RE: Can´t take snapshot - CS 4.5.1
You might want to try this works for us fine. http://www.nux.ro/archive/2014/01/Taking_KVM_volume_snapshots_with_Cloudstack_4_2_on_CentOS_6_5.html -Original Message- From: ilya [mailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 4:39 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Can´t take snapshot - CS 4.5.1 qemu 1.2 is at least 3 years old and does not support -s, perhaps you can try installing much newer version from EPEL or elsewhere. You can try running Qemu 1.7 and it should work. There are many other reasons why you want to run latest stable Qemu of 1.x family - including bug/security fixes and performance improvements. If you want to stay on vendor supported OS, you can also try running CentOS7 or EL7. This can also be classified as bug as we dont satisfy much older qemu/kvm versions. We probably need to check qemu-img for -s parameter, and if it does not exists - execute without -s, or a more meaningful error. Perhaps you can help to file a bug on https://issues.apache.org/jira under CloudStack project. On 7/22/15 12:02 PM, Luciano Castro wrote: unknown optioo
RE: ACS 4.3 scheduled volume snapshot don't work
Hello, Thanks to Nux for this link, it works with us CS 4.3.1, Centos 6.6 KVM. http://www.nux.ro/archive/2014/01/Taking_KVM_volume_snapshots_with_Cloudstack_4_2_on_CentOS_6_5.html -Original Message- From: Andrei Mikhailovsky [mailto:and...@arhont.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 8:11 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: ACS 4.3 scheduled volume snapshot don't work Hi Ugo, This feature is working and I have been using it since version 4.2.x I think. I am currently on 4.5.1 and this feature still works. I suggest you inspect the management server logs to see what errors you get. Schedule a snapshot and monitor the management server logs. You should have a clue from the logs where your issue is. Andrei - Original Message - From: Ugo Vasi ugo.v...@procne.it To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 23 June, 2015 3:26:46 PM Subject: ACS 4.3 scheduled volume snapshot don't work Hi all, I've installed a ACS 4.3 on Ubuntu and KVM as hypervisor agent, NFS primary and secondary storage. The management interface don't permit to schedule periodic volume snapshot. Googoling, I find that is it possible to enable this feature on KVM hypervisor by changing kvm.snapshot.enable in the Global settings. I did that and now I can see news icon on volume detail of instances that allow to setup recurring snapshot. I scheduled a snapshot test but do not see it in any list. Is this feature working? Where can I see if there is a problem? thanks! -- U g o V a s i ugo.v...@procne.it P r o c n e s.r.l ) via Cotonificio 45 33010 Tavagnacco IT phone: +390432486523 fax: +390432486523 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e confidenziali ed è vietata la diffusione in qualunque modo eseguita. Qualora Lei non fosse la persona a cui il presente messaggio è destinato, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo e a non leggerlo, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Per qualsiasi informazione si prega di contattare supp...@procne.it . Rif. D.L. 196/2003
RE: Cloudstack 4.3.2 with KVM system template from shapeblue not supported by qemu version
Thanks Rohit Andrija, I hereby confirm that the command sent by Andrija worked fine and the template spinned on Centos 6.6, after running the following command from Ubuntu 14 qemu-img convert -f qcow2 systemvm64template-4.3-kvm.qcow2 -O qcow2 -o compat=0.10 systemvm64template-4.3-kvm.qcowold -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 10:45 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Cloudstack 4.3.2 with KVM system template from shapeblue not supported by qemu version I’ll fix our 4.3 systemvm template to be compatible with older versions. This has been fixed for 4.4 and 4.5. On 26-May-2015, at 10:30 am, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Just convert the template (use some newer ubuntu version of qemu-img) to qcow2 version 2... They provide qcow2 version 3, you need version 2 for centos something like (but please google and confirm): qemu-img convert -f qcow2 /var/lib/libvirt/images/qcow2v3.img -O qcow2 -o compat=0.10 /var/lib/libvirt/images/qcow2v2.img On 26 May 2015 at 05:09, Amin Samir amin.sa...@opencloud.net.au wrote: Hello, We are using Cloudstack 4.3.2 from shapeblue repo, along with KVM template dated 2015-01-28, our environment is as follows: 1) Cloud stack management server Centos 6.6, with Cloudstack 4.3.2 2) Centos 6.6 KVM with the cloudstack-agent installed from shapeblue repo 3) FreeNAS 9.3 for NFS primary secondary storage. 4) Advanced zone We have configured cloubr0 on eth0 in a single physical network, modified the labels during the zone launch to match the bridge names on the host. However System vm cannot launch due the following error in the agent: uses a qcow2 feature which is not supported by this qemu version: QCOW version 3 Anyone please help with this issue, shall we use another system template. Thanks in advance. -- Andrija Panić Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: Network performance issue
Hello, We had a similar issue that was resolved when we changed the FreeNAS default sharing behavior from sync to async by adding a new Sysctl with the following value, vfs.nfsd.async value to 1 -Original Message- From: Sam Ceylani [mailto:s...@mistercertified.com] Sent: Friday, April 03, 2015 1:19 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Network performance issue We use Freenas with ZFS also and it is notorious with NFS shares, we created a dataset and shared on NFS and disabled sync option for this dataset from ZFS, I forgot the command but it was something like zfs set sync=disabled /tank/dataset something like that, it will fix it. This has really nothing to do with cloudstack and xenserver which we use both... Thanks, Sam Ceylani, MBA Computer Engineer MisterCertified Inc. 301 W. Platt St. Suite 447, Tampa, FL 33606x-apple-data-detectors://0/0 P 813tel:813.264.6460.264.6460tel:813.264.6460 M 813tel:813.416.7867.416.7867tel:813.416.7867 F 800tel:800.553.9520.553.9520tel:800.553.9520 E sam.ceyl...@mistercertified.commailto:sam.ceyl...@mistercertified.com On Apr 2, 2015, at 1:13 PM, Pankaj Singh pank.sin9...@gmail.commailto:pank.sin9...@gmail.com wrote: Still no luck by disabling these flags. Would you please help us for this. Thanks Regards, PankaJ Singh On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Jeronimo Garcia garciaj...@gmail.commailto:garciaj...@gmail.com wrote: mm i had this problem before i think it was TCP offliading or RX/TX checksumming. I'd say play with ethtool and see if it makes any difference disabling this flags (or enabling them) Im on #cloudstack@freenode if you want to pop in. Thanks On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Pankaj Singh pank.sin9...@gmail.commailto:pank.sin9...@gmail.com wrote: We have two different network on two similar switches. One is our 192.168.1.0/24 and other is 192.168.2.0/24 network. Our switch capacity is 1000Mbps and so does our NIC cards on Host machines. On n/w 192.168.1.0/24, we are using xenserver 6.2 to deploy our Virtual machines and we can able to achieve persistent 75 to 80 MB/s speed while transferring (via scp) one 12GiB file from one VM to another VM on same Xenserver. We are using 192.168.2.0/24 network for our cloudstack setup. We have used following software with their version to establish out private cloud: Cloudstack = v4.4.2 Management Server On = Centos 6.4 x86_64 bit Xenserver as a hypervisor = v6.2 (similar configuration of machine as we have used in 192.168.1.0/24 n/w) FreeNAS as a Primary and Secondary Storage via NFS = v9.3 (filesystem is ZFS based) Virtual Machine OS = Centos 6.5 x86_64 bit We are using basic networking with its all default configurations but we are not able to achieve at least 60 to 65 MB/s of transferring speed. In cloud If we start scp from one machine to another machine then our transferring speed starts from 63 MB/s and then its keep falling till 20 to 25 MB/s. Would you please tell us that what we are missing here. Is ther any kind of global setting we need to configure so that at least we can achieve more than 50 MB/s transferring speed between two guest VM. Thanks and Regards PankaJ Singh
RE: Expand LV over 2TB CS 4.3.1 Xenserver 6.2
Hi Peter, We have one xen server with 6 TB local LVM that is recognized by CS 4.3.1, You will need to modify the storage.max.volume.size in global settings to be able to create volumes more than 1 TB, when add the host / hypervisor to CS it will show its local storage in primary storage, however you will have to create a compute disk offering that uses local disk storage. -Original Message- From: Erdősi Péter [mailto:f...@niif.hu] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 7:28 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Expand LV over 2TB CS 4.3.1 Xenserver 6.2 Hi there! I want to expand one of my LV-s to 22TB. I know about Xenserver limit, and it's does not work now but I had already succesfully expand LV-s over 10TB on native Xenserver 6.2 in command line, and it's works fine over a year. Actually I want to know, what will be happen, if I do it under CS's nodes. Is the CS management server recognize new storage size, or may need to upgrade the database too? Are there anyone, who faced with this problem, and have experience? Thanks, Peter
RE: VM Storage migration only works once not vice versa CS 4.3 Xen 6.2 SP1
Hi Sanjeev,
Thank you for response, yes the host from the new cluster can mount the primary
storage from the first cluster, I think this is the error
VM state transitted from :Stopped to Migrating with event:
StorageMigrationRequested
vm's original host id: 73 new host id: null host id before state transition:
null
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Neelarapu [mailto:sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, 25 August 2014 12:31 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: VM Storage migration only works once not vice versa CS 4.3 Xen
6.2 SP1
Hi Amin,
There are no error messages in the log snippet you have provided.
Is the host in the 2nd cluster from which you are trying vm storage migration
(2nd time after successful migration) able to mount the primary storage in the
cluster1? If not you may have to resolve that issue. Otherwise open a defect.
Thanks,
Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Amin Samir [mailto:a...@opencloud.net.au]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 7:21 AM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: VM Storage migration only works once not vice versa CS 4.3 Xen 6.2
SP1
Hello,
We have two clusters, the environment is as follows:
? CS Mgmt server 4.3 on CentOS 6.5
? Hypervisors Xen Server 6.2 SP1.
? One Zone, Two clusters with different two primary storage servers.
? Primary Secondary storage are NFS based.
When attempting to move a VM from one cluster to another, we succeed only the
first time, the VM and its files are moved to a new hypervisor and new storage
server in the new cluster, however when attempting to migrate the VM to the
original cluster, host, and original storage, the migration fails, so it is
only one time migration.
The logs are as follows, we would appreciate if someone has faced this issue
before, it is very helpful feature in cloud stack to migrate across clusters
and storage servers, but it seems it is not working, cause we simulated the
environment on CS 4.3 from scratch installation and the behaviour is the same.
/mnt/DATA/VM-SEC-01/volumes/2/1071 is not being created.
2014-08-21 11:37:40,671 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-21:ctx-da934e40 ctx-fb603895) submit async job-10947, details:
AsyncJobVO {id:10947, userId: 2, accountId:
2, instanceType: None, instanceId: null, cmd:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.vm.MigrateVMCmd, cmdInfo:
{response:json,sessionkey:w6C9EF9N9Xi0AhEXZ3Cdc9nQNkI\u003d,virtu
almachineid:ae028abb-4181-49fb-913f-bda34f77d792,cmdEventType:VM.MIGRATE,ctxUserId:2,storageid:098d4f7a-a040-3462-add1-d618d6ec53c1,httpmethod:GET,_:1408592259844,
ctxAccountId:2,ctxStartEventId:1088984}, cmdVersion: 0, status:
IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result: null, initMsid:
53350633438879, completeMsid: null, lastUpda
ted: null, lastPolled: null, created: null}
2014-08-21 11:37:40,671 INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor]
(Job-Executor-14:ctx-57b36727) Add job-10947 into job monitoring
2014-08-21 11:37:40,671 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:ctx-57b36727) Executing AsyncJobVO {id:10947, userId: 2,
accountId: 2, instanceType: None, instanceId: nu
ll, cmd: org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.vm.MigrateVMCmd, cmdInfo:
{response:json,sessionkey:w6C9EF9N9Xi0AhEXZ3Cdc9nQNkI\u003d,virtualmachineid:ae028abb-4181-49fb-913f
-bda34f77d792,cmdEventType:VM.MIGRATE,ctxUserId:2,storageid:098d4f7a-a040-3462-add1-d618d6ec53c1,httpmethod:GET,_:1408592259844,ctxAccountId:2,ctxStartEventId:
1088984}, cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode:
0, result: null, initMsid: 53350633438879, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated:
null, lastPolled: null, created:
null}
2014-08-21 11:37:40,672 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-21:ctx-da934e40
ctx-fb603895) ===END=== 103.4.132.4 -- GET
command=migrateVirtualMachinestorageid=098d4f7a-a040-3462-ad
d1-d618d6ec53c1virtualmachineid=ae028abb-4181-49fb-913f-bda34f77d792response=jsonsessionkey=w6C9EF9N9Xi0AhEXZ3Cdc9nQNkI%3D_=1408592259844
2014-08-21 11:37:40,738 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:ctx-57b36727 ctx-fb603895) VM state transitted from :Stopped
to Migrating with event: StorageMigrationRequested
vm's original host id: 73 new host id: null host id before state transition:
null
2014-08-21 11:37:40,943 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
(Job-Executor-14:ctx-57b36727 ctx-fb603895) copyAsync inspecting src type
VOLUME copyAsync inspecting dest type VOLUME
2014-08-21 11:37:40,946 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.c.a.StorageCacheRandomAllocator]
(Job-Executor-14:ctx-57b36727 ctx-fb603895) Can't find staging storage in zone:
1
2014-08-21 11:37:41,092 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (Job-Executor-14:ctx-57b36727
ctx-fb603895) Seq 73-1469252089: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 53350633438879, via:
73(XEN-08), Ver: v1, Flags: 1
00011
VM Storage migration only works once not vice versa CS 4.3 Xen 6.2 SP1
Hello,
We have two clusters, the environment is as follows:
? CS Mgmt server 4.3 on CentOS 6.5
? Hypervisors Xen Server 6.2 SP1.
? One Zone, Two clusters with different two primary storage servers.
? Primary Secondary storage are NFS based.
When attempting to move a VM from one cluster to another, we succeed only the
first time, the VM and its files are moved to a new hypervisor and new storage
server in the new cluster, however when attempting to migrate the VM to the
original cluster, host, and original storage, the migration fails, so it is
only one time migration.
The logs are as follows, we would appreciate if someone has faced this issue
before, it is very helpful feature in cloud stack to migrate across clusters
and storage servers, but it seems it is not working, cause we simulated the
environment on CS 4.3 from scratch installation and the behaviour is the same.
/mnt/DATA/VM-SEC-01/volumes/2/1071 is not being created.
2014-08-21 11:37:40,671 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-21:ctx-da934e40 ctx-fb603895) submit async job-10947, details:
AsyncJobVO {id:10947, userId: 2, accountId:
2, instanceType: None, instanceId: null, cmd:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.vm.MigrateVMCmd, cmdInfo:
{response:json,sessionkey:w6C9EF9N9Xi0AhEXZ3Cdc9nQNkI\u003d,virtu
almachineid:ae028abb-4181-49fb-913f-bda34f77d792,cmdEventType:VM.MIGRATE,ctxUserId:2,storageid:098d4f7a-a040-3462-add1-d618d6ec53c1,httpmethod:GET,_:1408592259844,
ctxAccountId:2,ctxStartEventId:1088984}, cmdVersion: 0, status:
IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result: null, initMsid:
53350633438879, completeMsid: null, lastUpda
ted: null, lastPolled: null, created: null}
2014-08-21 11:37:40,671 INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor]
(Job-Executor-14:ctx-57b36727) Add job-10947 into job monitoring
2014-08-21 11:37:40,671 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:ctx-57b36727) Executing AsyncJobVO {id:10947, userId: 2,
accountId: 2, instanceType: None, instanceId: nu
ll, cmd: org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.vm.MigrateVMCmd, cmdInfo:
{response:json,sessionkey:w6C9EF9N9Xi0AhEXZ3Cdc9nQNkI\u003d,virtualmachineid:ae028abb-4181-49fb-913f
-bda34f77d792,cmdEventType:VM.MIGRATE,ctxUserId:2,storageid:098d4f7a-a040-3462-add1-d618d6ec53c1,httpmethod:GET,_:1408592259844,ctxAccountId:2,ctxStartEventId:
1088984}, cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode:
0, result: null, initMsid: 53350633438879, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated:
null, lastPolled: null, created:
null}
2014-08-21 11:37:40,672 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-21:ctx-da934e40
ctx-fb603895) ===END=== 103.4.132.4 -- GET
command=migrateVirtualMachinestorageid=098d4f7a-a040-3462-ad
d1-d618d6ec53c1virtualmachineid=ae028abb-4181-49fb-913f-bda34f77d792response=jsonsessionkey=w6C9EF9N9Xi0AhEXZ3Cdc9nQNkI%3D_=1408592259844
2014-08-21 11:37:40,738 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:ctx-57b36727 ctx-fb603895) VM state transitted from :Stopped
to Migrating with event: StorageMigrationRequested
vm's original host id: 73 new host id: null host id before state transition:
null
2014-08-21 11:37:40,943 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
(Job-Executor-14:ctx-57b36727 ctx-fb603895) copyAsync inspecting src type
VOLUME copyAsync inspecting dest type VOLUME
2014-08-21 11:37:40,946 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.c.a.StorageCacheRandomAllocator]
(Job-Executor-14:ctx-57b36727 ctx-fb603895) Can't find staging storage in zone:
1
2014-08-21 11:37:41,092 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (Job-Executor-14:ctx-57b36727
ctx-fb603895) Seq 73-1469252089: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 53350633438879, via:
73(XEN-08), Ver: v1, Flags: 1
00011,
[{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand:{srcTO:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:86417b6e-3fda-476e-b4d1-3bc77a67be89,volumeType:ROOT
,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO:{uuid:1a07254a-c9d4-3ae0-8090-461e6597d818,id:221,poolType:NetworkFilesystem,host:10.8.1.40,path:/mn
t/DRIVE/DATA,port:2049,url:NetworkFilesystem://10.8.1.40//mnt/DRIVE/DATA/?ROLE=PrimarySTOREUUID=1a07254a-c9d4-3ae0-8090-461e6597d818}},name:ROOT-710,size:42949672960,path
:c0669da9-1f91-4bdf-85aa-1d90bd9dc966,volumeId:1071,vmName:i-2-710-VM,accountId:2,format:VHD,id:1071,deviceId:0,hypervisorType:XenServer}},destTO:{org.apache.clo
udstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:86417b6e-3fda-476e-b4d1-3bc77a67be89,volumeType:ROOT,dataStore:{com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO:{_url:nfs://10.8.1.30/mnt/DATA/VM-SEC
-01,_role:Image}},name:ROOT-710,size:42949672960,path:volumes/2/1071,volumeId:1071,vmName:i-2-710-VM,accountId:2,format:VHD,id:1071,deviceId:0,hypervisorT
ype:XenServer}},executeInSequence:false,options:{},wait:21600}}] }
2014-08-21 11:37:41,092 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (Job-Executor-14:ctx-57b36727
ctx-fb603895) Seq 73-1469252089: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId: 53350633438879,
via: 73(XEN-08),
RE: Snapshot partial file creates are not cleaned up.
Thanks Sangeetha for your prompt response. Kind Regards -Original Message- From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, 20 August 2014 1:10 AM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Snapshot partial file creates are not cleaned up. Hi, Following are couple of issues that have been logged to track this issue: CLOUDSTACK-5395 - When backup snapshot fails because of backup.snapshot.wait time exceeding , the vhd entries form the primary store is not getting cleared. This bug was reopened to address - cleaning up of snapshot that errors out from primary store and secondary store specific to KVM hypervisor. CLOUDSTACK-5446 - KVM-Secondary Store down-Even after secondary store is brought back up after being down for few hours,snapshot jobs do not get triggered with reason there is other active snapshot tasks on the instance to which the volume is attached Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Amin Samir [mailto:a...@opencloud.net.au] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 9:55 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Snapshot partial file creates are not cleaned up. Hello, When a volume snapshot creation times out ( based on the global setting), the partial file creates is not cleaned up. Has anyone faced this? Or filled a bug for this? Kind Regards
RE: unable to create VM in ACS 4.4 hypervisor XenServer
Hi Harikrishna,
Using the newest 4.4 template published on Jenkins 11th of August, console vm
pauses on creation, and site2site vpn does not establish, please find the
following log
(secstorage-1:ctx-e286a12e) Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm
java.lang.RuntimeException: Job failed due to exception Resource [Host:1] is
unreachable: Host 1: Unable to start instance due to Unable to acquire lock on
VMTemplateStoragePool: 1
2014-08-12 15:40:23,424 INFO [o.a.c.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
(secstorage-1:ctx-e286a12e) Unable to start secondary storage vm for standby
capacity, secStorageVm vm Id : 1, will
recycle it and start a new one
2014-08-12 15:40:23,516 WARN [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2]
(secstorage-1:ctx-a2a2ee4c) Was unable to find lock for the key vm_instance1
and thread id 1337390742
Unable to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id :
1, will recycle it and start a new one
2014-08-12 16:19:54,294 WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
(catalina-exec-12:ctx-db2ae77e ctx-c67a1655) Received unknown parameters for
command listNetworks. Unknown parameters
: details
2014-08-12 16:20:16,077 ERROR [c.c.u.s.SshHelper] (DirectAgent-62:ctx-2c9a8866)
SSH execution of command /opt/cloud/bin/router_proxy.sh ipsectunnel.sh
169.254.1.216 -A -l 192.168.1.52 -n
172.16.0.0/16 -g 192.168.1.1 -r 10.2.2.85 -N 10.10.10.0/24 -e aes128-sha1 -i
aes128-sha1;modp1024 -t 86400 -T 3600 -s aminsamir -d 1 has an error status
code in return. result
output: inet 192.168.1.52/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth1
2014-08-12 16:20:16,248 WARN [o.a.c.a.c.u.v.CreateVpnConnectionCmd]
(API-Job-Executor-20:ctx-79acdf9f job-103 ctx-ac82ecba) Exception:
com.cloud.exception.ResourceUnavailableException: Resource
[Site2SiteVpnConnection:1] is unreachable: Failed to apply site-to-site VPN
2014-08-12 16:20:16,250 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-20:ctx-79acdf9f job-103) Complete async job-103, jobStatus:
FAILED, resultCode: 530, result:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.response.ExceptionResponse/null/{uuidList:[],errorcode:534,errortext:Resource
[Site2SiteVpnConnection:1] is unreachable: Failed to apply site-to-site
VPN}
Kind Regards
-Original Message-
From: Harikrishna Patnala [mailto:harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 12 August 2014 12:59 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: unable to create VM in ACS 4.4 hypervisor XenServer
Hi,
You are trying to deploy a FreeBSD 10 instance right !
Try following the steps mentioned in the blog
http://shankerbalan.net/blog/freebsd-10-on-cloudstack-xenserver/
I think you are using the
FreeBSD-10.0-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.isohttp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-amd64/10.0/FreeBSD-10.0-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso
to deploy VM.
Please give a try using
FreeBSD-10.0-RELEASE-amd64-bootonly.isohttp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-amd64/10.0/FreeBSD-10.0-RELEASE-amd64-bootonly.iso
Thanks
Harikrishna
On 11-Aug-2014, at 8:28 pm, motty cruz
motty.c...@gmail.commailto:motty.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Erik,
the attached file is my log,
virtual router started, I can ping anywhere from virtual router; System VMs are
up as well, except I can't build any instances.
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Erik Weber
terbol...@gmail.commailto:terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, paste your log :-)
Erik
9. aug. 2014 00:25 skrev motty cruz
motty.c...@gmail.commailto:motty.c...@gmail.com følgende:
Hello All,
I am having the issue Job failed due to exception Unable to create a
deployment for VM[User]i-2-18-VM] it was able to create router but not VM.
Systems VMs are up,
any suggestions?
Thanks,
i-2-23-vm.txt
RE: CloudStack 4.2.1 - XenServer 6.2 FreeBSD 10
Hello, Follow this link http://shankerbalan.net/blog/freebsd-10-on-cloudstack-xenserver/ Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 24 July 2014 6:55 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CloudStack 4.2.1 - XenServer 6.2 FreeBSD 10 Hi, I am trying to install FreeBSD 10 64bit iso on XenServer 6.2 using Cloudstack 4.2.1, I get an error message Unable to create a deployment for VM any idea?
Cloud Stack 1TB volumes limitation
Hello, Has anyone know a workaround for the 1TB limitations in volumes? Kind Regards Amin
RE: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!!
Hi Devdeep, Thank for you support, have you tried moving an instance that is created from custom offering? is it not allowing you also? Kind Regards Amin -Original message- To:users@cloudstack.apache.org; From:Devdeep Singh devdeep.si...@citrix.com Sent:Wed 28-05-2014 16:23 Subject:RE: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!! Hi Amin, Right now I am not sure as to why the issue is there. If I get a chance, I'll give it a try and let you know if I find something. Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From: Amin Samir [mailto:a...@opencloud.net.au] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 2:36 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!! Sorry forgot to mention this cloud stack is migrated twice before from 2.2.14 to 4.2.1 then 4.3 if this helps Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Amin Samir Sent: Tuesday, 27 May 2014 5:04 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!! Hi Devdeep, Thanks for replying, it is one cluster with 7 hosts, we still have room to migrate this host, in fact other machines created from pre-defined offerings do migrate fine. All hosts are running the same version Xen Server 6.2 SP1, There is no logs the when you click the migrate to host icon it does not pop up, while another vm created from pre-defined offer and from the same browser show the pop up when migrate to host is clicked. Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, 27 May 2014 4:58 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!! How many hosts do you have in your setup and how are they distributed across clusters? Are all hosts running the same version of the xenserver hypervisor? Do you see the issue only with custom offering; or is it seen if an instance has been created with any other offering? Anything in the cloudstack logs when you try and list the hosts for migration from the UI? Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From: Amin Samir [mailto:a...@opencloud.net.au] Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 8:12 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!! Hello, We have cloud stack 4.3 over centos our hypervisors are xen server 6.2 SP1 with latest updates, the VM's that are created from custom offering don't let us use the migrate host icon from the UI, however you can move them from the xen center console. Has anyone faced this issue before? Kind Regards
RE: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!!
Hi Prashant, Will re-check the error log again, otherwise will open a ticket. will keep you posted on the progress thanks for the help. Kind Regards Amin -Original message- To:users@cloudstack.apache.org; From:Prashant Kumar Mishra prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com Sent:Tue 27-05-2014 17:15 Subject:RE: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!! If you are seeing error message like below I mentioned please open a ticket ,If not can you please some relevant logs . Log 2014-02-03 10:07:25,234 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (catalina-exec-16:ctx-fca502c2 ctx-cb0c10a8) FirstFitAllocator has 1 hosts to check for allocation: [Host[-4-Routing]] 2014-02-03 10:07:25,237 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (catalina-exec-16:ctx-fca502c2 ctx-cb0c10a8) Found 1 hosts for allocation after prioritization: [Host[-4-Routing]] 2014-02-03 10:07:25,238 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-16:ctx-fca502c2 ctx-cb0c10a8) unhandled exception executing api command: findHostsForMigration java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.agent.manager.allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator.allocateTo(FirstFitAllocator.java:267) at com.cloud.agent.manager.allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator.allocateTo(FirstFitAllocator.java:238) at com.cloud.server.ManagementServerImpl.listHostsForMigrationOfVM(ManagementServerImpl.java:1195) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) at org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:317) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150) at org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:91) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172) at org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204) at $Proxy210.listHostsForMigrationOfVM(Unknown Source) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.host.FindHostsForMigrationCmd.execute(FindHostsForMigrationCmd.java:75) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:161) -Original Message- From: Amin Samir [mailto:a...@opencloud.net.au] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 2:36 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!! Sorry forgot to mention this cloud stack is migrated twice before from 2.2.14 to 4.2.1 then 4.3 if this helps Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Amin Samir Sent: Tuesday, 27 May 2014 5:04 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!! Hi Devdeep, Thanks for replying, it is one cluster with 7 hosts, we still have room to migrate this host, in fact other machines created from pre-defined offerings do migrate fine. All hosts are running the same version Xen Server 6.2 SP1, There is no logs the when you click the migrate to host icon it does not pop up, while another vm created from pre-defined offer and from the same browser show the pop up when migrate to host is clicked. Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, 27 May 2014 4:58 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!! How many hosts do you have in your setup and how are they distributed across clusters? Are all hosts running the same version of the xenserver hypervisor? Do you see the issue only with custom offering; or is it seen if an instance has been created with any other offering? Anything in the cloudstack logs when you try and list the hosts for migration from the UI? Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From: Amin Samir [mailto:a...@opencloud.net.au] Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 8:12 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!! Hello, We have cloud stack 4.3 over centos our hypervisors are xen server 6.2 SP1 with latest updates, the VM's that are created from custom offering don't let us use the migrate host icon from the UI, however you can move them from the xen center console. Has anyone faced this issue before? Kind Regards
RE: 4.3 systemvm's are really 4.2?
Hello, Try this link, these templates even remediate the heartbleed vulnerability http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm64/ Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Derek Page [mailto:dp...@kayak.com] Sent: Thursday, 29 May 2014 12:19 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: 4.3 systemvm's are really 4.2? From a fresh install of cloudstack 4.3 and installing the 4.3 system vms from download.cloud.com http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-xen.vhd.bz2 If you look at the system vms their /etc/cloudstack-version is still 4.2 root@r-21-VM:~# cat /etc/cloudstack-release Cloudstack Release 4.2.0 Tue Jul 16 04:16:55 UTC 2013 This was causing a failure to deploy instances with the following stack trace. Caused by: com.cloud.exception.AgentUnavailableException: Resource [Host:5] is unreachable: Host 5: Unable to start instance due to Unable to send command. Upgrade in progress. Please contact administrator. at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1072) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:761) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:601) ... 37 more Caused by: com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to send command. Upgrade in progress. Please contact administrator. at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.sendCommandsToRouter(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3616) at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl$7.execute(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3051) at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.applyRules(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3903) at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.applyDhcpEntry(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3043) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:317) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150) at org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:91) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172) at org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204) at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy240.applyDhcpEntry(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.network.element.VirtualRouterElement.addDhcpEntry(VirtualRouterElement.java:921) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.NetworkOrchestrator.prepareElement(NetworkOrchestrator.java:1187) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.NetworkOrchestrator.prepareNic(NetworkOrchestrator.java:1309) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.NetworkOrchestrator.prepare(NetworkOrchestrator.java:1245) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:960) ... 39 more So from here I. Destroyed/Expunged all systemvm's Removed the secondary storage in cloudstack rm -fr /mnt/secondary/* recreated the secondary storage in cloudstack Pulled the systemvms back down using this command: $ sudo /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt -m /secondary -u http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-xen.vhd.bz2-h xenserver -F But still the systemvm's are at version 4.2 Next I manually hacked /etc/cloudstack-version to be 4.3 instead of 4.2 on the router and I was able to deploy instances. This is my only work around at the moment. Is there a later version of the system VM's? Or did someone forget to bump versions in /etc/cloudstack-version? Or am I completely doing something wrong? -- Derek Page Operations Engineer KAYAK
RE: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!!
Hi Devdeep, Thanks for replying, it is one cluster with 7 hosts, we still have room to migrate this host, in fact other machines created from pre-defined offerings do migrate fine. All hosts are running the same version Xen Server 6.2 SP1, There is no logs the when you click the migrate to host icon it does not pop up, while another vm created from pre-defined offer and from the same browser show the pop up when migrate to host is clicked. Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, 27 May 2014 4:58 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!! How many hosts do you have in your setup and how are they distributed across clusters? Are all hosts running the same version of the xenserver hypervisor? Do you see the issue only with custom offering; or is it seen if an instance has been created with any other offering? Anything in the cloudstack logs when you try and list the hosts for migration from the UI? Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From: Amin Samir [mailto:a...@opencloud.net.au] Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 8:12 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!! Hello, We have cloud stack 4.3 over centos our hypervisors are xen server 6.2 SP1 with latest updates, the VM's that are created from custom offering don't let us use the migrate host icon from the UI, however you can move them from the xen center console. Has anyone faced this issue before? Kind Regards
RE: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!!
Sorry forgot to mention this cloud stack is migrated twice before from 2.2.14 to 4.2.1 then 4.3 if this helps Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Amin Samir Sent: Tuesday, 27 May 2014 5:04 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!! Hi Devdeep, Thanks for replying, it is one cluster with 7 hosts, we still have room to migrate this host, in fact other machines created from pre-defined offerings do migrate fine. All hosts are running the same version Xen Server 6.2 SP1, There is no logs the when you click the migrate to host icon it does not pop up, while another vm created from pre-defined offer and from the same browser show the pop up when migrate to host is clicked. Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, 27 May 2014 4:58 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!! How many hosts do you have in your setup and how are they distributed across clusters? Are all hosts running the same version of the xenserver hypervisor? Do you see the issue only with custom offering; or is it seen if an instance has been created with any other offering? Anything in the cloudstack logs when you try and list the hosts for migration from the UI? Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From: Amin Samir [mailto:a...@opencloud.net.au] Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 8:12 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!! Hello, We have cloud stack 4.3 over centos our hypervisors are xen server 6.2 SP1 with latest updates, the VM's that are created from custom offering don't let us use the migrate host icon from the UI, however you can move them from the xen center console. Has anyone faced this issue before? Kind Regards
VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!!
Hello, We have cloud stack 4.3 over centos our hypervisors are xen server 6.2 SP1 with latest updates, the VM's that are created from custom offering don't let us use the migrate host icon from the UI, however you can move them from the xen center console. Has anyone faced this issue before? Kind Regards
VPN site to site with no cisco nor juniper on the customer end
Hello, Can anyone please advise if we can use site to site VPN and there is no Cisco nor Juniper routers on the other (customer end) for instance if the customer has Pfsense as his router and firewall , what shall we do? Is it possible or not? Our environment is as follows: ? MS 4.3 installed on CentOs 6.5, implemented in an advanced networking mode. ? Hypervisors are Xen Server 6.2 SP1. Thanks in advance for your support
VPN site to site with no cisco nor juniper on the customer end
Hello, Can anyone please advise if we can use site to site VPN and there is no Cisco nor Juniper routers on the other (customer end) for instance if the customer has Pfsense as his router and firewall , what shall we do? Is it possible or not? Our environment is as follows: ? MS 4.3 installed on CentOs 6.5, implemented in an advanced networking mode. ? Hypervisors are Xen Server 6.2 SP1. Thanks in advance for your support
RE: Upgrade from 4.1.1 + XS 6.0.2 to 4.3 + XS 6.2
It works for us on a lab environment, Original environment is: CentOs 6.5 (Management server) Cloud Stack 4.2.1 Xen Server 6.1 latest patches Target environment CentOs 6.5 (Management Server) Cloud Stack 4.3 Xen Server 6.2 Then upgraded to sp1 Then applied 1002, 1003, 1004 patches. We will be upgrading our production environment within one month would keep you posted if that helps. Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: France [mailto:mailingli...@isg.si] Sent: Tuesday, 29 April 2014 4:00 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Upgrade from 4.1.1 + XS 6.0.2 to 4.3 + XS 6.2 +1 from me, exactly the same situation. On 23/4/14 7:35 PM, Carlos Reategui wrote: Hi All, I would like to upgrade to Cloudstack 4.3 and also upgrade my XenServers to 6.2. I believe I've seen some comments about XS 6.2 only supported in a clean 4.3 install and not an upgrade. I am not able to find mention of this in the documentation. Any suggestions for how to go about this? thanks Carlos
Custom offering options does not allow you to migrate VM to other hosts
Hello, Has anyone used the new custom offering option in CS 4.3, when using it with a VM and then trying to move this VM to another host the API does not allow you, you have to either move it from the xen console or put the host to maintenance mode. Does anyone know why is that is it a bug? Or I did something wrong (xen tools is installed on the VM). Kind Regards Amin
RE: Custom offering options does not allow you to migrate VM to other hosts
Hi Rajesh, It is shared storage, and I have six hosts xen server 6.2 service pack and 1004 patch, cloud stack 4.3 (upgraded from 4.2.1 and 4.2.1 was upgraded originally from 2.2.14), there is nothing in the log file as when I click in the UI it does not produce the prompt where I select other available hosts, on the contrary when I do the same with I pre-defined offering with other VM the icon is clickable and it prompts me to move to another available host (same exact environment however the only difference is the VM is created with pre-defined offerings). I will see if the management log file produces anything, however I doubt it. Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2014 10:08 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Custom offering options does not allow you to migrate VM to other hosts Can you share more details. is the offering has storage type share/local? and offering other details. Share management log snippet which shows the exception/messages about the failure to migrate the vm. How many hosts are present incluster? Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Amin Samir [mailto:a...@opencloud.net.au] Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 7:00 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Custom offering options does not allow you to migrate VM to other hosts Hello, Has anyone used the new custom offering option in CS 4.3, when using it with a VM and then trying to move this VM to another host the API does not allow you, you have to either move it from the xen console or put the host to maintenance mode. Does anyone know why is that is it a bug? Or I did something wrong (xen tools is installed on the VM). Kind Regards Amin
RE: CloudStack 4.3 proper Advanced Network setup
Hello, I am not sure if 14.04 LTS is supported check out the installation link, I propose to use it with LTS 12.04 very easy link is enclosed. http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/installation.html http://www.greenhills.co.uk/2013/08/30/cloudstack-single-server-on-ubuntu-with-kvm.html Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Владислав Старков [mailto:vladislav.star...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 23 April 2014 1:26 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CloudStack 4.3 proper Advanced Network setup Hi there, I just installed CloudStack 4.3 on a single host (all-in-one). My host's setup: – Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 64bit – 6 1GbE NICs (3 in use and 3 not in use) – Primary storage on NFSv4 – Secondary storage on NFSv4 – KVM hypervisor only – Management server installed directly on this host (not on VM) My physical network setup: – 1 L2 switch with 3 different VLANs – VLAN 2 for NAS (Primary storage on NFSv4) – VLAN 10 for guests public traffic (there lives public IP addresses) – VLAN 100 for management traffic – VLAN 200 for guests traffic (there lives private IP addresses, so guests from different clusters can interact with each other) cat /etc/network/interfaces: # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). # The loopback network interface auto lo iface lo inet loopback # The primary network interface # CloudStack Primary storage traffic auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 10.10.10.11 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 10.10.10.0 broadcast 10.10.10.255 # dns-* options are implemented by the resolvconf package, if installed dns-nameservers 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4 dns-search cloud.example.com # CloudStack Management traffic auto eth1 iface eth1 inet static address 10.10.12.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 10.10.12.0 broadcast 10.10.12.255 gateway 10.10.12.1 auto eth2 iface eth2 inet manual # CloudStack Public traffic auto cloudbr0 iface cloudbr0 inet manual bridge_ports eth2.10 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 # CloudStack Guest traffic auto cloudbr1 iface cloudbr1 inet manual bridge_ports eth2.200 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 auto eth3 iface eth3 inet manual up ifconfig $IFACE 0.0.0.0 up down ifconfig $IFACE down auto eth4 iface eth4 inet manual up ifconfig $IFACE 0.0.0.0 up down ifconfig $IFACE down auto eth5 iface eth5 inet manual up ifconfig $IFACE 0.0.0.0 up down ifconfig $IFACE down The approximate network setup schema is depicted here: http://cl.ly/image/3z2D0w370H1M/o While setting up the first zone in administrator's UI I've faced with difficulties in setting up my advanced network correctly. (For ex. I've got this error Creating primary storage Something went wrong; please correct the following: zone wide storage pool is not supported for hypervisor type undefined, and so on) As I'm newbie to CloudStack and virtualization I'm not clear enough for me how CloudStack network should be setup in case I use multiple NICs and multiple VLANs on L2 physical switch. Could someone point me how should be setup my network for Zone1 with respect to network schema as I showed above? For education purposes, lets say we will use these networks: – 77.12.34.0/24 (for Public) – 10.10.10.0/24 (for zone's NAS – primary secondary storage) – 10.1.1.0/24 (for Guests VMs) – 10.10.12.0/24 (for management, if it required to be different subnet) As an answer to my question it would be awesome to get two things: 1) Content of /etc/network/interfaces (bridges and VLANs config in particular) 2) What should be entered on Step 3 – Setup Network (and substeps) in CloudStack Administrator's UI? Thanks in advance for helping! -- Vlad
RE: Cloud Stack 4.2.1 issue (Unable to start instance due to DB Exception)
Hello, Can anyone from the cloud stack guru's please help with the below issue? Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Amin Samir Sent: Tuesday, 1 April 2014 1:29 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Cloud Stack 4.2.1 issue (Unable to start instance due to DB Exception) Hello, We are facing an issue when we spin up a new instance with a new network (router VM), it gives the following error: Resource [Host:59] is unreachable: Host 59: Unable to start instance due to DB Exception on: com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4PreparedStatement@5126808a: INSERT INTO user_statistics (user_statistics.data_center_id, user_statistics.account_id, user_statistics.public_ip_address, user_statistics.device_id, user_statistics.device_type, user_statistics.network_id, user_statistics.net_bytes_received, user_statistics.net_bytes_sent, user_statistics.current_bytes_received, user_statistics.current_bytes_sent, user_statistics.agg_bytes_received, user_statistics.agg_bytes_sent) VALUES (1, 28, null, 360, _binary'DomainRouter', 237, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) Also we are facing this error every now and then: (DirectAgent-93:null) GetStorageStats Exception:SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_40The SR scan failed [opterr=uuid=870ed96e-d62b-428a-88dc-41afc75d311a]host:13944281-3f7e-4065-8580-1dc5b64cfdb1storageid: 098d4f7a-a040-3462-add1-d618d6ec53c1 However when spinning a new instance with an existing network (router VM) it works fine!! Has anyone faced this issue, your help would be much appreciated. Thanks
Cloud Stack 4.2.1 issue (Unable to start instance due to DB Exception)
Hello, We are facing an issue when we spin up a new instance with a new network (router VM), it gives the following error: Resource [Host:59] is unreachable: Host 59: Unable to start instance due to DB Exception on: com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4PreparedStatement@5126808a: INSERT INTO user_statistics (user_statistics.data_center_id, user_statistics.account_id, user_statistics.public_ip_address, user_statistics.device_id, user_statistics.device_type, user_statistics.network_id, user_statistics.net_bytes_received, user_statistics.net_bytes_sent, user_statistics.current_bytes_received, user_statistics.current_bytes_sent, user_statistics.agg_bytes_received, user_statistics.agg_bytes_sent) VALUES (1, 28, null, 360, _binary'DomainRouter', 237, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) Also we are facing this error every now and then: (DirectAgent-93:null) GetStorageStats Exception:SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_40The SR scan failed [opterr=uuid=870ed96e-d62b-428a-88dc-41afc75d311a]host:13944281-3f7e-4065-8580-1dc5b64cfdb1storageid: 098d4f7a-a040-3462-add1-d618d6ec53c1 However when spinning a new instance with an existing network (router VM) it works fine!! Has anyone faced this issue, your help would be much appreciated. Thanks
RE: CloudStack 4.2.1 XenServer version support
Hi Paul, Thanks for the tip. Kind Regards Amin From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Friday, 21 March 2014 6:29 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack 4.2.1 XenServer version support Hi Amir, Will 4.3.x support XenServer 6.2 in 'upgraded' management server installations? Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com From: Amin Samir [mailto:a...@opencloud.net.au mailto:a...@opencloud.net.au ] Sent: 21 March 2014 01:29 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack 4.2.1 XenServer version support Yes it is supported in new management server installation only, meaning if you upgrade from an earlier cloudstack version you will have only upgrade path to xen server 6.1, if you have a new cloud stack management installation then you can have xen server 6.2 for the compatibility matrix check out the below table. Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Peter Sadowski [mailto:peter.m.sadow...@gmail.com mailto:peter.m.sadow...@gmail.com ] Sent: Friday, 21 March 2014 1:04 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CloudStack 4.2.1 XenServer version support Hi, Since the release of CS 4.2.1 is XenServer 6.2 supported? In the install docs all I see is support up to version 6.0.2. Thx in advance, Peter Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroom http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: VM's start up for two or three minutes and then stops (After upgrade 4.2.1 rebuild)
Thanks France Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: France [mailto:mailingli...@isg.si] Sent: Tuesday, 18 March 2014 9:12 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: VM's start up for two or three minutes and then stops (After upgrade 4.2.1 rebuild) Try asking on dev list. Although im not sure, if you will get an answer. On 18/3/14 3:35 AM, Amin Samir wrote: Hello, After rebuilding management server, we cannot fire up new VM's, the VM starts up for two minutes and then stops. Our environment is upgraded from 2.2.14 to 4.2.1 cloud stack and xen server 5.6sp2 to the xen server 6.1 with the latest patches deployed. Here is what we receive in the logs: WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-124:null) Error while collecting disk stats from : You gave an invalid object reference. The object may have recently been deleted. The class parameter gives the type of reference given, and the handle parameter echoes the bad value given. ARN [apache.cloudstack.alerts] (DirectAgent-481:null) alertType:: 8 // dataCenterId:: 1 // podId:: 1 // clusterId:: null // message:: VM (name: Amin-After-Rebuild-test, id: 308) stopped unexpectedly on host id:62, availability zone id:1, pod id:1 Anyone has faced this error before, all our existing VM's are fine. Kind Regards Amin
VM's start up for two or three minutes and then stops (After upgrade 4.2.1 rebuild)
Hello, After rebuilding management server, we cannot fire up new VM's, the VM starts up for two minutes and then stops. Our environment is upgraded from 2.2.14 to 4.2.1 cloud stack and xen server 5.6sp2 to the xen server 6.1 with the latest patches deployed. Here is what we receive in the logs: WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-124:null) Error while collecting disk stats from : You gave an invalid object reference. The object may have recently been deleted. The class parameter gives the type of reference given, and the handle parameter echoes the bad value given. ARN [apache.cloudstack.alerts] (DirectAgent-481:null) alertType:: 8 // dataCenterId:: 1 // podId:: 1 // clusterId:: null // message:: VM (name: Amin-After-Rebuild-test, id: 308) stopped unexpectedly on host id:62, availability zone id:1, pod id:1 Anyone has faced this error before, all our existing VM's are fine. Kind Regards Amin
RE: Rebuilding Cloud Stack Management (Recovery Fails)
Hello, We figured out what was the issue, we thought of sharing it with you, we had to comment the /etc/hosts entry 127.0.1.1 and submit the right name and ip info, then commenced communicating with the hosts and DB. Kind Regards Amin Samir -Original Message- From: Amin Samir Sent: Thursday, 13 March 2014 9:55 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Rebuilding Cloud Stack Management (Recovery Fails) Hello, I would much appreciate if someone helps, our cloud stack server crashed due to hard disk failure, thankfully we had a mysql database dump and backup of /etc/cloudstack/ folder, we are following the following steps to recover it: 1) Replaced the failed hardisk, reinstalled Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, and ran apt-get dist-upgrade 2) Installed CS 4.2.1, usage, and mysql, modified my.cnf 3) cloudstack-setup-databases cloud:ourpassword@localhost --deploy-as=root:ourpassword -e file -m ourpassword -k ourpassword 4) mysql -u root -pourpassword cloud cloud-backup-date.sql 5) mysql -u root -pourpassword cloud_usage cloud-usage-backup-date.sql 6) Removing the Host General Tab Tags by editing the tags and un-checking each one in each host in the cluster. 7) Service cloudstack-management start, service cloudstack-usage start. 8) Reboot the system VM's The environment are as follows: ? 1 management server Ubuntu 12.04 LTS ? Cloud Stack 4.2.1 ? Xen Server 6.1 Fully patched as of today. Yet the tailing the log files give the following: Unable to reach Pool[1|NetworkFilesystem] com.cloud.exception.StorageUnavailableException: Resource [StoragePool:1] is unreachable: Unable to send command to the pool Unable to obtain VM statistics. Unable to obtain host 4 statistics. Can anyone please help how to recover this management server? Thanks in advance. Kind Regards Amin Samir
Re: ALARM - ACS reboots host servers!!!
Hello, This link addresses your issue. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3367 Amin Sent from my iPad On Mar 3, 2014, at 1:56 PM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote: The primary storage needs to be put in maintenance before doing any upgrade/reboot as mentioned in the previous mails. -Koushik On 03-Mar-2014, at 6:07 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Also, please note that in the bug you referenced it doesn't have a problem with the reboot being triggered, but with the fact that reboot never completes due to hanging NFS mount (which is why the reboot occurs, inaccessible primary storage). On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Or do you mean you have multiple primary storages and this one was not in use and put into maintenance? On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure I understand. How do you expect to reboot your primary storage while vms are running? It sounds like the host is being fenced since it cannot contact the resources it depends on. On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 02.03.2014 21:17, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: Hello guys, I've recently came across the bug CLOUDSTACK-5429 which has rebooted all of my host servers without properly shutting down the guest vms. I've simply upgraded and rebooted one of the nfs primary storage servers and a few minutes later, to my horror, i've found out that all of my host servers have been rebooted. Is it just me thinking so, or is this bug should be fixed ASAP and should be a blocker for any new ACS release. I mean not only does it cause downtime, but also possible data loss and server corruption. Hi Andrei, Do you have HA enabled and did you put that primary storage in maintenance mode before rebooting it? It's my understanding that ACS relies on the shared storage to perform HA so if the storage goes it's expected to go berserk. I've noticed similar behaviour in Xenserver pools without ACS. I'd imagine a cure for this would be to use network distributed filesystems like GlusterFS or CEPH. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
RE: Nginx reverse proxy to cloud stack
Hi Marty,
I have tried to restart the nginx, i did not yet enable the ssl , it is just
simple revere proxy from Nginx X back to cloud stack, and navigating to
http://amin.com.au/client will not work, because it still needs the 8080 port
in the URL.
The problem is that it fires up an API with /client/client/api, whilst it
should fire up /client/api, there is a duplication in the /client/client, which
I dont understand why.
simply what I am trying to do for now is to call amin.com.au from the web
browser to routed to http://localhost:8080/client via the Nginx reverse proxy
then authenticate and complete working with cloud stack management server.
Thanks in advance
Amin
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:38:47 +
Subject: Re: Nginx reverse proxy to cloud stack
From: msweet@gmail.com
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Hi Amin,
The error shown should have hopefully been fixed by adjusting the
proxy_pass, did you restart nginx?
Just to confirm, does navigating to https://amin.com.au/client/ load
fully but still result in a username/password incorrect (giving the
error shown above)?
Thanks,
Marty
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Amin Samir aminsamira...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi Marty,
thanks for you fast reply, editing the proxy_pass to be
http://localhost:8080 ; does not help, in regards to the location /, when I
recall the server from the browser I use amin.com.au and I have this
domain name set in the local hosts file. One more thing to mention is
cloud stack is working with its own URL fine.
The F12 error output is as follows:
htmlheadtitleApache Tomcat/6.0.35 - Error report/titlestyle!--H1
{font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:white;background-color:#525D76;font-size:22px;}
H2
{font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:white;background-color:#525D76;font-size:16px;}
H3
{font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:white;background-color:#525D76;font-size:14px;}
BODY
{font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:black;background-color:white;} B
{font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:white;background-color:#525D76;}
P
{font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;background:white;color:black;font-size:12px;}A
{color : black;}A.name {color : black;}HR {color : #525D76;}--/style
/headbodyh1HTTP Status 404 - /client/client/api/h1HR size=1
noshade=noshadepbtype/b Status report/ppbmessage/b
u/client/client/api/u/ppbdescription/b uThe requested
resource (/client/client/api) is not available./u/pHR size=1
noshade=noshadeh3Apache Tomcat/6.0.35/h3/body/html
Seems there is a duplication in /client/client/api-
I dont know how rectify this I am newbie cloudstack and nginx.
Thanks in advance.
Amin
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 04:15:40 +
Subject: Re: Nginx reverse proxy to cloud stack
From: msweet@gmail.com
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
CC: aminsamira...@hotmail.com
Hi Amin,
From first glance it seems that it could be related to your location
being '/' - although I personally haven't setup CS behind NGinx
before.
Is there any improvement if 'proxy_pass http://localhost:8080;' is
used? This should make the paths be the 'same' - although it should
all be relative anyway - worth a try.
You may also be able to see if any web errors are occurring by
profiling network on most new browsers (F12).
Also is there anything obvious in your management logs?
Let us know how you get on,
Marty
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Amin Samir aminsamira...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to configure Nginx to reverse proxy cloud stack to offload
SSL, I have done the following:
Installed the NginxCreated a virtual host with the following:server {
server_name amin.com.au;
location / {
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host $host;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Server $host;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
proxy_pass http://localhost:8080/client/;
}
When trying to log on to cloud stack it gives me wrong user name and
password.I even added the root to be root
/usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps/client/; index index.jsp;
(still does not authenticate me).
however when trying to log in using http://amin.com.au it authenticates
me and works smoothly.
Any idea why is this happening.
Thanks in advance for advise what might be the cause.
Amin
--
Marty
--
Marty
RE: Nginx reverse proxy to cloud stack
Hi Marty,
I might figured out what exactly I need, is a rewrite syntax to change
amin.com.au to amin.com.au/client, so whenever a browser hits the nginx with
amin.com.au it will change it to be amin.com.au/client
Thanks if you know how is this done.
Amin.
From: aminsamira...@hotmail.com
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Nginx reverse proxy to cloud stack
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:04:56 +
Hi Marty,
I have tried to restart the nginx, i did not yet enable the ssl , it is just
simple revere proxy from Nginx X back to cloud stack, and navigating to
http://amin.com.au/client will not work, because it still needs the 8080 port
in the URL.
The problem is that it fires up an API with /client/client/api, whilst it
should fire up /client/api, there is a duplication in the /client/client,
which I dont understand why.
simply what I am trying to do for now is to call amin.com.au from the web
browser to routed to http://localhost:8080/client via the Nginx reverse proxy
then authenticate and complete working with cloud stack management server.
Thanks in advance
Amin
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:38:47 +
Subject: Re: Nginx reverse proxy to cloud stack
From: msweet@gmail.com
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Hi Amin,
The error shown should have hopefully been fixed by adjusting the
proxy_pass, did you restart nginx?
Just to confirm, does navigating to https://amin.com.au/client/ load
fully but still result in a username/password incorrect (giving the
error shown above)?
Thanks,
Marty
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Amin Samir aminsamira...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Hi Marty,
thanks for you fast reply, editing the proxy_pass to be
http://localhost:8080 ; does not help, in regards to the location /, when
I recall the server from the browser I use amin.com.au and I have this
domain name set in the local hosts file. One more thing to mention is
cloud stack is working with its own URL fine.
The F12 error output is as follows:
htmlheadtitleApache Tomcat/6.0.35 - Error
report/titlestyle!--H1
{font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:white;background-color:#525D76;font-size:22px;}
H2
{font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:white;background-color:#525D76;font-size:16px;}
H3
{font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:white;background-color:#525D76;font-size:14px;}
BODY
{font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:black;background-color:white;}
B
{font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:white;background-color:#525D76;}
P
{font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;background:white;color:black;font-size:12px;}A
{color : black;}A.name {color : black;}HR {color : #525D76;}--/style
/headbodyh1HTTP Status 404 - /client/client/api/h1HR size=1
noshade=noshadepbtype/b Status report/ppbmessage/b
u/client/client/api/u/ppbdescription/b uThe requested
resource (/client/client/api) is not available./u/pHR size=1
noshade=noshadeh3Apache Tomcat/6.0.35/h3/body/html
Seems there is a duplication in /client/client/api-
I dont know how rectify this I am newbie cloudstack and nginx.
Thanks in advance.
Amin
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 04:15:40 +
Subject: Re: Nginx reverse proxy to cloud stack
From: msweet@gmail.com
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
CC: aminsamira...@hotmail.com
Hi Amin,
From first glance it seems that it could be related to your location
being '/' - although I personally haven't setup CS behind NGinx
before.
Is there any improvement if 'proxy_pass http://localhost:8080;' is
used? This should make the paths be the 'same' - although it should
all be relative anyway - worth a try.
You may also be able to see if any web errors are occurring by
profiling network on most new browsers (F12).
Also is there anything obvious in your management logs?
Let us know how you get on,
Marty
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Amin Samir aminsamira...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to configure Nginx to reverse proxy cloud stack to offload
SSL, I have done the following:
Installed the NginxCreated a virtual host with the following:server {
server_name amin.com.au;
location / {
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host $host;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Server $host;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
proxy_pass http://localhost:8080/client/;
}
When trying to log on to cloud stack it gives me wrong user name and
password.I even added the root to be root
/usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps/client/; index index.jsp;
(still does not authenticate me).
however when trying to log in using http://amin.com.au it
authenticates me and works smoothly.
Any idea why is this happening.
Thanks
Backup Restore procedures for Cloudstack environment (DRP)
Hello, Could anyone help with the backup and recovery procedures of cloudstack environment? I have noticed that documentation only states to backup the cloud cloud usage databases. However any recommendation on rebuilding the environment from scratch (in case of serious outage) steps procedures, I am trying to make a DRP for the environment. For instance: Install OS, management server. Initialize database, restore the database. Initiate cloudstack-setup command. Etc.. Thanks in advance for your help. Amin Samir
RE: SSVM won't start
Hello,
Two three paths that vhd-util needs to be in place.1)
/usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps/client/WEB-INF/classes/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/xenserver60/
(depends on your xen server version you may want to place also under
/xenserver56FP1 or /xenserver56).
2) cd
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/xenserver60
(depends on your xen server version you may want to place also under
/xenserver56FP1 or /xenserver56).
3) On the xen server it self, /opt/xensource/bin.
Try destroying the system vm's they will be created automatically.
Amin
Subject: Re: SSVM won't start
From: create...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 12:41:32 -0600
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Try the vhd-util that the docs tell you to download. Put that one in
/opt/xensource/bin
On Dec 3, 2013, at 9:20 AM, Sebastian Trampler
sebastian.tramp...@iisys.de wrote:
Hello again,
after copying the vhd-util on the XenServer to /opt/xensource/bin it first
seems to work, but the ssvm still won't come up.
After reading the log-messages I found the exception below. Any suggestions?
Regards
Sebastian
2013-12-03 16:08:34,861 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-472:null) VBD a6598c97-b54f-8d12-6785-a9eb1baff098 created for
com.cloud.agent.api.to.DiskTO@422d7ffa
2013-12-03 16:08:34,882 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-472:null) Creating VIF for s-4-VM on nic
[Nic:Guest-XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX-vlan://untagged]
2013-12-03 16:08:34,902 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-472:null) Created a vif 940b3765-dd22-a488-4391-25ef188a4ef9
on 2
2013-12-03 16:08:34,902 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-472:null) Creating VIF for s-4-VM on nic
[Nic:Control-169.254.1.83-null]
2013-12-03 16:08:34,929 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-472:null) already have a vif on dom0 for link local network
2013-12-03 16:08:35,208 DEBUG
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers to update status.
2013-12-03 16:08:35,210 DEBUG
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 networks to update RvR status.
2013-12-03 16:08:35,217 DEBUG
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers to update status.
2013-12-03 16:08:35,219 DEBUG
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 networks to update RvR status.
2013-12-03 16:08:35,355 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-472:null) Created a vif 4919c69e-b711-1ae4-7276-903cffd0524e
on 0
2013-12-03 16:08:35,355 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-472:null) Creating VIF for s-4-VM on nic
[Nic:Management-XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX-null]
2013-12-03 16:08:35,376 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-472:null) Created a vif 4ae05ccd-a0b3-5586-4542-9e4dde9250c2
on 1
2013-12-03 16:08:35,377 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-472:null) Creating VIF for s-4-VM on nic
[Nic:Storage-XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX-null]
2013-12-03 16:08:35,398 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-472:null) Created a vif 5f2d5aee-18c0-4c61-af26-edbbd50c7bed
on 3
2013-12-03 16:08:39,453 WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-472:null) Task failed! Task record: uuid:
bc1b04c5-b891-357c-6151-73f68806c136
nameLabel: Async.VM.start_on
nameDescription:
allowedOperations: []
currentOperations: {}
created: Tue Dec 03 16:08:35 CET 2013
finished: Tue Dec 03 16:08:38 CET 2013
status: failure
residentOn: com.xensource.xenapi.Host@8bc3a55e
progress: 1.0
type: none/
result:
errorInfo: [INTERNAL_ERROR, xenopsd internal error:
XenguestHelper.Xenctrl_dom_linux_build_failure(2, panic:
xc_dom_core.c:609: xc_dom_find_loader: no loader\\\)]
otherConfig: {}
subtaskOf: com.xensource.xenapi.Task@aaf13f6f
subtasks: []
2013-12-03 16:08:39,456 WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-472:null) Unable to start VM(s-4-VM) on
host(7c86321f-788d-4a4a-9837-8553b432d738) due to Task failed! Task record:
uuid: bc1b04c5-b891-357c-6151-73f68806c136
nameLabel: Async.VM.start_on
nameDescription:
allowedOperations: []
currentOperations: {}
created: Tue Dec 03 16:08:35 CET 2013
finished: Tue Dec 03 16:08:38 CET 2013
status: failure
residentOn: com.xensource.xenapi.Host@8bc3a55e
progress: 1.0
type: none/
result:
errorInfo: [INTERNAL_ERROR, xenopsd internal error:
XenguestHelper.Xenctrl_dom_linux_build_failure(2, panic:
VM's on cloudstack hosts not communicating to the internet (advanced networking mode)
Hello, I need support in an issue that i am facing, I have installed cloudstack in advanced mode, my VM's on cloudstack hosts not communicating to the internet, from the virtual router can not ping the gateway, however from the gateway can ping the system vm's and they are all tagged. Environment is as follows:1) Management Network / Pod is 192.168.1.0/24 Vlan 20 and the MS server Hyper visor ports are set to trunk all vlan, their native / untagged vlan is 20.2) Guests vlan ranges 200-1200 and subnet 10.1.1.0/243) Public network is 10.0.0.0/5 tagged vlan 50 (not real IP's)4) Management Server is Ubuntu 12, Cloudstack is 4.2, Xen Server 6.2 (open vswitch mode) Port forward is working fine and can access the vm's from outside networks, however can not access internet from vm's, logged in to the system virtual router and can not ping gateway. And verified the vlan's functionality with different physical virtual environments. Could anyone please help? Thanks in advance. Amin Samir
RE: VM's on cloudstack hosts not communicating to the internet (advanced networking mode)
Thanks for your fast reply Do I have to isn't the default outgoing traffic allowed from VM's? the only thing that is denied is incoming rules which i configured to allow 22 for my port forward rules. Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:33:50 +0800 Subject: Re: VM's on cloudstack hosts not communicating to the internet (advanced networking mode) From: dj199...@gmail.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Have you configured the Igress and Outgress of firewall rules? 2013/12/3 Amin Samir aminsamira...@hotmail.com Hello, I need support in an issue that i am facing, I have installed cloudstack in advanced mode, my VM's on cloudstack hosts not communicating to the internet, from the virtual router can not ping the gateway, however from the gateway can ping the system vm's and they are all tagged. Environment is as follows:1) Management Network / Pod is 192.168.1.0/24Vlan 20 and the MS server Hyper visor ports are set to trunk all vlan, their native / untagged vlan is 20.2) Guests vlan ranges 200-1200 and subnet 10.1.1.0/243) Public network is 10.0.0.0/5 tagged vlan 50 (not real IP's)4) Management Server is Ubuntu 12, Cloudstack is 4.2, Xen Server 6.2 (open vswitch mode) Port forward is working fine and can access the vm's from outside networks, however can not access internet from vm's, logged in to the system virtual router and can not ping gateway. And verified the vlan's functionality with different physical virtual environments. Could anyone please help? Thanks in advance. Amin Samir
RE: VM's on cloudstack hosts not communicating to the internet (advanced networking mode)
I had, allowed any, and still, when logging to the router from the xen center, can not ping my gateway, iptables shows outgoing allow source any to destination any, however another vm on the same vlan and same host (hypervisor) can ping my gateway. Any other suggestions? Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:51:38 +0800 Subject: Re: VM's on cloudstack hosts not communicating to the internet (advanced networking mode) From: dj199...@gmail.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org YOU need to configure outgress rules if your VR want to access the Internet. 2013/12/3 Amin Samir aminsamira...@hotmail.com Thanks for your fast reply Do I have to isn't the default outgoing traffic allowed from VM's? the only thing that is denied is incoming rules which i configured to allow 22 for my port forward rules. Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:33:50 +0800 Subject: Re: VM's on cloudstack hosts not communicating to the internet (advanced networking mode) From: dj199...@gmail.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Have you configured the Igress and Outgress of firewall rules? 2013/12/3 Amin Samir aminsamira...@hotmail.com Hello, I need support in an issue that i am facing, I have installed cloudstack in advanced mode, my VM's on cloudstack hosts not communicating to the internet, from the virtual router can not ping the gateway, however from the gateway can ping the system vm's and they are all tagged. Environment is as follows:1) Management Network / Pod is 192.168.1.0/24Vlan 20 and the MS server Hyper visor ports are set to trunk all vlan, their native / untagged vlan is 20.2) Guests vlan ranges 200-1200 and subnet 10.1.1.0/243) Public network is 10.0.0.0/5 tagged vlan 50 (not real IP's)4) Management Server is Ubuntu 12, Cloudstack is 4.2, Xen Server 6.2 (open vswitch mode) Port forward is working fine and can access the vm's from outside networks, however can not access internet from vm's, logged in to the system virtual router and can not ping gateway. And verified the vlan's functionality with different physical virtual environments. Could anyone please help? Thanks in advance. Amin Samir
RE: VM's on cloudstack hosts not communicating to the internet (advanced networking mode)
Hi but i did not select security groups in the zone wizard, how can i do this now or do i have to recreate the zone? I found issue with no resolution exactly similar to what is happening.http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-users/201310.mbox/%3c1382640326.52696ac6e7...@webmail.manske.org%3E Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 11:29:55 +0800 Subject: Re: VM's on cloudstack hosts not communicating to the internet (advanced networking mode) From: dj199...@gmail.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cloudstack 4.2 is a bit different from 4.0.I have met your problem before.You need not only configure firewall rules but also security group about egress. 2013/12/3 Amin Samir aminsamira...@hotmail.com I had, allowed any, and still, when logging to the router from the xen center, can not ping my gateway, iptables shows outgoing allow source any to destination any, however another vm on the same vlan and same host (hypervisor) can ping my gateway. Any other suggestions? Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:51:38 +0800 Subject: Re: VM's on cloudstack hosts not communicating to the internet (advanced networking mode) From: dj199...@gmail.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org YOU need to configure outgress rules if your VR want to access the Internet. 2013/12/3 Amin Samir aminsamira...@hotmail.com Thanks for your fast reply Do I have to isn't the default outgoing traffic allowed from VM's? the only thing that is denied is incoming rules which i configured to allow 22 for my port forward rules. Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:33:50 +0800 Subject: Re: VM's on cloudstack hosts not communicating to the internet (advanced networking mode) From: dj199...@gmail.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Have you configured the Igress and Outgress of firewall rules? 2013/12/3 Amin Samir aminsamira...@hotmail.com Hello, I need support in an issue that i am facing, I have installed cloudstack in advanced mode, my VM's on cloudstack hosts not communicating to the internet, from the virtual router can not ping the gateway, however from the gateway can ping the system vm's and they are all tagged. Environment is as follows:1) Management Network / Pod is 192.168.1.0/24Vlan 20 and the MS server Hyper visor ports are set to trunk all vlan, their native / untagged vlan is 20.2) Guests vlan ranges 200-1200 and subnet 10.1.1.0/243) Public network is 10.0.0.0/5 tagged vlan 50 (not real IP's)4) Management Server is Ubuntu 12, Cloudstack is 4.2, Xen Server 6.2 (open vswitch mode) Port forward is working fine and can access the vm's from outside networks, however can not access internet from vm's, logged in to the system virtual router and can not ping gateway. And verified the vlan's functionality with different physical virtual environments. Could anyone please help? Thanks in advance. Amin Samir
RE: VM's on cloudstack hosts not communicating to the internet (advanced networking mode)
Hello, I'd like to thank you all for your support, it turned out it switch port issue, I will reconfigure the switch port security and it should work. Thanks Amin. From: shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: VM's on cloudstack hosts not communicating to the internet (advanced networking mode) Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 05:20:35 + On 03-Dec-2013, at 10:41 am, Jayapal Reddy Uradi jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, Router reach public gateway/internet without egress rule. If only adding a egress rule would fix all networking issues. :) snip a lot -- @shankerbalan M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867 shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, Bangalore - 560 055 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: VM's on cloudstack hosts not communicating to the internet (advanced networking mode)
Thanks Shanker, really appreciate all your support guys. Amin From: shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: VM's on cloudstack hosts not communicating to the internet (advanced networking mode) Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 06:37:12 + On 03-Dec-2013, at 11:44 am, Amin Samir aminsamira...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello, I'd like to thank you all for your support, it turned out it switch port issue, I will reconfigure the switch port security and it should work. I was inspired to make a blog post about it. http://shankerbalan.net/blog/internet-not-working-on-cloudstack-vms/ Hth. -- @shankerbalan M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867 shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, Bangalore - 560 055 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2 fails
Hi Sanjeev, I have tried to file a bug but could not find cloudstack in the list of software that i can file a bug, the following what i have found, would you please advise where to file it?Ant: Ant is a Java based build tool.Apache httpd‑2: Apache HTTP Server Version 2Apache httpd‑test: Test framework and utilities for the Apache HTTP ServerAPR: Apache Portable Runtime.JMeter: Pure Java desktop application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performanceLenya: Lenya is a Content Management System based on XML and XSLT. One of its core components is Apache Cocoon.Log4j: A reliable, fast and extensible logging library for Java.POI: The POI project consists of complete ports of popular productivity office suite file formats.Rivet: Apache Rivet is a system for creating dynamic web content via the Tcl programming language integrated with the Apache Web Server.Steve: Apache SteveTaglibs: A collection of JavaServer Pages (JSP) custom tag libraries useful in building web applicationsTomcat 6: A Servlet container implementing the Servlet Specification v2.5 and the Java Server Pages (JSP) Specification v2.1.Tomcat 7: A Servlet container implementing the Servlet Specification v3.0 and the Java Server Pages (JSP) Specification v2.2.Tomcat 8: A Servlet container implementing the Servlet Specification v3.1 and the Java Server Pages (JSP) Specification TBD, EL specification 3.0 and WebSocket specification 1.0Tomcat Connectors: Provides integration between Apache Tomcat and a range of web serversTomcat Modules: Additional modules for Apache Tomcat. Modules may be for a specific Tomcat version or may work with several. See each module's documentation for details.Tomcat Native: Provides an APR based native HTTP and AJP connectors for TomcatWebSH: Thanks in advanceAmin From: sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2 fails Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 08:53:38 + This looks like a bug . Please report the issue in issues.apache.org with DB schema before upgrade and management server logs. -Original Message- From: Amin Samir [mailto:aminsamira...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 12:56 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2 fails Hello, I am new to cloudstack and I have an assignment to upgrade a current production environment from 2.2.14 to 4.2, I follow the exact 4.2 release documentation and then the upgrade fails the output of the log file states the following: Duplicate column name 'hypervisor_version' Unable to execute upgrade script: /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-2214to30.sql System integrity check failed. Refuse to startup Could anyone help please with the aforementioned issue? I am also not sure how to collaborate with the team is it the right way to send an inquiry mail to users@cloudstack.apache.org? or there are other ways to ask questions? Amin SamirSystems Administrator
Re: Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2 fails
Hi Sailaja, Thanks for your response, How can I check for the exception which were logged during the upgrade? Amin Sent from my iPad On Nov 8, 2013, at 5:41 PM, Sailaja Mada sailaja.m...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, I have observed Duplicate column name 'hypervisor_version' only when I tried to restart the Management server second time which was failed to start for the first time soon after upgrade . Analysis : The first script that gets executed during 2.2.14 to 4.2 is /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-2214to30.sql . In this sql script , the first sql stmt is : ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`host` ADD COLUMN `hypervisor_version` varchar(32) COMMENT 'hypervisor version' AFTER hypervisor_type; == There is a possibility that the schema-2214to30.sql got executed already during the first attempt of upgrade. This would have created hypervisor_version column which resulted duplicate entry failure during second attempt. Can you please check for Exceptions which were logged during first attempt of upgrade. Thanks , Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Amin Samir [mailto:aminsamira...@hotmail.com] Sent: 08 November 2013 12:56 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2 fails Hello, I am new to cloudstack and I have an assignment to upgrade a current production environment from 2.2.14 to 4.2, I follow the exact 4.2 release documentation and then the upgrade fails the output of the log file states the following: Duplicate column name 'hypervisor_version' Unable to execute upgrade script: /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-2214to30.sql System integrity check failed. Refuse to startup Could anyone help please with the aforementioned issue? I am also not sure how to collaborate with the team is it the right way to send an inquiry mail to users@cloudstack.apache.org? or there are other ways to ask questions? Amin SamirSystems Administrator
Re: Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2 fails
Hello, Forgot to mention my environment is as follows: 1) One Ubuntu 10.04 as Management server 2) One Ubuntu 10.4 as NFS server. 3) two Xen servers 5.6 sp2. If that's help. Amin Samir Thanks in advance. Sent from my iPad On Nov 8, 2013, at 5:41 PM, Sailaja Mada sailaja.m...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, I have observed Duplicate column name 'hypervisor_version' only when I tried to restart the Management server second time which was failed to start for the first time soon after upgrade . Analysis : The first script that gets executed during 2.2.14 to 4.2 is /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-2214to30.sql . In this sql script , the first sql stmt is : ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`host` ADD COLUMN `hypervisor_version` varchar(32) COMMENT 'hypervisor version' AFTER hypervisor_type; == There is a possibility that the schema-2214to30.sql got executed already during the first attempt of upgrade. This would have created hypervisor_version column which resulted duplicate entry failure during second attempt. Can you please check for Exceptions which were logged during first attempt of upgrade. Thanks , Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Amin Samir [mailto:aminsamira...@hotmail.com] Sent: 08 November 2013 12:56 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2 fails Hello, I am new to cloudstack and I have an assignment to upgrade a current production environment from 2.2.14 to 4.2, I follow the exact 4.2 release documentation and then the upgrade fails the output of the log file states the following: Duplicate column name 'hypervisor_version' Unable to execute upgrade script: /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-2214to30.sql System integrity check failed. Refuse to startup Could anyone help please with the aforementioned issue? I am also not sure how to collaborate with the team is it the right way to send an inquiry mail to users@cloudstack.apache.org? or there are other ways to ask questions? Amin SamirSystems Administrator
Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2 fails
Hello, I am new to cloudstack and I have an assignment to upgrade a current production environment from 2.2.14 to 4.2, I follow the exact 4.2 release documentation and then the upgrade fails the output of the log file states the following: Duplicate column name 'hypervisor_version' Unable to execute upgrade script: /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-2214to30.sql System integrity check failed. Refuse to startup Could anyone help please with the aforementioned issue? I am also not sure how to collaborate with the team is it the right way to send an inquiry mail to users@cloudstack.apache.org? or there are other ways to ask questions? Amin SamirSystems Administrator
