Re: Unzulässiger Zugriff auf einen Speicherbereich
Hallo! Es hilft wenn Du die libmysql.dll vom mysql\bin nach apache\bin kopierst, damit er die richtige nimmt! Aus C:\Windows\ kannst Du die getrost wieder löschen. Du könntest anstelle von kopieren, aber auch sagen, welche DLL er laden soll. Also bevor Du PHP lädst. LoadFile C:/mysql/bin/libmysql.dll LoadModule php5_module . .. Gruß Mario On 6/2/07, Jan Bro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hallo Bjoern, danke für Deine schnelle Antwort meine Ergänzungen folgen: - Original Message - From: Bjoern Hoehrmann To: users-de@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Unzulässiger Zugriff auf einen Speicherbereich Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 22:28:20 +0200 * Jan Bro wrote: Aber die Verbindung PHP mit MySQL läuft nicht (jedes für sich läuft). Im Apache Log steht Unzulässiger Zugriff auf einen Speicherbereich. Du musst schon mehr darüber sagen. Ok, mach ich gern, die wesentlichen Infos habe ich denke ich schon gegeben. Wann genau passiert das? Was genau steht in dem logs? bei jedem Start / Restart des Apache fügt er der Log-File folgendes hinzu PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'C:\\Programmierung\\php\\ext\\php_mysqli.dll' - Unzul\xe4ssiger Zugriff auf einen Speicherbereich.\r\n in Unknown on line 0 Wie hast du die Software über die Standardein- stellungen konfiguriert? Die Fehlermeldung suggeriert dass eine der Anwendungen etwas tut, das schlicht falsch ist; das kann im Prinzip nur passieren wenn die Anwendung fehlerhaft programmiert wurde. Es ist natürlich auch nicht auszuschliessen das z.B. ein Virus das Verhalten der Anwendung beeinflusst. Aber mit ner halben Zeile Fehlerbeschreibung kann man da nicht viel zu sagen. hier noch die veränderten Zeilen der PHP.ini extension_dir = C:\Programmierung\php\ext [...] ;extension=php_mysql.dll extension=php_mysqli.dll ;extension=php_oci8.dll Die PHP.ini ist im Windows Verzeichnis ebenso die libmySQL.dll die php_mysqli.dll ist korrekt im Extension Verzeichnis. Ich mach das auch nicht das erste Mal. Das System ist 48h alt. Virus ist auszuschließen. Gruß Jan = -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: Unzulässiger Zugriff auf einen Speicherbereich
Vielen Dank für den Tipp. Heute Nachmittag hatte ich eine ähnliche Idee und sämtliche dll's und ini's aus Windows entfernt. Siehe da, es ging! Ergo: Es sieht so aus, als ob mit SP2 WinXP die Ausführung bzw. das Ansprechen innerhalb des Windows Baums unterbindet. Auf meinem Alt-System war das vermutlich kein Problem, da dort SP2 erst nachträglich installiert wurde. Gruß aus dem Odenwald - Original Message - From: James Blond To: users-de@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Unzulässiger Zugriff auf einen Speicherbereich Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:53:44 +0200 Hallo! Es hilft wenn Du die libmysql.dll vom mysql\bin nach apache\bin kopierst, damit er die richtige nimmt! Aus C:\Windows\ kannst Du die getrost wieder löschen. Du könntest anstelle von kopieren, aber auch sagen, welche DLL er laden soll. Also bevor Du PHP lädst. LoadFile C:/mysql/bin/libmysql.dll LoadModule php5_module . .. Gruß Mario On 6/2/07, Jan Bro wrote: Hallo Bjoern, danke für Deine schnelle Antwort meine Ergänzungen folgen: - Original Message - From: Bjoern Hoehrmann To: users-de@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Unzulässiger Zugriff auf einen Speicherbereich Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 22:28:20 +0200 * Jan Bro wrote: Aber die Verbindung PHP mit MySQL läuft nicht (jedes für sich läuft). Im Apache Log steht Unzulässiger Zugriff auf einen Speicherbereich. Du musst schon mehr darüber sagen. Ok, mach ich gern, die wesentlichen Infos habe ich denke ich schon gegeben. Wann genau passiert das? Was genau steht in dem logs? bei jedem Start / Restart des Apache fügt er der Log-File folgendes hinzu PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'C:\\Programmierung\\php\\ext\\php_mysqli.dll' - Unzul\xe4ssiger Zugriff auf einen Speicherbereich.\r\n in Unknown on line 0 Wie hast du die Software über die Standardein- stellungen konfiguriert? Die Fehlermeldung suggeriert dass eine der Anwendungen etwas tut, das schlicht falsch ist; das kann im Prinzip nur passieren wenn die Anwendung fehlerhaft programmiert wurde. Es ist natürlich auch nicht auszuschliessen das z.B. ein Virus das Verhalten der Anwendung beeinflusst. Aber mit ner halben Zeile Fehlerbeschreibung kann man da nicht viel zu sagen. hier noch die veränderten Zeilen der PHP.ini extension_dir = C:\Programmierung\php\ext [...] ;extension=php_mysql.dll extension=php_mysqli.dll ;extension=php_oci8.dll Die PHP.ini ist im Windows Verzeichnis ebenso die libmySQL.dll die php_mysqli.dll ist korrekt im Extension Verzeichnis. Ich mach das auch nicht das erste Mal. Das System ist 48h alt. Virus ist auszuschließen. Gruß Jan = -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- = -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: Unzulässiger Zugriff auf einen Speicherbereich
Vielen Dank für den Tipp. Heute Nachmittag hatte ich eine ähnliche Idee und sämtliche dll's und ini's aus Windows entfernt. Siehe da, es ging! Ergo: Es sieht so aus, als ob mit SP2 WinXP die Ausführung bzw. das Ansprechen innerhalb des Windows Baums unterbindet. Auf meinem Alt-System war das vermutlich kein Problem, da dort SP2 erst nachträglich installiert wurde. Gruß aus dem Odenwald - Original Message - From: James Blond To: users-de@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Unzulässiger Zugriff auf einen Speicherbereich Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:53:44 +0200 Hallo! Es hilft wenn Du die libmysql.dll vom mysql\bin nach apache\bin kopierst, damit er die richtige nimmt! Aus C:\Windows\ kannst Du die getrost wieder löschen. Du könntest anstelle von kopieren, aber auch sagen, welche DLL er laden soll. Also bevor Du PHP lädst. LoadFile C:/mysql/bin/libmysql.dll LoadModule php5_module . .. Gruß Mario On 6/2/07, Jan Bro wrote: Hallo Bjoern, danke für Deine schnelle Antwort meine Ergänzungen folgen: - Original Message - From: Bjoern Hoehrmann To: users-de@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Unzulässiger Zugriff auf einen Speicherbereich Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 22:28:20 +0200 * Jan Bro wrote: Aber die Verbindung PHP mit MySQL läuft nicht (jedes für sich läuft). Im Apache Log steht Unzulässiger Zugriff auf einen Speicherbereich. Du musst schon mehr darüber sagen. Ok, mach ich gern, die wesentlichen Infos habe ich denke ich schon gegeben. Wann genau passiert das? Was genau steht in dem logs? bei jedem Start / Restart des Apache fügt er der Log-File folgendes hinzu PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'C:\\Programmierung\\php\\ext\\php_mysqli.dll' - Unzul\xe4ssiger Zugriff auf einen Speicherbereich.\r\n in Unknown on line 0 Wie hast du die Software über die Standardein- stellungen konfiguriert? Die Fehlermeldung suggeriert dass eine der Anwendungen etwas tut, das schlicht falsch ist; das kann im Prinzip nur passieren wenn die Anwendung fehlerhaft programmiert wurde. Es ist natürlich auch nicht auszuschliessen das z.B. ein Virus das Verhalten der Anwendung beeinflusst. Aber mit ner halben Zeile Fehlerbeschreibung kann man da nicht viel zu sagen. hier noch die veränderten Zeilen der PHP.ini extension_dir = C:\Programmierung\php\ext [...] ;extension=php_mysql.dll extension=php_mysqli.dll ;extension=php_oci8.dll Die PHP.ini ist im Windows Verzeichnis ebenso die libmySQL.dll die php_mysqli.dll ist korrekt im Extension Verzeichnis. Ich mach das auch nicht das erste Mal. Das System ist 48h alt. Virus ist auszuschließen. Gruß Jan = -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- = -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache+ssl config
OK, at one point in my life I had something working for a very brief period that looked like https. Unfortunately after a few days... it stopped. Never got it working again... So I'm trying to get sane directions working and I'm pretty hosed... apache will start but https doesn't respond. This seems fairly common. [Sat Jun 02 22:09:55 2007] [info] Init: Seeding PRNG with 0 bytes of entropy [Sat Jun 02 22:09:55 2007] [info] Init: Generating temporary RSA private keys (512/1024 bits) [Sat Jun 02 22:09:55 2007] [info] Init: Generating temporary DH parameters (512/1024 bits) [Sat Jun 02 22:09:55 2007] [warn] Init: Session Cache is not configured [hint: SSLSessionCache] [Sat Jun 02 22:09:55 2007] [info] Init: Initializing (virtual) servers for SSL [Sat Jun 02 22:09:55 2007] [info] Server: Apache/2.2.3, Interface: mod_ssl/2.2.3, Library: OpenSSL/0.9.8c [Sat Jun 02 22:09:55 2007] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper: /usr/lib/apache2/suexec) [Sat Jun 02 22:09:55 2007] [info] mod_fcgid: Process manager 16591 started [Sat Jun 02 22:09:55 2007] [info] Init: Seeding PRNG with 0 bytes of entropy [Sat Jun 02 22:09:55 2007] [info] Init: Generating temporary RSA private keys (512/1024 bits) [Sat Jun 02 22:09:55 2007] [info] Init: Generating temporary DH parameters (512/1024 bits) [Sat Jun 02 22:09:55 2007] [info] Init: Initializing (virtual) servers for SSL [Sat Jun 02 22:09:55 2007] [info] Server: Apache/2.2.3, Interface: mod_ssl/2.2.3, Library: OpenSSL/0.9.8c [Sat Jun 02 22:09:55 2007] [notice] Apache/2.2.3 (Debian) mod_ssl/2.2.3 OpenSSL/0.9.8c configured -- resuming normal operations [Sat Jun 02 22:09:55 2007] [info] Server built: Mar 27 2007 14:54:26 The response from Firefox is some error called has sent an incorrect or unexpected message. Error Code -12263 I have Directives in apache.conf for: Listen 443 Directives in ssl.conf IfModule mod_ssl.c # added by me. SSLEngine on SSLCertificateFile /etc/apache2/ssl/host.cert SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/apache2/ssl/host.key NOTE: I also have SsLSessionCache called out even though the logs say I don't. It's the debian default so I'm kind of wtf? on this one. Now, I have about 100 questions that I've been searching for all night long. I'm either hitting the wrong keywords or just can't find anything. First. If I want to have both SSL and non-SSL Virtual Hosts: It is my understanding that I can only have one HTTPS host but many HTTP hosts (chicken and egg). For the most part, this is fine. I'm primarily looking at a http+https host and perhaps smaller (static) http sites. It's fairly obvious to me that I don't have any clue where to put the SSLEngine/SSLCertificate* directives becuase they just don't act like they are being considered at all. So I'm asking if someone has some concise information on how this can be done I assume that no matter what I want to do I have to leave the 'Listen 443' directive in Section 1 of apache.conf. true/false? I suspect that the SSL Directives I want to use have to be entered into a VirtualHost Directive like: VirtualHost *:443/ SSLEngine on SSLCertificateFile ... SSLCertificateKeyFile ... /// And other stuff there with directories and cgi-bin directories... /VirtualHost And so I have to write a *lot* of stuff for the HTTPS stuff to work. Seems that for just about every directive out there (cgi, fcgi, ...) I have to darn near copy and repeat for HTTPS. This seems incorrect because it's repetative, lengthy, and does nothing to restrict sections to only HTTPS. I haven't any idea how to make certain areas HTTP only and others HTTPS only but it's probably related to SSLRequire. Unfortunately, since I have no SSL working at all my ability to investigate this is slightly limited.. ;) So, what's a good practice for doing this kind of stuff. Am I even close? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_rewrite syntax
-Original Message- From: Dustin Schuemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 3:59 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_rewrite syntax I just want to redirect people that go to http://smallgroup.lausanne.org to https://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=qgyWxi2%2fyXBXcqC4Hm6PR g%3d%3d with mod_rewrite. What is the syntax for this. Luckily, there is excellent documentation to help you in your work: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/misc/rewriteguide.html If, when you've read and digested the docs and tried out a few things, you still can't get it working as you desire, post back with descriptions of what you tried, what went wrong, extracts from the rewrite log, and so on... Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. Dustin Schuemann Network Engineer/Lead Programmer O: 616.235.0725 F: 616.235.0784 [EMAIL PROTECTED] AMS/The Support Dept. 549 Ottawa Ave N.W. Suite 103 Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503 This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Memory leak in Apache?
Hi All, I was referring to http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/misc/perf-tuning.html and the below paragraph is a snippet from the given url I am not clear about the which memory leaks it is referring.I have highlighted that part. Related to process creation is process death induced by the MaxRequestsPerChildhttp://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mpm_common.html#maxrequestsperchildsetting. By default this is 0, which means that there is no limit to the number of requests handled per child. If your configuration currently has this set to some very low number, such as 30, you may want to bump this up significantly. If you are running SunOS or an old version of Solaris, limit this to 1 or so because of memory leaks. Can somebody explain me the above memory leaks?Is it fixed in the Apache2.2onwards release, also in case of Linux OS do we need to follow the same procedure as that of SunOS for the param MaxRequestPerChild. Thanks in advance. -A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tuning mod_rewrite
Hi All,
I have a .htaccess file which is working perfectly for redirecting root (/)
pages to be searched to a subfolder. The rule is below ...
=
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/(profile|images)$
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /$1/ [L,R]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/mydomainnet/
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /mydomainnet/$1
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www.)?mydomain.net$
RewriteRule ^(/)?$ mydomainnet/index.html [L]
=
So.. .when I type mydomain.net it will search into mydomainnet folder. But
the problem is, when I type mydomain.net/mydomainnet/ .. It still function
as when I just type mydomain.net . How can I abstracting the mydomainnet
subfolder, so that when I go to mydomain.net/mydomainnet/ it will go to an
error page ?
Thanks,
Feris
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Access problem with https port
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! renu tiwari escribió: I am able to access the webserver page with HTTP port but am not able to access with HTTPS port. ... Is that becoz Apache 2.2.3 is already installed on this machine , there could be any conflict? How did you started the httpd daemon? (/path/to/apachectl startssl could do the trick) Is the https port being used by another application? (netstat -pan |grep 443 will answer that) Hope this helps... Greetings from Spain! - -- David Blanco - Programación y sistemas Publicinet (Publicidad-Cine-Internet, S.L.) Urzaiz, 71, entlo, izda. -- 36204 Vigo Telf 902.014.606 -- http://www.publicinet.net -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGY8xJdbgIy1SiWTARAnr4AJ4xurzroRNkZPJ6fRXaiUtsgfZZGACdFIic fAPJShLhkAUvsBJefaroTXc= =S0ZF -END PGP SIGNATURE- - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Launching one more unwanted daemon
On 6/3/07, Arnab Ganguly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I am using apache2.2 with MPM model as Worker in Solaris 5.9 .I have the following configuration. StartServers 1 ServerLimit 1 MaxClient 128 MaxSpareThreads 128 MinSpareThreads 1 ThreadsPerChild 128 MaxRequestPerChild 0 My requirement is to handle all the request by single process and want this process to be active through out.Issue I get is that after Apache runs for a longer time, one new process is launched apart from the active process which was handling all the request. I am not sure as why this new process is getting launched although I kept ServerLimit and StartServers both as 1.Is the MaxRequestPerChild 0 is creating the problem, as due to overload one more process is getting launched or any particular module is responsible for the above?What to do to prevent this? With Startservers 1 there will be two processes. A main process, and one child. IF this is what you are seeing there is nothing peculiar going on. BTW, why is it that you don't want more than one process? Krist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bremgarten b. Bern, Switzerland -- A: It reverses the normal flow of conversation. Q: What's wrong with top-posting? A: Top-posting. Q: What's the biggest scourge on plain text email discussions? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite problem
Hi List! I am trying to configure a rule with mod_rewrite, which allow me to change the value of one script parameter. I want the script to foward me to an error page when introducing service=wfs in the request The sevice=wfs parameter can be in all positions This is my line: RewriteRule ^/cgi-bin/wms\?(.*)service=wfs$ /error.html Is it correct? If i put the line as follows, it works perfectly: RewriteRule ^/cgi-bin/wms\? /error.html But when I add the service parameter, it executes the script and it does not forward me to that page, (I mean as follow:) RewriteRule ^/cgi-bin/wms\?service=wfs /error.html Thank you very much.
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite problem
On 6/4/07, José Ramón López [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List!
I am trying to configure a rule with mod_rewrite, which allow me to change
the value of one script parameter.
I want the script to foward me to an error page when introducing
service=wfs in the request
The sevice=wfs parameter can be in all positions
This is my line:
RewriteRule ^/cgi-bin/wms\?(.*)service=wfs$ /error.html
Is it correct?
If i put the line as follows, it works perfectly:
RewriteRule ^/cgi-bin/wms\? /error.html
But when I add the service parameter, it executes the script and it does
not forward me to that page, (I mean as follow:)
RewriteRule ^/cgi-bin/wms\?service=wfs /error.html
RewriteRule doesn't match against the query string. You will need to
use a RewriteCond for this.
something like this:
RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING}^service=wfs$
RewriteRule ^/cgi-bin/wms$ /error.html
Krist
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bremgarten b. Bern, Switzerland
--
A: It reverses the normal flow of conversation.
Q: What's wrong with top-posting?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What's the biggest scourge on plain text email discussions?
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Memory leak in Apache?
On 6/4/07, Arnab Ganguly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I was referring to http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/misc/perf-tuning.html and the below paragraph is a snippet from the given url I am not clear about the which memory leaks it is referring.I have highlighted that part. Related to process creation is process death induced by the MaxRequestsPerChild setting. By default this is 0, which means that there is no limit to the number of requests handled per child. If your configuration currently has this set to some very low number, such as 30, you may want to bump this up significantly. If you are running SunOS or an old version of Solaris, limit this to 1 or so because of memory leaks. Can somebody explain me the above memory leaks?Is it fixed in the Apache2.2 onwards release, also in case of Linux OS do we need to follow the same procedure as that of SunOS for the param MaxRequestPerChild. It can't be fixed in an apache version because it is a bug in the OS libraries, not in apache. There are no known memory leaks in apache, but if you are using leaky libraries (via php, mod_perl, etc) or your OS has leaks in its base libraries, then over time apache may use more an more memory. By flushing the processes every now and then, this problem is mitigated. I believe that you won't see the OS leak problem on any modern OS (including Linux) so you can leave MaxRequestsPerChild at 0. If you find that memory usage is increasing without bound (perhaps because of some third-party library) then you can always go back and reset it. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ApacheConf 6.0
Software advertisement by a third party on a list ? Isn't this a little spamish ?? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite and authentication
I've got a section of the website that I want only .htaccess authenticated users to be able to access, but I also want to push them to https://domain.name if they accidentally type in http://domain.name. If I throw both rules into my .htaccess I'm prompted to authenticate, then mod_rewrite fires, and then I have to authenticate again. Is there a way I can tell apache to do the mod_rewrite first, then authenticate? Apache 1.3.29 on OpenBSD 4.1 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Outgoing filter ends in oom
On 6/3/07, Cryptronic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HI all, I have a problem concerning the outgoing filter of apache 2.2.3 with mpm worker from the debian repository. the problem is the following: when included a output filter, perl or c based, i get sometimes the situation that a single apache process allocates all available memory and swap. This ends in a oom situation. I tried using a different mpm: prefork, but there is the problem that the allocation process happens more often. With worker it happens 1 time in 4-7 days. I also tried limiting the allocation of memory by using the following global configuration settings: RLimitMEM 1 2 RLimitCPU 90 120 MaxMemFree 50 The RLimit stuff affects on child processes of the apache worker processes (like CGI scripts, for example). You should direct your question to the module developers list: http://httpd.apache.org/lists.html#modules-dev Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] auth LDAP issue, help
Hi, I am trying to get ldap auth working, what am i doing wrong? this is my config Directory d:/websites/ldaptest AuthType basic AuthBasicProvider ldap AuthName LdapTest AuthLDAPURL ldap://ldap.com/o=somewhere?cn?sub AuthLDAPBindDN cn=admin,o=somewhere AuthLDAPBindPassword pw AllowOverride None Order allow,deny Allow from 172.30 Allow from 10.1 require valid-user /Directory when i hit the url, i am asked to login, when i do, it asks me again. it fails after 3 times and here is what is in the apache log [Wed May 30 22:25:19 2007] [warn] [client 10.1.1.4] [2692] auth_ldap authenticate: user authentication failed; URI / [ldap_search_ext_s() for user failed][Filter Error] here is what the ldap server (Novell Netware 6.5sp6) see's: New cleartext connection 0x560b9c40 from 172.30.0.20:1998, monitor = 0x131, index = 2 DoBind on connection 0x560b9c40 Bind name:cn=admin,o=somewhere, version:3, authentication:simple Sending operation result 0:: to connection 0x560b9c40 Operation 0x1:0x60 on connection 0x560b9c40 completed in 0 seconds DoSearch on connection 0x560b9c40 Search request: base: o=somewhere scope:2 dereference:3 sizelimit:-1 timelimit:0 attrsonly:0 filter: ((objectclass=*)(cn=tonyg)) attribute: cn Sending search result entry cn=TonyG,o=somewhere to connection 0x560b9c40 Sending operation result 0:: to connection 0x560b9c40 Operation 0x2:0x63 on connection 0x560b9c40 completed in 0 seconds DoBind on connection 0x560b9c40 Bind name:cn=TonyG,o=somewhere, version:3, authentication:simple Sending operation result 0:: to connection 0x560b9c40 Operation 0x3:0x60 on connection 0x560b9c40 completed in 0 seconds *** Tony Guadagno Guadagno Consulting [EMAIL PROTECTED] 585.703.6700 *** BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 X-GWTYPE:USER FN:Tony Guadagno EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:[EMAIL PROTECTED] N:Guadagno;Tony END:VCARD - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Launching one more unwanted daemon
With Startservers 1 there will be two processes. A main process, and one child. IF this is what you are seeing there is nothing peculiar going on. I know there would be two process one root and other daemon.I am worried about the one more extra daemon which is getting launched. BTW, why is it that you don't want more than one process? My requirement is like that Thanks -A Krist On 6/4/07, Krist van Besien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/3/07, Arnab Ganguly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I am using apache2.2 with MPM model as Worker in Solaris 5.9 .I have the following configuration. StartServers 1 ServerLimit 1 MaxClient 128 MaxSpareThreads 128 MinSpareThreads 1 ThreadsPerChild 128 MaxRequestPerChild 0 My requirement is to handle all the request by single process and want this process to be active through out.Issue I get is that after Apache runs for a longer time, one new process is launched apart from the active process which was handling all the request. I am not sure as why this new process is getting launched although I kept ServerLimit and StartServers both as 1.Is the MaxRequestPerChild 0 is creating the problem, as due to overload one more process is getting launched or any particular module is responsible for the above?What to do to prevent this? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bremgarten b. Bern, Switzerland -- A: It reverses the normal flow of conversation. Q: What's wrong with top-posting? A: Top-posting. Q: What's the biggest scourge on plain text email discussions? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite and authentication
Joshua Slive wrote: On 6/4/07, Chris Tankersley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got a section of the website that I want only .htaccess authenticated users to be able to access, but I also want to push them to https://domain.name if they accidentally type in http://domain.name. If I throw both rules into my .htaccess I'm prompted to authenticate, then mod_rewrite fires, and then I have to authenticate again. Is there a way I can tell apache to do the mod_rewrite first, then authenticate? Apache 1.3.29 on OpenBSD 4.1 All bets are off when you use those old hacked-up openbsd apache versions. You're often better off asking on an openbsd list. But the first question to ask is: do you really need to use .htaccess? If at all possible, you should put your directives in httpd.conf. Then the problem is solved simply by putting the auth directives inside the SSL VirtualHost and the redirect inside the non-ssl VirtualHost. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yeah, I know, but it's what I have to work with. Moving the directives from .htaccess and splitting them into the right VirtualHost directives did the trick. Thanks! Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changeing the default web site
Krist van Besien wrote: On 6/4/07, David Segall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to add my personal web site as the default to a server that already has a default web site. The existing default web site is MythTV www.mythtv.org and I don't want to make any changes to it because I am frightened I will have to change the MythTV application. I'm a bit confused here. You are the webmaster of MythTV.org? And how do you expect a webserver to have two default sites? I'm sorry, I expressed that very badly. I am running the MythTV's MythWeb _application_. It provides web access to _my_ MythTV server. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Launching one more unwanted daemon
On 6/4/07, Arnab Ganguly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With Startservers 1 there will be two processes. A main process, and one child. IF this is what you are seeing there is nothing peculiar going on. I know there would be two process one root and other daemon.I am worried about the one more extra daemon which is getting launched. BTW, why is it that you don't want more than one process? My requirement is like that The less details you provide, the less help you're going to get. Another process that you may see with worker is the mod_cgid daemon process that is used to launch cgi scripts. Are you accounting for that? Have you used mod_status to see what the processes are doing? Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Launching one more unwanted daemon
Hi All, I am using apache2.2 with MPM model as Worker in Solaris 5.9 .I have the following configuration. StartServers 1 ServerLimit 1 MaxClient 128 MaxSpareThreads 128 MinSpareThreads 1 ThreadsPerChild 128 MaxRequestPerChild 0 My requirement is to handle all the request by single process and want this process to be active through out.Issue I get is that after Apache runs for a longer time, one new process is launched apart from the active process which was handling all the request. I am not sure as why this new process is getting launched although I kept ServerLimit and StartServers both as 1.Is the MaxRequestPerChild 0 is creating the problem, as due to overload one more process is getting launched or any particular module is responsible for the above?What to do to prevent this? I am not worried about the mod_cgid daemon.This process remains there from the begining.I am worried about the extra daemon ie is getting launched.Likealtogether there are 3 daemon process.1 for mod_cgi and 2 for the core apache although I have kept StartServers and ServerLimit both 1.Hope this is more clear. Any help would be appreciated.Thanks in advance. Regards -A On 6/4/07, Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/4/07, Arnab Ganguly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With Startservers 1 there will be two processes. A main process, and one child. IF this is what you are seeing there is nothing peculiar going on. I know there would be two process one root and other daemon.I am worried about the one more extra daemon which is getting launched. BTW, why is it that you don't want more than one process? My requirement is like that The less details you provide, the less help you're going to get. Another process that you may see with worker is the mod_cgid daemon process that is used to launch cgi scripts. Are you accounting for that? Have you used mod_status to see what the processes are doing? Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Launching one more unwanted daemon
On 6/4/07, Arnab Ganguly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I am using apache2.2 with MPM model as Worker in Solaris 5.9 .I have the following configuration. StartServers 1 ServerLimit 1 MaxClient 128 MaxSpareThreads 128 MinSpareThreads 1 ThreadsPerChild 128 MaxRequestPerChild 0 My requirement is to handle all the request by single process and want this process to be active through out.Issue I get is that after Apache runs for a longer time, one new process is launched apart from the active process which was handling all the request. I am not sure as why this new process is getting launched although I kept ServerLimit and StartServers both as 1.Is the MaxRequestPerChild 0 is creating the problem, as due to overload one more process is getting launched or any particular module is responsible for the above?What to do to prevent this? I am not worried about the mod_cgid daemon.This process remains there from the begining.I am worried about the extra daemon ie is getting launched.Like altogether there are 3 daemon process.1 for mod_cgi and 2 for the core apache although I have kept StartServers and ServerLimit both 1.Hope this is more clear. When I asked for more details, I was talking about your my requirement is like that response. Worker is not really designed to operate as a single process, so telling us WHY you have the requirement might allow someone to suggest another way of achieving the same thing. And again: have you used mod_status to track what the different processes are doing? Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] server-status - DOS Attack?
Hi, I'm getting a lot of these when running server-status. Is this some kind of DOS attack? *25-0* 52500/2/22 *R* 0.002 65 0.0 0.000.40 ? ? ..reading.. *26-0* 52510/0/20 *R* 0.083 46 0.0 0.007.44 ? ? ..reading.. *27-0* 50860/5/14 *R* 0.006 66 0.0 0.100.36 ? ? ..reading.. *28-0* 5087 0/5/15 *R* 0.00 11 1579 0.0 0.43 0.58 ? ? ..reading..
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Launching one more unwanted daemon
Arnab, You may wish to try launching httpd with the -X (debug mode) argument. That will limit it to a single process. Matt - Original Message - From: Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Monday, June 4, 2007 12:46:38 PM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Launching one more unwanted daemon On 6/4/07, Arnab Ganguly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I am using apache2.2 with MPM model as Worker in Solaris 5.9 .I have the following configuration. StartServers 1 ServerLimit 1 MaxClient 128 MaxSpareThreads 128 MinSpareThreads 1 ThreadsPerChild 128 MaxRequestPerChild 0 My requirement is to handle all the request by single process and want this process to be active through out.Issue I get is that after Apache runs for a longer time, one new process is launched apart from the active process which was handling all the request. I am not sure as why this new process is getting launched although I kept ServerLimit and StartServers both as 1.Is the MaxRequestPerChild 0 is creating the problem, as due to overload one more process is getting launched or any particular module is responsible for the above?What to do to prevent this? I am not worried about the mod_cgid daemon.This process remains there from the begining.I am worried about the extra daemon ie is getting launched.Like altogether there are 3 daemon process.1 for mod_cgi and 2 for the core apache although I have kept StartServers and ServerLimit both 1.Hope this is more clear. When I asked for more details, I was talking about your my requirement is like that response. Worker is not really designed to operate as a single process, so telling us WHY you have the requirement might allow someone to suggest another way of achieving the same thing. And again: have you used mod_status to track what the different processes are doing? Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse proxy not working properly
I am running apache server ver 2.0.59 on a Linux box on port 80. Here are my Reverse proxy lines... ProxyPass /test/ http://internal.com/mobi/ https://internal.com/mobi/ ProxyPassReverse /test/ http://internal.com/mobi/https://internal.com/mobi/ ProxyHTMLURLMap http://internal.com https://internal.com/ /test Location /test/* SetOutputFilter proxy-html ProxyHTMLURLMap / /test/ ProxyHTMLURLMap /test /test RequestHeaderunset Accept-Encoding /Location the problem is, dynamic links are not working (i.e., links are breaking) in HTML pages, where as hard links are working properly. Any help would be appriciated. Thanks, Sharath
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changeing the default web site
On 6/4/07, David Segall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Krist van Besien wrote: On 6/4/07, David Segall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to add my personal web site as the default to a server that already has a default web site. The existing default web site is MythTV www.mythtv.org and I don't want to make any changes to it because I am frightened I will have to change the MythTV application. I'm a bit confused here. You are the webmaster of MythTV.org? And how do you expect a webserver to have two default sites? I'm sorry, I expressed that very badly. I am running the MythTV's MythWeb _application_. It provides web access to _my_ MythTV server. Ok. If what you want is serving www.example.com and mythtv.example.com from the same apache server than what you need is to read everything about virtual hosting. http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/ Krist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bremgarten b. Bern, Switzerland -- A: It reverses the normal flow of conversation. Q: What's wrong with top-posting? A: Top-posting. Q: What's the biggest scourge on plain text email discussions? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changeing the default web site
What distribution are you using? If you are using a debian based distro, I may be able to help, as I have set up exactly what you are looking to accomplish. But you still have to read about virtual hosts. :) I would like to add my personal web site as the default to a server that already has a default web site. The existing default web site is MythTV www.mythtv.org and I don't want to make any changes to it because I am frightened I will have to change the MythTV application. -- Glen Barber signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changeing the default web site
I set up the machine using Mythdora 3.2 which uses Fedora Core 5. Glen Barber wrote: What distribution are you using? If you are using a debian based distro, I may be able to help, as I have set up exactly what you are looking to accomplish. But you still have to read about virtual hosts. :) I would like to add my personal web site as the default to a server that already has a default web site. The existing default web site is MythTV www.mythtv.org and I don't want to make any changes to it because I am frightened I will have to change the MythTV application. -- David Segall Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Profectus Pty LtdPhone: +61 3 9830 5026 1 Myrtle RoadMobile: +61 4 1756 7246 Canterbury, VIC, 3126 Australia Fax:+61 3 9830 0959 - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Launching one more unwanted daemon
Hi, I am replacing Apache with NES(Sun Web Server).NES is pretty old.So I wanted to use Apache with single process and multi threaded web server similar to NES. Now I have used the mod_status also.The new process launched shows to be active while the old daemon doesn't show anything. Thanks -A On 6/4/07, Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/4/07, Arnab Ganguly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I am using apache2.2 with MPM model as Worker in Solaris 5.9 .I have the following configuration. StartServers 1 ServerLimit 1 MaxClient 128 MaxSpareThreads 128 MinSpareThreads 1 ThreadsPerChild 128 MaxRequestPerChild 0 My requirement is to handle all the request by single process and want this process to be active through out.Issue I get is that after Apache runs for a longer time, one new process is launched apart from the active process which was handling all the request. I am not sure as why this new process is getting launched although I kept ServerLimit and StartServers both as 1.Is the MaxRequestPerChild 0 is creating the problem, as due to overload one more process is getting launched or any particular module is responsible for the above?What to do to prevent this? I am not worried about the mod_cgid daemon.This process remains there from the begining.I am worried about the extra daemon ie is getting launched.Like altogether there are 3 daemon process.1 for mod_cgi and 2 for the core apache although I have kept StartServers and ServerLimit both 1.Hopethis is more clear. When I asked for more details, I was talking about your my requirement is like that response. Worker is not really designed to operate as a single process, so telling us WHY you have the requirement might allow someone to suggest another way of achieving the same thing. And again: have you used mod_status to track what the different processes are doing? Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
