Re: Release vote : 3.2.0

2017-02-02 Thread A. Soroka 
I think Andy has the right story here (I must have copied it from someone using 
Linux). In fact, I did the release candidate on a Mac, a fact which will be 
reflected in my forthcoming vote.

---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library

> On Feb 2, 2017, at 5:40 AM, Andy Seaborne  wrote:
> 
> The Apache Jenkins installation has Linux slaves.
> 
> There are problems with Windows - there are general problems with temp files 
> getting left around and Jena uses a lot of temp space so it was not playing 
> nice with other jobs on those machines.
> 
> There aren't any Mac slaves.
> 
> But Java is portable, right? :-)
> 
> I think the text was copied from a vote call from someone who ran on Linux, 
> so that test was implicitly done already.
> 
>Andy
> 
> On 01/02/17 21:27, Dick Murray wrote:
>> ;-) Nothing implied from me and as I thought re Linux/Dev. Thanks (devs)
>> for the work.
>> 
>> On 1 Feb 2017 19:33, "A. Soroka"  wrote:
>> 
>>> No, I should say that that exclusion is just a nod to the fact that so
>>> many of the Jena devs use Linux that it's just much less of an issue to
>>> find Linux testers. Windows seems to be generally the hardest platform to
>>> get results for. I certainly didn't intend any more than that, but I copied
>>> that list from earlier release vote announcements. (!)
>>> 
>>> But maybe I am missing some history?
>>> 
>>> ajs6f
>>> 
 On Feb 1, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Dick Murray  wrote:
 
 Hi.
 
 Under checking Windows and Mac OS's are listed but not Linux. Is Jena
 assumed to pass? I'mean running Jena 3.2 snapshot on Ubuntu 16.04 and
 Centos 7.
 
 If you haven't broken anything in the snapshot then I vote release. ;-)
 
 On 1 Feb 2017 16:09, "A. Soroka"  wrote:
 
> Hello, Jena-folks!
> 
> Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
> 
> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's
> from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but
> _needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an
> issue, you can bet I will investigate fast.
> 
> This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2.
> 
> Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database
> gear, and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL
> servers).
> 
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/
> 
> Proposed distributions:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
> 
> Keys:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
> 
> Git tag:
> jena-3.2.0-rc1
> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=
> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
> 
> 
> Please vote to approve this release:
> 
>   [ ] +1 Approve the release
>   [ ]  0 Don't care
>   [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> 
> This vote will be open to the end of
> 
>  Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
> 
> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
> 
> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
> 
> 
> Checking needed:
> 
> • Does everything work on MS Windows?
> • Does everything work on OS X?
> • Is the GPG signature okay?
> • Is there a source archive?
> • Can the source archive really be built?
> • Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both
>>> source
> and binary artifacts)?
> • Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> • Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>

Re: Release vote : 3.2.0

2017-02-02 Thread Andy Seaborne 

The Apache Jenkins installation has Linux slaves.

There are problems with Windows - there are general problems with temp 
files getting left around and Jena uses a lot of temp space so it was 
not playing nice with other jobs on those machines.


There aren't any Mac slaves.

But Java is portable, right? :-)

I think the text was copied from a vote call from someone who ran on 
Linux, so that test was implicitly done already.


Andy

On 01/02/17 21:27, Dick Murray wrote:

;-) Nothing implied from me and as I thought re Linux/Dev. Thanks (devs)
for the work.

On 1 Feb 2017 19:33, "A. Soroka"  wrote:


No, I should say that that exclusion is just a nod to the fact that so
many of the Jena devs use Linux that it's just much less of an issue to
find Linux testers. Windows seems to be generally the hardest platform to
get results for. I certainly didn't intend any more than that, but I copied
that list from earlier release vote announcements. (!)

But maybe I am missing some history?

ajs6f


On Feb 1, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Dick Murray  wrote:

Hi.

Under checking Windows and Mac OS's are listed but not Linux. Is Jena
assumed to pass? I'mean running Jena 3.2 snapshot on Ubuntu 16.04 and
Centos 7.

If you haven't broken anything in the snapshot then I vote release. ;-)

On 1 Feb 2017 16:09, "A. Soroka"  wrote:


Hello, Jena-folks!

Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.

Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's
from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but
_needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an
issue, you can bet I will investigate fast.

This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2.

Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database
gear, and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL
servers).

Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/

Proposed distributions:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/

Keys:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS

Git tag:
jena-3.2.0-rc1
4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=
4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c


Please vote to approve this release:

   [ ] +1 Approve the release
   [ ]  0 Don't care
   [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...

This vote will be open to the end of

  Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC

Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!

 ajs6f (A. Soroka)


Checking needed:

• Does everything work on MS Windows?
• Does everything work on OS X?
• Is the GPG signature okay?
• Is there a source archive?
• Can the source archive really be built?
• Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both

source

and binary artifacts)?
• Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
• Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?

Re: Release vote : 3.2.0

2017-02-02 Thread Lorenz B. 
Hello,

do we have any release notes so far or is it just the JIRA [1].
Otherwise, maybe some pointers to things that are really new and how to
use them would be interesting for users like me.
So far, I filtered by "new feature" and "improvement" [2], yet some kind
of documentation would be nice. For me the most interesting parts are
probably the RDFConnection and the resultset-autoclosable util.



[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1283?jql=project%20%3D%20JENA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Jena%203.2.0%22
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1281?jql=project%20%3D%20JENA%20AND%20issuetype%20in%20(Improvement%2C%20%22New%20Feature%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Jena%203.2.0%22

 


Cheers,
Lorenz

> Hello, Jena-folks! 
>
> Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
>
> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's from 
> PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but _needed_ 
> to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an issue, you can 
> bet I will investigate fast.
>
> This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2. 
>
> Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database gear, 
> and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL servers).
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/
>
> Proposed distributions:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
>
> Keys:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>
> Git tag:
> jena-3.2.0-rc1
> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ]  0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> This vote will be open to the end of
>
>Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>
> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>
>   ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>
>
> Checking needed:
>
> • Does everything work on MS Windows?
> • Does everything work on OS X?
> • Is the GPG signature okay?
> • Is there a source archive?
> • Can the source archive really be built?
> • Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source 
> and binary artifacts)?
> • Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> • Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- 
Lorenz Bühmann
AKSW group, University of Leipzig
Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center

Re: Release vote : 3.2.0

2017-02-01 Thread Dick Murray 
;-) Nothing implied from me and as I thought re Linux/Dev. Thanks (devs)
for the work.

On 1 Feb 2017 19:33, "A. Soroka"  wrote:

> No, I should say that that exclusion is just a nod to the fact that so
> many of the Jena devs use Linux that it's just much less of an issue to
> find Linux testers. Windows seems to be generally the hardest platform to
> get results for. I certainly didn't intend any more than that, but I copied
> that list from earlier release vote announcements. (!)
>
> But maybe I am missing some history?
>
> ajs6f
>
> > On Feb 1, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Dick Murray  wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > Under checking Windows and Mac OS's are listed but not Linux. Is Jena
> > assumed to pass? I'mean running Jena 3.2 snapshot on Ubuntu 16.04 and
> > Centos 7.
> >
> > If you haven't broken anything in the snapshot then I vote release. ;-)
> >
> > On 1 Feb 2017 16:09, "A. Soroka"  wrote:
> >
> >> Hello, Jena-folks!
> >>
> >> Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
> >>
> >> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's
> >> from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but
> >> _needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an
> >> issue, you can bet I will investigate fast.
> >>
> >> This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2.
> >>
> >> Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database
> >> gear, and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL
> >> servers).
> >>
> >> Staging repository:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/
> >>
> >> Proposed distributions:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
> >>
> >> Keys:
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
> >>
> >> Git tag:
> >> jena-3.2.0-rc1
> >> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=
> >> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
> >>
> >>
> >> Please vote to approve this release:
> >>
> >>[ ] +1 Approve the release
> >>[ ]  0 Don't care
> >>[ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> >>
> >> This vote will be open to the end of
> >>
> >>   Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
> >>
> >> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
> >>
> >>  ajs6f (A. Soroka)
> >>
> >>
> >> Checking needed:
> >>
> >> • Does everything work on MS Windows?
> >> • Does everything work on OS X?
> >> • Is the GPG signature okay?
> >> • Is there a source archive?
> >> • Can the source archive really be built?
> >> • Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both
> source
> >> and binary artifacts)?
> >> • Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> >> • Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Re: Release vote : 3.2.0

2017-02-01 Thread A. Soroka 
No, I should say that that exclusion is just a nod to the fact that so many of 
the Jena devs use Linux that it's just much less of an issue to find Linux 
testers. Windows seems to be generally the hardest platform to get results for. 
I certainly didn't intend any more than that, but I copied that list from 
earlier release vote announcements. (!)

But maybe I am missing some history?

ajs6f 

> On Feb 1, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Dick Murray  wrote:
> 
> Hi.
> 
> Under checking Windows and Mac OS's are listed but not Linux. Is Jena
> assumed to pass? I'mean running Jena 3.2 snapshot on Ubuntu 16.04 and
> Centos 7.
> 
> If you haven't broken anything in the snapshot then I vote release. ;-)
> 
> On 1 Feb 2017 16:09, "A. Soroka"  wrote:
> 
>> Hello, Jena-folks!
>> 
>> Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
>> 
>> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's
>> from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but
>> _needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an
>> issue, you can bet I will investigate fast.
>> 
>> This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2.
>> 
>> Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database
>> gear, and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL
>> servers).
>> 
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/
>> 
>> Proposed distributions:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
>> 
>> Keys:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>> 
>> Git tag:
>> jena-3.2.0-rc1
>> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=
>> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>> 
>> 
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>> 
>>[ ] +1 Approve the release
>>[ ]  0 Don't care
>>[ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>> 
>> This vote will be open to the end of
>> 
>>   Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>> 
>> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>> 
>>  ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>> 
>> 
>> Checking needed:
>> 
>> • Does everything work on MS Windows?
>> • Does everything work on OS X?
>> • Is the GPG signature okay?
>> • Is there a source archive?
>> • Can the source archive really be built?
>> • Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source
>> and binary artifacts)?
>> • Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
>> • Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>

Re: Release vote : 3.2.0

2017-02-01 Thread Dick Murray 
Hi.

Under checking Windows and Mac OS's are listed but not Linux. Is Jena
assumed to pass? I'mean running Jena 3.2 snapshot on Ubuntu 16.04 and
Centos 7.

If you haven't broken anything in the snapshot then I vote release. ;-)

On 1 Feb 2017 16:09, "A. Soroka"  wrote:

> Hello, Jena-folks!
>
> Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
>
> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's
> from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but
> _needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an
> issue, you can bet I will investigate fast.
>
> This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2.
>
> Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database
> gear, and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL
> servers).
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/
>
> Proposed distributions:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
>
> Keys:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>
> Git tag:
> jena-3.2.0-rc1
> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=
> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ]  0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> This vote will be open to the end of
>
>Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>
> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>
>   ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>
>
> Checking needed:
>
> • Does everything work on MS Windows?
> • Does everything work on OS X?
> • Is the GPG signature okay?
> • Is there a source archive?
> • Can the source archive really be built?
> • Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source
> and binary artifacts)?
> • Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> • Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>
>
>
>
>