Re: spamd does not start
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 11:50 +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: Hi, /usr/local/bin/sa-update /usr/local/bin/sa-compile /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd restart the only time spamd would restart is if sa-update AND sa-compile were successfully completed, correct? Yes, that's correct. Sorry for jumping in the conversation... I have solved that issue by calling sa-update from a script (perl) and I do a spamassassin -lint before ever trying to restart spamd (or amavisd in my case), so I am sure that I will only restart on something clean. That way, I can also update some rules that are not on sa-update. I do something similar on my SA rules development system (I also have SA installed on this laptop but it is normally not running, which has the side effect of disabling the standard Fedora sa-update cron job because this won't run sa-update if it can't find the spamd daemon). My more complex equivalent is a bash script rather than Perl which starts and stops SA after a successful update in order to check that all is in order. This is it. I think the use of the case...esac construct makes it easier to read: === #!/bin/bash # # Update the Spamassassin rules # sau=/usr/bin/sa-update if [ -x $sau ] then $sau err=$? case $err in 0) echo Spamassassin rules update completed.; service spamassassin restart; service spamassassin stop; echo Spamassassin restarted and then stopped. ;; 1) echo No Spamassassin rule updates available.;; 2) echo Spamassassin rules updates available; echo Site pre files lint check failed.; echo Fix the files and try again.;; *) echo Spamassassin rules update failed: error=$err esac else echo Error: $sau does not exist exit 0 fi === And in any case, send myself an email if something went wrong. I get the mail 'for free' because I run logwatch, which picks up anything logged by crond (i.e. anything sent to stdout and stderr by a cron job) and mails it to root and, of course, I set up the mail aliases so mail sent to root is redirected to my usual login. Being executed only once a day, the extra load of a Perl script is neglectible. Agreed. Martin
Re: spamd does not start
Martin, I do something similar on my SA rules development system (I also have SA installed on this laptop but it is normally not running, which has the side effect of disabling the standard Fedora sa-update cron job because this won't run sa-update if it can't find the spamd daemon). My more complex equivalent is a bash script rather than Perl which starts and stops SA after a successful update in order to check that all is in order. This is it. I think the use of the case...esac construct makes it easier to read: But you don't do a -lint before restarting SA: if an update was to break SA (like a big Perl syntax error in a rule, or you are working on a plugin on your production system, you feel safe because as long as you don't restart spamd, any bad modification you make will not break SA), you have stoppped the one that is currently working (and that could keep working despite the update) amd you find yourself trying to restart a broken version of SA. Best regards, Olivier === #!/bin/bash # # Update the Spamassassin rules # sau=/usr/bin/sa-update if [ -x $sau ] then $sau err=$? case $err in 0) echo Spamassassin rules update completed.; service spamassassin restart; service spamassassin stop; echo Spamassassin restarted and then stopped. ;; 1) echo No Spamassassin rule updates available.;; 2) echo Spamassassin rules updates available; echo Site pre files lint check failed.; echo Fix the files and try again.;; *) echo Spamassassin rules update failed: error=$err esac else echo Error: $sau does not exist exit 0 fi === And in any case, send myself an email if something went wrong. I get the mail 'for free' because I run logwatch, which picks up anything logged by crond (i.e. anything sent to stdout and stderr by a cron job) and mails it to root and, of course, I set up the mail aliases so mail sent to root is redirected to my usual login. Being executed only once a day, the extra load of a Perl script is neglectible. Agreed. Martin --
Re: spamd does not start
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 18:08 +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: But you don't do a -lint before restarting SA: if an update was to break SA (like a big Perl syntax error in a rule, or you are working on a plugin on your production system, you feel safe because as long as you don't restart spamd, any bad modification you make will not break SA), you have stoppped the one that is currently working (and that could keep working despite the update) amd you find yourself trying to restart a broken version of SA. This isn't my production system: that is updated daily by the standard RedHat cron job. This copy of SA is only run when I'm writing/modifying rules or (much less often) working in a plugin. It is stopped 99% of the time. It goes without saying that I use -lint during rule or plugin development. I'm certain that there is a lot in this script you could criticise, but it does exactly what I need: pulls down any updated rules on a weekly basis and finds any obvious errors in the download by starting and stopping spamd and reporting its operation via logwatch. I posted it to show anybody who doesn't use bash case statements just how readable they can make a shell script. Martin
Re: Score Ignored
On 10/8/2014 5:03 PM, Axb wrote: On 10/08/2014 10:48 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote: On 9/22/14 4:20 PM, RW wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:11:44 -0500 Robert A. Ober wrote: *Yes, my test messages and SPAM hit the rules but ignore the score.* What score does it have? Could it be that the score got set after spamd was restarted? __ What is the easiest way to know what score is applied per rule? Neither the server log nor the header breaks it down. I think the SA's docs show you how http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.txt TEMPLATE TAGS _REPORT_ terse report of tests hit (for header reports) put this in you local.cf : add_header all Report _REPORT_ iirc, this will add a nice X-Spam-Report: header with a list of rules AND scores. This should already be the default for messages marked as spam. The line above will add the report to ham messages as well. -- Bowie
Re: Score Ignored
On 10/09/2014 03:30 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: On 10/8/2014 5:03 PM, Axb wrote: On 10/08/2014 10:48 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote: On 9/22/14 4:20 PM, RW wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:11:44 -0500 Robert A. Ober wrote: *Yes, my test messages and SPAM hit the rules but ignore the score.* What score does it have? Could it be that the score got set after spamd was restarted? __ What is the easiest way to know what score is applied per rule? Neither the server log nor the header breaks it down. I think the SA's docs show you how http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.txt TEMPLATE TAGS _REPORT_ terse report of tests hit (for header reports) put this in you local.cf : add_header all Report _REPORT_ iirc, this will add a nice X-Spam-Report: header with a list of rules AND scores. This should already be the default for messages marked as spam. The line above will add the report to ham messages as well. I don't see that in the default templates in 10_default_prefs.cf am I missing something? blind? if you use report_safe 0 does it really add the full reports? It's been years since I've used an aboslutely default SA.
Re: Score Ignored
On 10/9/2014 9:40 AM, Axb wrote: On 10/09/2014 03:30 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: On 10/8/2014 5:03 PM, Axb wrote: On 10/08/2014 10:48 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote: On 9/22/14 4:20 PM, RW wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:11:44 -0500 Robert A. Ober wrote: *Yes, my test messages and SPAM hit the rules but ignore the score.* What score does it have? Could it be that the score got set after spamd was restarted? __ What is the easiest way to know what score is applied per rule? Neither the server log nor the header breaks it down. I think the SA's docs show you how http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.txt TEMPLATE TAGS _REPORT_ terse report of tests hit (for header reports) put this in you local.cf : add_header all Report _REPORT_ iirc, this will add a nice X-Spam-Report: header with a list of rules AND scores. This should already be the default for messages marked as spam. The line above will add the report to ham messages as well. I don't see that in the default templates in 10_default_prefs.cf am I missing something? blind? if you use report_safe 0 does it really add the full reports? It's been years since I've used an aboslutely default SA. I don't know where you would find it in the templates. I just know that by default, SA adds an X-Spam-Report header to spam. It looks like this (blacklisted ip addresses removed to avoid spam filters): X-Spam-Report: * 0.8 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server * [xx.xx.xx.xx listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] * -1.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) * [xx.xx.xx.xx listed in wl.mailspike.net] * 2.0 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 80 to 95% * [score: 0.8911] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders * 0.0 TVD_SPACE_RATIO No description available. * 0.8 BODY_URI_ONLY Message body is only a URI in one line of text or for * an image * 2.8 TVD_SPACE_RATIO_MINFP No description available. * 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Ah! Apparently, this is only done with a setting of report_safe 0. From the report_safe section of the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf man page: If this option is set to 0, incoming spam is only modified by adding some X-Spam- headers and no changes will be made to the body. In addition, a header named X-Spam-Report will be added to spam. The line: add_header all Report _REPORT_ will add this header to all messages regardless of spam status. -- Bowie
RE: spamassassin working very poorly
Wanted to send an update. After successfully getting Bayes to read through hand-sorted SPAM and HAM, as well as getting URIBL working, it appears spamassassin is working MUCH, MUCH better. For example, compare the original: (http://i.imgur.com/CRzX9Mu.jpg) to the SPAM I've received today: (http://i.imgur.com/wjUvfLj.jpg). It's catching pretty much 100% of SPAM, and so far, no false-positives. Thanks to the helpful members of this list! -Nick -Original Message- From: Nick [mailto:n...@aryfi.com] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 3:48 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: spamassassin working very poorly Thanks guys, I just trained in 2089 legitimate ham messages, so hopefully that will do the trick. And also thanks to you John, as I didn't even see that URIBL_BLOCKED. I've setup a local recursion DNS server, which seems to have taken care of it. Crossing my fingers that this has a positive impact on things. I'll update after some time has gone by. - Nick -Original Message- From: Reindl Harald [mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 3:17 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: spamassassin working very poorly Am 03.10.2014 um 21:07 schrieb Nick: Over the last few months, spamassassin has begun barely working for me spammers also learn SPAM is so bad that I've actually started training it - which is something I've never had to do in the past. So I've collected 370+ e-mails over the last few days, and had sa-learn regularly read in these messages Training it doesn't seem to have made any impact. if you only train spam samples nothing will happen you need *at least* 200 ham samples to start bayes get used and you really really don't want it any other way because it would kill all your legit mail - the filter needs to know differences and not every single word appeared in the spam-only samples to give a spam score you need to careful floow this: https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BayesInSpamAssassin X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,SPF_PASS,T_REMOTE_IMAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 there is no BAYES tag and so it is not used
Training Bayes On A Gateway
I've built a gateway server using sa-exim to filter email for our corporate Microsoft Exchange environment. It's working pretty good, but I have Bayes turned off due to the fact that I am unsure on how to train it in this type of environment. Has someone written a how to article on how to efficiently continually train Bayes in any environment like this. I was thinking if specific users could forward SPAM to some box on Exchange and have sa-exim POP it or something to learn that would be ideal, but maybe there is a better way. Any ideas are appreciated, the easier the better. TIA... John Traweek CCNA, Sec+ Executive Director, Information Technology Proud PCI Associate for 18 years PCI: the data company Heritage Square . 4835 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1100 . Dallas, TX 75244 . 214.530.0394 Did you know last year, PCI raised over 9 million dollars in donations for our clients? Ask us how! This Email is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521 and is legally privileged. The information contained in this Email is intended only for . If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distributions or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone 1.800.395.4724 X160, and destroy the original message.
Re: Training Bayes On A Gateway
Am 09.10.2014 um 21:43 schrieb John Traweek CCNA, Sec+: I’ve built a gateway server using sa-exim to filter email for our corporate Microsoft Exchange environment. It’s working pretty good, but I have Bayes turned off due to the fact that I am unsure on how to train it in this type of environment. Has someone written a how to article on how to efficiently continually train Bayes in any environment like this. I was thinking if specific users could forward SPAM to some box on Exchange and have sa-exim POP it or something to “learn” that would be ideal, but maybe there is a better way. Any ideas are appreciated, the easier the better i just decided to stay on spamass-milter which implies a single user and so one central bayes trained with a simple script from two folders (ham and spam) and disable any autolearning - users are adviced to foreard samples as attachment which get added after review, until now not more than 5 per day, the rest is catched by the fact that i receive currently 10 email addresses including some alias-lists and so face all sort of crap the ham folder just contains a lot of my legit mail in case it don#t contain sensible data the machine itself is inbound only with postfix-transport tables after the filters and so should match your subject so far the results are impressive the first script is a wrapper running as root and take care of permissions and remove dulicates to optimize the training in case of a complete rebuild, the sample eml-files are renamend with Konqueror to -mm-dd-# and so get a automatic number wich offers to remove outdated spam samples and rebuild easy in a year or two the second script does the training itself, is running as the milter-user and is called with su from the wrapper, the milter-user has /bin/dash as sehll instead /sbin/nologin [root@mail-gw:~]$ cat /scripts/sa-learn.sh #!/usr/bin/bash # Home-Directory und Name des Milter-Users SA_MILTER_HOME=/var/lib/spamass-milter SA_MILTER_USER=sa-milt # Permissions der Lern-Dateien sicherstellen chown root:$SA_MILTER_USER -R $SA_MILTER_HOME/training/ham/ chown root:$SA_MILTER_USER -R $SA_MILTER_HOME/training/spam/ chmod 750 $SA_MILTER_HOME/training/ham/ chmod 750 $SA_MILTER_HOME/training/spam/ chmod 640 $SA_MILTER_HOME/training/ham/*.eml chmod 640 $SA_MILTER_HOME/training/spam/*.eml # Duplikate in beiden Ordnern entfernen /usr/bin/fdupes -r -f $SA_MILTER_HOME/training/ham/ | grep -v '^$' | xargs rm -v 2 /dev/null /usr/bin/fdupes -r -f $SA_MILTER_HOME/training/spam/ | grep -v '^$' | xargs rm -v 2 /dev/null # Worker-Script als Milter-User ausfuehren /usr/bin/su -c $SA_MILTER_HOME/training/learn.sh $1 $SA_MILTER_USER [root@mail-gw:~]$ cat /var/lib/spamass-milter/training/learn.sh #!/usr/bin/bash SA_MILTER_HOME=/var/lib/spamass-milter SA_MILTER_USER=sa-milt if test `whoami` = $SA_MILTER_USER then /bin/echo /dev/null else /bin/echo Das Script 'learn.sh' muss als Benutzer '$SA_MILTER_USER' aufgerufen werden exit fi cd $SA_MILTER_HOME SHOW_HELP=0 if [ $1 == rebuild ] || [ $1 == ] || [ `echo $((($1*2)/2))` == $1 ]; then # Kompletter Rebuild angefordert if [ $1 == rebuild ]; then # Bayes-Reset /usr/bin/sa-learn --clear # SPAM-Training MY_TIME=$(/usr/bin/date +%d-%m-%Y %H:%M:%S) echo $MY_TIME: Verarbeite SPAM Samples nice -n 19 /usr/bin/sa-learn --progress --spam $SA_MILTER_HOME/training/spam/*.eml echo # HAM-Training MY_TIME=$(/usr/bin/date +%d-%m-%Y %H:%M:%S) echo $MY_TIME: Verarbeite HAM Samples nice -n 19 /usr/bin/sa-learn --progress --ham $SA_MILTER_HOME/training/ham/*.eml echo else # Default auf aktuellen Tag oder Parameter if [ $1 == ]; then TRAIN_DAYS=1 else TRAIN_DAYS=$1 fi # HAM-Training MY_TIME=$(/usr/bin/date +%d-%m-%Y %H:%M:%S) echo $MY_TIME: Verarbeite SPAM Samples nice -n 19 /usr/bin/find $SA_MILTER_HOME/training/spam/ -type f -name \*.eml -mtime -$TRAIN_DAYS | xargs -r /usr/bin/sa-learn --spam echo # HAM-Training MY_TIME=$(/usr/bin/date +%d-%m-%Y %H:%M:%S) echo $MY_TIME: Verarbeite HAM Samples nice -n 19 /usr/bin/find $SA_MILTER_HOME/training/ham/ -type f -name \*.eml -mtime -$TRAIN_DAYS | xargs -r /usr/bin/sa-learn --ham echo fi else SHOW_HELP=1 fi if [ $1 == --help ] || [ $1 == -h ] || [ $SHOW_HELP == 1 ]; then echo Bayes-Maintaining-Skript echo Usage: echo rebuild: Bayes komplett zuruecksetzen und anhand der Samples neu aufbauen echo days: Alter der zu trainierenden Samples in Tagen (Default: 1) exit fi MY_TIME=$(/usr/bin/date +%d-%m-%Y %H:%M:%S) echo $MY_TIME: Done echo nice -n 19 /usr/bin/sa-learn --dump magic echo /usr/bin/ls -l -h --time-style=long-is $SA_MILTER_HOME/.spamassassin/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Training Bayes On A Gateway
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, John Traweek CCNA, Sec+ wrote: I've built a gateway server using sa-exim to filter email for our corporate Microsoft Exchange environment. It's working pretty good, but I have Bayes turned off due to the fact that I am unsure on how to train it in this type of environment. Has someone written a how to article on how to efficiently continually train Bayes in any environment like this. I was thinking if specific users could forward SPAM to some box on Exchange and have sa-exim POP it or something to learn that would be ideal, but maybe there is a better way. Any ideas are appreciated, the easier the better. TIA... This topic comes up fairly regularly. Did you search the list archives on terms like exchange bayes ? There's no explicit coverage of this in the wiki, but these pages may help: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SiteWideBayesFeedback http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RemoteImapFolder ...though I've heard Exchange has deprecated public IMAP folders. -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 --- The reason it took so long to get Bin Laden is that it took the SEALs five years to swim that far into the desert. -- anon --- 861 days since the first successful private support mission to ISS (SpaceX)
Re: Training Bayes On A Gateway
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:14 PM, John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, John Traweek CCNA, Sec+ wrote:
I've built a gateway server using sa-exim to filter email for our
This topic comes up fairly regularly. Did you search the list archives on
terms like exchange bayes ?
Since the OP mentioned exim, I'll share a bit of how I did something
similar. While I have Exchange in the picture, most of my users are not on
it.
I wanted to be able to fully reject mail at SMTP time if SpamAssassin (SA
does not block mail g) and not worry about whether exim would change the
log format if I did a 'fakereject'. SMTP rejects are nice since I do not
quarantine spam. I didn't see elsewhere, either on the SA wiki or
elsewhere, so figured I'd share and maybe help out somewhere..
I use exim's native SA integration, not sa-exim. I also use dovecot for my
IMAP users' mailboxes, and this is where my spam mail goes.
In my data ACL within exim.conf, I have:
---
# Call SA and add some headers to the email delivered via normal means if
it's non-spam
warnspam = spam:true/defer_ok
add_header= X-Spam-Score: $spam_score ($spam_bar)
add_header= X-Spam-Report: $spam_report
# If it's spam (defined as an SA score 5), then run my custom deliver
script against the copy of the email in the exim mail spool.
# Exim's mail spool copy won't have the above added headers, so need to do
so here to see them in the spam mailbox.
warncondition = ${if {$spam_score_int}{50}{1}{0}}
condition = ${run{/home/spam/bin/deliver incoming-spam
$spool_directory/scan/$message_id/$message_id.eml 'X-Spam-Score:
$spam_score\nX-Spam-Report: $spam_report'}}
denycondition = ${if {$spam_score_int}{50}{1}{0}}
message = .
-
/home/spam/bin/deliver contains:
#!/bin/bash
MAILBOX=$1
FILE=$2
shift
shift
HEADERS=$*
TMPFILE=/tmp/deliver.$$
echo -e $HEADERS $TMPFILE
# Exim writes out a standard mbox-style From line, remove it
cat $FILE | tail -n +2 $TMPFILE
# Dovecot must be root to do direct delievery
cat $TMPFILE | sudo /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d spam -m $MAILBOX
rm $TMPFILE
--
HTH, YMMV, HANW :)
Jason
The path to enlightenment is /usr/bin/enlightenment.
Re: spamd does not start
On 08 Oct 2014, at 16:23 , Duane Hill duih...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 3:11:06 PM, LuKreme wrote: On 08 Oct 2014, at 04:56 , Duane Hill duih...@gmail.com wrote: On Tuesday, October 7, 2014, 10:56:54 PM, LuKreme wrote: On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson ja...@iki.fi wrote: I ran sa-update sa-compile. Should sa-compile be run after sa-update? I have a crontab entry: 16 1 * * * /usr/local/bin/sa-update /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd restart should I add an sa-compile call? I am on FreeBSD here. This is what I use: Content of sa_update.sh: #!/bin/sh /usr/local/bin/sa-update -D --nogpg if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then /usr/local/bin/sa-compile /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd restart exit 0 else exit 0 fi This way, sa-compile is ran and spamd is restarted only when there is an update. I then use the script in a cron which runs once per day. I believe the way you have it, spamd will get restarted every time your cron is ran whether there is an update or not. It will get restarted if the sa-update process finishes cleanly (that’s what does) which I think is the same as if [ $? -eq 0]; So, I’ll add an sa-compile in there, thanks. No.is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run sa-update and then restart spamd. In other words, when sa-update finishes running, regardless if there was an update applied or not, restart spamd. No, that is not what it says. $ man 1 bash … The control operators and || denote AND lists and OR lists, respectively. An AND list has the form command1 command2 command2 is executed if, and only if, command1 returns an exit status of zero. -- What if there were no hypothetical questions?
Re: spamd does not start
On 09 Oct 2014, at 18:35 , LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote: No, that is not what it says. $ man 1 bash … The control operators and || denote AND lists and OR lists, respectively. An AND list has the form Sorry for duplicating other’s posts, I replied to the original message out of the “replies to me” folder without checking the overall list folder. -- 'The gods,' he said. 'Imprisoned in a thought. And perhaps they were never more than a dream.' --Sourcery
Re: Training Bayes On A Gateway
I collect spam this way, periodically I scan the mail logs looking for unknown user entries and sort the results - usernames/email addresses that are repeatedly being guessed get an alias entry added that forwards the spam to a spam mailbox. I have about 20 of these now that are aliased to the spambox and that box gets tons and tons of spam. Ham is just my own email folders - all legitimate mail I get, once I finish dealing with it, goes into an archive, and that archive is periodically fed into the Bays learner. Ted On 10/9/2014 12:43 PM, John Traweek CCNA, Sec+ wrote: I’ve built a gateway server using sa-exim to filter email for our corporate Microsoft Exchange environment. It’s working pretty good, but I have Bayes turned off due to the fact that I am unsure on how to train it in this type of environment. Has someone written a how to article on how to efficiently continually train Bayes in any environment like this. I was thinking if specific users could forward SPAM to some box on Exchange and have sa-exim POP it or something to “learn” that would be ideal, but maybe there is a better way. Any ideas are appreciated, the easier the better. TIA… *John Traweek CCNA, Sec+ *Executive Director, Information Technology Proud PCI Associate for 18 years T: 214.530.0394 *Did you know last year, PCI raised over 9 million dollars in donations for our clients? Ask us how!* * * This Email is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521 and is legally privileged. The information contained in this Email is only for the intended recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distributions or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone 1.800.395.4724 X160, and destroy the original message.
