Re: Calibre on Fedora 33
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 1:02 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 08:37:03PM -0500, David King wrote: > > On 1/9/21 8:05 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: > > > I'm wanting to run Calibre with DeDRM. Version 5 of Calibre was written > > > for Python3 while version 4 was written in Python2. DeDRM is only > > > available for Python2. Python3 support is being worked on but is still > > > in development. > > > > > > Has anyone found a good workaround until DeDRM for Python3 is > available? > > > > Calibre 4.23.0 is the version that is packaged and available from the > Fedora > > 33 repositories. It runs under Python 2 so DeDRM work just fine with > it. > > Yes, and no. > > 4.23.0 is in f33, but it is using python3, not python2. > > Fedora moved calibre to python3 much sooner than upstream did because > python2 was being phased out in fedora. Unfortunately, we can't upgrade > to 5.x due to some dependencies in other packages not being ready yet. > ;( > > > I've been using this for some time without issue. > > With the python3 plugin it should work I would think... > I agree that the existing python2 plugins don't work. For example DeDRM 6.8.1 errors out with python 2 print statement instead of the python3 print() statement. The DeDRM built for python3 fails to install on Calibre 4.23 with an error that the plugin requires a version of Calibrer >= 5.0.0. I'll give Calibre 5.0.0 a try as suggested by Patrick O'Callaghan. Thanks, Clifford -- > @osm_washington www.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: btrfs: What to do with large growing files?
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:57 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > So from what I understand once a file is >0 that you can't set nodatacow. Correct. > I'm playing around with cryptocurrency and the current one downloads the > whole blockchain and it's at 65GB and growing. I think the growing part is > the problem. That and it's being stored on /home which is a spinning disk not > an SSD like the system disk. > > I'm seeing a lot of IO wait in glances and the system is sluggish even though > CPU and memory usage is relatively low. > > Ideas? It'd be useful to know if this is some kind of database, if it's one big file or many, if it's doing insertions (typical with database) or append. It might just be busy and will settle itself out once it's done downloading. And even maybe know what the program is. And I can ask folks on #btrfs. Btrfs does quite a lot of delayed allocation so you might see higher IO wait than you're used to, but as a side effect it turns random writes into sequential writes which write and read faster and have less fragmentation. So it's overall better. But the system being sluggish makes me wonder if something else is competing for IO with this task and what that process's write pattern is too. It could be lock contention, the easy way to alleviate that is give one of the tasks its own subvolume. I'm assuming this problem is all over by now but if you can reproduce it the first thing to look at is sysrq+t https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Sysrq that likely fills the dmesg buffer, but 'journalctl -k --no-hostname -o short-monotonic > dmesg.txt` will do it and then you can upload that file somewhere and I'll bug someone about it :P if no one on here knows how to read sysrq+t (i'm not great at it unless it's really obvious). Ideally have the sysrq+t ready to just hit enter. When the sluggishness happens, hit return. If that's all normal we might have to get into bcc-tools or something. -- Chris Murphy ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: BTRFS partition corrupted after deleting files in /home
On 1/11/21 11:02 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: something wrong with my HDD but the guys on the mailing list told me I did not have to worry. https://listi.jpberlin.de/pipermail/smartmontools-support/2020-November/000560.html https://listi.jpberlin.de/pipermail/smartmontools-support/2020-November/000559.html Your message indicated a sequence of errors that look like write failures, which sounds a lot like the problem that Chris described with your btrfs, "multiple writes from one commit are missing" With all respect due to Carlos E. R., given that you were seeing read and write errors then, and you appear to be seeing write errors still, perhaps the conclusion that your hardware is OK was premature. You should remain open the possibility that there is something wrong with one piece of hardware or another, particularly as you continue to gather new evidence. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: BTRFS partition corrupted after deleting files in /home
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:02 PM Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:02 AM Matthew Miller > wrote: > > > > > > Well, another way of saying that is "I wasn't having problems but now I have > > them", which isn't super-surprising with a hard drive. What does smartctl > > tell you about the drive's self-tests? > > > > Well I provided this info at the beginning of this thread. > > I am providing here again: > > SmartCTL output (smartctl -A) : > https://pastebin.com/raw/B6AdLZXt -x has more information that might be relevant including firmware revision and some additional logs for recent drive reported errors which usually are benign. But might be clues. These two attributes I'm not familiar with 187 Reported_Uncorrect 0x0032 100 096 000Old_age Always - 4294967301 188 Command_Timeout 0x0032 100 100 000Old_age Always - 98785820672 But the value is well above threshold for both so I'm not worried about it. -- Chris Murphy ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: BTRFS partition corrupted after deleting files in /home
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:55 AM Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > > Actually it is me who should be thanking you for not giving up. > > For me giving up was not an option since that would involve me losing > all my data. No problem! We should talk about a backup plan in another thread :D In my own case, I never need them, but I have 1/2 dozen completely independent backups, because I hate my data and I'm constantly trying to destroy it. (This is turning into a really bad joke but hopefully it's weirdly amusing. If you like your data you *definitely* should be backing up! Doesn't matter what the file system is, or if it's on raid, or "safe" in the cloud, etc.) > > Full output of repair command over here: > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/17EQ5TYJE5a4iwRGTXXj9Hh38btxFBLAJ/view?usp=sharing > > 2) btrfs check --init-csum-tree /dev/mapper/dm_crypt > >This is where the minor bad news happens. > >This command exited with a "Segmentation Fault(Core Dumped)" > >Full output here: > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IYnLcw-vkZ2UeH0rOZje4kbhzB_tYaKy/view?usp=sharing Forwarded this to Btrfs dev, so we'll just have to be patient. I strongly suggest some kind of backup of the data, and confirm it's good. Since you were stressed about maybe losing it? Even two copies! Not anything because it's Btrfs but because it's important to you. Bad things happen all the time that have nothing to do with the file system. Because of the --init-csum-tree failure i'm a bit concerned that it's possible the --repair step didn't completely repair things. So... just keep important things backed up. Top priority. If you told me you hate your data then I wouldn't worry about it. > Let me know the next steps ie. Do you need BTRFS logs to diagnose the > root cause of the problem ? Not sure. I've asked. If there's a request to, we'll run it through gdb and see what happens. Can you tell me what you get for: free -m btrfs fi us / It'll give an idea what the memory requirement is for the init-csum-tree. It really should not be a lot, it's less complicated than the repair by a lot. Glad that worked though, phew! -- Chris Murphy ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: BTRFS partition corrupted after deleting files in /home
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 20:14:04 -0700 Chris Murphy wrote: > The #1 reason they don't get caught and set > free, is tester exhaustion. This is a reasonable outcome. People have > better things to do than debug stuff. But it's sometimes a necessary > effort because we really are at significant confidence in Btrfs > stability equivalent to other file systems, even though we're aware of > its fragility in certain bad failure cases like this one. Not to worry! I read that bcachefs is finally making it into the linux kernel, so real soon now it will be the new shiny object and btrfs will be obsolete :-). ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: BTRFS partition corrupted after deleting files in /home
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:30 AM Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:55 PM Matthew Miller > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:54:07PM +0530, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > > > > Sreyan, is the drive that this file system is on the same drive as in > > > > this reported thread? > > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/DJWIOXUOSAAHAAXSUTKREV452QDCXV3D/#6UDYNNWOC23NJKSLMIABSAU4QFYANSRB > > > > > > > > > > Yes it is the same drive. > > > Does that mean something is wrong with the drive ? > > > > It seems very likely -- either with the drive, or a cable, or the > > controller, or some other aspect of your system. You're getting serious > > errors regardless of what you're actually putting on the drive. > > > > I beg to differ. > > I never faced problems like this when I was on "thick/older" LVM with EXT4. > > It is only when I switched to thin-pools and then to BTRFS that I > started getting these problems. This is an interesting data point. I will incorporate it. In the meantime, we really need to stay focused on facts and not jump to conclusions. We can evaluate whether you stick with Btrfs, pros/cons. Bugs like this are really slippery. The #1 reason they don't get caught and set free, is tester exhaustion. This is a reasonable outcome. People have better things to do than debug stuff. But it's sometimes a necessary effort because we really are at significant confidence in Btrfs stability equivalent to other file systems, even though we're aware of its fragility in certain bad failure cases like this one. The only way it gets better is to persevere. Thanks, -- Chris Murphy ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: mount source assignment
Ah! Thanks. On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:58:34 -0500 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 02:24:25PM -0800, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > > What I have here is the result of two mounts of mp3 players, from > > different manufacturers, followed by the (edited) output from > > findmnt. What interests me is the source assignment. Any thoughts > > as to what might be causing this, or the significance of the change? > > > > % mount UUID=4C2B-B6B0 /mt_test --options rw,user,umask= > > `-/mt_test/dev/sdb1 > > ..^ > > % mount UUID=1874-44DE /mt_test --options rw,user,umask= > > `-/mt_test/dev/sdb > > ..^ > > The one device has a partition table and at least that one partition. > The other one just uses the whole block device without partitioning. > You can do this with any USB stick as well. > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: btrfs: What to do with large growing files?
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 4:57 PM Joe Zeff wrote: > On 1/11/21 3:14 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > There may be a slicker way to do it but this does work. > > Is there a reason that you can't just us > > chattr -C /some/path/Blockchain > > and get it all done with one step? > My understanding is that once the file is create (> 0 bytes) that you can't change it. Thanks, Richard ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: btrfs: What to do with large growing files?
On 1/11/21 3:14 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: There may be a slicker way to do it but this does work. Is there a reason that you can't just us chattr -C /some/path/Blockchain and get it all done with one step? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: btrfs: What to do with large growing files?
On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 13:57 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> So from what I understand once a file is >0 that you can't set nodatacow.
>
> I'm playing around with cryptocurrency and the current one downloads the
> whole blockchain and it's at 65GB and growing. I think the growing part is
> the problem. That and it's being stored on /home which is a spinning disk
> not an SSD like the system disk.
>
> I'm seeing a lot of IO wait in glances and the system is sluggish even
> though CPU and memory usage is relatively low.
>
> Ideas?
You have to copy the file. I've just done something analogous with a
large VM image, following Chris Murphy's helpful suggestion. See the
recent thread on "Compression on Btrfs" (though the method has nothing
to do with compression as such).
If your file is Blockchain and lives in /some/path:
1) chattr +C /some/path ('lsattr -ld /some/path' to check)
2) cp Blockchain Blockchain.new (in my case I had to copy to another
device and back again owing to the size of the file).
3) rm Blockchain
4) mv Blockchain.new Blockchain
There may be a slicker way to do it but this does work.
poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: mount source assignment
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 02:24:25PM -0800, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > What I have here is the result of two mounts of mp3 players, from > different manufacturers, followed by the (edited) output from findmnt. > What interests me is the source assignment. Any thoughts as to > what might be causing this, or the significance of the change? > > % mount UUID=4C2B-B6B0 /mt_test --options rw,user,umask= > `-/mt_test/dev/sdb1 > ..^ > % mount UUID=1874-44DE /mt_test --options rw,user,umask= > `-/mt_test/dev/sdb > ..^ The one device has a partition table and at least that one partition. The other one just uses the whole block device without partitioning. You can do this with any USB stick as well. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Any recent progress toward Fedora support for Raspberry Pi 4?
On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 13:03 -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > Probably worth following htis thread: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/a...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/BTCBRUNAFMUBM2NW23QH5NQ5IT3X6CN6/ > > I'm currently running the 4GB variant of the Raspberry Pi 4 with the > stock aarch64 image, installed with 'fedora-arm-image-installer > --target=rpi4 '. It doesn't have all the features but as a > headless server, it works fine. Jonathan, With 8 GB the Pi4 finally has enough memory to be a fairly satisfactory workstation. By "headless server" do I understand you to mean you have no desktop installed? If so, I need more. --Doc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
mount source assignment
What I have here is the result of two mounts of mp3 players, from different manufacturers, followed by the (edited) output from findmnt. What interests me is the source assignment. Any thoughts as to what might be causing this, or the significance of the change? % mount UUID=4C2B-B6B0 /mt_test --options rw,user,umask= `-/mt_test/dev/sdb1 ..^ % mount UUID=1874-44DE /mt_test --options rw,user,umask= `-/mt_test/dev/sdb ..^ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Calibre on Fedora 33
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 08:37:03PM -0500, David King wrote: > On 1/9/21 8:05 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: > > I'm wanting to run Calibre with DeDRM. Version 5 of Calibre was written > > for Python3 while version 4 was written in Python2. DeDRM is only > > available for Python2. Python3 support is being worked on but is still > > in development. > > > > Has anyone found a good workaround until DeDRM for Python3 is available? > > Calibre 4.23.0 is the version that is packaged and available from the Fedora > 33 repositories. It runs under Python 2 so DeDRM work just fine with it. Yes, and no. 4.23.0 is in f33, but it is using python3, not python2. Fedora moved calibre to python3 much sooner than upstream did because python2 was being phased out in fedora. Unfortunately, we can't upgrade to 5.x due to some dependencies in other packages not being ready yet. ;( > I've been using this for some time without issue. With the python3 plugin it should work I would think... kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Is it possible to create an email-only user in fedora linux?
> Am 11.01.2021 um 19:24 schrieb Bill Oliver : > > So, I am setting up some forum software on a VPS server I have rented > and would like to invite users to have access to the forum *and* an > email account, but nothing else. > > I have dovecot set up, and make roundcube available as the web-based > mail client. > > The only thing I know to do is to add them as a user, which basically > gives them a shell, and I'm not enthusiastic about that. I hope I do not misunderstand your requirements. You need not set up a system user to allow mail usage. You just create all your mail users in dovecot (/etc/dovecot/users) using doveadm and configure postfix to authenticate against dovecot (virtual mailboxes in postfix speech). The mail ist stored at e.g. /home/vmail// and everything is managed by dovecot (vmail being the dovecot process owner). ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: xpdf
On 1/11/21 12:12 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Btw, "/proc//root" points to the root directory (/) for that process. It has nothing to do with the root user. Yes, why /proc//root" points to the root directory (/) ? There is a ton of these links. It's a kernel thing. Every process has that. I expect it's related to chroot and containers. It's possible for a process to have a root directory that is not "/". ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: xpdf
=== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 === > > On 1/11/21 8:05 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > When I load xpdf (as a standard user), I get: > > I assume you mean you're running it from a terminal. > > > "/proc/19969/root" > > or > > "/proc/20111/root" > > > > I can open the file but, I get this message every time now. > > > > What is wrong? > > Graphical applications are usually not expected to be run from a > terminal and tend to print debugging or other info on stdout. However, > On F33, I don't see that. > > Btw, "/proc//root" points to the root directory (/) for that > process. It has nothing to do with the root user. Yes, why /proc//root" points to the root directory (/) ? There is a ton of these links. It is a fedora32 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Is it possible to create an email-only user in fedora linux?
On 1/11/21 11:24 AM, Bill Oliver wrote: Is there a better way to do this? If memory serves, you can specify that the user isn't able to log in; I think the option is nologin. If not, you can always specify logout as the user's shell. Or, if you want to allow the user's to change their password but nothing else, specify passwd as the shell. I know how well that works, as I once had an email account on a unix box that was set up like that. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
btrfs: What to do with large growing files?
So from what I understand once a file is >0 that you can't set nodatacow. I'm playing around with cryptocurrency and the current one downloads the whole blockchain and it's at 65GB and growing. I think the growing part is the problem. That and it's being stored on /home which is a spinning disk not an SSD like the system disk. I'm seeing a lot of IO wait in glances and the system is sluggish even though CPU and memory usage is relatively low. Ideas? Thanks, Richard ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: xpdf
On 1/11/21 8:05 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: When I load xpdf (as a standard user), I get: I assume you mean you're running it from a terminal. "/proc/19969/root" or "/proc/20111/root" I can open the file but, I get this message every time now. What is wrong? Graphical applications are usually not expected to be run from a terminal and tend to print debugging or other info on stdout. However, On F33, I don't see that. Btw, "/proc//root" points to the root directory (/) for that process. It has nothing to do with the root user. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: BTRFS partition corrupted after deleting files in /home
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:02 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > > Well, another way of saying that is "I wasn't having problems but now I have > them", which isn't super-surprising with a hard drive. What does smartctl > tell you about the drive's self-tests? > Well I provided this info at the beginning of this thread. I am providing here again: SmartCTL output (smartctl -A) : https://pastebin.com/raw/B6AdLZXt I ran the smartctl test a month ago, since I thought there was something wrong with my HDD but the guys on the mailing list told me I did not have to worry. https://listi.jpberlin.de/pipermail/smartmontools-support/2020-November/000560.html -- Regards, Sreyan Chakravarty ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: BTRFS partition corrupted after deleting files in /home
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:24 AM Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 11:55 AM Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > > > So thanks > > for not giving up. > > > > Actually it is me who should be thanking you for not giving up. > > For me giving up was not an option since that would involve me losing > all my data. > > Thank you again for your time and patience, others would have told me > to reinstall my OS or restore my backups. > > > > sudo dnf install > > https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ngompa/btrfsprogs-robustimg/fedora-33-x86_64/01873195-btrfs-progs/btrfs-progs-5.9+git20210108.3783313-0.fc33.1.x86_64.rpm > > > > Ok, I finally have some good news and some minor bad news hopefully. > > Good news first. > > It worked, I can now mount my BTRFS root file system: > > # mount -t btrfs /dev/mapper/dm_crypt /mnt/ > # ll /mnt > # total 0 > drwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 0 Jan 12 00:00 before_live_cd_exp > dr-xr-xr-x. 1 root root 178 Dec 14 14:58 root > dr-xr-xr-x. 1 root root 178 Dec 14 14:58 stable_15_Dec > drw---. 1 root root 22 Dec 11 20:05 swap > > > Now to give you the output of the commands and the minor bad news: > > 1) btrfs check --repair /dev/mapper/dm_crypt > > This command actually executed and exited normally, but I could > see some errors at the end of the command. > > Full output of repair command over here: > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/17EQ5TYJE5a4iwRGTXXj9Hh38btxFBLAJ/view?usp=sharing > > 2) btrfs check --init-csum-tree /dev/mapper/dm_crypt > >This is where the minor bad news happens. > >This command exited with a "Segmentation Fault(Core Dumped)" > >Full output here: > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IYnLcw-vkZ2UeH0rOZje4kbhzB_tYaKy/view?usp=sharing > >I have my core dumps set to unlimited: > ># ulimit -a > core file size (blocks, -c) unlimited > data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited > scheduling priority (-e) 0 > file size (blocks, -f) unlimited > pending signals (-i) 31030 > max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 64 > max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited > open files (-n) 1024 > pipe size(512 bytes, -p) 8 > POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200 > real-time priority (-r) 0 > stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192 > cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited > max user processes (-u) 31030 > virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited > file locks (-x) unlimited > > But still I was unable to get coredump file as it was not generated: > > # coredumpctl list btrfs > TIMEPID UID GID SIG COREFILE EXE > Mon 2021-01-11 22:58:18 IST4337 0 0 11 none /usr/sbin/btrfs > > Which is weird. > > All the outputs are compressed using GZIP, let me know if you are > unable to download them. The repair command was run before the > init-csum-tree command. > > I have also used your enhanced version of btrfs-progs that you provided: > > # dnf repoquery --installed btrfs-progs > btrfs-progs-0:5.9+git20210108.3783313-0.fc33.1.x86_64 > > Let me know the next steps ie. Do you need BTRFS logs to diagnose the > root cause of the problem ? > > Thank you once again for your help and perseverance. Couldn't have > done it without you. Sorry missed to include the dmesg error for the init-csum-tree command: [34922.980911] btrfs[4337]: segfault at 60 ip 5625672ebf81 sp 7ffee2b38180 error 4 in btrfs[562567287000+96000] [34922.980939] Code: a0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e8 5c a3 ff ff 8b 4c 24 50 4c 89 fe 85 c0 0f 44 44 24 38 45 31 c0 89 44 24 38 48 8b 84 24 a0 00 00 0 0 <8b> 40 60 49 29 87 d0 00 00 00 6a 00 55 4c 8b 9c 24 90 00 00 00 48 [35498.885297] i915 :00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrun Guess it was caused by some sort of underrun. -- Regards, Sreyan Chakravarty ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: BTRFS partition corrupted after deleting files in /home
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 11:55 AM Chris Murphy wrote: > > > So thanks > for not giving up. > Actually it is me who should be thanking you for not giving up. For me giving up was not an option since that would involve me losing all my data. Thank you again for your time and patience, others would have told me to reinstall my OS or restore my backups. > sudo dnf install > https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ngompa/btrfsprogs-robustimg/fedora-33-x86_64/01873195-btrfs-progs/btrfs-progs-5.9+git20210108.3783313-0.fc33.1.x86_64.rpm > Ok, I finally have some good news and some minor bad news hopefully. Good news first. It worked, I can now mount my BTRFS root file system: # mount -t btrfs /dev/mapper/dm_crypt /mnt/ # ll /mnt # total 0 drwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 0 Jan 12 00:00 before_live_cd_exp dr-xr-xr-x. 1 root root 178 Dec 14 14:58 root dr-xr-xr-x. 1 root root 178 Dec 14 14:58 stable_15_Dec drw---. 1 root root 22 Dec 11 20:05 swap Now to give you the output of the commands and the minor bad news: 1) btrfs check --repair /dev/mapper/dm_crypt This command actually executed and exited normally, but I could see some errors at the end of the command. Full output of repair command over here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/17EQ5TYJE5a4iwRGTXXj9Hh38btxFBLAJ/view?usp=sharing 2) btrfs check --init-csum-tree /dev/mapper/dm_crypt This is where the minor bad news happens. This command exited with a "Segmentation Fault(Core Dumped)" Full output here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IYnLcw-vkZ2UeH0rOZje4kbhzB_tYaKy/view?usp=sharing I have my core dumps set to unlimited: # ulimit -a core file size (blocks, -c) unlimited data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited scheduling priority (-e) 0 file size (blocks, -f) unlimited pending signals (-i) 31030 max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 64 max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited open files (-n) 1024 pipe size(512 bytes, -p) 8 POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200 real-time priority (-r) 0 stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192 cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited max user processes (-u) 31030 virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited file locks (-x) unlimited But still I was unable to get coredump file as it was not generated: # coredumpctl list btrfs TIMEPID UID GID SIG COREFILE EXE Mon 2021-01-11 22:58:18 IST4337 0 0 11 none /usr/sbin/btrfs Which is weird. All the outputs are compressed using GZIP, let me know if you are unable to download them. The repair command was run before the init-csum-tree command. I have also used your enhanced version of btrfs-progs that you provided: # dnf repoquery --installed btrfs-progs btrfs-progs-0:5.9+git20210108.3783313-0.fc33.1.x86_64 Let me know the next steps ie. Do you need BTRFS logs to diagnose the root cause of the problem ? Thank you once again for your help and perseverance. Couldn't have done it without you. -- Regards, Sreyan Chakravarty ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Is it possible to create an email-only user in fedora linux?
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 01:24:46PM -0500, Bill Oliver wrote: > The only thing I know about is putting in a bashrc that limits their > PATH to their own /home//bin file for executables, and then > adding only the executables I want them to have. So, I guess I could > do that, and just put nothing in the /home//bin file. > > Is there a better way to do this? Yes. Give them a shell which is not listed in the file `/etc/shells`. There is a binary `/sbin/nologin` which is traditionally used for this purpose. sudo usermod -s /sbin/nologin username . If you need something more sophisticated than that, you should look at the PAM authentication stack -- it is possible to configure pretty much any service so that only users in certain groups are allowed, for example. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: BTRFS partition corrupted after deleting files in /home
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:55 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:54:07PM +0530, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > > > Sreyan, is the drive that this file system is on the same drive as in > > > this reported thread? > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/DJWIOXUOSAAHAAXSUTKREV452QDCXV3D/#6UDYNNWOC23NJKSLMIABSAU4QFYANSRB > > > > > > > Yes it is the same drive. > > Does that mean something is wrong with the drive ? > > It seems very likely -- either with the drive, or a cable, or the > controller, or some other aspect of your system. You're getting serious > errors regardless of what you're actually putting on the drive. > I beg to differ. I never faced problems like this when I was on "thick/older" LVM with EXT4. It is only when I switched to thin-pools and then to BTRFS that I started getting these problems. -- Regards, Sreyan Chakravarty ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Is it possible to create an email-only user in fedora linux?
So, I am setting up some forum software on a VPS server I have rented and would like to invite users to have access to the forum *and* an email account, but nothing else. I have dovecot set up, and make roundcube available as the web-based mail client. The only thing I know to do is to add them as a user, which basically gives them a shell, and I'm not enthusiastic about that. The only thing I know about is putting in a bashrc that limits their PATH to their own /home//bin file for executables, and then adding only the executables I want them to have. So, I guess I could do that, and just put nothing in the /home//bin file. Is there a better way to do this? Thanks, billo ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Any recent progress toward Fedora support for Raspberry Pi 4?
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:26:33AM -0600, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via users wrote: > > I have a Pi4 with 8G of RAM sitting in the corner of my desk gathering > dust waiting for a chance to run Fedora/ARM64. Officially it's not > supported: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi#Supported_Hardware > > >From time to time I hear rumors of upstream efforts to bring the Pi4 > into the supported fold, but not much recently. Can anyone shed any new > light on this? Probably worth following htis thread: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/a...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/BTCBRUNAFMUBM2NW23QH5NQ5IT3X6CN6/ I'm currently running the 4GB variant of the Raspberry Pi 4 with the stock aarch64 image, installed with 'fedora-arm-image-installer --target=rpi4 '. It doesn't have all the features but as a headless server, it works fine. -- Jonathan Billings ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Any recent progress toward Fedora support for Raspberry Pi 4?
I have a Pi4 with 8G of RAM sitting in the corner of my desk gathering dust waiting for a chance to run Fedora/ARM64. Officially it's not supported: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi#Supported_Hardware >From time to time I hear rumors of upstream efforts to bring the Pi4 into the supported fold, but not much recently. Can anyone shed any new light on this? --Doc Savage Fairview Heights, IL ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: BTRFS partition corrupted after deleting files in /home
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:54:07PM +0530, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > > Sreyan, is the drive that this file system is on the same drive as in > > this reported thread? > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/DJWIOXUOSAAHAAXSUTKREV452QDCXV3D/#6UDYNNWOC23NJKSLMIABSAU4QFYANSRB > > > > Yes it is the same drive. > Does that mean something is wrong with the drive ? It seems very likely -- either with the drive, or a cable, or the controller, or some other aspect of your system. You're getting serious errors regardless of what you're actually putting on the drive. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: microphone
If you look closely at the male plugin on your Combo Headset, it has one more separator ring and hence four separate (electrically that is) metal contacts. Pure headphones only have three. I found this out only recently when I tried to extend my combo headset with a regular 3.5mm cable, it didn't work. That is your issue ... Robert On 1/11/21 2:40 AM, edward via users wrote: On 1/11/2021 1:31 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: I have a Dell Optiplex 7060 There is only one jack sound plug. Dell says that I can use it as input or output. Head phone works perfectly. If I put a microphone, it is not recognized I checked that the Audio input/output are enable. I think they mean to be used with headphone mic combo. if that is what you are trying to use. maybe the chipset works only with windows codecs and software probably a usb external sound adapter that works with linux would be required? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: kde: unable to create io-slave
On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 08:59 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > Uh oh, looks like there is some breakage for latest kde update. When I try > to attach a file to an email I get a dialog box saying: > > unable to create io-slave: klauncher said: Error loading > '/usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/kf5/kio/file.so' There's a reason for not cross-posting: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#Do_not_Cross_Post This report already has several replies on the Fedora KDE list. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
xpdf
Hello, When I load xpdf (as a standard user), I get: "/proc/19969/root" or "/proc/20111/root" I can open the file but, I get this message every time now. What is wrong? Thanks === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 === ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: HandBrake & "Additional Fonts Required"
On 1/11/21 11:08 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > Where have you gotten HandBrake? > > I'm using > > HandBrake-gui-1.3.3-4.fc33.x86_64 > > from the rpmfusion repos without trouble. Hi, The same here from rpmfusion. I know ... I did the install on a fresh VM as well and I can't reproduce it :( -- Jorge ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: HandBrake & "Additional Fonts Required"
On 11/01/2021 22:49, Jorge Fábregas wrote: On 1/11/21 10:36 AM, Jorge Fábregas wrote: I'm in F33 and every time I open "HandBrake" I get a an "Additional Fonts Required" pop-up in the top ba I forgot to mention : - tried deleting $HOME/.config/ghb folder - tried creating a new user (to get fresh new environment) ...but in both cases I still get the message. Where have you gotten HandBrake? I'm using HandBrake-gui-1.3.3-4.fc33.x86_64 from the rpmfusion repos without trouble. --- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
audacity
Hello, I more or less solve my microphone issues (using the front face port), but audacity yields: error code: -9997 invalid sample rate What are the alternative to audacity? Thanks === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 === ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: HandBrake & "Additional Fonts Required"
On 1/11/21 10:36 AM, Jorge Fábregas wrote: > I'm in F33 and every time I open "HandBrake" I get a an "Additional > Fonts Required" pop-up in the top ba I forgot to mention : - tried deleting $HOME/.config/ghb folder - tried creating a new user (to get fresh new environment) ...but in both cases I still get the message. -- Jorge ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
HandBrake & "Additional Fonts Required"
Hi, I'm in F33 and every time I open "HandBrake" I get a an "Additional Fonts Required" pop-up in the top bar. I even tried opening it thru the terminal with "gdb -x" but I don't see anything related to fonts in the output. The fonts aren't available and the requested ones are ""Divehi;Dhiveh; Maldivian" (have no idea why is requesting such fonts). Does anyone knows how can I get rid of this? Thanks, Jorge ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: kde: unable to create io-slave
A little more info: Could not open library '/usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/kf5/kio/tags.so'. Cannot load library /usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/kf5/kio/tags.so: (/lib64/libKF5KIOCore.so.5: undefined symbol: _ZN10KFileUtils17makeSuggestedNameERK7QString) On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 8:59 AM Neal Becker wrote: > Uh oh, looks like there is some breakage for latest kde update. When I > try to attach a file to an email I get a dialog box saying: > > unable to create io-slave: klauncher said: Error loading > '/usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/kf5/kio/file.so' > > The usual file choosing dialog box is blank (no files shown). > > -- > *Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it* > -- *Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it* ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
kde: unable to create io-slave
Uh oh, looks like there is some breakage for latest kde update. When I try to attach a file to an email I get a dialog box saying: unable to create io-slave: klauncher said: Error loading '/usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/kf5/kio/file.so' The usual file choosing dialog box is blank (no files shown). -- *Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it* ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Compression on Btrfs
On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 17:08 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 4:09 PM Patrick O'Callaghan > wrote: > > > > > If you're using libvirt, creating a new pool on Btrfs will automatically > > > set +C attribute. > > > > It wasn't Btrfs at the time the image was created. > > Ahh gotcha. A proper conversion guide should point out this gotcha. > The work around might be chattr +C before the conversion, but I > haven't tested it. > > > > > > It's not possible to set this attribute once a file has data in it, it's > > > not retroactive. You'll need to duplicate the file, in that same > > > directory. > > > Because the directory has the attribute now, the duplicate will inherit > > > the > > > attribute. > > > > That's somewhat painful as the file is over 900GB and will need to be > > copied to another drive and then back again, but thanks anyway. > > As long as the cache mode is writeback or none, it'll be OK. Several hours later, it's done. Thanks again. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: microphone
Samuel Sieb: >> Usually when there's only one plug, it's a 4-pin jack. In order to >> use a microphone, you either need to have a headset or a splitter >> cable. Patrick Dupre: > Actually, I tried by using this kind of cable. > 4 connectins on the input jack, and > 2 "outputs": a green one for the headset, and a ping one for the > microphone. There are two completely incompatible ways that a 4 pole 3.5 mm TRRS jack can be used to carry combined headphone and microphone wiring. Starting from the tip end it could be: left, right, common ground, microphone (CTIA/Apple/most Android) Or: left, right, microphone, common ground (OMTP/Nokia/some Android/Sony) Headsets with the opposite type needed for the socket might actually get working audio in the earpieces, but not the microphone. Since you're using an adaptor lead, you may have the opposite kind from what you need. If you can work out which one you have, try getting the opposite. If you can't work out what you have, you have two choices: Get someone else to determine it, or buy a pair of new adaptor leads (one of each type). But I'd suggest you try taking what you already have (headset and and adaptors) to a mobile phone shop, or computer shop, and see if they can help you. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1160.11.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 18 16:34:56 UTC 2020 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: microphone
Patrick, Edward said: > probably a usb external sound adapter that works with linux > would be required? You can get some nice USB headsets that simply come with a USB plug on the end, ready to go. It works well here. Jonathan ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: microphone
On 1/11/2021 1:31 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: I have a Dell Optiplex 7060 There is only one jack sound plug. Dell says that I can use it as input or output. Head phone works perfectly. If I put a microphone, it is not recognized I checked that the Audio input/output are enable. I think they mean to be used with headphone mic combo. if that is what you are trying to use. maybe the chipset works only with windows codecs and software probably a usb external sound adapter that works with linux would be required? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: BTRFS partition corrupted after deleting files in /home
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021, 3:29 pm Chris Murphy, wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021, 12:22 AM Sreyan Chakravarty > wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 2:11 AM Matthew Miller >> wrote: >> > >> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 02:01:56AM +0530, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: >> > > If I don't have ECC does that mean I shouldn't use BTRFS ? >> > >> > The chance of data corruption due to memory errors is rare, but it does >> > happen. If it happened and you were using ext4, the result wouldn't be >> that >> > everything is fine, it's that you'd have corrupted data -- hopefully not >> > important, but... you won't know. >> > >> > Now, I don't think btrfs's current state of "now your system won't boot >> and >> > you need to be an expert to figure out what's going on" is ideal >> either, but >> > it's a rare situation and recovery tools will improve. >> > >> >> With the amount of time that Chris and everyone else put into this, I >> just hope this bug is fixed for good. >> > > > No bug has been identified. > > Have you gone through the numbered list and tried to repair? It is > important you install specifically the btrfs-progs in that email. It has an > enhancement for this particular kind of damage. > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4G52PRZ4ETFSXCSOJYFBGP6H64FRSRZT/ > Yes I have installed the specific version of btrfs-progs that you have shared. But the repair has been running for over 3 hours now. I do have a 930 GiB partition. > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] Re: impact of the CentOS Stream drama
> The 'core team' does not have much involvement in the debian 389-ds > packaging process, but the debian maintainer has always been > responsive and done a great job from what I am able to observe. I > would expect there to be "very little" difference between debian and > centos 389-ds packages. > > Additionally, you could also consider opensuse leap and/or suse linux > enterprise if you want paid support (disclosure - I work for suse > and am paid to maintain 389-ds in those distributions). > thanks a lot for your detailed response. I'm more a Debian guy but I'm willing to test opensuse. best regards, abosch -- Institut Mallorqui d'Afers Socials. Aquest missatge, i si escau, qualsevol fitxer annex, es dirigeix exclusivament a la persona que n'es destinataria i pot contenir informacio confidencial. En cap cas no heu de copiar aquest missatge ni lliurar-lo a terceres persones sense permis expres de l'IMAS. Si no sou la persona destinataria que s'hi indica (o la responsable de lliurar-l'hi) us demanam que ho notifiqueu immediatament a l'adreca electronica de la persona remitent. Abans d'imprimir aquest missatge, pensau si es realment necessari. ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: BTRFS partition corrupted after deleting files in /home
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021, 12:22 AM Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 2:11 AM Matthew Miller > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 02:01:56AM +0530, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > > > If I don't have ECC does that mean I shouldn't use BTRFS ? > > > > The chance of data corruption due to memory errors is rare, but it does > > happen. If it happened and you were using ext4, the result wouldn't be > that > > everything is fine, it's that you'd have corrupted data -- hopefully not > > important, but... you won't know. > > > > Now, I don't think btrfs's current state of "now your system won't boot > and > > you need to be an expert to figure out what's going on" is ideal either, > but > > it's a rare situation and recovery tools will improve. > > > > With the amount of time that Chris and everyone else put into this, I > just hope this bug is fixed for good. > No bug has been identified. Have you gone through the numbered list and tried to repair? It is important you install specifically the btrfs-progs in that email. It has an enhancement for this particular kind of damage. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4G52PRZ4ETFSXCSOJYFBGP6H64FRSRZT/ -- Chris Murphy ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: microphone
> Subject: Re: microphone > > On 1/11/21 1:31 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > I have a Dell Optiplex 7060 > > There is only one jack sound plug. > > Dell says that I can use it as input or output. > > Head phone works perfectly. > > If I put a microphone, it is not recognized > > I checked that the Audio input/output are enable. > > Usually when there's only one plug, it's a 4-pin jack. In order to use > a microphone, you either need to have a headset or a splitter cable. > That's the only way that you will get the microphone signal to the right > spot. > ___ Actually, I tried by using this kind of cable. 4 connectins on the input jack, and 2 "outputs": a green one for the headset, and a ping one for the microphone. But it do es not work (only the headset works). ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: microphone
On 1/11/21 1:31 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: I have a Dell Optiplex 7060 There is only one jack sound plug. Dell says that I can use it as input or output. Head phone works perfectly. If I put a microphone, it is not recognized I checked that the Audio input/output are enable. Usually when there's only one plug, it's a 4-pin jack. In order to use a microphone, you either need to have a headset or a splitter cable. That's the only way that you will get the microphone signal to the right spot. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: microphone
Audio: Device-1: Intel Cannon Lake PCH cAVS vendor: Dell driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel bus ID: 00:1f.3 Sound Server: ALSA v: k5.9.16-100.fc32.x86_64 > > Hello, > > I have a Dell Optiplex 7060 > There is only one jack sound plug. > Dell says that I can use it as input or output. > Head phone works perfectly. > If I put a microphone, it is not recognized > I checked that the Audio input/output are enable. > > Why? > > Do I need to install something else? > > Thanks > > === > Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com > Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne > 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE > Tel: +33 (0)380395988 > === ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
microphone
Hello, I have a Dell Optiplex 7060 There is only one jack sound plug. Dell says that I can use it as input or output. Head phone works perfectly. If I put a microphone, it is not recognized I checked that the Audio input/output are enable. Why? Do I need to install something else? Thanks === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 === ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
