Re: Large number of dependencies
Yes, that's done it.
I prefer this approach because it brings the handling of third party jars
in line with the ones we've created ourselves, instead of being a special
case.
Thanks again!
Robert Egan
This email message and any attachments may contain confidential,
proprietary or non-public information. The information is intended solely
for the designated recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error
has misdirected this email, please notify the sender immediately and
destroy this email. Any review, dissemination, use or reliance upon this
information by unintended recipients is prohibited. Any opinions
expressed in this email are those of the author personally.
"Wayne Fay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/20/2007 11:22:11 AM:
> Brian, that works too. But most of the time, you've got several
> projects that all need the same collection of jars, so you end up
> installing this pom by itself and then you can add it to any project
> at any time.
>
> Wayne
>
> On 7/20/07, Lalor, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Wayne gave me more credit than I deserved, but we weren't quite
> talking about the same thing. Forget putting anything directly into
> the repository. Instead, assuming you're using a multi-module
> project, create a new sub-module and define your dependencies there.
> >
> > So, your tree would look something like this:
> > . top-level dir ("/"; groupId: com.foo, artifactId: top-level)
> > |- pom.xml
> > |- big-ass-dependency (groupId: com.foo, artifactId:
big-ass-dependency)
> > | `- pom.xml
> > |- web-proj
> > `- pom.xml
> >
> > In /big-ass-dependency/pom.xml, you'd specify your dependencies.
> In /web-proj/pom.xml, you'd declare your dependency on
big-ass-dependency:
> >
> >com.foo
> >big-ass-dependency
> >
> >
> > I'd like to model this in maven just for my own edification, but I
> don't have time right now. :-(
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 10:35 AM
> > > To: Maven Users List
> > > Subject: Re: Large number of dependencies
> > >
> > > It did not work, but pehaps I'm doing something wrong,
> > > because it still
> > > wants a jar. I added an appropriately named "empty jar"
> > > (manifest only)
> > > and even tried putting the pom in the jar.
> > >
> > > For now, I must put it on the back burner and deal with
> > > production issues
> > > (this counts as R&D).
> > >
> > > Thanks anyway for taking the time to answer.
> >
> > > "Wayne Fay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/20/2007 10:09:01 AM:
> > >
> > > > Yes, that works. Create a pom with no code, packaging pom, and
then
> > > > on that pom in your real code project. It should bring
all
> > > > the dependencies along with it.
> > > >
> > > > Wayne
> > > >
> > > > On 7/20/07, Lalor, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 9:20 AM
> > > > > > To: users@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > Subject: Large number of dependencies
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd like to bundle them into a sort of "dependency group"
> > > > > > that would then
> > > > > > take only one entry in my POMs. Suggestions?
> > > > >
> > > > > Dunno if this would work, but could you just create a .pom file
in
> > > > your repository without an associated JAR and declare the
> > > > dependencies in there? Then you'd declare each project's
dependency
> > > > on that single entity.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
-
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
-
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Re: Large number of dependencies
Brian, that works too. But most of the time, you've got several
projects that all need the same collection of jars, so you end up
installing this pom by itself and then you can add it to any project
at any time.
Wayne
On 7/20/07, Lalor, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wayne gave me more credit than I deserved, but we weren't quite talking about
the same thing. Forget putting anything directly into the repository.
Instead, assuming you're using a multi-module project, create a new sub-module
and define your dependencies there.
So, your tree would look something like this:
. top-level dir ("/"; groupId: com.foo, artifactId: top-level)
|- pom.xml
|- big-ass-dependency (groupId: com.foo, artifactId: big-ass-dependency)
| `- pom.xml
|- web-proj
`- pom.xml
In /big-ass-dependency/pom.xml, you'd specify your dependencies. In
/web-proj/pom.xml, you'd declare your dependency on big-ass-dependency:
com.foo
big-ass-dependency
I'd like to model this in maven just for my own edification, but I don't have
time right now. :-(
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 10:35 AM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: Large number of dependencies
>
> It did not work, but pehaps I'm doing something wrong,
> because it still
> wants a jar. I added an appropriately named "empty jar"
> (manifest only)
> and even tried putting the pom in the jar.
>
> For now, I must put it on the back burner and deal with
> production issues
> (this counts as R&D).
>
> Thanks anyway for taking the time to answer.
> "Wayne Fay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/20/2007 10:09:01 AM:
>
> > Yes, that works. Create a pom with no code, packaging pom, and then
> > on that pom in your real code project. It should bring all
> > the dependencies along with it.
> >
> > Wayne
> >
> > On 7/20/07, Lalor, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 9:20 AM
> > > > To: users@maven.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Large number of dependencies
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to bundle them into a sort of "dependency group"
> > > > that would then
> > > > take only one entry in my POMs. Suggestions?
> > >
> > > Dunno if this would work, but could you just create a .pom file in
> > your repository without an associated JAR and declare the
> > dependencies in there? Then you'd declare each project's dependency
> > on that single entity.
> > >
> > >
> -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Large number of dependencies
Wayne gave me more credit than I deserved, but we weren't quite talking about
the same thing. Forget putting anything directly into the repository.
Instead, assuming you're using a multi-module project, create a new sub-module
and define your dependencies there.
So, your tree would look something like this:
. top-level dir ("/"; groupId: com.foo, artifactId: top-level)
|- pom.xml
|- big-ass-dependency (groupId: com.foo, artifactId: big-ass-dependency)
| `- pom.xml
|- web-proj
`- pom.xml
In /big-ass-dependency/pom.xml, you'd specify your dependencies. In
/web-proj/pom.xml, you'd declare your dependency on big-ass-dependency:
com.foo
big-ass-dependency
I'd like to model this in maven just for my own edification, but I don't have
time right now. :-(
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 10:35 AM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: Large number of dependencies
>
> It did not work, but pehaps I'm doing something wrong,
> because it still
> wants a jar. I added an appropriately named "empty jar"
> (manifest only)
> and even tried putting the pom in the jar.
>
> For now, I must put it on the back burner and deal with
> production issues
> (this counts as R&D).
>
> Thanks anyway for taking the time to answer.
> "Wayne Fay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/20/2007 10:09:01 AM:
>
> > Yes, that works. Create a pom with no code, packaging pom, and then
> > on that pom in your real code project. It should bring all
> > the dependencies along with it.
> >
> > Wayne
> >
> > On 7/20/07, Lalor, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 9:20 AM
> > > > To: users@maven.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Large number of dependencies
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to bundle them into a sort of "dependency group"
> > > > that would then
> > > > take only one entry in my POMs. Suggestions?
> > >
> > > Dunno if this would work, but could you just create a .pom file in
> > your repository without an associated JAR and declare the
> > dependencies in there? Then you'd declare each project's dependency
> > on that single entity.
> > >
> > >
> -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Large number of dependencies
Hmmm I'm not quite sure what you are/were doing, but basically you need to create a pom, say ibm/pom.xml, and inside set the as "pom", add the for your various ibm jars in there, then add this "ibm" artifactId to your other project(s). This of course requires that you: 1. install the ibm/pom.xml file into your repo and 2. have all the ibm jars installed/available in your repo as well. Wayne On 7/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It did not work, but pehaps I'm doing something wrong, because it still wants a jar. I added an appropriately named "empty jar" (manifest only) and even tried putting the pom in the jar. For now, I must put it on the back burner and deal with production issues (this counts as R&D). Thanks anyway for taking the time to answer. Robert Egan This email message and any attachments may contain confidential, proprietary or non-public information. The information is intended solely for the designated recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this email, please notify the sender immediately and destroy this email. Any review, dissemination, use or reliance upon this information by unintended recipients is prohibited. Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the author personally. "Wayne Fay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/20/2007 10:09:01 AM: > Yes, that works. Create a pom with no code, packaging pom, and then > on that pom in your real code project. It should bring all > the dependencies along with it. > > Wayne > > On 7/20/07, Lalor, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 9:20 AM > > > To: users@maven.apache.org > > > Subject: Large number of dependencies > > > > > > I'd like to bundle them into a sort of "dependency group" > > > that would then > > > take only one entry in my POMs. Suggestions? > > > > Dunno if this would work, but could you just create a .pom file in > your repository without an associated JAR and declare the > dependencies in there? Then you'd declare each project's dependency > on that single entity. > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Large number of dependencies
It did not work, but pehaps I'm doing something wrong, because it still wants a jar. I added an appropriately named "empty jar" (manifest only) and even tried putting the pom in the jar. For now, I must put it on the back burner and deal with production issues (this counts as R&D). Thanks anyway for taking the time to answer. Robert Egan This email message and any attachments may contain confidential, proprietary or non-public information. The information is intended solely for the designated recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this email, please notify the sender immediately and destroy this email. Any review, dissemination, use or reliance upon this information by unintended recipients is prohibited. Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the author personally. "Wayne Fay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/20/2007 10:09:01 AM: > Yes, that works. Create a pom with no code, packaging pom, and then > on that pom in your real code project. It should bring all > the dependencies along with it. > > Wayne > > On 7/20/07, Lalor, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 9:20 AM > > > To: users@maven.apache.org > > > Subject: Large number of dependencies > > > > > > I'd like to bundle them into a sort of "dependency group" > > > that would then > > > take only one entry in my POMs. Suggestions? > > > > Dunno if this would work, but could you just create a .pom file in > your repository without an associated JAR and declare the > dependencies in there? Then you'd declare each project's dependency > on that single entity. > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Re: Large number of dependencies
Yes, that works. Create a pom with no code, packaging pom, and then on that pom in your real code project. It should bring all the dependencies along with it. Wayne On 7/20/07, Lalor, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 9:20 AM > To: users@maven.apache.org > Subject: Large number of dependencies > > I'd like to bundle them into a sort of "dependency group" > that would then > take only one entry in my POMs. Suggestions? Dunno if this would work, but could you just create a .pom file in your repository without an associated JAR and declare the dependencies in there? Then you'd declare each project's dependency on that single entity. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Large number of dependencies
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 9:20 AM > To: users@maven.apache.org > Subject: Large number of dependencies > > I'd like to bundle them into a sort of "dependency group" > that would then > take only one entry in my POMs. Suggestions? Dunno if this would work, but could you just create a .pom file in your repository without an associated JAR and declare the dependencies in there? Then you'd declare each project's dependency on that single entity. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Large number of dependencies
I've just begun implementing maven into our build process. I have some artifacts with a large number of dependencies. ibm\websphere\j2ee\6.0.2\j2ee-6.0.2.jar ibm\websphere\runtime\6.0.2\runtime-6.0.2.jar ibm\websphere\rsadaptercci\6.0.2\rsadaptercci-6.0.2.jar ibm\websphere\rsadapterspi\6.0.2\rsadapterspi-6.0.2.jar ibm\websphere\rsaexternal\6.0.2\rsaexternal-6.0.2.jar ibm\websphere\sas\6.0.2\sas-6.0.2.jar ibm\websphere\ras\6.0.2\ras-6.0.2.jar ibm\websphere\bootstrap\6.0.2\bootstrap-6.0.2.jar ibm\websphere\emf\6.0.2\emf-6.0.2.jar ibm\websphere\iwsorb6.0.2\iwsorb-6.0.2.jar ibm\websphere\utils6.0.2\utils-6.0.2.jar ibm\websphere\wssec\6.0.2\wssec-6.0.2.jar ibm\websphere\admin\6.0.2\admin-6.0.2.jar ibm\websphere\management\6.0.2\management-6.0.2.jar ibm\websphere\wasjmx\6.0.2\wasjmx-6.0.2.jar ibm\websphere\wsexception\6.0.2\wsexception-6.0.2.jar ibm\websphere\jsf-api\6.0.2\jsf-api-6.0.2.jar ibm\websphere\ws-jsf\6.0.2\ws-jsf-6.0.2.jar ibm\websphere\webservices\6.0.2\webservices-6.0.2.jar I'd like to bundle them into a sort of "dependency group" that would then take only one entry in my POMs. Suggestions? This email message and any attachments may contain confidential, proprietary or non-public information. The information is intended solely for the designated recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this email, please notify the sender immediately and destroy this email. Any review, dissemination, use or reliance upon this information by unintended recipients is prohibited. Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the author personally.
