Re: mcelog.service
On 06/21/2013 09:19 PM, lee wrote: And how would I disable it? Mdmonitor is stopped and disabled, and md is still running. systemctl stop SERVICENAME.service systemctl mask SERVICENAME.service -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
F18 prelink or dracut?
Anyone similar problems now or previous? Installed a kernel with yumex, didn't boot, so reinstalled with yum Reinstall 2 Packages Total size: 170 M Installed size: 170 M Is this ok [y/d/N]: y Downloading packages: Running transaction check Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded Running transaction Installing : kernel-doc-3.9.7-200.fc18.noarch 1/2 Installing : kernel-3.9.7-200.fc18.x86_64 2/2 /usr/lib/dracut/dracut-functions.sh: line 68: ldd: command not found /usr/sbin/prelink: /usr/bin/readlink: Dependency tracing failed /usr/sbin/prelink: /usr/bin/cp: Dependency tracing failed /usr/sbin/prelink: /usr/bin/kbd_mode: Dependency tracing failed snipped / yum provides */ldd Loaded plugins: lan, langpacks, priorities snipped glibc-common-2.16-31.fc18.x86_64 : Common binaries and locale data for glibc Repo: installed Matched from: Filename: /usr/bin/ldd /snipped -- Regards, Frank When in doubt PANIC! I check for new mail app. 20min www.frankly3d.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: san disk not seen by Linux 2.6.35.6-45.fc14.i686
Hi, What does fdisk -l show after you insert the sandisk USB device ? regards, Rami Rosen On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Randolph Jones jones...@qwest.net wrote: I have a 16gb sandisk with 2 pictures on it. shotwell can see the pictures when I connect my camera to usb port. Linux cant see the disk when plugged in to a usb adapter. Linux can see other sandisks in this adapter. The partition table is corrupted (I think) Linux sees the adapter but not the 16gb disk this is output of dmesg when I plug the disk into linux [ 2866.397099] usb 6-1: USB disconnect, address 5 [ 2869.880085] usb 6-1: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 6 [ 2870.051170] usb 6-1: New USB device found, idVendor=0a48, idProduct=5007 [ 2870.051181] usb 6-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0 [ 2870.051188] usb 6-1: Product: Secure Digital Keychain [ 2870.051194] usb 6-1: Manufacturer: mediaGear [ 2870.054850] scsi11 : usb-storage 6-1:1.0 [ 2871.066286] scsi 11:0:0:0: Direct-Access MG SD-Key 1.00 PQ: 0 ANSI: 0 [ 2871.070283] sd 11:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg6 type 0 [ 2902.139078] usb 6-1: reset full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 6 [ 2912.414084] usb 6-1: reset full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 6 [ 2928.692104] usb 6-1: reset full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 6 [ 2928.968086] usb 6-1: reset full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 6 TIA rfjones -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: OT: Hard drive warning at boot time
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 6:48 AM, David G. Miller d...@davenjudy.org wrote: Chiming in with some additional information that only *partially* contradicts certain things that have been said in this thread. First off though, the advice that drives are cheap and data is expensive is absolutely correct. Do NOT let anything I say talk you out of making sure any critical data on this drive is backed up. Given that tee-up, smartctl/smartd reports that the disk has an uncorrectable bad sector when there is a read error from the drive for a sector. The error is uncorrectable because the sector cannot be read. Note that the detection of a bad read (or write) takes place at the physical and drive firmware level when the CRC is checked. The only thing that the drive has to work with is that there was an attempt to read a sector and that read resulted in a CRC error. The bad sector is part of a file and only you, the user, can make a determination as to whether the rest of the file is still good or if the bad sector is throwing a CRC error but the file is still usable. That's also why the error is uncorrctable. The drive doesn't have enough information to fix it and it can't silently remap the sector since it can't read the data. If it did, you would end up with a file with a null sector somewhere in it at the location that corresponds to the bad sector's data. Write errors the drive takes care of through the reallocation process mentioned earlier in the thread (since data is being written, any existing data is being replaced so the data can be written to a remapped sector). Read errors the drive can only report the problem since the read error implies that data cannot be retrieved. My advice: buy a new drive but run badblocks -w on the old drive once you have your data safely off of it. You will probably find that the badbloocks write test (-w) lets the drive see the bad sector being written to and then remaps the bad sector and you end up with a drive that is now completely usable again. Be absolutely sure you have your data off of the drive before running badblocks -w. It will overwrite any data on the drive. I have recovered several drives by doing this. I've also had some that threw errors all over the place. Those became targets. Thanks, Dave, for your very clarifying answer. Should I conclude from your words that I have already some corrupted files? If so, is there some way to identify them? Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
No package 'gtk+-2.0' found --- No package 'gtkmm-2.4' found
Hi Guys, Could you please to help me, I installed a libview library on my linux fedora 14. and it produced: No package 'gtk+-2.0' found No package 'gtkmm-2.4' found Thus I tried to download them: [root@localhost libview]# yum install libgtk2.0-dev Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit Adding en_US to language list Setting up Install Process *No package libgtk2.0-dev available.* *Error: Nothing to do* [root@localhost libview]# yum install gtkmm-2.4 Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit Adding en_US to language list Setting up Install Process *No package gtkmm-2.4 available.* *Error: Nothing to do* * * * * How could I get their *rpm files? I will really appreciate for your help. Thank you so much, Cheers, Thomas -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: No package 'gtk+-2.0' found --- No package 'gtkmm-2.4' found
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 17:36:57 +0900, Thomas Tobian wrote: Hi Guys, Could you please to help me, I installed a libview library on my linux fedora 14. and it produced: No package 'gtk+-2.0' found No package 'gtkmm-2.4' found That looks like a reference to pkgconfig files (gtk+-2.0.pc and gtkmm-2.4.pc) not RPM packages. Thus I tried to download them: [root@localhost libview]# yum install libgtk2.0-dev Fedora's packages have never been named like that. GTK+ v2 has never been named libgtk2.0, but gtk2. And the packages for software development end with -devel not -dev. In case of doubt, run queries using Yum or the repoquery tool to find out which packages you need. A bit of experience is needed, of course: $ repoquery --whatprovides \*gtk+-2.0.pc gtk2-devel-0:2.24.19-1.fc19.i686 gtk2-devel-0:2.24.19-1.fc19.x86_64 mingw32-gtk2-0:2.24.19-1.fc19.noarch mingw64-gtk2-0:2.24.19-1.fc19.noarch mingw32-gtk2-0:2.24.18-1.fc19.noarch gtk2-devel-0:2.24.19-1.fc19.i686 gtk2-devel-0:2.24.19-1.fc19.x86_64 mingw64-gtk2-0:2.24.18-1.fc19.noarch $ repoquery --whatprovides \*gtkmm-2.4.pc gtkmm24-devel-0:2.24.2-5.fc19.x86_64 mingw64-gtkmm24-0:2.24.2-8.fc19.noarch gtkmm24-devel-0:2.24.2-5.fc19.i686 mingw32-gtkmm24-0:2.24.2-8.fc19.noarch -- Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat) - Linux 3.9.6-301.fc19.x86_64 loadavg: 0.11 0.13 0.09 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
[no subject]
Dear All, How can I see the total disk size of my hard disk? I have used the following command: # fdisk -l | grep Disk Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors Disk identifier: 0x0003dd50 Disk /dev/mapper/fedora_new--host--5-swap: 6274 MB, 6274678784 bytes, 12255232 sectors Disk /dev/mapper/fedora_new--host--5-root: 53.7 GB, 53687091200 bytes, 104857600 sectors Disk /dev/mapper/fedora_new--host--5-home: 939.7 GB, 939712839680 bytes, 1835376640 sectors # Should I conclude that the size of my hard disk is 1 TB? Thanks in advance, Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
How to find out the size of my computer hard disk?
Dear All, How can I see the total disk size of my hard disk? I have used the following command: # fdisk -l | grep Disk Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors Disk identifier: 0x0003dd50 Disk /dev/mapper/fedora_new--host--5-swap: 6274 MB, 6274678784 bytes, 12255232 sectors Disk /dev/mapper/fedora_new--host--5-root: 53.7 GB, 53687091200 bytes, 104857600 sectors Disk /dev/mapper/fedora_new--host--5-home: 939.7 GB, 939712839680 bytes, 1835376640 sectors # Should I conclude that the size of my hard disk is 1 TB? Thanks in advance, Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to find out the size of my computer hard disk?
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Paul Smith phh...@gmail.com wrote: How can I see the total disk size of my hard disk? I have used the following command: # fdisk -l | grep Disk Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors Disk identifier: 0x0003dd50 Disk /dev/mapper/fedora_new--host--5-swap: 6274 MB, 6274678784 bytes, 12255232 sectors Disk /dev/mapper/fedora_new--host--5-root: 53.7 GB, 53687091200 bytes, 104857600 sectors Disk /dev/mapper/fedora_new--host--5-home: 939.7 GB, 939712839680 bytes, 1835376640 sectors # Should I conclude that the size of my hard disk is 1 TB? And moreover, I would like to know the full specifications of my hard disk. How can one accomplish that? Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to find out the size of my computer hard disk?
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Should I conclude that the size of my hard disk is 1 TB? And moreover, I would like to know the full specifications of my hard disk. How can one accomplish that? [root@srv-rhsoft:/lib/modules]$ smartctl --info --health --attributes /dev/sda Thanks a lot, Reindl! I was pretty convinced that my disk was of 1,5 TB... Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to find out the size of my computer hard disk?
On 06/22/13 19:01, Paul Smith wrote: On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Should I conclude that the size of my hard disk is 1 TB? And moreover, I would like to know the full specifications of my hard disk. How can one accomplish that? [root@srv-rhsoft:/lib/modules]$ smartctl --info --health --attributes /dev/sda Thanks a lot, Reindl! I was pretty convinced that my disk was of 1,5 TB... Of course that doesn't tell you the full specifications. To do that you'll need to do a bit of manually labor by googling the Device Model. Otherwise there isn't a way to know the RPM, cache size, environmental constraints, power consumption, etc. To me, that would mean full specifications :-) -- The only thing worse than a poorly asked question is a cryptic answer. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re:
Hi Paul, Try this page: http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/howto-find-out-or-learn-harddisk-size-in-linux-or-unix/ HTH, Zoltan 2013/6/22 Paul Smith phh...@gmail.com: Dear All, How can I see the total disk size of my hard disk? I have used the following command: # fdisk -l | grep Disk Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors Disk identifier: 0x0003dd50 Disk /dev/mapper/fedora_new--host--5-swap: 6274 MB, 6274678784 bytes, 12255232 sectors Disk /dev/mapper/fedora_new--host--5-root: 53.7 GB, 53687091200 bytes, 104857600 sectors Disk /dev/mapper/fedora_new--host--5-home: 939.7 GB, 939712839680 bytes, 1835376640 sectors # Should I conclude that the size of my hard disk is 1 TB? Thanks in advance, Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- PGP: 06853DF7 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to find out the size of my computer hard disk?
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 11:54:08 +0100 Paul Smith phh...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, How can I see the total disk size of my hard disk? if you want a gui tool: yum install lshw-gui then look for hardware-lister. here's a cp from mine before clicking sub-menus. product: Hitachi HDS72161 vendor: Hitachi bus info: scsi@0:0.0.0 logical name: /dev/sda version: P22O serial: PVE331ZFRE9X0U size: 149GiB (160GB) capabilities: GUID Partition Table version 1.00, Partitioned disk, GUID partition table configuration: ansiversion: 5 guid: 69de2351-2e5f-4bab-b179-2fb997e1c70e sectorsize: 512 -- Regards, Frank When in doubt PANIC! I check for new mail app. 20min www.frankly3d.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re:
Allegedly, on or about 22 June 2013, Paul Smith sent: # fdisk -l | grep Disk Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors ...[snip]... Should I conclude that the size of my hard disk is 1 TB? It says it right there, that /dev/sda (that's a whole disc), is one thousand gigabytes. Which is 1 terabyte, if you're using SI prefixes properly. Do you only have one drive? -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.8.13-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon May 13 13:36:17 UTC 2013 x86_64 All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists. George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to find out the size of my computer hard disk?
On 22.06.2013, Paul Smith wrote: How can I see the total disk size of my hard disk? hdparm -I /dev/sda -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: OT: Hard drive warning at boot time
Allegedly, on or about 21 June 2013, Tom Horsley sent: Just remember what happened when HAL told Dave the AE-35 unit would fail in 24 hours :-). Read the book, it's much more comprehensive than the film (which was shortened, significantly). There's a lot more to that part of the plot than the film conveys. -- All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Performance and the hard disk size
Allegedly, on or about 21 June 2013, Paul Smith sent: They are all MS Windows users, and they say that using a disk larger than 1 T as a boot disk, the performance will be affected. Maybe, that is true with MS Windows and not with Fedora. Well, there's this side of that situation: Have you seen Windows complain at boot up that you hadn't shut down properly, and it needs to check the drive? (Of course you did shut down properly, *it* screwed up doing so.) Then you have the fun of waiting for it to scan through one hell of a huge drive. More so if your computer likes to regularly screw up. Then there's drive fragmentation. Windows still seems to be horrid for that. I'd hate to have to wait for a 2 TB drive to defrag. Even if I wasn't watching the box, waiting for it to finish, because I wanted to use it, but left it overnight - it'd be at it all night. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.8.13-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon May 13 13:36:17 UTC 2013 x86_64 All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists. George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to find out the size of my computer hard disk?
On 06/22/2013 02:05 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote: On 22.06.2013, Paul Smith wrote: How can I see the total disk size of my hard disk? hdparm -I /dev/sda Or cfdisk /dev/sda -- Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat): Kernel-3.9.6-301.fc19.x86_64 Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Working twitter client
My preferred twitter client choqok doesn't work at the moment because it has not been updated to support the new authentication method that twitter now insists upon. I have tried the others listed by a yum search twitter command and can't get any of them to authenticate either. Is anyone currently using a working twitter client? I don't like the browser page - I want my feed updating automatically. Thanks Steve -- Play Champions - my free football predictions game at: http://www.stevesearle.com/champs/about.html 15:24:29 up 29 days, 18:44, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.06, 0.02 pgpGY3ZNEdwvt.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do I install the Wireless USB with Ralink 3070 (RT3070) Chipset?
Anybody? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 8:44 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: On 06/13/13 19:58, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: Just posted this question to Fedora ASK page: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/question/26799/how-do-i-install-the-wireless-usb-with-ralink-3070-rt3070-chipset/ I also reported this as a bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974072 How should I report this to upstream kernel developers? On my F18 my USB WiFi adapter works just fine [egreshko@meimei ~]$ lsusb -d 0411:015d Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0411:015d BUFFALO INC. (formerly MelCo., Inc.) WLI-UC-GN Wireless LAN Adapter [Ralink RT3070] - Device: wlan0 [misty-net] --- Type: 802.11 WiFi Driver:rt2800usb State: connected Default: no HW Address:00:24:A5:50:70:B2 Capabilities: Speed: 48 Mb/s Wireless Properties WEP Encryption: yes WPA Encryption: yes WPA2 Encryption: yes That is odd... it doesn't on mine... but be have different devices, please send your dmesg log. lsusb: Bus 002 Device 004: ID 148f:3070 Ralink Technology, Corp. RT2870/RT3070 Wireless Adapter dmesg: [ 76.583036] usb 2-2: new high-speed USB device number 4 using ehci-pci [ 76.717649] usb 2-2: New USB device found, idVendor=148f, idProduct=3070 [ 76.717655] usb 2-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 [ 76.717658] usb 2-2: Product: 802.11 n WLAN [ 76.717660] usb 2-2: Manufacturer: Ralink [ 76.717662] usb 2-2: SerialNumber: 1.0 [ 76.791246] cfg80211: Calling CRDA to update world regulatory domain [ 76.811737] cfg80211: World regulatory domain updated: [ 76.811743] cfg80211: (start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, max_eirp) [ 76.811746] cfg80211: (2402000 KHz - 2472000 KHz @ 4 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) [ 76.811748] cfg80211: (2457000 KHz - 2482000 KHz @ 4 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) [ 76.811749] cfg80211: (2474000 KHz - 2494000 KHz @ 2 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) [ 76.811751] cfg80211: (517 KHz - 525 KHz @ 4 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) [ 76.811753] cfg80211: (5735000 KHz - 5835000 KHz @ 4 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) [ 76.943039] usb 2-2: reset high-speed USB device number 4 using ehci-pci [ 77.086274] phy0 - rt2x00_set_chip: Info - Chipset detected - rt: 5390, rf: 3070, rev: 0502. [ 77.086280] phy0 - rt2800_init_eeprom: Error - Invalid RF chipset 0x3070 detected. [ 77.086282] phy0 - rt2x00lib_probe_dev: Error - Failed to allocate device. [ 77.087703] usbcore: registered new interface driver rt2800usb uname -a: Linux blackbox.lan 3.9.4-200.fc18.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri May 24 20:10:49 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- follow me - www.twitter.com/valentt http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com linux, anime, spirituality, wireless, scuba, linuxmce smart home, zwave ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: valent.turko...@hotmail.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1 fails to start after F17-F18 update
Hi,
I just updated a server machine from F17 to F18. This server is
running a local VNC session which I connect to via SSH. It's using
an XFCE4 desktop environment.
The machine is running a lot of virtual machines and so far there
was a virt-manager instance running in the VNC desktop.
After the upgrade to F18, virt-manager no longer starts:
Unable to connect to libvirt.
authentication failed: polkit: Authorization requires authentication
but no agent is available.
So I checked and, yes, there's actually no agent running, there's no
polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1 process, as usual.
In the XFCE4 Session settings, starting the PolicyKit Authentication
Agent is activated. But polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1 simply
doesn't start. When I try to start it from the command line, I only
get an error message:
$ /usr/libexec/polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1
(polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:5772): polkit-gnome-1-WARNING **:
Unable to determine the session we are in: No session for pid 5772
I know next to nothing about polkit. To get virt-manager working I added
a rule once:
$ cat /etc/polkit-1/rules.d/80-libvirt-manage.rules
polkit.addRule(function(action, subject) {
if (action.id == org.libvirt.unix.manage
subject.active
subject.isInGroup(libvirt)) {
return polkit.Result.YES;
}
})
but that is taken from information on the net, and it obviously can't
help when there's no agent running.
So, how can I fix this? How can I make polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1
start in my VNC XFCE4 session again?
Thanks for any help,
Corinna
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Working twitter client
Sure, you can try turpial, gwibber all of it one yum away. Zoltan 2013/6/22 Steve Searle st...@stevesearle.com: My preferred twitter client choqok doesn't work at the moment because it has not been updated to support the new authentication method that twitter now insists upon. I have tried the others listed by a yum search twitter command and can't get any of them to authenticate either. Is anyone currently using a working twitter client? I don't like the browser page - I want my feed updating automatically. Thanks Steve -- Play Champions - my free football predictions game at: http://www.stevesearle.com/champs/about.html 15:24:29 up 29 days, 18:44, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.06, 0.02 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- PGP: 06853DF7 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Working twitter client
On Saturday 22 Jun 2013 15:27:19 Steve Searle wrote: My preferred twitter client choqok doesn't work at the moment because it has not been updated to support the new authentication method that twitter now insists upon. I have tried the others listed by a yum search twitter command and can't get any of them to authenticate either. Is anyone currently using a working twitter client? I don't like the browser page - I want my feed updating automatically. This maybe of some use: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264091 I am currently running Choqok from there dev branch and it is working well. HTH Colin -- Fedora 19 (Schrödinger's Cat) Registered Linux user number #342953 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: OT: Hard drive warning at boot time
Paul Smith phhs80 at gmail.com writes: On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 6:48 AM, David G. Miller dave at davenjudy.org wrote: Chiming in with some additional information that only *partially* contradicts certain things that have been said in this thread. First off though, the advice that drives are cheap and data is expensive is absolutely correct. Do NOT let anything I say talk you out of making sure any critical data on this drive is backed up. SNIP. Thanks, Dave, for your very clarifying answer. Should I conclude from your words that I have already some corrupted files? If so, is there some way to identify them? Paul Paul - Finding the files that may have been corrupted by a block going bad is a fairly long and involved process described here: http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/badblockhowto.html For almost anything other than text files, finding the file that has a corrupted block doesn't do you any good unless you have a backup copy. But, if you don't, at least you know which file is probably not usable anymore. For any installed application or OS files, you can always just re-install the package. Cheers, Dave -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do I install the Wireless USB with Ralink 3070 (RT3070) Chipset?
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 16:27:29 +0200 valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: Anybody? linuxwireless.org is the place to go for all linux wireless info (unfortunately, the web site is more confusing than a Windows 8 tablet :-). I found this page: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/rt2800usb which may cryptically imply you need a special firmware module to get it going (which probably isn't shipped by fedora because it isn't open source). It is the how do I use this part though where the web site becomes hopeless. I certainly have no idea. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Working twitter client
On Saturday 22 Jun 2013 15:27:19 Steve Searle wrote: My preferred twitter client choqok doesn't work at the moment because it has not been updated to support the new authentication method that twitter now insists upon. I have tried the others listed by a yum search twitter command and can't get any of them to authenticate either. Is anyone currently using a working twitter client? I don't like the browser page - I want my feed updating automatically. Thanks Steve Tweetdeck works quite well, as an addon for chrome you can run it standalone, or you can just login to the website with firefox or any other browser. there used to be an adobe AIR version,but unfortunately it was discontinued :( Martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1 fails to start after F17-F18 update
On Jun 22 16:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Hi, I just updated a server machine from F17 to F18. This server is running a local VNC session which I connect to via SSH. It's using an XFCE4 desktop environment. The machine is running a lot of virtual machines and so far there was a virt-manager instance running in the VNC desktop. After the upgrade to F18, virt-manager no longer starts: Unable to connect to libvirt. authentication failed: polkit: Authorization requires authentication but no agent is available. So I checked and, yes, there's actually no agent running, there's no polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1 process, as usual. In the XFCE4 Session settings, starting the PolicyKit Authentication Agent is activated. But polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1 simply doesn't start. When I try to start it from the command line, I only get an error message: $ /usr/libexec/polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1 (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:5772): polkit-gnome-1-WARNING **: Unable to determine the session we are in: No session for pid 5772 The same message is in the vncserver log file, btw. I'm starting the XFCE4 desktop via `exec startxfce4 --with-ck-launch' and ck-launch-session starts and runs. What else can I do?!? Thanks for any help, Corinna -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Working twitter client
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 15:27:19 PM +0100, Steve Searle wrote: My preferred twitter client choqok doesn't work at the moment because it has not been updated to support the new authentication method that twitter now insists upon. I have tried the others listed by a yum search twitter command and can't get any of them to authenticate either. Very interesting coincidence. Can't help you unfortunately, just confirming that exactly the same thing happened to me this morning. On Fedora 17 x86_64, in case it matters. So I second your request! Marco -- M. Fioretti http://mfioretti.com http://stop.zona-m.net Your own civil rights and the quality of your life heavily depend on how software is used *around* you -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do I install the Wireless USB with Ralink 3070 (RT3070) Chipset?
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 16:27 +0200, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: Anybody? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 8:44 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: On 06/13/13 19:58, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: Just posted this question to Fedora ASK page: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/question/26799/how-do-i-install-the-wireless-usb-with-ralink-3070-rt3070-chipset/ I also reported this as a bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974072 How should I report this to upstream kernel developers? On my F18 my USB WiFi adapter works just fine [egreshko@meimei ~]$ lsusb -d 0411:015d Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0411:015d BUFFALO INC. (formerly MelCo., Inc.) WLI-UC-GN Wireless LAN Adapter [Ralink RT3070] - Device: wlan0 [misty-net] --- Type: 802.11 WiFi Driver:rt2800usb State: connected Default: no HW Address:00:24:A5:50:70:B2 Capabilities: Speed: 48 Mb/s Wireless Properties WEP Encryption: yes WPA Encryption: yes WPA2 Encryption: yes That is odd... it doesn't on mine... but be have different devices, please send your dmesg log. lsusb: Bus 002 Device 004: ID 148f:3070 Ralink Technology, Corp. RT2870/RT3070 Wireless Adapter dmesg: [ 76.583036] usb 2-2: new high-speed USB device number 4 using ehci-pci [ 76.717649] usb 2-2: New USB device found, idVendor=148f, idProduct=3070 [ 76.717655] usb 2-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 [ 76.717658] usb 2-2: Product: 802.11 n WLAN [ 76.717660] usb 2-2: Manufacturer: Ralink [ 76.717662] usb 2-2: SerialNumber: 1.0 [ 76.791246] cfg80211: Calling CRDA to update world regulatory domain [ 76.811737] cfg80211: World regulatory domain updated: [ 76.811743] cfg80211: (start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, max_eirp) [ 76.811746] cfg80211: (2402000 KHz - 2472000 KHz @ 4 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) [ 76.811748] cfg80211: (2457000 KHz - 2482000 KHz @ 4 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) [ 76.811749] cfg80211: (2474000 KHz - 2494000 KHz @ 2 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) [ 76.811751] cfg80211: (517 KHz - 525 KHz @ 4 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) [ 76.811753] cfg80211: (5735000 KHz - 5835000 KHz @ 4 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) [ 76.943039] usb 2-2: reset high-speed USB device number 4 using ehci-pci [ 77.086274] phy0 - rt2x00_set_chip: Info - Chipset detected - rt: 5390, rf: 3070, rev: 0502. [ 77.086280] phy0 - rt2800_init_eeprom: Error - Invalid RF chipset 0x3070 detected. [ 77.086282] phy0 - rt2x00lib_probe_dev: Error - Failed to allocate device. [ 77.087703] usbcore: registered new interface driver rt2800usb uname -a: Linux blackbox.lan 3.9.4-200.fc18.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri May 24 20:10:49 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- follow me - www.twitter.com/valentt http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com linux, anime, spirituality, wireless, scuba, linuxmce smart home, zwave ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: valent.turko...@hotmail.com Do you have the firmware installed? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Working twitter client
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 16:36:12 PM +0200, Zoltan Hoppar wrote: Sure, you can try turpial, gwibber all of it one yum away. didn't you read Steve's reply and mine too? We did use yum. Turpial etc all have the same problem. Marco -- M. Fioretti http://mfioretti.com http://stop.zona-m.net Your own civil rights and the quality of your life heavily depend on how software is used *around* you -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: OT: Hard drive warning at boot time
On 06/22/2013 05:12 AM, Tim wrote: Allegedly, on or about 21 June 2013, Tom Horsley sent: Just remember what happened when HAL told Dave the AE-35 unit would fail in 24 hours :-). Read the book, it's much more comprehensive than the film (which was shortened, significantly). There's a lot more to that part of the plot than the film conveys. ROTFLMAO! The film was based on a short story, *The Sentinal,* By Arthur C. Clark, who later wrote a novel *based on* the film. Naturally, in that novelization, he had room to add considerable back-story and detail that wasn't in the film. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Working twitter client
Around 03:37pm on Saturday, June 22, 2013 (UK time), Colin J Thomson scrawled: I am currently running Choqok from there dev branch and it is working well. I followed your advice, downloaded the source and after a bit of fiddling around managed to build it and it is working again. I am blogging the details of how I managed it, and will post a link to this when I have done it. Cheers Steve -- Play Champions - my free football predictions game at: http://www.stevesearle.com/champs/about.html 16:32:53 up 29 days, 19:52, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.00 pgpSqBXjWxmjm.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do I install the Wireless USB with Ralink 3070 (RT3070) Chipset?
On 22.06.2013 16:27, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: Anybody? So, did you apply this one, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974072#c8? http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/MailingLists#Stats_and_requirements_of_linux-wireless_mailing_list poma -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: HDD size
On 22.06.2013 12:52, Paul Smith wrote: Dear All, How can I see the total disk size of my hard disk? … HDD label? :) poma -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: OT: Hard drive warning at boot time
Tim: Read the book, it's much more comprehensive than the film (which was shortened, significantly). There's a lot more to that part of the plot than the film conveys. Joe Zeff: ROTFLMAO! The film was based on a short story, *The Sentinal,* By Arthur C. Clark, I know, and there's several quite similar stories. Like a lot of authors, he seemed to do several variations on a theme. who later wrote a novel *based on* the film. Supposedly, the film and the novel were worked on concurrently. Naturally, in that novelization, he had room to add considerable back-story and detail that wasn't in the film. Supposedly, the first cut of the film was many hours long. It's one of my favourites, but I have to be in a fairly lethargic mood to sit still and watch it uninterrupted. -- All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists. George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: OT: Hard drive warning at boot time
On 22.06.2013 17:26, Joe Zeff wrote: On 06/22/2013 05:12 AM, Tim wrote: Allegedly, on or about 21 June 2013, Tom Horsley sent: Just remember what happened when HAL told Dave the AE-35 unit would fail in 24 hours :-). Read the book, it's much more comprehensive than the film (which was shortened, significantly). There's a lot more to that part of the plot than the film conveys. ROTFLMAO! The film was based on a short story, *The Sentinal,* By Arthur C. Clark, who later wrote a novel *based on* the film. Naturally, in that novelization, he had room to add considerable back-story and detail that wasn't in the film. Partially based. :) poma -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: OT: Hard drive warning at boot time
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 08:26:37AM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: On 06/22/2013 05:12 AM, Tim wrote: Allegedly, on or about 21 June 2013, Tom Horsley sent: Just remember what happened when HAL told Dave the AE-35 unit would fail in 24 hours :-). Read the book, it's much more comprehensive than the film (which was shortened, significantly). There's a lot more to that part of the plot than the film conveys. ROTFLMAO! The film was based on a short story, *The Sentinal,* By Arthur C. Clark, who later wrote a novel *based on* the film. Naturally, in that novelization, he had room to add considerable back-story and detail that wasn't in the film. It's been ages since I've read the book, but my recollection is that ACC wrote the book more or less in parallel with the movie, and that Kubrick took liberties therewith. -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - The Lord detests the way of the wicked but he loves those who pursue righteousness. - Proverbs 15:9 (niv) - -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Working twitter client
Hi On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Steve Searle st...@stevesearle.comwrote: My preferred twitter client choqok doesn't work at the moment because it has not been updated to support the new authentication method that twitter now insists upon. I have tried the others listed by a yum search twitter command and can't get any of them to authenticate either. Is anyone currently using a working twitter client? I don't like the browser page - I want my feed updating automatically. I pushed an update for Hotot that gets Twitter working again. You can get it from the updates-testing repo yum --enablerepo=updaes-testing install hotot-gtk or hotot-qt https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/hotot Rahul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: OT: Hard drive warning at boot time
Paul Smith phh...@gmail.com writes: 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 013 013 036Pre-fail Always FAILING_NOW 3587 What the other respondents missed is that this is the *reallocated* sector count. It is a count of the sectors that have already been replaced by spares. There are no unreadable files currently. The replacement only happens on writes, so you are probably seeing freshly written, pristine files. As to the haste you should replace the disk with, that all depends on how the sectors got trashed in the first place. If you moved the computer while it was up and writing to the disk the arm could have been jiggled onto the next track during the write. I know that happens with 3-1/2 drives. I was seeing an ever increasing reallocated sectors on my desktop machine until I traced the lossage back to me tilting the case forward in order to get easier access to the connectors on the back. Another computer, my laptop has had 6 reallocated sectors since the first few weeks after I got it. That was 7+ years ago. The disk is still going strong with no increase in reallocated sector count (or pending reallocation sector count) in all those years. Stable reallocated counts shouldn't bother you too much. It is when they go up that you should be concerned. On the other hand, I do nightly rsync backups to a spare disk. According to google, which probably has more disks that the NSA, only half of the disk drive deaths are preceded by smartmon saying anything. -wolfgang -- g+: https://plus.google.com/114566345864337108516/about -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Working twitter client
Around 04:34pm on Saturday, June 22, 2013 (UK time), Steve Searle scrawled: Around 03:37pm on Saturday, June 22, 2013 (UK time), Colin J Thomson scrawled: I am currently running Choqok from there dev branch and it is working well. I followed your advice, downloaded the source and after a bit of fiddling around managed to build it and it is working again. I am blogging the details of how I managed it, and will post a link to this when I have done it. Here are my notes on how I built a working choqok - http://reddishshift.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/building-choqok.html Steve -- Play Champions - my free football predictions game at: http://www.stevesearle.com/champs/about.html 00:26:53 up 30 days, 3:46, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00 pgpwlbVnvOJuM.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: mcelog.service
Joe Zeff j...@zeff.us writes: On 06/21/2013 09:19 PM, lee wrote: And how would I disable it? Mdmonitor is stopped and disabled, and md is still running. systemctl stop SERVICENAME.service systemctl mask SERVICENAME.service Thank you, that would work if there was a service called md, but there isn't. -- Fedora 18 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: mcelog.service
On 06/22/2013 06:49 PM, lee wrote: Joe Zeff j...@zeff.us writes: On 06/21/2013 09:19 PM, lee wrote: And how would I disable it? Mdmonitor is stopped and disabled, and md is still running. systemctl stop SERVICENAME.service systemctl mask SERVICENAME.service Thank you, that would work if there was a service called md, but there isn't. Try this, then: systemctl list-unit-files | grep mdmonitor When I did it, I learned that unlike you, I do have mdmonitor.service active. And, a search of fedoraforum.org revealed that there's also mdmonitor-takeover.service which might or might not be running. (I don't have it.) And, there might be others which neither of us has thought of, which is why I made the grep pattern as generic as seemed reasonable. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Analyzing system shutdown
Is there an equivalent of systemd-analyze for system shutdown processes. Something on a couple of my machines takes about 20 seconds to wind down, during a reboot or a shutdown, and I'd like to figure out what it is. pgp9jm9cJoDYu.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How can I see the total disk size of my hard disk?
the next time please use a subject for your message! Am 22.06.2013 12:52, schrieb Paul Smith: How can I see the total disk size of my hard disk? I have used the following command: # fdisk -l | grep Disk Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors Disk identifier: 0x0003dd50 Disk /dev/mapper/fedora_new--host--5-swap: 6274 MB, 6274678784 bytes, 12255232 sectors Disk /dev/mapper/fedora_new--host--5-root: 53.7 GB, 53687091200 bytes, 104857600 sectors Disk /dev/mapper/fedora_new--host--5-home: 939.7 GB, 939712839680 bytes, 1835376640 sectors Should I conclude that the size of my hard disk is 1 TB? there is not much to conclude since the first line of the fdisk output says clear Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB which is 1 TB signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to find out the size of my computer hard disk?
Am 22.06.2013 12:55, schrieb Paul Smith: Should I conclude that the size of my hard disk is 1 TB? And moreover, I would like to know the full specifications of my hard disk. How can one accomplish that? [root@srv-rhsoft:/lib/modules]$ smartctl --info --health --attributes /dev/sda smartctl 6.1 2013-03-16 r3800 [x86_64-linux-3.9.7-200.fc18.x86_64] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-13, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Model Family: Seagate Constellation ES (SATA 6Gb/s) Device Model: ST2000NM0011 Serial Number:Z1P099YL LU WWN Device Id: 5 000c50 035f56f7c Firmware Version: SN02 User Capacity:2.000.398.934.016 bytes [2,00 TB] Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical Rotation Rate:7202 rpm Device is:In smartctl database [for details use: -P show] ATA Version is: ATA8-ACS T13/1699-D revision 4 SATA Version is: SATA 3.0, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 6.0 Gb/s) Local Time is:Sat Jun 22 12:58:12 2013 CEST SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. SMART support is: Enabled === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 10 Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 080 063 044Pre-fail Always - 102299621 3 Spin_Up_Time0x0003 092 091 000Pre-fail Always - 0 4 Start_Stop_Count0x0032 100 100 020Old_age Always - 55 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 036Pre-fail Always - 8 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f 085 060 030Pre-fail Always - 368697483 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 083 083 000Old_age Always - 14963 10 Spin_Retry_Count0x0013 100 100 097Pre-fail Always - 0 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 020Old_age Always - 55 184 End-to-End_Error0x0032 100 100 099Old_age Always - 0 187 Reported_Uncorrect 0x0032 100 100 000Old_age Always - 0 188 Command_Timeout 0x0032 100 100 000Old_age Always - 0 189 High_Fly_Writes 0x003a 100 100 000Old_age Always - 0 190 Airflow_Temperature_Cel 0x0022 058 047 045Old_age Always - 42 (Min/Max 35/44) 191 G-Sense_Error_Rate 0x0032 100 100 000Old_age Always - 30 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 100 100 000Old_age Always - 28 193 Load_Cycle_Count0x0032 100 100 000Old_age Always - 55 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 042 053 000Old_age Always - 42 (0 21 0 0 0) 195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered 0x001a 116 099 000Old_age Always - 102299621 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 100 100 000Old_age Always - 0 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0010 100 100 000Old_age Offline - 0 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count0x003e 200 200 000Old_age Always - 0 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Performance and the hard disk size
Am 22.06.2013 14:18, schrieb Tim: Allegedly, on or about 21 June 2013, Paul Smith sent: They are all MS Windows users, and they say that using a disk larger than 1 T as a boot disk, the performance will be affected. Maybe, that is true with MS Windows and not with Fedora. Have you seen Windows complain at boot up that you hadn't shut down properly, and it needs to check the drive? (Of course you did shut down properly, *it* screwed up doing so.) Then you have the fun of waiting for it to scan through one hell of a huge drive. More so if your computer likes to regularly screw up. which does typically not happen Then there's drive fragmentation. Windows still seems to be horrid for that. I'd hate to have to wait for a 2 TB drive to defrag. Even if I wasn't watching the box, waiting for it to finish, because I wanted to use it, but left it overnight - it'd be at it all night which has nothing to do with *a disk* larger than 1 TB it's more depending on the partitions you create in context of Linux it doe snot matter at all signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
