mvn classworlds:uberjar
There was a conversion on this list in August that suggested jarjar, minijar shade style of working. Selenium needs to bundle Jetty in its server jar. Jetty is notoriously hard to 'shade' given there are a gazillion fine grained issues around reflection and other dependancies like the servlet api (should that be shaded too ?). The Uberjar way would preserve original class names, but hide them all from other things in the classpath. Selenium server is booted from the command line via a main() method obviously - thus it is an ideal case for Uberjar Did anyone quantify how much and in what way things were slower with Uberjar ? Regards, - Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mvn classworlds:uberjar
Hi Paul, Paul Hammant wrote: There was a conversion on this list in August that suggested jarjar, minijar shade style of working. Selenium needs to bundle Jetty in its server jar. Jetty is notoriously hard to 'shade' given there are a gazillion fine grained issues around reflection and other dependancies like the servlet api (should that be shaded too ?). The Uberjar way would preserve original class names, but hide them all from other things in the classpath. Selenium server is booted from the command line via a main() method obviously - thus it is an ideal case for Uberjar Did anyone quantify how much and in what way things were slower with Uberjar ? I had once a client connecting to a WLS and added the weblogic.jar to its deps. I used the uberjar to have one fine single jar to start anything. Well, after 45min the application actually was ready after startup. Without the uberjar it took less then 30sec. Questions? ;-) - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mvn classworlds:uberjar
There's one-jar now as a replacement for uber-jar. It looks much faster - I'm running with that. Cheers, - Paul On Dec 10, 2008, at 1:49 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Paul, Paul Hammant wrote: There was a conversion on this list in August that suggested jarjar, minijar shade style of working. Selenium needs to bundle Jetty in its server jar. Jetty is notoriously hard to 'shade' given there are a gazillion fine grained issues around reflection and other dependancies like the servlet api (should that be shaded too ?). The Uberjar way would preserve original class names, but hide them all from other things in the classpath. Selenium server is booted from the command line via a main() method obviously - thus it is an ideal case for Uberjar Did anyone quantify how much and in what way things were slower with Uberjar ? I had once a client connecting to a WLS and added the weblogic.jar to its deps. I used the uberjar to have one fine single jar to start anything. Well, after 45min the application actually was ready after startup. Without the uberjar it took less then 30sec. Questions? ;-) - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mvn classworlds:uberjar
Paul Hammant wrote at Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2008 00:29: There's one-jar now as a replacement for uber-jar. It looks much faster - I'm running with that. In M1 we used javaapp instead - I suppose this did the same. - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
