cloudstack 4.1.1 部署安装后，系统VM 查看控制台报超时
您好： 目前我部署了cloudstack 4.1.1 系统，部署如下 一台物理理 安装 cloudstack 管理+NFS，另一台 安装cloudstack agent + KVM。 目前作基本网络设置好后，两个系统VM 都自动运行，并且状肪是 Running 状态。 发现，点 系统的VM 的查看控制台，出来的界面，报超时异常。（个人认为是VNC网络不通）， 接着尝试把 装 cloudstack 管理+NFS 的服务器iptables 服务关掉，把安装cloudstack agent + KVM 的服务器iptables 服务关掉，发现就好使了。运行一段进间了，由于安装cloudstack agent + KVM 的服务器iptables 会由cloudstack 自动开启，就发现又不报超时了。 我在 安装cloudstack agent + KVM的服务器 增加了如下的防火墙策略， $ iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT $ iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 1798 -j ACCEPT $ iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 16509 -j ACCEPT $ iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 5900:6100 -j ACCEPT $ iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 49152:49216 -j ACCEPT 增加完策略后，也一样是会报超时。请问，还需要增加什么防火墙策略？ cloudstackfqa2013
RE: VM snapshot is not enabled for hypervisor type: KVM
This is not supported. -Original Message- From: Anju M R [mailto:anjumr...@gmail.com] Sent: 09 December 2013 11:28 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: VM snapshot is not enabled for hypervisor type: KVM Hi I tried to create a Snapshot, but got the message as VM snapshot is not enabled for hypervisor type: KVM I changed the kvm.snapshot.enabled = true, and restarted the management server. Then also its not working. -- Thanks, Anju M R
Re: VM snapshot is not enabled for hypervisor type: KVM
kvm.snapshot.enabled is to enable volume snapshots not VM snapshots. ~Talluri On 09/12/13 1:39 pm, Suresh Sadhu suresh.sa...@citrix.com wrote: kvm.snapshot.enabled
Can't launch instance on local storage from ISO
Hi, I'm trying to launch an instance from a FreeBSD ISO on local primary storage and it fails all the time. It works fine if I launch it with shared primary storage. The logs seem to hint to capacity issues, but this is hardly the case, there is plenty of room on both my hypervisors.. (more logs here http://tmp.nux.ro/jkR-management-server.log ) 2013-12-09 09:31:49,520 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 2 suitable hosts 2013-12-09 09:31:49,522 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) Checking suitable pools for volume (Id, Type): (40,ROOT) 2013-12-09 09:31:49,522 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) We need to allocate new storagepool for this volume 2013-12-09 09:31:49,522 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) Calling StoragePoolAllocators to find suitable pools 2013-12-09 09:31:49,523 DEBUG [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) LocalStoragePoolAllocator trying to find storage pool to fit the vm 2013-12-09 09:31:49,526 DEBUG [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) LocalStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools 2013-12-09 09:31:49,526 DEBUG [storage.allocator.ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator looking for storage pool 2013-12-09 09:31:49,526 DEBUG [storage.allocator.ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator to find storage pool 2013-12-09 09:31:49,526 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) No suitable pools found for volume: Vol[40|vm=33|ROOT] under cluster: 1 2013-12-09 09:31:49,526 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) No suitable pools found 2013-12-09 09:31:49,526 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) No suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 1 2013-12-09 09:31:49,532 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) Could not find suitable Deployment Destination for this VM under any clusters, returning. 2013-12-09 09:31:49,532 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1 2013-12-09 09:31:49,533 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this Zone: 1 2013-12-09 09:31:49,535 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) Removing from the clusterId list these clusters from avoid set: [1] 2013-12-09 09:31:49,536 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) No clusters found after removing disabled clusters and clusters in avoid list, returning. 2013-12-09 09:31:49,568 DEBUG [cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) Destroying vm VM[User|fbsdtestlocal] as it failed to create on Host with Id:null 2013-12-09 09:31:49,580 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) VM state transitted from :Stopped to Error with event: OperationFailedToErrorvm's original host id: null new host id: null host id before state transition: null 2013-12-09 09:31:49,595 WARN [apache.cloudstack.alerts] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) alertType:: 8 // dataCenterId:: 1 // podId:: null // clusterId:: null // message:: Failed to deploy Vm with Id: 33, on Host with Id: null 2013-12-09 09:31:49,622 INFO [user.vm.DeployVMCmd] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|fbsdtestlocal]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1 2013-12-09 09:31:49,623 INFO [user.vm.DeployVMCmd] (Job-Executor-1:job-96 = [ 9051a50a-53ff-4752-b079-5ba48a03e0ef ]) Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|fbsdtestlocal] com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for
Re: Portable IPs question
You would need an additional IP range. On 06/12/13 3:33 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, just to ask if Portable IP range (that an admin defines) can overlap with Guest IP range (public IP addresses). Or do I need additional IP range outside that ? Thanks, -- Andrija Panić
Re: Build debs for 4.2.1
Graeme, I copying Wido who has been building the debs -sebastien On Dec 9, 2013, at 1:05 PM, Graeme Lambert glamb...@adepteo.net wrote: Hi, I don't suppose anyone has any feedback on this? Best regards Graeme Lambert lhead_header.jpg Address: Adepteo Limited 24 Market Street Tottington Bury BL8 4AD Map Web: http://www.adepteo.net Tel/SMS: 0161 710 3000 - Switchboard Tel/SMS: 0161 710 2000 - Support Fax: 0161 710 3019 Find us on twitter.gif facebook.gif linkedin.gif BestInternetTelephony.gif Finalist 2012 On 06/12/13 15:59, Graeme Lambert wrote: Hi, Have the build instructions for deb packages for 4.2.1 changed? I tried to follow these instructions http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/sect-source-builddebs.html and when I first ran dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us I got an error saying mvc command not found I tracked that down to ./debian/rules and changed line 38 from mvn clean package -Pawsapi -DskipTests -Dsystemvm \ to mvn3 clean package -Pawsapi -DskipTests -Dsystemvm \ Afterwhich the buildpackage appeared to be successful until 9mins later I got this: [INFO] Total time: 9:37.284s [INFO] Finished at: Fri Dec 06 15:55:22 GMT 2013 [INFO] Final Memory: 73M/485M [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) on project cloud-awsapi: Compilation failure: Compilation failure: [ERROR] error: error reading /root/.m2/repository/org/apache/axis2/mex/1.5.4/mex-1.5.4-impl.jar; error in opening zip file [ERROR] error: error reading /root/.m2/repository/org/apache/axis2/axis2-mtompolicy/1.5.4/axis2-mtompolicy-1.5.4.jar; error in opening zip file [ERROR] error: error reading /root/.m2/repository/org/apache/ws/commons/axiom/axiom-dom/1.2.10/axiom-dom-1.2.10.jar; error in opening zip file [ERROR] error: error reading /root/.m2/repository/org/opensaml/opensaml1/1.1/opensaml1-1.1.jar; error in opening zip file [ERROR] error: error reading /root/.m2/repository/commons-lang/commons-lang/2.3/commons-lang-2.3.jar; error in opening zip file [ERROR] - [Help 1] [ERROR] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch. [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging. [ERROR] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles: [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoFailureException [ERROR] [ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the command [ERROR] mvn goals -rf :cloud-awsapi make: *** [build-indep-stamp] Error 1 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 Can someone advise on where I'm going wrong please? -- Best regards Graeme Lambert Mail Attachment.jpeg Address: Adepteo Limited 24 Market Street Tottington Bury BL8 4AD Map Web: http://www.adepteo.net Tel/SMS: 0161 710 3000 - Switchboard Tel/SMS: 0161 710 2000 - Support Fax: 0161 710 3019 Find us on Mail Attachment.gif Mail Attachment.gif Mail Attachment.gif Mail Attachment.gif Finalist 2012
Re: Build debs for 4.2.1
Hmm, odd. That should work, but on Debian it might be a issue. The packages are supposed to work under Ubuntu, Debian is not really tested with these packages. Aliassen or symlinking mvn3 to mvn should work. Wido On 12/09/2013 01:21 PM, sebgoa wrote: Graeme, I copying Wido who has been building the debs -sebastien On Dec 9, 2013, at 1:05 PM, Graeme Lambert glamb...@adepteo.net wrote: Hi, I don't suppose anyone has any feedback on this? Best regards Graeme Lambert lhead_header.jpg Address: Adepteo Limited 24 Market Street Tottington Bury BL8 4AD Map Web: http://www.adepteo.net Tel/SMS: 0161 710 3000 - Switchboard Tel/SMS: 0161 710 2000 - Support Fax: 0161 710 3019 Find us on twitter.gif facebook.gif linkedin.gif BestInternetTelephony.gif Finalist 2012 On 06/12/13 15:59, Graeme Lambert wrote: Hi, Have the build instructions for deb packages for 4.2.1 changed? I tried to follow these instructions http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/sect-source-builddebs.html and when I first ran dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us I got an error saying mvc command not found I tracked that down to ./debian/rules and changed line 38 from mvn clean package -Pawsapi -DskipTests -Dsystemvm \ to mvn3 clean package -Pawsapi -DskipTests -Dsystemvm \ Afterwhich the buildpackage appeared to be successful until 9mins later I got this: [INFO] Total time: 9:37.284s [INFO] Finished at: Fri Dec 06 15:55:22 GMT 2013 [INFO] Final Memory: 73M/485M [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) on project cloud-awsapi: Compilation failure: Compilation failure: [ERROR] error: error reading /root/.m2/repository/org/apache/axis2/mex/1.5.4/mex-1.5.4-impl.jar; error in opening zip file [ERROR] error: error reading /root/.m2/repository/org/apache/axis2/axis2-mtompolicy/1.5.4/axis2-mtompolicy-1.5.4.jar; error in opening zip file [ERROR] error: error reading /root/.m2/repository/org/apache/ws/commons/axiom/axiom-dom/1.2.10/axiom-dom-1.2.10.jar; error in opening zip file [ERROR] error: error reading /root/.m2/repository/org/opensaml/opensaml1/1.1/opensaml1-1.1.jar; error in opening zip file [ERROR] error: error reading /root/.m2/repository/commons-lang/commons-lang/2.3/commons-lang-2.3.jar; error in opening zip file [ERROR] - [Help 1] [ERROR] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch. [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging. [ERROR] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles: [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoFailureException [ERROR] [ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the command [ERROR] mvn goals -rf :cloud-awsapi make: *** [build-indep-stamp] Error 1 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 Can someone advise on where I'm going wrong please? -- Best regards Graeme Lambert Mail Attachment.jpeg Address: Adepteo Limited 24 Market Street Tottington Bury BL8 4AD Map Web: http://www.adepteo.net Tel/SMS: 0161 710 3000 - Switchboard Tel/SMS: 0161 710 2000 - Support Fax: 0161 710 3019 Find us on Mail Attachment.gif Mail Attachment.gif Mail Attachment.gif Mail Attachment.gif Finalist 2012
CloudStack 4.2 Advance zone - KVM hypervisor
Hello, is it possible to add a second network interface to a zone? The zone was originally configured with one interface for management one for guest network. I would like to add another network interface to the hypervisor, it this possible? Thanks,
RE: 4.2.1 anytime soon?
Do we have any projected dates for the official 4.2.1 release yet? I understand that there's an ACL disclosure issue that is under discussion as a potential blocker but I can't quite work out whether there has been any progress on this. -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 27 November 2013 18:11 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon? On Nov 27, 2013, at 6:52 PM, Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk wrote: Hi Sebastien, Thanks for the reply and the link - I never knew about that option. Are these RPMs likely to be upgrade-safe if I configure the mgmt. server with the relevant yum repo at a later date? These rpms are built from the 4.2 branch, so they represent the latest on that branch and may differ slightly (be ahead ~4.2.2) from what we voted on for 4.2.1 I have not tried that type of upgrade, which If I understand you right, may actually be a 'downgrade'. That said it should only be bug fix changes so the schemas should not change. My advice would be to wait couple days for the official 4.2.1 but if you are eager you can grab those rpms and start ironing out your upgrade procedure (from where you are at to ~4.2.1) on your dev systems. Cheers, Adrian -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 27 November 2013 17:33 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon? On Nov 27, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk wrote: Hi All, Hoping that someone here might know what's holding up the release of 4.2.1? A vote was cast back on the 12th Nov which appeared to be all fine with everyone eventually. Citrix have released Cloudplatform 4.2.1. As far as I can tell, the only thing missing was finalising the release notes but these too seem to be finished. Has CCCEU13 killed off all of the momentum to release 4.2.1 or is there something else going on that I've missed? You have not missed anything. It's just lack of time in the day to check the final docs, make the release announcement etc.. I appreciate that beggars can't be choosers but I'm too scared to try building from source and am eagerly awaiting the 'easy' option of having RPMs made from an officially sanctioned release. You can always get the latest rpms from: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.2/job/package-rhel63-4.2/ Even though they are not the official release ones (and won't be since we only release source tar ball) Any info on this welcomed. Many thanks, Adrian
RE: 4.2.1 anytime soon?
From what I understood, they hope to respin RC today for a second vote. -Original Message- From: Adrian Lewis [mailto:adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 10:23 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: 4.2.1 anytime soon? Do we have any projected dates for the official 4.2.1 release yet? I understand that there's an ACL disclosure issue that is under discussion as a potential blocker but I can't quite work out whether there has been any progress on this. -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 27 November 2013 18:11 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon? On Nov 27, 2013, at 6:52 PM, Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk wrote: Hi Sebastien, Thanks for the reply and the link - I never knew about that option. Are these RPMs likely to be upgrade-safe if I configure the mgmt. server with the relevant yum repo at a later date? These rpms are built from the 4.2 branch, so they represent the latest on that branch and may differ slightly (be ahead ~4.2.2) from what we voted on for 4.2.1 I have not tried that type of upgrade, which If I understand you right, may actually be a 'downgrade'. That said it should only be bug fix changes so the schemas should not change. My advice would be to wait couple days for the official 4.2.1 but if you are eager you can grab those rpms and start ironing out your upgrade procedure (from where you are at to ~4.2.1) on your dev systems. Cheers, Adrian -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 27 November 2013 17:33 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon? On Nov 27, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk wrote: Hi All, Hoping that someone here might know what's holding up the release of 4.2.1? A vote was cast back on the 12th Nov which appeared to be all fine with everyone eventually. Citrix have released Cloudplatform 4.2.1. As far as I can tell, the only thing missing was finalising the release notes but these too seem to be finished. Has CCCEU13 killed off all of the momentum to release 4.2.1 or is there something else going on that I've missed? You have not missed anything. It's just lack of time in the day to check the final docs, make the release announcement etc.. I appreciate that beggars can't be choosers but I'm too scared to try building from source and am eagerly awaiting the 'easy' option of having RPMs made from an officially sanctioned release. You can always get the latest rpms from: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.2/job/package-rhel63-4.2/ Even though they are not the official release ones (and won't be since we only release source tar ball) Any info on this welcomed. Many thanks, Adrian
RE: 4.2.1 anytime soon?
Cool thanks -Original Message- From: Conrad Geiger [mailto:cgei...@it1solutions.com] Sent: 09 December 2013 15:28 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: 4.2.1 anytime soon? From what I understood, they hope to respin RC today for a second vote. -Original Message- From: Adrian Lewis [mailto:adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 10:23 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: 4.2.1 anytime soon? Do we have any projected dates for the official 4.2.1 release yet? I understand that there's an ACL disclosure issue that is under discussion as a potential blocker but I can't quite work out whether there has been any progress on this. -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 27 November 2013 18:11 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon? On Nov 27, 2013, at 6:52 PM, Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk wrote: Hi Sebastien, Thanks for the reply and the link - I never knew about that option. Are these RPMs likely to be upgrade-safe if I configure the mgmt. server with the relevant yum repo at a later date? These rpms are built from the 4.2 branch, so they represent the latest on that branch and may differ slightly (be ahead ~4.2.2) from what we voted on for 4.2.1 I have not tried that type of upgrade, which If I understand you right, may actually be a 'downgrade'. That said it should only be bug fix changes so the schemas should not change. My advice would be to wait couple days for the official 4.2.1 but if you are eager you can grab those rpms and start ironing out your upgrade procedure (from where you are at to ~4.2.1) on your dev systems. Cheers, Adrian -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 27 November 2013 17:33 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon? On Nov 27, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk wrote: Hi All, Hoping that someone here might know what's holding up the release of 4.2.1? A vote was cast back on the 12th Nov which appeared to be all fine with everyone eventually. Citrix have released Cloudplatform 4.2.1. As far as I can tell, the only thing missing was finalising the release notes but these too seem to be finished. Has CCCEU13 killed off all of the momentum to release 4.2.1 or is there something else going on that I've missed? You have not missed anything. It's just lack of time in the day to check the final docs, make the release announcement etc.. I appreciate that beggars can't be choosers but I'm too scared to try building from source and am eagerly awaiting the 'easy' option of having RPMs made from an officially sanctioned release. You can always get the latest rpms from: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.2/job/package-rhel63-4.2/ Even though they are not the official release ones (and won't be since we only release source tar ball) Any info on this welcomed. Many thanks, Adrian
Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon?
Hi, Just in case you aren't aware, you can build 4.2.1 yourself via https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.1/ However, you'll see from my Build debs for 4.2.1 thread that I'm having a bit of difficulty in doing so at the moment. Best regards *Graeme Lambert* On 09/12/13 15:22, Adrian Lewis wrote: Do we have any projected dates for the official 4.2.1 release yet? I understand that there's an ACL disclosure issue that is under discussion as a potential blocker but I can't quite work out whether there has been any progress on this. -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 27 November 2013 18:11 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon? On Nov 27, 2013, at 6:52 PM, Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk wrote: Hi Sebastien, Thanks for the reply and the link - I never knew about that option. Are these RPMs likely to be upgrade-safe if I configure the mgmt. server with the relevant yum repo at a later date? These rpms are built from the 4.2 branch, so they represent the latest on that branch and may differ slightly (be ahead ~4.2.2) from what we voted on for 4.2.1 I have not tried that type of upgrade, which If I understand you right, may actually be a 'downgrade'. That said it should only be bug fix changes so the schemas should not change. My advice would be to wait couple days for the official 4.2.1 but if you are eager you can grab those rpms and start ironing out your upgrade procedure (from where you are at to ~4.2.1) on your dev systems. Cheers, Adrian -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 27 November 2013 17:33 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon? On Nov 27, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk wrote: Hi All, Hoping that someone here might know what's holding up the release of 4.2.1? A vote was cast back on the 12th Nov which appeared to be all fine with everyone eventually. Citrix have released Cloudplatform 4.2.1. As far as I can tell, the only thing missing was finalising the release notes but these too seem to be finished. Has CCCEU13 killed off all of the momentum to release 4.2.1 or is there something else going on that I've missed? You have not missed anything. It's just lack of time in the day to check the final docs, make the release announcement etc.. I appreciate that beggars can't be choosers but I'm too scared to try building from source and am eagerly awaiting the 'easy' option of having RPMs made from an officially sanctioned release. You can always get the latest rpms from: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.2/job/package-rhel63-4.2/ Even though they are not the official release ones (and won't be since we only release source tar ball) Any info on this welcomed. Many thanks, Adrian
Initial setup admin password not working
So I’ve done the install twice thinking I did something wrong the first time, but twice in a row now when I do a fresh install I get the error about the password being incorrect. WARN [server.auth.SHA256SaltedUserAuthenticator] (catalina-exec-1:) The stored password for admin isn't in the right format for this authenticator INFO [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-1:) User admin is disabled/locked I read one post that said it had to do with 2GB of RAM in their case, so I bumped mine from 1 to 4GB and that didn’t help, I’ve tried resetting the password from instructions I found about updating the user and user_view tables, but so far no luck. So something seems wrong with the initial out-of-the-box setup, but not sure where else to look. Ideas? Dan
RE: Initial setup admin password not working
Dan, did you bump the ram to 2GB before or after your first login attempt? The reason I ask is its the database deploy/upgrade process that runs the first time you try and login which needs the RAM, if you did not have sufficient RAM is would have failed and the databases would not have been deployed correctly. If you need to start again, just drop the DB schema and then re-deploy the database. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Daniel Wittenberg [mailto:dwittenberg2...@gmail.com] Sent: 09 December 2013 18:17 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Initial setup admin password not working So I've done the install twice thinking I did something wrong the first time, but twice in a row now when I do a fresh install I get the error about the password being incorrect. WARN [server.auth.SHA256SaltedUserAuthenticator] (catalina-exec-1:) The stored password for admin isn't in the right format for this authenticator INFO [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-1:) User admin is disabled/locked I read one post that said it had to do with 2GB of RAM in their case, so I bumped mine from 1 to 4GB and that didn't help, I've tried resetting the password from instructions I found about updating the user and user_view tables, but so far no luck. So something seems wrong with the initial out-of-the-box setup, but not sure where else to look. Ideas? Dan This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Initial setup admin password not working
I couldn’t remember exactly when I changed it, so I just dropped the cloud, cloud_usage and cloudbridge databases, restarted mysql, re-ran the cloudstack-setup-databases script, restarted everything again, and same error. Should that have done it? Dan On Dec 9, 2013, at 12:29 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Dan, did you bump the ram to 2GB before or after your first login attempt? The reason I ask is its the database deploy/upgrade process that runs the first time you try and login which needs the RAM, if you did not have sufficient RAM is would have failed and the databases would not have been deployed correctly. If you need to start again, just drop the DB schema and then re-deploy the database. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Daniel Wittenberg [mailto:dwittenberg2...@gmail.com] Sent: 09 December 2013 18:17 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Initial setup admin password not working So I've done the install twice thinking I did something wrong the first time, but twice in a row now when I do a fresh install I get the error about the password being incorrect. WARN [server.auth.SHA256SaltedUserAuthenticator] (catalina-exec-1:) The stored password for admin isn't in the right format for this authenticator INFO [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-1:) User admin is disabled/locked I read one post that said it had to do with 2GB of RAM in their case, so I bumped mine from 1 to 4GB and that didn't help, I've tried resetting the password from instructions I found about updating the user and user_view tables, but so far no luck. So something seems wrong with the initial out-of-the-box setup, but not sure where else to look. Ideas? Dan This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: Isolated Network with no Services
works using the api. thanks. Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -Original Message- From: Murali Reddy [murali.re...@citrix.com] Received: Tuesday, 10 Dec 2013, 12:42am To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org [d...@cloudstack.apache.org]; users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org] Subject: Re: Isolated Network with no Services From the UI yes, you can try with API directly. On 09/12/13 12:19 PM, Simon Murphy simon.mur...@vifx.co.nz wrote: I can successfully create the network offering with no services, however when I go to deploy it is not listed under the available network offerings.Seems like only Isolated Networks with SourceNAT enabled are displayedŠis this correct? Simon Murphy Solutions Architect ViFX | Cloud Infrastructure Level 7, 57 Fort Street, Auckland, New Zealand 1010 PO Box 106700, Auckland, New Zealand 1143 M +64 21 285 4519 | S simon_a_murphy www.vifx.co.nzhttp://www.vifx.co.nz http://www.vifx.co.nz/ follow us on twitter https://twitter.com/ViFX Auckland | Wellington | Christchurch experience. expertise. execution. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, without prejudice and may contain information that is subject to legal privilege. It is intended solely for the use of the individual/s to whom it is addressed in accordance with the provisions of the Privacy Act (1993). The content contained in this email does not, necessarily, reflect the official policy position of ViFX nor does ViFX have any responsibility for any alterations to the contents of this email that may occur following transmission. If you are not the addressee it may be unlawful for you to read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use the information contained within this email. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender prior to deleting this email message from your system. Please note ViFX reserves the right to monitor, from time to time, the communications sent to and from its email network. On 3/12/13 6:29 PM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote: HTH http://blog.remibergsma.com/2012/03/10/howto-create-a-network-in-cloudsta c k-without-a-virtual-router/ From: Simon Murphy simon.mur...@vifx.co.nzmailto:simon.mur...@vifx.co.nz Reply-To: d...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:d...@cloudstack.apache.org d...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:d...@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Tuesday, 3 December 2013 8:15 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org, d...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:d...@cloudstack.apache.org d...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Isolated Network with no Services Is it possible to configure a network offering for an isolated network that has no services? I would like to give the customer the option to create a network that is totally isolated (no L3 connectivity) so that they can bring their own software router/firewall. The isolated network would be connected to other networks via the customers virtual router. I can create the network offering however it is not listed as an available service when I try to create the network. Cheers, Simon Simon Murphy Solutions Architect ViFX | Cloud Infrastructure Level 7, 57 Fort Street, Auckland, New Zealand 1010 PO Box 106700, Auckland, New Zealand 1143 M +64 21 285 4519 | S simon_a_murphy www.vifx.co.nzhttp://www.vifx.co.nz/ follow us on twitterhttps://twitter.com/ViFX Auckland | Wellington | Christchurch [cid:image003.jpg@01CDDF95.815BF160] experience. expertise. execution. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, without prejudice and may contain information that is subject to legal privilege. It is intended solely for the use of the individual/s to whom it is addressed in accordance with the provisions of the Privacy Act (1993). The content contained in this email does not, necessarily, reflect the official policy position of ViFX nor does ViFX have any responsibility for any alterations to the contents of this email that may occur following transmission. If you are not the addressee it may be unlawful for you to read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use the information contained within this email. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender prior to deleting this email message from your system. Please note ViFX reserves the right to monitor, from time to time, the communications sent to and from its email network.
RE: Initial setup admin password not working
After deploying the DBs, rebooting, and then launching the UI, it can take a couple of minutes before the login will be successful. Have you given it enough time to fully initialise? A good tip is to run the following when starting the management service tail -f /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log | grep success When you see the message 'Cluster manager was started successfully' you should be able to login, but not before. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Daniel Wittenberg [mailto:dwittenberg2...@gmail.com] Sent: 09 December 2013 18:41 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Initial setup admin password not working I couldn't remember exactly when I changed it, so I just dropped the cloud, cloud_usage and cloudbridge databases, restarted mysql, re-ran the cloudstack-setup-databases script, restarted everything again, and same error. Should that have done it? Dan On Dec 9, 2013, at 12:29 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Dan, did you bump the ram to 2GB before or after your first login attempt? The reason I ask is its the database deploy/upgrade process that runs the first time you try and login which needs the RAM, if you did not have sufficient RAM is would have failed and the databases would not have been deployed correctly. If you need to start again, just drop the DB schema and then re-deploy the database. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Daniel Wittenberg [mailto:dwittenberg2...@gmail.com] Sent: 09 December 2013 18:17 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Initial setup admin password not working So I've done the install twice thinking I did something wrong the first time, but twice in a row now when I do a fresh install I get the error about the password being incorrect. WARN [server.auth.SHA256SaltedUserAuthenticator] (catalina-exec-1:) The stored password for admin isn't in the right format for this authenticator INFO [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-1:) User admin is disabled/locked I read one post that said it had to do with 2GB of RAM in their case, so I bumped mine from 1 to 4GB and that didn't help, I've tried resetting the password from instructions I found about updating the user and user_view tables, but so far no luck. So something seems wrong with the initial out-of-the-box setup, but not sure where else to look. Ideas? Dan This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Issue in accessing Windows and Linux VM
Hi All, Can someone please tell me how to add drivers to the windows VM created from windows ISO? Also please tell me how to configure this windows VM to make it accessible via RDP. And what all changes I need to make on linux vm to make it accessible via putty? Thanks in advance. Regards, Jitendra
Re: Initial setup admin password not working
Tailing that log I see a new warning after restarting: WARN [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:null) Failed to inject generated public key into systemvm iso sudo: no tty present and no askpass program specified I did update sudoers per instructions: Defaults:cloud !requiretty Since this is a test box I just gave the cloud use NOPASSWD in sudo and that fixed it, though obviously not the right answer. Dan On Dec 9, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: After deploying the DBs, rebooting, and then launching the UI, it can take a couple of minutes before the login will be successful. Have you given it enough time to fully initialise? A good tip is to run the following when starting the management service tail -f /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log | grep success When you see the message 'Cluster manager was started successfully' you should be able to login, but not before. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Daniel Wittenberg [mailto:dwittenberg2...@gmail.com] Sent: 09 December 2013 18:41 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Initial setup admin password not working I couldn't remember exactly when I changed it, so I just dropped the cloud, cloud_usage and cloudbridge databases, restarted mysql, re-ran the cloudstack-setup-databases script, restarted everything again, and same error. Should that have done it? Dan On Dec 9, 2013, at 12:29 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Dan, did you bump the ram to 2GB before or after your first login attempt? The reason I ask is its the database deploy/upgrade process that runs the first time you try and login which needs the RAM, if you did not have sufficient RAM is would have failed and the databases would not have been deployed correctly. If you need to start again, just drop the DB schema and then re-deploy the database. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Daniel Wittenberg [mailto:dwittenberg2...@gmail.com] Sent: 09 December 2013 18:17 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Initial setup admin password not working So I've done the install twice thinking I did something wrong the first time, but twice in a row now when I do a fresh install I get the error about the password being incorrect. WARN [server.auth.SHA256SaltedUserAuthenticator] (catalina-exec-1:) The stored password for admin isn't in the right format for this authenticator INFO [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-1:) User admin is disabled/locked I read one post that said it had to do with 2GB of RAM in their case, so I bumped mine from 1 to 4GB and that didn't help, I've tried resetting the password from instructions I found about updating the user and user_view tables, but so far no luck. So something seems wrong with the initial out-of-the-box setup, but not sure where else to look. Ideas? Dan This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
duplicate system UUID's with KVM
I have 3 independent Cloudstack installs. One is 3.0.x and the others are 4.1.0. Using KVM (i'm only using KVM so I don't have anything else for comparison), between 3.0.x and 4.1.0 I'm getting instances with UUID's that are the same. I get the UUID by running this on the console (CentOS): dmidecode -s system-uuid Here is example output from 1 host: [root@fortress ~]# dmidecode -s system-uuid C1260F04-F171-3136-85A7-F0B77699DA33 [root@fortress ~]# ifconfig eth0 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 06:9A:36:00:00:AF inet addr:removed Bcast:70.33.251.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::49a:36ff:fe00:af/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:20586 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1796 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:1764556 (1.6 MiB) TX bytes:197329 (192.7 KiB) here is another: [root@db-sla01 ~]# dmidecode -s system-uuid C1260F04-F171-3136-85A7-F0B77699DA33 [root@db-sla01 ~]# ifconfig eth0 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 06:5E:9A:00:00:C9 inet addr:removed Bcast:64.13.168.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::45e:9aff:fe00:c9/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:7644414 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:3073765 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:735505477 (701.4 MiB) TX bytes:519743789 (495.6 MiB) NOTE: The IP's are not in the same nor in the same subnet The time between creation is pretty long... weeks. Any ideas? I've just been killing VM's that have collisions with UUID's but it happens pretty often. -Bryan
cloudstack + vmware
I was reading through the docs now that I have a basic setup going and it appears that you can’t really have CS manage a current VMware environment, if I read this right: “Make sure the hypervisor hosts do not have any VMs already running before you add them to CloudStack” So if there now way to just bring CS into an existing environment to take over management or do you really have to build a new environment with it? Thanks! Dan
SRX/ASA and ACS VPC
Is it possible to offload firewall, SourceNAT and inter-VLAN routing functions to hardware devices for VPC networks? Simon Murphy Solutions Architect ViFX | Cloud Infrastructure Level 7, 57 Fort Street, Auckland, New Zealand 1010 PO Box 106700, Auckland, New Zealand 1143 M +64 21 285 4519 | S simon_a_murphy www.vifx.co.nzhttp://www.vifx.co.nz/ follow us on twitterhttps://twitter.com/ViFX Auckland | Wellington | Christchurch [cid:image003.jpg@01CDDF95.815BF160] experience. expertise. execution. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, without prejudice and may contain information that is subject to legal privilege. It is intended solely for the use of the individual/s to whom it is addressed in accordance with the provisions of the Privacy Act (1993). The content contained in this email does not, necessarily, reflect the official policy position of ViFX nor does ViFX have any responsibility for any alterations to the contents of this email that may occur following transmission. If you are not the addressee it may be unlawful for you to read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use the information contained within this email. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender prior to deleting this email message from your system. Please note ViFX reserves the right to monitor, from time to time, the communications sent to and from its email network.
Re: Password reset feature and User Data service
Any info on this one ? Do I need to stop ALL the VMs that are using this shared netowrk, in order to update it with new offering... ? On 5 December 2013 17:10, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: I should add:I can see the edit button on Isolated netowrks already deployed and in use buy some VMs...but have only 1 shred netowrk, and no edit button for it... On 5 December 2013 17:08, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: From the http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html-single/Installation_Guide/index.html#change-network-offering-on-guest-network There should be the edit button on the network, but I dont see it, only the restart and delete netowrk buttons...This shared network is shared type, defined vlan ID, and has DNS/DHCP as the services provided by Virtual Router... Not sure why I don't see the edit button... On 5 December 2013 09:57, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Sanjeev for inputs. Can you please confirm that updating network is possible only from API - I can not find it anywhere in GUI ? Also how should I handle VLAN assigment to this shared network - now vlan 500 is assigned...I suppose when updating the network (with the new networking template), that already deployed network should retain it's vlan and IP ranges, right ? Thank you very much... On 5 December 2013 06:15, Sanjeev Neelarapu sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, Create another network offering with dhcp,dns and userdata service and undate the shared network with these offerings. While doing the network update choose not to change the network cidr. Thanks, Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 3:31 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Password reset feature and User Data service Hi, I have kind of problem and need advice please. I have 1 shared network for assigning public IP addresses to all VMs we create - with DHCP,DNS, and Virtual Router, as the services that are enabled in this networking tempalte. Now I want to enable password management/reset features, but I got error messages user data service is not enabled for my network id=212. So since modifications of Network tempalte is not possible, and the modification of the already deployed Network (id=212) is not possible is there a change to hack the database to include the User Data service as the service in both the netowrk template, and for the already used network (id=212) Any help would be really appriciated... Thanks, -- Andrija Panić -- Andrija Panić -- http://admintweets.com -- -- Andrija Panić -- http://admintweets.com -- -- Andrija Panić -- http://admintweets.com -- -- Andrija Panić -- http://admintweets.com --
RE: cloudstack + vmware
that functionality does not exist, and it is a big problem for us too. hopefully someone is working on it. Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -Original Message- From: Daniel Wittenberg [dwittenberg2...@gmail.com] Received: Tuesday, 10 Dec 2013, 11:28am To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org] Subject: cloudstack + vmware I was reading through the docs now that I have a basic setup going and it appears that you can’t really have CS manage a current VMware environment, if I read this right: “Make sure the hypervisor hosts do not have any VMs already running before you add them to CloudStack” So if there now way to just bring CS into an existing environment to take over management or do you really have to build a new environment with it? Thanks! Dan
Re: duplicate system UUID's with KVM
What is the OS of the KVM host? I believe vm uuids are type 4 uuids and are hence independent of time. http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/UUID.html On 12/9/13 12:01 PM, Bryan Whitehead dri...@megahappy.net wrote: I have 3 independent Cloudstack installs. One is 3.0.x and the others are 4.1.0. Using KVM (i'm only using KVM so I don't have anything else for comparison), between 3.0.x and 4.1.0 I'm getting instances with UUID's that are the same. I get the UUID by running this on the console (CentOS): dmidecode -s system-uuid Here is example output from 1 host: [root@fortress ~]# dmidecode -s system-uuid C1260F04-F171-3136-85A7-F0B77699DA33 [root@fortress ~]# ifconfig eth0 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 06:9A:36:00:00:AF inet addr:removed Bcast:70.33.251.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::49a:36ff:fe00:af/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:20586 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1796 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:1764556 (1.6 MiB) TX bytes:197329 (192.7 KiB) here is another: [root@db-sla01 ~]# dmidecode -s system-uuid C1260F04-F171-3136-85A7-F0B77699DA33 [root@db-sla01 ~]# ifconfig eth0 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 06:5E:9A:00:00:C9 inet addr:removed Bcast:64.13.168.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::45e:9aff:fe00:c9/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:7644414 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:3073765 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:735505477 (701.4 MiB) TX bytes:519743789 (495.6 MiB) NOTE: The IP's are not in the same nor in the same subnet The time between creation is pretty long... weeks. Any ideas? I've just been killing VM's that have collisions with UUID's but it happens pretty often. -Bryan
