Re: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue

2015-12-11 Thread Cristian Ciobanu
I removed the URL and i did a re-upload of the screenshots because i forgot to 
hide some IP. ( also one of the server was compromised )


NEW URL: http://imgur.com/a/0qmvx


Regards,
Cristian
www.istream.today [http://www.istream.today/]
www.shape.host [http://www.shape.host/]
+40.733.955.922
 
On 12/11/2015 7:09:57 PM, Cristian Ciobanu  wrote:
Please see the screenshots from following URL: http://imgur.com/a/Fbbyi

Thank you.


Regards,
Cristian

 
On 12/11/2015 5:38:30 PM, Nux!  wrote:
Cristian,

The mailing list seems to be stripping attachments, you might want to upload 
the pictures somewhere on the web and share the link.

I tried adding a bogus new subnet to my existing 4.6 testbed and it worked 
without problems, I could give instances IP from it.

You might want to go through the management logs (don't forget to enable DEBUG) 
while you are trying to use the new IPs on the instance.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Cristian Ciobanu"
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 13:40:26
> Subject: Re: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue

> First of all, thanks for the answer.
>
> This is how i did, was work before on CloudStack 4.5 I'm not sure if this is a
> 4.6 issue or i did something wrong.
>
> Please see the attached screenshots.
>
> If you see on VR.jpg the class starting with 149. works great but 158. not. 
> also
> the if you see the screenshot for VM TST2, everything is fine, but  for VM 
> TST3
> not, no IP was allocated on VM.
>
> Thank you!
>
>
> Regards,
> Cristian
>
> 
> On 12/11/2015 3:07:34 PM, Nux! wrote:
> Cristian,
>
> In a Basic Network you only have one public interface on the VR, as well as
> 169.254 on eth1 - that's a link-local address used to communicate with the HV.
> -
> To add a new subnet to your network you must go to Home - Infrastructure - 
> Zones
> - Your Zone - Physical Network - Your Public Network - Guest - Network - click
> existing network - View IP Ranges - Add IP Range ... (it's actually simpler
> from the API/cloudmonkey).
>
> Once you have added it your VR should start using it at some point, especially
> if you have exhausted your current subnet.
> You can check what IP it passed out to instances in /etc/dhcphosts.txt
>
> HTH
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Cristian Ciobanu"
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 12:17:23
>> Subject: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>    I try to find the issue regarding additional IP class.
>>
>>    I have a CloudStack 4.6 on CentOS 6.7 ( 1x MGMT server and one KVM host 
>>with
>>    basic network )
>>
>>    Everything works fine till i try to add a additional guest IP class the
>>     additional is not working also i don't see any changes on VR and I have 
>>only 1
>>    NIC with GUEST traffic on the VR, does not matter if i add 1,2,3 etc.. 
>>guest IP
>>    class i don't see any updates on my VR also if i create a new VM the IP 
>>looks
>>    like is allocated in CloudStack web interface but no IP allocated on the 
>>VM
>>    side.
>>
>>    Can i get some help regarding this ?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
> > Cristian


Re: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1

2015-12-11 Thread Remi Bergsma
Hi, 

This week a bug has been fixed in the private gateway. It just missed the 4.6.1 
release. 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1184

It will be included in both 4.6.2 and 4.7.0. 

You may build packages from the 4.6 branch and give those a go (packaging 
folder). Also integration tests have been improved to make sure it won't break 
again without noticing. 

Regards, Remi 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 11 Dec 2015, at 15:13, Kaushik Bora  wrote:
> 
> VPC private gateway static route is not created in VR.. However its
> reflecting on UI. But there is no entry on static_route table...using ip
> route show table static_route.
> 
> Regards
> Kaushik


RE: Unable to add hosts

2015-12-11 Thread Somesh Naidu
See if updating nss package on your management server helps resolve this.

(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-users/201511.mbox/%3c5a4fe8efa8c8584cbefeeacd9aa077ee61228...@sinpex01cl02.citrite.net%3E)

Somesh
CloudPlatform Escalations
Citrix Systems, Inc.

-Original Message-
From: sayed jahed hussini [mailto:sjahed_hussini...@yahoo.com.INVALID] 
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 11:18 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Unable to add hosts

I installed cloudstack using this guide:
Quick Installation Guide for CentOS 6 — Apache CloudStack Installation 
Documentation 4.6.0 documentation
Everything went without any errors. But I am unable to add hosts. In 
/var/log/cloudstack/agent/agent.log I got the following error:
INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (main:null) Connecting to 10.1.1.2:8250ERROR 
[utils.nio.NioConnection] (main:null) Unable to initalize the 
threads.java.io.IOException: Connection closed with -1 on reading size..
Also in /var/log/cloudstack/management/setupManagement.log i got the following 
errors:
DEBUG:root:execute:iptables-save|grep INPUT| grep -w 8080DEBUG:root:Failed to 
execute:
DEBUG:root:execute:iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8080 -j 
ACCEPTDEBUG:root:execute:iptables-save|grep INPUT| grep -w 8250
DEBUG:root:Failed to execute:DEBUG:root:execute:iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m tcp 
--dport 8250 -j ACCEPT

best,Jay

|   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
| Quick Installation Guide for CentOS 6 — Apache CloudStack Installation 
Documentation 4.6.0 documenta...NFS Our configuration is going to use NFS for 
both primary and secondary storage. We are going to go ahead and setup two NFS 
shares for those purposes. We’llstart out by installing nfs-utils.  |
|  |
| View on cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org | Preview by Yahoo |
|  |
|   |




Re: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1

2015-12-11 Thread Kaushik Bora
Hi Audrey,

  I have done this, it’s showing with route -n….

  But not in route show table static_route. Strange issue.

For any clarification please do revert.

Kaushik Bora

Consultant - Networks & Cloud  
  
A-98, LGF, C.R.Park, New Delhi - 110019  
O +91 11 4055 1411 | M +91 97111 00076  
www.indiqus.com  





This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and/or 
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete the original 
message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is 
strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been obtained for such 
action. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the 
sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep e-mail and attachments 
for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are virus-free and accepts no 
liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses.


On 12 December 2015 at 12:26:07 AM, Audrey Roberto B Baldin 
(audrey.bal...@unitelco.com.br) wrote:

Hello Kaushik.

I had added the route accessing the terminal for the VR and adding the route 
manually as you would do in any linux system:

route add -net [REMOTE NETWORK] netmask [REMOTE NETMASK] gw [GATEWAY IP] dev 
[VR GW INTERFACE]

After doing it, chek if the route exist ussin the command ip route

Hope this help!


Audrey

De: "Kaushik Bora" 
Para: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" 
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 11 de Dezembro de 2015 16:44:00
Assunto: Re: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1

Hi Audrey,

  Could you please me with configuring the static route manually ? I have tried 
it but it is not reflecting in static_route table!

For any clarification please do revert.

Kaushik Bora

Consultant - Networks & Cloud

A-98, LGF, C.R.Park, New Delhi - 110019
O +91 11 4055 1411 | M +91 97111 00076
www.indiqus.com





This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and/or 
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete the original 
message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is 
strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been obtained for such 
action. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the 
sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep e-mail and attachments 
for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are virus-free and accepts no 
liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses.


On 12 December 2015 at 12:11:07 AM, Audrey Roberto B Baldin 
(audrey.bal...@unitelco.com.br) wrote:

I had already open an issue in JIRA (CLOUDSTACK-9089) for this problem, but I'm 
using version 4.5.2.

When we configure the static route using either the UI or cloudmonkey, 
everything seems right, but the route is not activated in VR.

I needed to access the VR console and configure the static route manually.


Atte.,
Audrey

- Mensagem original -
De: "Nux!" 
Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 11 de Dezembro de 2015 14:06:35
Assunto: Re: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1

Hello,

Then please feel free to raise this on dev@ and open an issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Kaushik Bora" 
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 15:58:53
> Subject: Re: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1

> Thanks...However, the issue is consistent, tried multiple times.
>
> Rgds
> Kaushik.
>
>
>
> Sent using CloudMagic Email
> [https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=pa&cv=7.4.10&pv=5.1&source=email_footer_2]
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:09 pm, Nux! < n...@li.nux.ro [n...@li.nux.ro] >
> wrote:
> Kaushik,
>
> Does this repeat consistently, i.e. if you re-create the router?
> If yes, please open an issue in jira and drop a message to the dev@ list as
> it
> may well be a bug.
>
> Lucian
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Kaushik Bora" 
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 14:13:30
> > Subject: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1
>
> > VPC private gateway static route is not created in VR.. However its
> > reflecting on UI. But there is no entry on static_route table...using ip
> > route show table static_route.
> >
> > Regards
> > Kaushik



Re: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1

2015-12-11 Thread Kaushik Bora
Hi Audrey,

  Could you please me with configuring the static route manually ? I have tried 
it but it is not reflecting in static_route table!

For any clarification please do revert.

Kaushik Bora

Consultant - Networks & Cloud  
  
A-98, LGF, C.R.Park, New Delhi - 110019  
O +91 11 4055 1411 | M +91 97111 00076  
www.indiqus.com  





This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and/or 
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete the original 
message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is 
strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been obtained for such 
action. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the 
sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep e-mail and attachments 
for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are virus-free and accepts no 
liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses.


On 12 December 2015 at 12:11:07 AM, Audrey Roberto B Baldin 
(audrey.bal...@unitelco.com.br) wrote:

I had already open an issue in JIRA (CLOUDSTACK-9089) for this problem, but I'm 
using version 4.5.2.  

When we configure the static route using either the UI or cloudmonkey, 
everything seems right, but the route is not activated in VR.  

I needed to access the VR console and configure the static route manually.  


Atte.,  
Audrey  

- Mensagem original -  
De: "Nux!"   
Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org  
Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 11 de Dezembro de 2015 14:06:35  
Assunto: Re: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1  

Hello,  

Then please feel free to raise this on dev@ and open an issue  
https://issues.apache.org/jira/  

--  
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!  

Nux!  
www.nux.ro  

- Original Message -  
> From: "Kaushik Bora"   
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org  
> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 15:58:53  
> Subject: Re: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1  

> Thanks...However, the issue is consistent, tried multiple times.  
>  
> Rgds  
> Kaushik.  
>  
>  
>  
> Sent using CloudMagic Email  
> [https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=pa&cv=7.4.10&pv=5.1&source=email_footer_2]
>   
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:09 pm, Nux! < n...@li.nux.ro [n...@li.nux.ro] >  
> wrote:  
> Kaushik,  
>  
> Does this repeat consistently, i.e. if you re-create the router?  
> If yes, please open an issue in jira and drop a message to the dev@ list as  
> it  
> may well be a bug.  
>  
> Lucian  
>  
> --  
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!  
>  
> Nux!  
> www.nux.ro  
>  
> - Original Message -  
> > From: "Kaushik Bora"   
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org  
> > Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 14:13:30  
> > Subject: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1  
>  
> > VPC private gateway static route is not created in VR.. However its  
> > reflecting on UI. But there is no entry on static_route table...using ip  
> > route show table static_route.  
> >  
> > Regards  
> > Kaushik  


Re: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1

2015-12-11 Thread Audrey Roberto B Baldin
I had already open an issue in JIRA (CLOUDSTACK-9089) for this problem, but I'm 
using version 4.5.2.

When we configure the static route using either the UI or cloudmonkey, 
everything seems right, but the route is not activated in VR.

I needed to access the VR console and configure the static route manually.


Atte.,
Audrey

- Mensagem original -
De: "Nux!" 
Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 11 de Dezembro de 2015 14:06:35
Assunto: Re: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1

Hello,

Then please feel free to raise this on dev@ and open an issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Kaushik Bora" 
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 15:58:53
> Subject: Re: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1

> Thanks...However, the issue is consistent, tried multiple times.
> 
> Rgds
> Kaushik.
> 
> 
> 
> Sent using CloudMagic Email
> [https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=pa&cv=7.4.10&pv=5.1&source=email_footer_2]
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:09 pm, Nux! < n...@li.nux.ro [n...@li.nux.ro] >
> wrote:
> Kaushik,
> 
> Does this repeat consistently, i.e. if you re-create the router?
> If yes, please open an issue in jira and drop a message to the dev@ list as
> it
> may well be a bug.
> 
> Lucian
> 
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> 
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> 
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Kaushik Bora" 
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 14:13:30
> > Subject: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1
> 
> > VPC private gateway static route is not created in VR.. However its
> > reflecting on UI. But there is no entry on static_route table...using ip
> > route show table static_route.
> >
> > Regards
>  > Kaushik


Re: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue

2015-12-11 Thread Cristian Ciobanu
Please see the screenshots from following URL: http://imgur.com/a/Fbbyi

Thank you.


Regards,
Cristian

 
On 12/11/2015 5:38:30 PM, Nux!  wrote:
Cristian,

The mailing list seems to be stripping attachments, you might want to upload 
the pictures somewhere on the web and share the link.

I tried adding a bogus new subnet to my existing 4.6 testbed and it worked 
without problems, I could give instances IP from it.

You might want to go through the management logs (don't forget to enable DEBUG) 
while you are trying to use the new IPs on the instance.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Cristian Ciobanu"
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 13:40:26
> Subject: Re: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue

> First of all, thanks for the answer.
>
> This is how i did, was work before on CloudStack 4.5 I'm not sure if this is a
> 4.6 issue or i did something wrong.
>
> Please see the attached screenshots.
>
> If you see on VR.jpg the class starting with 149. works great but 158. not. 
> also
> the if you see the screenshot for VM TST2, everything is fine, but  for VM 
> TST3
> not, no IP was allocated on VM.
>
> Thank you!
>
>
> Regards,
> Cristian
>
> 
> On 12/11/2015 3:07:34 PM, Nux! wrote:
> Cristian,
>
> In a Basic Network you only have one public interface on the VR, as well as
> 169.254 on eth1 - that's a link-local address used to communicate with the HV.
> -
> To add a new subnet to your network you must go to Home - Infrastructure - 
> Zones
> - Your Zone - Physical Network - Your Public Network - Guest - Network - click
> existing network - View IP Ranges - Add IP Range ... (it's actually simpler
> from the API/cloudmonkey).
>
> Once you have added it your VR should start using it at some point, especially
> if you have exhausted your current subnet.
> You can check what IP it passed out to instances in /etc/dhcphosts.txt
>
> HTH
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Cristian Ciobanu"
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 12:17:23
>> Subject: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>    I try to find the issue regarding additional IP class.
>>
>>    I have a CloudStack 4.6 on CentOS 6.7 ( 1x MGMT server and one KVM host 
>>with
>>    basic network )
>>
>>    Everything works fine till i try to add a additional guest IP class the
>>     additional is not working also i don't see any changes on VR and I have 
>>only 1
>>    NIC with GUEST traffic on the VR, does not matter if i add 1,2,3 etc.. 
>>guest IP
>>    class i don't see any updates on my VR also if i create a new VM the IP 
>>looks
>>    like is allocated in CloudStack web interface but no IP allocated on the 
>>VM
>>    side.
>>
>>    Can i get some help regarding this ?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
> > Cristian


Unable to add hosts

2015-12-11 Thread sayed jahed hussini
I installed cloudstack using this guide:
Quick Installation Guide for CentOS 6 — Apache CloudStack Installation 
Documentation 4.6.0 documentation
Everything went without any errors. But I am unable to add hosts. In 
/var/log/cloudstack/agent/agent.log I got the following error:
INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (main:null) Connecting to 10.1.1.2:8250ERROR 
[utils.nio.NioConnection] (main:null) Unable to initalize the 
threads.java.io.IOException: Connection closed with -1 on reading size..
Also in /var/log/cloudstack/management/setupManagement.log i got the following 
errors:
DEBUG:root:execute:iptables-save|grep INPUT| grep -w 8080DEBUG:root:Failed to 
execute:
DEBUG:root:execute:iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8080 -j 
ACCEPTDEBUG:root:execute:iptables-save|grep INPUT| grep -w 8250
DEBUG:root:Failed to execute:DEBUG:root:execute:iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m tcp 
--dport 8250 -j ACCEPT

best,Jay

|   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
| Quick Installation Guide for CentOS 6 — Apache CloudStack Installation 
Documentation 4.6.0 documenta...NFS Our configuration is going to use NFS for 
both primary and secondary storage. We are going to go ahead and setup two NFS 
shares for those purposes. We’llstart out by installing nfs-utils.  |
|  |
| View on cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org | Preview by Yahoo |
|  |
|   |




Re: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1

2015-12-11 Thread Nux!
Hello,

Then please feel free to raise this on dev@ and open an issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Kaushik Bora" 
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 15:58:53
> Subject: Re: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1

> Thanks...However, the issue is consistent, tried multiple times.
> 
> Rgds
> Kaushik.
> 
> 
> 
> Sent using CloudMagic Email
> [https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=pa&cv=7.4.10&pv=5.1&source=email_footer_2]
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:09 pm, Nux! < n...@li.nux.ro [n...@li.nux.ro] >
> wrote:
> Kaushik,
> 
> Does this repeat consistently, i.e. if you re-create the router?
> If yes, please open an issue in jira and drop a message to the dev@ list as
> it
> may well be a bug.
> 
> Lucian
> 
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> 
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> 
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Kaushik Bora" 
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 14:13:30
> > Subject: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1
> 
> > VPC private gateway static route is not created in VR.. However its
> > reflecting on UI. But there is no entry on static_route table...using ip
> > route show table static_route.
> >
> > Regards
>  > Kaushik


Re: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1

2015-12-11 Thread Kaushik Bora

Thanks...However, the issue is consistent, tried multiple times.

Rgds
Kaushik.



Sent using CloudMagic Email
[https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=pa&cv=7.4.10&pv=5.1&source=email_footer_2] 
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:09 pm, Nux! < n...@li.nux.ro [n...@li.nux.ro] > 
wrote:

Kaushik,

Does this repeat consistently, i.e. if you re-create the router?
If yes, please open an issue in jira and drop a message to the dev@ list as 
it

may well be a bug.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Kaushik Bora" 
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 14:13:30
> Subject: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1

> VPC private gateway static route is not created in VR.. However its
> reflecting on UI. But there is no entry on static_route table...using ip
> route show table static_route.
>
> Regards
> Kaushik

Re: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1

2015-12-11 Thread Nux!
Kaushik,

Does this repeat consistently, i.e. if you re-create the router?
If yes, please open an issue in jira and drop a message to the dev@ list as it 
may well be a bug.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Kaushik Bora" 
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 14:13:30
> Subject: VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1

> VPC private gateway static route is not created in VR.. However its
> reflecting on UI. But there is no entry on static_route table...using ip
> route show table static_route.
> 
> Regards
> Kaushik


Re: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue

2015-12-11 Thread Nux!
Cristian,

The mailing list seems to be stripping attachments, you might want to upload 
the pictures somewhere on the web and share the link.

I tried adding a bogus new subnet to my existing 4.6 testbed and it worked 
without problems, I could give instances IP from it.

You might want to go through the management logs (don't forget to enable DEBUG) 
while you are trying to use the new IPs on the instance.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Cristian Ciobanu" 
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 13:40:26
> Subject: Re: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue

> First of all, thanks for the answer.
> 
> This is how i did, was work before on CloudStack 4.5 I'm not sure if this is a
> 4.6 issue or i did something wrong.
> 
> Please see the attached screenshots.
> 
> If you see on VR.jpg the class starting with 149. works great but 158. not. 
> also
> the if you see the screenshot for VM TST2, everything is fine, but  for VM 
> TST3
> not, no IP was allocated on VM.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Cristian
> 
> 
> On 12/11/2015 3:07:34 PM, Nux!  wrote:
> Cristian,
> 
> In a Basic Network you only have one public interface on the VR, as well as
> 169.254 on eth1 - that's a link-local address used to communicate with the HV.
> -
> To add a new subnet to your network you must go to Home - Infrastructure - 
> Zones
> - Your Zone - Physical Network - Your Public Network - Guest - Network - click
> existing network - View IP Ranges - Add IP Range ... (it's actually simpler
> from the API/cloudmonkey).
> 
> Once you have added it your VR should start using it at some point, especially
> if you have exhausted your current subnet.
> You can check what IP it passed out to instances in /etc/dhcphosts.txt
> 
> HTH
> 
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> 
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> 
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Cristian Ciobanu"
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 12:17:23
>> Subject: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>>    I try to find the issue regarding additional IP class.
>>
>>    I have a CloudStack 4.6 on CentOS 6.7 ( 1x MGMT server and one KVM host 
>>with
>>    basic network )
>>
>>    Everything works fine till i try to add a additional guest IP class the
>>     additional is not working also i don't see any changes on VR and I have 
>>only 1
>>    NIC with GUEST traffic on the VR, does not matter if i add 1,2,3 etc.. 
>>guest IP
>>    class i don't see any updates on my VR also if i create a new VM the IP 
>>looks
>>    like is allocated in CloudStack web interface but no IP allocated on the 
>>VM
>>    side.
>>
>>    Can i get some help regarding this ?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
> > Cristian


Re: Update Templates O.S. CloudStack

2015-12-11 Thread Nux!
Hello,

You can deploy from current templates, apply updates then shut down and convert 
the root volume to a template and use that. Not the most elegant.
A better way to do it would be to set the templates to update on first boot 
(can be done via cloud-init or cloudbase-init) or just employ User Data to 
trigger system updates on a per instance basis.

HTH

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Yesid Mora" 
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 15:27:50
> Subject: Update Templates O.S. CloudStack

> Hello guys, we need a problem with the update templates because is necessary
> register a new template after applying security patches to operating systems,
> exist or know other process for update the template that is in the platform? 
> Or
> other mode for update templates (Windows,Linux)
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> 
> Cordialmente / Best regards,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yesid Mora | Orchestration Engineer | O4IT
> 
> 
> PBX:+57 (1) 423-5460  Ext  251  | Cel: 3124509565
> 
> 
> Cr. 7 #74-56 | Oficina 202 | Bogotá, Colombia
> 
> 
> www.o4it.com | ym...@o4it.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [http://www.o4it.com][http://www.linkedin.com/company/1207504][https://twitter.com/o4it][https://www.facebook.com/o4itofficial][https://www.youtube.com/user/o4itofficial]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or
> proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, immediately
> contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
> message.


Update Templates O.S. CloudStack

2015-12-11 Thread Yesid Mora
Hello guys, we need a problem with the update templates because is necessary 
register a new template after applying security patches to operating systems, 
exist or know other process for update the template that is in the platform? Or 
other mode for update templates (Windows,Linux)

Thanks



Cordialmente / Best regards,





Yesid Mora | Orchestration Engineer | O4IT


PBX:+57 (1) 423-5460  Ext  251  | Cel: 3124509565


Cr. 7 #74-56 | Oficina 202 | Bogotá, Colombia


www.o4it.com | ym...@o4it.com





[http://www.o4it.com][http://www.linkedin.com/company/1207504][https://twitter.com/o4it][https://www.facebook.com/o4itofficial][https://www.youtube.com/user/o4itofficial]




CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or 
proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, immediately 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.









VPC Issue - ACS-4.6.0-1

2015-12-11 Thread Kaushik Bora
VPC private gateway static route is not created in VR.. However its
reflecting on UI. But there is no entry on static_route table...using ip
route show table static_route.

Regards
Kaushik


Re: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue

2015-12-11 Thread Cristian Ciobanu
First of all, thanks for the answer.

This is how i did, was work before on CloudStack 4.5 I'm not sure if this is a 
4.6 issue or i did something wrong.

Please see the attached screenshots.

If you see on VR.jpg the class starting with 149. works great but 158. not. 
also the if you see the screenshot for VM TST2, everything is fine, but  for VM 
TST3 not, no IP was allocated on VM.

Thank you!


Regards,
Cristian

 
On 12/11/2015 3:07:34 PM, Nux!  wrote:
Cristian,

In a Basic Network you only have one public interface on the VR, as well as 
169.254 on eth1 - that's a link-local address used to communicate with the HV.
-
To add a new subnet to your network you must go to Home - Infrastructure - 
Zones - Your Zone - Physical Network - Your Public Network - Guest - Network - 
click existing network - View IP Ranges - Add IP Range ... (it's actually 
simpler from the API/cloudmonkey).

Once you have added it your VR should start using it at some point, especially 
if you have exhausted your current subnet.
You can check what IP it passed out to instances in /etc/dhcphosts.txt

HTH

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Cristian Ciobanu"
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 12:17:23
> Subject: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue

> Hello,
>
>    I try to find the issue regarding additional IP class.
>
>    I have a CloudStack 4.6 on CentOS 6.7 ( 1x MGMT server and one KVM host 
>with
>    basic network )
>
>    Everything works fine till i try to add a additional guest IP class the
>     additional is not working also i don't see any changes on VR and I have 
>only 1
>    NIC with GUEST traffic on the VR, does not matter if i add 1,2,3 etc.. 
>guest IP
>    class i don't see any updates on my VR also if i create a new VM the IP 
>looks
>    like is allocated in CloudStack web interface but no IP allocated on the VM
>    side.
>
>    Can i get some help regarding this ?
>
>
> Regards,
> Cristian


Re: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue

2015-12-11 Thread Nux!
Cristian,

In a Basic Network you only have one public interface on the VR, as well as 
169.254 on eth1 - that's a link-local address used to communicate with the HV.
-
To add a new subnet to your network you must go to Home - Infrastructure - 
Zones - Your Zone - Physical Network - Your Public Network - Guest - Network - 
click existing network - View IP Ranges - Add IP Range ... (it's actually 
simpler from the API/cloudmonkey).

Once you have added it your VR should start using it at some point, especially 
if you have exhausted your current subnet.
You can check what IP it passed out to instances in /etc/dhcphosts.txt

HTH

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Cristian Ciobanu" 
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 12:17:23
> Subject: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue

> Hello,
> 
>    I try to find the issue regarding additional IP class.
> 
>    I have a CloudStack 4.6 on CentOS 6.7 ( 1x MGMT server and one KVM host 
>with
>    basic network )
> 
>    Everything works fine till i try to add a additional guest IP class the
>     additional is not working also i don't see any changes on VR and I have 
>only 1
>    NIC with GUEST traffic on the VR, does not matter if i add 1,2,3 etc.. 
>guest IP
>    class i don't see any updates on my VR also if i create a new VM the IP 
>looks
>    like is allocated in CloudStack web interface but no IP allocated on the VM
>    side.
> 
>    Can i get some help regarding this ?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Cristian


Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue

2015-12-11 Thread Cristian Ciobanu
Hello,

    I try to find the issue regarding additional IP class.

    I have a CloudStack 4.6 on CentOS 6.7 ( 1x MGMT server and one KVM host 
with basic network )

    Everything works fine till i try to add a additional guest IP class the 
additional is not working also i don't see any changes on VR and I have only 1 
NIC with GUEST traffic on the VR, does not matter if i add 1,2,3 etc.. guest IP 
class i don't see any updates on my VR also if i create a new VM the IP looks 
like is allocated in CloudStack web interface but no IP allocated on the VM 
side.

    Can i get some help regarding this ? 


Regards,
Cristian

 

RE: cloudstack UI through accelerator/cache/proxy

2015-12-11 Thread Giles Sirett
Guys

Thanks for your opinions - really useful
We're going to put this through the lab at some point soon - will share results 
when we have

Kind Regards
Giles


[ShapeBlue]
Giles Sirett
CEO ,   ShapeBlue


d:  +44 203 603 0540 | s: +44  20 3603 
0541 | 
 m:  +44 7961112055

e:  giles.sir...@shapeblue.com | t: 
 |  w:  
www.shapeblue.com

a:  53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden London WC2N 4HS UK


[cid:image7ac8e3.png@fa345783.4aa2e35d]


Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services 
India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in 
Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd 
is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under 
license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error.




-Original Message-
From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com]
Sent: 11 December 2015 01:34
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: cloudstack UI through accelerator/cache/proxy

I too use NetScaler and I actually found compression to have more of an impact 
than caching. Caching probably didn't help as much due to the jQuery stuff.
On Dec 10, 2015 8:30 PM, "Nux!"  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've been running something like this without issues using mr
> Kinsella's instructions for a good while now.
> http://theresnomon.co/2014/improving-cloudstack-ui-performance/
>
> I've seen visible improvements in performance, at least with the
> version we have in production (4.4).
>
> HTH
> Lucian
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Giles Sirett" 
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Thursday, 10 December, 2015 11:06:01
> > Subject: cloudstack UI through accelerator/cache/proxy
>
> > I’m trying to get a basic understanding on how much the performance
> > of
> the ACS
> > UI would improve if it was run through some form of
> > accelerator/reverse proxy/cache (i.e. something like a netscaler)
> >
> > Scenario is a management server that is a long way (physically)
> > from
> the users,
> > therefore latency is causing UI delays. Idea would be to put an
> accelerator
> > close to the users so it can cache the static pieces of the ACS UI
> >
> > We will be doing some testing on this, but wanted to know from the
> outset if
> > anybody has a gut feel for how well the ACS UI may behave when run
> through a
> > setup like this
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind Regards
> > Giles
> >
> > Giles Sirett
> > CEO
> >
> > [cid:image003.png@01D104EF.CE276C40]
> >
> > D: +44 20 3603 0541 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 796 111 2055
> >
> > giles.sir...@shapeblue.com |
> > www.shapeblue.com |
> > Twitter:@shapeBlue
> >
> >
> > Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
> services
> >
> > IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> > CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment
> > framework
> > CloudStack Consulting
> > CloudStack Software
> > Engineering
> > CloudStack Infrastructure
> > Support
> > CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> >
> > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended solely
> > for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions
> > expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those
> > of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended
> recipient
> > of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its
> > contents,
> nor
> > copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe
> > you
> have
> > received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company
> > incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> > company incorporated
> in
> > India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue
> Brasil
> > Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Bra

Re: VR assigned incorrect static NAT IP

2015-12-11 Thread Nux!
Matthew, 

If you can consistently replicate this problem (ie it survives VR destroy), 
then you should open an issue[1] and let dev@ know so it gets some attention.

Lucian 

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Matthew M. Gamble" 
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 9 December, 2015 17:00:35
> Subject: VR assigned incorrect static NAT IP

> I’m running into an odd issues with a virtual router for an isolated guest
> network on a new 4.6 installation.
> 
> The router is created successfully, however, when we assign a new static NAT 
> IP
> the IP isn’t being added to the VR – the source NAT IP is used instead.  Right
> now I have a VR that has the source nat IP assigned to eth2, eth3, and eth4,
> and the static nat IP isn’t assigned to any interfaces.  As a result, none of
> the static nat mappings / rules are working.
> 
> I’m fairly new to debugging virtual router issues – what logs should I be
> collecting to start figuring out why the system isn’t assigning the correct IP
> to the interface in the VR?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Matt


Re: AW: AW: Run Windows on top of KVM+virtio? Watch out for Windows updates, system unbootable!

2015-12-11 Thread Nux!
No idea, sorry. I have destroyed the test VMs.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Jochim, Ingo" 
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: "dev" 
> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 07:57:13
> Subject: AW: AW: Run Windows on top of KVM+virtio? Watch out for Windows 
> updates, system unbootable!

> Nux,
> 
> I worked with the SUSE VMDP drivers (downloaded from SUSE) on Xen quite a lot 
> in
> the past.
> Upgrading the drivers was always a nightmare and we ran into bluescreens very
> often.
> Since version 2 they also come with Virtio.
> 
> I don't know if those are the same drivers which come with Windows.
> Any idea?
> 
> Regards,
> Ingo
> 
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Dezember 2015 02:27
> An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: dev
> Betreff: Re: AW: Run Windows on top of KVM+virtio? Watch out for Windows
> updates, system unbootable!
> 
> Ingo,
> 
> Yes, I use the same. But the drivers "SUSE Storage/Net" in Windows Optional
> updates override them.
> Verified on 2008r2 and 2012r2.
> Luckily the damage is limited as they are in the Optional channel, not sure 
> how
> many people chose to install those alongside the Important ones, but hopefully
> it won't be that many.
> 
> I also got fscked by an update Microsoft pushed for some Intel fake-raid the
> other day.
> You'd think a humongous, multi-billion dollar company has some resources to do
> QA, especially on their "Enterprise" products.
> 
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> 
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> 
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Jochim, Ingo" 
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org, "dev" 
>> Sent: Thursday, 10 December, 2015 11:58:03
>> Subject: AW: Run Windows on top of KVM+virtio? Watch out for Windows updates,
>> system unbootable!
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> you can use the virtio drivers from the Fedora Project.
>> I didn't have problems on W2k12 and W2k12R2.
>> 
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Windows_Virtio_Drivers
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Ingo
>> 
>> 
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2015 10:42
>> An: dev
>> Cc: Cloudstack Users List
>> Betreff: Run Windows on top of KVM+virtio? Watch out for Windows
>> updates, system unbootable!
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Just a quick heads-up!
>> Someone on the CentOS ML reported his Windows 2008r2 VM on top of
>> KVM+VirtIO PV ended up unbootable after he installed the SUSE Network
>> and Storage drivers from the Optional Updates channel.
>> I've just checked now and it's the case, the system blue screens after 
>> reboot.
>> Will test 2012r2 shortly.
>> 
>> 
>> It'd be best if you don't install those updates/drivers for now, looks
>> like someone in Redmond didn't do his homework.
>> 
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>> 
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>> 
>> --
>> This email was Virus checked by UTM 9. http://www.sophos.com
>> 
>> --
> > This email was Virus checked by UTM 9. http://www.sophos.com