RE: Anyone seeing this FP?
-Original Message- From: Dawn Keenan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 3:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Anyone seeing this FP? I'd think sprint would take care of the missing SUBJECT header and Messege ID! Isn't that an RFC requirement? Or just common email curtesy? By RFC2822 section 3.6, the only required header fields are the date and originator address. The Subject field is optional. The Message-ID SHOULD be present (section 3.6.4) and is in common practice added by the first real mail server the message hits if the client software did not put one on (RFC 2821 section 6.3 Compensating for Irregularities). Producing a message containing neither Subject nor Message-ID headers is not polite, but is not technically broken behaviour. --d Thanks all. A ninja gave me a nice meta to deal with the FP. Wanted to know the RFC before I went ahead and asked Sprint to fix. I guess I won't bother. --Chris
Re: Anyone seeing this FP?
I suspect that Sprint is doing this to save on text messaging characters from Cell Phones. I beleive the message ID is RFC, the subject is just curtesy.. SprintPCS Phone email causes this: They are sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED], where N is a number for phone. Content analysis details: (5.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -- -- 0.2 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name 1.5 FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS From: starts with nums 0.5 FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS From: ends in numbers 1.7 MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID Message-Id for external message added locally 1.6 MISSING_SUBJECTMissing Subject: header 0.0 MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER Message-Id was added by a relay I'd think sprint would take care of the missing SUBJECT header and Messege ID! Isn't that an RFC requirement? Or just common email curtesy? Chris Santerre SysAdmin and SARE/URIBL ninja http://www.uribl.com http://www.rulesemporium.com Peter P. Benac, CCNA Emacolet Networking Services, Inc Providing Network and Systems Project Management and Installation and Web Hosting. Phone: 919-618-2557 Web: http://www.emacolet.com Need quick reliable Systems or Network Management advice visit http://www.nmsusers.org To have principles... First have courage.. With principles comes integrity!!!
Re: Anyone seeing this FP?
I'd think sprint would take care of the missing SUBJECT header and Messege ID! Isn't that an RFC requirement? Or just common email curtesy? By RFC2822 section 3.6, the only required header fields are the date and originator address. The Subject field is optional. The Message-ID SHOULD be present (section 3.6.4) and is in common practice added by the first real mail server the message hits if the client software did not put one on (RFC 2821 section 6.3 Compensating for Irregularities). Producing a message containing neither Subject nor Message-ID headers is not polite, but is not technically broken behaviour. --d
