RE: Can we *please* havea seperate Struts *2* - User list?

2007-04-13 Thread Peter . Pilgrim
Probably not! Leaving UBS unsubscribing myself ;-(

--
Peter Pilgrim
UBS Investment Bank, 
Client Portal Dev LDN,
Triton Court, 14 Finsbury Square, London, EC2A 1PD
United Kingdom (  +44 (0)207 56 75692 )
:: Java EE Spring 2.0 Hibernate 3.2 Development ::
Visit our website at http://www.ubs.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mails are not encrypted and cannot be guaranteed to be secure or
error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender
therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the
contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities
or related financial instruments.

UBS Limited is a company registered in England  Wales under company
number 2035362, whose registered office is at 1 Finsbury Avenue,
London, EC2M 2PP, United Kingdom.

UBS AG (London Branch) is registered as a branch of a foreign company
under number BR004507, whose registered office is at
1 Finsbury Avenue, London, EC2M 2PP, United Kingdom.

UBS Clearing and Execution Services Limited is a company registered
in England  Wales under company number 03123037, whose registered
office is at 1 Finsbury Avenue, London, EC2M 2PP, United Kingdom.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Can we *please* havea seperate Struts *2* - User list?

2007-04-11 Thread Bruno Melloni
I have to agree.  Having a separate Struts 2 list would be nice, but
let's face it... 

- Struts 1 owned the web presentation space, making the move from 1.x
to 1.y brainless.  

- But since Struts 2 is a complete rewrite and JSF is competing strongly
for the same space (with much help from the tool vendors), the choice to
go to from Struts 1 to 2 is not easy for today's developers.  

Struts 2 - regardless of how much better it is - needs all the help it
can get to establish itself in the minds of developers.  The price we
pay by slogging through 100 emails per day in a single list is small if
it helps Struts 2 win the battle.

Bruno

-Original Message-
From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 7:59 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Can we *please* havea seperate Struts *2* - User list?

I think the thought behind not splitting the lists to this point is that
Apache experience has been that it tends to divide a community rather
than direct traffic in a more granular way.  The idea is that a Struts
user is a Struts user regardless of version, and those that may not be
using S2 today (yours truly included for the most part) may well be
using it tomorrow... a person can get a leg-up just by keeping an eye on
the S2 posts (I know that's true for me).  One could always subscribe to
multiple lists of course, but in terms of community, a single united
list theoretically at least yields more synergy.  This is my
interpretation of things I've seen stated in the past (I happen to agree
with it too :) ).  Maybe the thinking is different now by those who are
in a position to change things, I don't know.

As for a forum, I seem to remember Apache infrastructure not supporting
it, and I also seem to remember something about Apache projects not
(directly at least) using outside resources... others more knowledgeable
than I would have to answer this though... I can't off the top of my
head think of any other Apache project that has a forum that is
officially linked to the project.  As a personal opinion, I'm not sure I
see the benefit of a forum vs. a mailing list, they seem pretty well
even to me, maybe a slight edge to the mailing list since it goes to my
mail client... I could see a good argument though for a forum that
supplies an RSS feed too.

Frank

Antony Stubbs wrote:
 Well it might have made sense if struts 2 issues were somehow 
 applicable to struts 1, but they're mostly not.
 
 For Struts 2 to be adopted, it needs to be clearly separated from 
 struts 1, as is the code base. This includes having clearly separate 
 support to make it as easy as possible to find help. It's not like 
 it's we want a struts 1.5 list. 2 is very different from 1.
 
 What's the mentality for keeping them jumbled together?
 
 I suppose you don't see a separate mailing list for every major 
 tapestry release, but this is a case of adopting the best process that

 fit's the situation, and in this situation the lists should be
seperate IMO.
 
 
 Dave Newton-4 wrote:
 --- Antony Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This list seems to be quite busy, and I think everyone would benefit

 hugely from separating out
 the
 two frameworks for obvious reasons. Actually I'm surprised this 
 hasn't been done already.
 It's been brought up (even by me) in the past; I still agree and 
 would vote for separation if it was votable.

 d.



  
 _
 ___
 Finding fabulous fares is fun.  
 Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight

 and hotel bargains.
 http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 

--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
AIM/Yahoo: fzammetti
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author of Practical Ajax Projects With Java Technology
  (2006, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-695-1)
Java Web Parts - http://javawebparts.sourceforge.net
  Supplying the wheel, so you don't have to reinvent it!

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can we *please* havea seperate Struts *2* - User list?

2007-04-11 Thread cilquirm


Just FYI, Nabble does provide RSS feeds on a per-list/forum level.

I Live-bookmark http://www.nabble.com/Struts---User-f206.html




Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
 
 I think the thought behind not splitting the lists to this point is that 
 Apache experience has been that it tends to divide a community rather 
 than direct traffic in a more granular way.  The idea is that a Struts 
 user is a Struts user regardless of version, and those that may not be 
 using S2 today (yours truly included for the most part) may well be 
 using it tomorrow... a person can get a leg-up just by keeping an eye on 
 the S2 posts (I know that's true for me).  One could always subscribe to 
 multiple lists of course, but in terms of community, a single united 
 list theoretically at least yields more synergy.  This is my 
 interpretation of things I've seen stated in the past (I happen to agree 
 with it too :) ).  Maybe the thinking is different now by those who are 
 in a position to change things, I don't know.
 
 As for a forum, I seem to remember Apache infrastructure not supporting 
 it, and I also seem to remember something about Apache projects not 
 (directly at least) using outside resources... others more knowledgeable 
 than I would have to answer this though... I can't off the top of my 
 head think of any other Apache project that has a forum that is 
 officially linked to the project.  As a personal opinion, I'm not sure I 
 see the benefit of a forum vs. a mailing list, they seem pretty well 
 even to me, maybe a slight edge to the mailing list since it goes to my 
 mail client... I could see a good argument though for a forum that 
 supplies an RSS feed too.
 
 Frank
 
 Antony Stubbs wrote:
 Well it might have made sense if struts 2 issues were somehow applicable
 to
 struts 1, but they're mostly not. 
 
 For Struts 2 to be adopted, it needs to be clearly separated from struts
 1,
 as is the code base. This includes having clearly separate support to
 make
 it as easy as possible to find help. It's not like it's we want a struts
 1.5
 list. 2 is very different from 1. 
 
 What's the mentality for keeping them jumbled together?
 
 I suppose you don't see a separate mailing list for every major tapestry
 release, but this is a case of adopting the best process that fit's the
 situation, and in this situation the lists should be seperate IMO.
 
 
 Dave Newton-4 wrote:
 --- Antony Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This list seems to be quite busy, and I think
 everyone would benefit hugely from separating out
 the
 two frameworks for obvious reasons. Actually I'm
 surprised this hasn't been done already.
 It's been brought up (even by me) in the past; I still
 agree and would vote for separation if it was votable.

 d.



  
 
 Finding fabulous fares is fun.  
 Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight
 and
 hotel bargains.
 http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 
 
 -- 
 Frank W. Zammetti
 Founder and Chief Software Architect
 Omnytex Technologies
 http://www.omnytex.com
 AIM/Yahoo: fzammetti
 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Author of Practical Ajax Projects With Java Technology
   (2006, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-695-1)
 Java Web Parts - http://javawebparts.sourceforge.net
   Supplying the wheel, so you don't have to reinvent it!
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Can-we-*please*-havea-seperate-Struts-*2*---User-list--tf3556523.html#a9941601
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can we *please* havea seperate Struts *2* - User list?

2007-04-10 Thread Dave Newton
--- Antony Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This list seems to be quite busy, and I think
 everyone would benefit hugely from separating out
the
 two frameworks for obvious reasons. Actually I'm
 surprised this hasn't been done already.

It's been brought up (even by me) in the past; I still
agree and would vote for separation if it was votable.

d.



 

Finding fabulous fares is fun.  
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel 
bargains.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can we *please* havea seperate Struts *2* - User list?

2007-04-10 Thread Asaf Paris Mandoki

Wouldn't a forum be more appropriate for this kind of exchange?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can we *please* havea seperate Struts *2* - User list?

2007-04-10 Thread Antony Stubbs

Well it might have made sense if struts 2 issues were somehow applicable to
struts 1, but they're mostly not. 

For Struts 2 to be adopted, it needs to be clearly separated from struts 1,
as is the code base. This includes having clearly separate support to make
it as easy as possible to find help. It's not like it's we want a struts 1.5
list. 2 is very different from 1. 

What's the mentality for keeping them jumbled together?

I suppose you don't see a separate mailing list for every major tapestry
release, but this is a case of adopting the best process that fit's the
situation, and in this situation the lists should be seperate IMO.


Dave Newton-4 wrote:
 
 --- Antony Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This list seems to be quite busy, and I think
 everyone would benefit hugely from separating out
 the
 two frameworks for obvious reasons. Actually I'm
 surprised this hasn't been done already.
 
 It's been brought up (even by me) in the past; I still
 agree and would vote for separation if it was votable.
 
 d.
 
 
 
  
 
 Finding fabulous fares is fun.  
 Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and
 hotel bargains.
 http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Can-we-*please*-havea-seperate-Struts-*2*---User-list--tf3556523.html#a9930881
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can we *please* havea seperate Struts *2* - User list?

2007-04-10 Thread Antony Stubbs

I completely agree. In fact, I quite like the forum the Spring guys use. (esp
with the question / answered functionality).

I imagine a lot of people (as i do) treat this list as a forum, esp through
archives like Nabble.com which I use.


Asaf Paris Mandoki wrote:
 
 Wouldn't a forum be more appropriate for this kind of exchange?
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Can-we-*please*-havea-seperate-Struts-*2*---User-list--tf3556523.html#a9930890
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can we *please* havea seperate Struts *2* - User list?

2007-04-10 Thread Asaf Paris Mandoki

The webwork forum at www.opensymphony.com looks pretty good. Now that
webwork and struts 2 are almost the same thing, couldn't a special
forum for struts 2 be created over there?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can we *please* havea seperate Struts *2* - User list?

2007-04-10 Thread Zoran Avtarovski
+1 for using a forum. It saves having to archive the whole list locally to
keep track of threads. This is particularly relevant with S2 where we're
trying to keep track of latest issues and common pitfalls.

Z.

 
 I completely agree. In fact, I quite like the forum the Spring guys use. (esp
 with the question / answered functionality).
 
 I imagine a lot of people (as i do) treat this list as a forum, esp through
 archives like Nabble.com which I use.
 
 
 Asaf Paris Mandoki wrote:
 
 Wouldn't a forum be more appropriate for this kind of exchange?
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can we *please* havea seperate Struts *2* - User list?

2007-04-10 Thread Antony Stubbs

Seriously, have you tried
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=9930952framed=y ???


Zoran Avtarovski wrote:
 
 +1 for using a forum. It saves having to archive the whole list locally to
 keep track of threads. This is particularly relevant with S2 where we're
 trying to keep track of latest issues and common pitfalls.
 
 Z.
 
 
 I completely agree. In fact, I quite like the forum the Spring guys use.
 (esp
 with the question / answered functionality).
 
 I imagine a lot of people (as i do) treat this list as a forum, esp
 through
 archives like Nabble.com which I use.
 
 
 Asaf Paris Mandoki wrote:
 
 Wouldn't a forum be more appropriate for this kind of exchange?
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Can-we-*please*-havea-seperate-Struts-*2*---User-list--tf3556523.html#a9930968
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can we *please* havea seperate Struts *2* - User list?

2007-04-10 Thread Piero Sartini
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 01:49:01 Asaf Paris Mandoki wrote:
 Wouldn't a forum be more appropriate for this kind of exchange?

I am not sure. Personally I do prefer mailing lists. They save a lot of time, 
especially if you are subscribed to a lot of lists. Navigating to different 
forums is not what I would like to do every day. Just checking my inbox is 
much better :-)

But I know that a lot of users like web forums more than mailing lists. There 
was a discussion at the developer list about communicating a forum some time 
ago, but without result.

You can always use nabble as a forum interface to this list, its pretty good:
http://www.nabble.com/Struts---User-f206.html

Piero

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can we *please* havea seperate Struts *2* - User list?

2007-04-10 Thread Asaf Paris Mandoki

How could we get a forum?
Is there a way to get a place at opensymphony's forum dedicated to struts users?
What other alternatives are there?
How difficult would it be to get a forum at struts.apache.org ?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can we *please* havea seperate Struts *2* - User list?

2007-04-10 Thread Antony Stubbs

I don't think apache.org run forums, only moderate mailing lists. I think
they advocate using http://www.nabble.com/.

I think for a start, simply a separate list for Struts 2 would be a massive
help.


Asaf Paris Mandoki wrote:
 
 How could we get a forum?
 Is there a way to get a place at opensymphony's forum dedicated to struts
 users?
 What other alternatives are there?
 How difficult would it be to get a forum at struts.apache.org ?
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Can-we-*please*-havea-seperate-Struts-*2*---User-list--tf3556523.html#a9931142
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can we *please* havea seperate Struts *2* - User list?

2007-04-10 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
I think the thought behind not splitting the lists to this point is that 
Apache experience has been that it tends to divide a community rather 
than direct traffic in a more granular way.  The idea is that a Struts 
user is a Struts user regardless of version, and those that may not be 
using S2 today (yours truly included for the most part) may well be 
using it tomorrow... a person can get a leg-up just by keeping an eye on 
the S2 posts (I know that's true for me).  One could always subscribe to 
multiple lists of course, but in terms of community, a single united 
list theoretically at least yields more synergy.  This is my 
interpretation of things I've seen stated in the past (I happen to agree 
with it too :) ).  Maybe the thinking is different now by those who are 
in a position to change things, I don't know.


As for a forum, I seem to remember Apache infrastructure not supporting 
it, and I also seem to remember something about Apache projects not 
(directly at least) using outside resources... others more knowledgeable 
than I would have to answer this though... I can't off the top of my 
head think of any other Apache project that has a forum that is 
officially linked to the project.  As a personal opinion, I'm not sure I 
see the benefit of a forum vs. a mailing list, they seem pretty well 
even to me, maybe a slight edge to the mailing list since it goes to my 
mail client... I could see a good argument though for a forum that 
supplies an RSS feed too.


Frank

Antony Stubbs wrote:

Well it might have made sense if struts 2 issues were somehow applicable to
struts 1, but they're mostly not. 


For Struts 2 to be adopted, it needs to be clearly separated from struts 1,
as is the code base. This includes having clearly separate support to make
it as easy as possible to find help. It's not like it's we want a struts 1.5
list. 2 is very different from 1. 


What's the mentality for keeping them jumbled together?

I suppose you don't see a separate mailing list for every major tapestry
release, but this is a case of adopting the best process that fit's the
situation, and in this situation the lists should be seperate IMO.


Dave Newton-4 wrote:

--- Antony Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

This list seems to be quite busy, and I think
everyone would benefit hugely from separating out

the

two frameworks for obvious reasons. Actually I'm
surprised this hasn't been done already.

It's been brought up (even by me) in the past; I still
agree and would vote for separation if it was votable.

d.



 

Finding fabulous fares is fun.  
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and

hotel bargains.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]







--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
AIM/Yahoo: fzammetti
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author of Practical Ajax Projects With Java Technology
 (2006, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-695-1)
Java Web Parts - http://javawebparts.sourceforge.net
 Supplying the wheel, so you don't have to reinvent it!

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can we *please* havea seperate Struts *2* - User list?

2007-04-10 Thread Paul Benedict

While I understand that people want a separate mailing list, and at
times I believed the same thing, the fact is that most questions to
this list will be about 2.x. The reason is because, imo, 1.x has been
out for 7 years and virtually every possible question and answer has
been given -- there's simply not much of a need to ask if you can
already find your answer through an Internet search (like Google or
Nabble).

With that said, I also agree with Frank's point that separate mailing
lists also tend to divide the community. Believe it or not, there's
also one mailing list for Struts committers too -- so the Apache folks
who write Struts also get to see all the activity from 1.x and 2.x.
That's a good idea because we're one (read: ONE) community. Just as
Apache doesn't have a Tomcat 4 mailing list, a Tomcat 5, Tomcat 6, etc,
neither should we have here.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can we *please* havea seperate Struts *2* - User list?

2007-04-10 Thread Zoran Avtarovski
I have to agree with Frank and Paul. The list has been the best source of
current information on S2. We're using the WebWork in Action Book and other
resources but by far this mailing list has been the most valuable resource.

Z. 

 While I understand that people want a separate mailing list, and at
 times I believed the same thing, the fact is that most questions to
 this list will be about 2.x. The reason is because, imo, 1.x has been
 out for 7 years and virtually every possible question and answer has
 been given -- there's simply not much of a need to ask if you can
 already find your answer through an Internet search (like Google or
 Nabble).
 
 With that said, I also agree with Frank's point that separate mailing
 lists also tend to divide the community. Believe it or not, there's
 also one mailing list for Struts committers too -- so the Apache folks
 who write Struts also get to see all the activity from 1.x and 2.x.
 That's a good idea because we're one (read: ONE) community. Just as
 Apache doesn't have a Tomcat 4 mailing list, a Tomcat 5, Tomcat 6, etc,
 neither should we have here.
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]