Re: module openmpi-x86_64
On 6/10/21 11:34 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > I am supposed to run > module load openmpi-x86_64 > ERROR: Unable to locate a modulefile for 'openmpi-x86_64' $ module load mpi/openmpi-x86_64 -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[SOLVED] Re: >60gb of reserved memory??
On 06/22/2018 02:50 PM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: I'd try a newer kernel from the 4.17 series from the non-official kernel repo for Fedora, just to narrow down the issue and see, whether it's really a kernel thing: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Kernel_Vanilla_Repositories This turned out to be a bad proposal, since the workstation didn't boot up anymore with the vanilla kernel. Fortunately, the local IT support went in and updated the BIOS which fixed the memory issue $ free totalusedfree shared buff/cache available Mem: 65845468 69088064087868 161676 1066720 64368104 Swap: 62499836 062499836 and they also booted the computer in a Fedora kernel. (I'm off-site for a couple of months.) I.e. the BIOS was the problem, as I had suspected. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SWLQDALBBOF4MLGKKDYRS4PBQHIZ3UI5/
Re: >60gb of reserved memory??
On 06/22/2018 12:00 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 06/21/2018 11:13 AM, Susi Lehtola wrote: Update: I upgraded from Fedora 27 to Fedora 28, and the same issue persists. Of course, the kernel is almost the same. This has to be some weird kernel / BIOS bug... Can you send us the content of /proc/cmdline? $ cat /proc/cmdline BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-4.16.16-300.fc28.x86_64 root=/dev/mapper/luks-1d176bad-1b27-4e38-8c18-61a8b96517db ro rd.luks.uuid=luks-1d176bad-1b27-4e38-8c18-61a8b96517db rd.luks.uuid=luks-aae08a03-2832-4b82-8d74-598e02c6c445 rhgb quiet LANG=en_US.UTF-8 Also check any RAMdisks you may have (e.g. "df -h | grep tmpfs"). See if any of them are possibly eating up RAM. I'd suspect /tmp and (possibly) your swap partition. $ df -h |grep tmpfs devtmpfs3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /dev tmpfs 3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /dev/shm tmpfs 3.9G 1.8M 3.9G 1% /run tmpfs 3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup tmpfs 3.9G 104K 3.9G 1% /tmp tmpfs 789M 16K 789M 1% /run/user/42 tmpfs 789M 24K 789M 1% /run/user/1000 so this still would leave something like 40GB missing. I opened up a bug on the kernel tracker at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1593878 -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZD537NEQPDKVLBMIQRY2WOSNHN7RYFM6/
Re: >60gb of reserved memory??
On 06/21/2018 07:51 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> AFAIK Fedora uses the available RAM as a) buffer space, and b) the /tmp
> filesystem.
>
> BTW a slightly more user-friendly way to get that info is with the
> free(1) command.
The joke is, the >60GB of missing memory doesn't even show up in free:
$ free
totalusedfree shared buff/cache
available
Mem:2400708 1093732 284844 121920 1022132 957848
Swap: 62499836 062499836
For some reason the kernel marks it as reserved.
On 06/21/2018 07:55 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> Try installing htop ("$ sudo dnf install htop"), run it, press F6 and
> select which memory item you want to sort by. That'll tell you what
> process is sucking up memory.
Same goes for htop. It's showing I have 2.29G of memory.
Update: I upgraded from Fedora 27 to Fedora 28, and the same issue
persists. Of course, the kernel is almost the same.
This has to be some weird kernel / BIOS bug...
--
Susi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TJRUC7YTAADRRDIGS3VH4CWLLOP3HZU6/
>60gb of reserved memory??
Dear all, I just noticed a very weird problem on my workstation. Although the machine has 64 GB of RAM installed, $ head -n 1 /proc/meminfo MemTotal:2400748 kB that is, only a few gigabytes are actually available. Unfortunately I don't have physical access to the machine, which is a HP desktop bought last fall. According to dmesg, the model is something like [0.00] DMI: HP HP EliteDesk 800 G3 TWR/8298, BIOS P01 Ver. 02.06 06/09/2017 Also according to dmesg, it appears that the kernel *does* see all 64 gigs, BUT OVER 60 GB IS RESERVED MEMORY!! [0.00] Memory: 2326720K/66985176K available (12300K kernel code, 1568K rwdata, 3836K rodata, 2124K init, 1368K bss, 64658456K reserved, 0K cma-reserved) Does anyone have any idea of what could be going on? I am running an up-to-date Fedora 27 x86_64 with kernel 4.16.15-200.fc27.x86_64.-- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FNBHYDDH2HMKQEKKFKN7NSRUFWW74IZS/
Re: gcc
On 04/22/2017 10:57 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, I would like that gcc generates an error (and not a warning), when there is a call to a non predeclared function. How can I do it? You might find that using the switches -Wall -Wextra are useful when you're trying to write code that is as clean as possible. To convert all warnings into errors you can use -Werror. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Weird crashes and slowdowns
Hi, I'm wondering if anyone else has noticed weird things happening on their Intel laptops. My Lenovo U31-70 has been misbehaving for a long long time under Fedora. Firefox and/or X often slow to a crawl, and sometimes X even crashes. I'm wondering if this is due to a buggy video driver. Some relevant info $ uname -r 4.9.14-200.fc25.x86_64 $ uptime 12:11:54 up 6 days, 22:55, 1 user, load average: 1.11, 0.98, 0.87 $ ps aux|grep Xorg 1241 root 20 0 10.160g 4.014g 159388 S 1.1 52.1 648:10.37 Xorg $ lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Broadwell-U Host Bridge -OPI (rev 09) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation HD Graphics 5500 (rev 09) 00:03.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation Broadwell-U Audio Controller (rev 09) 00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation Wildcat Point-LP USB xHCI Controller (rev 03) 00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation Wildcat Point-LP MEI Controller #1 (rev 03) 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation Wildcat Point-LP High Definition Audio Controller (rev 03) 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Wildcat Point-LP PCI Express Root Port #1 (rev e3) 00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Wildcat Point-LP PCI Express Root Port #3 (rev e3) 00:1c.3 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Wildcat Point-LP PCI Express Root Port #4 (rev e3) 00:1d.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation Wildcat Point-LP USB EHCI Controller (rev 03) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation Wildcat Point-LP LPC Controller (rev 03) 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation Wildcat Point-LP SATA Controller [AHCI Mode] (rev 03) 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation Wildcat Point-LP SMBus Controller (rev 03) 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 15) 03:00.0 Network controller: Qualcomm Atheros QCA6164 802.11ac Wireless Network Adapter (rev 20) -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Build .rpm for X64_64 only
On 01/15/2017 04:56 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: I wrote a spec file to build a .rpm for an application working only on 64 bits machines. The package builds fine and is in this form: myapp-version.fc25.x86_64.rpm Now, $ fedpkg --dist f25 lint complains: E: no-binary How can it be 64-bit only *and* no binary? If it only works on x86_64, then set ExclusiveArch: x86_64 noarch is be for architecture independent stuff, e.g. scripts and documentation. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: gsl-2
On 08/01/2016 12:34 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, Since I update fc22 to fc24 I am in trouble with several of my applications which require gsl. Actually, gsl has been updated from 1 to 2 with major changes. It results that perl-Math::GSL is not anymore compatible with gsl-2. The maintainer of this package is not ready to make the changes required by the new version of gsl and I have several crucial applications based on gsl and perl-Math::GSL. Is there any way to install gsl-1 with fc24 ? ... Going back to your original question, it would seem that adapting perl-Math::GSL to be compatible with GSL 2 would be the much easier route. GSL 2.x isn't that much different from GSL 1.x, only some functions have had their APIs changed. Also, it would seem that there's already work towards GSL 2.x support https://github.com/leto/math--gsl/issues/89 -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: gsl-1 and gsl-2
On 08/02/2016 01:24 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, Is it possible to install gsl-1 and gsl-2 with fc24 ? Thank for your help Not as (standard) rpms. But you can compile gsl-1 by hand if you really need it. Or, another alternative would be to install a distribution with the older software versions you need in a chroot or a virtual machine and use that. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: disk encryption
On 01/14/2016 06:40 PM, Jeffrey Ross wrote: I installed Fedora 23 on a Laptop a while back and I decided to use disk encryption. At this point I find the disk encryption to be more of a hindrance and would like to remove it. Am I correct that it may simply be easier to re-install the system rather than try to remove the encryption or is there an easy way to remove it? You're not saying if you encrypted the whole system or no. To remove the encryption, you'll need to reformat any encrypted partitions, which means moving your data somewhere else. Now, if you only encrypted the /home partition and had enough space on other partitions, you could move the data away, reformat the partition /home is situated, and move the data back. In general you'll have to reinstall. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!
On 09/17/2015 06:27 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 09/17/2015 06:21 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: Second, I wouldn't even attempt an update to F22 from here. I would upgrade to F21 first with the local repo disabled. Going the route of first installing f21 and then f22 is way too long (i.e. time consuming, during which the computer is not being used for more important things. But it is also the only one officially supported. You might be able to do a yum upgrade directly to Fedora 22 since no critical components have changed. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_20_-.3E_Fedora_21 PS. What does $ rpm -q fedora-release say? -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!
On 09/15/2015 04:14 PM, jd1008 wrote: The correct update from F21 to F22 is: fedup --network 22 fedup should have puked on "--product=nonproduct" as that's not a supported option since F21. Also check your repos.d files and make sure you haven't enabled rawhide. Hi Rick, None of rawhide repos are enabled. The latest version of fedup in f21 is fedpkg-1.20-1.fc21.noarch.rpm # rpm -q fedup fedup-0.9.2-1.fc21.noarch Now I'm confused. Quoting from your earlier message On 09/14/2015 01:04 PM, jd1008 wrote: > On a laptop with > 02:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM43224 802.11a/b/g/n > (rev 01) > and kernel: kernel-4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1 > > and compiled modules: > /lib/modules/4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc20.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net/phy/bcm7xxx.ko.xz > > /lib/modules/4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc20.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net/phy/bcm87xx.ko.xz you seem to be running Fedora 20, not Fedora 21. Have you updated part of your system to Fedora 21? If that is the case, I agree with Gordon. You should do a clean install of Fedora 22. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Kernel 4.3 does not seem to support Broadcom BCM43224 802.11a/b/g/n (rev 01)
On 09/14/2015 01:04 PM, jd1008 wrote: On a laptop with 02:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM43224 802.11a/b/g/n (rev 01) and kernel: kernel-4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1 and compiled modules: /lib/modules/4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc20.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net/phy/bcm7xxx.ko.xz /lib/modules/4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc20.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net/phy/bcm87xx.ko.xz /lib/modules/4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc20.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.ko.xz /lib/modules/4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc20.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac /lib/modules/4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc20.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/brcmfmac.ko.xz /lib/modules/4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc20.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmutil /lib/modules/4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc20.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmutil/brcmutil.ko.xz /lib/modules/4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc20.x86_64/kernel/drivers/bluetooth/bcm203x.ko.xz /lib/modules/4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc20.x86_64/kernel/drivers/bcma /lib/modules/4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc20.x86_64/kernel/drivers/bcma/bcma.ko.xz the wifi will not come on. Yes, I know the kernel I mention above is a release candidate, but I also tested released kernel 4.2.0 and it also does not support this wifi. What does dmesg say? Do you have the necessary firmware installed? -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: gsl
On 06/06/2015 04:29 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Thank, I know the fdfsolver works fine but not the fsolver which do not require the derivatives It's still not implemented in gsl. This question has nothing to do with Fedora. If you're not happy with the advice I gave you about using finite difference derivatives on the list and in private, you should really move this discussion to GSL's developers' list. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: gsl
On 06/04/2015 11:11 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Well, the same stands for multifit_fsolver: documentation exists in the manual. https://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/manual/html_node/Minimization-Algorithms-without-Derivatives.html#Minimization-Algorithms-without-Derivatives So it seems gsl doesn't have anything implemented currently. You can always use finite difference derivatives though... Probably not, because I am unable to calculate the analytical derivatives!!! If you can't do analytical gradients, you can do finite difference gradients. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: gsl
On 06/04/2015 07:50 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, This is not new. Somebody already asked but did not get the answer! http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24672293/how-do-i-set-the-fsolver-type-in-gsl gsl has an excellent manual. All of this is covered, with examples, at https://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/manual/html_node/Initializing-the-Solver.html#Initializing-the-Solver https://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/manual/html_node/Root-Bracketing-Algorithms.html#Root-Bracketing-Algorithms You also could have grepped through the sources to find GSL_VAR const gsl_root_fsolver_type * gsl_root_fsolver_bisection; GSL_VAR const gsl_root_fsolver_type * gsl_root_fsolver_brent; GSL_VAR const gsl_root_fsolver_type * gsl_root_fsolver_falsepos; GSL_VAR const gsl_root_fdfsolver_type * gsl_root_fdfsolver_newton; GSL_VAR const gsl_root_fdfsolver_type * gsl_root_fdfsolver_secant; GSL_VAR const gsl_root_fdfsolver_type * gsl_root_fdfsolver_steffenson; in gsl/gsl_roots.h. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: gsl
On 06/04/2015 09:28 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: This is not new. Somebody already asked but did not get the answer! http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24672293/how-do-i-set-the-fsolver-type-in-gsl gsl has an excellent manual. All of this is covered, with examples, at https://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/manual/html_node/Initializing-the-Solver.html#Initializing-the-Solver https://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/manual/html_node/Root-Bracketing-Algorithms.html#Root-Bracketing-Algorithms This is root_fsolver not the multifit_fsolver !!! Whoops. Well, the same stands for multifit_fsolver: documentation exists in the manual. https://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/manual/html_node/Minimization-Algorithms-without-Derivatives.html#Minimization-Algorithms-without-Derivatives So it seems gsl doesn't have anything implemented currently. You can always use finite difference derivatives though... -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Cannot find combination.hpp in Fedora boost
On 05/12/2015 12:08 AM, Paul Smith wrote: Dear All, I have installed Boost with yum install boost-devel However, I cannot find combination.hpp. Could you please help me? I don't think it's even part of Boost nowadays. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: FFTW with mpi support
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:16:15 -0400 Brahmanand Jogai jogai9...@comcast.net wrote: I am attempting to compile an application (MPB from MIT) with support for MPI. It needs fast fourier transform with MPI support. Fedora 20 provides several versions of fftw, but none has support for either openmpi or mpich2. Does anyone know of a repo that has fftw with mpi? I have not found anything on google. I tried compiling fftw from source, but it failed its own self tests. Besides, installing a home built fftw could affect other applications that depend on the Fedora-supplied one. Any suggestion will be appreciated. File a feature request in bugzilla against fftw. mpi support hasn't been put in, because compiling even fftw is a mess: four different flavors are built, consisting of single, double, long double and quadruple precision. Plugging in the mpi versions will require 3x4 = 12 separate compiles. Also, if the flavors are put in separate subpackages, it'll also mean 8 more subpackages... -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: honestly, what in the name of mutt is so slow about fedora rawhide?
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 17:16:42 -0400 (EDT) Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: following up on my recent posts about how painfully, excruciatingly, nad-grindingly, thigh-suckingly slow firefox is on fedora rawhide, well, nothing's changed. when i do something as simple as switch tabs, i can go fix myself a martini while waiting. so ... what can i do to debug this? i'm using a non-debug kernel, i have nothing else of any significance running, top doesn't show anything else hogging resources ... so now what? if i recall correctly, fedora 20 worked just fine, while i wouldn't wish fedora rawhide on someone holding me up at gunpoint. please ... thoughts? The flash plugin is infamous for doing this. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Critical bug in GnuTLS
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:29:23 + Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: On 03/05/14 18:21, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3413/gnutls-3.1.20-4.fc20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3363/gnutls-3.1.20-4.fc19 These need testing and karma. AFAIK 3.1.20 is not the bugfixed version. It needs to be 3.2.12, which is still only available for F21. poc So, you're saying the comments in those links are inaccurate? I'm just wondering why the version numbers don't correspond to those in the GnuTLS advisory: http://www.gnutls.org/security.html#GNUTLS-SA-2014-2 Most likely because the patch has been applied, as the maintainer didn't want to do a version bump on a core package. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Is this an RPMFusion problem? librtmp.so conflict
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:50:37 -0800 Rick Stevens ri...@alldigital.com wrote: OK, that's the same sort of issue. Still just a mixup of package versions on *your* system. Probably not a packaging fault. Going ahead with the distro-sync should take care of such things in the future. If packages from updates-testing fixed a problem for you, make sure to give them karma. It will help get the fixes into the main repos. It's not an upgrade problem, Pete. gstreamer wants librtmp.so.0, but the latest is librtmp.so.1. gstreamer needs to be updated/repackaged to use the later library or the librtmp package needs to symlink librtmp.so.1 to librtmpt.so.0 to satisfy gstreamer. My vote is to update gstreamer since it wants an old SONAME thing. This looks a lot like a problem with old yum metadata. Please run # yum clean all and then try # yum install mplayer All dependent packages have been recompiled against the bumped librtmp, and they've just hit the stable updates repo some time ago. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: oolatex
On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 20:24:19 +0200 Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote: Hello, I installed OOolatex on my fedora 19 i686 but the equation edition fails (from libreoffice): BASIC runtime error. Property or method not found: getDocumentInfo. I tried to contact: Geoffroy Piroux (gpir...@gmail.com) But I did not get any response. So I have been on the website: http://ooolatex.sourceforge.net/ where the rpm is supposed to come from, and tried to download the package, but there is not tar or any sort of package here (only fonts). Thus, is OOoLatex any more maintained? If no, what is going to replace it I just had a look at this. Seems like the ooolatex project is pretty much dead. However, there's another project called TexMaths that is based on ooolatex, which seems to be alive and kicking. There's no RPM for Fedora (I filed a RFE for it), but in the mean time it's very easy to install the plugin into LibreOffice. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Open MPI problem After F17 - F18 Upgrade
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:53:47 -0400 Kevin H. Hobbs hob...@ohio.edu wrote: After I updated my home computer from Fedora 17 to 18 MPI programs stopped working. (clip) I'm actually able to run the generated executable on another computer just fine. I tried using gdb to step through util/nidmap.c from 148 but whatever goes wrong is too far away for me to find it. Does anybody have any clue where I should look? Are you sure you have the correct MPI runtime loaded? All sorts of strange things can happen if you try running an MPI binary with the wrong runtime libraries, e.g. mpich2 binary with openmpi. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: dar is missing from EPEL 6
On Tue, 14 May 2013 10:47:08 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Tue, 14 May 2013 17:33:40 +0200 MegaBrutal megabru...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm a CentOS user. I see dar is not included in EPEL 6, while it is there in EPEL 5. I suppose it's left out of EPEL 6 by mistake. Please anyone who has the authority to do so, fix it! I also can't find dar in other repositories. If I download it from EPEL 5, I can't install it because of missing depedency (libcrypto.so.6). Compiling dar from source is Hell. So I really need an up-to-date dar package which is compatible with CentOS 6.4. Try asking on the epel-devel list? http://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel kevin Or email the maintainer at dar-ow...@fedoraproject.org, or file a bug against dar in bugzilla. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Eric4 segmentation fault
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:13:33 +0100 Martin Airs mar...@airs.me.uk wrote: Good day all, I wonder if anyone else uses eric on here, and if someone has a fix/workaround to get this running? [martin@desktop ~]$ eric4 Segmentation fault [martin@desktop ~]$ File a bug against eric. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Installing texlive under Fedora 17.
Quoting Rolf Turner r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz: Under Fedora 17 I recently had problems with running latex on a file that previously (under Ubuntu) I had no difficulty with. (A while back I had to switch from Ubuntu to Fedora for reasons that I won't go into here.) I thought that perhaps I might be able to get rid of the flakiness by re-installing texlive. I downloaded the install-tl-unx.tar.gz tarball from Don't install stuff manually when things have already been packages. Fedora 18 features a complete TeXLive 2012 distribution; you can also get it on Fedora 17 by # yum remove tex-* texlive-* # cat /etc/yum.repos.d/texlive.repo EOF [texlive] name=texlive baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2012/packages.f17/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 EOF # yum install texlive-scheme-full after which you will have a full blown TeXLive install. Alternatively, you can update to Fedora 18 and just do the last bit. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Problem with yum update yum upgrade
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:48:32 +1100 Roger are...@bigpond.com wrote: Hi I have been using sudo yum update yum upgrade every couple of days or so to keep Fedora 16 up to date but this morning have a problem. Note that yum is not apt. yum upgrade is the same as yum --obsoletes update. yum update is enough. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
