Re: Brother HL-5250DN duplex printing: loves me, loves me not, ...
On 05/20/14 14:05, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 05/20/14 12:57, Michael Hannon wrote: >> and it *does* have the duplex printing option enabled: >> >> Double-sided printing: Long Edge (standard) > > Sorry for the gratuitous trimming Just wanted to share my experience > which probably doesn't fix your situation but may trigger others to think > what may. > > I had much the opposite situation. I have an HP 6500 with duplex capability. > It is configured in CUPS as "installed" and the default is set to " > Double-Sided Printing: off". Yet every time I printed I would get > double-sided print-outs. In checking the print options for each application > I was using the Double-sided option was selected. In order to get > single-sided, I always had to manually revert it within all of the > applications. > > Ultimately, I ran "hp-toolbox" (which isn't applicable to you) and set the > default there After that, each application did pick up the default > single sided. So, it seems, settings are held in multiple places and I'm not > certain where all the places are and which location has priority. > > Anyway. Just wondering, when you print from an application, if you > checked to see what printer options are being used. FWIW, this got to me thinking and I found where the per-user options are set. ~/.cups/lpoptions Duplex=DuplexNoTumble is set for a printer where the default should be Double-sided printing: Long Edge -- Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong. -- Dandemis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Brother HL-5250DN duplex printing: loves me, loves me not, ...
On 05/20/14 12:57, Michael Hannon wrote: > and it *does* have the duplex printing option enabled: > > Double-sided printing: Long Edge (standard) Sorry for the gratuitous trimming Just wanted to share my experience which probably doesn't fix your situation but may trigger others to think what may. I had much the opposite situation. I have an HP 6500 with duplex capability. It is configured in CUPS as "installed" and the default is set to " Double-Sided Printing: off". Yet every time I printed I would get double-sided print-outs. In checking the print options for each application I was using the Double-sided option was selected. In order to get single-sided, I always had to manually revert it within all of the applications. Ultimately, I ran "hp-toolbox" (which isn't applicable to you) and set the default there After that, each application did pick up the default single sided. So, it seems, settings are held in multiple places and I'm not certain where all the places are and which location has priority. Anyway. Just wondering, when you print from an application, if you checked to see what printer options are being used. -- Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong. -- Dandemis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Brother HL-5250DN duplex printing: loves me, loves me not, ...
Greetings. I've got a brother HL-5250DN printer on my local network, and it is *currently* not doing duplex printing under Fedora 20. I've seen discussions of a similar problem in various places. The responses to the problem seem to fall into several categories: (1) Duplex printing must be *enabled* on the printer before it will print duplex. (2) Some printers are not well-supported under linux. You should check the Open Printing database (or similar). (3) Get the printer driver from Brother. Regarding (1), the duplex option *is* enabled on the printer, and it *does* print in duplex from Windows and Mac systems (and others -- see below). Regarding (2), the printer printed in duplex just fine through various versions of Fedora, up through Fedora 18 (the last version I had installed prior to Fedora 20). Furthermore, it prints duplex just fine from an Ubuntu 14.04 system that I have running in VirtualBox on my Fedora machine. In all cases the duplex printing capability happened without my having to expend any brain power at all on the issue: it "just worked". Regarding (3), I've tried that, but it didn't appear to help. So far as I can tell, my problems are pretty similar to those reported by other people. One possibly novel thing: I noticed, without paying close attention, that some of the recent updates to Fedora 20 have been CUPS-related. That motivated me to roll the dice and try duplex printing again. And shazam! It worked! If that were the end of the story, I wouldn't bother to tell it. The printer once again does *not* print duplex. I'm assuming that the problem must have been fixed by one CUPS-related upgrade and broken again by a later one. Here are the candidates: # rpm -qa --last | grep -i cups cups-filters-1.0.53-2.fc20.x86_64 Thu 15 May 2014 11:48:18 AM PDT cups-filters-libs-1.0.53-2.fc20.x86_64Thu 15 May 2014 11:48:15 AM PDT bluez-cups-5.18-1.fc20.x86_64 Fri 02 May 2014 12:18:41 PM PDT cups-1.7.2-1.fc20.x86_64 Wed 30 Apr 2014 11:41:06 AM PDT cups-libs-1.7.2-1.fc20.x86_64 Wed 30 Apr 2014 11:40:45 AM PDT cups-filesystem-1.7.2-1.fc20.noarch Wed 30 Apr 2014 11:40:45 AM PDT python-cups-1.9.65-1.fc20.x86_64 Sat 15 Mar 2014 03:09:34 PM PDT gutenprint-cups-5.2.9-14.fc20.x86_64 Mon 23 Dec 2013 11:23:50 PM PST cups-pk-helper-0.2.5-2.fc20.x86_64Mon 23 Dec 2013 11:08:33 PM PST Unfortunately, as I said, I wasn't paying close attention to the timing of the not-work/work/not-work cycle, so I can't shed any more light on the problem. If you can, I'd love to hear from you. BTW, the driver I'm using is: Brother HL-5250DN Foomatic/Postscript and it *does* have the duplex printing option enabled: Double-sided printing: Long Edge (standard) Thanks. -- Mike -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So has anyone gotten their sound to work since it broke a few days ago?
On Mon, 19 May 2014 20:50:02 -0700 David Benfell wrote: > In a number of distributions over a period spanning many years, removing > pulseaudio has been a first, and all too often entirely successful, means > of getting sound working. My most fun with pulse was a few months ago when sound suddenly stopped working on a random subset of applications. I eventually discovered that for (as yet undetermined reasons) pulse had decided to send the sound from some apps to different sound devices than the default (hdmi) I had set. My motherboard looks to the OS like it has two sound "cards". After setting the profile for the 2nd card to "none" pulse finally started sending everything to the hdmi port again. I don't know if some lunatic decided to implement "load balancing" among multiple sound cards or it was just a wild bug of some kind that came in some update, but it was very mysterious for a while. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So has anyone gotten their sound to work since it broke a few days ago?
Erik P. Olsen writes: On 20/05/14 03:03, Someone wrote: So what steps could one take to try removing pulseaudio? Just "sudo yum remove pulseaudio"? Thanks Looking back through my logwatch that seems to be what I did. In a number of distributions over a period spanning many years, removing pulseaudio has been a first, and all too often entirely successful, means of getting sound working. Pulseaudio would be exhibit A in a counterargument to a claim that "all the distributions are doing it." I think it is possible for distributions to get Pulseaudio right. Sabayon and Linux Mint seem, in my experience, to be two that have done so. But even so, unless you have a specialized need for Pulseaudio, which apparently may include very high-end audiophile applications, removing it seems generally harmless. -- David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you do not understand the attachment. pgpKvjjYVUf7h.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: update grub2
On May 18, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: > On 05/18/2014 11:57 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> On Sun, 18 May 2014 14:57:14 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> After an update of teh kernel. the file: >>> /boot/grub2/grub.cfg is updated. >>> However thsi file is not update properly. >> How? In which way is it not updated "properly"? >> >> Prior to installing a new kernel, you could save a copy of grub.cfg, >> install a new kernel package, and then run diff on the old and new >> grub.cfg. What do you get? >> >>> If I run: >>> grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg >>> then the file is OK. >> Define "OK". >> >> grub2-mkconfig rewrites grub.cfg from scratch and under consideration >> of template files, such as those in /etc/grub.d, and add-on tools such >> as os-prober. >> >> On the contrary, grubby (as run via the kernel packages) only inserts >> a new boot entry into the existing file. It does not recreate the file >> completely. > Hi Michael, >My experience with grubby being run after kernel installs, when I have > been able to get it to run, is that it does recreate the entire grub.cfg > file. For example, I have been in the situation where the boot menu had an > entry for the latest kernel followed by an group entry for 'Advanced Fedora > Options' (or something similar) along with the same structure for Ubuntu, > then after running grubby, the groupings were removed and all the entries > that were listed in the groups were moved to the top level. It definitely doesn't recreate the entire file. It does have the ability to add and remove certain entries, and I've experienced the same thing you've described, but it's not easy to reproduce the conditions. The solution employed on Fedora a while ago was disabling grub submenus by default. I think it's an amusing workaround because ostensibly the idea of grubby is to avoid throwing away data in the grub.cfg that represents the current bootable states of a system, and yet here's an example where it does exactly that. Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: UEFI Big Drive question
On May 18, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: >> > Hi Chris, >I read an article in a computer magazine that actually said that Fedora > was buying a certificate from Microsoft but Canonical were going down the > path is self signing rather than purchase the certificate from Microsoft. The > same article also said that under UEFI all drivers would have the be signed > in order for devices to be used, and quoted the most critical device impacted > by this requirement as the graphics card. The article also said that in order > to implement the verification UEFI used a database of signatures that were > embedded into the firmware. Given your information it appears as though the > writer of the article potentially had no idea what they were talking about. Unsurprising. >The issue I had with my graphics card was, having installed windows, > Fedora and Ubuntu from legacy mode in the firmware, I turned UEFI on to test > functionality and had booting fail before even getting to the Fedora grub2 > boot menu with a message that my graphics card was not supported, so I had to > switch back to legacy mode to be able to use my pc. OS installs are either UEFI or BIOS based. They aren't interchangeable, so they break if you change the firmware mode setting after installation. But, there are some UEFI implementation where the boot mode is store in NVRAM along with the boot entry. So, we're really deep in the weeds where everyone's going to have different experiences because of highly variable firmware behavior, and even UI. Windows -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So has anyone gotten their sound to work since it broke a few days ago?
On 05/19/2014 08:03 PM, Someone wrote: So what steps could one take to try removing pulseaudio? Just "sudo yum remove pulseaudio"? Thanks Your syntax is correct. You might also remove alsa-plugins-pulseaudio David -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So has anyone gotten their sound to work since it broke a few days ago?
On 20/05/14 03:03, Someone wrote: So what steps could one take to try removing pulseaudio? Just "sudo yum remove pulseaudio"? Thanks Looking back through my logwatch that seems to be what I did. -- Erik -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So has anyone gotten their sound to work since it broke a few days ago?
So what steps could one take to try removing pulseaudio? Just "sudo yum remove pulseaudio"? Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: update grub2
On 05/19/2014 08:42 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Mon, 19 May 2014 08:08:54 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote: My experience with grubby being run after kernel installs, when I have been able to get it to run, is that it does recreate the entire grub.cfg file. For example, I have been in the situation where the boot menu had an entry for the latest kernel followed by an group entry for 'Advanced Fedora Options' (or something similar) along with the same structure for Ubuntu, then after running grubby, the groupings were removed and all the entries that were listed in the groups were moved to the top level. Can't confirm. These are the steps I've tested with on Fedora 20: 1) In /etc/default/grub I've set GRUB_DISABLE_SUBMENU=false 2) I've run "grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg" to create the grub.cfg with submenus. 3) I've saved grub.cfg as ~/grub.cfg.MKCONFIG 4) I've run "yum --enablerepo=rawhide install kernel" to add the kernel package from Rawhide. 5) I've run "diff -u ~/grub.cfg.MKCONFIG /boot/grub2/grub.cfg" to display the differences. What has changed in grub.cfg? * a new "menuentry" block for the new kernel at the top * removed trailing whitespace at the end of "linux" lines * replaced double-quote characters with single-quotes in menuentry blocks Upon "yum history undo …" only the added menuentry block was removed again. Looks like grubby has changed since the last time I used it, it is now creating sub-entries as well. I'll need to now check if I still get the same problem on kernel updates where grubby fails with an authorization failure even though the update process is run under sudo, but when I run grubby manually under sudo it runs fine. regards, Steve <>-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So has anyone gotten their sound to work since it broke a few days ago?
On 05/19/2014 10:07 AM, Erik P. Olsen issued this missive: On 19/05/14 18:04, Someone wrote: How would I go about finding my model of motherboard? Try running "dmidecode | more" as root. The first few screens should show what motherboard you're running. Some examples: Handle 0x0200, DMI type 2, 8 bytes Base Board Information Manufacturer: Dell Inc. Product Name: 0TP412 Version: Serial Number: ..CN708217C420Y3. Handle 0x0002, DMI type 2, 15 bytes Base Board Information Manufacturer: MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD Product Name: 785GTM-E45 (MS-7549) Version: 1.0 Serial Number: To be filled by O.E.M. Asset Tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. Features: Board is a hosting board Board is replaceable Location In Chassis: To Be Filled By O.E.M. Chassis Handle: 0x0003 Type: Motherboard Contained Object Handles: 0 -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - Fear is finding a ".vbs" script in your Inbox- -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Sending email to my local server
I can add, make sure any firewall has permission to accept email traffic. On May 19, 2014 9:44 AM, "Rick Stevens" wrote: > On 05/18/2014 05:06 PM, Timothy Murphy issued this missive: > >> I'm trying to send email from my Fedora-20/KDE laptop "rose" >> to my CentOS-6.5 local home server "grover" >> (in order to run a SpamAssassin test), >> but I am finding this surprisingly difficult. >> >> I've tried with KMail and mail, >> sending email to "tim@grover", "tim@grover.localdomain", >> and various other combinations, but all fail with "recipient rejected". >> And telnet gives >>[tim@rose ~]$ telnet 192.168.2.5 25 >>Trying 192.168.2.5... >>telnet: connect to address 192.168.2.5: Connection refused >> >> Is there a setting I could change, or is the exercise hopeless? >> > > Are you certain that grover is running an MTA and that it's listening > to anything other than 127.0.0.1? Easiest way to find out: > > # netstat -lpnt | grep :25 > > If you only see something like: > > tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:25 ... > > then it's running, but won't accept incoming mail from the outside > world. You'll need to bugger the config to make it listen to an > additional IP. How you do that depends on if it's sendmail or postfix. > > If you don't see a line like that at all, then your MTA isn't even > running. > -- > - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - > - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - > -- > - UNIX is actually quite user friendly. The problem is that it's - > - just very picky of who its friends are! - > -- > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So has anyone gotten their sound to work since it broke a few days ago?
On 19/05/14 18:04, Someone wrote: How would I go about finding my model of motherboard? For me, sound worked fine when I first installed a few months back, then it didn't work, then it worked after installing some updates, and then broke again a few days ago after installing some other updates. I saw some chatter on the mailing list about sound at around the same time I noticed mine break, so I assumed it was something that everyone else was experiencing too, but in any case, I'm running the LXDE spin, FWIW. Anyway it sure would be cool to have sound back. I had problems with pulseaudio, removed it and used alsa instead. Have had sound ever since. -- Erik -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Sending email to my local server
On 05/18/2014 05:06 PM, Timothy Murphy issued this missive: I'm trying to send email from my Fedora-20/KDE laptop "rose" to my CentOS-6.5 local home server "grover" (in order to run a SpamAssassin test), but I am finding this surprisingly difficult. I've tried with KMail and mail, sending email to "tim@grover", "tim@grover.localdomain", and various other combinations, but all fail with "recipient rejected". And telnet gives [tim@rose ~]$ telnet 192.168.2.5 25 Trying 192.168.2.5... telnet: connect to address 192.168.2.5: Connection refused Is there a setting I could change, or is the exercise hopeless? Are you certain that grover is running an MTA and that it's listening to anything other than 127.0.0.1? Easiest way to find out: # netstat -lpnt | grep :25 If you only see something like: tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:25 ... then it's running, but won't accept incoming mail from the outside world. You'll need to bugger the config to make it listen to an additional IP. How you do that depends on if it's sendmail or postfix. If you don't see a line like that at all, then your MTA isn't even running. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - UNIX is actually quite user friendly. The problem is that it's - - just very picky of who its friends are! - -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So has anyone gotten their sound to work since it broke a few days ago?
On Tue, 20 May 2014 00:04:46 +0800 Someone wrote: > How would I go about finding my model of motherboard? /sbin/dmidecode is your friend (run it as root). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So has anyone gotten their sound to work since it broke a few days ago?
How would I go about finding my model of motherboard? For me, sound worked fine when I first installed a few months back, then it didn't work, then it worked after installing some updates, and then broke again a few days ago after installing some other updates. I saw some chatter on the mailing list about sound at around the same time I noticed mine break, so I assumed it was something that everyone else was experiencing too, but in any case, I'm running the LXDE spin, FWIW. Anyway it sure would be cool to have sound back. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So has anyone gotten their sound to work since it broke a few days ago?
On May 19, 2014 2:06 PM, "Someone" wrote: > > I'm completely up to date, and I've rebooted several times. Has anyone > had any luck with playing sound? > > Thanks > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org I have no problem what so ever running Fedora 20 KDE on Thinkpad T420i. Your problem must be hardware specific. Do you see anything strange in dmseg. What was the last known kernel on which sound worked? If you think it is kernel related then you should do a kennel bisect. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So has anyone gotten their sound to work since it broke a few days ago?
No problems here with sound either: kernel-3.14.4-200.fc20.x86_64, I had sound problems on another PC with f20, but there it was the first installation, and I did not use it again sofar. suomi On 2014-05-19 15:40, dwoody1 wrote: On 05/19/2014 03:36 AM, Someone wrote: I'm completely up to date, and I've rebooted several times. Has anyone had any luck with playing sound? Thanks I have not had sound working since the original kernel for F20 (3.11.x). What motherboard do you have? Maybe it is specific board that has a problem. Look at the thread for: Sound not working on 3.12.x and 3.13.x kernels for Fedora 20 to see what others have said. The 3.14.x kernel has no sound either. I have other motherboards that do not have a problem with sound. David -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So has anyone gotten their sound to work since it broke a few days ago?
On 05/19/2014 03:36 AM, Someone wrote: I'm completely up to date, and I've rebooted several times. Has anyone had any luck with playing sound? Thanks I have not had sound working since the original kernel for F20 (3.11.x). What motherboard do you have? Maybe it is specific board that has a problem. Look at the thread for: Sound not working on 3.12.x and 3.13.x kernels for Fedora 20 to see what others have said. The 3.14.x kernel has no sound either. I have other motherboards that do not have a problem with sound. David -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: replacement for seamonkey?
On Friday 16 May 2014 06:57:57 lee wrote: > Hi, > > are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without > restrictions management, and will there be one in Fedora? > > > -- > Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug) I've obviously missed something. Can someone please tell me exactly which package(s) have been updated and how. Ta -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: replacement for seamonkey?
Tim writes: > On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 07:57 +0200, lee wrote: >> are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without >> restrictions management, > > Care to clarify that double negative? You want something with > restrictions? No, just seamonkey, or a suitable replacement for it, without. I don`t want restrictions. -- Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So has anyone gotten their sound to work since it broke a few days ago?
On 05/19/14 16:36, Someone wrote: > I'm completely up to date, and I've rebooted several times. Has anyone > had any luck with playing sound? [egreshko@meimei azureus]$ uname -r 3.14.4-200.fc20.x86_64 All up to date Running KDE Never had a problem with sound... 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset High Definition Audio -- Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong. -- Dandemis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Power Management, SystemD, etc.
Hello everyone, I am having some difficulty finding the right information. I have a server that is only needed at certain times. Wake-on-lan works well, so I can do administration, etc. rtcwake works, so I can tell it to wake each day 3-5 minutes or so (haven't decided) before when it is needed. The problem I am having is figuring out how to set it up so it automatically goes to sleep after X period of time and stay asleep. This is a F20 system, so systemd is installed. I would like to have a script get called prior to sleep so it can set rtcwake. I cannot find any documentation for a non-X/gui/gnome/whatever system to set up the idle time out. Do the hooks in /etc/pm/sleep.d work with systemd? I prefer to do suspend to ram for this setup. Thank you for any help, Trever signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
So has anyone gotten their sound to work since it broke a few days ago?
I'm completely up to date, and I've rebooted several times. Has anyone had any luck with playing sound? Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
