RE: No Secondary Storage VM (was RE: Networking config question)
Hi Bryce, Unfortunately I cannot offer you any solution but I have been seeing the same issues on my configuration. When I setup the bridges prior to configuring the zone in the UI I get errors. If I don't setup the bridges prior to configuring the zone I get errors. . -Phil Philip Andrews Senior Linux Engineer T +1 603-625-2280 F +1 603-641-2280 M mailto:pandr...@thunderhead.com Thunderhead.com is the trading name of Thunderhead Limited which is registered in England under No. 4303041 whose registered office is at Catalyst House 720 Centennial Court, Centennial Park, Elstree, Herts. WD6 3SY. -- The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains confidential information. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. -- -Original Message- From: Nordgren, Bryce L -FS [mailto:bnordg...@fs.fed.us] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 4:22 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: No Secondary Storage VM (was RE: Networking config question) Hi Kirk, I'm trying for an advanced network, since it's a priority to keep wonky private IPs off of the University network. The configuration for guest/mgmt/public traffic, along with the bridge names/kvm traffic labels, is quoted below. I'll ignore the fact that the gui seems to consistently error (incorrectly) when provisioning a host. However, I think the lack of a storage server VM (which caused the alert state) is keeping me from registering ISOs and templates. They're just not downloading. I looked at the logfile you mentioned, and it appears to me that Cloudstack is designating the wrong network interface on the management server as private. (See: http://pastebin.com/tFUXGJcq) I particularly enjoy the phrase: Designating private to be nic publicbr0 However, I see absolutely no way to control this choice/fix the error. I've tried provisioning with and without a storage network, but the management network has always been tied to privatebr0 (not publicbr0). Likewise, when I explicitly put the storage network in there, it has been tied to privatebr0. I even added the network bridges on the management server just to see if that had an effect. (No) Cloudstack always picks the wrong interface on the management server, and there seems to be no way to correct it. Any thoughts? Bryce -Original Message- From: Kirk Kosinski [mailto:kirkkosin...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 5:54 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Nordgren, Bryce L -FS Subject: Re: Networking config question Hi, are you trying to use a basic zone (one flat network for all guests) or an advanced zone (one or more guest networks, each with their own VLAN)? I'm guessing advanced since I don't think a basic zone will work. For an advanced zone, you need to decide if the guest networks should be on publicbr0 or privatebr0. If you never plan to add a second host it doesn't really matter, but if you do plan on adding more hosts you should choose the bridge that is connected to a switch that supports VLANs. When going through the wizard, make sure to configure the traffic labels to the correct bridge name. If they are wrong it might be the problem. A blank error in the UI is not common but if the host is Up then it can probably be ignored. Errors in the UI are not usually useful anyway so check the management-server.log on the CloudStack server for errors (or upload it to Pastebin and ask on the list for help). The secondary storage alert is normal and can be ignored. Best regards, Kirk On 07/29/2013 03:16 PM, Nordgren, Bryce L -FS wrote: Host eth0: IP: 10.1.5.254; gw: 10.1.4.1; netmask: 255.255.254.0 Host eth1: IP: none; gw: none; netmask: none (however, it is plugged into the University's switch) Host bridges privatebr0 (eth0) and publicbr0 (eth1) created. Using KVM. Guest CIDR: 10.1.1.0/24 (the default provided by cloudstack) Management network: 10.1.4.30-10.1.4.50 (gw: 10.1.4.1; netmask: 255.255.254.0) Public traffic: 192.168.56.41-192.168.56.90 (gw:192.168.56.254; netmask: 255.255.255.0) Guest and Management traffic have privatebr0 KVM traffic label. Public traffic has publicbr0 KVM traffic label All VLAN fields have been left blank. This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for the intended recipients. Any unauthorized interception of this message or the use or disclosure of the information it contains may violate the law and subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. If you believe you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete the email immediately.
V4.1.0 w/ KVM Hyperv on CentOS6.4 + Adv Network + VLAN = no joy
I would appreciate help understanding why this StartCommand:
{StartCommand:{vm:{id:2,name:v-2-VM,type:ConsoleProxy,cpus:1,speed:500,minRam:1073741824,maxRam:1073741824,arch:x86_64,os:Debian
GNU/Linux 5.0 (32-bit),bootArgs: template=domP type=consoleproxy
host=10.10.0.250 port=8250 name=v-2-VM premium=true zone=1 pod=1 guid=Proxy.2
proxy_vm=2 disable_rp_filter=true eth2ip=67.211.104.52 eth2mask=255.255.255.240
gateway=***.***.***.62 eth0ip=169.254.3.184 eth0mask=255.255.0.0
eth1ip=10.10.0.246 eth1mask=255.255.255.0 mgmtcidr=10.10.0.0/24
localgw=10.10.0.254 internaldns1=10.10.0.253 internaldns2=10.10.0.254
dns1=66.212.224.241
dns2=66.212.224.242,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:false,limitCpuUse:false,vncPassword:69c7406d1126dbcb,params:{},uuid:a2863d9e-13c7-4f6b-b2eb-16fd9e050553,
disks:[
{id:2,name:ROOT-2,mountPoint:/mnt/vg_primary_raid1/primaryxfsraid/primary,path:6f51e106-8f3d-4a47-b010-9a81a6909aad,size:0,type:ROOT,storagePoolType:NetworkFilesystem,storagePoolUuid:0a37e7d0-4b3c-3668-9d7e-5aac1b552aca,deviceId:0}
] nics:[
{deviceId:2,networkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:true,uuid:6b8c3b95-a75a-4555-b775-c4578bbe4e9b,ip:***.***.***.52,netmask:255.255.255.240,gateway:***.***.***.62,mac:06:0e:32:00:01:06,dns1:***.***.224.241,dns2:***.***.224.242,broadcastType:Vlan,type:Public,broadcastUri:vlan://5,isolationUri:vlan://5,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:cloudpublic},
{deviceId:0,networkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,uuid:caec5b49-d139-4f05-8fb8-8b23b9bd1614,ip:169.254.3.184,netmask:255.255.0.0,gateway:169.254.0.1,mac:0e:00:a9:fe:03:b8,broadcastType:LinkLocal,type:Control,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false},
{deviceId:1,networkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,uuid:bc910056-23db-4259-8e4f-2006f5ac4275,ip:10.10.0.246,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:10.10.0.254,mac:06:9d:38:00:00:07,broadcastType:Native,type:Management,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:cloudmanagement}
]},
hostIp:10.10.0.1,wait:0}},{check.CheckSshCommand:{ip:169.254.3.184,port:3922,interval:6,retries:100,name:v-2-VM,wait:0}}
results in:
2013-07-31 04:09:02,849 INFO [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(secstorage-1:null) Unable to start VM on Host[-2-Routing] due to Failed to
create vnet 5: DEBUG op=add pif=eth4 vlanId=5 brName=breth4-5Set name-type for
VLAN subsystem. Should be visible in /proc/net/vlan/configdevice eth4.5 is
already a member of a bridge; can't enslave it to bridge breth4-5.Failed to add
vlan: eth4.5 to breth4-520
*** note *** I obscured the public addresses for obvious reasons, these are
known good, and worked fine with existing swtich configurationunder a V4.0.1
implementation
Background config information:
Advanced Network, VLAN isolation
2 Phys Networks, 1 for stor/mgmt, 1 for public/gueston the public/guest
network, KVM traffic labels are respectively cloudguest and cloudpublic
On the KVM hypervisor, cloudpublic is a bridge, eth4.5 is configured on that
bridge, VLAN 5 is set up in the switch
The physical network has an IP range defined for a small group of public
addresses, configured on VLAN 5
I have read through the code best I can to follow the path to attempt to
determine why the start command processing is not happywith the cloudpublic
bridge, and tries to create a breth4.5 bridge and enslave the eth4.5 interface
to it. Why not just use the cloudpublicbridge and carry on? Something is not
making sense to me here.
Any help appreciated.
Many thanks, Noel
Re: CS 4.1 + vSphere 5.1 - System VMs issue
I'll try and I'll let you know asap. Thanks a lot! Gaspare On 30/07/2013 19:59, Kelven Yang wrote: Could you check CS global configuration variable "host", make sure it point to the IP that management server is listening at (on Management network), if you have a management server cluster setup, this IP should be the load-balancer IP for the management server cluster Kelven On 7/29/13 10:14 PM, "Gaspare A Silvestri" g.silves...@netsons.com wrote: Hello everybody, I'm recently having issues about the ability to manage the system VMs (Console Proxy + Secondary Storage VM); I've got the following configuration: * Cloudstack 4.1 * VMware vSphere 5.1 * Standard networking configuration * vSwitch0 on the public network (Guest network) - Phyisical network connected to a WAN phyisical switch (public IP addresses - 46.x.x.x). * vSwitch1 on the private network (Management + Storage traffic) - Phyisical network connected to a LAN phyisical switch (Private IP addresses - 192.168.x.x). I'm able to connect to the System VMs from the Cloudstack Management server using the private assigned IP, and I'm also able to ping them, but I'm not able to connect to the console of both two VMs; it looks like something wrong in my network configuration. Where am I wrong in my activities? Thanks in advance, Gaspare -- Supernova s.r.l. Via G. Misiticoni, 3 65126 - Pescara ITALY www.netsons.com Gaspare A. Silvestri Technical Director - Head of IT VMWare VCP 4 - VMWare VCP 5 - Microsoft MCTS Oracle OCA 11g - Oracle SUN OCP - Symantec SCS t. (+39) 085 45 100 52 m. (+39) 334 13 682 11 e. g.silves...@netsons.com Netsons un marchio registrato dalla Supernova s.r.l. Le informazioni trasmesse sono riservate alla persona o alla societ indicata come destinatario, e possono includere contenuti considerati confidenziali. Ogni elaborazione, comunicazione, trasmissione o altro utilizzo, anche azioni conseguenti alla conoscenza di queste informazioni da parte di chiunque non sia espressamente indicato come destinatario proibita. Nel caso abbiate ricevuto per errore questa comunicazione, siete pregati di darne avviso a info [at] netsons.com ed eliminare ogni stampa ed ogni traccia informatica. Il ricevente dovr inoltre accertarsi che gli eventuali allegati non contengano virus prima di aprirli. Qualunque opinione o affermazione presentata in questo messaggio da ritenersi propria dell'autore e non rappresenta necessariamente la posizione della Societ. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact: info [at] netsons.com and delete the material from any computer. If this email contains attachments you should ensure they are checked for viruses before opening them. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.
Re: CS 4.1 + vSphere 5.1 - System VMs issue
Also, check the logs on CS host. I think relevant file is called catalina.out. On 31/7/13 3:50 PM, Gaspare A Silvestri wrote: I'll try and I'll let you know asap. Thanks a lot! Gaspare On 30/07/2013 19:59, Kelven Yang wrote: Could you check CS global configuration variable "host", make sure it point to the IP that management server is listening at (on Management network), if you have a management server cluster setup, this IP should be the load-balancer IP for the management server cluster Kelven On 7/29/13 10:14 PM, "Gaspare A Silvestri" g.silves...@netsons.com wrote: Hello everybody, I'm recently having issues about the ability to manage the system VMs (Console Proxy + Secondary Storage VM); I've got the following configuration: * Cloudstack 4.1 * VMware vSphere 5.1 * Standard networking configuration * vSwitch0 on the public network (Guest network) - Phyisical network connected to a WAN phyisical switch (public IP addresses - 46.x.x.x). * vSwitch1 on the private network (Management + Storage traffic) - Phyisical network connected to a LAN phyisical switch (Private IP addresses - 192.168.x.x). I'm able to connect to the System VMs from the Cloudstack Management server using the private assigned IP, and I'm also able to ping them, but I'm not able to connect to the console of both two VMs; it looks like something wrong in my network configuration. Where am I wrong in my activities? Thanks in advance, Gaspare -- Supernova s.r.l. Via G. Misiticoni, 3 65126 - Pescara ITALY www.netsons.com Gaspare A. Silvestri Technical Director - Head of IT VMWare VCP 4 - VMWare VCP 5 - Microsoft MCTS Oracle OCA 11g - Oracle SUN OCP - Symantec SCS t. (+39) 085 45 100 52 m. (+39) 334 13 682 11 e. g.silves...@netsons.com Netsons un marchio registrato dalla Supernova s.r.l. Le informazioni trasmesse sono riservate alla persona o alla societ indicata come destinatario, e possono includere contenuti considerati confidenziali. Ogni elaborazione, comunicazione, trasmissione o altro utilizzo, anche azioni conseguenti alla conoscenza di queste informazioni da parte di chiunque non sia espressamente indicato come destinatario proibita. Nel caso abbiate ricevuto per errore questa comunicazione, siete pregati di darne avviso a info [at] netsons.com ed eliminare ogni stampa ed ogni traccia informatica. Il ricevente dovr inoltre accertarsi che gli eventuali allegati non contengano virus prima di aprirli. Qualunque opinione o affermazione presentata in questo messaggio da ritenersi propria dell'autore e non rappresenta necessariamente la posizione della Societ. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact: info [at] netsons.com and delete the material from any computer. If this email contains attachments you should ensure they are checked for viruses before opening them. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.
Re: CS 4.1 + vSphere 5.1 - System VMs issue
Hi Noel, do you confirm that the value wrote by Kelven (Manager MGMT net IP) is the right address to configure? Thanks, Gaspare On 31/07/2013 16:03, Hotmail wrote: It does indeed have the correct configuration value
RE: CS 4.1 + vSphere 5.1 - System VMs issue
NO, actually, please ignore my reply. I replied to the wrong message. My deepest apologies for the confusion.Noel Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:13:41 +0200 From: g.silves...@netsons.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CS 4.1 + vSphere 5.1 - System VMs issue Hi Noel, do you confirm that the value wrote by Kelven (Manager MGMT net IP) is the right address to configure? Thanks, Gaspare On 31/07/2013 16:03, Hotmail wrote: It does indeed have the correct configuration value
need v-2--VM boot options parameter string for urgent maintenance
Hello, if anybody can send me the boot options string of your v-2-VM? you can get it in your xencenter? I need it for urgent maintenance. please let me know what version of cloudstack and xenserver you are using, for me, I use cloudstack 4.1 and xenserver 6.1. Great thanks. William This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier ?lectronique est confidentiel et prot?g?. L'exp?diteur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) d?sign?(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier ?lectronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser imm?diatement, par retour de courrier ?lectronique ou par un autre moyen.
Re: CS 4.1 + vSphere 5.1 - System VMs issue
No problems! :) Best regards, Gaspare On 31/07/2013 16:41, Noel Kendall wrote: NO, actually, please ignore my reply. I replied to the wrong message. My deepest apologies for the confusion.Noel Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:13:41 +0200 From: g.silves...@netsons.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CS 4.1 + vSphere 5.1 - System VMs issue Hi Noel, do you confirm that the value wrote by Kelven (Manager MGMT net IP) is the right address to configure? Thanks, Gaspare On 31/07/2013 16:03, Hotmail wrote: It does indeed have the correct configuration value
Re: need v-2--VM boot options parameter string for urgent maintenance
XenServer 6.1 and CS 4.2 -- quiet console=hvc0%template=domP%type=consoleproxy%host=10.147.59.194%port=8250%n ame=v-4-VM%premium=true%zone=2%pod=2%guid=Proxy.4%proxy_vm=4%disable_rp_fil ter=true%eth2ip=10.147.54.61%eth2mask=255.255.255.0%gateway=10.147.54.1%eth 0ip=169.254.0.198%eth0mask=255.255.0.0%eth1ip=10.147.40.78%eth1mask=255.255 .254.0%mgmtcidr=10.147.59.0/24%localgw=10.147.40.1%internaldns1=10.103.128. 16%dns1=10.103.128.16 On 31/07/13 8:52 PM, William Jiang william.ji...@manwin.com wrote: Hello, if anybody can send me the boot options string of your v-2-VM? you can get it in your xencenter? I need it for urgent maintenance. please let me know what version of cloudstack and xenserver you are using, for me, I use cloudstack 4.1 and xenserver 6.1. Great thanks. William This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier ?lectronique est confidentiel et prot?g?. L'exp?diteur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) d?sign?(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier ?lectronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser imm?diatement, par retour de courrier ?lectronique ou par un autre moyen.
Re: iSCSI IO performance is worse than NFS,why?
kvm -- Original -- From: Aaron Delpaaron.d...@citrix.com; Date: Wed, Jul 31, 2013 11:40 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgusers@cloudstack.apache.org; Subject: Re: iSCSI IO performance is worse than NFS,why? On 7/31/13 8:32 AM, WXR 1485739...@qq.com wrote: I find that the disk IO performance of vm instances on iSCSI(sharedmountpoint) primary storage is worse than that on NFS primary storage. When I use a single hdd and create a NFS share as primary storage,the disk IO performance is pretty good. But when I use the same hdd and create a iSCSI lun as primary storage,the disk IO performance is lower than NFS. I think the disk IO performance of iSCSI should be better than NFS. What hypervisor are you using to attach? .
Re: iSCSI IO performance is worse than NFS,why?
Sorry, I don't have enough KVM experience to comment or troubleshoot. On 7/31/13 9:00 AM, WXR 1485739...@qq.com wrote: kvm -- Original -- From: Aaron Delpaaron.d...@citrix.com; Date: Wed, Jul 31, 2013 11:40 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgusers@cloudstack.apache.org; Subject: Re: iSCSI IO performance is worse than NFS,why? On 7/31/13 8:32 AM, WXR 1485739...@qq.com wrote: I find that the disk IO performance of vm instances on iSCSI(sharedmountpoint) primary storage is worse than that on NFS primary storage. When I use a single hdd and create a NFS share as primary storage,the disk IO performance is pretty good. But when I use the same hdd and create a iSCSI lun as primary storage,the disk IO performance is lower than NFS. I think the disk IO performance of iSCSI should be better than NFS. What hypervisor are you using to attach? .
Web gui - id instead of name
Hi, after upgrade from 4.0 to 4.1 the new field name in instances menu shows id from vm instead of name. Can I correct this in the database without any problems? Regards Andreas Mit freundlichen Grüßen Andreas Huser Geschäftsführer System Engineer / Consultant (Cisco Certified Solaris, Linux) --- Zellerstraße 28 - 77654 Offenburg Tel: +49(781) 1278689 0 Mobil: +49(176) 10308549 ahu...@7five-edv.de
Re: iSCSI IO performance is worse than NFS,why?
Does your iSCSI primary storage offer better disk IO performance than NFS? -- Original -- From: Aaron Delpaaron.d...@citrix.com; Date: Thu, Aug 1, 2013 00:18 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgusers@cloudstack.apache.org; Subject: Re: iSCSI IO performance is worse than NFS,why? Sorry, I don't have enough KVM experience to comment or troubleshoot. On 7/31/13 9:00 AM, WXR 1485739...@qq.com wrote: kvm -- Original -- From: Aaron Delpaaron.d...@citrix.com; Date: Wed, Jul 31, 2013 11:40 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgusers@cloudstack.apache.org; Subject: Re: iSCSI IO performance is worse than NFS,why? On 7/31/13 8:32 AM, WXR 1485739...@qq.com wrote: I find that the disk IO performance of vm instances on iSCSI(sharedmountpoint) primary storage is worse than that on NFS primary storage. When I use a single hdd and create a NFS share as primary storage,the disk IO performance is pretty good. But when I use the same hdd and create a iSCSI lun as primary storage,the disk IO performance is lower than NFS. I think the disk IO performance of iSCSI should be better than NFS. What hypervisor are you using to attach? . .
Re: need v-2--VM boot options parameter string for urgent maintenance
You may get it inside console proxy VM with following command cat /proc/cmdline Kelven On 7/31/13 8:21 AM, William Jiang william.ji...@manwin.com wrote: Hello, if anybody can send me the boot options string of your v-2-VM? you can get it in your xencenter? I need it for urgent maintenance. please let me know what version of cloudstack and xenserver you are using, for me, I use cloudstack 4.1 and xenserver 6.1. Great thanks. William This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier ?lectronique est confidentiel et prot?g?. L'exp?diteur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) d?sign?(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier ?lectronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser imm?diatement, par retour de courrier ?lectronique ou par un autre moyen.
FW: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking
The KVM installation guide at http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Installation_Guide/hypervisor-kvm-install-flow.html , is unnecessary complicated and inaccurate. For example, we don't need to configure vlan on kvm host by users themselves, cloudstack-agent will create vlans automatically. All users need to do is to create bridges(if the default bridge created by cloudstack-agent is not enough), then add these bridge names from cloudstack mgt server UI during the zone creation. -Original Message- From: Noel Kendall [mailto:noeldkend...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 9:49 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking The documentation for installation in a KVM environment is utterly misleading. The documentation reads as though one can set up the bridge for the public network with any name one chooses, the default being cloudbr0. You cannot use just any old name. That simply will not work. Let's suppose I have a public network that I isolate on VLAN 5, which is interfaced on ethernet adapter eth4. I will need to define an adapter eth4.5 with VLAN set to yes. So far, so good. Next, for the bridge... By enabling debugging output in the log, I was able to see that the code looks for a bridge with the name cloudVirBr5 for my public network. I had tried several different approaches, none would work if I did not name my bridge cloudVirBr5, and set my traffic label on the network configurationto the same. I have seen numerous posts in the mailing lists, blog entries, you name it, representing frustrations of throngs of users trying to validate a CS setup. The documentation is utterly wrong and misleading. Summary: does not work:traffic label: cloudbr0 with eth4.5 pointing to cloudbr0 - code still tries to create a breth4.5 and enlist eth4.5 to it but cannot because it is already enlisted to cloudbr0. Good luck everyone with advanced networking with VLAN isolation on CentOS KVM hosts.
Re: FW: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking
Yes, that's correct. I think we need to update the documentation. The user simply needs to create a bridge where 'public' traffic will work, and then set that bridge name as the traffic label for public traffic. Then it will create the vlan device and the bridge necessary for public based on the physical ethernet device of that bridge. Note, in this example, it is only looking for cloudVirBr for compatibility, if there are existing cloudVirBr bridges then the agent will continue to create cloudVirBr bridges, otherwise, it will create breth bridges, which allow the same vlan number on different physical interfaces. We can easily create some concrete examples for this... such as the one represented in devcloud-kvm by tools/devcloud-kvm/devcloud-kvm-advanced.cfg On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote: The KVM installation guide at http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Installation_Guide/hypervisor-kvm-install-flow.html , is unnecessary complicated and inaccurate. For example, we don't need to configure vlan on kvm host by users themselves, cloudstack-agent will create vlans automatically. All users need to do is to create bridges(if the default bridge created by cloudstack-agent is not enough), then add these bridge names from cloudstack mgt server UI during the zone creation. -Original Message- From: Noel Kendall [mailto:noeldkend...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 9:49 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking The documentation for installation in a KVM environment is utterly misleading. The documentation reads as though one can set up the bridge for the public network with any name one chooses, the default being cloudbr0. You cannot use just any old name. That simply will not work. Let's suppose I have a public network that I isolate on VLAN 5, which is interfaced on ethernet adapter eth4. I will need to define an adapter eth4.5 with VLAN set to yes. So far, so good. Next, for the bridge... By enabling debugging output in the log, I was able to see that the code looks for a bridge with the name cloudVirBr5 for my public network. I had tried several different approaches, none would work if I did not name my bridge cloudVirBr5, and set my traffic label on the network configurationto the same. I have seen numerous posts in the mailing lists, blog entries, you name it, representing frustrations of throngs of users trying to validate a CS setup. The documentation is utterly wrong and misleading. Summary: does not work:traffic label: cloudbr0 with eth4.5 pointing to cloudbr0 - code still tries to create a breth4.5 and enlist eth4.5 to it but cannot because it is already enlisted to cloudbr0. Good luck everyone with advanced networking with VLAN isolation on CentOS KVM hosts.
Re: FW: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking
Here too, we've been working through a cloudstack install on a 3 box test environment for almost a week with 95% of the issues being networking due to poor documentation. I'd be happy to follow some new procedures and provide feedback. Also running CentOS 6.4 on all boxes. -Phil On 07/31/2013 03:00 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote: If you need an ignorant person with a lot of CentOS system admin experience to walk through the procedure with the authors, let me know. I have a bare CentOS 6.4 ready to be made into something that runs CloudStack and supports a CentOS VM. If that works, I can rustle up another piece of hardware with a bare CentOS to add to the confusion. Ron On 31/07/2013 2:33 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: Yes, that's correct. I think we need to update the documentation. The user simply needs to create a bridge where 'public' traffic will work, and then set that bridge name as the traffic label for public traffic. Then it will create the vlan device and the bridge necessary for public based on the physical ethernet device of that bridge. Note, in this example, it is only looking for cloudVirBr for compatibility, if there are existing cloudVirBr bridges then the agent will continue to create cloudVirBr bridges, otherwise, it will create breth bridges, which allow the same vlan number on different physical interfaces. We can easily create some concrete examples for this... such as the one represented in devcloud-kvm by tools/devcloud-kvm/devcloud-kvm-advanced.cfg On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote: The KVM installation guide at http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Installation_Guide/hypervisor-kvm-install-flow.html , is unnecessary complicated and inaccurate. For example, we don't need to configure vlan on kvm host by users themselves, cloudstack-agent will create vlans automatically. All users need to do is to create bridges(if the default bridge created by cloudstack-agent is not enough), then add these bridge names from cloudstack mgt server UI during the zone creation. Philip Andrews Senior Linux Engineer T +1 603-625-2280 F +1 603-641-2280 M mailto:pandr...@thunderhead.com Thunderhead.com is the trading name of Thunderhead Limited which is registered in England under No. 4303041 whose registered office is at Catalyst House 720 Centennial Court, Centennial Park, Elstree, Herts. WD6 3SY. -- The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains confidential information. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. -- -Original Message- From: Noel Kendall [mailto:noeldkend...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 9:49 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking The documentation for installation in a KVM environment is utterly misleading. The documentation reads as though one can set up the bridge for the public network with any name one chooses, the default being cloudbr0. You cannot use just any old name. That simply will not work. Let's suppose I have a public network that I isolate on VLAN 5, which is interfaced on ethernet adapter eth4. I will need to define an adapter eth4.5 with VLAN set to yes. So far, so good. Next, for the bridge... By enabling debugging output in the log, I was able to see that the code looks for a bridge with the name cloudVirBr5 for my public network. I had tried several different approaches, none would work if I did not name my bridge cloudVirBr5, and set my traffic label on the network configurationto the same. I have seen numerous posts in the mailing lists, blog entries, you name it, representing frustrations of throngs of users trying to validate a CS setup. The documentation is utterly wrong and misleading. Summary: does not work:traffic label: cloudbr0 with eth4.5 pointing to cloudbr0 - code still tries to create a breth4.5 and enlist eth4.5 to it but cannot because it is already enlisted to cloudbr0. Good luck everyone with advanced networking with VLAN isolation on CentOS KVM hosts.
RE: FW: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking
+1 Working 1/2 time for about two weeks now, trying to install on a two-box test environment. Let me test something that works! I vote for describing a super simple test case: + two boxes + two networks + minimize impact on public network (no VLAN requirements; no private IPs on public network hardware, etc.) I'm using the StackIQ Rocks+Cloud distribution. (RHEL/CentOS 6.4; Cloudstack 4.0.2) Bryce -Original Message- From: Philip Andrews [mailto:pandr...@thunderhead.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 1:14 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; rwhee...@artifact-software.com Subject: Re: FW: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking Here too, we've been working through a cloudstack install on a 3 box test environment for almost a week with 95% of the issues being networking due to poor documentation. I'd be happy to follow some new procedures and provide feedback. Also running CentOS 6.4 on all boxes. -Phil On 07/31/2013 03:00 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote: If you need an ignorant person with a lot of CentOS system admin experience to walk through the procedure with the authors, let me know. I have a bare CentOS 6.4 ready to be made into something that runs CloudStack and supports a CentOS VM. If that works, I can rustle up another piece of hardware with a bare CentOS to add to the confusion. Ron On 31/07/2013 2:33 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: Yes, that's correct. I think we need to update the documentation. The user simply needs to create a bridge where 'public' traffic will work, and then set that bridge name as the traffic label for public traffic. Then it will create the vlan device and the bridge necessary for public based on the physical ethernet device of that bridge. Note, in this example, it is only looking for cloudVirBr for compatibility, if there are existing cloudVirBr bridges then the agent will continue to create cloudVirBr bridges, otherwise, it will create breth bridges, which allow the same vlan number on different physical interfaces. We can easily create some concrete examples for this... such as the one represented in devcloud-kvm by tools/devcloud-kvm/devcloud-kvm-advanced.cfg On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote: The KVM installation guide at http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Installation_Guide/hypervisor-kvm-install-flow.html , is unnecessary complicated and inaccurate. For example, we don't need to configure vlan on kvm host by users themselves, cloudstack-agent will create vlans automatically. All users need to do is to create bridges(if the default bridge created by cloudstack-agent is not enough), then add these bridge names from cloudstack mgt server UI during the zone creation. Philip Andrews Senior Linux Engineer T +1 603-625-2280 F +1 603-641-2280 M mailto:pandr...@thunderhead.com Thunderhead.com is the trading name of Thunderhead Limited which is registered in England under No. 4303041 whose registered office is at Catalyst House 720 Centennial Court, Centennial Park, Elstree, Herts. WD6 3SY. -- The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains confidential information. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. -- -Original Message- From: Noel Kendall [mailto:noeldkend...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 9:49 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking The documentation for installation in a KVM environment is utterly misleading. The documentation reads as though one can set up the bridge for the public network with any name one chooses, the default being cloudbr0. You cannot use just any old name. That simply will not work. Let's suppose I have a public network that I isolate on VLAN 5, which is interfaced on ethernet adapter eth4. I will need to define an adapter eth4.5 with VLAN set to yes. So far, so good. Next, for the bridge... By enabling debugging output in the log, I was able to see that the code looks for a bridge with the name cloudVirBr5 for my public network. I had tried several different approaches, none would work if I did not name my bridge cloudVirBr5, and set my traffic label on the network configurationto the same. I have seen numerous posts in the mailing lists, blog entries, you name it, representing frustrations of throngs of users trying to validate a CS setup. The documentation is utterly wrong and misleading. Summary: does not work:traffic label: cloudbr0 with eth4.5 pointing to cloudbr0 - code still tries to create a
Third-party Cloudstack Support
My company is considering Cloudstack for cloud management. One of the considerations is whether or not we can find a company we can reach out to for technical support. We need 24/7 support, SLA, and are willing to pay for such service. Would some point me in the direction of such a company(ies)? Thanks!
Re: AWS API setup
Looks like I'm on my own here
I poked around the cloudstack-setup-databases script and the sql it uses
drops the tables before recreating them so it is not safe for me to run
that or it will kill my current cloud db.
In that script I did find references to the cloud-bridge sql files found
here:
# ls -l /usr/share/cloudstack-bridge/setup/
total 56
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1592 Jun 4 11:45 cloudbridge_bucketpolicy.sql
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1148 Jun 4 11:45 cloudbridge_db.sql
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3711 Jun 4 11:45 cloudbridge_index.sql
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1170 Jun 4 11:45 cloudbridge_multipart_alter.sql
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2468 Jun 4 11:45 cloudbridge_multipart.sql
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 896 Jun 4 11:45 cloudbridge_offering_alter.sql
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1551 Jun 4 11:45 cloudbridge_offering.sql
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 897 Jun 4 11:45 cloudbridge_policy_alter.sql
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4462 Jun 4 11:45 cloudbridge_schema.sql
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2365 Jun 4 11:45 deploy-db-bridge.sh
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1377 Jun 4 11:45 init_db.bat
I noticed the deploy-db-bridge.sh, so I ran it and now I have a cloudbridge
db.
Please note that this will set the cloud db user pw to cloud, so if you
used a different pw make sure to:
mysql set password for 'cloud'@'%' = password('mypw');
mysql set password for 'cloud'@'localhost' = password('mypw');
or your management server will not start.
I then ran into this bug:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3295
but I am on 4.1 not 4.2.
Searching for xes.keystore I I found this in the debian install rules:
for i in cloud-bridge.properties commons-logging.properties
crypto.properties xes.keystore ec2-service.properties; do \
mv $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/$(PACKAGE)-bridge/webapps/awsapi/WEB-INF/classes/
$$i $(DESTDIR)/$(SYSCONFDIR)/$(PACKAGE)/management/; \.
Which is moving the files to /etc/cloudstack/management. So I moved these
2 back:
# mv /etc/cloudstack/management/xes.keystore
/usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps7080/awsapi/WEB-INF/classes/.
# mv /etc/cloudstack/management/crypto.properties
/usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps7080/awsapi/WEB-INF/classes/.
Is this a bug in the debian packager?
Now when I run the cloudstack-aws-api-register script I get:
User registration failed with http error code: 401
The awsapi.log shows:
2013-07-31 12:16:11,245 ERROR [bridge.service.EC2RestServlet]
(catalina-exec-int-1:null) SetUserKeys Entity already exists:
javax.persistence.EntityExistsException: Entity already exists:
at
com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.persist(GenericDaoBase.java:1340)
at
com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125)
at
com.cloud.bridge.service.EC2RestServlet.setUserKeys(EC2RestServlet.java:395)
at
com.cloud.bridge.service.EC2RestServlet.doGetOrPost(EC2RestServlet.java:243)
at
com.cloud.bridge.service.EC2RestServlet.doGet(EC2RestServlet.java:218)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:617)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.invoke(ApplicationDispatcher.java:646)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.processRequest(ApplicationDispatcher.java:436)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doForward(ApplicationDispatcher.java:374)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.forward(ApplicationDispatcher.java:302)
at
com.cloud.bridge.service.EC2MainServlet.doGetOrPost(EC2MainServlet.java:105)
at
com.cloud.bridge.service.EC2MainServlet.doGet(EC2MainServlet.java:84)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:617)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127)
at
org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102)
at
org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:615)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)
at
org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:293)
at
RE: Cloudstack Virtual Router
Router VM in my case: Eth1 - guest net Eth2 - mgmt net -Original Message- From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:34 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Cloudstack Virtual Router Anton, Perhaps you can define all 3 nics and what nics/networks they use and what the issue is. My SSVM on vSphere uses: Eth1 - Mgmt net Eth2 - Public net Eth3 - Storage net Regards ilya -Original Message- From: Anton Rubets [mailto:plejik@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 6:12 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Cloudstack Virtual Router Hello everyone! I have problem with autoconfig network by CS 4.1 for VR. When CS starting the router it gives 3 nic. One of this nic is public traffic. But it gives ip from public, in the configuration public, but in XCP1.6 create with management vlan. Someone have problem like this? Thx
RE: Change host password??
Yes, the documentation needs to be updated... , but Host passwd can be updated easily using Cloudmonkey , I just updated 30 xenserver hosts using cloudmonkey 1. setup cloudmonkey 2. get the hostid and clusterid and then update the host passwd .. for ex update hostpassword clusterid= cluster id hostid= hostid password=xx username=root list hosts count = 6 host: id = 0c9b4c8f-69d5-42b3-b02f-fd987da670ed name = cld-test-pod1-xen6. capabilities = xen-3.0-x86_64 , xen-3.0-x86_32p , hvm-3.0-x86_32 , hvm-3.0-x86_32p , hvm-3.0-x86_64 clusterid = 793a4b28-070d-4f31-982b-3c973608bdb1 clustername = pod1-cluster1 update hostpassword clusterid=ec483b01-2387-xxx-94e487fbe4e9 hostid=bcfba758- password=xx username=root More information on cloudmonkey is below https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/cloudstack-cloudmonkey-cli.html Prashant Sreedharan Cloudstack XenServer Administrator , Ops T: +1 805 690 3486 | M: +1 805 453 9105 prashant.sreedha...@citrix.com Powering mobile workstyles and cloud services -Original Message- From: Kirk Jantzer [mailto:kirk.jant...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:17 PM To: Cloudstack users mailing list Subject: Change host password?? http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Admin_Guide/change-host-password.html This document says to update the password column, which doesn't exist in the host table. Is this a document bug? -- Regards, Kirk Jantzer http://about.met/kirkjantzer
Re: Third-party Cloudstack Support
Hi Chris, http://www.shapeblue.com/ supply consultancy for the product. I have heard great things about their training sessions. On 31 July 2013 21:48, Bryan Whitehead dri...@megahappy.net wrote: If you are really looking to just buy a solution all packaged up then I'd take a look at what Citrix has: http://www.citrix.com/products/cloudplatform/overview.html and https://www.citrix.com/buy/citrix-cloud-advisors.html -Bryan On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Chris Buono cbu...@paragusit.com wrote: My company is considering Cloudstack for cloud management. One of the considerations is whether or not we can find a company we can reach out to for technical support. We need 24/7 support, SLA, and are willing to pay for such service. Would some point me in the direction of such a company(ies)? Thanks!
RE: FW: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking
There are 10 open Doc bugs against the KVM docs. Whoever does rewrite this chapter might want to consult those items for ideas. If your issues aren't included there, please do file an additional bug with your valuable input! https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CLOUDSTACK%20AND%20component%20in%20(doc%2C%20Doc)%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Ready%20To%20Review%22)%20AND%20text%20~%20%22kvm%22 Jessica T. From: Nordgren, Bryce L -FS [bnordg...@fs.fed.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 1:22 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: FW: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking +1 Working 1/2 time for about two weeks now, trying to install on a two-box test environment. Let me test something that works! I vote for describing a super simple test case: + two boxes + two networks + minimize impact on public network (no VLAN requirements; no private IPs on public network hardware, etc.) I'm using the StackIQ Rocks+Cloud distribution. (RHEL/CentOS 6.4; Cloudstack 4.0.2) Bryce -Original Message- From: Philip Andrews [mailto:pandr...@thunderhead.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 1:14 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; rwhee...@artifact-software.com Subject: Re: FW: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking Here too, we've been working through a cloudstack install on a 3 box test environment for almost a week with 95% of the issues being networking due to poor documentation. I'd be happy to follow some new procedures and provide feedback. Also running CentOS 6.4 on all boxes. -Phil On 07/31/2013 03:00 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote: If you need an ignorant person with a lot of CentOS system admin experience to walk through the procedure with the authors, let me know. I have a bare CentOS 6.4 ready to be made into something that runs CloudStack and supports a CentOS VM. If that works, I can rustle up another piece of hardware with a bare CentOS to add to the confusion. Ron On 31/07/2013 2:33 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: Yes, that's correct. I think we need to update the documentation. The user simply needs to create a bridge where 'public' traffic will work, and then set that bridge name as the traffic label for public traffic. Then it will create the vlan device and the bridge necessary for public based on the physical ethernet device of that bridge. Note, in this example, it is only looking for cloudVirBr for compatibility, if there are existing cloudVirBr bridges then the agent will continue to create cloudVirBr bridges, otherwise, it will create breth bridges, which allow the same vlan number on different physical interfaces. We can easily create some concrete examples for this... such as the one represented in devcloud-kvm by tools/devcloud-kvm/devcloud-kvm-advanced.cfg On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote: The KVM installation guide at http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Installation_Guide/hypervisor-kvm-install-flow.html , is unnecessary complicated and inaccurate. For example, we don't need to configure vlan on kvm host by users themselves, cloudstack-agent will create vlans automatically. All users need to do is to create bridges(if the default bridge created by cloudstack-agent is not enough), then add these bridge names from cloudstack mgt server UI during the zone creation. Philip Andrews Senior Linux Engineer T +1 603-625-2280 F +1 603-641-2280 M mailto:pandr...@thunderhead.com Thunderhead.com is the trading name of Thunderhead Limited which is registered in England under No. 4303041 whose registered office is at Catalyst House 720 Centennial Court, Centennial Park, Elstree, Herts. WD6 3SY. -- The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains confidential information. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. -- -Original Message- From: Noel Kendall [mailto:noeldkend...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 9:49 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking The documentation for installation in a KVM environment is utterly misleading. The documentation reads as though one can set up the bridge for the public network with any name one chooses, the default being cloudbr0. You cannot use just any old name. That simply will not work. Let's suppose I have a public network that I isolate on VLAN 5, which is interfaced on ethernet adapter eth4. I will
Re: Change host password??
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3990 On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Kirk Jantzer kirk.jant...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks Prashant. Will do Jessica. On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Jessica Tomechak jessica.tomec...@citrix.com wrote: Sounds like a document bug to me. Please file it in the bugbase! Jessica T. From: Kirk Jantzer [kirk.jant...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:17 PM To: Cloudstack users mailing list Subject: Change host password?? http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Admin_Guide/change-host-password.html This document says to update the password column, which doesn't exist in the host table. Is this a document bug? -- Regards, Kirk Jantzer http://about.met/kirkjantzer -- Regards, Kirk Jantzer c: (678) 561-5475 http://about.met/kirkjantzer -- Regards, Kirk Jantzer c: (678) 561-5475 http://about.met/kirkjantzer
