[Users] IPv6 Non-Functional - 3.10.0-1160.80.1.vz7.191.4

2023-07-03 Thread George

Hello,

Ever since updating to 3.10.0-1160.80.1.vz7.191.4, I've found that IPv6 no 
longer works, on both the host node and VPS' on it:

[root@test ~]# ping6 google.com
PING google.com(ams17s10-in-x0e.1e100.net (2a00:1450:400e:801::200e)) 56 data 
bytes
^C
--- google.com ping statistics ---
83 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 82000ms

[root@test ~]#

The only "fix" I know of is to restart networking on the host node - which 
isn't ideal as it knocks out networking on VPS', and only provides temporary relief 
anyway.

I'm aware from industry forums that this problem is not unique to me.

I've tried AlmaLinux, Debian, Ubuntu, etc - it happens with all Linux 
distributions - clean install or not.

Just curious - outside out restarting networking, or downgrading the kernel, 
does anyone know of a fix for this issue?

___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6, openVZ7, CentOS7

2022-12-15 Thread Oleksiy Tkachenko
Yes, br0 contains main server`s IPv4.
So I perform tuning and now my IPv6 address pingable - but from this node
only (and not on CTs on this node).
This node CTs or other internet places - they do not see my IPv6.
Other 2 secondary IPv6 addresses not even pingable from node.

My steps:
# nano -w /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0
IPV6INIT=yes
IPV6_AUTOCONF=no
IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes
IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no
IPV6ADDR=myIPv6IP_1
IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES=myIPv6IP_2 myIPv6IP_3
IPV6_DEFAULTGW=myIPv6GW

# nano -w /etc/sysconfig/network
NETWORKING_IPV6=yes
IPV6FORWARDING=yes
IPV6_DEFAULTDEV=br0
IPV6_DEFAULTGW=myIPv6GW
IPV6_AUTOCONF=no

# echo "net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding = 1" >> /etc/sysctl.conf
# echo "net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding = 1" >> /etc/sysctl.conf
# echo "net.ipv6.conf.all.proxy_ndp = 1" >> /etc/sysctl.conf
# sysctl -p

# nano -w /etc/sysconfig/iptables-config
IP6TABLES_MODULES="ip6_tables ip6table_filter ip6table_mangle ip6t_REJECT
nf_conntrack_ipv6"

# reboot -n

чт, 15 груд. 2022 р. о 14:34 Arjit Chaudhary  пише:

> Hi,
> It could be in br0 if you are bridging enp3s0f0 and/or enp3s0f1
>
> Basically the interface which lists as UP and with the IPv4 information
> etc should be the right one in my experience.
>
> But do back-up original configuration files on the system, before editing
> just incase something goes wrong you can just copy them back and restart
> networking.
>
>
> On Thu, 15 Dec, 2022, 17:40 Oleksiy Tkachenko,  wrote:
>
>> I have many)
>> # ip a
>> 1: lo:
>> 2: enp3s0f0:
>> 3: enp3s0f1:
>> 4: enp0s20f0u9u2c2:
>> 5: br0:
>> 6: virbr0:
>> 7: virbr0-nic:
>> 8: venet0:
>> 9: host-routed:
>> 11: veth72240bcc@if3:
>> 12: veth720bed05@if3:
>> 13: veth7290a381@if3:
>> 16: veth721813e6@if3:
>> 17: veth720a338a@if3:
>> 24: veth729a3460@if3:
>> 25: veth720c6518@if3:
>> 26: veth721bbb55@if3:
>> 27: veth72705632@if3:
>> 28: veth72b28dcd@if3:
>>
>>
>> чт, 15 груд. 2022 р. о 13:52 Arjit Chaudhary  пише:
>>
>>> Is your interface name different by chance?
>>>
>>> Can you check,
>>>
>>> > ip a
>>>
>>> for the actual interface name and then update that interface
>>> configuration for the IPv6.
>>>
>>> On Thu, 15 Dec, 2022, 16:43 Oleksiy Tkachenko, 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Thank you!
 During node preparation I need to update
 "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX" - but there is no such file.
 I also need to put "eth0" in "/etc/sysconfig/network" file - is it
 actual now (when I have no ethX file)?

 I also need to "Add 'ipt_state' to IPTABLES and 'nf_conntrack_ipv6' to
 IP6TABLES" in "/etc/vz.conf" - there is no such file also.
 I have "/etc/vz/vz.conf" on my bare metal openvz7 but there is no
 "IPTABLES" or "IP6TABLES" mention at all.


 чт, 15 груд. 2022 р. о 02:03 Arjit Chaudhary  пише:

> (In my experience)
>
> Does the host-node have working IPv6 configured on it? If yes,
>
> Then you can just do,
>
> vzctl set  --ipadd  -- save
>
> and the container too will have working IPv6.
>
> If the host-node does not have working IPv6, then you can just
> configure any address of the IPv6 range on the host-node
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:15 AM UNLIM.SRV  wrote:
>
>> Trying to setup IPv6 for CentOS7 CT.
>> Seems original documentation outdated a bit (
>> https://wiki.openvz.org/IPv6).
>> Is there updated information?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>>
>> --
>> Oleksiy
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@openvz.org
>> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Arjit Chaudhary
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@openvz.org
> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@openvz.org
 https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users

>>> ___
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users@openvz.org
>>> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@openvz.org
>> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@openvz.org
> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6, openVZ7, CentOS7

2022-12-15 Thread Arjit Chaudhary
Hi,
It could be in br0 if you are bridging enp3s0f0 and/or enp3s0f1

Basically the interface which lists as UP and with the IPv4 information etc
should be the right one in my experience.

But do back-up original configuration files on the system, before editing
just incase something goes wrong you can just copy them back and restart
networking.


On Thu, 15 Dec, 2022, 17:40 Oleksiy Tkachenko,  wrote:

> I have many)
> # ip a
> 1: lo:
> 2: enp3s0f0:
> 3: enp3s0f1:
> 4: enp0s20f0u9u2c2:
> 5: br0:
> 6: virbr0:
> 7: virbr0-nic:
> 8: venet0:
> 9: host-routed:
> 11: veth72240bcc@if3:
> 12: veth720bed05@if3:
> 13: veth7290a381@if3:
> 16: veth721813e6@if3:
> 17: veth720a338a@if3:
> 24: veth729a3460@if3:
> 25: veth720c6518@if3:
> 26: veth721bbb55@if3:
> 27: veth72705632@if3:
> 28: veth72b28dcd@if3:
>
>
> чт, 15 груд. 2022 р. о 13:52 Arjit Chaudhary  пише:
>
>> Is your interface name different by chance?
>>
>> Can you check,
>>
>> > ip a
>>
>> for the actual interface name and then update that interface
>> configuration for the IPv6.
>>
>> On Thu, 15 Dec, 2022, 16:43 Oleksiy Tkachenko, 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you!
>>> During node preparation I need to update
>>> "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX" - but there is no such file.
>>> I also need to put "eth0" in "/etc/sysconfig/network" file - is it
>>> actual now (when I have no ethX file)?
>>>
>>> I also need to "Add 'ipt_state' to IPTABLES and 'nf_conntrack_ipv6' to
>>> IP6TABLES" in "/etc/vz.conf" - there is no such file also.
>>> I have "/etc/vz/vz.conf" on my bare metal openvz7 but there is no
>>> "IPTABLES" or "IP6TABLES" mention at all.
>>>
>>>
>>> чт, 15 груд. 2022 р. о 02:03 Arjit Chaudhary  пише:
>>>
 (In my experience)

 Does the host-node have working IPv6 configured on it? If yes,

 Then you can just do,

 vzctl set  --ipadd  -- save

 and the container too will have working IPv6.

 If the host-node does not have working IPv6, then you can just
 configure any address of the IPv6 range on the host-node


 On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:15 AM UNLIM.SRV  wrote:

> Trying to setup IPv6 for CentOS7 CT.
> Seems original documentation outdated a bit (
> https://wiki.openvz.org/IPv6).
> Is there updated information?
>
> Thank you!
>
>
> --
> Oleksiy
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@openvz.org
> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>


 --
 Thanks,
 Arjit Chaudhary
 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@openvz.org
 https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users

>>> ___
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users@openvz.org
>>> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@openvz.org
>> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@openvz.org
> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6, openVZ7, CentOS7

2022-12-15 Thread Oleksiy Tkachenko
I have many)
# ip a
1: lo:
2: enp3s0f0:
3: enp3s0f1:
4: enp0s20f0u9u2c2:
5: br0:
6: virbr0:
7: virbr0-nic:
8: venet0:
9: host-routed:
11: veth72240bcc@if3:
12: veth720bed05@if3:
13: veth7290a381@if3:
16: veth721813e6@if3:
17: veth720a338a@if3:
24: veth729a3460@if3:
25: veth720c6518@if3:
26: veth721bbb55@if3:
27: veth72705632@if3:
28: veth72b28dcd@if3:


чт, 15 груд. 2022 р. о 13:52 Arjit Chaudhary  пише:

> Is your interface name different by chance?
>
> Can you check,
>
> > ip a
>
> for the actual interface name and then update that interface configuration
> for the IPv6.
>
> On Thu, 15 Dec, 2022, 16:43 Oleksiy Tkachenko,  wrote:
>
>> Thank you!
>> During node preparation I need to update
>> "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX" - but there is no such file.
>> I also need to put "eth0" in "/etc/sysconfig/network" file - is it actual
>> now (when I have no ethX file)?
>>
>> I also need to "Add 'ipt_state' to IPTABLES and 'nf_conntrack_ipv6' to
>> IP6TABLES" in "/etc/vz.conf" - there is no such file also.
>> I have "/etc/vz/vz.conf" on my bare metal openvz7 but there is no
>> "IPTABLES" or "IP6TABLES" mention at all.
>>
>>
>> чт, 15 груд. 2022 р. о 02:03 Arjit Chaudhary  пише:
>>
>>> (In my experience)
>>>
>>> Does the host-node have working IPv6 configured on it? If yes,
>>>
>>> Then you can just do,
>>>
>>> vzctl set  --ipadd  -- save
>>>
>>> and the container too will have working IPv6.
>>>
>>> If the host-node does not have working IPv6, then you can just configure
>>> any address of the IPv6 range on the host-node
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:15 AM UNLIM.SRV  wrote:
>>>
 Trying to setup IPv6 for CentOS7 CT.
 Seems original documentation outdated a bit (
 https://wiki.openvz.org/IPv6).
 Is there updated information?

 Thank you!


 --
 Oleksiy
 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@openvz.org
 https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users

>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>> Arjit Chaudhary
>>> ___
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users@openvz.org
>>> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@openvz.org
>> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@openvz.org
> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6, openVZ7, CentOS7

2022-12-15 Thread Arjit Chaudhary
Is your interface name different by chance?

Can you check,

> ip a

for the actual interface name and then update that interface configuration
for the IPv6.

On Thu, 15 Dec, 2022, 16:43 Oleksiy Tkachenko,  wrote:

> Thank you!
> During node preparation I need to update
> "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX" - but there is no such file.
> I also need to put "eth0" in "/etc/sysconfig/network" file - is it actual
> now (when I have no ethX file)?
>
> I also need to "Add 'ipt_state' to IPTABLES and 'nf_conntrack_ipv6' to
> IP6TABLES" in "/etc/vz.conf" - there is no such file also.
> I have "/etc/vz/vz.conf" on my bare metal openvz7 but there is no
> "IPTABLES" or "IP6TABLES" mention at all.
>
>
> чт, 15 груд. 2022 р. о 02:03 Arjit Chaudhary  пише:
>
>> (In my experience)
>>
>> Does the host-node have working IPv6 configured on it? If yes,
>>
>> Then you can just do,
>>
>> vzctl set  --ipadd  -- save
>>
>> and the container too will have working IPv6.
>>
>> If the host-node does not have working IPv6, then you can just configure
>> any address of the IPv6 range on the host-node
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:15 AM UNLIM.SRV  wrote:
>>
>>> Trying to setup IPv6 for CentOS7 CT.
>>> Seems original documentation outdated a bit (
>>> https://wiki.openvz.org/IPv6).
>>> Is there updated information?
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Oleksiy
>>> ___
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users@openvz.org
>>> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Arjit Chaudhary
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@openvz.org
>> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@openvz.org
> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6, openVZ7, CentOS7

2022-12-15 Thread Oleksiy Tkachenko
Thank you!
During node preparation I need to update
"/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX" - but there is no such file.
I also need to put "eth0" in "/etc/sysconfig/network" file - is it actual
now (when I have no ethX file)?

I also need to "Add 'ipt_state' to IPTABLES and 'nf_conntrack_ipv6' to
IP6TABLES" in "/etc/vz.conf" - there is no such file also.
I have "/etc/vz/vz.conf" on my bare metal openvz7 but there is no
"IPTABLES" or "IP6TABLES" mention at all.


чт, 15 груд. 2022 р. о 02:03 Arjit Chaudhary  пише:

> (In my experience)
>
> Does the host-node have working IPv6 configured on it? If yes,
>
> Then you can just do,
>
> vzctl set  --ipadd  -- save
>
> and the container too will have working IPv6.
>
> If the host-node does not have working IPv6, then you can just configure
> any address of the IPv6 range on the host-node
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:15 AM UNLIM.SRV  wrote:
>
>> Trying to setup IPv6 for CentOS7 CT.
>> Seems original documentation outdated a bit (https://wiki.openvz.org/IPv6
>> ).
>> Is there updated information?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>>
>> --
>> Oleksiy
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@openvz.org
>> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Arjit Chaudhary
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@openvz.org
> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6, openVZ7, CentOS7

2022-12-14 Thread Arjit Chaudhary
(In my experience)

Does the host-node have working IPv6 configured on it? If yes,

Then you can just do,

vzctl set  --ipadd  -- save

and the container too will have working IPv6.

If the host-node does not have working IPv6, then you can just configure
any address of the IPv6 range on the host-node


On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:15 AM UNLIM.SRV  wrote:

> Trying to setup IPv6 for CentOS7 CT.
> Seems original documentation outdated a bit (https://wiki.openvz.org/IPv6
> ).
> Is there updated information?
>
> Thank you!
>
>
> --
> Oleksiy
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@openvz.org
> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>


-- 
Thanks,
Arjit Chaudhary
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] IPv6, openVZ7, CentOS7

2022-12-14 Thread UNLIM.SRV

Trying to setup IPv6 for CentOS7 CT.
Seems original documentation outdated a bit (https://wiki.openvz.org/IPv6).
Is there updated information?

Thank you!


--
Oleksiy
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] ipv6 problem

2021-06-11 Thread Vasily Averin
On 6/11/21 12:02 PM, mailingl...@tikklik.nl wrote:
> Any idees what can be wrong.
> 
> I can add a ipv6 ip to any container, but one
> 
> vzctl set 201 --ipadd 2a00:1bd0:740:xxx --save
> 
> Adding IP address(es): 2a00:1bd0:740:
> 
> SIOCSIFADDR: Permission denied

which kernel version is used on your node?
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] ipv6 problem

2021-06-11 Thread mailinglist
Never mind, found it
Was a older vps container that had ipv6 disabled 


-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: users-boun...@openvz.org  Namens Vasily Averin
Verzonden: vrijdag 11 juni 2021 11:28
Aan: users@openvz.org
Onderwerp: Re: [Users] ipv6 problem

On 6/11/21 12:02 PM, mailingl...@tikklik.nl wrote:
> Any idees what can be wrong.
> 
> I can add a ipv6 ip to any container, but one
> 
> vzctl set 201 --ipadd 2a00:1bd0:740:xxx --save
> 
> Adding IP address(es): 2a00:1bd0:740:
> 
> SIOCSIFADDR: Permission denied

which kernel version is used on your node?
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] ipv6 problem

2021-06-11 Thread mailinglist
Any idees what can be wrong.

 

I can add a ipv6 ip to any container, but one

 

vzctl set 201 --ipadd 2a00:1bd0:740:xxx --save

 

Adding IP address(es): 2a00:1bd0:740:

SIOCSIFADDR: Permission denied

 

Thanks
Steffan

 

 

 

___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] ipv6 connectivity to http://ftp.openvz.org

2015-11-24 Thread Sergey Bronnikov
Hi,

On 08:14 Sun 22 Nov , J.E. wrote:
> 
> Then I tried pulling a random template.  Was over 20 MB/s at one point then
> averaged out between 4 MB & 6 MB/s. I've seen it steady at 2 MB/s before
> (both v4 and v6) just for vztmpl-dl.  Getting there!

JFYI: there are two primary download site:
in USA (Seattle): download.openvz.org
in Europe (Switzerland): eu.download.openvz.org

and also we have hundred OpenVZ mirrors maintained by volunteers:
https://mirrors.openvz.org/ Pick the nearest one to get max download speed.

Sergey
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] ipv6 connectivity to http://ftp.openvz.org

2015-11-22 Thread J.E.




root@hyperion:~# wget -O - http://ftp.openvz.org/debian/archive.key && rm -rf 
archive.key
--2015-11-22 02:43:10--  http://ftp.openvz.org/debian/archive.key
Resolving ftp.openvz.org (ftp.openvz.org)... 2620:e6::104:11, 
199.115.104.11

Connecting to ftp.openvz.org (ftp.openvz.org)|2620:e6::104:11|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 1694 (1.7K) [text/plain]
Saving to: 'STDOUT'



100%[==>]

2015-11-22 02:43:10 (510 MB/s) - written to stdout [1694/1694]


Then I tried pulling a random template.  Was over 20 MB/s at one point 
then averaged out between 4 MB & 6 MB/s. I've seen it steady at 2 MB/s 
before (both v4 and v6) just for vztmpl-dl.  Getting there!



root@hyperion:~# wget -N 
http://download.openvz.org/template/precreated/centos-6-x86_64-devel.tar.gz 
&& rm -rf centos-6*
--2015-11-22 03:06:09-- 
http://download.openvz.org/template/precreated/centos-6-x86_64-devel.tar.gz
Resolving download.openvz.org (download.openvz.org)... 2620:e6::104:11, 
199.115.104.11
Connecting to download.openvz.org 
(download.openvz.org)|2620:e6::104:11|:80... connected.

HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 264526360 (252M) [application/x-gzip]
Saving to: 'centos-6-x86_64-devel.tar.gz'

100%[==>]

2015-11-22 03:06:57 (5.26 MB/s) - 'centos-6-x86_64-devel.tar.gz'

--


traceroute to download.openvz.org (2620:e6::104:11) from 
2607:ff68:106:f:a:d:e:d, 30 hops max, 24 byte packets

 1  2607:ff68:106::3 (2607:ff68:106::3)  0.179 ms  0.071 ms  0.059 ms
 2  te3-3.core1.bdr1.dllstx3.dallas-idc.com (2607:ff68:1:a::1)  1.767 ms  1.754 
ms  1.46 ms
 3  2607:ff68:1:6::11 (2607:ff68:1:6::11)  3.589 ms  2.339 ms  1.842 ms
 4  2607:ff68:1:6::72 (2607:ff68:1:6::72)  1.128 ms  2.012 ms  0.837 ms
 5  2001:550:2:7d::1 (2001:550:2:7d::1)  1.106 ms  1.168 ms  1.044 ms
 6  te0-0-0-26.ccr22.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com (2001:550:0:1000::9a36:2e2d)  
1.13 ms  1.229 ms  1.106 ms
 7  be2433.ccr22.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com (2001:550:0:1000::9a36:3d6)  11.295 
ms  12.329 ms  11.289 ms
 8  be2130.ccr22.den01.atlas.cogentco.com (2001:550:0:1000::9a36:1a79)  23.974 
ms  23.549 ms  23.057 ms
 9  be2127.ccr21.slc01.atlas.cogentco.com (2001:550:0:1000::9a36:1946)  33.743 
ms  34.359 ms  33.44 ms
10  be2085.ccr21.sea02.atlas.cogentco.com (2001:550:0:1000::9a36:2c5)  54.83 ms 
 54.405 ms  54.56 ms
11  be2481.rcr11.sea05.atlas.cogentco.com (2001:550:0:1000::9a36:1982)  56.466 
ms  55.926 ms  55.816 ms
12  te0-0-2-3.rcr11.sea03.atlas.cogentco.com (2001:550:0:1000::9a36:1b9)  
55.561 ms  55.433 ms  55.385 ms
13  te0-0-2-2.agr12.sea03.atlas.cogentco.com (2001:550:0:1000::9a18:efe)  
55.497 ms  55.894 ms  56.146 ms
14  te0-0-2-3.nr12.b022847-3.sea03.atlas.cogentco.com 
(2001:550:0:1000::9a18:1322)  56.457 ms  56.285 ms  56.248 ms
15  2001:550:2:30::2:3 (2001:550:2:30::2:3)  55.71 ms  55.857 ms  55.678 ms
16  2620:e6::105:224 (2620:e6::105:224)  56.011 ms  55.2 ms  55.056 ms
17  download.openvz.org (2620:e6::104:11)  55.224 ms  55.034 ms  55.248 ms


John Edel




On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:


It seems it's working now. If it's not working for you, please provide
a traceroute6 output.

Kir

On 11/13/2015 07:03 AM, CoolCold wrote:

Hello!
Looks like ftp.openvz.org resolvs via ipv6 too, but not working well:

root@mu2 /home/coolcold # wget -O -
'http://ftp.openvz.org/debian/archive.key'|apt-key add -
--2015-11-13 17:59:40--  http://ftp.openvz.org/debian/archive.key
Resolving ftp.openvz.org (ftp.openvz.org)... 2620:e6::104:11, 
199.115.104.11

Connecting to ftp.openvz.org (ftp.openvz.org)|2620:e6::104:11|:80...
failed: Connection timed out.
Connecting to ftp.openvz.org (ftp.openvz.org)|199.115.104.11|:80... 
connected.



checking with telnet:
root@mu2 /home/coolcold # telnet -6 ftp.openvz.org 80
Trying 2620:e6::104:11...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection timed out


and yandex is ok:
coolcold@mu2:~/gits/flashcache$ telnet -6 www.ya.ru 80
Trying 2a02:6b8::3...
Connected to ya.ru.
Escape character is '^]'.
^]
telnet> quit
Connection closed.


should you disable ipv6 resolve?



___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] ipv6 connectivity to http://ftp.openvz.org

2015-11-18 Thread Kir Kolyshkin

It seems it's working now. If it's not working for you, please provide
a traceroute6 output.

Kir

On 11/13/2015 07:03 AM, CoolCold wrote:

Hello!
Looks like ftp.openvz.org resolvs via ipv6 too, but not working well:

root@mu2 /home/coolcold # wget -O -
'http://ftp.openvz.org/debian/archive.key'|apt-key add -
--2015-11-13 17:59:40--  http://ftp.openvz.org/debian/archive.key
Resolving ftp.openvz.org (ftp.openvz.org)... 2620:e6::104:11, 199.115.104.11
Connecting to ftp.openvz.org (ftp.openvz.org)|2620:e6::104:11|:80...
failed: Connection timed out.
Connecting to ftp.openvz.org (ftp.openvz.org)|199.115.104.11|:80... connected.


checking with telnet:
root@mu2 /home/coolcold # telnet -6 ftp.openvz.org 80
Trying 2620:e6::104:11...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection timed out


and yandex is ok:
coolcold@mu2:~/gits/flashcache$ telnet -6 www.ya.ru 80
Trying 2a02:6b8::3...
Connected to ya.ru.
Escape character is '^]'.
^]
telnet> quit
Connection closed.


should you disable ipv6 resolve?



___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] ipv6 connectivity to http://ftp.openvz.org

2015-11-13 Thread CoolCold
Hello!
Looks like ftp.openvz.org resolvs via ipv6 too, but not working well:

root@mu2 /home/coolcold # wget -O -
'http://ftp.openvz.org/debian/archive.key'|apt-key add -
--2015-11-13 17:59:40--  http://ftp.openvz.org/debian/archive.key
Resolving ftp.openvz.org (ftp.openvz.org)... 2620:e6::104:11, 199.115.104.11
Connecting to ftp.openvz.org (ftp.openvz.org)|2620:e6::104:11|:80...
failed: Connection timed out.
Connecting to ftp.openvz.org (ftp.openvz.org)|199.115.104.11|:80... connected.


checking with telnet:
root@mu2 /home/coolcold # telnet -6 ftp.openvz.org 80
Trying 2620:e6::104:11...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection timed out


and yandex is ok:
coolcold@mu2:~/gits/flashcache$ telnet -6 www.ya.ru 80
Trying 2a02:6b8::3...
Connected to ya.ru.
Escape character is '^]'.
^]
telnet> quit
Connection closed.


should you disable ipv6 resolve?

-- 
Best regards,
[COOLCOLD-RIPN]
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] ipv6 connectivity to http://ftp.openvz.org

2015-11-13 Thread Kir Kolyshkin

On 11/13/2015 07:03 AM, CoolCold wrote:

Hello!
Looks like ftp.openvz.org resolvs via ipv6 too, but not working well:


Hi,

We are aware of the problem and let the admins know, still waiting for 
them to reply.


Anyway, thanks for reporting

Kir.



root@mu2 /home/coolcold # wget -O -
'http://ftp.openvz.org/debian/archive.key'|apt-key add -
--2015-11-13 17:59:40--  http://ftp.openvz.org/debian/archive.key
Resolving ftp.openvz.org (ftp.openvz.org)... 2620:e6::104:11, 199.115.104.11
Connecting to ftp.openvz.org (ftp.openvz.org)|2620:e6::104:11|:80...
failed: Connection timed out.
Connecting to ftp.openvz.org (ftp.openvz.org)|199.115.104.11|:80... connected.


checking with telnet:
root@mu2 /home/coolcold # telnet -6 ftp.openvz.org 80
Trying 2620:e6::104:11...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection timed out


and yandex is ok:
coolcold@mu2:~/gits/flashcache$ telnet -6 www.ya.ru 80
Trying 2a02:6b8::3...
Connected to ya.ru.
Escape character is '^]'.
^]
telnet> quit
Connection closed.


should you disable ipv6 resolve?



___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] IPv6

2015-02-03 Thread Matt
Recently IPv6 quit working on my Openvz CentOS 6 box.  No longer works
on host or containers.  I imagine it was after a yum update.  Whats
weird is if I reboot the OpenVZ host machine IPv6 starts to work again
on the host and the containers for about 5 minutes but then quits
again.  Any ideas?

I installed following these directions.

https://openvz.org/Quick_installation

With some changes found here to allow bridged containers and IPv6.

https://openvz.org/Quick_Installation_CentOS_6
http://openvz.org/Virtual_Ethernet_device
https://openvz.org/IPv6
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6

2015-02-03 Thread Scott Dowdle
Greetings,

- Original Message -
 Recently IPv6 quit working on my Openvz CentOS 6 box.  No longer works
 on host or containers.  I imagine it was after a yum update.  Whats
 weird is if I reboot the OpenVZ host machine IPv6 starts to work again
 on the host and the containers for about 5 minutes but then quits
 again.  Any ideas?

I haven't used IPv6 at all so I'm ignorant about it... but you really didn't 
give much in the way of details that will probably be helpful to others who are 
familiar with IPv6.

What kernel version are you running?  What version of vzctl?

TYL,
-- 
Scott Dowdle
704 Church Street
Belgrade, MT 59714
(406)388-0827 [home]
(406)994-3931 [work]
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6

2015-02-03 Thread Kevin Holly [Fusl]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

can you ping the host machine from within the container? What does ip
- -6 r l say? Is there anything in /var/log/messages regarding IPv6?

In my host machines I had to do that in order to get IPv6 working
properly:

for proxy_ndp in /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/eth*/proxy_ndp; do echo 1 
$proxy_ndp; done



On 02/03/2015 06:04 PM, Matt wrote:
 Recently IPv6 quit working on my Openvz CentOS 6 box.  No longer
 works on host or containers.  I imagine it was after a yum update.
 Whats weird is if I reboot the OpenVZ host machine IPv6 starts to
 work again on the host and the containers for about 5 minutes but
 then quits again.  Any ideas?
 
 I installed following these directions.
 
 https://openvz.org/Quick_installation
 
 With some changes found here to allow bridged containers and IPv6.
 
 https://openvz.org/Quick_Installation_CentOS_6 
 http://openvz.org/Virtual_Ethernet_device https://openvz.org/IPv6 
 ___ Users mailing list 
 Users@openvz.org https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 

- -- 
Best regards

Kevin Holly - r...@hallowe.lt - http://hallowe.lt/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU0R/DAAoJELAaqP3QtzpM10EH/1tDnPpTx1QdAFeckNryDc2d
VORhi0aehYrIVb3ZGqjyWz7czAd1CrTSQ8bAgXD0c4ADlVf7O8ozOxaJFapB+TOB
JolO/S8191yx3Dj+Ax7Olo9dk42rzN627WXmNy8ufscvM5Pma6oql3UpUJmbCdxo
o0zuaQt6qGN/NxnIt/x6/gHIQH9DxHlQFKTG4BFPP7Wm2WaV8miVbmgs/XqHYW6s
9PuO/C4sg476dWFSK+Smsw2W0gas4f5+MdQLRtRNJSUaZbfjeG2mWwkO9pVj19Lx
oNeCzPsxD2lbgsbOJm3kEg+AMT0KPsTeKzmaIes126J5HO4C4v0aN1VaoTNOQdQ=
=U6Bx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6

2015-02-03 Thread Matt
 can you ping the host machine from within the container? What does ip
 - -6 r l say? Is there anything in /var/log/messages regarding IPv6?

Yes I can ping my own IPv6 IP.


 In my host machines I had to do that in order to get IPv6 working
 properly:

 for proxy_ndp in /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/eth*/proxy_ndp; do echo 1 
 $proxy_ndp; done


# grep ipv6 /etc/sysctl.conf
net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding = 1
net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding = 1
net.ipv6.conf.all.proxy_ndp = 1

Again this was all working fine since it was put in about year ago.
Just starting acting up in last month I am guessing.  I know it worked
fine 2 months ago.  Also, if I do service network restart on a
container IPv6 will start working again for about 5 minutes.  Same for
host.



 Recently IPv6 quit working on my Openvz CentOS 6 box.  No longer
 works on host or containers.  I imagine it was after a yum update.
 Whats weird is if I reboot the OpenVZ host machine IPv6 starts to
 work again on the host and the containers for about 5 minutes but
 then quits again.  Any ideas?

 I installed following these directions.

 https://openvz.org/Quick_installation

 With some changes found here to allow bridged containers and IPv6.

 https://openvz.org/Quick_Installation_CentOS_6
 http://openvz.org/Virtual_Ethernet_device https://openvz.org/IPv6

___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] IPv6

2014-07-10 Thread Matt
I used this guide to install OpenVZ.

https://openvz.org/Quick_Installation_CentOS_6

I am setting certain containers up as bridged so I can run IPv6 on
them.  I have IPv6 working on the host but I cannot get it to work on
the container.  The host and container can IPv6 ping each other but
the container cannot ping the IPv6 gateway or anything else.  Any
ideas?
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6

2014-07-10 Thread Dragomir Zhelev


Turn this in sysctl.conf

net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding = 1
net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding = 1
net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding = 1
net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding = 1
net.ipv6.conf.all.proxy_ndp = 1


Also check your ip6tables in host .





On 07/10/2014 05:15 PM, Matt wrote:

I used this guide to install OpenVZ.

https://openvz.org/Quick_Installation_CentOS_6

I am setting certain containers up as bridged so I can run IPv6 on
them.  I have IPv6 working on the host but I cannot get it to work on
the container.  The host and container can IPv6 ping each other but
the container cannot ping the IPv6 gateway or anything else.  Any
ideas?
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users



--
Dragomir Zhelev
CEO
Delta SoftMedia OOD
Phone: +359 2 44 84 165
Cellular: +359 895 66 99 79
E-mail: dr...@delta.bg
Web: Delta.BG
http://delta.bg
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6

2014-07-10 Thread Matt
It was an ip6tables issue.  Thanks.



On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Dragomir Zhelev dr...@delta.bg wrote:


 Turn this in sysctl.conf

 net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding = 1
 net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding = 1
 net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding = 1
 net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding = 1
 net.ipv6.conf.all.proxy_ndp = 1


 Also check your ip6tables in host .






 On 07/10/2014 05:15 PM, Matt wrote:

 I used this guide to install OpenVZ.
 https://openvz.org/Quick_Installation_CentOS_6


 I am setting certain containers up as bridged so I can run IPv6 on
 them.  I have IPv6 working on the host but I cannot get it to work on
 the container.  The host and container can IPv6 ping each other but
 the container cannot ping the IPv6 gateway or anything else.  Any
 ideas?
 ___
 Users mailing 
 listUsers@openvz.orghttps://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users



 --
 Dragomir Zhelev
 CEO
 Delta SoftMedia OOD
 Phone: +359 2 44 84 165
 Cellular: +359 895 66 99 79
 E-mail: dr...@delta.bg
 Web: Delta.BG
  http://delta.bg

 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@openvz.org
 https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] ipv6 on container

2011-02-05 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 11:57 -0600, Hospedaje Web y Servidores Dedicados
wrote:
 hi, i want to setup the ipv6 on a container, my main node has my /48
 installed, and inside the CT i do 
 
 
 --Container--
 [root@ipv6 ~]# modprobe ipv6
 FATAL: Could not
 load /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.10.1.el5.028stab067.4PAE/modules.dep: No
 such file or directory
 [root@ipv6 ~]# mkdir
 -p /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.10.1.el5.028stab067.4PAE/
 [root@ipv6 ~]# depmod -a
 [root@ipv6 ~]# modprobe ipv6
 FATAL: Module ipv6 not found.

 how to enable

It's probably already enabled.  If it's enabled in the host node it's
going to be enabled in the guest.

Run ip -6 addr ls in the guest.  You should see something like this:

[root@yelm ~]# ip -6 addr ls
13: eth0: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP mtu 1500 qlen 1000
inet6 2001:4830:3000:8200:204:8ff:fecd:263d/64 scope global dynamic 
   valid_lft 2591958sec preferred_lft 604758sec
inet6 fe80::204:8ff:fecd:263d/64 scope link 
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
15: lo: LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP mtu 16436 
inet6 ::1/128 scope host 
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

You see anything with inet6 addresses, you've got it enabled.  It may
not be configured, but you've got it enabled.

 -- 
 Ing. Alejandro M.
 ---
 Hospedaje Web y Servidores Dedicados
 http://www.dedicados.com.mx
 ---
 ven...@dedicados.com.mx
 ---

Mike
-- 
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 |  m...@wittsend.com
   /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/  | (678) 463-0932 |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
   NIC whois: MHW9  | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0x674627FF| possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] ipv6 on container

2011-02-03 Thread Hospedaje Web y Servidores Dedicados


  
  
hi, i want to setup the ipv6 on a container, my
  main node has my /48 installed, and inside the CT i do 


--Container--
[root@ipv6 ~]# modprobe ipv6
FATAL: Could not load
/lib/modules/2.6.18-164.10.1.el5.028stab067.4PAE/modules.dep: No
such file or directory
[root@ipv6 ~]# mkdir -p
/lib/modules/2.6.18-164.10.1.el5.028stab067.4PAE/
[root@ipv6 ~]# depmod -a
[root@ipv6 ~]# modprobe ipv6
FATAL: Module ipv6 not found.

how to enable
-- 
Ing. Alejandro M.
---
Hospedaje Web y Servidores Dedicados
http://www.dedicados.com.mx
---
ven...@dedicados.com.mx
---

  

___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] ipv6 on container

2011-02-03 Thread Antonio Querubin

On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Hospedaje Web y Servidores Dedicados wrote:


hi, i want to setup the ipv6 on a container, my main node has my /48


Have you looked at:

http://wiki.openvz.org/VEs_and_HNs_in_same_subnets


Antonio Querubin
e-mail/xmpp:  t...@lava.net
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] ipv6 on container

2011-02-03 Thread Jean-Marc Pigeon
hello,

On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 04:03 -1000, Antonio Querubin wrote:
 On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Hospedaje Web y Servidores Dedicados wrote:
 
  hi, i want to setup the ipv6 on a container, my main node has my /48
 
 Have you looked at:
 
 http://wiki.openvz.org/VEs_and_HNs_in_same_subnets
I confirm this is working no trouble..

Note:
If you have container dual stack (IPV4,IPV6)
but NOT all container on the IPV4 subnet,
you need to define a second bridge on
the host (with the IPV6 number) and container
with a second interface (eth1) attached to 
the host second bridge.

Having the container set with one interface
carrying both IPV6+IPV6, but not all the container
on the same IPV4 subnet make the routing quite
unreliable.
 
 
 Antonio Querubin
 e-mail/xmpp:  t...@lava.net
 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@openvz.org
 https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 
A bientôt
==
Jean-Marc Pigeon   Internet: j...@safe.ca
SAFE Inc.  Phone: (514) 493-4280
   Fax:   (514) 493-1946
Clement, 'a kiss solution' to get rid of SPAM (at last)
   Clement' Home base http://www.clement.safe.ca;
==


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] IPv6: PMTU disc is broken in stable RHEL5 kernel for VETH

2010-10-29 Thread Benoit Branciard

Hi,

Some days ago I submitted a bug to point out a problem we encountered in 
path MTU discovery not working properly for IPv6 VETH interfaces:


http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1675

This report didn't receive any feedback for now.

Could someone have a look at this problem ?
PMTU discovery is a mandatory feature for proper IPv6 functionnality 
(apart from crippling down the MTU globally on the interface).


According to our tests done so far, the problem can be reproduced in any 
bridged VETH configuration, whatever interface is bridged in (a 
bare-metal physical one, a bonding, a VLAN, or even a VLAN over a bonding).


However, it does not show up with VENET interfaces in the 
distribution-standard config (arp-proxy-based routed mode); it appears 
to be veth-specific.



--
Benoit BRANCIARD

CRIR - SIS
Centre de Ressources Informatiques et du Réseau,
Service Infrastructures
http://crir.univ-paris1.fr
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne

Tel. 01 44 07 89 68

--
Ce message a ete verifie par MailScanner
pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de
suspect n'a ete trouve.


___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] IPv6 with OpenVZ; new Owl ISOs and templates

2010-07-29 Thread Solar Designer
Hi,

Simon, a user of and a contributor to Openwall GNU/*/Linux (Owl), wrote
the following how-to on setting up OpenVZ containers reachable over IPv6:

https://azuma.kaizo.org/simonb/openvz+ipv6.php

This describes the following setup:
* You have 'a' machine, with a single public facing Internet address (IPv4)
* This machine has a public facing IPv6 address range, in this case a /64.
* You have IPv4 and IPv6 working on the machine already
* You run OpenVZ (or similar) VM's which have rfc1918 addresses
* You use NAT/IPTables to route traffic to those OpenVZ hosts
* You *wish* to allocate some Internet routable IPv6 addresses to the VM's

More context to it (also on a hosting provider in the UK allowing you to
setup Owl/OpenVZ in a Linux KVM based VPS with IPv4 + IPv6 connectivity):

http://www.openwall.com/lists/owl-users/2010/07/29/1

Meanwhile, we have fresh Owl ISOs (with the latest OpenVZ rhel5 kernels)
and precreated OpenVZ container templates:

lftp mirrors.kernel.org:/openwall/Owl/current ls iso vztemplate | fgrep 0729
-rw-r--r-- 455M  2010-07-29 02:53  Owl-current-20100729-i686.iso.gz
-rw-r--r-- 460M  2010-07-29 03:37  Owl-current-20100729-x86_64.iso.gz
-rw-r--r-- 110M  2010-07-29 05:06  owl-current-20100729-i686.tar.gz
-rw-r--r-- 112M  2010-07-29 04:43  owl-current-20100729-x86_64.tar.gz

As usual, the ISOs are live + installable (and they will offer ext4
now), and the templates are full Owl installs (e.g. capable of
rebuilding Owl from source).  Any feedback is welcome.

Alexander
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] IPv6 tables state module in 2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64

2010-04-08 Thread Jan Tomasek
Hi,

I'm running OpenVZ HW node on Debian Lenny with Debian stock kernel
2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64

When I try to use ip6tables ... -m state I get:

 ip6tables: Invalid argument

and HW node kernel prints:

 can't load conntrack support for proto=10

Have changed something since 2.6.18? My ip6tables were taken from
2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.028stab064.8 where they works just fine.

Piece of FW definition:

 /sbin/ip6tables -N STATE
 /sbin/ip6tables -A STATE -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
 ip6tables: Invalid argument

Piece of /etc/vz.conf:

 ## IPv4 iptables kernel modules
 IPTABLES=ipt_REJECT ipt_tos ipt_limit ipt_multiport iptable_filter 
 iptable_mangle ipt_TCPMSS ipt_tcpmss ipt_ttl ipt_length ipt_LOG ipt_state 
 ipt_conntrack ip_conntrack ip_conntrack_ftp xt_state
 
 ## Enable IPv6
 IPV6=yes
 
 ## IPv6 ip6tables kernel modules
 IP6TABLES=ip6_tables ip6table_filter ip6table_mangle ip6t_REJECT ip6t_hl 
 ip6t_rt xt_conntrack nt_conntrack nf_conntrack_ipv6 xt_state

cat /boot/config-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 | grep IP6
 CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6=m
 CONFIG_IP6_NF_QUEUE=m
 CONFIG_IP6_NF_IPTABLES=m
 CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_RT=m
 CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_OPTS=m
 CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_FRAG=m
 CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_HL=m
 CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_IPV6HEADER=m
 CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_AH=m
 CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_MH=m
 CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_EUI64=m
 CONFIG_IP6_NF_FILTER=m
 CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_LOG=m
 CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_REJECT=m
 CONFIG_IP6_NF_MANGLE=m
 CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_HL=m
 CONFIG_IP6_NF_RAW=m
 CONFIG_SLIP_MODE_SLIP6=y


Any suggestions please?
-- 
---
Jan Tomasek aka Semik
http://www.tomasek.cz/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6 Support in VE's

2009-11-27 Thread Antonio Querubin

On Thu, 26 Nov 2009, Michael H. Warfield wrote:


Hey hey...

On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 14:25 -1000, Antonio Querubin wrote:

Care to share your IPv6 configs for the VEs with the rest of us?  The
wiki's IPv6 examples don't seem to work for us here.


Sure.  Not problem.  They're small enough I'll just do them in-line


It works!  One problem left to figure out is how to disable the automatic 
munging of the GATEWAY in each VE's /etc/sysconfig/network file.  For now 
I'm forcing it in each VE's ifcfg-eth0 file.



here.  I gave up on the IPv6 stuff in the wiki ages ago as simply going
way off in the wrong direction.  Too much fixation on the vnet device.
I think this topic came up years ago on the list and all I heard back
was excuses about why it didn't support MAC addresses and how we didn't
need MAC addresses and all kinds of IPv4 think wrt IPv6.  Whadeva...
Dump the vnet cruft and forget about it.


Concur.

Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp:  t...@lava.net
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] IPv6 Support in VE's

2009-11-18 Thread Matt Richards
Hello,

I have OpenVZ setup and running with ipv4 without any issues.

I would like to get ipv6 address to the ve's

My network currently has ipv6 and the hardware nodes have ipv6 addresses
assigned to them.

I currently have ipv6 built into the kernel and also enabled in
/etc/vz/vz.conf

If I add an ipv6 address to a VE when i try to start it i get the
following ...

virt1 linux # vzctl start 46
Starting VE ...
VE is mounted
Adding IP address(es): 192.168.4.46 2001:470:9002:2::46
RTNETLINK answers: No such device
vps-net_add ERROR: Unable to add route /sbin/ip route add
2001:470:9002:2::46 dev venet0
VE start failed
Stopping VE ...
VE was stopped
VE is unmounted

Does anybody know why I might be getting this and what else I can check.
The next thing I would try is running ipv6 as a kernel module but it
would be nice if this wasn't necessary.

my vzctl version is ...

vzctl version 3.0.22

Cheers,

Matt.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6 ?? *SOLVED*

2008-01-31 Thread Benoit Branciard

Jan Tomasek a écrit :

Benoit Branciard wrote:


IPv6 forwarding is still mandatory, but this implies manual 
configuration of IP address, netmask and default route on hardware 
node. This last point may be annoying: in our case the default route 
is hardware-dependent, so if some day we need to replace the router 
(or the router interface), default route will become invalid and 
manual reconfiguration of all openVZ hardware nodes will be needed.
Too bad Linux kernel doesn't allow enabling forwarding without 
disabling autoconfiguration.


I'm not sure, but I think that my setup is router independent. For my 
virtual servers I got prefix 2001:718:1:e::/64 (which is unbelivable 
waste of IP range but they say this is normal in IPv6). This network 
block is asigned to dedicated VLAN. IPv6 Gateway for all physical 
systems in that network is 2001:718:1:e::1.


Here's the clue: you have been assigned a static gateway IP address by 
your network provider. So no problem.


In our case we are operating our nework, and have chosen to not set 
static gateway IP adresses, relying on autoconfiguration to discover the 
EUI-64 (MAC-dependant) default route IP. That sounded nice (nothing to 
hardcode) until openVZ came on.
Maybe we could change our router config policy, and assign static IP 
addresses to router interfaces. But that's not trivial operation, 
involving network downtime, and we wont do that without motivated reasons.


--
Ce message a ete verifie par MailScanner
pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de
suspect n'a ete trouve.

___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6 ?? *SOLVED*

2008-01-30 Thread Benoit Branciard

Benoit Branciard a écrit :


- IPv6 VS doesn't work !!! (ping6 works *only* between VS and hardware 
node, not from external sources; VS has IPv6 address correctly defined, 
as per ifconfig).




For list archives:

It was caused by a small bug in vzctl scripts which handle 
NEIGHBOUR_DEVS=detect feature introduced in vzctl 3.0.22 : neighbour 
devices were not detected for IPv6.


Fix is here: 
http://git.altlinux.org/people/ldv/packages/?p=vzctl.git;a=commitdiff;h=maint


Thanks to Jan, Kir and Dmitry !

I suspected it may be useful to set sysctl 
net.ipv6.conf.iface.forwarding to 1, but :
- this turns the box in router mode, disabling RA acceptance from 
default router (annoying)


IPv6 forwarding is still mandatory, but this implies manual 
configuration of IP address, netmask and default route on hardware node. 
This last point may be annoying: in our case the default route is 
hardware-dependent, so if some day we need to replace the router (or the 
router interface), default route will become invalid and manual 
reconfiguration of all openVZ hardware nodes will be needed.
Too bad Linux kernel doesn't allow enabling forwarding without disabling 
autoconfiguration.


--
Ce message a ete verifie par MailScanner
pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de
suspect n'a ete trouve.

___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6 ?? *SOLVED*

2008-01-30 Thread Jan Tomasek

Benoit Branciard wrote:
I suspected it may be useful to set sysctl 
net.ipv6.conf.iface.forwarding to 1, but :
- this turns the box in router mode, disabling RA acceptance from 
default router (annoying)


IPv6 forwarding is still mandatory, but this implies manual 
configuration of IP address, netmask and default route on hardware node. 
This last point may be annoying: in our case the default route is 
hardware-dependent, so if some day we need to replace the router (or the 
router interface), default route will become invalid and manual 
reconfiguration of all openVZ hardware nodes will be needed.
Too bad Linux kernel doesn't allow enabling forwarding without disabling 
autoconfiguration.


I'm not sure, but I think that my setup is router independent. For my 
virtual servers I got prefix 2001:718:1:e::/64 (which is unbelivable 
waste of IP range but they say this is normal in IPv6). This network 
block is asigned to dedicated VLAN. IPv6 Gateway for all physical 
systems in that network is 2001:718:1:e::1.


My setup on HW node is:

iface eth0 inet6 static
post-up /sbin/sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.eth0.autoconf=0
post-up /sbin/sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
address 2001:718:1:e::23:3254
gateway 2001:718:1:e::1
netmask 64

I'm trying to stay away of MAC dependent automaticaly asigned IPs 
because of dependence on hardware.


I hope this might you, if needed I might try to ask our network 
specialists about more details...


Best regards
--
---
Jan Tomasek aka Semik
http://www.tomasek.cz/
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6 ??

2008-01-29 Thread Kir Kolyshkin

Can you give us the the output of
/sbin/ip a l
and
fgrep ADDRESS /etc/vz/conf/*.conf
command run on your hardware node?

Perhaps the problem is that the network interface(s) that is/are present 
on the hardware node do not belong to the same IP subnets as your VEs.


Dmitry,

Maybe it makes sense to add a warning if vz_get_neighbour_devs() returns 
an empty list, with the URL to a wiki page with long explanation?



Jan Tomasek wrote:

Hi,

problem was caused by setting:

# Controls which interfaces to send ARP requests and modify APR tables
# on.
NEIGHBOUR_DEVS=detect

this option arived with vzctl version 3.0.22 when I was upgrading from 
3.0.18-1dso1.


After I removed that option and restarted HW node all IPv6 hosts get 
imediately online. Ufff! :)




___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6 ??

2008-01-28 Thread Jan Tomasek

Hi,

problem was caused by setting:

# Controls which interfaces to send ARP requests and modify APR tables
# on.
NEIGHBOUR_DEVS=detect

this option arived with vzctl version 3.0.22 when I was upgrading from 
3.0.18-1dso1.


After I removed that option and restarted HW node all IPv6 hosts get 
imediately online. Ufff! :)


--
---
Jan Tomasek aka Semik
http://www.tomasek.cz/
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] IPv6 ??

2008-01-24 Thread Benoit Branciard
Temporarily giving up messing with veth devices (forgot dhcpd server for 
now), I concentrated on setting up a basic VS with both IPv4 and IPv6 
addresses, using standard venet device.


I'm using Debian Etch hardware node with debian.systs.org packages.

So I did:

- install packages and reboot as necessary :
fzakernel-2.6.18-686 vzctl vzctl-ostmpl-debian vzdump vzprocps vzquota

- ensure /etc/sysctl.conf contains :

net.ipv4.conf.default.forwarding = 1
net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter = 1
kernel.sysrq = 1
net.ipv4.conf.default.send_redirects = 1
net.ipv4.conf.all.send_redirects = 0

- ensure /etc/vz/vz.conf contains:
IPV6=yes

- create VS :
vzctl create 112 --ipadd XXX.YYY.ZZZ.12 --ipadd xxx:yyy:::12 
--hostname brahma-vps112


(default template is debian-4.0-i386-minimal, hardware node has only one 
physical interface activated, on the same subnet as VS)


- start VS :
vzctl start 112


Result:

- IPv4 VS works as expected (ping succeeds from hardware node, external 
server in same subnet, external server on another subnet).


- IPv6 VS doesn't work !!! (ping6 works *only* between VS and hardware 
node, not from external sources; VS has IPv6 address correctly defined, 
as per ifconfig).


Am I missing something ?

I suspected it may be useful to set sysctl 
net.ipv6.conf.iface.forwarding to 1, but :
- this turns the box in router mode, disabling RA acceptance from 
default router (annoying)

- this doesn't work either !!


--
Ce message a ete verifie par MailScanner
pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de
suspect n'a ete trouve.

___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6 ??

2008-01-24 Thread Thorsten Schifferdecker
Hi,

for official IPv6 i'm useing sixxs as tunnelbroker,
these steps i've done connect a Debian OpenVZ system
to a IPv6 Network for the VE with a venet0 interface:

1) Setup an IPv6 Tunnel (- https://noc.sixxs.net/ )

Relevant IPv6 settings in /etc/network/interfaces
[...]
# device: sixxs ipv6 tunnel with static IPv6
auto sixxs
iface sixxs inet6 v4tunnel
address your_assigned_IPv6_ADDRESS
netmask 64
endpoint IPv4_ADDRESS_of_tunnelbroker
ttl 64
up ip link set mtu 1280 dev sixxs
up ip route add default via IPv6_ADDRESS_of_tunnelbroker dev sixxs
[...]

VE_0$ ifup sixxs

2) Setup OpenVZ with IPv6 :

# enable IPv6 forwarding for all Interfaces
VE_0$ sysctl -q -w net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1

# enable IPv6 in /etc/vz/vz.conf - IPV6=yes
# and restart OpenVZ Subsystem, so venet has a IPv6 Address
VE_0$ /etc/init.d/vz restart

# give a VE an IPv6 address, you need a IPv6 subnet (
https://noc.sixxs.net/ )
VE_0$ vzctl set VEID --ipadd IPv6_ADDRESS [--yes]

3) Test it
If you connected to an official IPv6 network, you can test it, by pinging
debian.systs.org ( 2001:6f8:109a::1a01 ) or visit IPv6 sites like
http://www.kame.net and see the dancing turtle ;-)

Bye,
 Thorsten
--
Thorsten Schifferdecker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---//---

Am Do, 24.01.2008, 18:29, schrieb Benoit Branciard:
 Temporarily giving up messing with veth devices (forgot dhcpd server for
 now), I concentrated on setting up a basic VS with both IPv4 and IPv6
 addresses, using standard venet device.

 I'm using Debian Etch hardware node with debian.systs.org packages.

 So I did:

 - install packages and reboot as necessary :
 fzakernel-2.6.18-686 vzctl vzctl-ostmpl-debian vzdump vzprocps vzquota

 - ensure /etc/sysctl.conf contains :

 net.ipv4.conf.default.forwarding = 1
 net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter = 1
 kernel.sysrq = 1
 net.ipv4.conf.default.send_redirects = 1
 net.ipv4.conf.all.send_redirects = 0

 - ensure /etc/vz/vz.conf contains:
 IPV6=yes

 - create VS :
 vzctl create 112 --ipadd XXX.YYY.ZZZ.12 --ipadd xxx:yyy:::12
 --hostname brahma-vps112

 (default template is debian-4.0-i386-minimal, hardware node has only one
 physical interface activated, on the same subnet as VS)

 - start VS :
 vzctl start 112


 Result:

 - IPv4 VS works as expected (ping succeeds from hardware node, external
 server in same subnet, external server on another subnet).

 - IPv6 VS doesn't work !!! (ping6 works *only* between VS and hardware
 node, not from external sources; VS has IPv6 address correctly defined,
 as per ifconfig).

 Am I missing something ?

 I suspected it may be useful to set sysctl
 net.ipv6.conf.iface.forwarding to 1, but :
 - this turns the box in router mode, disabling RA acceptance from
 default router (annoying)
 - this doesn't work either !!

___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6 ??

2008-01-24 Thread Jan Tomasek
Hello Benoit,

 Temporarily giving up messing with veth devices (forgot dhcpd server for
 now), I concentrated on setting up a basic VS with both IPv4 and IPv6
 addresses, using standard venet device.

 [...]

 Result:
 
 - IPv4 VS works as expected (ping succeeds from hardware node, external
 server in same subnet, external server on another subnet).
 
 - IPv6 VS doesn't work !!! (ping6 works *only* between VS and hardware
 node, not from external sources; VS has IPv6 address correctly defined,
 as per ifconfig).
 
 Am I missing something ?
 
 I suspected it may be useful to set sysctl
 net.ipv6.conf.iface.forwarding to 1, but :
 - this turns the box in router mode, disabling RA acceptance from
 default router (annoying)
 - this doesn't work either !!

Very interesting! I'm having exactly same problem here. IPv6 was working
perfectly for me after some problems before several months. Now I had to
reboot my HW node and IPv6 is gone.

When I try to ping VE from real world I'm getting:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping6 2001:718:1:e::23:3257
 PING 2001:718:1:e::23:3257(2001:718:1:e::23:3257) 56 data bytes
 From 2001:718:1:101::1 icmp_seq=0 Destination unreachable: Address unreachable
 From 2001:718:1:101::1 icmp_seq=3 Destination unreachable: Address unreachable

From HW node to VE or from one VE to another VE is IPv6 working fine. I
think that HW node didn't sent some info to it's IPv6 gateway about
presence of new IPv6 address. Sadly I'm clue less how to better debug
this. But!

I've discovered trick. Run alternate version of this on your HW node:

 ifconfig eth0 add 2001:718:1:e::23:3257/64
 sleep 5
 ping6 -I 2001:718:1:e::23:3257 -c 1 2001:718:1:e::1
 ifconfig eth0 del 2001:718:1:e::23:3257/64

2001:718:1:e::23:3257 - IPv6 address of VE
2001:718:1:e::1 - gateway

That will cause that router will learn about presence of VE. It lasts
for several hours. I discovered it at about 17 clock and now at 22 are
VE still IPv6 online... but I'm afraid that clearing IPv6 neighbours
table on router will kill this. Something is not working on HW node.


I'm running 2.6.18-028stab051 on Debian Etch. Output of sysctl -a |grep
net.ipv6 | sort /tmp/chlivek.ipv6 is attached. Hope someone will point
out where problem is. Yesterday I've reboot my second HW node...

-- 
---
Jan Tomasek aka Semik
http://www.tomasek.cz/
net.ipv6.bindv6only = 0
net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra = 1
net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra_defrtr = 1
net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra_pinfo = 1
net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra_rtr_pref = 1
net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_redirects = 1
net.ipv6.conf.all.autoconf = 1
net.ipv6.conf.all.dad_transmits = 1
net.ipv6.conf.all.force_mld_version = 0
net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding = 1
net.ipv6.conf.all.hop_limit = 64
net.ipv6.conf.all.max_addresses = 16
net.ipv6.conf.all.max_desync_factor = 600
net.ipv6.conf.all.mtu = 1280
net.ipv6.conf.all.regen_max_retry = 5
net.ipv6.conf.all.router_probe_interval = 60
net.ipv6.conf.all.router_solicitation_delay = 1
net.ipv6.conf.all.router_solicitation_interval = 4
net.ipv6.conf.all.router_solicitations = 3
net.ipv6.conf.all.temp_prefered_lft = 86400
net.ipv6.conf.all.temp_valid_lft = 604800
net.ipv6.conf.all.use_tempaddr = 0
net.ipv6.conf.default.accept_ra = 1
net.ipv6.conf.default.accept_ra_defrtr = 1
net.ipv6.conf.default.accept_ra_pinfo = 1
net.ipv6.conf.default.accept_ra_rtr_pref = 1
net.ipv6.conf.default.accept_redirects = 1
net.ipv6.conf.default.autoconf = 1
net.ipv6.conf.default.dad_transmits = 1
net.ipv6.conf.default.force_mld_version = 0
net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding = 1
net.ipv6.conf.default.hop_limit = 64
net.ipv6.conf.default.max_addresses = 16
net.ipv6.conf.default.max_desync_factor = 600
net.ipv6.conf.default.mtu = 1280
net.ipv6.conf.default.regen_max_retry = 5
net.ipv6.conf.default.router_probe_interval = 60
net.ipv6.conf.default.router_solicitation_delay = 1
net.ipv6.conf.default.router_solicitation_interval = 4
net.ipv6.conf.default.router_solicitations = 3
net.ipv6.conf.default.temp_prefered_lft = 86400
net.ipv6.conf.default.temp_valid_lft = 604800
net.ipv6.conf.default.use_tempaddr = 0
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.accept_ra = 1
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.accept_ra_defrtr = 1
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.accept_ra_pinfo = 1
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.accept_ra_rtr_pref = 1
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.accept_redirects = 1
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.autoconf = 0
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.dad_transmits = 1
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.force_mld_version = 0
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.forwarding = 1
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.hop_limit = 64
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.max_addresses = 16
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.max_desync_factor = 600
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.mtu = 1500
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.regen_max_retry = 5
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.router_probe_interval = 60
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.router_solicitation_delay = 1
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.router_solicitation_interval = 4
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.router_solicitations = 3
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.temp_prefered_lft = 86400
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.temp_valid_lft = 604800
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.use_tempaddr = 0
net.ipv6.conf.lo.accept_ra = 1
net.ipv6.conf.lo.accept_ra_defrtr = 1

Re: [Users] IPv6 ??

2008-01-24 Thread Jan Tomasek
Hi,

Thorsten Schifferdecker wrote:
 @jan: how get your IPv6 connectivity ?

I've static setup on HW node:

iface eth0 inet6 static
post-up /sbin/sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.eth0.autoconf=0
post-up /sbin/sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
address 2001:718:1:e::23:3254
gateway 2001:718:1:e::1
netmask 64

Traceroute from HW node:

 chlivek:~# traceroute6 2001:838:1:1:210:dcff:fe20:7c7c
 traceroute to 2001:838:1:1:210:dcff:fe20:7c7c 
 (2001:838:1:1:210:dcff:fe20:7c7c) from 2001:718:1:e::23:3254, 30 hops max, 16 
 byte packets
  1  2001:718:1:e::1 (2001:718:1:e::1)  0.983 ms  4.869 ms  2.949 ms
  2  2001:718:0:607::1 (2001:718:0:607::1)  4.943 ms  4.823 ms  2.895 ms
  3  2001:718:0:607::2 (2001:718:0:607::2)  4.929 ms  4.867 ms  2.968 ms
  4  ipv6-ge-2-1-0.prg11.ip.tiscali.net (2001:7f8:14::3:1)  3.359 ms  3.328 ms 
  4.439 ms
  5  so-5-1-0.fra40.ip6.tiscali.net (2001:668:0:2::1:291)  9.113 ms  8.861 ms  
 14.915 ms
  6  so-4-1-0.dus11.ip6.tiscali.net (2001:668:0:2::1:402)  12.322 ms  12.146 
 ms  15.893 ms
  7  so-7-0-0.ams22.ip6.tiscali.net (2001:668:0:2::1:482)  15.88 ms  16.848 ms 
  15.919 ms
  8  so-6-0-0.ams11.ip6.tiscali.net (2001:668:0:2::1:271)  15.889 ms  15.955 
 ms  14.971 ms
  9  ge6-2-0.br0.ams3.nl.gbxs.net (2001:7f8:1::a500:9009:1)  15.511 ms  15.454 
 ms  15.972 ms
 10  ams-ix2.ipv6.concepts.nl (2001:7f8:1::a501:2871:2)  15.437 ms  15.937 ms  
 15.837 ms
 11  2001:838:0:14::2 (2001:838:0:14::2)  16.108 ms  15.294 ms  16.615 ms
 12  2001:838:0:10::2 (2001:838:0:10::2)  21.508 ms  21.488 ms  17.428 ms
 13  noc.sixxs.net (2001:838:1:1:210:dcff:fe20:7c7c)  21.508 ms  21.46 ms  
 18.441 ms


From VE (differnet IP, that 3257 was just experiemnt with my trick).

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# traceroute6 2001:838:1:1:210:dcff:fe20:7c7c
 traceroute to 2001:838:1:1:210:dcff:fe20:7c7c 
 (2001:838:1:1:210:dcff:fe20:7c7c) from 2001:718:1:e::23:3248, 30 hops max, 16 
 byte packets
  1  2001:718:1:e::23:3254 (2001:718:1:e::23:3254)  0.045 ms  0.015 ms  0.011 
 ms
  2  2001:718:0:607::1 (2001:718:0:607::1)  1.105 ms  0.837 ms  1.381 ms
  3  2001:718:0:607::2 (2001:718:0:607::2)  0.663 ms  0.44 ms  0.373 ms
  4  ipv6-ge-2-1-0.prg11.ip.tiscali.net (2001:7f8:14::3:1)  0.566 ms  0.529 ms 
  0.529 ms
  5  so-5-1-0.fra40.ip6.tiscali.net (2001:668:0:2::1:291)  8.551 ms  8.493 ms  
 8.499 ms
  6  so-4-1-0.dus11.ip6.tiscali.net (2001:668:0:2::1:402)  11.302 ms  11.26 ms 
  11.256 ms
  7  so-0-0-0.ams22.ip6.tiscali.net (2001:668:0:2::1:122)  15.086 ms  15.044 
 ms  15.039 ms
  8  pos-7-5-0.ams11.ip6.tiscali.net (2001:668:0:2::630)  14.943 ms  14.945 ms 
  15.464 ms
  9  ge6-2-0.br0.ams3.nl.gbxs.net (2001:7f8:1::a500:9009:1)  15.65 ms  15.52 
 ms  16.392 ms
 10  ams-ix2.ipv6.concepts.nl (2001:7f8:1::a501:2871:2)  17.111 ms  15.812 ms  
 15.879 ms
 11  2001:838:0:14::2 (2001:838:0:14::2)  16.031 ms  15.915 ms  15.91 ms
 12  2001:838:0:10::2 (2001:838:0:10::2)  17.83 ms  18.28 ms  17.903 ms
 13  noc.sixxs.net (2001:838:1:1:210:dcff:fe20:7c7c)  17.661 ms  18.263 ms  
 17.993 ms

Could you please try traceroute at 2001:718:1:e::23:3254? Path seams to
be different from yours. But I'm not sure if that could indicate
something bad in your IPv6 network setup. I'm not able to reach machines
which are in our own network so it looks like something more
fundamental. For IPv4 I will say that arp is not working but ...



-- 
---
Jan Tomasek aka Semik
http://www.tomasek.cz/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6 with venet

2007-07-10 Thread Jan Tomasek

Vitaliy Gusev wrote:

Please check  /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/forwarding


It is disabled:

 staj-dev:~# for f in /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/*/forwarding; do echo $f; 
cat $f; done

 /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/forwarding
 0
 /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/default/forwarding
 0
 /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/eth0/forwarding
 0
 /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/lo/forwarding
 0
 /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/venet0/forwarding
 0

Problem is that when I do:

 echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/forwarding

HW node stops responding on IPv6 ping, reason probably is that setting 
that removes default GW:


 staj-dev:~# route -6
 Kernel IPv6 routing table
 Destination Next Hop 
  Flags Metric RefUse Iface
 ::1/128 :: 
  U 0  13   1 lo
 2001:718:1:e::/128  :: 
  U 0  02 lo
 2001:718:1:e::23:3004/128   :: 
  U 0  266   1 lo
 2001:718:1:e::/64   :: 
  U 256217   0 eth0
 fe80::/128  :: 
  U 0  02 lo
 fe80::1/128 :: 
  U 0  01 lo
 fe80::213:72ff:fe1b:b97/128 :: 
  U 0  81 lo
 fe80::/64   :: 
  U 25600 eth0
 fe80::/64   :: 
  U 25600 venet0
 ff02::1/128 ff02::1 
  UC0  229   0 eth0
 ff00::/8:: 
  U 25600 eth0
 ff00::/8:: 
  U 25600 venet0


When I set GW manualy it start work and it works also for VE. GREAT!


Well and now. Why setting forwarding=1 removes GW? Is there any way how 
to add it there automaticaly without my attention? I'm afraid that GW IP 
fe80::215:faff:fe87:3100 is somehow related to router MAC and that it 
will change when router become replaced. Any sugestion on this?


Thanks a lot!
--
---
Jan Tomasek aka Semik
http://www.tomasek.cz/
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6 with venet

2007-07-10 Thread Thorsten Schifferdecker
Hi Jan,

Jan Tomasek schrieb:
 Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
 Please check  /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/forwarding
 [...]
 Problem is that when I do:
 
  echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/forwarding
 
 HW node stops responding on IPv6 ping, reason probably is that setting
 that removes default GW:

Router Advertisements (=autoconfiguration) are ignored on setting
forward to 1 to IPv6 proc settings and your (automatic) default route (
::0 ), is set to a RA IPv6 (link-local) address, is gone.

for Debian you can set IPv6 (addy and route) on your VE0 (hardware node):

--8--( /etc/network/interfaces )--
[...]
iface DEVICE
[...]
iface DEVICE inet6 static
address IPv6_ADDRESS
netmask NETMASK
gateway IPv6_ADDRESS_of_your_GATEWAY
# set IPv6 forwarding here or in /etc/sysctl.conf
# read man page of interfaces (5)
[...]
--8--

Regards,
Thorsten Schifferdecker
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] IPv6 with venet

2007-07-09 Thread Jan Tomasek

Hi,

after upgrade to vzctl version 3.0.18-1dso1 I got new set of 
/etc/vz/dists/scripts/. There were changes in IPv6 code for Debian.


Thanks to those changes now IPv6 works between HW node and VE:

 staj-dev:~# ping6 2001:718:1:e::23:3005
 PING 2001:718:1:e::23:3005(2001:718:1:e::23:3005) 56 data bytes
 64 bytes from 2001:718:1:e::23:3005: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.068 ms

Problem is that I still can not reach VE from outside (staff is box with 
IPv6 support).


 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping6 2001:718:1:e::23:3005
 PING 2001:718:1:e::23:3005(2001:718:1:e::23:3005) 56 data bytes

ping does not show anything, it just hangs. In tcpdump on HW node I see:


15:38:41.465836 802.1d unknown version
15:38:41.498548 IP6 staff.cesnet.cz  2001:718:1:e::23:3005: ICMP6, echo 
request, seq 923, length 64
15:38:42.498349 IP6 staff.cesnet.cz  2001:718:1:e::23:3005: ICMP6, echo 
request, seq 924, length 64
15:38:43.462572 802.1d unknown version
15:38:43.498152 IP6 staff.cesnet.cz  2001:718:1:e::23:3005: ICMP6, echo 
request, seq 925, length 64
15:38:43.733136 arp who-has 195.113.233.73 tell 195.113.233.1
15:38:44.497951 IP6 staff.cesnet.cz  2001:718:1:e::23:3005: ICMP6, echo 
request, seq 926, length 64
15:38:45.427653 IP6 fe80::215:faff:fe87:3100  ip6-allnodes: ICMP6, router 
advertisement, length 64
15:38:45.462453 802.1d unknown version
15:38:45.497753 IP6 staff.cesnet.cz  2001:718:1:e::23:3005: ICMP6, echo 
request, seq 927, length 64
15:38:46.497552 IP6 staff.cesnet.cz  2001:718:1:e::23:3005: ICMP6, echo 
request, seq 928, length 64


I was suspecting route problems but routes does look ok. VE:


[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# route -6
Kernel IPv6 routing table
Destination Next Hop
Flags Metric RefUse Iface
::1/128 ::  U 0  11 lo  
::1/128 ::  U 0  01 lo  
2001:718:1:e::23:3005/128   ::  U 0  13   1 lo  
2001:718:1:101:20b:dbff:fe93:5c38/128   2001:718:1:101:20b:dbff:fe93:5c38   UC0  101   0 venet0  
fe80::/64   ::  U 25600 venet0  
ff00::/8::  U 25600 venet0  
::/0::  U 25600 venet0  


HW node:


staj-dev:/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/venet0# route -6
Kernel IPv6 routing table
Destination Next Hop
Flags Metric RefUse Iface
::1/128 ::  U 0  81 lo  
2001:718:1:e::23:3004/128   ::  U 0  926   1 lo  
2001:718:1:e::23:3005/128   ::  U 1024   00 venet0  
2001:718:1:e:213:72ff:fe1b:b97/128  ::  U 0  01 lo  
2001:718:1:e::/64   ::  U 256302   0 eth0
fe80::1/128 ::  U 0  01 lo  
fe80::213:72ff:fe1b:b97/128 ::  U 0  58   1 lo  
fe80::/64   ::  U 25600 eth0
fe80::/64   ::  U 25600 venet0  
ff02::1/128 ff02::1 UC0  327   0 eth0
ff00::/8::  U 25600 eth0
ff00::/8::  U 25600 venet0  
::/0fe80::215:faff:fe87:3100UGDA  1024   483   0 eth0


Please, does anyone have any sugestions?

--
---
Jan Tomasek aka Semik
http://www.tomasek.cz/
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6 again but this time with veth

2007-06-29 Thread Vitaliy Gusev
venet device works with IPv6!
Describe steps which you did for venet device. 


On the Thursday 28 June 2007 22:44 Jan Tomasek, wrote:

 I need IPv4 and IPv6 support in VE.
 
 
 I would prefer venet interface, but that doesn't work. See thread:
 http://forum.openvz.org/index.php?t=msggoto=12809srch=IPv6#msg_12809

 Do you have any other suggestions?

-- 

Vitaliy Gusev,

___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6 again but this time with veth

2007-06-29 Thread Vitaliy Gusev
You added veth012.0 device  to the bridge br0.  How about eth0 ?

On the Friday 29 June 2007 12:23 Jan Tomasek, wrote:
 Oh. I got lost! Could I try to describe it again?
 
 My HW node is staj-dev:
 
 auto eth0
 iface eth0 inet static
  address 195.113.233.4
  netmask 255.255.255.0
  network 195.113.233.0
  broadcast 195.113.233.255
  gateway 195.113.233.1
  dns-nameservers 195.113.144.233 195.113.144.194
  dns-search cesnet.cz
 
 iface eth0 inet6 static
  post-up /sbin/sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.eth0.autoconf=0
  address 2001:718:1:e::23:3004
  netmask 64
 
 My VE node, has this config (ip6v2-test):
 
 auto eth0
 iface eth0 inet static
  address 195.113.233.12
  netmask 255.255.255.0
  network 195.113.233.0
  broadcast 195.113.233.255
  gateway 195.113.233.4
  dns-nameservers 195.113.144.233 195.113.144.194
  dns-search cesnet.cz
 
 
 eth0 inet6 static
  iface eth0 inet6 static
  address 2001:718:1:e::23:3012
  netmask 64
 
 After executing:
 
 brctl addbr vzbr0
 brctl addif vzbr0 veth012.0
 ifconfig vzbr0 0
 echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/vzbr0/forwarding
 echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/vzbr0/proxy_arp
 echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/forwarding
 echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/proxy_arp
 ip route add 195.113.233.12 dev vzbr0
 ip route add 2001:718:1:e::23:3012 dev vzbr0
 
 **MARK**
 
 VE starts to be reachable from Internet on IPv4. What should I do next?
 
 echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/eth0/forwarding
 
 somehow broke IPv6 for HW node.
 
 echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/vzbr0/forwarding
 
 cause no problem.
 
 Well - returning to point marked as **MARK**.
 
 Route table on HW node:
 
  staj-dev:~# route -6
  Kernel IPv6 routing table
  Destination Next Hop
  Flags Metric RefUse Iface
  ::1/128 ::  
  U 0  61 lo  
  2001:718:1:e::23:3004/128   ::  
  U 0  788   1 lo  
  2001:718:1:e::23:3012/128   ::  
  U 1024   00 vzbr0   
  2001:718:1:e::/64   ::  
  U 256169   0 eth0
  fe80::/128  ::  
  U 0  02 lo  
  fe80::1/128 ::  
  U 0  01 lo  
  fe80::20c:29ff:fe63:a674/128::  
  U 0  01 lo  
  fe80::20c:29ff:fe63:a674/128::  
  U 0  01 lo  
  fe80::213:72ff:fe1b:b97/128 ::  
  U 0  32   1 lo  
  fe80::/64   ::  
  U 25600 eth0
  fe80::/64   ::  
  U 25600 venet0  
  fe80::/64   ::  
  U 25600 veth012.0
  fe80::/64   ::  
  U 25600 vzbr0   
  f020::1/128 ff02::1 
  UC0  165   0 eth0
  ff00::/8::  
  U 25600 eth0
  ff00::/8::  
  U 25600 venet0  
  ff00::/8::  
  U 25600 veth012.0
  ff00::/8::  
  U 25600 vzbr0   
  ::/0fe80::215:faff:fe87:3100
  UGDA  1024   167   0 eth0
 
 Route table on VE node:
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# route -6
  Kernel IPv6 routing table
  Destination Next Hop
  Flags Metric RefUse Iface
  ::1/128 ::  
  U 0  11 lo  
  2001:718:1:e::23:3012/128   ::  
  U 0  53   1 lo  
  2001:718:1:e::/64   ::  
  U 25600 eth0
  fe80::20c:29ff:fe63:a673/128::  
  U 0  01 lo  
  fe80::/64

Re: [Users] IPv6 again but this time with veth

2007-06-29 Thread Vitaliy Gusev
Possible it is a bug in vzctl's configuration script. Which OS do you use for 
VE/Host? What is vzctl version?

On the Friday 29 June 2007 12:53 Jan Tomasek, wrote:
 Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
  venet device works with IPv6!
  Describe steps which you did for venet device. 
 
 I created VE 233005:
   IPv4=195.113.233.5
   IPv6=2001:718:1:e::23:3005
 
 IPv4 is working ok.
 
 When I try to add IPv6 I get:
 
 staj-dev:~# vzctl set 233005 --ipadd '2001:718:1:e::23:3005' --save
 Adding IP address(es): 2001:718:1:e::23:3005
 Failed to bring up venet0:1.
 Configure meminfo: 49152
 Saved parameters for VE 233005
 
  staj-dev:~# vzctl enter 233005
  entered into VE 233005
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# ifconfig -a
  loLink encap:Local Loopback  
inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
  
  venet0Link encap:UNSPEC  HWaddr 
  00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00  
inet addr:127.0.0.1  P-t-P:127.0.0.1  Bcast:0.0.0.0  
  Mask:255.255.255.255
UP BROADCAST POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP  MTU:1500  Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
  
  venet0:0  Link encap:UNSPEC  HWaddr 
  00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00  
inet addr:195.113.233.5  P-t-P:195.113.233.5  Bcast:0.0.0.0  
  Mask:255.255.255.255
UP BROADCAST POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP  MTU:1500  Metric:1
 
 There is no venet0:1 inside  of VE 233005.
 

-- 

Vitaliy Gusev,

___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6 again but this time with veth

2007-06-29 Thread Jan Tomasek

Vitaliy Gusev wrote:

Possible it is a bug in vzctl's configuration script. Which OS do you
use for VE/Host? What is vzctl version?


Both systems are Debian etch.

staj-dev:~# vzctl --version
vzctl version 3.0.16-5dso1

--
---
Jan Tomasek aka Semik
http://www.tomasek.cz/
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6 again but this time with veth

2007-06-29 Thread Jan Tomasek

Vitaliy Gusev wrote:

You added veth012.0 device  to the bridge br0.  How about eth0 ?



It wasn't there. After adding it I finally could yell IT WORSK! but 
just for while. :( In few minutes it stopped working on IPv4 (v6 is 
still fine). I discovered that problem is in arp (my GW is .233.1):



staj-dev:~# arp -n
Address  HWtype  HWaddress   Flags MaskIface
195.113.233.224  (incomplete)  eth0
195.113.233.12   ether   00:0C:29:63:A6:73   C vzbr0
195.113.233.254  (incomplete)  eth0
195.113.233.92   (incomplete)  eth0
195.113.233.193  (incomplete)  eth0
195.113.233.99   ether   00:0C:29:6D:67:1A   C vzbr0
195.113.233.99   (incomplete)  eth0
195.113.233.36   (incomplete)  eth0
195.113.233.254  ether   00:13:72:39:61:AA   C vzbr0
195.113.233.2(incomplete)  eth0
195.113.233.1(incomplete)  eth0
195.113.233.245  (incomplete)  eth0
195.113.233.246  (incomplete)  eth0


staj-dev:~# arp -s 195.113.233.1 00:15:FA:87:31:0


Address  HWtype  HWaddress   Flags MaskIface
195.113.233.91   (incomplete)  eth0
195.113.233.246  (incomplete)  eth0
195.113.233.34   (incomplete)  eth0
195.113.233.12   ether   00:0C:29:63:A6:73   C vzbr0
195.113.233.74   (incomplete)  eth0
195.113.233.1ether   00:15:FA:87:31:00   CMeth0


fixes problem. But that is really ugly hack, this way I have to add 
static arp records for every host in network 195.113.233.0/24 outside of 
this HW node. That is not good way.


Any idea why ARP (and IPv4) stop work? Command I do execute are:

brctl addbr vzbr0
ifconfig vzbr0 0
echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/vzbr0/forwarding
echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/vzbr0/proxy_arp
brctl addif vzbr0 veth012.0
brctl addif vzbr0 eth0
ip route add 195.113.233.12 dev vzbr0

--
---
Jan Tomasek aka Semik
http://www.tomasek.cz/
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6 again but this time with veth

2007-06-28 Thread Jan Tomasek

Vitaliy Gusev wrote:

Hello, do you use a bridge?


Probably not... if there is some place where I should RTFM, than just 
provide me URL please ;) I was hoping setup will be similar as is for 
IPv4. IPv6 itself is new for me, and with combination with OpenVZ quite 
 hard to understand


How  I see staj-dev is a host-node, 


Yes.


but what is two others hosts semik,


that is just IPv4 capable box, used for demonstration that my veth012.0 
interface is at least able to communicate on IPv4.


 ip6v2-test?

That is VE 233012 where I'm trying to get IPv6 working.


What steps did you do for veth012.0 ?


staj-dev# vzctl set 233012 --netif_add 
eth0,00:0C:29:63:A6:73,veth012.0,00:0C:29:63:A6:74 --save



  staj-dev:~# ifconfig  veth012.0 0
  staj-dev:~# echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/veth012.0/forwarding
  staj-dev:~# echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/veth012.0/proxy_arp
  staj-dev:~# echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/forwarding
  staj-dev:~# echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/proxy_arp
  staj-dev:~# ip route add 195.113.233.012 dev veth012.0

  staj-dev:~# echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/veth012.0/forwarding
  staj-dev:~# echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/eth0/forwarding
  staj-dev:~# echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/forwarding


Am I now more clear? Thanks for help.

--
---
Jan Tomasek aka Semik
http://www.tomasek.cz/
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] IPv6 again but this time with veth

2007-06-27 Thread Jan Tomasek

Hello,

few weeks ago I was trying to setup IPv6, but that doesn't work.
http://forum.openvz.org/index.php?t=msggoto=12809srch=IPv6#msg_12809

I would really like to have this feature. So I'm trying to experiment 
with veth devices, but not much success again :(


My host node has IPv6 support:

staj-dev:~# ifconfig 
eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:13:72:1B:0B:97  
  inet addr:195.113.233.4  Bcast:195.113.233.255  Mask:255.255.255.0

  inet6 addr: 2001:718:1:e::23:3004/64 Scope:Global
  inet6 addr: fe80::213:72ff:fe1b:b97/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:2136 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:1304 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
  RX bytes:211656 (206.6 KiB)  TX bytes:138480 (135.2 KiB)
  Interrupt:17 


It is accessible on IPv6:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping6 -c1 2001:718:1:e::23:3004
 PING 2001:718:1:e::23:3004(2001:718:1:e::23:3004) 56 data bytes
 64 bytes from 2001:718:1:e::23:3004: icmp_seq=0 ttl=63 time=0.129 ms

I setup IPv4 part this way:

 staj-dev:~# ifconfig veth012.0 0
 staj-dev:~# echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/veth012.0/forwarding
 staj-dev:~# echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/veth012.0/proxy_arp
 staj-dev:~# echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/forwarding
 staj-dev:~# echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/proxy_arp
 staj-dev:~# ip route add 195.113.233.012 dev veth012.0

and it works:

 semik:~$ping -c1 195.113.233.12
 PING 195.113.233.12 (195.113.233.12): 56 data bytes
 64 bytes from 195.113.233.12: icmp_seq=0 ttl=61 time=0.252 ms

I'm trying to follow 
http://wiki.openvz.org/Virtual_Ethernet_device#Virtual_ethernet_device_with_IPv6


but after executing (2nd, 3rd) lines

 staj-dev:~# echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/veth012.0/forwarding
 staj-dev:~# echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/eth0/forwarding
 staj-dev:~# echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/forwarding

host node stop responding to ping6. I'm stuck here... I also do not want 
run router advertisement daemon (if that is possible). My VE should have 
address 2001:718:1:e::23:3012.


Inside VE I setup:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ifconfig 
eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0C:29:63:A6:73  
  inet addr:195.113.233.12  Bcast:195.113.233.255  Mask:255.255.255.0

  inet6 addr: 2001:718:1:e::23:3012/64 Scope:Global
  inet6 addr: fe80::20c:29ff:fe63:a673/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:88 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:88 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
  RX bytes:7012 (6.8 KiB)  TX bytes:6948 (6.7 KiB)




[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /etc/network/interfaces 
auto lo

iface lo inet loopback

auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 195.113.233.12
netmask 255.255.255.0
network 195.113.233.0
broadcast 195.113.233.255
gateway 195.113.233.4
dns-nameservers 195.113.144.233 195.113.144.194
dns-search cesnet.cz


eth0 inet6 static
iface eth0 inet6 static
address 2001:718:1:e::23:3012
netmask 64


veth interface is configured this way:


NETIF=ifname=eth0,mac=00:0C:29:63:A6:73,host_ifname=veth012.0,host_mac=00:0C:29:63:A6:74


inside VE I see reasonable routes:


[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# route -6
Kernel IPv6 routing table
Destination Next Hop
Flags Metric RefUse Iface
::1/128 ::  U 0  11 lo  
2001:718:1:e::23:3004/128   2001:718:1:e::23:3004   UC0  49   0 eth0
2001:718:1:e::23:3012/128   ::  U 0  142   1 lo  
2001:718:1:e::/64   ::  U 25600 eth0
fe80::20c:29ff:fe63:a673/128::  U 0  01 lo  
fe80::/64   ::  U 25600 eth0
ff02::16/128ff02::16UC0  50 eth0
ff00::/8::  U 25600 eth0


but I'm not able even to ping to my host:


[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ping6 2001:718:1:e::23:3004
PING 2001:718:1:e::23:3004(2001:718:1:e::23:3004) 56 data bytes
From 2001:718:1:e::23:3012 icmp_seq=1 Destination unreachable: Address 
unreachable


it is very interesting, that host node see my ping requests:


staj-dev:~# tcpdump -i veth012.0
tcpdump: WARNING: veth012.0: no IPv4 address assigned
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on 

Re: [Users] IPv6 support in VE

2007-05-17 Thread Thorsten Schifferdecker

Hi,

adding is ok, but when i want delete a IPv6 with --ipdel, it shows:

# vzctl set VEID --ipdel fc00::1 [--save]
Warning: ipv6 support disabled ---*
Deleting IP address(es):
Configure meminfo: 49152
Saved parameters for VE VEID

Regards,
Thorsten


Jan,

With venet, you use the same ipadd command, for example:

vzctl set VEID --ipadd fc00::01 --save

Before that, make sure that
* your kernel is compiled with IPv6
* ipv6 module is loaded (if IPv6 is compiled as a module)
* IPV6 set to yes in /etc/vz/vz.conf

Kirill Korotaev wrote:

Jan,

venet supports IPv6 addresses as well.
it's just an article concerning veth only :)

Thanks,
Kirill

Jan Tomasek wrote:
 

Hello,

what is state of IPv6 support inside VE? I found:

http://wiki.openvz.org/Virtual_Ethernet_device#Virtual_ethernet_device_with_IPv6 



but that looks quite complicated comparing to IPv4 where I just need to
use `vzctl --ipadd 1.2.3.4` and that is all.

Do I have to go with veth or is there chance how to configure IPv6 on 
venet?


Thanks for sugestions




___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users



___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
  


___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] IPv6 support in VE

2007-05-11 Thread Kir Kolyshkin

Jan,

With venet, you use the same ipadd command, for example:

vzctl set VEID --ipadd fc00::01 --save

Before that, make sure that
* your kernel is compiled with IPv6
* ipv6 module is loaded (if IPv6 is compiled as a module)
* IPV6 set to yes in /etc/vz/vz.conf

Kirill Korotaev wrote:

Jan,

venet supports IPv6 addresses as well.
it's just an article concerning veth only :)

Thanks,
Kirill

Jan Tomasek wrote:
  

Hello,

what is state of IPv6 support inside VE? I found:

http://wiki.openvz.org/Virtual_Ethernet_device#Virtual_ethernet_device_with_IPv6

but that looks quite complicated comparing to IPv4 where I just need to
use `vzctl --ipadd 1.2.3.4` and that is all.

Do I have to go with veth or is there chance how to configure IPv6 on venet?

Thanks for sugestions




___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users



___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
  


___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users