Re: Firewall methods for fedora25

[Ed Greshko]

On 11/26/16 09:31, Alex wrote:
> We typically offer submission, simap/spop, smtp, http/https, ssh, and
> domain services on our Internet servers. We also need snmp and nrpe
> for monitoring.

Except for "nrpe" (maybe known by a different name?) all of the services you 
mention can
be selected in the firewalld-applet and can also be specified in the 
firewall-cmd command
line interface.

-- 
You're Welcome Zachary Quinto
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Firewall methods for fedora25

[Sam Varshavchik]

Alex writes:


We typically offer submission, simap/spop, smtp, http/https, ssh, and
domain services on our Internet servers. We also need snmp and nrpe
for monitoring.

Does anyone have a set of reasonable firewalld rules and understand
how it interacts with fail2ban that they could share? firewalld
doesn't even include all these services by default, so it's necessary
to do it one port at a time...

firewalld just doesn't seem to be appropriate for anything more than a
desktop. I'd appreciate any ideas on how you build a firewall for
fedora servers, particularly as it relates to interoperating with
fail2ban and standard Internet services.


Well, you can simply start with the stock server firewall configuration. I  
don't recall, offhand, which ports it opens by default. Simply look at the  
default configuration, and make sure that all those ports are open. That's  
it.




pgpCve3xLQ05p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Firewall methods for fedora25

[Eric Griffith]

I don't use fail2ban, so I can't vouch that these instructions work. That
being said, a quick google search of "firewalld fail2ban" led me to the
very first search result of:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fail2ban_with_FirewallD


Do those instructions work?

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Alex  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm most familiar and comfortable with iptables, and use shorewall on
> my firewalls. With fedora23, it appears the default has shifted to
> firewalld. This has created a problem for me ever since, particularly
> with trying to build a reasonable firewall on my mail servers, as well
> as interacting with fail2ban.
>
> We typically offer submission, simap/spop, smtp, http/https, ssh, and
> domain services on our Internet servers. We also need snmp and nrpe
> for monitoring.
>
> Does anyone have a set of reasonable firewalld rules and understand
> how it interacts with fail2ban that they could share? firewalld
> doesn't even include all these services by default, so it's necessary
> to do it one port at a time...
>
> firewalld just doesn't seem to be appropriate for anything more than a
> desktop. I'd appreciate any ideas on how you build a firewall for
> fedora servers, particularly as it relates to interoperating with
> fail2ban and standard Internet services.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Down(up)grading from desktop to server

[Robin Laing]

On 21/11/16 23:19, Samuel Sieb wrote:

On 11/21/2016 09:00 PM, Robin Laing wrote:

I have an old desktop that is being re-purposed to a file server.  What
is the best procedure with F25 coming out.  Presently running F23.

As a desktop, it was dual purpose but now will be just a file server.

Is it better to just remove the extra packages manually before the
upgrade or to remove some and upgrade the rest?


It's not clear me what the difference is between these two options. They
sound the same to me.


I don't want to rebuild the whole system from scratch as I have a number
of systems to do that to already.


There is no need to remove the extra packages, but if you're concerned
about them or want the disk space back, then I would remove them before
doing the upgrade.  Less packages to download and quicker upgrade time.
If you just don't want the desktop login running or available, then you
could change the default run target to multiuser instead of graphical.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


This machine is going to be just a file server for DLNA so doesn't meed 
many packages.


Disk space is not an issue so I guess I will just upgrade over the next 
couple of days and see what happens.  Know I have to get rid of 
rpmfusion nvidia driver due to issues.


Thank you.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Firewall methods for fedora25

[Alex]

Hi,

I'm most familiar and comfortable with iptables, and use shorewall on
my firewalls. With fedora23, it appears the default has shifted to
firewalld. This has created a problem for me ever since, particularly
with trying to build a reasonable firewall on my mail servers, as well
as interacting with fail2ban.

We typically offer submission, simap/spop, smtp, http/https, ssh, and
domain services on our Internet servers. We also need snmp and nrpe
for monitoring.

Does anyone have a set of reasonable firewalld rules and understand
how it interacts with fail2ban that they could share? firewalld
doesn't even include all these services by default, so it's necessary
to do it one port at a time...

firewalld just doesn't seem to be appropriate for anything more than a
desktop. I'd appreciate any ideas on how you build a firewall for
fedora servers, particularly as it relates to interoperating with
fail2ban and standard Internet services.

Thanks,
Alex
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Redshift and Dropbox not quite working after F24-F25 upgrade

[Matthew Saltzman]

On Fri, 2016-11-25 at 14:21 -0500, Eric Griffith wrote:
> Not sure about Dropbox, but RedShift is a known issue. Redshift's
> model doesn't work under Wayland, the default session in F25. The
> same idea as RedShift has been / is working on being integrated into
> upstream Gnome and will work its way down to users in a future
> update. It still works under X, however.
> 
> You can go back to using X by logging out, and hitting the gear next
> to the "login" button. From there, hit "Gnome on Xorg" and login. 

OK Thanks. Good information.

> 
> Cheers!
> Eric
> 
> > On Nov 25, 2016, at 12:39, Matthew Saltzman 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > I have two GNOME workstations upgraded from F24 to F25. Before the
> > upgrade, Dropbox and Redshift were accessible from the little
> > slide-out 
> > task bar at the lower left of the screen. Now, on one I see Dropbox
> > but
> > not Redshift and on the other, I don't have the slide-out drawer at
> > all. According to GNOME Tweak-Tool, both apps are listed on the
> > startup
> > panel.
> > 
> > So far, everything else seems to have gone smoothly.
> > 
> > How to debug?  TIA.
> > -- 
> > Matthew Saltzman
> > Clemson University Math Sciences
> > mjs AT clemson DOT edu
> > ___
> > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Matthew Saltzman
Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Google chrome gets deadlocked on F25

[Ed Greshko]

On 11/25/16 18:38, Paul Smith wrote:
> Yes, Ed, I can now confirm that disabling gpu when calling Chrome
> fizes the problem.
>
> My video hardware and drivers are below.

OK  I have no similar HW available to me to test.  :-(

-- 
You're Welcome Zachary Quinto
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Continuing dnf weirdness

[Samuel Sieb]

On 11/25/2016 08:42 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:

Can anyone explain this output?

  http://pastebin.com/1xtjpB5s

I.e. why is dnf complaining about broken dependencies in
libreoffice-gtk2 and libreoffice-x11 when neither package is installed
or required by any of the updates being installed?

I don't have F25 installed anywhere yet, but from something I've seen 
mentioned on one of the lists, dnf currently prints that message for 
weak dependencies.  And libreoffice-x11 is a weak dependency of 
libreoffice-core.  So this is not a problem and will be corrected soon.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Hdd not seen in bios after installing Fedora

[Laverne Schrock]

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 8:44 AM,  wrote:

> So I am currently having this issues : my hdd is not listed in the bios
> boot menu after installing Fedora in dual boot with Windows 10. To check if
> all the partitions are ok, I used the Fedora live and everything seems ok.
> It lists both windows and the freshly created Fedora partitions. Still,
> when i reboot and get into BIOS the only boot option is the DVD. Is it
> possible that the windows didn't shut down completely before installing
> Fedora and now the hdd is still mounted somehow , hiding it from the bios
> boot menu? Any ideas for making the hdd visible again?


Is this a UEFI box or is it running classic BIOS?

In my limited experience, classic BIOS will list all the detected devices
if that box supports booting from that type of device. UEFI boxes (again,
in my limited experience) will only offer to boot from a device if it has
the appropriate filesystems/files on it.

If you booted in classic BIOS mode to install Fedora, the installer would
setup the bootloader accordingly. If you then switch back to UEFI mode and
try to boot from the HDD, it won't work.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

High cpu usge and high io percentage

[jd1008]

ext4-rsv-conver ??

In kernel source /fs/ext4/super.c
we see

/*
 * The maximum number of concurrent works can be high and
 * concurrency isn't really necessary.  Limit it to 1.
 */
EXT4_SB(sb)->rsv_conversion_wq =
alloc_workqueue("ext4-rsv-conversion", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | 
WQ_UNBOUND, 1);

if (!EXT4_SB(sb)->rsv_conversion_wq) {
printk(KERN_ERR "EXT4-fs: failed to create workqueue\n");
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto failed_mount4;
}


However, there is no other reference to this symbol in the rest of the 
kernel source.


Reason I am asking is that it is often shown using much cpu bandwidth,
and much io percentage (/bin/iotop -d 3).

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Redshift and Dropbox not quite working after F24-F25 upgrade

[Eric Griffith]

Not sure about Dropbox, but RedShift is a known issue. Redshift's model doesn't 
work under Wayland, the default session in F25. The same idea as RedShift has 
been / is working on being integrated into upstream Gnome and will work its way 
down to users in a future update. It still works under X, however.

You can go back to using X by logging out, and hitting the gear next to the 
"login" button. From there, hit "Gnome on Xorg" and login. 

Cheers!
Eric

> On Nov 25, 2016, at 12:39, Matthew Saltzman  wrote:
> 
> I have two GNOME workstations upgraded from F24 to F25. Before the
> upgrade, Dropbox and Redshift were accessible from the little slide-out 
> task bar at the lower left of the screen. Now, on one I see Dropbox but
> not Redshift and on the other, I don't have the slide-out drawer at
> all. According to GNOME Tweak-Tool, both apps are listed on the startup
> panel.
> 
> So far, everything else seems to have gone smoothly.
> 
> How to debug?  TIA.
> -- 
> Matthew Saltzman
> Clemson University Math Sciences
> mjs AT clemson DOT edu
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: SELinux forces Fedora 25 upgrade into a reboot loop

[Sam Varshavchik]

Patrick O'Callaghan writes:


On Fri, 2016-11-25 at 11:08 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Wondering if all upgrades with selinux enabled are broken, or just  
something 

> with this particular laptop. This doesn't look like a system-specific 
> failure to me, but if all upgrades with enforcing selinux blow up like  
this, 

> I would've expected a lot of noise in here, by now… More details in bug 
> 1398696.

My system has been enforcing for at least the last 5 versions (possibly
more), and I had no problem with this.


What output do you get from:

ls -alZd /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade

On the one with the problem I get:

drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root unconfined_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0 233472 Nov 25  
10:31 /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade


Now, another one of my laptops shows:

drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root unconfined_u:object_r:rpm_var_lib_t:s0 221184 Nov 23  
16:09 system-upgrade


However that laptop was already running in permissive mode. Still, according  
to rpm:


file /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade is not owned by any package

After rmdir-ing and mkdir-ing /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade its selinux  
context is changed to unconfined_u:object_r:rpm_var_lib_t:s0, so I think  
that's where the problem was. Unclear how the former selinux context was  
what it was.


pgpoHccMsScwd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Redshift and Dropbox not quite working after F24-F25 upgrade

[Matthew Saltzman]

I have two GNOME workstations upgraded from F24 to F25. Before the
upgrade, Dropbox and Redshift were accessible from the little slide-out 
task bar at the lower left of the screen. Now, on one I see Dropbox but
not Redshift and on the other, I don't have the slide-out drawer at
all. According to GNOME Tweak-Tool, both apps are listed on the startup
panel.

So far, everything else seems to have gone smoothly.

How to debug?  TIA.
-- 
Matthew Saltzman
Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

dbus spamming syslog

[Neal Becker]

I've got zillions of these messages (f25):

Nov 23 12:42:11 nbecker2 dbus-daemon[776]: [system] Connection ":1.28" is 
not allowed to add more match rules (increase limits in configuration file 
if required; max_match_rules_per_connection=2048)
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Continuing dnf weirdness

[Ian Pilcher]

Can anyone explain this output?

  http://pastebin.com/1xtjpB5s

I.e. why is dnf complaining about broken dependencies in
libreoffice-gtk2 and libreoffice-x11 when neither package is installed
or required by any of the updates being installed?

--

Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com
 "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship" 

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: SELinux forces Fedora 25 upgrade into a reboot loop

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Fri, 2016-11-25 at 11:08 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Wondering if all upgrades with selinux enabled are broken, or just something  
> with this particular laptop. This doesn't look like a system-specific  
> failure to me, but if all upgrades with enforcing selinux blow up like this,  
> I would've expected a lot of noise in here, by now… More details in bug  
> 1398696.

My system has been enforcing for at least the last 5 versions (possibly
more), and I had no problem with this.

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: SELinux forces Fedora 25 upgrade into a reboot loop

[James Hogarth]

On 25 November 2016 at 16:08, Sam Varshavchik  wrote:
> With selinux set to enforcing, my system-upgrade to 25 failed to start,
> resulting in a reboot loop. I fished the following out of journalctl:
>
> Nov 25 09:51:55 thinkpenguin.email-scan.com audit[1]: AVC avc:  denied  {
> open } for  pid=1 comm="systemd"
> path="/var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/.dnf-system-upgrade" dev="dm-1"
> ino=1181602 scontext=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0
>
> I had to drop to an emergency shell, and set selinux to permissive, in order
> for the upgrade to do its thing.
>
> Wondering if all upgrades with selinux enabled are broken, or just something
> with this particular laptop. This doesn't look like a system-specific
> failure to me, but if all upgrades with enforcing selinux blow up like this,
> I would've expected a lot of noise in here, by now… More details in bug
> 1398696.
>
>

For what it's worth my systems are always Enforcing ... two laptops
upgraded (one in beta and one in RC) with no problem and a headless
server at release with no problem

There must be something off with your setup somehow
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

SELinux forces Fedora 25 upgrade into a reboot loop

[Sam Varshavchik]

With selinux set to enforcing, my system-upgrade to 25 failed to start,  
resulting in a reboot loop. I fished the following out of journalctl:


Nov 25 09:51:55 thinkpenguin.email-scan.com audit[1]: AVC avc:  denied   
{ open } for  pid=1 comm="systemd" path="/var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/.dnf- 
system-upgrade" dev="dm-1" ino=1181602 scontext=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0


I had to drop to an emergency shell, and set selinux to permissive, in order  
for the upgrade to do its thing.


Wondering if all upgrades with selinux enabled are broken, or just something  
with this particular laptop. This doesn't look like a system-specific  
failure to me, but if all upgrades with enforcing selinux blow up like this,  
I would've expected a lot of noise in here, by now… More details in bug  
1398696.





pgp_PTYGvaAZN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F25-Atomic - Error creating Vagrant synced folder

[Matthew Miller]

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 03:46:46PM +0100, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
> > Yes please. An issue at https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/ is probably the
> > best place.
> Created: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/181

Thanks! Since it's holidays in the US, it might be a little while
before there's a response, but we definitely appreciate the report.

-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Hdd not seen in bios after installing Fedora

[octysro]

So I am currently having this issues : my hdd is not listed in the bios boot 
menu after installing Fedora in dual boot with Windows 10. To check if all the 
partitions are ok, I used the Fedora live and everything seems ok. It lists 
both windows and the freshly created Fedora partitions. Still, when i reboot 
and get into BIOS the only boot option is the DVD. Is it possible that the 
windows didn't shut down completely before installing Fedora and now the hdd is 
still mounted somehow , hiding it from the bios boot menu? Any ideas for making 
the hdd visible again?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F25-Atomic - Error creating Vagrant synced folder

[Juan Orti Alcaine]

2016-11-25 15:12 GMT+01:00 Matthew Miller :
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:09:16AM +0100, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
>> I'm launching a fedora/25-atomic-host with Vagrant but it fails to
>> create the synced folder although the VM boots fine and I can ssh in
>> it. I haven't done any customization, just launching the box like
>> explained in the instructions to get Fedora 25 Atomic.
>> Should I open a bug?
>
> Yes please. An issue at https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/ is probably the
> best place.
>

Created: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/181
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F25-Atomic - Error creating Vagrant synced folder

[Matthew Miller]

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:09:16AM +0100, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
> I'm launching a fedora/25-atomic-host with Vagrant but it fails to
> create the synced folder although the VM boots fine and I can ssh in
> it. I haven't done any customization, just launching the box like
> explained in the instructions to get Fedora 25 Atomic.
> Should I open a bug?

Yes please. An issue at https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/ is probably the
best place.

-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F25: XFCE won't start

[Marco Guazzone]

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Marco Guazzone 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I've installed F25 Workstation x64 from Live iso (GNOME window manager).
> Now I want to run XFCE window manager.
>
> I installed it with:
>
>dnf groupinstall Xfce
>
> Then rebooted and tried to log in (by selecting XFCE from GDM).
> But after clicking on the log in button, XFCE seems to have problems and
> the screen immediately comes back to the GDM login.
>
> Any idea?
>
>

It turns out that GDM doesn't like XFCE

Indeed, after enabling lightdm in place of GDM:

   sudo systemctl enable lightdm --force

XFCE can start.

Best,

Marco
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Umatrix Firefox Addon -

[Andras Simon]

2016-11-25 12:54 GMT+01:00, Bob Goodwin :
> On 11/25/16 05:23, Andras Simon wrote:
>> FWIW Umatrix works here on F23 with Firefox 50.
>>
>> Andras
> +
> Strange, one more reason for me to go
> back and try again. I certainly had a
> problem I never saw before, doing
> nothing out of the ordinary ...
>
> This is Fedora 25, began as the alpha
> version, updated everyday since
> initially installed, if that matters. I
> have two more computers to upgrade to
> F25, may try another one later today.

Perhaps you should first see if umatrix works with FF50 in F24.

Andras
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Umatrix Firefox Addon -

[Bob Goodwin]

On 11/25/16 05:23, Andras Simon wrote:

FWIW Umatrix works here on F23 with Firefox 50.

Andras

+
Strange, one more reason for me to go 
back and try again. I certainly had a 
problem I never saw before, doing 
nothing out of the ordinary ...


This is Fedora 25, began as the alpha 
version, updated everyday since 
initially installed, if that matters. I 
have two more computers to upgrade to 
F25, may try another one later today.


Thanks,

Bob

--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10  FEDORA-25/64it LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Umatrix Firefox Addon -

[Bob Goodwin]

On 11/25/16 03:49, Samuel Sieb wrote:
That looks like a nice addon, I'll 
probably add it shortly. :-)


If you got it from there, I don't see 
any reason it wouldn't work.  I don't 
have FF50 yet so I can't test it 
myself.  There are no open issues 
about that either.


Was there any more info in the error 
message? 


+

Sorry but that's all I have for now. 
I'll try FF05 again when I have time but 
for the moment I will just "# dnf 
upgrade --exclude=firefox" since FF49 works.


Thanks,

Bob

--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10  FEDORA-25/64it LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Google chrome gets deadlocked on F25

[Paul Smith]

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Ed Greshko  wrote:
>> It appears that by disabling gpu when calling Chrome, the problem is fixed:
>>
>> google-chrome-stable --disable-gpu
>>
>> I will confirm that later.
>
> Well, if that does fix your problem then the obvious follow-up question would 
> be.
> What is your Video Hardware and drivers.

Yes, Ed, I can now confirm that disabling gpu when calling Chrome
fizes the problem.

My video hardware and drivers are below.

Thanks,

Paul

--
$ lspci -k | grep -A 2 VGA
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
[AMD/ATI] RV710 [Radeon HD 4350/4550]
Subsystem: Dell Device 904e
Kernel driver in use: radeon
$

$ grep driver /var/log/Xorg.0.log
[64.635] X.Org XInput driver : 24.1
[65.083] (==) Matched ati as autoconfigured driver 0
[65.083] (==) Matched ati as autoconfigured driver 1
[65.083] (==) Matched modesetting as autoconfigured driver 2
[65.083] (==) Matched fbdev as autoconfigured driver 3
[65.083] (==) Matched vesa as autoconfigured driver 4
[65.083] (==) Assigned the driver to the xf86ConfigLayout
[65.206] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/ati_drv.so
[65.247] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so
[65.377] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/modesetting_drv.so
[65.425] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.so
[65.449] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.so
[65.476] (II) FBDEV: driver for framebuffer: fbdev
[65.476] (II) VESA: driver for VESA chipsets: vesa
[65.730] (II) RADEON(0): [DRI2]   DRI driver: r600
[65.730] (II) RADEON(0): [DRI2]   VDPAU driver: r600
[71.825] ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 24.1
[71.825] (II) Using input driver 'evdev' for 'Power Button'
[73.220] (II) Using input driver 'evdev' for 'Power Button'
[73.221] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device.
[73.222] (II) Using input driver 'evdev' for 'USB Optical Mouse'
[73.224] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device.
[73.225] (II) Using input driver 'evdev' for 'Dell Dell USB Entry Keyboard'
[73.226] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device.
[73.226] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device.
[73.227] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device.
[73.227] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device.
[73.228] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device.
[73.228] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device.
[73.229] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device.
[73.229] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device.
$
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Umatrix Firefox Addon -

[Andras Simon]

2016-11-25 1:47 GMT+01:00, Bob Goodwin :
> Does anyone know why Firefox no longer
> allows the umatrix addon, not since the
> update to Firefox 50 two days ago.
> Umatrix was removed and would not
> install. I had to downgrade to Firefox
> 49 and install a copy from the umatrix
> web page to get it back again.

FWIW Umatrix works here on F23 with Firefox 50.

Andras
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

F25-Atomic - Error creating Vagrant synced folder

[Juan Orti Alcaine]

Hi,

I'm launching a fedora/25-atomic-host with Vagrant but it fails to
create the synced folder although the VM boots fine and I can ssh in
it. I haven't done any customization, just launching the box like
explained in the instructions to get Fedora 25 Atomic.

Should I open a bug?

This is the error:

---
The following SSH command responded with a non-zero exit status.
Vagrant assumes that this means the command failed!

mkdir -p /vagrant

Stdout from the command:



Stderr from the command:

mkdir: cannot create directory ‘/vagrant’: Operation not permitted
---

Thanks.

-- 
Juan Orti
https://apuntesderootblog.wordpress.com/
GPG: 61F0 8272 6882 BCA6 3A35  88F6 B630 4B72 DEEB D08B
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

F25: XFCE won't start

[Marco Guazzone]

Hello,

I've installed F25 Workstation x64 from Live iso (GNOME window manager).
Now I want to run XFCE window manager.

I installed it with:

   dnf groupinstall Xfce

Then rebooted and tried to log in (by selecting XFCE from GDM).
But after clicking on the log in button, XFCE seems to have problems and
the screen immediately comes back to the GDM login.

Any idea?

Thanks.

Best,

-- Marco
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Umatrix Firefox Addon -

[Samuel Sieb]

On 11/25/2016 12:20 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:

On 11/25/16 01:44, Samuel Sieb wrote:

On 11/24/2016 10:34 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:

My question is why has Mozilla decided not to allow it? In the past it
has said an addon
is not compatible with a new version, however in this case it just says
Firefox will not
install it implying something else ...


Most likely it's not signed.  Where did you get it from?


I believe it was from:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/umatrix/


That looks like a nice addon, I'll probably add it shortly. :-)

If you got it from there, I don't see any reason it wouldn't work.  I 
don't have FF50 yet so I can't test it myself.  There are no open issues 
about that either.


Was there any more info in the error message?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Umatrix Firefox Addon -

[Bob Goodwin]

On 11/25/16 01:44, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/24/2016 10:34 PM, Bob Goodwin 
wrote:
My question is why has Mozilla 
decided not to allow it? In the past it

has said an addon
is not compatible with a new version, 
however in this case it just says

Firefox will not
install it implying something else ...

Most likely it's not signed.  Where 
did you get it from?


+

I believe it was from: 
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/umatrix/



--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10  FEDORA-25/64it LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org