the MyISAM engine

Sounds strange.

* You sure that you have SINGLE database which you query from app and
CocoaMySQL?

* I could think that in APP you not finish transaction, but you use MyISAM.
So not a case.


* how exactly looks your INCORRECT result?


-- 
Best regards,

Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc

Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com

[I feel the need: the need for speed]


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: TemplateGroup Investigation

2006-09-24 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Cal Horner wrote:

 Does anyone out there actually use the templateGroup feature?

I do -- I use it to establish several properties of a group before creating
a group, such as location, margins, and name.


 Perhaps you have used it and found it to be too difficult or time consuming?

Too difficult or time consuming compared to what?  For me, it's no more
difficult to use than any other object's template properties.

Regards,

Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Multimedia  Design
-
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://www.tactilemedia.com


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Printing more than one page

2006-09-24 Thread Adrian Williams

Dan,

This is the (same) link I was given that is confusing...

http://www.shafermediastore.com/tech_main.html

It displays a price of $29.95 (not specifically stating
whether its and EBook or Printed). Below that Order a Printed Copy
but that's the same price $29.95. If that is the correct price for
the SmartEBook that's fine too. But I understood it was $5.

Investigating further, there is indeed a link at the top of the first
paragraph to theSmartEBook where I would expect to find a specific
EBook price, but again the price is shown at $29.95 or you can order
a printed copy at - $29.95.
http://www.shafermediastore.com/tech/tech1_speedthought.html

Clicking the SmartEBook link there's more blurb here...
http://www.shafermediastore.com/SmartEWhat.html
Specifics about what EBook means - but no opportunity to buy.

Would appreciate some clarity.
Thanks,
Adrian

On 23 Sep 2006, at 20:14, Dan Shafer wrote:

I'll have to go look at the pages again, but I could swear there were 
links

there to the store.

Anyway, you can get to all of the downloadable Rev SmartEBooks here:

http://www.shafermediastore.com/tech_main.html

___
Adrian Williams Design Ltd (trading as Club Type),
44 Mill Lane,
Merstham,
Redhill,
Surrey RH1 3HQ, UK

Telephone/Facsimile: 01737 643300
dFax (computer reception): 0870 0515681

International tel/fax (UK)+44 1737 643300
International dFax:  (UK)+44 870 0515681

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.clubtype.co.uk

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: How do I make a background field?

2006-09-24 Thread Judy Perry
Thanks for the links, Devin!

Judy

On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Devin Asay wrote:

 I put together some notes about Rev groups for the students in my
 beginning Rev programming class. You can read them at:

 http://revolution.byu.edu/groups/Groups.html

 See also the discussion on Object Hierarchy and the Message Path in:

 http://revolution.byu.edu/scripts/ScriptsCont.html


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Revolution 2.7.4 Released

2006-09-24 Thread Judy Perry
Huh???

When did 'one year of free updates/maintenance releases/etc.' get
dropped??

Thanking the stars my economic livelihood doesn't rely upon them...

Judy

On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Bill Marriott wrote:

 Alright. Am I correct that the price of update packs has increased now?

 Early update $188/yr (was $150)
 Standard update $253/yr (was $199)

 Lynn Fredricks wrote
  Rev without an update pack previously came with 30 days of updates.



 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Revolution 2.7.4 Released

2006-09-24 Thread Judy Perry
I'm coming in on this late, so perhaps this has already been answered, and
if so, apologies, but...

is there a difference between upgrades (which I would understand as being
from Studio - Enterprise or whatever's next on the developmental food
chain) and new releases (e.g., from 2.7.1 - 2.7.2)??

Judy

On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Kevin Miller wrote:

 On 22/9/06 23:52, Bill Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Alright. Am I correct that the price of update packs has increased now?

 No, we have not changed any pricing at all (beyond giving away 3 months of
 free upgrades with a new license purchase instead of 1 month).

 Kind regards,

 Kevin

 Kevin Miller ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.runrev.com/
 Runtime Revolution - User-Centric Development Tools

 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


re: Who's Kevin?

2006-09-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Klausss (sorry Klaus, I just couldn't resist it!) for the input.
I was surprised to see it was the CEO! I was almost sure it would be a kid who 
had been fired and threw a spanner in the works before leaving the office.
Anyway I saw Mr. Miller had a post on another Theme, just after ours on the 
same date, maybe he's still trying to work out what happened himself.
Havn't been able to repeat the incident and as Runtime are gracefully giving me 
the new update free (Just in time - I bought my  Media 2.7.2. in August about 
three days before 2.7.3 was released),I can probably forget about it.
Oh! I should have said it was the 'CANC' KEY not a button.
Bye everybody
Barry
-
Barry Barber wrote:

 While using my Media IDE I deleted a text field with the 'Canc'
 button on Windows XP but also got a message box which contained
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]!! No close button or OK etc..It just stayed there
 unremovable, it froze the Rev tool bar completely and would not let
 Rev shut down in any way.I had to log out and reboot to get things
 back to normal.
 Who is Kevin and why should I want to email him anyway?(no
 suggestions to last bit, please!)

--
Klaus Major wrote:
Hi Barry,
well, I really don't know what is going on there, but that surely is
Mr. Kevin Miller, CEO of Runtime Revolution Ltd.
Just drop him a line, maybe he can shed some light on this ;-)

Best Klaus Major





___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Who's Kevin?

2006-09-24 Thread Klaus Major

Hi Barry,


Thanks Klausss (sorry Klaus, I just couldn't resist it!)


no problem Alva... ehm Barry ;-)


for the input.
I was surprised to see it was the CEO! I was almost sure it would  
be a kid who had been fired and threw a spanner in the works before  
leaving the office.


LOL :-D

Anyway I saw Mr. Miller had a post on another Theme, just after  
ours on the same date, maybe he's still trying to work out what  
happened himself.
Havn't been able to repeat the incident and as Runtime are  
gracefully giving me the new update free (Just in time - I bought  
my  Media 2.7.2. in August about three days before 2.7.3 was  
released),I can probably forget about it.


That's good to hear.


Oh! I should have said it was the 'CANC' KEY not a button.
Bye everybody
Barry


Regards from germany

Klaus Major
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.major-k.de

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Thank You, Scott and Kevin (was Revolution 2.7.4 Released)

2006-09-24 Thread Shari
So maybe we should gather up our thoughts and state what we'd expect 
from a tool such as Revolution (I wonder how they're getting on at 
the improve Revolution mailing list...).


Apologies if my thought seem a little disjointed, been up all night 
messing about with audio (ouch!).


Cheers,

Luis.


I, for one, am grateful that Revolution even exists.  I started with 
Hypercard, which died a long, lingering death.  We waited, and 
waited, and waited for Apple to update it.  There were rumors.  So 
many rumors.  And finally we all had to accept that Apple had 
genuinely abandoned it.  And panic ensued.


If it had not been for Metacard, I don't know what choices we would 
have had.  I do not know C, or Pascal, or any of the traditional 
languages.  I learned to program by trial and error in Hypercard. 
And the help of some awesome books, particularly Hypertalk 2.2 
co-authored by our very own Jeanne DeVoto.  I've never seen a better 
programming reference.  Good job, Jeanne!


So Hypercard was dead, and Metacard hadn't quite popped into the 
realm visibly yet.


I went out and bought $500 worth of C books, assuming I would have to 
learn to program all over again.  The language in C is so radically 
different, I might as well not know anything.


Then Metacard appeared to save the day.  And they literally did save 
the day.  They were what Hypercard would be if it had been regularly 
updated and maintained.  And I never cracked the spiffy new C books 
except to look up a few oddball things on methodology.


Revolution existed as an IDE, if I remember correctly.  You could buy 
Revolution, or you could buy Metacard.  The engine was the same, the 
IDE was different.  And Revolution had some agreement with Metacard 
to license the engine, or something like that.  (Please pardon any 
errors.)


Then the two merged, or Revolution bought out Metacard, or something 
to that effect.  I'm not very clear on the combining of the two. 
Except to know that the engine is the same and the language is the 
same, and it looks like it's going to be around for a very long time.


I am grateful to feel confident that my beloved programming tool is 
still in existance, and expecting to remain so for a long time to 
come.  I have no doubt that it is a very frustrating thing to update 
and maintain a tool such as this.  And Kevin probably hears a lot 
more griping than he does thank you's.


The ending could have been much different, had Scott Raney not 
created Metacard, and had Kevin Miller not carried the torch further.


So to Scott and Kevin, THANK YOU.  Consider any future gripes minor 
to the THANK YOU for providing this tool.


As for desired features, give me a few months and I'm sure I will 
find several :-D


Shari
--
Gypsy King Software
Mac and Windows shareware games
http://www.gypsyware.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Thank You, Scott and Kevin (was Revolution 2.7.4 Released)

2006-09-24 Thread jbv


Shari,

 (SNIP)

 So Hypercard was dead, and Metacard hadn't quite popped into the
 realm visibly yet.

 (SNIP)

you probably missed it, but in the second half of the 90's, Oracle Media
Object helped bridge the gap between the death of HC and the maturity
of MC.
OMO was a very good product too, not expensive, and rock solid.
AFAIR it only went for Mac and Win platforms though.

JB

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: about Galaxy

2006-09-24 Thread Mark Wieder
Sivakatirswami-

Saturday, September 23, 2006, 1:58:07 AM, you wrote:

 2) there is some latent memory of stacks that are not really
 being closed, even though I have destroy stack set to true
   and I keep getting into infinite loops where Rev keeps thinking
 a stack that is closed and removed from memory is still there.
 Asking me to purge. I click purge and same dialog keeps coming back.
 I have to force quit and  start again. It happened  enough times...

I've seen this behavior as well, though not recently, so my guess is
that something got changed/fixed in a recent version. I know the save
operation got fixed up a bit lately, so maybe something along the way
also cured the infinite loop...

-- 
-Mark Wieder
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: about Galaxy

2006-09-24 Thread Mark Wieder
Sivakatirswami-

Saturday, September 23, 2006, 6:58:45 PM, you wrote:

 I was just trying to encourage Run Rev to keep upping the ante on the
 IDE

I'd have to respectfully disagree with this. For my two cents' worth,
I'd rather have the team working on the engine: fixing bugs and adding
new features, etc. The IDE is something that third parties can work
on: making improvements and drop-in replacements for existing features
ala Galaxy, or by adding plugins. But the engine is something that
only the rev team can modify.

-- 
-Mark Wieder
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: about Galaxy

2006-09-24 Thread Pierre Sahores

It's exactly me tought too, Mark and All ;-)

Best,

Pierre


I'd have to respectfully disagree with this. For my two cents' worth,
I'd rather have the team working on the engine: fixing bugs and adding
new features, etc. The IDE is something that third parties can work
on: making improvements and drop-in replacements for existing features
ala Galaxy, or by adding plugins. But the engine is something that
only the rev team can modify.

--  
-Mark Wieder

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



--
Pierre Sahores
www.sahores-conseil.com


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Revolution 2.7.4 Released

2006-09-24 Thread Ken Ray
On 9/24/06 3:59 AM, Judy Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Huh???
 
 When did 'one year of free updates/maintenance releases/etc.' get
 dropped??

According to the Internet Wayback machine, this happened sometime early in
2004. I know what you mean, though... I was involved with
MetaCard/Revolution before that and so my mindset is still back there...


Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software
Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Digest Reply Link

2006-09-24 Thread Peter Brigham

On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:40:05 -0700 Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Re: Digest Reply Link

Richard-

Saturday, September 16, 2006, 1:18:46 PM, you wrote:

Maybe we could turn the problem inside-out:
It shouldn't be too hard to toss together a lil' Rev stack that displays
the list archives and handles setting up reply emails.

The archives are here:
a href=lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-revolution/lists.runrev.com/ 
pipermail/use-revolution//a


A little UI, a couple libURL calls, and it's done

Actually I've been waiting for someone to do that for a while now. My
ArchiveSearch plugin does allow you to do that, but it's a search
engine rather than a message browser. I'm not sure the archives lend
themselves to browsing readily in that manner, but I do think a rev
solution would be nice.

-- -Mark Wieder
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


It's been done, in one form, at least. I have a stack called  
RevDigests Reader, created by someone on this list, a while back. I  
use it to reply to this list. I can't find any credits in the stack  
on a quick perusal, and I can't remember who authored it. Age-related  
dementia strikes again. It allows you to read messages individually  
and reply to the list with a button-click. Unless that was a feature  
that I tweaked separately (I have a habit of customizing things  
for my own use.) It should be available somewhere in the userspaces,  
IIRC.


-- Peter

Peter M. Brigham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig/

+---+
Any universe simple enough to be understood
 is incapable of evolving a brain complex
 enough to understand it.
+---+

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Thank You, Scott and Kevin (was Revolution 2.7.4 Released)

2006-09-24 Thread Tereza Snyder


On Sep 24, 2006, at 9:51 AM, jbv wrote:



Shari,


(SNIP)

So Hypercard was dead, and Metacard hadn't quite popped into the
realm visibly yet.

(SNIP)


you probably missed it, but in the second half of the 90's, Oracle  
Media

Object helped bridge the gap between the death of HC and the maturity
of MC.
OMO was a very good product too, not expensive, and rock solid.
AFAIR it only went for Mac and Win platforms though.



And in the early-mid 90's there was Spinnaker Plus, which became OMO  
and WinPlus. Spinnaker Plus' manual (which I have right here -  
believe it or not, I'm still supporting a program made with Spinnaker  
Plus!) was written by our very own Dan Shafer.


We are indeed a community with a history!

t

--
Tereza Snyder

   Califex Software, Inc.
   www.califexsoftware.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: about Galaxy

2006-09-24 Thread Luis

What, they're working on the engine?!... He he... ;)

Cheers,

Luis.


On 24 Sep 2006, at 19:16, Pierre Sahores wrote:


It's exactly me tought too, Mark and All ;-)

Best,

Pierre


I'd have to respectfully disagree with this. For my two cents' worth,
I'd rather have the team working on the engine: fixing bugs and  
adding

new features, etc. The IDE is something that third parties can work
on: making improvements and drop-in replacements for existing  
features

ala Galaxy, or by adding plugins. But the engine is something that
only the rev team can modify.

-- -Mark Wieder
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



--
Pierre Sahores
www.sahores-conseil.com


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: about Galaxy

2006-09-24 Thread Chipp Walters

I respectfully disagree with your respectful disagreement.

Here's my 2 cents, for whatever it's worth.

In order for Rev to succeed, it needs to have a decent out of the box
user experience. Look what happened to MetaCard which never had one.
Besides, asking that a script editor be at least as good as a previous
version (2.7 is way slower and IMO 'unfriendlier' than the 2.6
version) shouldn't be such a problem.

I'm pretty much staying off of 2.7 for that reason alone.

Besides, while Jerry and Trevor are two of the best Rev programmers
and do great work, the burden of running two IDE's (Galaxy and Rev's)
does take a toll on performance. Now, if Rev could just 'get out of
the way' and let Galaxy take over, it might make things different.
But, like Sivakatirswami, I, too have seen some performance issues on
earlier versions of Galaxy, enough to put me off using it.

The other issue for me is that while Galaxy is cross platform, it is
programmed mostly on Macs and I use PCs. Since I quit using it, I've
created some of my own tools to do some of the heavy lifting for me.
I've combined some features of Transcript Gadget with Inspector Gadget
and added a script manager plugin. These aren't for public
consumptions as they are still works in progress-- but I digress.

Up to now, these tools work great for me. Just last week I tried them
out on a Mac and lo and behold, lots and lots of problems. Which goes
to show how difficult it is to program on one platform for another,
especially tough IDE type stuff. It's certainly not impossible, but
difficult.

And, because Galaxy can't be completely removed without restarting Rev
(unlike Constellation and Jerry's previous products),  it is sometimes
hard to figure out exactly where the problem lies...Galaxy or Rev. All
I want to do is get work done, and it's enough for me to try and debug
1 IDE (Rev's) and not have to be concerned about another.

Perhaps it's time for Galaxy to consider becoming like MetaCard, a
complete seperate IDE for the Rev engine. Then Jerry and Trevor
wouldn't have to worry about coding 'around' Rev's own IDE. They
certainly would have more control over the interface-- and Galaxy's
interface is a most beautiful thing, not to mention well-thought out
and functional.

-Chipp

On 9/24/06, Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I'd have to respectfully disagree with this. For my two cents' worth,
I'd rather have the team working on the engine: fixing bugs and adding
new features, etc. The IDE is something that third parties can work
on: making improvements and drop-in replacements for existing features
ala Galaxy, or by adding plugins.

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Printing more than one page

2006-09-24 Thread Dan Shafer

You need just to scroll down on that page farther. The eBook price did
change. But the three SmartEBooks on specific topics are $5 each and are
clearly listed on that page.



On 9/24/06, Adrian Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Dan,

This is the (same) link I was given that is confusing...
 http://www.shafermediastore.com/tech_main.html
It displays a price of $29.95 (not specifically stating
whether its and EBook or Printed). Below that Order a Printed Copy
but that's the same price $29.95. If that is the correct price for
the SmartEBook that's fine too. But I understood it was $5.

Investigating further, there is indeed a link at the top of the first
paragraph to theSmartEBook where I would expect to find a specific
EBook price, but again the price is shown at $29.95 or you can order
a printed copy at - $29.95.
http://www.shafermediastore.com/tech/tech1_speedthought.html

Clicking the SmartEBook link there's more blurb here...
http://www.shafermediastore.com/SmartEWhat.html
Specifics about what EBook means - but no opportunity to buy.

Would appreciate some clarity.
Thanks,
Adrian

On 23 Sep 2006, at 20:14, Dan Shafer wrote:

 I'll have to go look at the pages again, but I could swear there were
 links
 there to the store.

 Anyway, you can get to all of the downloadable Rev SmartEBooks here:

 http://www.shafermediastore.com/tech_main.html
___
Adrian Williams Design Ltd (trading as Club Type),
44 Mill Lane,
Merstham,
Redhill,
Surrey RH1 3HQ, UK

Telephone/Facsimile: 01737 643300
dFax (computer reception): 0870 0515681

International tel/fax (UK)+44 1737 643300
International dFax:  (UK)+44 870 0515681

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.clubtype.co.uk

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution





--
~~
Dan Shafer, Information Product Consultant and Author
http://www.shafermedia.com
Get my book, Revolution: Software at the Speed of Thought

From http://www.shafermediastore.com/tech_main.html

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Thank You, Scott and Kevin (was Revolution 2.7.4 Released)

2006-09-24 Thread Roger . E . Eller
 On Sep 24, 2006, at 9:51 AM, jbv wrote:

 Shari,

 (SNIP)

 So Hypercard was dead, and Metacard hadn't quite popped into the
 realm visibly yet.

 (SNIP)

 you probably missed it, but in the second half of the 90's, Oracle
 Media
 Object helped bridge the gap between the death of HC and the maturity
 of MC.

On Sep 24, 2006, at 7:30 PM, Tereza Snyder wrote:

 We are indeed a community with a history!

I'll throw in a little tidbit of scarcely known history...
During this early foundation period of the language we have grown to love, 
even the Amiga computer had a development environment that used a 
hyperTalk/transcript like syntax. Actually it was exactly the same syntax, 
and also used the stacks of cards metaphore. Wonder where that idea came 
from... I wish I still had the installation diskettes (yep, floppies). 
This Amiga dev environment was called Foundation. Sadly, it never 
evolved pased version 1.0.

Roger Eller [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: about Galaxy

2006-09-24 Thread Roger . E . Eller
On Sep 24, 2006, at 7:37 PM, Chip Walters wrote:
 Perhaps it's time for Galaxy to consider becoming like MetaCard, a
 complete seperate IDE for the Rev engine. Then Jerry and Trevor
 wouldn't have to worry about coding 'around' Rev's own IDE. They
 certainly would have more control over the interface-- and Galaxy's
 interface is a most beautiful thing, not to mention well-thought out
 and functional.
 
 -Chipp

If Galaxy produced a commercial IDE replacement, wouldn't that be in 
violation of the prime directive? I mean, I remember way back, reading in 
the license agreement that you can create anything you wish with 
Revolution EXCEPT software that directly competes with RunTime and its 
IDE. I've felt like even the current incarnation of Galaxy is bordering on 
this thin line. Maybe the rules are different now. It seems that RunTime 
itself isn't concerned, but rather welcomes the 3rd party stuff. Would the 
same be true if it became a competitive product? Isn't the production of 
the MetaCard IDE a little different by being an opensource project?

Roger Eller [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: about Galaxy

2006-09-24 Thread Richard Gaskin

Roger.E.Eller wrote:


On Sep 24, 2006, at 7:37 PM, Chip Walters wrote:

Perhaps it's time for Galaxy to consider becoming like MetaCard, a
complete seperate IDE for the Rev engine.


If Galaxy produced a commercial IDE replacement, wouldn't that be in 
violation of the prime directive? I mean, I remember way back, reading in 
the license agreement that you can create anything you wish with 
Revolution EXCEPT software that directly competes with RunTime and its 
IDE.


Actually it's the opposite:  an IDE is just a collection of stacks, but 
all stacks need the engine to run, and need a licensed engine to edit 
scripts.


So regardless of whether the Rev IDE is running, you still need a Rev 
license to edit scripts.


That's the beauty of it:  RunRev can watch a thousand flowers bloom (as 
Scott Raney used to say), and still all roads lead back to Rev.


Any third-party IDE must rely on a Rev sale to be operational.  A 
win-win-win for all


--
 Richard Gaskin
 Managing Editor, revJournal
 ___
 Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: about Galaxy

2006-09-24 Thread Dar Scott


On Sep 24, 2006, at 7:36 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:

So regardless of whether the Rev IDE is running, you still need a  
Rev license to edit scripts.


Over the scripting limit.  Or is there something new?

Dar
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Revolution 2.7.4 Released

2006-09-24 Thread Jerry Muelver

Heather Nagey wrote:
months at the bundle price.


To introduce this new trial period, we are having an amnesty for 
purchasers of Revolution in the last 3 months, who didn't get the update 
pack at time of purchase. If you bought a new license after 22nd July 
2006, you will be able to unlock version 2.7.4 even if you didn't buy an 
update pack. Just use the code you received on purchase.


No, your license does not expire!

When your update pack is over, you can either renew it, or simply 
continue to use the last version you were able to unlock with it. Your 
latest copy of Revolution will not stop working.




That's good news. Now, about th Linux version being stuck at 2.6.3.

 Jerry Muelver
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Package for Windows -- Best Practice

2006-09-24 Thread Sivakatirswami
I just had my first standalone for Windows which put a .dll (the rev xml 
lib) into an externals folders. So, this is the first time I'm 
distributing  a windows standalone which requires additional components. 
It seems obvious, but correct me if I am wrong:


1) make a new folder   New Rev App
2) move New Rev App.exe and externals (folder) into the new folder.
3) zip the whole thing.

Windows users will download

NewRevApp.zip; unpack it and get a folder on their desktop
/New Rev App/ which contains the application and the externals folder.

Is this all the correct way to do it?

Sivakatirswami
www.himalayanacademy.com

Get Hinduism Today Digital Edition. It's Free!
http://www.hinduismtoday.com/digital/
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: mySQL problem... HELPPPPPP

2006-09-24 Thread Kay C Lan

On 9/23/06, Ton Kuypers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I even removed all extra stuff and just sent the query (giving the
correct result in CocoaMySQL) using the revDataFromQuery command, but
I keep on getting the same (incorrect) result :-(



Do you get incorrect data when you run revDataFromQuery from the message
box?

Are you using the DB Query builder, harder to troubleshoot, or is this all
hand generated?

When I've experience something similar it is usually because I use global,
local and temporary variables of similar names and occasionally use one out
of context:
gMyDbSqlQuery,lMyDbSqlQuery,tMyDbSqlQuery
gMyDbData,lMyDbData,tMyDbData

Those t's and 'ls can be hard to distinguish with a quick glance at the
Variable Watcher, but obviously some contain newer data and others older.

HTH
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Package for Windows -- Best Practice

2006-09-24 Thread Chipp Walters

Sivakatirswami,

Yes, create a new folder, put the DLL and EXE there and then launch
the EXE to make sure it runs. Then zip it.

Once you have the folder you may want to try Monte Goulding's
InstallGadget (built in Rev) to build an installer for it.

http://www.sweattechnologies.com/InstallGadget/

best,
Chipp
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Revolution 2.7.4 Released

2006-09-24 Thread Judy Perry
Carp!  ..., er, CRAP!!!

And I just demonstrated the use of the Wayback machine to resurrect a
neat little Mayan culture site (formerly at www.halfmoon.org) for my
'Computer Impact on Society' course... never thought I'd need to actually
have to USE it myself... grrr

Feeling old...

Judy

On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Ken Ray wrote:

 On 9/24/06 3:59 AM, Judy Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Huh???
 
  When did 'one year of free updates/maintenance releases/etc.' get
  dropped??

 According to the Internet Wayback machine, this happened sometime early in
 2004. I know what you mean, though... I was involved with
 MetaCard/Revolution before that and so my mindset is still back there...


 Ken Ray

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution