[ovirt-users] Urgent: not comply with the cluster Default emulated machines
Hi guys, Please could someone assist urgently, 2 of my 3 hosts are non operational and some VM's won't start because I don't have resources to run them all on one host. I upgraded to 3.4 from 3.3 yesterday and everything seemed fine, then woke up this morning to this problem... host node03 does not comply with the cluster Default emulated machines. The Hosts emulated machines are rhel6.4.0,pc Hosts CentOS release 6.5 (Final) vdsm-python-4.14.11.2-0.el6.x86_64 vdsm-cli-4.14.11.2-0.el6.noarch vdsm-python-zombiereaper-4.14.11.2-0.el6.noarch vdsm-xmlrpc-4.14.11.2-0.el6.noarch vdsm-4.14.11.2-0.el6.x86_64 qemu-kvm-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.355.el6.3.x86_64 qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.10.x86_64 qemu-kvm-rhev-tools-0.12.1.2-2.295.el6.8.x86_64 Engine: ovirt-engine-sdk-python-3.4.0.7-1.el6.noarch ovirt-release34-1.0.2-1.noarch ovirt-engine-dbscripts-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-release-el6-9-1.noarch ovirt-iso-uploader-3.4.0-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-lib-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-backend-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-websocket-proxy-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-userportal-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-base-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-host-deploy-java-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-cli-3.3.0.6-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-restapi-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-ovirt-engine-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-image-uploader-3.4.0-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-tools-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-websocket-proxy-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-host-deploy-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch ovirt-log-collector-3.4.1-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-ovirt-engine-common-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch I set my cluster compatibility to 3.4 after the upgrade as well. Thank you! Regards. Neil Wilson. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Urgent: not comply with the cluster Default emulated machines
On 08/07/2014 09:10 AM, Neil wrote: let see what qemu output as its supported emulated machines on your non-operational host: /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -M ? if rhel6.4 is there than vdsm still caches old values probably verify with vdsClient 0 -s getVdsCaps | grep rhel Hi guys, Please could someone assist urgently, 2 of my 3 hosts are non operational and some VM's won't start because I don't have resources to run them all on one host. I upgraded to 3.4 from 3.3 yesterday and everything seemed fine, then woke up this morning to this problem... host node03 does not comply with the cluster Default emulated machines. The Hosts emulated machines are rhel6.4.0,pc Hosts CentOS release 6.5 (Final) vdsm-python-4.14.11.2-0.el6.x86_64 vdsm-cli-4.14.11.2-0.el6.noarch vdsm-python-zombiereaper-4.14.11.2-0.el6.noarch vdsm-xmlrpc-4.14.11.2-0.el6.noarch vdsm-4.14.11.2-0.el6.x86_64 qemu-kvm-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.355.el6.3.x86_64 qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.10.x86_64 qemu-kvm-rhev-tools-0.12.1.2-2.295.el6.8.x86_64 Engine: ovirt-engine-sdk-python-3.4.0.7-1.el6.noarch ovirt-release34-1.0.2-1.noarch ovirt-engine-dbscripts-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-release-el6-9-1.noarch ovirt-iso-uploader-3.4.0-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-lib-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-backend-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-websocket-proxy-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-userportal-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-base-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-host-deploy-java-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-cli-3.3.0.6-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-restapi-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-ovirt-engine-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-image-uploader-3.4.0-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-tools-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-websocket-proxy-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-host-deploy-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch ovirt-log-collector-3.4.1-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-ovirt-engine-common-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch I set my cluster compatibility to 3.4 after the upgrade as well. Thank you! Regards. Neil Wilson. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Urgent: not comply with the cluster Default emulated machines
Hi Roy, Thank you very much for replying so quickly. I think I've managed to work out what is causing it. During the updates it looks like one of my hosts ended up with qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.10.x86_64, which is the one that was working, and the other two hosts ended up with qemu-kvm-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.355.el6.3.x86_64 I've since removed 2.355 and re-installed node03 with 2.415 and it's now operational again. Thank you very much for your assistance. Greatly appreciated. Kind regards. Neil Wilson. On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Roy Golan rgo...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/07/2014 09:10 AM, Neil wrote: let see what qemu output as its supported emulated machines on your non-operational host: /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -M ? if rhel6.4 is there than vdsm still caches old values probably verify with vdsClient 0 -s getVdsCaps | grep rhel Hi guys, Please could someone assist urgently, 2 of my 3 hosts are non operational and some VM's won't start because I don't have resources to run them all on one host. I upgraded to 3.4 from 3.3 yesterday and everything seemed fine, then woke up this morning to this problem... host node03 does not comply with the cluster Default emulated machines. The Hosts emulated machines are rhel6.4.0,pc Hosts CentOS release 6.5 (Final) vdsm-python-4.14.11.2-0.el6.x86_64 vdsm-cli-4.14.11.2-0.el6.noarch vdsm-python-zombiereaper-4.14.11.2-0.el6.noarch vdsm-xmlrpc-4.14.11.2-0.el6.noarch vdsm-4.14.11.2-0.el6.x86_64 qemu-kvm-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.355.el6.3.x86_64 qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.10.x86_64 qemu-kvm-rhev-tools-0.12.1.2-2.295.el6.8.x86_64 Engine: ovirt-engine-sdk-python-3.4.0.7-1.el6.noarch ovirt-release34-1.0.2-1.noarch ovirt-engine-dbscripts-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-release-el6-9-1.noarch ovirt-iso-uploader-3.4.0-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-lib-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-backend-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-websocket-proxy-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-userportal-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-base-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-host-deploy-java-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-cli-3.3.0.6-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-restapi-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-ovirt-engine-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-image-uploader-3.4.0-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-tools-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-websocket-proxy-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-host-deploy-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch ovirt-log-collector-3.4.1-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-ovirt-engine-common-3.4.3-1.el6.noarch I set my cluster compatibility to 3.4 after the upgrade as well. Thank you! Regards. Neil Wilson. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Kernel panic for live images
On 6-8-2014 14:59, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: Il 03/08/2014 22:45, Jaco ha scritto: I've (tentatively) confirmed this as an issue with the CentOS IRC channel - that images need to be dd'd not written with tools, meaning that this portion of the wiki is irrelevant: http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_Live#USB Can you please update the wiki? Hi Jaco, I updated the wiki for you :-) Joop ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] New member and first question...
Hello, I'm French, I work for the French administration and this is my first message on this list... At the moment, we use VMware (vSphere 5.1/5.5, cloud edition) for our virtualized complex infrastructures. I've discovered recently that oVirt offers enhanced features, closed to the ones of VMware. Is the product sufficiently advanced yet ? I don't know and I hope you'll be able to help me ;-) My first question is about hypervisor... In VMware infrastructures, we use a microkernel since the version 4 (before, it was an hypervisor based on a RedHat core). On the oVirt site, I can download ovirt-engine to install it over Debian/RedHat/CentOS, etc... But it seems to be less optimised because some ressources are used by the underlying OS... Can you explain me differences between this technology and the VMware one ? Thank you. David. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] User Portal Open in Full Screen
On Aug 6, 2014, at 20:09 , Sigbjorn Lie sigbj...@nixtra.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 13:37 +0200, Michal Skrivanek wrote: On Jul 28, 2014, at 12:33 , Sigbjorn Lie sigbj...@nixtra.com wrote: Hi, In version 3.3 the Open in Full Screen under Spice Console Options in the User Portal was not enabled by default. In version 3.4 the Open in Full Screen is now enabled by default. Is it possible to manage the default behaviour of this setting? I would like it *not* to be enabled by default. Not yet. It's fixed in 3.4 to match the previous 3.3 behavior I wonder at what level such an option should be. We can make it global..but currently we have a different behavior in webadminpower user portal vs user portal. Per user global might make sense too thoughts? What is the difference between the power user portal and the user portal with regards to the default of Open in Full Screen? well, basic UP has full screen by default, power user portal and webadmin not a global setting for each portal may be ok indeed A global setting configured by ovirt-config/rhevm-config for the User Portal would be fine. Regards, Siggi ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] User Portal 'Open in Full Screen'
On Thu, August 7, 2014 10:27, Michal Skrivanek wrote: On Aug 6, 2014, at 20:09 , Sigbjorn Lie sigbj...@nixtra.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 13:37 +0200, Michal Skrivanek wrote: On Jul 28, 2014, at 12:33 , Sigbjorn Lie sigbj...@nixtra.com wrote: Hi, In version 3.3 the Open in Full Screen under Spice Console Options in the User Portal was not enabled by default. In version 3.4 the Open in Full Screen is now enabled by default. Is it possible to manage the default behaviour of this setting? I would like it *not* to be enabled by default. Not yet. It's fixed in 3.4 to match the previous 3.3 behavior I wonder at what level such an option should be. We can make it global..but currently we have a different behavior in webadminpower user portal vs user portal. Per user global might make sense too thoughts? What is the difference between the power user portal and the user portal with regards to the default of Open in Full Screen? well, basic UP has full screen by default, power user portal and webadmin not a global setting for each portal may be ok indeed Ok. Where is this actual setting set today? Is there any way that I can change a parameter i the database or a parameter in a file manually to change the full screen setting for the UP? Regards, Siggi A global setting configured by ovirt-config/rhevm-config for the User Portal would be fine. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] New member and first question...
On 08/07/2014 09:45 AM, David BERCOT wrote: Hello, I'm French, I work for the French administration and this is my first message on this list... At the moment, we use VMware (vSphere 5.1/5.5, cloud edition) for our virtualized complex infrastructures. I've discovered recently that oVirt offers enhanced features, closed to the ones of VMware. Is the product sufficiently advanced yet ? I don't know and I hope you'll be able to help me ;-) Welcome David, We find it sufficiently advanced, since 3.5 is nearing release most of our wishlist has been taken care off ;-) Check out the case stories like (http://www.ovirt.org/Brussels_Airport_Case_Study) My first question is about hypervisor... In VMware infrastructures, we use a microkernel since the version 4 (before, it was an hypervisor based on a RedHat core). On the oVirt site, I can download ovirt-engine to install it over Debian/RedHat/CentOS, etc... But it seems to be less optimised because some ressources are used by the underlying OS... Ovirt engine is the management part (like vCenter), there is no need for it to be that optimized as it's not running VM's itself. What you're talking about is ovirt node: http://www.ovirt.org/Node Can you explain me differences between this technology and the VMware one ? A bit outdated: http://www.siliconloons.com/open-source-cloud-and-virtualization-terminology-for-vmware-users/ Some more reading: Virtual data center management with oVirt 3.4 http://lwn.net/Articles/600370/ Thank you. David. ___ That's my 2c. Kind regards, Jorick Astrego Netbulae B.V. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] New member and first question...
Le Thu, 07 Aug 2014 10:56:35 +0200, Jorick Astrego j.astr...@netbulae.eu a écrit : On 08/07/2014 09:45 AM, David BERCOT wrote: Hello, I'm French, I work for the French administration and this is my first message on this list... At the moment, we use VMware (vSphere 5.1/5.5, cloud edition) for our virtualized complex infrastructures. I've discovered recently that oVirt offers enhanced features, closed to the ones of VMware. Is the product sufficiently advanced yet ? I don't know and I hope you'll be able to help me ;-) Welcome David, Thank you ;-) We find it sufficiently advanced, since 3.5 is nearing release most of our wishlist has been taken care off ;-) Check out the case stories like (http://www.ovirt.org/Brussels_Airport_Case_Study) Yes, it is an interesting article even if I did not understand the Openstack point because, if I'm not wrong, Openstack can run over any virtualization solution, VMware, KVM, etc... My first question is about hypervisor... In VMware infrastructures, we use a microkernel since the version 4 (before, it was an hypervisor based on a RedHat core). On the oVirt site, I can download ovirt-engine to install it over Debian/RedHat/CentOS, etc... But it seems to be less optimised because some ressources are used by the underlying OS... Ovirt engine is the management part (like vCenter), there is no need for it to be that optimized as it's not running VM's itself. Yes, I saw my mistake between oVirt engine and oVirt node ;-) My really question was : is it a good idea to run the oVirt node over another OS ? It would be more performant to run the oVirt node directly over the hardware, like ESXi... May be it is in the roadmap ? And I have another question : is there something like VMFS to store the VM in the SAN ? It's more performant to use FC than NFS shares... Thank you. David. What you're talking about is ovirt node: http://www.ovirt.org/Node Can you explain me differences between this technology and the VMware one ? A bit outdated: http://www.siliconloons.com/open-source-cloud-and-virtualization-terminology-for-vmware-users/ Some more reading: Virtual data center management with oVirt 3.4 http://lwn.net/Articles/600370/ Thank you. David. ___ That's my 2c. Kind regards, Jorick Astrego Netbulae B.V. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] setting hostname using payload
Hi all, I am using rhev 3.4 also created template which has cloud init installed. i want set hostname to vm using vm payload method how will i dodat also tell me the sample vm payload file ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] EL7 support
Hi, Is there any roadmap for supporting ovirt-engine on centos 7 ? Thanks Lokesh ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] UI Plugin: shellinabox did not work in ovirt-3.4.3
- Original Message - From: lofyer lof...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 8:07:48 PM I've changed that, but nothing happend. there's a good chance that you need to restart the engine in order for the change to take effect. did you do that? 在 14-8-7 上午12:51, Kanagaraj Mayilsamy 写道: the url should be plugin/ShellInABoxPlugin/start.html in shellinabox.json Thanks, Kanagaraj - Original Message - From: Einav Cohen eco...@redhat.com To: lofyer lof...@gmail.com, Daniel Erez de...@redhat.com Cc: users users@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 9:32:57 PM Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] UI Plugin: shellinabox did not work in ovirt-3.4.3 the URL structure has changed from 3.3 to 3.4; maybe the problem is in the URL within the UI Plugin json file? url: /webadmin/webadmin/plugin/ShellBoxPlugin/start.html (I copied it from [1], not sure what exists in the repo) maybe @Daniel would know better. [1] http://derezvir.blogspot.co.il/2013/01/ovirt-webadmin-shellinabox-ui-plugin.html - Original Message - From: lofyer lof...@gmail.com To: users users@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 10:45:35 AM Subject: [ovirt-users] UI Plugin: shellinabox did not work in ovirt-3.4.3 My OS is CentOS-6.5. I'd cloned samples from gerrit, but it did not work as it used to be. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] New member and first question...
FYI: actually the vmware kernel leverages many open source drivers from the linux kernel and I highly suspect that it is in fact a custom linux kernel. some evidence that supports this view is the recent attempt of vmware to join the linux-distros mailinglist to get early access to vulnerabilities in open source code. you can just join this list if you offer a kind of linux distribution (or something very close to it). here is a thread for further reading on the case: http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q2/403 PS: regarding ovirt-node: it's actually a very trimmed down linux system, just enough to act as an hypervisor, so it's bare metal virtualization (I would even argue that there is no such thing as a type 1 hypervisor, because if you talk about type 1 hypervisors the hypervisor itself is the operating system kernel, which is also the case for kvm, as it is a linux kernel module). HTH Am 07.08.2014 14:03, schrieb Gianluca Cecchi: VMware says esxi is a bare-metal hypervisor and there is not an underlying os. Someone else says it is based on vmkernel operating system ( where vmkernel is defined as a posix-like operating system). In my opinion the oVirt node is to be intended something like ESXi: an os with the smallest possible footprint, dedicated to run as a KVM hypervisor. The difference being that it is based on Linux and not developed from scratch. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt June/July 2014 Updates
- Original Message - From: Sven Kieske svenkie...@gmail.com To: users@ovirt.org Cc: knese...@redhat.com Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2014 7:45:27 PM Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt June/July 2014 Updates -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04.08.2014 21:43, Brian Proffitt wrote: * Kiril Nesenko educated Jenkins User Conference attendees on how to manage oVirt infrastructure with Jenkins http://lanyrd.com/2014/jenkinsconf-israel/sdbqzc/ Any chance to get some slides/video of the talk? http://slides.com/kirilnesenko/jenkins_conference_2014#/ thanks Sven -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJT4QonAAoJEAq0kGAWDrqlq0EL/1m8VmjDnNR4Jk43yVi/bJ0M aXZZSNHasnG1+fTEzLAh+lpGZVLmBrd4tcdqSwEr2s3MLZ/m775N0tbPQtRNEVaz /CBUJuG09zJZDVCEkxpdNPqVxIgNY1ZxrZtlXl0tvY58wsr9ed0jbQAqwGf6npaX Apqej9CuPushdkMZt8qVO/J8I24w3Qsj91fW7s25wJ1XKA43dA+oc+j/HI+fiCeM LVucw3uySN8FjG7fARsA8/0dTwyBYwcHaBBlhk6UpYN4wgD6hfCR44zkojXrJeZ2 KQpvGg67f+ZPq5iZRIohMkKhjuGBTCRHtn5HcOvEZXdGivjnGmiij2T+Lggk+Bem MtcopRt30jgWgDFcansrISCCTV1GAKF9QibuTinuQLS8+MywkzuU9vDv667ZC7hf hHvwV2zn6Z+9H2vLpcfUNZGqs9BYqf7PV1SL0zo9M/i2HRUM8rqWpHTYd/9sJck9 Wui0Gu21fj38rFsWMAvTsHKhxCcn5JQgqF6/GVNqpg== =nrB1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] New oVirt Node ISO for oVirt 3.5 available for testing
Hey, there is a new oVirt Node ISO available for testing: http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5-pre/iso/ovirt-node-iso-3.5.0.ovirt35.20140805.0.el6.iso The low-light is that the ISO contains the important bits for hosted engine on Node - but sadly it is affected by a bug, which prevents further testing. In general Node is slowly converging to a more stable state. Feel free to test and provide us with feedback via the usual channels over irc and mailinglists, as well as bugzilla. Greetings fabian ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] UI Plugin: shellinabox did not work in ovirt-3.4.3
Yes, I did that. 在 14-8-7 下午7:37, Einav Cohen 写道: - Original Message - From: lofyer lof...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 8:07:48 PM I've changed that, but nothing happend. there's a good chance that you need to restart the engine in order for the change to take effect. did you do that? 在 14-8-7 上午12:51, Kanagaraj Mayilsamy 写道: the url should be plugin/ShellInABoxPlugin/start.html in shellinabox.json Thanks, Kanagaraj - Original Message - From: Einav Cohen eco...@redhat.com To: lofyer lof...@gmail.com, Daniel Erez de...@redhat.com Cc: users users@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 9:32:57 PM Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] UI Plugin: shellinabox did not work in ovirt-3.4.3 the URL structure has changed from 3.3 to 3.4; maybe the problem is in the URL within the UI Plugin json file? url: /webadmin/webadmin/plugin/ShellBoxPlugin/start.html (I copied it from [1], not sure what exists in the repo) maybe @Daniel would know better. [1] http://derezvir.blogspot.co.il/2013/01/ovirt-webadmin-shellinabox-ui-plugin.html - Original Message - From: lofyer lof...@gmail.com To: users users@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 10:45:35 AM Subject: [ovirt-users] UI Plugin: shellinabox did not work in ovirt-3.4.3 My OS is CentOS-6.5. I'd cloned samples from gerrit, but it did not work as it used to be. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] New member and first question...
Le Thu, 7 Aug 2014 14:03:15 +0200, Gianluca Cecchi gianluca.cec...@gmail.com a écrit : Il 07/ago/2014 11:44 David BERCOT ovirt ov...@bercot.org@ ov...@bercot.orgbercot.org ov...@bercot.org ha scritto: My really question was : is it a good idea to run the oVirt node over another OS ? It would be more performant to run the oVirt node directly over the hardware, like ESXi... May be it is in the roadmap ? VMware says esxi is a bare-metal hypervisor and there is not an underlying os. Someone else says it is based on vmkernel operating system ( where vmkernel is defined as a posix-like operating system). In my opinion the oVirt node is to be intended something like ESXi: an os with the smallest possible footprint, dedicated to run as a KVM hypervisor. The difference being that it is based on Linux and not developed from scratch. It is OK for me to have an oVirt node similar to ESXi, except that it is based on Linux. But on the oVirt site, I've found oVirt node packages to install over RH, Fedora, Debian, CentOS, etc... Is there a dedicated oVirt-node ISO, based on the Linux kernel, but optimized for KVM, without other kernel modules we can see on RH, Fedora, Debian, CentOS, etc... ? Thank you. David. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] User Portal 'Open in Full Screen'
On Aug 7, 2014, at 10:35 , Sigbjorn Lie sigbj...@nixtra.com wrote: On Thu, August 7, 2014 10:27, Michal Skrivanek wrote: On Aug 6, 2014, at 20:09 , Sigbjorn Lie sigbj...@nixtra.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 13:37 +0200, Michal Skrivanek wrote: On Jul 28, 2014, at 12:33 , Sigbjorn Lie sigbj...@nixtra.com wrote: Hi, In version 3.3 the Open in Full Screen under Spice Console Options in the User Portal was not enabled by default. In version 3.4 the Open in Full Screen is now enabled by default. Is it possible to manage the default behaviour of this setting? I would like it *not* to be enabled by default. Not yet. It's fixed in 3.4 to match the previous 3.3 behavior I wonder at what level such an option should be. We can make it global..but currently we have a different behavior in webadminpower user portal vs user portal. Per user global might make sense too thoughts? What is the difference between the power user portal and the user portal with regards to the default of Open in Full Screen? well, basic UP has full screen by default, power user portal and webadmin not a global setting for each portal may be ok indeed Ok. Where is this actual setting set today? Is there any way that I can change a parameter i the database or a parameter in a file manually to change the full screen setting for the UP? no, it's hardcoded at the moment if you use .vv files you can add some wrapper to get rid of e.g. fullscreen for all cases (just filter out the parameter) or something like that… Thanks, michal Regards, Siggi A global setting configured by ovirt-config/rhevm-config for the User Portal would be fine. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] New member and first question...
Le Thu, 7 Aug 2014 12:16:34 +, Sven Kieske s.kie...@mittwald.de a écrit : FYI: actually the vmware kernel leverages many open source drivers from the linux kernel and I highly suspect that it is in fact a custom linux kernel. some evidence that supports this view is the recent attempt of vmware to join the linux-distros mailinglist to get early access to vulnerabilities in open source code. you can just join this list if you offer a kind of linux distribution (or something very close to it). here is a thread for further reading on the case: http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q2/403 PS: regarding ovirt-node: it's actually a very trimmed down linux system, just enough to act as an hypervisor, so it's bare metal virtualization (I would even argue that there is no such thing as a type 1 hypervisor, because if you talk about type 1 hypervisors the hypervisor itself is the operating system kernel, which is also the case for kvm, as it is a linux kernel module). If I understand well, oVirt-node is very very close to ESXi (which is good news ;-)). But to have such a bare metal virtualization, we have not to install a complete OS (like RH, Fedora, Debian, etc...) and then to add oVirt-node packages ??? It should be a very light kernel with only oVirt-node (KVM ?) modules/packages, no ? There is only this part I do not understand !?!? Thank you. David. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] New member and first question...
I don't actually use it myself so take my information with a grain of salt, as it might not be 100% accurate. afaik this is the current stable ovirt-node iso: http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/3.4/iso/ovirt-node-iso-3.4-20140423.0.el6.iso it comes in 2 flavors: el6 based and fedora based. so it's actually a trimmed down el6/fedora version I cc'ed fabian who can give more information on the case, because he is the maintainer of the node project (i hope this is still correct). HTH Am 07.08.2014 14:48, schrieb David BERCOT: Is there a dedicated oVirt-node ISO, based on the Linux kernel, but optimized for KVM, without other kernel modules we can see on RH, Fedora, Debian, CentOS, etc... ? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] New member and first question...
Le Thu, 7 Aug 2014 12:55:40 +, Sven Kieske s.kie...@mittwald.de a écrit : I don't actually use it myself so take my information with a grain of salt, as it might not be 100% accurate. afaik this is the current stable ovirt-node iso: http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/3.4/iso/ovirt-node-iso-3.4-20140423.0.el6.iso it comes in 2 flavors: el6 based and fedora based. so it's actually a trimmed down el6/fedora version I cc'ed fabian who can give more information on the case, because he is the maintainer of the node project (i hope this is still correct). Ah, great !!! And is there a Debian flavor ? It is my favorite distribution ;-) Thank you. David. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] New member and first question...
Am 07.08.2014 15:10, schrieb David BERCOT: Ah, great !!! And is there a Debian flavor ? It is my favorite distribution ;-) Not yet, and I don't know if it is on the roadmap. you could maybe create your own, it's basically this workflow: install $distro throw out all unneeded stuff install virt stuff (libvirt+vdsm) apply hardening (selinux etc) create iso I go with centos minimal and customize that myself, works really well. I don't know if vdsm is already complete platform independent (afaik it should be). the initial development was all on fedora and el6, so this is where it runs best atm. but I know for sure there are plans to make it distribution agnostic, but I don't know if this includes a pre-created iso for ovirt-node based on debian or gentoo. maybe fabian can shed some light on the future plans. alon can maybe give some insight into how distribution agnostic ovirt already is and what future plans are, thus cc'ing them. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] New member and first question...
- Original Message - Am 07.08.2014 15:10, schrieb David BERCOT: Ah, great !!! And is there a Debian flavor ? No. Currently not. But Node became more stable over the last months, and you might want to try this snapshot build: http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5-pre/iso/ovirt-node-iso-3.5.0.ovirt35.20140805.0.el6.iso It is my favorite distribution ;-) Not yet, and I don't know if it is on the roadmap. you could maybe create your own, it's basically this workflow: install $distro throw out all unneeded stuff install virt stuff (libvirt+vdsm) apply hardening (selinux etc) create iso I go with centos minimal and customize that myself, works really well. I don't know if vdsm is already complete platform independent (afaik it should be). the initial development was all on fedora and el6, so this is where it runs best atm. but I know for sure there are plans to make it distribution agnostic, but I don't know if this includes a pre-created iso for ovirt-node based on debian or gentoo. maybe fabian can shed some light on the future plans. The current Node can really only be created for Fedora related distrios, so CentOS, RHEL and Fedora itself. The reason for this is that all parts the build process is tailored around Fedora related tools. Namely kickstarts, and lviecd-tools. We are currently thinking about how we can change Node and make it more friendly, the distro agnostic idea also goes into this thoughts - but there is nothing concrete on that front yet. That's it from the Node side. - fabian alon can maybe give some insight into how distribution agnostic ovirt already is and what future plans are, thus cc'ing them. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] New member and first question...
Le Thu, 7 Aug 2014 10:29:20 -0400 (EDT), Fabian Deutsch fdeut...@redhat.com a écrit : - Original Message - Am 07.08.2014 15:10, schrieb David BERCOT: Ah, great !!! And is there a Debian flavor ? No. Currently not. But Node became more stable over the last months, and you might want to try this snapshot build: http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5-pre/iso/ovirt-node-iso-3.5.0.ovirt35.20140805.0.el6.iso It is my favorite distribution ;-) Not yet, and I don't know if it is on the roadmap. you could maybe create your own, it's basically this workflow: install $distro throw out all unneeded stuff install virt stuff (libvirt+vdsm) apply hardening (selinux etc) create iso I go with centos minimal and customize that myself, works really well. I don't know if vdsm is already complete platform independent (afaik it should be). the initial development was all on fedora and el6, so this is where it runs best atm. but I know for sure there are plans to make it distribution agnostic, but I don't know if this includes a pre-created iso for ovirt-node based on debian or gentoo. maybe fabian can shed some light on the future plans. The current Node can really only be created for Fedora related distrios, so CentOS, RHEL and Fedora itself. The reason for this is that all parts the build process is tailored around Fedora related tools. Namely kickstarts, and lviecd-tools. We are currently thinking about how we can change Node and make it more friendly, the distro agnostic idea also goes into this thoughts - but there is nothing concrete on that front yet. That's it from the Node side. - fabian Thank you for all these answers. I'm going to test this soon and I'll tell you about the results... David. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] ovirt with 389 server inactive groups
I have ovirt engine running and connected to a 389 server with the memberof plugin enabled and working properly. I can add users and assign them to roles without any issues. when I look at a user I can see all the LDAP groups they are a member of. when I run engine-manage-domains -action=validate it tells me the domain is valid. here is my problem when I try to assign a role to an LDAP group it looks like it works but in the general tab when under the group it tells me the status is Inactive. dose any one know how to enable the group? ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] ovirt-ha notifications flood of ovirt-hosted-engine state transition GlobalMaintenance-GlobalMaintenance messages?
Why do the ha brokers send this message every 15 seconds? It isn’t really a state transition, and it’s a little excessive for a reminder that it’s in Global Maintenance. This is with centos 6.5 hosts. Any thing I can do on my side to get it to send just one for the initial transition into maintenance mode? -Darrell ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] New member and first question...
By the way David have you ever done a Red Hat kickstart with the nobase option. You get an OS install thats as stripped down as possible. you can even create a node for ovirt which is smaller than the ESXi install base last I checked. just be aware you will not have many of the tools you would normally expect to see for example bind-utils isn't installed so the box wont have nslookup or dig unless you install it. On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:44 AM, David BERCOT ov...@bercot.org wrote: Le Thu, 7 Aug 2014 10:29:20 -0400 (EDT), Fabian Deutsch fdeut...@redhat.com a écrit : - Original Message - Am 07.08.2014 15:10, schrieb David BERCOT: Ah, great !!! And is there a Debian flavor ? No. Currently not. But Node became more stable over the last months, and you might want to try this snapshot build: http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5-pre/iso/ovirt-node-iso-3.5.0.ovirt35.20140805.0.el6.iso It is my favorite distribution ;-) Not yet, and I don't know if it is on the roadmap. you could maybe create your own, it's basically this workflow: install $distro throw out all unneeded stuff install virt stuff (libvirt+vdsm) apply hardening (selinux etc) create iso I go with centos minimal and customize that myself, works really well. I don't know if vdsm is already complete platform independent (afaik it should be). the initial development was all on fedora and el6, so this is where it runs best atm. but I know for sure there are plans to make it distribution agnostic, but I don't know if this includes a pre-created iso for ovirt-node based on debian or gentoo. maybe fabian can shed some light on the future plans. The current Node can really only be created for Fedora related distrios, so CentOS, RHEL and Fedora itself. The reason for this is that all parts the build process is tailored around Fedora related tools. Namely kickstarts, and lviecd-tools. We are currently thinking about how we can change Node and make it more friendly, the distro agnostic idea also goes into this thoughts - but there is nothing concrete on that front yet. That's it from the Node side. - fabian Thank you for all these answers. I'm going to test this soon and I'll tell you about the results... David. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
