Re: Fedora 30 upgrade - Am I right with this error conclusion?
On 30/04/2019 21:49, Ulf Volmer wrote: > Certbot on fedora 29 and also on 30 is based on python3 instead of > python2. So I'm surpriced about your issues. I think you can safely > remove the packages. Or add --allowerasing to the 'dnf system-upgrade > download' command. > > Best regards > Ulf > ___ Ok, I went with adding the --allowerasing option. Everything went through cleanly and 'certbot renew --dry-run' gives no errors. Thanks for the solution :) ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 30 upgrade - Am I right with this error conclusion?
Hi all, Despite what I said in another thread I decided to go ahead with the upgrade to Fedora 30 (from 29) on three VMs running under VMWare. Two went without problems, but the one running my webserver (with sites secured by LetsEncrypt) gives the following errors - Error: Problem 1: package python2-acme-0.31.0-1.fc29.noarch requires python2-josepy, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-josepy-1.1.0-6.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-acme-0.31.0-1.fc29.noarch Problem 2: package python2-certbot-dns-rfc2136-0.31.0-1.fc29.noarch requires python2-certbot >= 0.21.1, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-certbot-0.31.0-2.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-certbot-dns-rfc2136-0.31.0-1.fc29.noarch (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) I'm assuming I just need to wait for Certbot and its dependencies to catch up, or is there a quicker way? Thanks for looking ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F30 - has it officially been released?
On 30/04/2019 18:39, Max Pyziur wrote: > > Per the subject line, I see that there is this announcement > (https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-fedora-30/), but after starting > the upgrade and downloading the packages, the upgrade made no progress. > > Usually, the announcement of a new release is made with an email > blast, which as yet, I haven't received. > > Is the F30 release official? > > Max Pyziur > p...@brama.com > ___ If you Google 'Fedora 30' you'll see many press releases, but it seems some people are having trouble with the upgrade (see the post below this one). In my opinion (and it is only my opinion) it's best to wait a few weeks after release before considering upgrading ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mysqld refuses to start after upgrade to Fedora 29
On 11/12/2018 12:37 am, Rick Stevens wrote: Yup. Some of those are fixable via mysql_upgrade, others are fairly important and appear to be caused by using a newer mysqld that's not backwards compatible with your previous version. You didn't say which version of MySQL you were running before and whether 8.0.13 was compatible with it. Generally, the website has info on what's compatible and how to convert from old to new. mysql_upgrade seems to have done the trick - 2018-12-11T10:35:31.114349Z 0 [System] [MY-010910] [Server] /usr/libexec/mysqld: Shutdown complete (mysqld 8.0.13) Source distribution. 2018-12-11T10:35:31.627020Z 0 [System] [MY-010116] [Server] /usr/libexec/mysqld (mysqld 8.0.13) starting as process 7131 2018-12-11T10:35:33.197087Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010068] [Server] CA certificate ca.pem is self signed. 2018-12-11T10:35:33.217669Z 0 [System] [MY-010931] [Server] /usr/libexec/mysqld: ready for connections. Version: '8.0.13' socket: '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' port: 3306 Source distribution. 2018-12-11T10:35:33.343046Z 0 [System] [MY-011323] [Server] X Plugin ready for connections. Socket: '/var/lib/mysql/mysqlx.sock' bind-address: '::' port: 33060 Thanks so much for your help Rick ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mysqld refuses to start after upgrade to Fedora 29
On 11/12/2018 12:37 am, Rick Stevens wrote: Also, how did you get it to start? Once I found the right log file I saw that there were a few incompatible entries in my.cnf I'll take a look at the other errors when I'm awake :) ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mysqld refuses to start after upgrade to Fedora 29
Managed to get it going (found another log file I didn't know existed!!). Websites are back up now but it looks like I have much work to do judging by logged errors - 2018-12-11T00:23:09.838450Z 0 [System] [MY-010116] [Server] /usr/libexec/mysqld (mysqld 8.0.13) starting as process 5200 2018-12-11T00:23:11.373458Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010068] [Server] CA certificate ca.pem is self signed. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.384224Z 0 [ERROR] [MY-013129] [Server] A message intended for a client cannot be sent there as no client-session is attached. Therefore, we're sending the information to the error-log instead: MY-001146 - Table 'mysql.component' doesn't exist 2018-12-11T00:23:11.384307Z 0 [Warning] [MY-013129] [Server] A message intended for a client cannot be sent there as no client-session is attached. Therefore, we're sending the information to the error-log instead: MY-003543 - The mysql.component table is missing or has an incorrect definition. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.455427Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010929] [Server] Storage engine 'MyISAM' does not support system tables. [mysql.user]. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.455478Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010929] [Server] Storage engine 'MyISAM' does not support system tables. [mysql.db]. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.455487Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010929] [Server] Storage engine 'MyISAM' does not support system tables. [mysql.tables_priv]. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.455495Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010929] [Server] Storage engine 'MyISAM' does not support system tables. [mysql.columns_priv]. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.455503Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010929] [Server] Storage engine 'MyISAM' does not support system tables. [mysql.procs_priv]. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.455511Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010929] [Server] Storage engine 'MyISAM' does not support system tables. [mysql.proxies_priv]. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.456005Z 0 [ERROR] [MY-013143] [Server] Column count of mysql.user is wrong. Expected 50, found 45. The table is probably corrupted 2018-12-11T00:23:11.456042Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010966] [Server] ACL table mysql.role_edges missing. Some operations may fail. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.456050Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010966] [Server] ACL table mysql.default_roles missing. Some operations may fail. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.456058Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010966] [Server] ACL table mysql.global_grants missing. Some operations may fail. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.456065Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010966] [Server] ACL table mysql.password_history missing. Some operations may fail. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.458828Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010315] [Server] 'user' entry 'root@localhost' ignored in --skip-name-resolve mode. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.458886Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010315] [Server] 'user' entry 'mysql.session@localhost' ignored in --skip-name-resolve mode. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.458903Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010315] [Server] 'user' entry 'mysql.sys@localhost' ignored in --skip-name-resolve mode. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.458920Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010315] [Server] 'user' entry 'rtadmin@localhost' ignored in --skip-name-resolve mode. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.458936Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010315] [Server] 'user' entry 'multi_admin@localhost' ignored in --skip-name-resolve mode. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.459128Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010323] [Server] 'db' entry 'performance_schema mysql.session@localhost' ignored in --skip-name-resolve mode. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.459145Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010323] [Server] 'db' entry 'sys mysql.sys@localhost' ignored in --skip-name-resolve mode. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.459155Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010323] [Server] 'db' entry 'rt rtadmin@localhost' ignored in --skip-name-resolve mode. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.459165Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010323] [Server] 'db' entry 'trisect\_multi multi_admin@localhost' ignored in --skip-name-resolve mode. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.459306Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010311] [Server] 'proxies_priv' entry '@ root@localhost' ignored in --skip-name-resolve mode. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.459325Z 0 [ERROR] [MY-010965] [Server] Missing system table mysql.global_grants; please run mysql_upgrade to create it. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.463177Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010330] [Server] 'tables_priv' entry 'user mysql.session@localhost' ignored in --skip-name-resolve mode. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.463210Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010330] [Server] 'tables_priv' entry 'sys_config mysql.sys@localhost' ignored in --skip-name-resolve mode. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.465057Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010727] [Server] System table 'func' is expected to be transactional. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.467349Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010405] [Repl] Info table is not ready to be used. Table 'mysql.slave_master_info' cannot be opened. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.467390Z 0 [ERROR] [MY-010422] [Repl] Error in checking mysql.slave_master_info repository info type of TABLE. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.467404Z 0 [ERROR] [MY-010415] [Repl] Error creating master info: Error checking repositories. 2018-12-11T00:23:11.467413Z 0 [ERROR] [MY-010426] [Repl] Slave: Failed to initialize the master info structure for channel ''; its record may still be present in 'mysql.slave_master_info' table, consider deleting it.
Re: Mysqld refuses to start after upgrade to Fedora 29
On 10/12/2018 11:48 pm, Rick Stevens wrote: On 12/10/18 3:32 PM, Danny Horne via users wrote: On 10/12/2018 11:26 pm, Rick Stevens wrote: Keep in mind that you're really running mariadb and the command to start it is "systemctl start mariadb" even though the daemon will show up as mysqld in a process list. [root@hawking ~]# systemctl start mariadb Failed to start mariadb.service: Unit mariadb.service not found. Well, that's interesting. Do you have the mariadb-server RPM installed or are you actually running mysqld (from their community download)? I'm running community-mysql-server from the Fedora repo. Very late here so don't want to mess around switching to MariaDB, do you think that will cause more problems if I do? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mysqld refuses to start after upgrade to Fedora 29
On 10/12/2018 11:26 pm, Rick Stevens wrote: Keep in mind that you're really running mariadb and the command to start it is "systemctl start mariadb" even though the daemon will show up as mysqld in a process list. [root@hawking ~]# systemctl start mariadb Failed to start mariadb.service: Unit mariadb.service not found. Nothing useful in the logs? Try journalctl -b0 | egrep '(maria|mysql)' and see if anything shows up. Dec 10 23:30:44 hawking.trisect.uk systemd[1]: mysqld.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE Dec 10 23:30:44 hawking.trisect.uk systemd[1]: mysqld.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. Dec 10 23:30:44 hawking.trisect.uk audit[1]: SERVICE_START pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='unit=mysqld comm="systemd" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? addr=? terminal=? res=failed' ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Mysqld refuses to start after upgrade to Fedora 29
Hi all, Hope I can find an answer here because I don't know where else to ask. I've just upgraded from Fedora 28 to Fedora 29 and mysqld (version 8.0.13) won't start. There's nothing useful in the logs so I've no idea where to look for a solution. Was working fine in Fedora 28. Thanks for looking ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Software to create bootable USB stick
On 29/08/18 14:11, Bryce Hardy wrote: > > > > I'm running Fedora Workstation 28. What software can I use to install a > downloaded OS .ISO onto a USB stick so the OS can be installed on > another machine? > > There are many others but install the mediawriter package to get the > official Fedora utility. > > Tried this, but it doesn't appear to have made it bootable ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Software to create bootable USB stick
On 29/08/18 14:19, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Well, you should be able to simply run "dd" to dump the image onto > your USB drive, if you figure out which /dev/sdX represents your USB > stick (and not your main hard drive). > > That's the tricky part: not accidentally wiping out your existing system. > > Actually, figuring out what /dev/* to use was the easy bit, figuring out dd's options was hard!! Bryce's suggestion of Fedora Media Writer seems to be doing the trick, won't be sure until I actually try booting to it. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Software to create bootable USB stick
On 29/08/18 11:29, Danny Horne via users wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm running Fedora Workstation 28. What software can I use to install a > downloaded OS .ISO onto a USB stick so the OS can be installed on > another machine? > > Thanks for looking > ___ > Additional info I've tried Brasero and Wodim, neither recognises my USB drive (even though it's mounted), and both say the ISO is too large to burn onto a DVD ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Software to create bootable USB stick
Hi all, I'm running Fedora Workstation 28. What software can I use to install a downloaded OS .ISO onto a USB stick so the OS can be installed on another machine? Thanks for looking ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Adding subnet to firewalld drop zone
On 08/08/18 23:27, Dirk Gottschalk via users wrote: > You have to find out whi issues the query. I would disable recursion at > all except for the internal network. > > Find out who queries this domains and answer witth NXDOMAIN, disabling > recursion would do thos. Blocking DNS queries if you are authotitative > for internet domains is generally a very bad idea. > > Regards, > Dirk > > Ok, been doing some more digging (pardon the pun), and after turning on query logging I've found out that it's my own DNS server making the query, and Barracuda's DNS is causing the 'connection refused' error. Need to find out now why my DNS is querying Barracuda's DNS. I run Postfix on this server with a bunch of add-ons, so it's possible one of those might be the cause. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KWCAKCUYPDNWIZXYZ45FQDF22MGFLKLZ/
Re: Adding subnet to firewalld drop zone
On 08/08/18 23:27, Dirk Gottschalk via users wrote: > No, this is the queried DNS. It is the authoritative NS for the Domain > barracudacentral.org. > > Seems to be some kind of reverse entry which does not resolve > correctly. The Source for the query is not mentioned. The authotitative > can not resolve this query (tested) and therefore the query is answered > with code NXDOMAIN. > > You have to find out whi issues the query. I would disable recursion at > all except for the internal network. > > Find out who queries this domains and answer witth NXDOMAIN, disabling > recursion would do thos. Blocking DNS queries if you are authotitative > for internet domains is generally a very bad idea. > > Regards, > Dirk > > Recursion is disabled (only allowed on localhost), which is why it logs 'connection refused'. How do I find out who's making the query (using bind 9.11.4)? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TY5VRWP62YKCDWW5FV65OD3FPGTIM2MO/
Adding subnet to firewalld drop zone
Hi all, I've been trying to add a subnet to my firewalld drop zone because queries from this subnet have been filling up my named logs and I've had enough!! Based on research these are some assumptions I've made - Adding a subnet to a zone makes it an active zone Zones with subnets take precedence over those with interfaces attached connection refused resolving '243.32.237.94.bb.barracudacentral.org/A/IN': 64.235.145.15#53 << In this example 64.235.145.15 is the source IP (am I right?) This is what I've done to try and achieve what I want - firewall-cmd --permanent --zone=drop --add-source=64.235.144.0/20 (I've researched this, subnet is correct) firewall-cmd --reload I'm still getting queries to my DNS servers from this subnet though, what have I missed? Thanks for looking ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KSBPXKD7QQE4I2ZWDLLM3W4N5TM2RA7Z/
Re: Timezone question
On 17/07/18 12:37, Ed Greshko wrote: > Also, check /etc/timezone, normally a symlink to the desired system >>> default timezone file. >>> >> Not sure if this has changed in Fedora 28, but I don't have >> /etc/timezone on any of my servers. I've previously seen it before, as >> either a symlink to a file in /usr/share/zoneinfo, or a file from that >> directory copied to /etc/timezone. >> >> Not sure if I have a problem in that area or not. > The link is not /etc/timezone but /etc/localtime > Thanks for the clarification Ed, all my servers show /etc/localtime as a symlink to the correct timezone signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2DYQBHZTFJZVCVIUO7PNEAF5SGK7ID4W/
Re: Timezone question
On 17/07/18 12:05, Cameron Simpson wrote: > What's in the environment? I like "env | sort". This nailed it, for some reason (don't ask why, I just don't know), but I placed 'export TZ=UTC' in .bashrc. Removing this and logging in again now shows the correct timezone when using 'date'. > > Also, check /etc/timezone, normally a symlink to the desired system > default timezone file. > Not sure if this has changed in Fedora 28, but I don't have /etc/timezone on any of my servers. I've previously seen it before, as either a symlink to a file in /usr/share/zoneinfo, or a file from that directory copied to /etc/timezone. Not sure if I have a problem in that area or not. Thanks for the reply ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RFN3BT5S3MM4CVV65GRMVWWBYOMUNRNN/
Timezone question
Hi all, I recently changed my Fedora 28 servers from UTC to Europe/London timezone, so now it's displaying times in BST (British Summer Time). Come October this will change to GMT (Greenwich Mean Time). 1) Will the timezone change automatically (account for the hours difference)? 2) Will rsyslog continue to post log times as BST or will it automatically change to GMT without having to restart it? I've also just discovered a weird problem. I have three servers all configured for Europe/London timezone. Two show times in BST when using the 'date' command, but one still shows as UTC (see below). What have I missed? [root@kepler ~]# date Tue 17 Jul 11:42:53 BST 2018 [root@kepler ~]# [root@kepler ~]# timedatectl Local time: Tue 2018-07-17 11:42:56 BST Universal time: Tue 2018-07-17 10:42:56 UTC RTC time: Tue 2018-07-17 10:42:56 Time zone: Europe/London (BST, +0100) System clock synchronized: yes systemd-timesyncd.service active: yes RTC in local TZ: no [root@hawking log]# date Tue 17 Jul 10:43:07 UTC 2018 [root@hawking log]# [root@hawking log]# timedatectl Local time: Tue 2018-07-17 11:43:10 BST Universal time: Tue 2018-07-17 10:43:10 UTC RTC time: Tue 2018-07-17 10:43:10 Time zone: Europe/London (BST, +0100) System clock synchronized: yes systemd-timesyncd.service active: yes RTC in local TZ: no Thanks for looking ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6YREZC3UWDHPZRVG4FUCACZHFIAVCGZK/
Re: OT: Annoying List Behavior....
On 04/06/18 18:56, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Oh, this is fun! I use Thunderbird and run my own mail server. I > checked message source and for this message from you I find: > > From: Danny Horne via users > Cc: Danny Horne > > > So something is rewriting the from, most likely the list server. > > ___ I thought all list servers did that as a matter of course (p.s. I run my own mail server to with strict DMARC settings) ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GDW7X4YYNSGIR5JS35LACPMSZNKEJPLW/
Re: OT: Annoying List Behavior....
On 04/06/18 16:55, Mike Wright wrote: > What I'd like to know is: what does my sender address look like to > other recipients? is it "Mike Wright", or is it some generic Fedora > address? What does THIS post display on your thunderbird client as the > "Correspondent"? > > Thanks to any helpers. > ___ You are Mike Wright on my Thunderbird ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QAFOEKF6BTL32LWTTR2622YWFARKJFCA/
Re: Safe to reinstall kernel?
On 07/05/18 18:10, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: > Hi. > > On Mon, 07 May 2018 11:33:42 -0500 Roger Heflin wrote: > >> Multiple versions of kernels are installed, so you will have to >> explicitly give it the version you want it to reinstall. > And the kernel is split in many RPMs. > > I suspect that the posttrans scripts of the kernel-core and/or > kernel-modules RPMs haven't been done due to the hard reset. > > Try that: > > rel= > dnf reinstall kernel-core-$rel kernel-modules-$rel > > You may try also to only run the posttrans scripts of those RPMs. > > See: rpm -q --scripts kernel-core-$rel kernel-modules-$rel > Thanks, reinstalling as you've described has fixed the issue, now booting to 4.16.6 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Safe to reinstall kernel?
On 07/05/18 15:37, Roger Heflin wrote: > Reinstalling any rpms you have a reason to suspect have issues should > be just fine. I have personally reinstalled the kernel rpm a number > of times when the update aborted before completion. > > Tried 'dnf reinstall kernel' and that hasn't changed anything. Still no 4.16.6 kernel in the /boot directory and 4.16.5 is the latest listed in /boot/grub2/grub.cfg ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Safe to reinstall kernel?
Hi all, A few days ago I updated through dnfdragora, that update included kernel 4.16.6. Some way through the update my PC froze, and after leaving it for a while decided the only option was a hard reset. The PC still boots to kernel 4.16.5, and there's no trace of 4.16.6 in the /boot directory. DNF reports that kernel, kernel-core, kernel-modules and kernel-modules-extra are installed (all 4.16.6). Would it be safe to reinstall the kernel? Or is there a better way to get things up to date? Thanks for looking ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 28 today?
On 01/05/18 18:10, Rex Dieter wrote: > Danny Horne via users wrote: > >> I'm sure I saw in the list that OpenSSL would be upgraded to >> 1.1.1, mine still shows as 1.1.0 > f28 currently includes openssl-1.1.0h-3.fc28 > > -- Rex > Sorry, misread what I saw 2018-05-01T14:51:42Z DEBUG ---> Package openssl.x86_64 1:1.1.0h-3.fc27 will be upgraded 2018-05-01T14:51:42Z DEBUG ---> Package openssl.x86_64 1:1.1.0h-3.fc28 will be an upgrade I'll go and sit in the corner now :) ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 28 today?
On 01/05/18 16:47, Charlie Dennett wrote: > and the Fedora wiki page for dnf system upgrade still has 27 as the > most recent stable release. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade > > I've upgraded using that method for the last several releases and not > had any issues. > > -- > Charlie > A few issues for me - For some reason the upgrade disabled Postfix startup in Systemd and although I'm sure I saw in the list that OpenSSL would be upgraded to 1.1.1, mine still shows as 1.1.0 Not major issues but ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 28 today?
On 01/05/18 14:48, Ed Greshko wrote: > Or, just look at https://getfedora.org/ and see. > Fedora 28 released! Get it now > > The software updater on Workstation has picked up on the new version, laptop updated, just waiting for the PC, then three servers to upgrade ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 28 today?
On 01/05/18 12:32, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On the Announce list, and usually copied here as well. > poc > ___ > Thanks ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 28 today?
Just checked the release schedule, and target #1 has been crossed off the list, meaning (by my understanding) that today is the confirmed release date. Anyone know if an official announcement will be made here? If not, where are official announcements made? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Weird repo problem [CLOSED!!]
Ok, I feel really stupid now!! Because updating Wine broke stuff (and I've never figured out why) I configured DNF a long time ago to ignore wine* so it hopefully wouldn't show up in updates. It stopped it showing up in dnfdragora, but something else (Software app?) always found it and I finally let it update Wine. DNF fixed, Wine fixed ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Weird repo problem
Hi all, I have a PC and laptop both running Fedora 27 Workstation and both fully updated, they both have an identical set of repos installed and enabled. The only difference is the PC has Wine installed. For reasons I won't go into I have to reinstall Wine occasionally but I can't find it in either the 'Software' app or via dnf, dnf doesn't show any of the core Wine packages. Trying 'dnf search wine' on the laptop shows Wine and all it's ancillary packages, but nothing is showing on the PC so I can't uninstall or do anything with it. I've tried 'dnf clean all' but that doesn't help. Anyone any clues what's going on? Thanks for looking ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Switching to Wayland on F27
On 19/04/18 04:50, Digimer wrote: > Hi all, > > I've updated my OS a few times now and it would appear that I am still > on Xorg of Fedora 27 workstation; > > Any hint on how to enable Wayland? > > Thanks. > I had to switch from Wayland to Xorg a while back. Edit /etc/gdm/custom.conf and make sure WaylandEnable=false is commented out ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Getting started with firewalld
On 17/04/18 20:12, Chris Adams wrote: > I am trying to get a handle on firewalld... I can't actually see right > off how to limit access to services to certain sources. For example, on > a single-interface server, I want to limit access to SSH and SNMP to > some "management" networks. With iptables, I might have: > >*filter >:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] >:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] >:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] >:mgmt - [0:0] > >-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT >-A INPUT -p tcp --syn --dport http -j ACCEPT >-A INPUT -p tcp --syn --dport ssh -j mgmt >-A INPUT -p udp --dport snmp -j mgmt > >-A mgmt -s 10.0.0.0/24 -j ACCEPT >-A mgmt -s 10.1.0.0/24 -j ACCEPT >-A mgmt -p tcp -j REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset >-A mgmt -j DROP > > That means a couple of subnets can reach whatever management services I > declare, the rest of the network cannot, and HTTP is just wide open. > > I set a bunch of different documents talking about assigning interfaces > and services to zones, but nothing that tells me how to use those zones > to do something useful. > Here's how I'd set up limited access to SSH and SNMP firewall-cmd --permanent --add-source=10.0.0.0/24 --zone=trusted firewall-cmd --permanent --add-source=10.1.0.0/24 --zone=trusted firewall-cmd --permanent --zone=trusted --add-service=ssh --add-service=snmp firewall-cmd --permanent --zone=public --remove-service=ssh --remove-service=snmp firewall-cmd --reload The 'zone=public' bit, that's my internet facing zone, to figure out which zones are allowing what, run firewall-cmd --list-all-zones and adjust the commands I posted accordingly to add / remove anything Hope this helps ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: 4% battery; dpesn't suspend
On 16/04/18 08:41, Dave Mitchell wrote: > F27. I ran a new laptop battery down to 4% (as claimed by gnome) and my > laptop didn't auto-suspend, nor hibernate. > > In settings / power, the only option for battery power these days seems to > be to automatically suspend after a set time period; not at a certain > battery level. > > So > > a) did I imagine it that earlier fedoras used to have this feature? > b) any way I can enable auto-suspect on low battery for F27? > > Take a look at an earlier question I asked, 'Power settings wrong or battery dying', particularly the answers from Robbi Nespu. Might help you ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: NFS server setup -
On 13/04/18 20:34, Bob Goodwin wrote: > . > > I am attempting to set up an NFS server on a new Fedora 27 computer I > have assembled using instructions I found, "Fedora > Administration_Guide_Draft/NFS" and I am having a problem accessing it. > > $ cat /etc/exports > /var/ftp/pub 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0(ro) > /home/public 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0(rw) > > var/ftp/pub 192.168.54.0/255.255.255.0(ro,sync,no_subtree_check) > > /var/ftp/pub > 192.168.54.0/255.255.255.0(ro,sync,no_wdelay,no_subtree_check,nohide) > > Then from the client I get a refusal: > > # mount 192.168.1.86:/home/public /mnt/test/ > mount.nfs: Connection refused > > There is an ethernet path between them on my lan, ssh works from each > computer to the other ... > > Perhaps a problem with bind, I don't know how to troubleshoot this, > would appreciate suggestions. > > Bob > Sorry, meant to say firewall ports ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: NFS server setup -
On 13/04/18 20:34, Bob Goodwin wrote: > . > > I am attempting to set up an NFS server on a new Fedora 27 computer I > have assembled using instructions I found, "Fedora > Administration_Guide_Draft/NFS" and I am having a problem accessing it. > > $ cat /etc/exports > /var/ftp/pub 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0(ro) > /home/public 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0(rw) > > var/ftp/pub 192.168.54.0/255.255.255.0(ro,sync,no_subtree_check) > > /var/ftp/pub > 192.168.54.0/255.255.255.0(ro,sync,no_wdelay,no_subtree_check,nohide) > > Then from the client I get a refusal: > > # mount 192.168.1.86:/home/public /mnt/test/ > mount.nfs: Connection refused > > There is an ethernet path between them on my lan, ssh works from each > computer to the other ... > > Perhaps a problem with bind, I don't know how to troubleshoot this, > would appreciate suggestions. > > Bob > Not an expert myself, but I can't see anything there that says you've opened up the NFS ports on the NFS server ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Windows eats Fedora installation USB stick
On 13/04/18 18:10, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: > Sometimes when I try to install Fedora, Windows eats my installation > USB stick. > > Fedora is distributed as a .iso (a CD/DVD image). This image is cleverly > designed such that if you dump it, byte for byte, onto a USB stick (not > into a filesystem), you get a stick that can be booted. > > Back in my Windows days I always used a program called Rufus to created bootable USB sticks from ISO's. Never had any problems with corruption on them https://rufus.akeo.ie/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Power settings wrong or battery dying?
On 12/04/18 12:51, Robbi Nespu wrote: > > Well, I could be you battery is dying. This is mine output which has > time to empty and my battery capacity are going down also (last time I > check, it was more than 60%. > > present: yes > state: discharging > time to empty: 2.0 hours > percentage: 90% > capacity:54.4318% > technology: lithium-ion > > Here's mine shortly after unplugging power after full recharge, not looking good for the battery :) present: yes state: discharging time to empty: 1.2 hours percentage: 96% capacity: 45.6019% technology: lithium-ion ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Power settings wrong or battery dying?
On 12/04/18 09:18, Robbi Nespu wrote: > How much of battery capacity percent you have right now? > Try to check with this: > > $ upower -i /org/freedesktop/UPower/devices/battery_BAT0| grep > --color=NEVER -E "present|state|to\ full|percentage|capacity|time\ to > empty|time\ to full|technology" > > paste down here, it would be interesting to take a look > > First reading, plugged in, fully charged. Second reading, on battery power. If I'm reading it right the battery has lost capacity over it's lifetime. present: yes state: fully-charged percentage: 100% capacity: 45.6019% technology: lithium-ion present: yes state: discharging percentage: 99% capacity: 45.6019% technology: lithium-ion ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Power settings wrong or battery dying?
On 11/04/18 17:52, Danny Horne via users wrote: > On 11/04/18 17:48, Dave Stevens wrote: >> On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 17:41:50 +0100 >> Danny Horne via users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> >> if you pop the battery out for a day does the same thing happen? >> >> d >> > Just popped the battery, I'll report back in 24 hours > ___ > Well the battery has been out for about 15 hours and the laptop claims it's fully charged, but also says it has less than an hour to run ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Power settings wrong or battery dying?
On 11/04/18 18:26, Dave Stevens wrote: > On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 18:12:04 +0100 > Danny Horne via users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> From comments received so far it's looking like a battery replacement. > why not do the test first and spend the money later? > > d > ___ > I have no intentions of spending any money just yet!! If it needs a new battery it's going to have to wait. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Power settings wrong or battery dying?
On 11/04/18 18:03, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 04/11/2018 09:54 AM, Danny Horne via users wrote: >> On 11/04/18 17:49, Samuel Sieb wrote: >>> If it's turned right off, then Fedora has nothing to do with it. >> >> That's the thing, I'm not sure if I've missed something in the power >> settings and it's just going into standby or some other power saving >> mode > > Are all the lights off? Did you just close the lid, or did you select > "Turn Off" from the menu? If the latter, you should have had a black > screen with a Fedora label, then completely black. When you start it > back up, do you still have the applications running that you had > before or do you have to start them again? When you turn it back on, > do you have to click on your username or is it just asking for a > password? > ___ Light appears to be off (looks dim in sunlight but I'm sure it's off). I select 'Shut Down' when switching off and when it's powered up again it goes through the whole boot process and I select my account and log in. From comments received so far it's looking like a battery replacement. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Power settings wrong or battery dying?
On 11/04/18 17:54, wwp wrote: > Of course you don't have any USB device still plugged in and draining? > Some laptops are configured to keep some of the USB plugs powered even > if computer is switched off. > > > Regards, > Nothing plugged in except (usually) the charger signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Power settings wrong or battery dying?
On 11/04/18 17:49, Samuel Sieb wrote: > If it's turned right off, then Fedora has nothing to do with it. That's the thing, I'm not sure if I've missed something in the power settings and it's just going into standby or some other power saving mode ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Power settings wrong or battery dying?
On 11/04/18 17:48, Dave Stevens wrote: > On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 17:41:50 +0100 > Danny Horne via users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > if you pop the battery out for a day does the same thing happen? > > d > Just popped the battery, I'll report back in 24 hours ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Power settings wrong or battery dying?
Hi all, I have a four year old laptop that's running Fedora 27 Workstation. If I leave the thing switched off and unplugged after a day it will need recharging by varying degrees. Have I missed something in the power settings or is my battery on it's way out? Thanks for looking ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
