[users@httpd] Difference between mod_jk and mod_proxy
Dear We can do loadbalancing using both mod_jk and mod_proxy. what is the difference between them. Regards
Re: [users@httpd] Difference between mod_jk and mod_proxy
Dne 27.1.2011 09:50, Jehan Badshah napsal(a): Dear We can do loadbalancing using both mod_jk and mod_proxy. what is the difference between them. Hi Jehan, it is a FAQ: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Connectors#Q2 In my experience, the only difference is the ability of mod_jk to pass the SSL_* environment variables using the JkEnv directive, mod_proxy_ajp cannot do this. I have written my conclusions to http://opencms-wiki.org/MultiSite_configuration_instructions_%28apache_%2B_mod_jk%29#mod_jk_or_mod_proxy_ajp_.3F so please read it there. Cheers Martin -- ~~ Supercomputing Center Brno Martin Kuba Institute of Computer Scienceemail: ma...@ics.muni.cz Masaryk University http://www.ics.muni.cz/~makub/ Botanicka 68a, 60200 Brno, CZ mobil: +420-603-533775 -- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [users@httpd] Difference between mod_jk and mod_proxy
Thanks Martin. On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Martin Kuba ma...@ics.muni.cz wrote: Dne 27.1.2011 09:50, Jehan Badshah napsal(a): Dear We can do loadbalancing using both mod_jk and mod_proxy. what is the difference between them. Hi Jehan, it is a FAQ: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Connectors#Q2 In my experience, the only difference is the ability of mod_jk to pass the SSL_* environment variables using the JkEnv directive, mod_proxy_ajp cannot do this. I have written my conclusions to http://opencms-wiki.org/MultiSite_configuration_instructions_%28apache_%2B_mod_jk%29#mod_jk_or_mod_proxy_ajp_.3F so please read it there. Cheers Martin -- ~~ Supercomputing Center Brno Martin Kuba Institute of Computer Scienceemail: ma...@ics.muni.cz Masaryk University http://www.ics.muni.cz/~makub/ Botanicka 68a, 60200 Brno, CZ mobil: +420-603-533775 -- -- Regards Jehan Badshah | Software Engineer MS (Computer Science) FAST - National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences A.K. Brohi Road, H-11/4, Islamabad UAN: +92 (0)51 - 111 128 128 ext 263 Cell: 0300-5847471
Re: [users@httpd] Difference between mod_jk and mod_proxy
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Martin Kuba ma...@ics.muni.cz wrote: Hi Jehan, it is a FAQ: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Connectors#Q2 In my experience, the only difference is the ability of mod_jk to pass the SSL_* environment variables using the JkEnv directive, mod_proxy_ajp cannot do this. I have written my conclusions to http://opencms-wiki.org/MultiSite_configuration_instructions_%28apache_%2B_mod_jk%29#mod_jk_or_mod_proxy_ajp_.3F so please read it there. Excellent question! Excellent links! Thank you. Best Zeno - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
[users@httpd] problem in Loadbalancing using mod_jk (configuration of worker.properties attached)
Dear all Following is the configuration of *worker.properties* file, using that configuration my browser (or apache) goes in endless loop. please help. - *worker.properties* worker.list=loadbalancer,status # Define Node1 worker.node1.port=8009 worker.node1.host=172.16.100.122 worker.node1.type=ajp13 *worker.node1.lbfactor=1* worker.node1.socket_timeout=100 worker.node1.local_worker=*0* # Define Node2 worker.node2.port=8009 worker.node2.host=172.16.100.121 worker.node2.type=ajp13 *worker.node2.lbfactor=1* worker.node2.socket_timeout=100 worker.node2.local_worker=*0* # Define Node3 worker.node3.port=8009 worker.node3.host=localhost worker.node3.type=ajp13 *worker.node3.lbfactor=1* worker.node3.socket_timeout=100 worker.node3.local_worker=*0* # Status worker for managing load balancer worker.status.type=status # Load-balancing behaviour worker.loadbalancer.type=lb worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=node1,node2,node3 worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=1 *worker.loadbalancer.local_worker_only=1* --- end --- Regards Jehan Badshah | Software Engineer MS (Computer Science) FAST - National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences A.K. Brohi Road, H-11/4, Islamabad UAN: +92 (0)51 - 111 128 128 ext 263 Cell: 0300-5847471
[users@httpd] problem in Loadbalancing using mod_jk (configuration of worker.properties attached)
Dear all Following is the configuration of *worker.properties* file, using that configuration my browser (or apache) goes in endless loop. please help. - *worker.properties* worker.list=loadbalancer,status # Define Node1 worker.node1.port=8009 worker.node1.host=172.16.100.122 worker.node1.type=ajp13 *worker.node1.lbfactor=1* worker.node1.socket_timeout=100 worker.node1.local_worker=*1* # Define Node2 worker.node2.port=8009 worker.node2.host=172.16.100.121 worker.node2.type=ajp13 *worker.node2.lbfactor=1* worker.node2.socket_timeout=100 worker.node2.local_worker=*1* # Define Node3 worker.node3.port=8009 worker.node3.host=localhost worker.node3.type=ajp13 *worker.node3.lbfactor=1* worker.node3.socket_timeout=100 worker.node3.local_worker=*1* # Status worker for managing load balancer worker.status.type=status # Load-balancing behaviour worker.loadbalancer.type=lb worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=node1,node2,node3 worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=1 *worker.loadbalancer.local_worker_only=1* --- end --- Regards Jehan Badshah | Software Engineer MS (Computer Science) FAST - National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences A.K. Brohi Road, H-11/4, Islamabad UAN: +92 (0)51 - 111 128 128 ext 263 Cell: 0300-5847471
[users@httpd] Re: experiencing Out of memory errors
Hi Am 27.01.2011 um 12:57 schrieb Michiel Beijen michiel.bei...@otrs.com: Hi John, On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 10:17 -0500, John Deighan wrote: However, we're also not sure if either of these are needed to escape the 2 GB memory limitation. E.g., can 64 bit Perl be used with a 32 bit Apache and/or mod_perl? You should use the same architecture for Perl and Apache. Any help with accomplishing what we need would be greatly appreciated, including the possibility of hiring someone on a contract basis to help us. Probably because of the fact that the Apache foundation does not ship 64-bit builds for Windows (which is a shame!), ActiveState does not ship a mod_perl with their 64- bit Perl. Compiling your own mod_perl would be possible but you need to use preferably the same compiler that was used for Apache + perl. If you would want to switch to StrawberryPerl 5.12.x 64-bit, you can use this pre-compiled mod_perl: http://strawberryperl.com/package/kmx/mod_perl/ Is mod_perl compiled with MinGW or with cl.exe for windows? Seems that apxs suggest MinGW. I got the same problem with mod_ruby for windows. Best Zeno - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
[users@httpd] Reverse proxy with digest auth to a webapp with basic auth
Hello everyone We are using apache's mod_proxy (reverse proxy) to make two internal webapps available over the internet. It works fine so far. We now tried to use digest authentication on the proxy to secure the access to the proxy itself. One webapp has no problem with that approach. You first have to enter the username and passwort of the digest auth of the proxy and then you can access the webapp and login there as usual. The other application though is using basic auth - which does not work. You first have to enter the username and passwort of the proxy - good. Then you have to enter the username and password of the app. Now the browser falls into an infinte loop, where it sends always just the authentication of the proxy digest auth and gets back a 401 from the webapp behind the proxy, because this one does not expect the digest auth, but the basic auth. Is there any pattern how digest and/or basic auth can be used for the reverse proxy itself and for the proxied webapp? Best regards, James - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
[users@httpd] Re: experiencing Out of memory errors
I'd forgotten about Strawberry Perl (came across it about a year ago, but never got around to trying it). One question, though: I'm thinking there's not much point to using a 64-bit version of mod_perl unless I'm using it with a 64-bit version of Apache. Where can I get a 64-bit version of Apache that will with with the mod_perl below? On 1/27/2011 6:57 AM, Michiel Beijen wrote: Hi John, ... etc. If you would want to switch to StrawberryPerl 5.12.x 64-bit, you can use this pre-compiled mod_perl: http://strawberryperl.com/package/kmx/mod_perl/ -- Mike - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Status 3221225480 and restart
On 24.01.11 11:09, wolfgang.mi...@geigerus.com wrote: In-Reply-To: E71BAE31C16E784380444F62AFD383C306F6141AB9@EMV02-UKBR.domain1.systemhos t.net References: E71BAE31C16E784380444F62AFD383C304FF0B38AD@EMV02-UKBR.domain1.systemhos t.net AANLkTi=f+2tn2ecae2fq8zvrs6r0pp1whim1-pjsj...@mail.gmail.com E71BAE31C16E784380444F62AFD383C306F6141AB9@EMV02-UKBR.domain1.systemhos t.net To: users@httpd.apache.org From: wolfgang.mi...@geigerus.com Subject: [users@httpd] Status 3221225480 and restart Hi All, I am running Apache 2.2.17 on a Windows XP and repeatedly I get the following message: [notice] Parent: child process exited with status 3221225480 -- Restarting. And Apache restarts. What does status 3221225480 mean? Is this somehow related to the SSL problem you were replying to? If not, please stop hijacking threads - send a new mail, not a reply. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. LSD will make your ECS screen display 16.7 million colors - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance
On 22.01.11 00:53, john.3.new...@bt.com wrote: We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform (T2000) to an x86/64 platform (x2270-m2) and we have noticed an erratic response time for downloads of files using SSL. This seems to randomly occur with any files about 10k or larger. For instance, I have been using a test file of 140K, and it can take 0.5 or 4.8 seconds to transfer. When using the sparc platform, it always only takes 0.5 seconds. I noticed this as we are using an external monitoring system (Gomez.com) and we started seeing these wildly varying times for transaction processing. I have tried a cut down SSL setup for testing, and examined every directive and option, and I can't make sense of the problem. I'm using the following configuration string, and I'd be happy to include the configuration setups.. I can move the bare-bones configuration between the sparc and x86 platforms and get normal response on the sparc, and irregular on the x86. random device can make a huge difference. What do you use for random data? /dev/random or /dev/urandom? If the rofmer, try the latter if it helps. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Windows found: (R)emove, (E)rase, (D)elete - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
RE: [users@httpd] problem in Loadbalancing using mod_jk (configuration of worker.properties attached)
To my unexperienced eye you need node1, node2 and node3 in your worker.list property as well as the loadbalance and status workers. Hth, Lukas __ Lukas Sklenar From: Jehan Badshah [mailto:jehan.bads...@nu.edu.pk] Sent: 27 January 2011 09:51 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [users@httpd] problem in Loadbalancing using mod_jk (configuration of worker.properties attached) Dear all Following is the configuration of worker.properties file, using that configuration my browser (or apache) goes in endless loop. please help. - worker.properties worker.list=loadbalancer,status # Define Node1 worker.node1.port=8009 worker.node1.host=172.16.100.122 worker.node1.type=ajp13 worker.node1.lbfactor=1 worker.node1.socket_timeout=100 worker.node1.local_worker=1 # Define Node2 worker.node2.port=8009 worker.node2.host=172.16.100.121 worker.node2.type=ajp13 worker.node2.lbfactor=1 worker.node2.socket_timeout=100 worker.node2.local_worker=1 # Define Node3 worker.node3.port=8009 worker.node3.host=localhost worker.node3.type=ajp13 worker.node3.lbfactor=1 worker.node3.socket_timeout=100 worker.node3.local_worker=1 # Status worker for managing load balancer worker.status.type=status # Load-balancing behaviour worker.loadbalancer.type=lb worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=node1,node2,node3 worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=1 worker.loadbalancer.local_worker_only=1 --- end --- Regards Jehan Badshah | Software Engineer MS (Computer Science) FAST - National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences A.K. Brohi Road, H-11/4, Islamabad UAN: +92 (0)51 - 111 128 128 ext 263 Cell: 0300-5847471 Please consider the environment before printing this email. This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately. Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy by an authorised signatory. The contents of this email may relate to dealings with other companies within the Detica Limited group of companies. Detica Limited is registered in England under No: 1337451. Registered offices: Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YP, England.
Re: [users@httpd] Status 3221225480 and restart
Sorry! Did not mean to! Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk 01/27/2011 10:32 AM Please respond to users@httpd.apache.org To users@httpd.apache.org cc Subject Re: [users@httpd] Status 3221225480 and restart On 24.01.11 11:09, wolfgang.mi...@geigerus.com wrote: In-Reply-To: E71BAE31C16E784380444F62AFD383C306F6141AB9@EMV02-UKBR.domain1.systemhos t.net References: E71BAE31C16E784380444F62AFD383C304FF0B38AD@EMV02-UKBR.domain1.systemhos t.net AANLkTi=f+2tn2ecae2fq8zvrs6r0pp1whim1-pjsj...@mail.gmail.com E71BAE31C16E784380444F62AFD383C306F6141AB9@EMV02-UKBR.domain1.systemhos t.net To: users@httpd.apache.org From: wolfgang.mi...@geigerus.com Subject: [users@httpd] Status 3221225480 and restart Hi All, I am running Apache 2.2.17 on a Windows XP and repeatedly I get the following message: [notice] Parent: child process exited with status 3221225480 -- Restarting. And Apache restarts. What does status 3221225480 mean? Is this somehow related to the SSL problem you were replying to? If not, please stop hijacking threads - send a new mail, not a reply. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. LSD will make your ECS screen display 16.7 million colors - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance
Am 27.01.2011 16:34, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 22.01.11 00:53, john.3.new...@bt.com wrote: We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform (T2000) to an x86/64 platform (x2270-m2) and we have noticed an erratic response time for downloads of files using SSL. This seems to randomly occur with any files about 10k or larger. For instance, I have been using a test file of 140K, and it can take 0.5 or 4.8 seconds to transfer. When using the sparc platform, it always only takes 0.5 seconds. I noticed this as we are using an external monitoring system (Gomez.com) and we started seeing these wildly varying times for transaction processing. I have tried a cut down SSL setup for testing, and examined every directive and option, and I can't make sense of the problem. I'm using the following configuration string, and I'd be happy to include the configuration setups.. I can move the bare-bones configuration between the sparc and x86 platforms and get normal response on the sparc, and irregular on the x86. random device can make a huge difference. What do you use for random data? /dev/random or /dev/urandom? If the rofmer, try the latter if it helps. Good point. But to have some prove at hand, don't change the random device yet - instead monitor /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail with e.g. watch. If your're going of of random bytes - ka-ching :) Regards, Edgar - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
[users@httpd] how is SSLRequireSSL merged?
Hi... (Yes I've read the documentation section about merging sections, but IMHO it's not absolutely clear IMHO) I have one vhost containing about: ... Location / SSLRequireSSL /Location ... and possibly also a later location-section on /, containing other directives, e.g. Location / #do e.g. some proxy stuff /Location (and yes it's unfortunately required to have two separate sections) Is the SSLRequireSSL still active, after the merging? I now it says later sections override earlier ones... but what exactly does override mean here,.. completely or just those directives which are defined in the later section? Or in more general words, having: Location / directiveA value1 directiveB value1 /Location Location / directiveB value2 directiveC value2 /Location Will the merged result be like: Location / directiveA value1 directiveB value2 directiveC value2 /Location or just Location / directiveB value2 directiveC value2 /Location I used to thought it's always (except for +/- directives like Options or so) like the former of the two ways, but it seems to be not always like that, at least with Order/Deny/Allow. Thanks, Chris. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [users@httpd] how is SSLRequireSSL merged?
On Jan 27, 2011, at 7:45 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: Hi... (Yes I've read the documentation section about merging sections, but IMHO it's not absolutely clear IMHO) I have one vhost containing about: ... Location / SSLRequireSSL /Location ... and possibly also a later location-section on /, containing other directives, e.g. Location / #do e.g. some proxy stuff /Location (and yes it's unfortunately required to have two separate sections) Is the SSLRequireSSL still active, after the merging? Yes I now it says later sections override earlier ones... but what exactly does override mean here,.. completely or just those directives which are defined in the later section? Directive A in a later scope overrides Directive A in the earlier one. Directive A in the later scope does not affect Directive B in the earlier. -- Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
[users@httpd] mod_ssl and virtual host
Apache version 2.2.3 CentOS Linux 5.5 /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.config changes #VirtualHost _default_:443 VirtualHost free-man.net:443 #SSLCertificateFile /etc/pki/tls/certs/localhost.crt SSLCertificateFile /etc/pki/tls/certs/free-man-net.crt #SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/pki/tls/private/localhost.key SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/pki/tls/private/free-mman-net.key this works I get no errors on my https free-man.net. /etc/httpd/conf/conf.config VirtualHost www.specialtymarket.com:443 SSLEngine on SSLProtocol all -SSLv2 SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT:!SSLv2:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW SSLCertificateFile /etc/pki_free-man_net/myCA/certs/specialtymarketCA.crt SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/pki_free-man_net/myCA/private/specialtymarketCA.key when I restart httpd I get Starting httpd: Apache/2.2.3 mod_ssl/2.2.3 (Pass Phrase Dialog) Some of your private key files are encrypted for security reasons. In order to read them you have to provide the pass phrases. Server specialtymarket.com:443 (RSA) Enter pass phrase: OK: Pass Phrase Dialog successful. when I do a https for specialtymarket.com in a browser I get www.specialtymarket.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed. The certificate is only valid for free-man.net what am I doing wrong? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
[users@httpd] mod_dir with HTTPS
Hello. It seems that mod_dir does not work properly with SSL (https). When working with http, there is no problem: If url http://www.abc.com/test; is requested, apache appends a / to the url and then respones to browser with code 301, telling it to request the newly-modified url http://www.abc.com/test/;. However, with https, things are not going as expected: If url https://www.abc.com/test; is requested, the new url responsed by apache is http://www.abc.com/test/;, but not https://...;, resulting in browser's page load error. Any suggestion or solution, please?
[users@httpd] problem in Loadbalancing using mod_jk (configuration of worker.properties attached)
Dear all Following is the configuration of *worker.properties* file, using that configuration my browser (or apache) goes in endless loop. please help. - *worker.properties* worker.list=loadbalancer,status # Define Node1 worker.node1.port=8009 worker.node1.host=172.16.100.122 worker.node1.type=ajp13 *worker.node1.lbfactor=1* worker.node1.socket_timeout=100 worker.node1.local_worker=*1* # Define Node2 worker.node2.port=8009 worker.node2.host=172.16.100.121 worker.node2.type=ajp13 *worker.node2.lbfactor=1* worker.node2.socket_timeout=100 worker.node2.local_worker=*1* # Define Node3 worker.node3.port=8009 worker.node3.host=localhost worker.node3.type=ajp13 *worker.node3.lbfactor=1* worker.node3.socket_timeout=100 worker.node3.local_worker=*1* # Status worker for managing load balancer worker.status.type=status # Load-balancing behaviour worker.loadbalancer.type=lb worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=node1,node2,node3 worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=1 *worker.loadbalancer.local_worker_only=1* --- end --- Regards Jehan Badshah | Software Engineer MS (Computer Science) FAST - National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences A.K. Brohi Road, H-11/4, Islamabad UAN: +92 (0)51 - 111 128 128 ext 263 Cell: 0300-5847471
Re: [users@httpd] problem in Loadbalancing using mod_jk (configuration of worker.properties attached)
Did you configure the Tomcats though? Make sure that jvmRoute attribute is set at your Engine so for the first one you need to have Engine name=Catalina jvmRoute=node1 for second one Engine name=Catalina jvmRoute=node2 etc. On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Jehan Badshah jehan.bads...@nu.edu.pkwrote: Dear all Following is the configuration of *worker.properties* file, using that configuration my browser (or apache) goes in endless loop. please help. - *worker.properties* worker.list=loadbalancer,status # Define Node1 worker.node1.port=8009 worker.node1.host=172.16.100.122 worker.node1.type=ajp13 *worker.node1.lbfactor=1* worker.node1.socket_timeout=100 worker.node1.local_worker=*1* # Define Node2 worker.node2.port=8009 worker.node2.host=172.16.100.121 worker.node2.type=ajp13 *worker.node2.lbfactor=1* worker.node2.socket_timeout=100 worker.node2.local_worker=*1* # Define Node3 worker.node3.port=8009 worker.node3.host=localhost worker.node3.type=ajp13 *worker.node3.lbfactor=1* worker.node3.socket_timeout=100 worker.node3.local_worker=*1* # Status worker for managing load balancer worker.status.type=status # Load-balancing behaviour worker.loadbalancer.type=lb worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=node1,node2,node3 worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=1 *worker.loadbalancer.local_worker_only=1* --- end --- Regards Jehan Badshah | Software Engineer MS (Computer Science) FAST - National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences A.K. Brohi Road, H-11/4, Islamabad UAN: +92 (0)51 - 111 128 128 ext 263 Cell: 0300-5847471
Re: [users@httpd] problem in Loadbalancing using mod_jk (configuration of worker.properties attached)
Yes! to tomcat/conf/server.xml I have already added Engine name=*Catalina* defaultHost=*localhost* jvmRoute=*node1* to 172.16.100.122 Engine name=*Catalina* defaultHost=*localhost* jvmRoute=*node2* to 172.16.100.121 Engine name=*Catalina* defaultHost=*localhost* jvmRoute=*node3* to localhost On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Igor Cicimov icici...@gmail.com wrote: Did you configure the Tomcats though? Make sure that jvmRoute attribute is set at your Engine so for the first one you need to have Engine name=Catalina jvmRoute=node1 for second one Engine name=Catalina jvmRoute=node2 etc. On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Jehan Badshah jehan.bads...@nu.edu.pkwrote: Dear all Following is the configuration of *worker.properties* file, using that configuration my browser (or apache) goes in endless loop. please help. - *worker.properties* worker.list=loadbalancer,status # Define Node1 worker.node1.port=8009 worker.node1.host=172.16.100.122 worker.node1.type=ajp13 *worker.node1.lbfactor=1* worker.node1.socket_timeout=100 worker.node1.local_worker=*1* # Define Node2 worker.node2.port=8009 worker.node2.host=172.16.100.121 worker.node2.type=ajp13 *worker.node2.lbfactor=1* worker.node2.socket_timeout=100 worker.node2.local_worker=*1* # Define Node3 worker.node3.port=8009 worker.node3.host=localhost worker.node3.type=ajp13 *worker.node3.lbfactor=1* worker.node3.socket_timeout=100 worker.node3.local_worker=*1* # Status worker for managing load balancer worker.status.type=status # Load-balancing behaviour worker.loadbalancer.type=lb worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=node1,node2,node3 worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=1 *worker.loadbalancer.local_worker_only=1* --- end --- Regards Jehan Badshah | Software Engineer MS (Computer Science) FAST - National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences A.K. Brohi Road, H-11/4, Islamabad UAN: +92 (0)51 - 111 128 128 ext 263 Cell: 0300-5847471 -- Regards Jehan Badshah | Software Engineer MS (Computer Science) FAST - National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences A.K. Brohi Road, H-11/4, Islamabad UAN: +92 (0)51 - 111 128 128 ext 263 Cell: 0300-5847471
Re: [users@httpd] problem in Loadbalancing using mod_jk (configuration of worker.properties attached)
Whats the URI that is not working? What is your jk_module configuration in the httpd.conf file? Do you have the appropriate JkMount statements in it? Post it here please the code between these two IfModule jk_module /IfModule On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Jehan Badshah jehan.bads...@nu.edu.pkwrote: Yes! to tomcat/conf/server.xml I have already added Engine name=*Catalina* defaultHost=*localhost* jvmRoute=*node1* to 172.16.100.122 Engine name=*Catalina* defaultHost=*localhost* jvmRoute=*node2* to 172.16.100.121 Engine name=*Catalina* defaultHost=*localhost* jvmRoute=*node3* to localhost On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Igor Cicimov icici...@gmail.com wrote: Did you configure the Tomcats though? Make sure that jvmRoute attribute is set at your Engine so for the first one you need to have Engine name=Catalina jvmRoute=node1 for second one Engine name=Catalina jvmRoute=node2 etc. On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Jehan Badshah jehan.bads...@nu.edu.pkwrote: Dear all Following is the configuration of *worker.properties* file, using that configuration my browser (or apache) goes in endless loop. please help. - *worker.properties* worker.list=loadbalancer,status # Define Node1 worker.node1.port=8009 worker.node1.host=172.16.100.122 worker.node1.type=ajp13 *worker.node1.lbfactor=1* worker.node1.socket_timeout=100 worker.node1.local_worker=*1* # Define Node2 worker.node2.port=8009 worker.node2.host=172.16.100.121 worker.node2.type=ajp13 *worker.node2.lbfactor=1* worker.node2.socket_timeout=100 worker.node2.local_worker=*1* # Define Node3 worker.node3.port=8009 worker.node3.host=localhost worker.node3.type=ajp13 *worker.node3.lbfactor=1* worker.node3.socket_timeout=100 worker.node3.local_worker=*1* # Status worker for managing load balancer worker.status.type=status # Load-balancing behaviour worker.loadbalancer.type=lb worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=node1,node2,node3 worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=1 *worker.loadbalancer.local_worker_only=1* --- end --- Regards Jehan Badshah | Software Engineer MS (Computer Science) FAST - National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences A.K. Brohi Road, H-11/4, Islamabad UAN: +92 (0)51 - 111 128 128 ext 263 Cell: 0300-5847471 -- Regards Jehan Badshah | Software Engineer MS (Computer Science) FAST - National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences A.K. Brohi Road, H-11/4, Islamabad UAN: +92 (0)51 - 111 128 128 ext 263 Cell: 0300-5847471
Re: [users@httpd] mod_ssl and virtual host
Dne 28.1.2011 02:51, bf...@free-man.net napsal(a): The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed. The certificate is only valid for free-man.net what am I doing wrong? You can not use name-based virtual hosts for SSL if your Apache is older than 2.2.12 or your OpenSSL does not support SNI or the client is MSIE on Windows XP. In other words, you need a separate IP address for each SSL certificate, because the SSL connection is established before the HTTP connection takes place and the server does not know which certificate to choose. See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/ssl/ssl_faq.html#vhosts http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication Use IP-based virtual hosts instead. Cheers Martin -- ~~ Supercomputing Center Brno Martin Kuba Institute of Computer Scienceemail: ma...@ics.muni.cz Masaryk University http://www.ics.muni.cz/~makub/ Botanicka 68a, 60200 Brno, CZ mobil: +420-603-533775 -- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
