Re: Tunning up kannel
Hi Ahmed Have you tweaked the smsbox-max-pending and/or max-pending-requests? Check for them on the user guide On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Ahmed BOUDHRAA ahmed.boudh...@inbmi.edunet.tn wrote: Hi we are using kannel about 2 years in our institution and its woriking like a charm. we have high load traffic with 3 operators with 3 kannel gatways, our configuration is like this: - kannel 1 : Operator 1 : VM 2 x CPU 3 Ghz 8 Go Ram - kannel 2 : Operator 2 : VM 2 x CPU 3 Ghz 8 Go Ram - kannel 3 : Operator 3 : VM 2 x CPU 3 Ghz 8 Go Ram - Web Portal: for all kannel : VM 8 x CPU 3 Ghz 32 Go RAM - Postgres Database behind the web server : VM 8 x CPU 3 Ghz 32 Go RAM All those server are running under ESXi hypervisor in SAN environnement. Any way we are tunning all the plateform with several tools ( ApacheBench for web load and fakesms for kannel) we want to profit of all the hardware ressources with optimizing all componenents to reach the limits of the hardware, but still are still far behind the real capability of the hardware. The fact is we have reached 800 sms /s with the operators and its fine, but we want more not that we need it right now but just to master how every things work... The WEB/DB side tunning is well done due to fact that we have mastered it in our webs servers but the kannel side is litle different. with fakesms we are sending about 1000 sms / s from each kannel so we want to manage 3000 sms / s in our portal but all the kannel dosent send them with the speed we want even if they are not even litle solicited, we noticed that the bottle neck is between the smsbox and the bearerbox we dont know exactly but all 1000 sms arrive instantelly to the bearerbox in each kannel and a queue is formed between the bearerbox and smsbox, the smsbox send to the web server ( the portal ) about 1200 request / s wich is far from his limit ( we have tunning it to manage 3500 request / s ) I ve talked a lot but the main question is how we remove that so called queue smsbox/bearebox? to make the kannels send more than 1200 request/s so we can reach the limits in all the equippements all the system is running far behind his capabilitys. thinx for the help
Re: Tunning up kannel
HI thx for the relpay i was wondering if someone will help :) the fact is that we tunned the max-pending-requests and we ve concluded that about 800 is the best value and if we go up the results go worst, but the smsbox-max-pending we havent added such parametre; can you please explain it, is it, the smsbox-max-pending, is the queue between the smsbox and our portal? if i make it more simple: what is the difference between the tow variable that you gived to us : smsbox-max-pending and max-pending-requests ? and where are they placed, i mean if there is tow pending queue, i think one is in front of the bearerbox ( can i assume it is the max-pending-requests ?) and one between the bearerbox and the smsbox ? ( should it be the smsbox-max-pending ???) if my assumption are right i could be the bottleneck coz we havent touch such parametre, and if so the default value is about how much? thinx again for the help - Mail Original - De: DHC Admin dhcad...@gmail.com À: Ahmed BOUDHRAA ahmed.boudh...@inbmi.edunet.tn Cc: users@kannel.org Envoyé: Lundi 9 Juin 2014 13:50:46 Objet: Re: Tunning up kannel Hi Ahmed Have you tweaked the smsbox-max-pending and/or max-pending-requests? Check for them on the user guide On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Ahmed BOUDHRAA ahmed.boudh...@inbmi.edunet.tn wrote: Hi we are using kannel about 2 years in our institution and its woriking like a charm. we have high load traffic with 3 operators with 3 kannel gatways, our configuration is like this: - kannel 1 : Operator 1 : VM 2 x CPU 3 Ghz 8 Go Ram - kannel 2 : Operator 2 : VM 2 x CPU 3 Ghz 8 Go Ram - kannel 3 : Operator 3 : VM 2 x CPU 3 Ghz 8 Go Ram - Web Portal: for all kannel : VM 8 x CPU 3 Ghz 32 Go RAM - Postgres Database behind the web server : VM 8 x CPU 3 Ghz 32 Go RAM All those server are running under ESXi hypervisor in SAN environnement. Any way we are tunning all the plateform with several tools ( ApacheBench for web load and fakesms for kannel) we want to profit of all the hardware ressources with optimizing all componenents to reach the limits of the hardware, but still are still far behind the real capability of the hardware. The fact is we have reached 800 sms /s with the operators and its fine, but we want more not that we need it right now but just to master how every things work... The WEB/DB side tunning is well done due to fact that we have mastered it in our webs servers but the kannel side is litle different. with fakesms we are sending about 1000 sms / s from each kannel so we want to manage 3000 sms / s in our portal but all the kannel dosent send them with the speed we want even if they are not even litle solicited, we noticed that the bottle neck is between the smsbox and the bearerbox we dont know exactly but all 1000 sms arrive instantelly to the bearerbox in each kannel and a queue is formed between the bearerbox and smsbox, the smsbox send to the web server ( the portal ) about 1200 request / s wich is far from his limit ( we have tunning it to manage 3500 request / s ) I ve talked a lot but the main question is how we remove that so called queue smsbox/bearebox? to make the kannels send more than 1200 request/s so we can reach the limits in all the equippements all the system is running far behind his capabilitys. thinx for the help
Re: submit_sm to same recipeint
SMSC can identify it as a spam attempt, since spam analysis is one of the first things to activate before the message is handed over for delivery. I don't think kannel causes any problem in this. Do remember the buffer limit for each individual number is around 30 or 50 at one time. You might be breaching that as well, after which SMSC is bound to throw error. On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:21 PM, [Digital^Dude] ® millennium@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Is there any possibility that kannel gw fails a burst of submit_sm when the recipient address is the same?
Re: CANT SEND MESSAGES OUT, I DONT KNOW WHICH FILE TO GIVE PERMISSION
The problem is probably in mail.php file. Check it carefully. On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Ayubu Lulesu alul...@gmail.com wrote: Dear friends, i have been struggling without success to send sms to users phone from my system. some people said that i have to grant permission to user kannel to access the file. My problem is: 1. I dont know how to give the permission to that user (kannel) 2. i dont know which file i should give permission to kannel. when i try to send the sms i get the following error, please help me :'( *Warning: file(http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=ayubupassword=lulesuto=0769261977text=secret+number+is+roll http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=ayubupassword=lulesuto=0769261977text=secret+number+is+roll): failed to open stream: Connection refused in/var/www/html/booking-final/mail.php on line 3*
Re: Tunning up kannel
2014-06-09 17:08 GMT+04:00 Ahmed BOUDHRAA ahmed.boudh...@inbmi.edunet.tn: HI thx for the relpay i was wondering if someone will help :) the fact is that we tunned the max-pending-requests and we ve concluded that about 800 is the best value and if we go up the results go worst, but the smsbox-max-pending we havent added such parametre; can you please explain it, is it, the smsbox-max-pending, is the queue between the smsbox and our portal? I can't imagine why do you need such high rate of sending MT messages for university unless you're spamming your students every second .. The speed also very much depends on your SMSC upstream providers, network link between you and them, TCP RTT (re-transmissions), etc. The general settings for throughput between you and smsc are: 1) throughput -- limits MT/sec 2) max-pending-submits -- unofficial parameter, controls how many outstanding operations between you and SMSC (e.g. unacknowledged submit_sm packets) Try tuning these two parameters to get maximum of your upstream SMSC. Do it carefully to not get THROTTLED errors or MAX_QUEUE errors. Consulting your provider is highly recommended. if i make it more simple: what is the difference between the tow variable that you gived to us : smsbox-max-pending and max-pending-requests ? and where are they placed, i mean if there is tow pending queue, i think one is in front of the bearerbox ( can i assume it is the max-pending-requests ?) and one between the bearerbox and the smsbox ? ( should it be the smsbox-max-pending ???) if my assumption are right i could be the bottleneck coz we havent touch such parametre, and if so the default value is about how much? check user-guide, it's available on the WEB: http://kannel.org/download/kannel-userguide-snapshot/userguide.html bottleneck is most likely your code in DLR-url parsing script not the kannel itself. try testing with different conditions: 1) without DLR reports at all 2) with DLR but without your url hit 3) with DLR and your URL Also, you might want to consider switching over to sqlbox, so you won't need to drag web-server each time report comes. thinx again for the help - Mail Original - De: DHC Admin dhcad...@gmail.com À: Ahmed BOUDHRAA ahmed.boudh...@inbmi.edunet.tn Cc: users@kannel.org Envoyé: Lundi 9 Juin 2014 13:50:46 Objet: Re: Tunning up kannel Hi Ahmed Have you tweaked the smsbox-max-pending and/or max-pending-requests? Check for them on the user guide On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Ahmed BOUDHRAA ahmed.boudh...@inbmi.edunet.tn wrote: Hi we are using kannel about 2 years in our institution and its woriking like a charm. we have high load traffic with 3 operators with 3 kannel gatways, our configuration is like this: - kannel 1 : Operator 1 : VM 2 x CPU 3 Ghz 8 Go Ram - kannel 2 : Operator 2 : VM 2 x CPU 3 Ghz 8 Go Ram - kannel 3 : Operator 3 : VM 2 x CPU 3 Ghz 8 Go Ram - Web Portal: for all kannel : VM 8 x CPU 3 Ghz 32 Go RAM - Postgres Database behind the web server : VM 8 x CPU 3 Ghz 32 Go RAM All those server are running under ESXi hypervisor in SAN environnement. Any way we are tunning all the plateform with several tools ( ApacheBench for web load and fakesms for kannel) we want to profit of all the hardware ressources with optimizing all componenents to reach the limits of the hardware, but still are still far behind the real capability of the hardware. The fact is we have reached 800 sms /s with the operators and its fine, but we want more not that we need it right now but just to master how every things work... The WEB/DB side tunning is well done due to fact that we have mastered it in our webs servers but the kannel side is litle different. with fakesms we are sending about 1000 sms / s from each kannel so we want to manage 3000 sms / s in our portal but all the kannel dosent send them with the speed we want even if they are not even litle solicited, we noticed that the bottle neck is between the smsbox and the bearerbox we dont know exactly but all 1000 sms arrive instantelly to the bearerbox in each kannel and a queue is formed between the bearerbox and smsbox, the smsbox send to the web server ( the portal ) about 1200 request / s wich is far from his limit ( we have tunning it to manage 3500 request / s ) I ve talked a lot but the main question is how we remove that so called queue smsbox/bearebox? to make the kannels send more than 1200 request/s so we can reach the limits in all the equippements all the system is running far behind his capabilitys. thinx for the help
Re: submit_sm to same recipeint
2014-06-09 17:38 GMT+04:00 ha...@aeon.pk ha...@aeon.pk: SMSC can identify it as a spam attempt, since spam analysis is one of the first things to activate before the message is handed over for delivery. I don't think kannel causes any problem in this. Do remember the buffer limit for each individual number is around 30 or 50 at one time. You might be breaching that as well, after which SMSC is bound to throw error. On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:21 PM, [Digital^Dude] ® millennium@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Is there any possibility that kannel gw fails a burst of submit_sm when the recipient address is the same? might be filtering issue at your SMSC provider.
Re: call handling in kannel
Kannel cannot handle calls. It's the AT command which is only displaying the modem status. You cannot really make kannel identify the incoming call data and then take any action on it, in simple form. On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Alvaro Cornejo cornejo.alv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi As told before, you need to configure your modem for this. Check AT+CLI comand Regards Alvaro |-| Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.perusms.com On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Alok Srivastava alok...@gmail.com wrote: yes getting an entry in modem log(ttyUSB1.log) of kannel like 2014-06-04 10:35:49 [32020] [7] DEBUG: AT2[ttyUSB1]: -- RING 2014-06-04 10:35:49 [32020] [7] DEBUG: AT2[ttyUSB1]: -- ATH0^M 2014-06-04 10:35:49 [32020] [7] DEBUG: AT2[ttyUSB1]: -- OK But not getting incoming call number.. regards abhi On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Alvaro Cornejo cornejo.alv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Check your modem log --in debug mode--. If call hits your modem you should see at least one ring entry. Note that there is an AT command to tell the modem to drop any incoming call at the first ring... sorry didn't remember which... getting to my 50ties :) It might also be that your SIM (operator configuration) does not allow voice calls. Try moving sim to a standard phone a test calling from /to that device and/or talk to your operator to see if voice calls are allowed on your sim. You can also try the opposite: Put the working sim from your phone to the modem and try to call it. Regards Alvaro |-| Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.perusms.com On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Alok Srivastava alok...@gmail.com wrote: thanks Alvaro for ur help, actually i was not saying ring on modem, i was not listening any ring on my mobile when i m calling any number of modem. when i call a number of modem from my mobile no, it just cut off the phone. when i stop kannel, ring goes properly i want call can also be handled with kannel.but problem is that call is not going on modem's number when kannel is running. Regards Abhi On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Alvaro Cornejo cornejo.alv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Modems usually does not have speakers; therefore you will not hear any ring; however if you have your logs in debug mode, you will see a ring entry on it. You might also need to set your modem to verbose messages (AT+CMEE). Also, if you want to 'see' the caller number along the 'ring' entry, you need to enable that in modem configuration. I think command AT+CLI is the one does that. You need to add it to modem init config. Check AT command set info for details. As for receiving a sms with the caller information, kannel does not do it. You can patch it in order to do that or you can parse kannel log in order to get that information and send the sms. Regards Alvaro |-| Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.perusms.com On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Alok Srivastava alok...@gmail.com wrote: Actually not getting any ring when try to calling on numbers of modem. Regards On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Alok Srivastava alok...@gmail.com wrote: Dear list Plz help i am using wavecom 16 port modem for incoming messages, using sqlbox getting messages properly, but there is a requirement if somebody calling on numbers of modem i want a sms message on my mobile that incoming call from this number 91XX. Is it Possible. Please Help Regards Abhi
Re: Messages count for SMSC
'Grep' the date, message status (Sent) and then SMSC id in the access.log file from Linux command prompt. Alternatively, you can run MySQL query over sentsms table if you are using sqlbox (which is the best way). On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Ali Kashif syedalikas...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Users, I have multiple SMSCs connected, and Kannel is doing some prefix based routing of messages, At end of month i need to count how many messages has been sent from each SMSc, I can see the access.log for kannel and there is 2014-06-01 08:04:59 Sent SMS [SMSC:nahsms] i was thinking if i can add a mysql query in place where the above log is being writen, which just update number in mysql table against SMSC, Can anyone me tell me which file i should look and modify. and Will that be a good idea, considering that i am sending 100,000 SMS per day. Thanks Ali
Re: carrier retries on SMPP bind
You need to tweak your window size, on your side as well as operator side. This parameter controls the ACK of the messages exchanged between SMSC and your kannel client. On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Beck, Stuart (ADE-MNT) stuart.b...@mnetmobile.com wrote: Hi All, I've recently encountered a problem with our SMPP binds to one of our carriers That I'm wondering if anyone can help me with. during a period of higher than usual requests to one of our services we started getting reports that multiple MT's were being received at the handsets. During the investigation it was determined that the carrier was sending multiple MO requests to us in the belief that we had not received the original requests. Further: - The carrier was expecting submit_sm_resp messages back from submit_sm requests within (carrier defined) 13 seconds. The carrier will not be adjusting this timeout. - Our Kannel gateway was sending the submit_sm_resp messages but not necessarily within the 13 second carrier specified timeout, at which point the carrier retries the request. - more legitimate MO's combining with the retried MO's being delayed just caused the problem to snowball. As part of the process to avoid this in future, I have upgraded Kannel, and installed it on a faster box. Now however It is reported that the problem is here again. The new server is running kannel trunk from SVN as of May 8, running on Solaris 11.1 with a few modifications to allow it to build. Our carrier configuration is as follows: we have 3 binds with the following configuration group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = smscgroup host = aa.bb.cc.dd #port = 2775 # disabled, this is a receive bind only receive-port = 2775 transceiver-mode = false interface-version = 34 smsc-username = XXX smsc-password = XXX system-type = smpp address-range = 0 source-addr-ton = 0 source-addr-npi = 4 dest-addr-ton = 1 dest-addr-npi = 1 alt-charset=ASCII enquire-link-interval = 30 allowed-smsc-id = smscgroup msg-id-type = 0x01 log-file = /data/kannel/log/bearer-smscgroupX.log log-level = 1 reconnect-delay = 170 I have tried googling around to see if there is anything I might want to have a look at but have not had much success. max-pending-submits, wait-ack, wait-ack-expire - all seem to operate on outbound MTs so I am unsure where to go from here. I will be enabling debug logging when I am back in the office, however I like to find out if anyone else has had any experience of this behavior. Any suggestions as to anything I could do to force our gateway to present the submit_sm_resp messages within the required timeframe or things I could do to help my configuration in general Stuart. -- Stuart Beck
Re: Kannel store-type question
It stores both MT and MO. MT in case it is unable to forward to SMSC/modem, and MO if it is unable to find a service in smsbox configuration (or if smsbox is not connected). On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Hanh Le Bich hanhmi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi list, I running kannel with store-type = file. As i gather from manual docs, kannel store the MT messages only. But what i'm seeing at store-status there are a lot of MO messages stored as Type field marked is MO. Why? Regards, Hanh.
Re: I am unable to connect my Kannel to SMSC
Post the error logs. On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote: Read the users guide at http://www.kannel.org/download/1.5.0/userguide-1.5.0/userguide.html *From:* users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] *On Behalf Of *Anil Singh Bafila *Sent:* zondag 27 april 2014 11:26 *To:* users *Subject:* I am unable to connect my Kannel to SMSC I am unable to connect my Kannel to SMSC. through smpp prtocall Can any one provide me links refrence to sample kannel.conf for connecting to SMSC. I am using centos 6.5 I installed kannel using yum install kannel .I used this reference material for installing only Kannel http://inuits.eu/blog/sms-server-using-centos-kannel-and-playsms Please provide some use full links for configuring and managing SMPP protocall. I have already gone through user and architecture guide and all material on kannel.org Thanks [image: Image removed by sender.] -- Regards Anil Singh Bafila Institute of Informatics Communication University of Delhi South Campus -- Anil Singh Bafila Institute of Informatics Communication University of Delhi South Campus
Message identifier for returning DLR
Hi, I'm trying to use foreign_id field in sendsms table to mark the outgoing message for DLR matching in return, however it's not working since kannel puts its own FID every time. How to put message identifier in kannel logs to track the message for returning DLRs? I mean, which field to use? Regards, Hamza
Re: Number(s) has/have been denied by white- and/or black-lists.
Hi Mohammad
You need to know how to encrypt/decrypt those numbers in order to be
able send/receive messages to those numbers.
It has no sense to send encrypted information to a partner but didn't
tell him how to decrypt it? He will never be able to know the
information you sent him. Encryption is used to avoid a 3rd party to
see data content.
How are you supposed to bill your customer or send him a message or
know who is sending you a message if you don't know who the message
belongs to?. The MUST tell you how to do it.
About allowing kannel to handle encrypted numbers... you can develop a
patch for that.
Regards
Alvaro
|-|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
celular y Nextel
en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
SMS y GPRS online
Visitenos en www.perusms.com
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Mohammad Abu Karim mabuka...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Otandeka,
Thanks for your reply,
I have asked the operator before submitting to the Kannel Users, and What
they said is develop your gateway to handle sending to alias/encrypted
number.
Is there any way to make kannel to accept the alias/encrypted msisdn's
instead of the pain text msisdn.
Advice please
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Otandeka Simon Peter sotand...@gmail.com
wrote:
The problem is from your provider. Kannel recognizes numbers and not
alphabetic letters.
On Jun 7, 2014 6:43 PM, Mohammad Abu Karim mabuka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Can I get help on the below problem which I am facing?
Advice please
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Mohammad Abu Karim mabuka...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dears,
I have recently installed Kannel 1.5.0
The operator forward the SMPP Mo traffic to my side, but the MSISDNs
coming encrypted like: AAEAADW0AAq4BweYJXU=
When I am trying send SMS to the above MSISDN: AAEAADW0AAq4BweYJXU=
http://host:port/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=userpassword=pppcharset=UTF-8coding=2to=AAEAADW0AAq4BweYJXU=text=text+messagefrom=12345smsc=UMNIAH
Or
http://host:port/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=userpassword=pppcharset=UTF-8coding=2to=AAEAADW0AAq4BweYJXU%3dtext=text+messagefrom=12345smsc=UMNIAH
I am getting the below message:
Number(s) has/have been denied by white- and/or black-lists.
Advice please How I can make kannel to send message to the above
encrypted MSISDN?
The below my kannel conf:
group = core
admin-port = 13000
smsbox-port = 13001
admin-password = user
status-password = ppp
#admin-deny-ip =
admin-allow-ip = localhost
log-file = /var/log/kannel.log
log-level = 0
box-deny-ip = *.*.*.*
box-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1
#unified-prefix = +358,00358,0;+,00
access-log = /var/log/kannel-access.log
#store-file = kannel.store
#ssl-server-cert-file = cert.pem
#ssl-server-key-file = key.pem
#ssl-certkey-file = mycertandprivkeyfile.pem
#dlr-storage = internal
dlr-storage = mysql
sms-resend-freq = 10
sms-resend-retry = 0
sms-combine-concatenated-mo = 1
group = mysql-connection
id = dlr-db
host = localhost
username = root
password = ass
database = mo
max-connections = 20
group = dlr-db
id = dlr-db
table = dlr
field-smsc = smsc
field-timestamp = ts
field-destination = destination
field-source = source
field-service = service
field-url = url
field-mask = mask
field-status = status
field-boxc-id = boxc
group = smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = UMNIAH_CONN
host = 10.1.4.6
port = 2345
receive-port = 2345
#transceiver-mode = 1
smsc-username = username
smsc-password = 12345
keepalive = 10
enquire-link-interval = 10
system-type = smpp
allowed-smsc-id = UMNIAH_CONN
interface-version = 34
address-range =
reconnect-delay = 10
source-addr-ton = 5
source-addr-npi = 1
dest-addr-ton = 1
dest-addr-npi = 1
bind-addr-ton = 0
bind-addr-npi = 0
msg-id-type = 0x00
log-file = /var/log/umniah_smpp.log
group = smsbox
bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
sendsms-port = 13013
sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz /()*...@#¤%{}£$
log-file = /var/log/smsbox.log
log-level = 0
access-log = /var/log/smsbox-access.log
mo-recode = 1
group = sendsms-user
username = tester
password = foobar
max-messages = 6
concatenation = true
group = sms-service
keyword = default
get-url =
http://localhost/catch.php?org_sms=%bmsisdn=%pshortcode=%Psmpp_conn=%icoding=%cudh=%uorg_smsc=%fcharset=%C;
omit-empty = true
max-messages = 10
concatenation = 1
Waiting your kind help
Regards
--
Regards
--
Thank You Best Regards,
--
Thank You Best Regards,
Re: Tunning up kannel
Because you were talking about very high number, I have assumed it was a MO rate, and not MT rate. What is your MT throughput? On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:40 AM, spameden spame...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-06-09 17:08 GMT+04:00 Ahmed BOUDHRAA ahmed.boudh...@inbmi.edunet.tn : HI thx for the relpay i was wondering if someone will help :) the fact is that we tunned the max-pending-requests and we ve concluded that about 800 is the best value and if we go up the results go worst, but the smsbox-max-pending we havent added such parametre; can you please explain it, is it, the smsbox-max-pending, is the queue between the smsbox and our portal? I can't imagine why do you need such high rate of sending MT messages for university unless you're spamming your students every second .. The speed also very much depends on your SMSC upstream providers, network link between you and them, TCP RTT (re-transmissions), etc. The general settings for throughput between you and smsc are: 1) throughput -- limits MT/sec 2) max-pending-submits -- unofficial parameter, controls how many outstanding operations between you and SMSC (e.g. unacknowledged submit_sm packets) Try tuning these two parameters to get maximum of your upstream SMSC. Do it carefully to not get THROTTLED errors or MAX_QUEUE errors. Consulting your provider is highly recommended. if i make it more simple: what is the difference between the tow variable that you gived to us : smsbox-max-pending and max-pending-requests ? and where are they placed, i mean if there is tow pending queue, i think one is in front of the bearerbox ( can i assume it is the max-pending-requests ?) and one between the bearerbox and the smsbox ? ( should it be the smsbox-max-pending ???) if my assumption are right i could be the bottleneck coz we havent touch such parametre, and if so the default value is about how much? check user-guide, it's available on the WEB: http://kannel.org/download/kannel-userguide-snapshot/userguide.html bottleneck is most likely your code in DLR-url parsing script not the kannel itself. try testing with different conditions: 1) without DLR reports at all 2) with DLR but without your url hit 3) with DLR and your URL Also, you might want to consider switching over to sqlbox, so you won't need to drag web-server each time report comes. thinx again for the help - Mail Original - De: DHC Admin dhcad...@gmail.com À: Ahmed BOUDHRAA ahmed.boudh...@inbmi.edunet.tn Cc: users@kannel.org Envoyé: Lundi 9 Juin 2014 13:50:46 Objet: Re: Tunning up kannel Hi Ahmed Have you tweaked the smsbox-max-pending and/or max-pending-requests? Check for them on the user guide On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Ahmed BOUDHRAA ahmed.boudh...@inbmi.edunet.tn wrote: Hi we are using kannel about 2 years in our institution and its woriking like a charm. we have high load traffic with 3 operators with 3 kannel gatways, our configuration is like this: - kannel 1 : Operator 1 : VM 2 x CPU 3 Ghz 8 Go Ram - kannel 2 : Operator 2 : VM 2 x CPU 3 Ghz 8 Go Ram - kannel 3 : Operator 3 : VM 2 x CPU 3 Ghz 8 Go Ram - Web Portal: for all kannel : VM 8 x CPU 3 Ghz 32 Go RAM - Postgres Database behind the web server : VM 8 x CPU 3 Ghz 32 Go RAM All those server are running under ESXi hypervisor in SAN environnement. Any way we are tunning all the plateform with several tools ( ApacheBench for web load and fakesms for kannel) we want to profit of all the hardware ressources with optimizing all componenents to reach the limits of the hardware, but still are still far behind the real capability of the hardware. The fact is we have reached 800 sms /s with the operators and its fine, but we want more not that we need it right now but just to master how every things work... The WEB/DB side tunning is well done due to fact that we have mastered it in our webs servers but the kannel side is litle different. with fakesms we are sending about 1000 sms / s from each kannel so we want to manage 3000 sms / s in our portal but all the kannel dosent send them with the speed we want even if they are not even litle solicited, we noticed that the bottle neck is between the smsbox and the bearerbox we dont know exactly but all 1000 sms arrive instantelly to the bearerbox in each kannel and a queue is formed between the bearerbox and smsbox, the smsbox send to the web server ( the portal ) about 1200 request / s wich is far from his limit ( we have tunning it to manage 3500 request / s ) I ve talked a lot but the main question is how we remove that so called queue smsbox/bearebox? to make the kannels send more than 1200 request/s so we can reach the limits in all the equippements all the system is running far behind his capabilitys. thinx for the help
Re: Number(s) has/have been denied by white- and/or black-lists.
It's a stupid implementation by your operator to implement privacy
middleware. If they are scrambling real number, at least let the recipient
number be in number format, even scrambled. Not only kannel, but almost all
SMS gateways will NOT allow you to send messages to alphanumerics. Ask them
to recommend a gateway to send SMS, and don't let them say 'Write your own'.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Alvaro Cornejo cornejo.alv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Mohammad
You need to know how to encrypt/decrypt those numbers in order to be
able send/receive messages to those numbers.
It has no sense to send encrypted information to a partner but didn't
tell him how to decrypt it? He will never be able to know the
information you sent him. Encryption is used to avoid a 3rd party to
see data content.
How are you supposed to bill your customer or send him a message or
know who is sending you a message if you don't know who the message
belongs to?. The MUST tell you how to do it.
About allowing kannel to handle encrypted numbers... you can develop a
patch for that.
Regards
Alvaro
|-|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
celular y Nextel
en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
SMS y GPRS online
Visitenos en www.perusms.com
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Mohammad Abu Karim mabuka...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear Otandeka,
Thanks for your reply,
I have asked the operator before submitting to the Kannel Users, and What
they said is develop your gateway to handle sending to alias/encrypted
number.
Is there any way to make kannel to accept the alias/encrypted msisdn's
instead of the pain text msisdn.
Advice please
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Otandeka Simon Peter
sotand...@gmail.com
wrote:
The problem is from your provider. Kannel recognizes numbers and not
alphabetic letters.
On Jun 7, 2014 6:43 PM, Mohammad Abu Karim mabuka...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
Can I get help on the below problem which I am facing?
Advice please
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Mohammad Abu Karim
mabuka...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dears,
I have recently installed Kannel 1.5.0
The operator forward the SMPP Mo traffic to my side, but the MSISDNs
coming encrypted like: AAEAADW0AAq4BweYJXU=
When I am trying send SMS to the above MSISDN: AAEAADW0AAq4BweYJXU=
http://host:port
/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=userpassword=pppcharset=UTF-8coding=2to=AAEAADW0AAq4BweYJXU=text=text+messagefrom=12345smsc=UMNIAH
Or
http://host:port
/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=userpassword=pppcharset=UTF-8coding=2to=AAEAADW0AAq4BweYJXU%3dtext=text+messagefrom=12345smsc=UMNIAH
I am getting the below message:
Number(s) has/have been denied by white- and/or black-lists.
Advice please How I can make kannel to send message to the above
encrypted MSISDN?
The below my kannel conf:
group = core
admin-port = 13000
smsbox-port = 13001
admin-password = user
status-password = ppp
#admin-deny-ip =
admin-allow-ip = localhost
log-file = /var/log/kannel.log
log-level = 0
box-deny-ip = *.*.*.*
box-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1
#unified-prefix = +358,00358,0;+,00
access-log = /var/log/kannel-access.log
#store-file = kannel.store
#ssl-server-cert-file = cert.pem
#ssl-server-key-file = key.pem
#ssl-certkey-file = mycertandprivkeyfile.pem
#dlr-storage = internal
dlr-storage = mysql
sms-resend-freq = 10
sms-resend-retry = 0
sms-combine-concatenated-mo = 1
group = mysql-connection
id = dlr-db
host = localhost
username = root
password = ass
database = mo
max-connections = 20
group = dlr-db
id = dlr-db
table = dlr
field-smsc = smsc
field-timestamp = ts
field-destination = destination
field-source = source
field-service = service
field-url = url
field-mask = mask
field-status = status
field-boxc-id = boxc
group = smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = UMNIAH_CONN
host = 10.1.4.6
port = 2345
receive-port = 2345
#transceiver-mode = 1
smsc-username = username
smsc-password = 12345
keepalive = 10
enquire-link-interval = 10
system-type = smpp
allowed-smsc-id = UMNIAH_CONN
interface-version = 34
address-range =
reconnect-delay = 10
source-addr-ton = 5
source-addr-npi = 1
dest-addr-ton = 1
dest-addr-npi = 1
bind-addr-ton = 0
bind-addr-npi = 0
msg-id-type = 0x00
log-file = /var/log/umniah_smpp.log
group = smsbox
bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
sendsms-port = 13013
sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz /()*...@#¤%{}£$
log-file = /var/log/smsbox.log
log-level = 0
access-log = /var/log/smsbox-access.log
mo-recode = 1
group = sendsms-user
username = tester
password = foobar
max-messages = 6
concatenation =
Re: CANT SEND MESSAGES OUT, I DONT KNOW WHICH FILE TO GIVE PERMISSION
2014-06-07 22:26 GMT+04:00 Ayubu Lulesu alul...@gmail.com: Dear friends, i have been struggling without success to send sms to users phone from my system. some people said that i have to grant permission to user kannel to access the file. My problem is: 1. I dont know how to give the permission to that user (kannel) 2. i dont know which file i should give permission to kannel. when i try to send the sms i get the following error, please help me :'( *Warning: file(http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=ayubupassword=lulesuto=0769261977text=secret+number+is+roll http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=ayubupassword=lulesuto=0769261977text=secret+number+is+roll): failed to open stream: Connection refused in/var/www/html/booking-final/mail.php on line 3* It clearly says *Connection Refused*. Which means kannel's web-server is not working properly, check logs of bearerbox.log and smsbox.log, try starting bearerbox/smsbox from console to see output if you're not sure where to look for logs.
Re: Messages count for SMSC
2014-06-09 17:46 GMT+04:00 ha...@aeon.pk ha...@aeon.pk: 'Grep' the date, message status (Sent) and then SMSC id in the access.log file from Linux command prompt. Alternatively, you can run MySQL query over sentsms table if you are using sqlbox (which is the best way). On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Ali Kashif syedalikas...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Users, I have multiple SMSCs connected, and Kannel is doing some prefix based routing of messages, At end of month i need to count how many messages has been sent from each SMSc, I can see the access.log for kannel and there is 2014-06-01 08:04:59 Sent SMS [SMSC:nahsms] i was thinking if i can add a mysql query in place where the above log is being writen, which just update number in mysql table against SMSC, Can anyone me tell me which file i should look and modify. and Will that be a good idea, considering that i am sending 100,000 SMS per day. Check sqlbox it might suit all your needs if you tweak it a bit. Thanks Ali
Re: Kannel store-type question
2014-05-09 7:33 GMT+04:00 Hanh Le Bich hanhmi...@gmail.com: Hi list, I running kannel with store-type = file. As i gather from manual docs, kannel store the MT messages only. But what i'm seeing at store-status there are a lot of MO messages stored as Type field marked is MO. Why? Regards, Hanh. store-type is used to store temporary messages for bearerbox to process to. MT/MO/DLR stored there. difference between store-type = file and store-type = spool is: in first case you store message-data in 1 special file whilst in second - you store message-data in separate files.
Re: Message identifier for returning DLR
Isn't dlr-url fixed for all messages in kannel config? How will I set different identifier for different messages in it? On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:46 PM, spameden spame...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-06-09 18:00 GMT+04:00 ha...@aeon.pk ha...@aeon.pk: Hi, I'm trying to use foreign_id field in sendsms table to mark the outgoing message for DLR matching in return, however it's not working since kannel puts its own FID every time. How to put message identifier in kannel logs to track the message for returning DLRs? I mean, which field to use? Regards, Hamza use dlr_url field.
Re: Tunning up kannel
Thinx spameden Our plateform is made for publishing mainlly baccalaureate results, and tow other grades this is the main use right now, all those are about 240 000 canditates the fact is they may look like not much, but its a very important event that every parents/student attends the problematic its not about the nember but about the ammount of incoming/outgoing sms in a short time, last year we have reached the 800 sms /s in the operator side so you can imagine how it could be stressfull for us / the operators / the parents-students we cant allow any unavalability or too much wait, you can add to that that our plateform will do other things in the future :) for the throughput between as and the operators we fixied it in accordance with them every operator have specific capabilities but as i said our plateform can manage them at ease, what we want is to prepare our self, and to understand all the possible problem/solutions that we may have in using kannel. For the web server side, i cant assure that he is far from his real capabilities we are using RHEL web servers from long now. for the current configuration our web server can serve about 4000 requests / s i ll try below to describe a simple test we made usining fakesms: We are launching this test from our 3 kannel server simultanisouly : ./fakesmsc -i 0.001 -m 1 100 200 text test 00* == this mean about 1000 sms /s from each kannel technically we could say that our portal should manage 3000 sms / s when we llaunch the test we can see on the kannel status in the box connections rubrique the Queued (MO) started 1 x 3 and it take about 5 minutes to empty the three queue now what we want to understand is how the viewed queue is empty, the web server is far from his treatement capabilities and still messages are comming about 1-2 sms /s after about 15000 have reached the database. I dont know if i m clear normally when the queue is empty we have to have 3 sms on the database side, wich mean there is another queue somewhere else this is our smskannel.conf : we are not using dlr nor internal storage: group = core admin-port = 13000 smsbox-port = 2776 admin-password = 123456 box-deny-ip = *.*.*.* box-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1 log-file = /var/log/kannel/kannel.log log-level = 0 access-log = /var/log/kannel/access_kannel.log access-log-clean = true access-log-format= SMS %t %l %i %p %P %b %F %I %k store-file =/var/log/kannel/sms.store dlr-storage = internal store-dump-freq = 5 sms-resend-freq = 60 sms-resend-retry = -1 #- # SMSC CONNECTIONS # # SMSC connections are created in bearerbox and they handle SMSC specific # protocol and message relying. You need these to actually receive and send # messages to handset, but can use GSM modems as virtual SMSCs group = smsc smsc = fake smsc-id = fake port = 1 group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = TT host = x.x.x.x port = log-file = /var/log/kannel/tt1.log log-level = 0 transceiver-mode = 1 receive-port = smsc-username = user smsc-password = pass system-type = 'VMA' interface-version = 34 preferred-smsc-id = TT group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = TT host = x.x.x.x port = log-file = /var/log/kannel/tt2.log log-level = 0 transceiver-mode = 1 receive-port = smsc-username = user smsc-password = pass system-type = 'VMA' #service-type = 'test' interface-version = 34 preferred-smsc-id = TT group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = TT host = x.x.x.x port = log-file = /var/log/kannel/tt3.log log-level = 0 transceiver-mode = 1 receive-port = smsc-username = user smsc-password = pass system-type = 'VMA' interface-version = 34 preferred-smsc-id = TT group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = TT host = x.x.x.x port = log-file = /var/log/kannel/tt4.log log-level = 0 transceiver-mode = 1 receive-port = smsc-username = user smsc-password = pass system-type = 'VMA' interface-version = 34 preferred-smsc-id = TT group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = TT host = x.x.x.x port = log-file = /var/log/kannel/tt5.log log-level = 0 transceiver-mode = 1 receive-port = smsc-username = user smsc-password = pass system-type = 'VMA' interface-version = 34 preferred-smsc-id = TT group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = TT host = x.x.x.x port = log-file = /var/log/kannel/tt6.log log-level = 0 transceiver-mode = 1 receive-port = smsc-username = user smsc-password = pass system-type = 'VMA' interface-version = 34 preferred-smsc-id = TT group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = TT host = x.x.x.x port = log-file = /var/log/kannel/tt7.log log-level = 0 transceiver-mode = 1 receive-port = smsc-username = user smsc-password = pass system-type = 'VMA' interface-version = 34 preferred-smsc-id = TT group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = TT host = x.x.x.x
Re: Message identifier for returning DLR
2014-06-09 18:58 GMT+04:00 ha...@aeon.pk ha...@aeon.pk: Isn't dlr-url fixed for all messages in kannel config? How will I set different identifier for different messages in it? Config sets only default dlr_url for all messages (if you don't specify your own). You can set dlr_url in sqlbox source code dynamically (TIP: use time/date nanoseconds to generate it) and link to DLR messages through this field. This is the only field which is being saved when DLR comes. On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:46 PM, spameden spame...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-06-09 18:00 GMT+04:00 ha...@aeon.pk ha...@aeon.pk: Hi, I'm trying to use foreign_id field in sendsms table to mark the outgoing message for DLR matching in return, however it's not working since kannel puts its own FID every time. How to put message identifier in kannel logs to track the message for returning DLRs? I mean, which field to use? Regards, Hamza use dlr_url field.
Re: call handling in kannel
Hi The best solution might be to configure call forwarding on the line, forwarding calls to an invalid number, or to one that someone will take the call. As for kannel, you can only monitor the Caller ID adding the command AT+CLIP=1 on your init string. Regards Alvaro |-| Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.perusms.com On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:43 AM, ha...@aeon.pk ha...@aeon.pk wrote: Kannel cannot handle calls. It's the AT command which is only displaying the modem status. You cannot really make kannel identify the incoming call data and then take any action on it, in simple form. On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Alvaro Cornejo cornejo.alv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi As told before, you need to configure your modem for this. Check AT+CLI comand Regards Alvaro |-| Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.perusms.com On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Alok Srivastava alok...@gmail.com wrote: yes getting an entry in modem log(ttyUSB1.log) of kannel like 2014-06-04 10:35:49 [32020] [7] DEBUG: AT2[ttyUSB1]: -- RING 2014-06-04 10:35:49 [32020] [7] DEBUG: AT2[ttyUSB1]: -- ATH0^M 2014-06-04 10:35:49 [32020] [7] DEBUG: AT2[ttyUSB1]: -- OK But not getting incoming call number.. regards abhi On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Alvaro Cornejo cornejo.alv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Check your modem log --in debug mode--. If call hits your modem you should see at least one ring entry. Note that there is an AT command to tell the modem to drop any incoming call at the first ring... sorry didn't remember which... getting to my 50ties :) It might also be that your SIM (operator configuration) does not allow voice calls. Try moving sim to a standard phone a test calling from /to that device and/or talk to your operator to see if voice calls are allowed on your sim. You can also try the opposite: Put the working sim from your phone to the modem and try to call it. Regards Alvaro |-| Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.perusms.com On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Alok Srivastava alok...@gmail.com wrote: thanks Alvaro for ur help, actually i was not saying ring on modem, i was not listening any ring on my mobile when i m calling any number of modem. when i call a number of modem from my mobile no, it just cut off the phone. when i stop kannel, ring goes properly i want call can also be handled with kannel.but problem is that call is not going on modem's number when kannel is running. Regards Abhi On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Alvaro Cornejo cornejo.alv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Modems usually does not have speakers; therefore you will not hear any ring; however if you have your logs in debug mode, you will see a ring entry on it. You might also need to set your modem to verbose messages (AT+CMEE). Also, if you want to 'see' the caller number along the 'ring' entry, you need to enable that in modem configuration. I think command AT+CLI is the one does that. You need to add it to modem init config. Check AT command set info for details. As for receiving a sms with the caller information, kannel does not do it. You can patch it in order to do that or you can parse kannel log in order to get that information and send the sms. Regards Alvaro |-| Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.perusms.com On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Alok Srivastava alok...@gmail.com wrote: Actually not getting any ring when try to calling on numbers of modem. Regards On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Alok Srivastava alok...@gmail.com wrote: Dear list Plz help i am
Re: CANT SEND MESSAGES OUT, I DONT KNOW WHICH FILE TO GIVE PERMISSION
What do you get if you do enter http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=ayubupassword=lulesuto=0769261977text=secret+number+is+roll in a web browser on your localhost? Check ports on your config file Regards |-| Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.perusms.com On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:41 AM, spameden spame...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-06-07 22:26 GMT+04:00 Ayubu Lulesu alul...@gmail.com: Dear friends, i have been struggling without success to send sms to users phone from my system. some people said that i have to grant permission to user kannel to access the file. My problem is: 1. I dont know how to give the permission to that user (kannel) 2. i dont know which file i should give permission to kannel. when i try to send the sms i get the following error, please help me :'( Warning: file(http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=ayubupassword=lulesuto=0769261977text=secret+number+is+roll): failed to open stream: Connection refused in/var/www/html/booking-final/mail.php on line 3 It clearly says Connection Refused. Which means kannel's web-server is not working properly, check logs of bearerbox.log and smsbox.log, try starting bearerbox/smsbox from console to see output if you're not sure where to look for logs.
Re: Messages count for SMSC
You can also run wc command on your log files |-| Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.perusms.com On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:42 AM, spameden spame...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-06-09 17:46 GMT+04:00 ha...@aeon.pk ha...@aeon.pk: 'Grep' the date, message status (Sent) and then SMSC id in the access.log file from Linux command prompt. Alternatively, you can run MySQL query over sentsms table if you are using sqlbox (which is the best way). On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Ali Kashif syedalikas...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Users, I have multiple SMSCs connected, and Kannel is doing some prefix based routing of messages, At end of month i need to count how many messages has been sent from each SMSc, I can see the access.log for kannel and there is 2014-06-01 08:04:59 Sent SMS [SMSC:nahsms] i was thinking if i can add a mysql query in place where the above log is being writen, which just update number in mysql table against SMSC, Can anyone me tell me which file i should look and modify. and Will that be a good idea, considering that i am sending 100,000 SMS per day. Check sqlbox it might suit all your needs if you tweak it a bit. Thanks Ali
Re: Message identifier for returning DLR
In your dlr-url you can add ...my-id=MY_ID... and when calling the dlr-url make your app match for that MY_ID Regards |-| Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.perusms.com On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:05 AM, spameden spame...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-06-09 18:58 GMT+04:00 ha...@aeon.pk ha...@aeon.pk: Isn't dlr-url fixed for all messages in kannel config? How will I set different identifier for different messages in it? Config sets only default dlr_url for all messages (if you don't specify your own). You can set dlr_url in sqlbox source code dynamically (TIP: use time/date nanoseconds to generate it) and link to DLR messages through this field. This is the only field which is being saved when DLR comes. On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:46 PM, spameden spame...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-06-09 18:00 GMT+04:00 ha...@aeon.pk ha...@aeon.pk: Hi, I'm trying to use foreign_id field in sendsms table to mark the outgoing message for DLR matching in return, however it's not working since kannel puts its own FID every time. How to put message identifier in kannel logs to track the message for returning DLRs? I mean, which field to use? Regards, Hamza use dlr_url field.
Re: Tunning up kannel
Hi Ahmed Maybe the Bearebox has emptied the its queue and the queue moves to the smsbox? Are you sure you have enough resources to receive that much number of SMS at the same time? The Apache web server news to spawn (create) a big number of clients to handle the traffic, it might run out of resources for a few seconds and the smsbox could be resending the MOs later on, based on this configuration: http-request-retryinteger If set, specifies how many retries should be performed for failing HTTP requests of sms-services. Defaults to 0, which means no retries should be performed and hence no HTTP request queuing is done. http-queue-delayinteger If set, specifies how many seconds should pass within the HTTP queuing thread for retrying a failed HTTP request. Defaults to 10 sec. and is only obeyed if http-request-retry is set to a non-zero value. Have you tried to disable the HTTP retry and see if you loose any MO? Maybe they are getting retried. Please tell me where is that you see the MO Queue that you mention, are you just checking the status by console or using a HTML page? On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Ahmed BOUDHRAA ahmed.boudh...@inbmi.edunet.tn wrote: Thinx spameden Our plateform is made for publishing mainlly baccalaureate results, and tow other grades this is the main use right now, all those are about 240 000 canditates the fact is they may look like not much, but its a very important event that every parents/student attends the problematic its not about the nember but about the ammount of incoming/outgoing sms in a short time, last year we have reached the 800 sms /s in the operator side so you can imagine how it could be stressfull for us / the operators / the parents-students we cant allow any unavalability or too much wait, you can add to that that our plateform will do other things in the future :) for the throughput between as and the operators we fixied it in accordance with them every operator have specific capabilities but as i said our plateform can manage them at ease, what we want is to prepare our self, and to understand all the possible problem/solutions that we may have in using kannel. For the web server side, i cant assure that he is far from his real capabilities we are using RHEL web servers from long now. for the current configuration our web server can serve about 4000 requests / s i ll try below to describe a simple test we made usining fakesms: We are launching this test from our 3 kannel server simultanisouly : ./fakesmsc -i 0.001 -m 1 100 200 text test 00* == this mean about 1000 sms /s from each kannel technically we could say that our portal should manage 3000 sms / s when we llaunch the test we can see on the kannel status in the box connections rubrique the Queued (MO) started 1 x 3 and it take about 5 minutes to empty the three queue now what we want to understand is how the viewed queue is empty, the web server is far from his treatement capabilities and still messages are comming about 1-2 sms /s after about 15000 have reached the database. I dont know if i m clear normally when the queue is empty we have to have 3 sms on the database side, wich mean there is another queue somewhere else this is our smskannel.conf : we are not using dlr nor internal storage: group = core admin-port = 13000 smsbox-port = 2776 admin-password = 123456 box-deny-ip = *.*.*.* box-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1 log-file = /var/log/kannel/kannel.log log-level = 0 access-log = /var/log/kannel/access_kannel.log access-log-clean = true access-log-format= SMS %t %l %i %p %P %b %F %I %k store-file =/var/log/kannel/sms.store dlr-storage = internal store-dump-freq = 5 sms-resend-freq = 60 sms-resend-retry = -1 #- # SMSC CONNECTIONS # # SMSC connections are created in bearerbox and they handle SMSC specific # protocol and message relying. You need these to actually receive and send # messages to handset, but can use GSM modems as virtual SMSCs group = smsc smsc = fake smsc-id = fake port = 1 group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = TT host = x.x.x.x port = log-file = /var/log/kannel/tt1.log log-level = 0 transceiver-mode = 1 receive-port = smsc-username = user smsc-password = pass system-type = 'VMA' interface-version = 34 preferred-smsc-id = TT group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = TT host = x.x.x.x port = log-file = /var/log/kannel/tt2.log log-level = 0 transceiver-mode = 1 receive-port = smsc-username = user smsc-password = pass system-type = 'VMA' #service-type = 'test' interface-version = 34 preferred-smsc-id = TT group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = TT host = x.x.x.x port = log-file = /var/log/kannel/tt3.log log-level = 0 transceiver-mode = 1 receive-port = smsc-username = user smsc-password = pass system-type = 'VMA' interface-version = 34 preferred-smsc-id = TT group = smsc
Throughput option
Hello, I have kannel setup with latest svn code, I want to set throughput for 1 sms /10 sec or 200 sms / 15 minutes is it possible? i have setup throughput = 0.10 for one sms / 10 sec it is not following this rule and when i send 3 messages all goes together..
