[Neo4j] Auto-index fulltext?
Is the 1.4 auto-index only exact? Or can it be configured to be a fulltext index? (Btw, it would be awesome if we could have two auto-indexes: one exact, one full-text. It would be great in general if all indexing could be auto. Not sure when you would ever want/need manual indexing.) Aseem ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
[Neo4j] Auto-indexing feature request: transform
We transform some of our properties currently before (manually) indexing them. Simple examples are lowercase (fulltext indexes supports a lowercase config that defaults to true, but exact ones don't, I was disappointed to find), but more complex ones are e.g. stripping special characters. It would be great if the auto-indexer could support this notion of transforming property values (and queries) through user-defined function, just like traversal accepts a user-defined filter function. (And, fwiw, we're users of the REST API, so ideally this functionality would be exposed over REST too.) Cheers, Aseem ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
[Neo4j] GSoC 2011 Neo4j Geoprocessing | Weekly Report #7
Hi, This week I added just more spatial functions: ST_LengthInMeters ST_LengthInMiles ST_LongestLine ST_DistanceInMeters ST_DistanceInMiles ST_MaxDistance ST_MaxDistanceInMeter ST_MaxDistanceInMiles ST_ShortestLine ST_SymDifference ST_DelaunayTriangle ST_Difference ST_ConvexHull ST_Boundary ST_CoordDim ST_Dimension ST_Envelope ST_IsSimple ST_IsNotSimple ST_NumGeometries ST_NumPoints ST_PointN ST_SRID ST_GeometryN ST_GeometryType ST_NumInteriorRings ST_ExteriorRing Best Regards Andreas Wilhelm ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] GSoC 2011 Neo4j Geoprocessing | Weekly Report #7
Wilhelm, You are crunching it! Good work, hope to help out with the docs. /peter Sent from my phone. On Jul 16, 2011 9:56 AM, Andreas Wilhelm a...@kabelbw.de wrote: Hi, This week I added just more spatial functions: ST_LengthInMeters ST_LengthInMiles ST_LongestLine ST_DistanceInMeters ST_DistanceInMiles ST_MaxDistance ST_MaxDistanceInMeter ST_MaxDistanceInMiles ST_ShortestLine ST_SymDifference ST_DelaunayTriangle ST_Difference ST_ConvexHull ST_Boundary ST_CoordDim ST_Dimension ST_Envelope ST_IsSimple ST_IsNotSimple ST_NumGeometries ST_NumPoints ST_PointN ST_SRID ST_GeometryN ST_GeometryType ST_NumInteriorRings ST_ExteriorRing Best Regards Andreas Wilhelm ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] GSoC 2011 Neo4j Geoprocessing | Weekly Report #7
Btw, Is this all generic or implemented for OSM only? /peter Sent from my phone. On Jul 16, 2011 9:56 AM, Andreas Wilhelm a...@kabelbw.de wrote: Hi, This week I added just more spatial functions: ST_LengthInMeters ST_LengthInMiles ST_LongestLine ST_DistanceInMeters ST_DistanceInMiles ST_MaxDistance ST_MaxDistanceInMeter ST_MaxDistanceInMiles ST_ShortestLine ST_SymDifference ST_DelaunayTriangle ST_Difference ST_ConvexHull ST_Boundary ST_CoordDim ST_Dimension ST_Envelope ST_IsSimple ST_IsNotSimple ST_NumGeometries ST_NumPoints ST_PointN ST_SRID ST_GeometryN ST_GeometryType ST_NumInteriorRings ST_ExteriorRing Best Regards Andreas Wilhelm ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Best practice to avoid Unable to lock store error?
better that a singleton: get it injected! And you don't need a DI framework for that just System separation in Bootstrap and Runtime. PS I recommend the cleancoders.com videos to everyone. Great content fun mobile mail please excuse brevity and typos Am 16.07.2011 um 01:19 schrieb Rick Bullotta rick.bullo...@thingworx.com: Why would you do that? Keep the database open as a singleton instead. - Reply message - From: noppanit noppani...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Jul 15, 2011 7:00 pm Subject: [Neo4j] Best practice to avoid Unable to lock store error? To: user@lists.neo4j.org user@lists.neo4j.org Such as. Unable to lock store [/Users/xxx/db/neostore], this is usually caused by another Neo4j kernel already running in this JVM for this particular store I'm getting this error when the the user tries to insert into the database really fast (e.g, multiple clicks). The design that I use is to open and shutdown after each commit. So, sometime may be the database is not finish and the user clicks again. I think one way would be to disable the button after one click, but is there a better way to deal with that? -- View this message in context: http://neo4j-user-list.438527.n3.nabble.com/Best-practice-to-avoid-Unable-to-lock-store-error-tp3173592p3173592.html Sent from the Neo4J User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] unique relationships?
It makes perfect sense to be able to create multiple relatationships between two nodes, once you consider that relationships have properties. For example: Elizabeth Taylor --MARRIED_TO [from: 1964, to: 1974]-- Richard BurtonElizabeth Taylor --MARRIED_TO [from: 1975, to: 1976]-- Richard Burton Having a multigraph (a graph allowing multiple relationships between two nodes) is especially useful for temporal information. Many relationships we customarily define as singular are in fact temporal. Your example the LIKES relationship is in principle temporal too. Alice --Likes [from: 1990, to: 2004]-- BobAlice --Likes [from: 2010]-- Bob Alice liked Bob for many years, but they had a fall out over something Bob did in 2004. For a couple years Alice was really angry with Bob and didn't like him anymore.When they met again in 2010, Alice realized that despite what happened in 2004, Bob is still a swell guy and now she likes him again. You cannot turn off the creation of multiple relationships between two nodes, but you can check for the existence of a relationship before creating one. From: bo...@popcha.com Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 22:57:33 -0400 To: user@lists.neo4j.org Subject: [Neo4j] unique relationships? If I create the same relationship between two nodes, say a-LIKES-b, more than once, a new relationship with a new id is created such that when I look up all of a's LIKES relationships I get b multiple times. I know I can unique this away, but I wonder what the logic of doing it this way is and if I can turn it off. I'm on 1.4 Thanks! ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] GSoC 2011 Neo4j Geoprocessing | Weekly Report #7
It should be working with all layers which are implementing the EditLayer or Layer interface, but I tested it only with OSMLayer. Am 16.07.2011 10:03, schrieb Peter Neubauer: Btw, Is this all generic or implemented for OSM only? /peter Sent from my phone. On Jul 16, 2011 9:56 AM, Andreas Wilhelma...@kabelbw.de wrote: Hi, This week I added just more spatial functions: ST_LengthInMeters ST_LengthInMiles ST_LongestLine ST_DistanceInMeters ST_DistanceInMiles ST_MaxDistance ST_MaxDistanceInMeter ST_MaxDistanceInMiles ST_ShortestLine ST_SymDifference ST_DelaunayTriangle ST_Difference ST_ConvexHull ST_Boundary ST_CoordDim ST_Dimension ST_Envelope ST_IsSimple ST_IsNotSimple ST_NumGeometries ST_NumPoints ST_PointN ST_SRID ST_GeometryN ST_GeometryType ST_NumInteriorRings ST_ExteriorRing Best Regards Andreas Wilhelm ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
[Neo4j] Synchronization of EmbeddedReadOnlyGraphDatabase - Bug?
Hello, I try to use Neo4J in a Ruby on Rails application (MRI Ruby not JRuby). Due to Rails process-based model I run one instance of the EmbeddedGraphDatabase in a separate process. All write updates coming in from user actions are delegated to this process. The EmbeddedGraphDatabase here serves as a pure writeable database. All reads are handled directly in the web app through multiple instances of EmbeddedReadOnlyGraphDatabase (one instance for each web server process). Unfortunately I encountered the following problem: When adding a new relationship to a node (via the EmbeddedGraphDatabase), this relationship is not visible to the EmbeddedReadOnlyGraphDatabase. I can reopen the EmbeddedReadOnlyGraphDatabase from time to time or even at each request, but this ends up with an InvalidRecordException: Record[9180] not in use when trying to traverse the node or trying to get the relationships. 9180 is the newly created relationship. Only when I restart the EmbeddedGraphDatabase this relationship is visible to the EmbeddedReadOnlyGraphDatabase without any exceptions but this shouldn't be the use case. Is this a bug or is there an explicit way to synchronize both types of database instances? Thank you very much! Regards, Mathias ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] GSoC 2011 Neo4j Geoprocessing | Weekly Report #7
Ok, Cool, will take a look. /peter Sent from my phone. On Jul 16, 2011 12:49 PM, Andreas Wilhelm a...@kabelbw.de wrote: It should be working with all layers which are implementing the EditLayer or Layer interface, but I tested it only with OSMLayer. Am 16.07.2011 10:03, schrieb Peter Neubauer: Btw, Is this all generic or implemented for OSM only? /peter Sent from my phone. On Jul 16, 2011 9:56 AM, Andreas Wilhelma...@kabelbw.de wrote: Hi, This week I added just more spatial functions: ST_LengthInMeters ST_LengthInMiles ST_LongestLine ST_DistanceInMeters ST_DistanceInMiles ST_MaxDistance ST_MaxDistanceInMeter ST_MaxDistanceInMiles ST_ShortestLine ST_SymDifference ST_DelaunayTriangle ST_Difference ST_ConvexHull ST_Boundary ST_CoordDim ST_Dimension ST_Envelope ST_IsSimple ST_IsNotSimple ST_NumGeometries ST_NumPoints ST_PointN ST_SRID ST_GeometryN ST_GeometryType ST_NumInteriorRings ST_ExteriorRing Best Regards Andreas Wilhelm ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Synchronization of EmbeddedReadOnlyGraphDatabase - Bug?
Hi Mattias, If I understand you correctly, you're pointing two database instances (one being read-only) at the same on-disk location. Is that correct? Jim On 16 Jul 2011, at 07:37, Mathias Hensel wrote: Hello, I try to use Neo4J in a Ruby on Rails application (MRI Ruby not JRuby). Due to Rails process-based model I run one instance of the EmbeddedGraphDatabase in a separate process. All write updates coming in from user actions are delegated to this process. The EmbeddedGraphDatabase here serves as a pure writeable database. All reads are handled directly in the web app through multiple instances of EmbeddedReadOnlyGraphDatabase (one instance for each web server process). Unfortunately I encountered the following problem: When adding a new relationship to a node (via the EmbeddedGraphDatabase), this relationship is not visible to the EmbeddedReadOnlyGraphDatabase. I can reopen the EmbeddedReadOnlyGraphDatabase from time to time or even at each request, but this ends up with an InvalidRecordException: Record[9180] not in use when trying to traverse the node or trying to get the relationships. 9180 is the newly created relationship. Only when I restart the EmbeddedGraphDatabase this relationship is visible to the EmbeddedReadOnlyGraphDatabase without any exceptions but this shouldn't be the use case. Is this a bug or is there an explicit way to synchronize both types of database instances? Thank you very much! Regards, Mathias ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
[Neo4j] updated Neoclipse for 1.4.M06
Hi, Is there an updated version for Neoclipe for M06? I'm not able to open the DB created with the latest version in the older Neoclipse? Any other suggestions? Regards, Dharmendra. ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] updated Neoclipse for 1.4.M06
Hi Dharmendra, I'm happily using the 1.4 M04 Neoclipse with the 1.4GA release of Neo4j on mac osx. What symptoms are you seeing? Jim ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] updated Neoclipse for 1.4.M06
It works as a charm :) Thanks Jim! - Dharmendra. On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Dharmendra Kumar dharmendra...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks for the reply Jim! I'm getting the following error when trying to open the DB in Neoclipse (1.4 M04): TransactionFailureException: Could not create data source [nioneodb] Cause of exception: *Store version [Neo store v0.9.9]. Please make sure you are not running old Neo4j kernel towards a store that has been created by newer version of Neo4j.* I think I've some issue with my project configuration.I was using Jo4Neo for persistence (v0.5), which is compiled with Neo4j 1.4.M06. But I used the neo4j 1.5 at runtime. I'll try to correct the version mismatch issue and retry. -Dharmendra. On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Jim Webber j...@neotechnology.com wrote: Hi Dharmendra, I'm happily using the 1.4 M04 Neoclipse with the 1.4GA release of Neo4j on mac osx. What symptoms are you seeing? Jim ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects
That's clear. Such mappings are more difficult to traverse since the traverser has to know if there is such a hyper edge vertex. I'm wondering if there is no need to provide an embedded solution for such a transformation. Each user who is confronted with hyper edges has to implement some kind of such mapping. It would be helpful, for example, if each Neo4j relationship can manage hyper edges automatically and provide an additional 'isHyper' method pointing out that there are additional methods allowing to get all further incident nodes. This is also a matter of performance. I think such a handling is implemented most efficiently within the Neo4j engine. Best regards Norbert Tausch Am 16.07.2011 00:52, schrieb Niels Hoogeveen: Hyper edges can be emulated. Suppose you want to store the fact John gives Pete a book. This is indeed a ternary relationship, which would call for an hyper edge. This fact can be stored as follows: Some act of giving --Giver--JohnSome act of giving --Recipient-- PeteSome act of giving --Gift-- book N-ary relationships can generally be decomposed into N binary relationships, where a central node is used to used as a placeholder for the N-ary relationship. Complex types can either be stored into a byte array or if appropriate in multiple properties. Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 00:04:15 +0200 From: ntausc...@gmail.com To: user@lists.neo4j.org Subject: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects Hi, is there a possibility to store hyper edges in Neo4j? Is there a plan to implement this? Will Neo4j get the ability to store complex types in addition to primitve data types for properties of nodes and relationships? -- Best regards Norbert Tausch ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
[Neo4j] Bulbflow: a Python framework for Neo4j
Hey guys - I just released Bulbflow, a new Python framework for graph databases. It supports Neo4j and Gremlin through Rexster, and it's online at http://bulbflow.com . Enjoy! - James -- View this message in context: http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Bulbflow-a-Python-framework-for-Neo4j-tp3175275p3175275.html Sent from the Neo4J Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Bulbflow: a Python framework for Neo4j
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 15:40, espeed ja...@jamesthornton.com wrote: Hey guys - I just released Bulbflow, a new Python framework for graph databases. It supports Neo4j and Gremlin through Rexster, and it's online at http://bulbflow.com . That's really cool! It seems like we were doing same similar things: python-rexster [1]. Regards. [1] http://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-rexster/ -- Javier de la Rosa http://versae.es ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects
I completely agree, hyperedges and the accompanying traversers should be handled in a library. As you probably know the traversal framework currently also uses the core API under the hood to perform the traversals (and no black magic (yet)). So it should be fairly easy to take that approach/code and create a library that abstracts the hyper-edge issues (creation, deletion, traversal). The position semantics based approach sounds interesting. Would love to see that as community contribution. Cheers Michael Am 16.07.2011 um 23:08 schrieb Niels Hoogeveen: The question is how much easier a traverser can become when there were dedicated hyper edges. In a binary relation it is fairly easy to define one end of the relation as the source and the other as the target (start and end node), but in n-ary relationships the roles of the attached nodes become more complicated. Suppose we have the GIVES relationship, where one attached node takes the role of subject (the giver), one node takes the role of direct object (the gift), and another node takes the role of indirect object (the recipient). To traverse such a graph, we need to know these different roles, otherwise we may end up traversing the wrong nodes. Suppose we the following statements: John gives Paul a servant. Paul visited Albania. Paul's servant visited Albania. We now want to know all people that received a gift from John and who visited Albania. Without properly denoting the roles in the ternary relationship stated by John gives Paul a servant, the answer to the query may well be: Paul and Paul's servant. Both are persons, both have visited Albania and both are part of the GIVES relationship defined. When we have to define the exact roles of each part of an n-ary relationship for each traversal, it is just as complicated as defining a traversal based on binary relationships, where different relationship types denote the roles of each part of the n-ary relationship. If hyperedges were to be introduced, either as a library or in core, the entire notion of the graph and how traversals are performed need to be rethought. The concept of an edge as having a start and an end node doesn't translate well into the world of hyper edges. There is not necessarily a start node and an end node, instead there are various nodes that are distinctly attached to the hyper edge. One way to think about an edge in both the graph and in the hypergraph world is as a tuple. A binary relationship can be thought of as the tuple: (node1, node2, RelationshipType, Set(property)) A ternary relationship can be thought of as the tuple: (node1, node2, node3, RelationshipType, Set(property)) etc... Instead of marking a binary relationship as outgoing or incoming, we can use the position in the tuple to denote its role. We can say the first node in the tuple corresponds to the start node, and the second node in the tuple corresponds to the end node. Having two possible permutations relates to the two possible directions an edge can have. Position based definitions of relationships translate well into the domain of n-ary relationships, though the semantics of such relationships can easily become difficult. A ternary relationship already has 6 permutations for the attached nodes, while a 10-ary relationship has 3,628,800 possible permutations. It would be an interesting project to design a tuple-position-based traverser. For binary relationships it should have the exact same features as the current direction based traverser, but it would be possible to generalize that design to n-ary relationships. This can all be done as a libary. Only when perfomance can be really improved in core, does it make sense to request for native support. Niels Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 19:31:22 +0200 From: ntausc...@gmail.com To: user@lists.neo4j.org Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects That's clear. Such mappings are more difficult to traverse since the traverser has to know if there is such a hyper edge vertex. I'm wondering if there is no need to provide an embedded solution for such a transformation. Each user who is confronted with hyper edges has to implement some kind of such mapping. It would be helpful, for example, if each Neo4j relationship can manage hyper edges automatically and provide an additional 'isHyper' method pointing out that there are additional methods allowing to get all further incident nodes. This is also a matter of performance. I think such a handling is implemented most efficiently within the Neo4j engine. Best regards Norbert Tausch Am 16.07.2011 00:52, schrieb Niels Hoogeveen: Hyper edges can be emulated. Suppose you want to store the fact John gives Pete a book. This is indeed a ternary relationship, which would call for an hyper edge. This fact can be stored as follows: Some act of
[Neo4j] Fwd: unique relationships?
Thanks! This makes perfect sense and has deepened my understanding of how to use graphs. Nonetheless, I still have a practical problem, I am using REST to interact with the datastore and if I query if a relationship exists before creating every relationship, it's going to be really slow. I am creating relationships in bulk now. Perhaps there is some Gremlin kung foo I can run after I batch create my relationships which will clean out all the redundant relationships (those which have all duplicate properties). Can someone help? Thanks! On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Niels Hoogeveen pd_aficion...@hotmail.comwrote: It makes perfect sense to be able to create multiple relatationships between two nodes, once you consider that relationships have properties. For example: Elizabeth Taylor --MARRIED_TO [from: 1964, to: 1974]-- Richard BurtonElizabeth Taylor --MARRIED_TO [from: 1975, to: 1976]-- Richard Burton Having a multigraph (a graph allowing multiple relationships between two nodes) is especially useful for temporal information. Many relationships we customarily define as singular are in fact temporal. Your example the LIKES relationship is in principle temporal too. Alice --Likes [from: 1990, to: 2004]-- BobAlice --Likes [from: 2010]-- Bob Alice liked Bob for many years, but they had a fall out over something Bob did in 2004. For a couple years Alice was really angry with Bob and didn't like him anymore.When they met again in 2010, Alice realized that despite what happened in 2004, Bob is still a swell guy and now she likes him again. You cannot turn off the creation of multiple relationships between two nodes, but you can check for the existence of a relationship before creating one. From: bo...@popcha.com Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 22:57:33 -0400 To: user@lists.neo4j.org Subject: [Neo4j] unique relationships? If I create the same relationship between two nodes, say a-LIKES-b, more than once, a new relationship with a new id is created such that when I look up all of a's LIKES relationships I get b multiple times. I know I can unique this away, but I wonder what the logic of doing it this way is and if I can turn it off. I'm on 1.4 Thanks! ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Bulbflow: a Python framework for Neo4j
Hi Javier - Thanks! Yeah, Bulbflow (Bulbs) is what I was talking in when we were commenting in Hacker News a few weeks ago (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2684816). I have used your API for the Neo4j REST server, but I didn't know you were working on one for Rexster too -- we should exchange notes :) - James -- View this message in context: http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Bulbflow-a-Python-framework-for-Neo4j-tp3175275p3176095.html Sent from the Neo4J Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
