Re: My naming convention
On 07/11/2010 11:15 PM, Francis Nugent Dixon wrote: As I haven't written programs in a REAL development environment What, pray tell, do you mean by "a REAL development environment" ? I hope that that does not imply that you think that RunRev is NOT . . . . Question ! How many of you out there would be ashamed to show your coding to others ? Err . . . where is the virtual confession box? Mind you, I don't know how anybody can be so full of themselves to pronounce absolution on us crappy coders. And what sort of penances are they going to be ladling out? I know that I ALWAYS was ! This may be a vital question. I'm up to 4 cents now. I may go to 6 . ! Probably 108 ! But leading all of us to the confession box may mean that you are storing up treasure in RunRev heaven like nobody's business. If you imagine that I am going to run around in a hairshirt or sackcloth and ashes just because my programming looks like a pig's breakfast you have another thing coming; especially as I have managed to put my oar in so many other places that when the time comes those who sort these sorts of things out are going to end up with bust scales because of my karmic backlog without even taking my ghastly coding into consideration . . . :) -Francis As you say you have largely given up coding I've heard there is a job going as the "Torquemada" of the coding police; as those happy chaps said many, many years ago http://people.csail.mit.edu/paulfitz/spanish/script.html "Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition" or "The Comfy Chair" . . . :) ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
RE: My naming convention
Hi from Beautiful Brittany (although we will have rain in two days !) Richmond : I agree with you (mostly) David C : Thanks for that comment! It's gratifying. Rene Micout (excuse me if I wax into French) : Je ne peux pas être plus en accord avec toi - Pour dire vrai, je voulais secouer le pommier. Bien sur je veux écrire le plus beau code du monde, et je sais que je serais depassé par beaucoup sur ce forum. Mais j'écris chaque script comme si on allait le publier dans le Monde (avec amour et fierté) pour personne (sniff !) Damien : As I haven't written programs in a REAL development environment for more than 20 years, I tend to forget that conventions ARE important. So I will give you that (freely !). I once had to update a program written by a novice (however intelligent), and it was his first program. He named all his variables starting with his wife, and proceeding through the whole of the family, before running out of names, and so using CHINESE names. Needless to say, I bailed out ! HOWEVER, without using a complex naming convention, and using only intelligent names, which after all, IS THE SIGN OF A RELATIVELY ORGANIZED MIND, I still reckon that a comment beats this system. After more than 40 years of programming, (20 for the business, and 20 for my pleasure), I still put a comment on practically EACH line of coding - although NOBODY will ever see them. I also remember writing my first professional program (1967 - in IBM 360 autocoder), and returning to the Document Library more than 12 months later, to replace my (what I thought) pathetic programming with a new version, 'cos I was so ashamed. Question ! How many of you out there would be ashamed to show your coding to others ? I know that I ALWAYS was ! This may be a vital question. I'm up to 4 cents now. I may go to 6 . ! -Francis ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: My naming convention
2010/7/11 J. Landman Gay : > The problem is that you are not thinking hard enough about what should > happen. Rev is telepathic and you need to concentrate. The last time I tried, I squinted during 2 months, which is very disabling for a slug. -- -Zryip TheSlug- wish you the best! 8) http://www.aslugontheroad.co.cc ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: My naming convention
zryip theSlug wrote: I'm using no naming convention. I develop stacks with no variables, no handlers and no functions. I only put objects in a card, drawing circles, rectangles and other complex forms. That's way I have never bugs in my stacks. The next I have to understand now is why, when I'm clicking on a button, nothing happens! The problem is that you are not thinking hard enough about what should happen. Rev is telepathic and you need to concentrate. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: My naming convention
:-) Le 11 juil. 2010 à 15:08, zryip theSlug a écrit : > I'm using no naming convention. > I develop stacks with no variables, no handlers and no functions. > I only put objects in a card, drawing circles, rectangles and other > complex forms. > > That's way I have never bugs in my stacks. > > The next I have to understand now is why, when I'm clicking on a > button, nothing happens! > > -- > -Zryip TheSlug- wish you the best! 8) > http://www.aslugontheroad.co.cc > ___ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: My naming convention
On 07/11/2010 04:08 PM, zryip theSlug wrote: I'm using no naming convention. I develop stacks with no variables, no handlers and no functions. I only put objects in a card, drawing circles, rectangles and other complex forms. That's way I have never bugs in my stacks. The next I have to understand now is why, when I'm clicking on a button, nothing happens! I was mowing the grass in our garden yesterday when a small mollusc slithered out from under a stone and said, in a portentious voice "there are never bugs in my stacks". At which point a small back beetle crawled out from under the same stone and said "Wanna bet, bud?" Q.E.D. I rest my case. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: My naming convention
I'm using no naming convention. I develop stacks with no variables, no handlers and no functions. I only put objects in a card, drawing circles, rectangles and other complex forms. That's way I have never bugs in my stacks. The next I have to understand now is why, when I'm clicking on a button, nothing happens! -- -Zryip TheSlug- wish you the best! 8) http://www.aslugontheroad.co.cc ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: My naming convention
Hello Francis, Le 10 juil. 2010 à 19:44, Francis Nugent Dixon a écrit : > Wonderful ! I have never seen so many complex > naming conventions that I am sure you don't follow. If I bothered to think about naming conventions it is obviously to use it... > If you do, then it is for who ? If it is for you, > this means that your organizational solutions > prime upon your script development and production. > What a waste of grey matter ! I don't think this is a waste... It is a gain rather. I code for myself. During 22 years I made many tools for my job (économiste de la construction / ≈ quantity surveyor). I started with HyperCard... Now, I sometimes modify and improve stacks 20 years old. Anything that can help me understand what I have thought, or wanted to do when I was 20 years younger is welcome. In the beginning: no comment, no conventions, no method. As to the years, I learned, particularly on this list, organize my scripts could get great service. > In 5 minutes, you can write a button script to > list out Variable and Field Names, to ensure that > you don't invent duplicate names. I will definitely scare you by telling that I spend 3-4 hours to draw an icon for a button and sometimes several days to find the best aesthetic solution to an interface. > Revolution scripting is not to be pondered upon. > Just write it, as it flows out of your brain. > Forget naming conventions, and spend a little > time with comments. It beats naming conventions > every day. If anybody will ever read it except you ! Worse still, I think my code should be "beautiful" (peut-être suis-je un grand malade ?). The great masters of the "Go" say that regardless of winning if the way is not elegant and appearance of the plate at the end of the game is as important as winning. I have also comment conventions ! I think being definitely incurable ;-) > I spent years (with Hypercard) inventing a simple > and strict naming convention WHICH I MYSELF > RENAGUE ON EVERY DAY ! Since I have structured my scripting, I made great progress. In 2 months I stop working (la retraite), and I'm going to devote myself to my personal projects. The most complex, currently, "Exagofon" has 1 card, 626 controls. That make music in real time with settings for velocity, tempo, mixing 5 voices, harmonization (chords, frequencies), transposition, and so on... Without naming, comments, structure I don't think it could work. But I think it is necessary but not obligatory... Bon souvenir de Paris René___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: My naming convention
Hello Francis, > Revolution scripting is not to be pondered upon. > Just write it, as it flows out of your brain. Heh... good, bad or otherwise, I seem to have mastered that part of your message all too well. ;-) Best regards, David C. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
RE: My naming convention
Hi, I totally disagree with you, having a naming convention in an enterprise helps to produce faster application, but I am talking here about real application, not a funny stack that display few funny effects... In my other life (a life without RunRev), I am working in a team of 6 developers, everybody is using my naming convention that I told before, and the productivity gain is incredible, cause, it is not Revolution, it is C, and I am working on application that have more than 15000 lines, that communicate with multiple card, and that have dozen threads and hundred messages. So, imagine now if everybody do what they want with naming convention ? > You get lost, nobody can reuse your work. When I have to work on the file of a colleague, I simply open it, I saw that he is calling few global with the "g", few statics with the "s" and I can use few "t" variables. This took me 5 minutes to have in my head a map of the source code file.. Productivity loss? And the best things, with naming convention, in NetBeans IDE, I want a global, I press "g" + Ctrl + Space and I have got all my global listed! Have just to pick the one that need, no need to look around and find in what .h file I placed my global.. So, what I wanted to say: - Small program, utility, sure, no need convention - Real program, without one, you are dead. (yes, cause your teammates killed you :p) My 2 cents (in euros too) Damien NativeSoft, France. PS: Yes I saw the troll, but I am going in ^^ -Message d'origine- De : use-revolution-boun...@lists.runrev.com [mailto:use-revolution-boun...@lists.runrev.com] De la part de Francis Nugent Dixon Envoyé : samedi 10 juillet 2010 19:45 À : use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Objet : RE: My naming convention Hi from Beautiful Brittany, Sorry to put the proverbial cat among the pigeons ! Wonderful ! I have never seen so many complex naming conventions that I am sure you don't follow. If you do, then it is for who ? If it is for you, this means that your organizational solutions prime upon your script development and production. What a waste of grey matter ! If you spend more time wondering what you are going to call your variables, than developing your scripts, then you DO have a problem ! In 5 minutes, you can write a button script to list out Variable and Field Names, to ensure that you don't invent duplicate names. Revolution scripting is not to be pondered upon. Just write it, as it flows out of your brain. Don't invent rules that you will not follow ! Naming conventions are personal. They are mostly designed to help YOU, maintain and modify YOUR scripts in the future, if you ever NEED to return to them ! Forget naming conventions, and spend a little time with comments. It beats naming conventions every day. If anybody will ever read it except you ! If you ever have to return to your scripts (and I doubt that you do this often), you either recognize your coding, and your coding knowledge, AND YOUR COMMENTS, and so you don't need to invent a complex naming convention, or else it is not your script, and HIS naming convention is of no help whatsoever. But by the saints, an intelligent comment is !!! I spent years (with Hypercard) inventing a simple and strict naming convention WHICH I MYSELF RENAGUE ON EVERY DAY ! So - what is the point ? My 2 cents (of a euro) ! - Francis -"Nothing should ever be done for the first time !" ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: My naming convention
On 07/10/2010 08:44 PM, Francis Nugent Dixon wrote: Naming conventions are personal. They are mostly designed to help YOU, maintain and modify YOUR scripts in the future, if you ever NEED to return to them ! 1. Good point. Forget naming conventions, and spend a little time with comments. It beats naming conventions every day. If anybody will ever read it except you ! 2. Aaaah; at that "august' institution, the University of Abertay, the lecturers were continually rabbiting on about what they termed 'the number 10 bus' problem. Their scenario was that were you coding for an employer and you were run over by a bus, if you did not: 2.1. Pepper your code with comprehensive, comprehensible documentation and 2.2. Use some sort of standardised naming conventions whichever employee was given the task of continuing your work would find it well-nigh impossible to understand your work. I can see their point. If you ever have to return to your scripts (and I doubt that you do this often), 3. Every day I return to my scripts; my Devawriter and Devawriter Pro stacks contain scripts of up to 2000 lines of fairly complex stuff. What with teaching in my EFL school, lecturing at the University, running around sorting out people's hardware problems, cooking, cleaning the loo, speaking 4 languages on a daily basis, and so on; I do, often lose track of what, exactly some variable or constant was supposed to be doing very quickly indeed. you either recognize your coding, and your coding knowledge, AND YOUR COMMENTS, and so you don't need to invent a complex naming convention, or else it is not your script, 4. Ha, ha, ha! I returned to a script I wrote 7 years ago, just the other day, and had a really tough time working out what I had been trying to achieve: ther having been a lot of water under the bridge since then, and, owing to my increasing comfortableness with RunRev coding, a complete change in the way that I code. and HIS naming convention is of no help whatsoever. But by the saints, an intelligent comment is !!! 5. Yes, agreed: mind you what Richmond(2003) [mayne THIS is what 'HIS' refers to . . . :) ] and Richmond(2010) understand what constitutes "an intelligent comment" is also a bit problematic. I spent years (with Hypercard) inventing a simple and strict naming convention WHICH I MYSELF RENAGUE ON EVERY DAY ! So - what is the point ? The point is that this morning somebody made some comment about naming conventions, and, I, being what I am, could not resist taking the bait. HOWEVER; as many RunRev programmers have offerings on both the old and the new revOnline repositories, and in various other places on the internet, it might be easier for newcomers to RunRev to "ease into" RunRev if a standardise naming convention were used. sincerely, Richmond. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
RE: My naming convention
Hi from Beautiful Brittany, Sorry to put the proverbial cat among the pigeons ! Wonderful ! I have never seen so many complex naming conventions that I am sure you don't follow. If you do, then it is for who ? If it is for you, this means that your organizational solutions prime upon your script development and production. What a waste of grey matter ! If you spend more time wondering what you are going to call your variables, than developing your scripts, then you DO have a problem ! In 5 minutes, you can write a button script to list out Variable and Field Names, to ensure that you don't invent duplicate names. Revolution scripting is not to be pondered upon. Just write it, as it flows out of your brain. Don't invent rules that you will not follow ! Naming conventions are personal. They are mostly designed to help YOU, maintain and modify YOUR scripts in the future, if you ever NEED to return to them ! Forget naming conventions, and spend a little time with comments. It beats naming conventions every day. If anybody will ever read it except you ! If you ever have to return to your scripts (and I doubt that you do this often), you either recognize your coding, and your coding knowledge, AND YOUR COMMENTS, and so you don't need to invent a complex naming convention, or else it is not your script, and HIS naming convention is of no help whatsoever. But by the saints, an intelligent comment is !!! I spent years (with Hypercard) inventing a simple and strict naming convention WHICH I MYSELF RENAGUE ON EVERY DAY ! So - what is the point ? My 2 cents (of a euro) ! - Francis -"Nothing should ever be done for the first time !" ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: My naming convention
Richmond- Saturday, July 10, 2010, 5:10:33 AM, you wrote: > I think this is great and we really out to carry on this htread with as > many poeple submitting their > naming conventions as possible; we might then be able to abstract some > sort of commonality > which would allow us to develop a more standardised naming convention > for RunRev. Saturday, July 10, 2010, 4:20:26 AM, Damien Girard wrote: Personnally I am using this naming convention: - first letter in lowercase, then Uppercase for the first letter of each word. - tMyVariable -> Variable available in the handler - sMyVariable -> Variable available in the script (local) - gMyVariable -> Global variable (global) - kMyVariable -> Constant (constant) - cMyVariable -> Variable that contain custom properties - pMyParameter -> Parameter I use all these with the exception of switching - uMyVariable -> User-defined custom property (Silly me - I'm reserving "c" for "class", expecting that someday we'll have real OOP in xtalk) Saturday, July 10, 2010, 4:52:33 AM, René Micout wrote: Prefix of 3 chars for objects : button, field, group, slider, label, image, graphic btn = bouton fld = field grp = groupe sld = slider lbl = label img = image grc = graphic I also use all these and ary = array -- -Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: My naming convention
On 07/10/2010 03:57 PM, Jim Ault wrote: On Jul 10, 2010, at 3:18 AM, Richmond wrote: vSTUFF" is a variable "cSTUFF" is a constant "sSTUFF" is a string "aSTUFF" is an array - needless-to-say; I almost NEVER adhere to this convention . . . :) so what you mean to say is that. I almost cNEVER adhere to this convention . . . :) is really I almost vNEVER adhere to this convention . . . :) Worth a try . . . :) But, no; I just go on giving things any silly, old name that takes my fancy. For example; in my Devawriter Pro stack there is a field that contains a short script to deal with some of the peculiarities of the letter 'R' in Devanagari-Sanskrit; it is called fld "ARSE" - which makes perfect sense to me (in more ways than one considering the state I got myself in working that subroutine out) but does NOT adhere to my naming convention. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: My naming convention
On Jul 10, 2010, at 3:18 AM, Richmond wrote: vSTUFF" is a variable "cSTUFF" is a constant "sSTUFF" is a string "aSTUFF" is an array - needless-to-say; I almost NEVER adhere to this convention . . . :) so what you mean to say is that. I almost cNEVER adhere to this convention . . . :) is really I almost vNEVER adhere to this convention . . . :) Jim Ault Las Vegas ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: My naming convention
On 07/10/2010 02:52 PM, René Micout wrote: Mine (sorry "in French") : Prefix of 2 chars for constant, variable, custom prop, handler, command, function Prefix of 3 chars for objects : button, field, group, slider, label, image, graphic -- PRÉFIXES (types des objets) : -- ku = constante (unitaire) kt = constante (tableau)> utiliser plutôt une custom property -- vg = variable globale [stack] vt = variable globale (tableau) [stack] vl = variable locale [script] vx = variable temporaire [handler] vp = paramètre [fonctions] vd = variable provisoire servant au debugage -- cp = custom property -- hm = handler main stack (handler situé dans le stack principal) hs = handler stack (handler situé dans le script du stack) hc = handler card (handler situé dans le script de la carte) hg = handler group (handler situé dans le script du groupe) ho = handler objet (handler situé dans le script de l'objet) -- fm = function main stack (fonction située dans le stack principal) fs = function stack (fonction située dans le script du stack) fc = function card (fonction située dans le script de la carte) fg = function group (fonction située dans le script du groupe) fo = function objet (fonction située dans le script de l'objet) db = fonction ou commande servant au debugage -- btn = bouton fld = field grp = groupe sld = slider lbl = label img = image grc = graphic This is rather better than mine (and more comprehensive) insofar as by having 3 letter prefixes one doesn't have to use a 'p' (as in Picture) for a graphic object. It also keys directly into the short forms of objects in RunRev. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: My naming convention
On 07/10/2010 02:20 PM, Damien Girard wrote: Personnally I am using this naming convention: - first letter in lowercase, then Uppercase for the first letter of each word. - tMyVariable -> Variable available in the handler - sMyVariable -> Variable available in the script (local) - gMyVariable -> Global variable (global) - kMyVariable -> Constant (constant) - cMyVariable -> Variable that contain custom properties - pMyParameter -> Parameter In C, I use the same naming convention, the difference is: - Instead of Uppercase, I use "_" to separate words. - t_my_variable -> Variable available in the handler - s_my_variable -> Variable available in the file (static) - g_my_variable -> Variable available in the application (extern) - k_my_variable -> Constant - p_my_paramater -> Parameter (you see the *, you are not dumb, no need of a "pointer" prefix) And for C++/C#, same as Revolution. This enable me to mix C/C++ and to see quickly in what file I am located. After, for objects, I have no convention, but usually in rev I define the name of objects only in lowercase, in order to not mix with variables. All my softwares are written like that, and it works ;) (more than 20 000 lignes software...) (I stolen this convention from a Rev user, but I do not remember who lol, btw thanks to him ^^) Also, I am using DoxyGen in C/C++, and NativeDoc in Rev, that's helping a lot :p I think this is great and we really out to carry on this htread with as many poeple submitting their naming conventions as possible; we might then be able to abstract some sort of commonality which would allow us to develop a more standardised naming convention for RunRev. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: My naming convention
Mine (sorry "in French") : Prefix of 2 chars for constant, variable, custom prop, handler, command, function Prefix of 3 chars for objects : button, field, group, slider, label, image, graphic -- PRÉFIXES (types des objets) : -- ku = constante (unitaire) kt = constante (tableau) > utiliser plutôt une custom property -- vg = variable globale [stack] vt = variable globale (tableau) [stack] vl = variable locale [script] vx = variable temporaire [handler] vp = paramètre [fonctions] vd = variable provisoire servant au debugage -- cp = custom property -- hm = handler main stack (handler situé dans le stack principal) hs = handler stack (handler situé dans le script du stack) hc = handler card (handler situé dans le script de la carte) hg = handler group (handler situé dans le script du groupe) ho = handler objet (handler situé dans le script de l'objet) -- fm = function main stack (fonction située dans le stack principal) fs = function stack (fonction située dans le script du stack) fc = function card (fonction située dans le script de la carte) fg = function group (fonction située dans le script du groupe) fo = function objet (fonction située dans le script de l'objet) db = fonction ou commande servant au debugage -- btn = bouton fld = field grp = groupe sld = slider lbl = label img = image grc = graphic___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
RE: My naming convention
Personnally I am using this naming convention: - first letter in lowercase, then Uppercase for the first letter of each word. - tMyVariable -> Variable available in the handler - sMyVariable -> Variable available in the script (local) - gMyVariable -> Global variable (global) - kMyVariable -> Constant (constant) - cMyVariable -> Variable that contain custom properties - pMyParameter -> Parameter In C, I use the same naming convention, the difference is: - Instead of Uppercase, I use "_" to separate words. - t_my_variable -> Variable available in the handler - s_my_variable -> Variable available in the file (static) - g_my_variable -> Variable available in the application (extern) - k_my_variable -> Constant - p_my_paramater -> Parameter (you see the *, you are not dumb, no need of a "pointer" prefix) And for C++/C#, same as Revolution. This enable me to mix C/C++ and to see quickly in what file I am located. After, for objects, I have no convention, but usually in rev I define the name of objects only in lowercase, in order to not mix with variables. All my softwares are written like that, and it works ;) (more than 20 000 lignes software...) (I stolen this convention from a Rev user, but I do not remember who lol, btw thanks to him ^^) Also, I am using DoxyGen in C/C++, and NativeDoc in Rev, that's helping a lot :p -Message d'origine- De : use-revolution-boun...@lists.runrev.com [mailto:use-revolution-boun...@lists.runrev.com] De la part de Richmond Envoyé : samedi 10 juillet 2010 12:18 À : How to use Revolution Objet : My naming convention For what it is worth; I always start a field's name with a lowercase 'f' - the rest in uppercase: e.g. "fSTUFF" so, similarly with other objects: "gSTUFF" will be a group, "ggSTUFF" will be a group containing subordinate groups, "iSTUFF" is an image, "pSTUFF" is (oddly enough) a graphic object "bSTUFF" is a button - "vSTUFF" is a variable "cSTUFF" is a constant "sSTUFF" is a string "aSTUFF" is an array - needless-to-say; I almost NEVER adhere to this convention . . . :) RunRev, having no intrinsic naming conventions, cheerfully allows one to wander off rather tangentially if one is not very careful. What I DO do is have a piece of paper on a clipboard on my lap where I write down every object's name and what it is with a pencil. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
