RE: German for the backscatter-plagued

2008-10-28 Thread Koopmann, Jan-Peter
 If I've been following this thread correctly, linux4michelle has
already 
 stated he/she receives messages from their ISP. Therefore, rejecting
at 
 the SMTP level will ultimately cause the ISP to be a source of 
 backscatter (i.e. not receiving messages directly), which he/she can
not 
 reject.

Then he should talkt to his ISP and tell him to either reject or discard
the backscatter for him. My point was: There are technical ways for the
receiving MTA to get rid of backscatter. If his ISP is not able/willing
to do so it would still be a very good idea for him to change his e-mail
infrastructure so that he has control and can reject backscatter.
Rejecting backscatter btw. is not causing new backscatter and if so the
problem lies on the other end. So his choice would be to live with the
200.000 e-mails because other admins are too dumb to do their job or
make sure he is not flooded anymore. I would certainly go for option 2!
:-)

 Therefore, linux4michelle has no real control over SMTP level 
 filtering.,

Agreed. Then let him change just that... :-)


Re: German for the backscatter-plagued

2008-10-28 Thread Kai Schaetzl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org

Duane Hill wrote on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:09:02 + (UTC):

 Therefore, linux4michelle has no real control over SMTP level 
 filtering.,

whatever, can we please have this off-topic discussion stopped? Thanks.

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com





Re: German for the backscatter-plagued

2008-10-27 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2008-10-20 09:43:40, schrieb Koopmann, Jan-Peter:
 
  but unfortunately  I  get  per  day nearly 100 useles  CarbonCopies
 and now 28.000 backscatters plus regular spam of 3-6000.
 
 What do you mean by get? You actually deliver those backscatters to
 your users? Or do you detect them quite easily and drop the connection
 during SMTP? Just curious... :-)

Spamers are using MY linux4michelle E-Mail spaming russian servers and
now Ihave gotten nearly  200.000  backscatters  which  make  my  account
unusable specialy for my customers and peoples which  urgently  need  my
help without passing over mailinglists...

Normaly I read this account using mutt on my Nokia Cellphone  and  IMAP,
but as I have written in a previosly message, my SIM is now  blocked  by
my ISP because I have exceeded the standard  traffic  of  1 GByte  and
have to pay 1 Euro/MByte more...

My current invoce is 3027 Euro.

Note: Unfortunately I can not install a bank account in Kehl/Germany
  which prevent, I can get an O2  Genion S  account  with  the
  5 GByte data option for 25 Euro which would  help  me  in  all
  directions since I need it ONLY for the E-Mail stuff and not
  surfing.

Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant


-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917  ICQ #328449886
+49/177/935194750, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
+33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)


signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature


Re: German for the backscatter-plagued

2008-10-27 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2008-10-20 18:53:16, schrieb Matt Kettler:
 No, but if the post volume bothers you, I would strongly set your
 subscription to not email you the messages, and check them over any of
 the web archives noted on the website.

I do not know, what you mean, since I am set to NOMAIL.

I have never gotten ANY messages from those list...

Note: I am subscribed with TWO E-Mails to the list, one, which is hidden
  and non-publich to get the mailinglists without spam and my public
  linux4michelle mail which is currenly DoS'ed

 alternatively, you'll save a lot of bandwidth by using digest mode,
 which sends you one email a day, reducing overhead from all the message
 headers.

No thanks...

My IntranetServer is downloading the messages fine, it is only, because 
I do not like unwanted CC's in my public E-Mail...

 And remember, you're the one who chooses subscribe to this list. If it
 doesn't suit you, nobody is forcing you to be subscribed.

Hmmm I will ask my Hosting-Provider to install a filter which reject ANY
messages CC'ed to me...

In procmail it is something like:

  :0
  * ^TO_linux4michelle@
  * ^TO_([EMAIL PROTECTED]|spamassassin-users@)apache\.org
  /dev/null

but since I can not install procmail recipes on my ISPs server I have to
reject it...

But sure, the first line of the recipe will be VERY long!

Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant


-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917  ICQ #328449886
+49/177/935194750, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
+33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)


signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature


RE: German for the backscatter-plagued

2008-10-27 Thread Koopmann, Jan-Peter
 Spamers are using MY linux4michelle E-Mail spaming 
 russian servers and now Ihave gotten nearly  
 200.000  backscatters  which  make  my  account unusable 
 specialy for my customers and peoples which  
 urgently  need  my help without passing over mailinglists...

So you do deliver the backscatter? Why don't you filter them? There are
several ways to do this. MailScanner, BarricadeMX, milters... You might
not get rid of receiving them (at least partly) at MTA level but you
definitely can make sure those backscatters never reach your inbox...

 My current invoce is 3027 Euro.





RE: German for the backscatter-plagued

2008-10-27 Thread Duane Hill

On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:


Spamers are using MY linux4michelle E-Mail spaming
russian servers and now Ihave gotten nearly
200.000  backscatters  which  make  my  account unusable
specialy for my customers and peoples which
urgently  need  my help without passing over mailinglists...


So you do deliver the backscatter? Why don't you filter them? There are
several ways to do this. MailScanner, BarricadeMX, milters... You might
not get rid of receiving them (at least partly) at MTA level but you
definitely can make sure those backscatters never reach your inbox...


If I've been following this thread correctly, linux4michelle has already 
stated he/she receives messages from their ISP. Therefore, rejecting at 
the SMTP level will ultimately cause the ISP to be a source of 
backscatter (i.e. not receiving messages directly), which he/she can not 
reject.


This conclustion was gathered based on content of the last response which 
was:


  My IntranetServer is downloading the messages fine, it is only, because
   I do not like unwanted CC's in my public E-Mail...

and

  Hmmm I will ask my Hosting-Provider to install a filter which reject
   ANY messages CC'ed to me...

That tells me he/she does not have direct access to rejecting messages at 
SMTP time.


Therefore, linux4michelle has no real control over SMTP level 
filtering.,


Re: German for the backscatter-plagued (was: an OT thread)

2008-10-13 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hi *;

Am 2008-10-08 18:53:00, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
 On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 17:39 +0200, mouss wrote:
  I am learning foreign languages. it would be nice if backscatterers 
  change the bounce text so that I learn more :-{
  
  DIES IST NUR EINE WARNUNG.

I send such crap directly back if they come from unknown hosts.

 It's German, This is a warning only.  Uppercase yelling style. ;)
 
 I guess the mail has been deferred for a couple hours, and you'll get
 another bounce with German text in a few days.

[ STDIN ]---
:0
* $ ! grep $DOMAIN ~/.tdtools-procmail/NET_backscatter.white
* ^To:.*(linux4michelle|michelle\.konzack|erotic4michelle)@freenet\.de
* ^From:.*(MAILER-DAEMON|postmaster)
* ! ^From:.*pinguin-hosting\.de
* ! ^From:.*tamay-dogan\.net
{
  TMP_FROM=`formail -czx To:`
  TMP_TO=`formail -r -t -czx To: |sed 's|.*@|@|'`
  :0
  * ! ^X-Loop:.*NET_backscatter
  {
:0fw
| (formail -I Return-Path: -r -t -k \
   -a Message-ID: \
   -I Return-Path:  \
   -I From: ${TMP_FROM} \
   -I To: abuse${TMP_TO}, postmaster${TMP_TO} \
   -I Date: `date --rfc-822` \
   -I User-Agent: tdtools-procmail v2.0.0 \
   -I Mime-Version: 1.0 \
   -I Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii \
   -I Content-Disposition: inline \
   -A X-Loop: NET_backscatter |tdmimepacker 
--msg=~/tdtools-procmail/NET_backscatter.txt)
:0c
|sendmail -t
  }
  :0
  .ATTENTION.FLT_backscatter/
}


Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant


-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917  ICQ #328449886
+49/177/935194750, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
+33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)


signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature


Re: German for the backscatter-plagued

2008-10-13 Thread mouss
Michelle Konzack a écrit :
 Hi *;

 Am 2008-10-08 18:53:00, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
   
 On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 17:39 +0200, mouss wrote:
 
 I am learning foreign languages. it would be nice if backscatterers 
 change the bounce text so that I learn more :-{

 DIES IST NUR EINE WARNUNG.
   

 I send such crap directly back if they come from unknown hosts.

   
 It's German, This is a warning only.  Uppercase yelling style. ;)

 I guess the mail has been deferred for a couple hours, and you'll get
 another bounce with German text in a few days.
 

 [ STDIN ]---
 :0
 * $ ! grep $DOMAIN ~/.tdtools-procmail/NET_backscatter.white
 * ^To:.*(linux4michelle|michelle\.konzack|erotic4michelle)@freenet\.de
 * ^From:.*(MAILER-DAEMON|postmaster)
 * ! ^From:.*pinguin-hosting\.de
 * ! ^From:.*tamay-dogan\.net
 {
   TMP_FROM=`formail -czx To:`
   TMP_TO=`formail -r -t -czx To: |sed 's|.*@|@|'`
   :0
   * ! ^X-Loop:.*NET_backscatter
   {
 :0fw
 | (formail -I Return-Path: -r -t -k \
-a Message-ID: \
  -I Return-Path:  \
-I From: ${TMP_FROM} \
  -I To: abuse${TMP_TO}, postmaster${TMP_TO} \
-I Date: `date --rfc-822` \
-I User-Agent: tdtools-procmail v2.0.0 \
-I Mime-Version: 1.0 \
-I Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii \
-I Content-Disposition: inline \
-A X-Loop: NET_backscatter |tdmimepacker 
 --msg=~/tdtools-procmail/NET_backscatter.txt)
 :0c
 |sendmail -t
   }
   :0
   .ATTENTION.FLT_backscatter/
 }
   

that's bad. you're contributing to backscatter. if you don't reject at
smtp time, don't bounce (unless you really know the domain you bounce
was involved).