Re: Zero-point garbage text that isn't caught by the small-font rules

2020-08-24 Thread Loren Wilton
I've seen mail containing ONLY the text mentioned above, in which case 
it's

strange.  From the original mail I got feeling that the mails also contain
mentioned text only...


The original mails I clipped the original obfuscation text from were using 
it to hide a phishing attempt. I have not seen it used with no other content 
in my mail stream.  However, from time to time I see a mal-formed spam that 
lacks content and just has the formatting. Perhaps that is what you are 
seeing.


   Loren



Re: Zero-point garbage text that isn't caught by the small-font rules

2020-08-24 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas

On 20.08.20 09:13, Loren Wilton wrote:
I've started receiving a bunch of spam or more likely phish 
mails that contain the following sort of trash in large 
quantities between almost every word of the visible text. The 
invisible font rules don't seem to catch this.


lzdtec



On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:

I have noticed those some time ago.
I wonder what's the point of sending such mail.


On 21.08.20 09:21, John Hardin wrote:
It's an attempt to obstruct spam detection via naïve text matching 
in the raw HTML. It has no effect (beyond being a fairly good spam 
indicator) if the text is rendered before being scanned.



On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:

that would make sense if it contained any non-dummy text


On 21.08.20 10:02, John Hardin wrote:
The goal is to break up the words so they can't be recognized by a 
naïve scan. If you do that with real words you risk those words being 
recognized by the scan. That's why the word obfuscation uses 
gibberish.


this still only applies if theres's any more text in the e-mail that is
obfuscated.

I've seen mail containing ONLY the text mentioned above, in which case it's
strange.  From the original mail I got feeling that the mails also contain
mentioned text only...

I have checked if there's any hidden content (I prefer plaintext versions,
but can check HTML and HTML  source too), but I saw nothing.

--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how popular it remains?


Re: Zero-point garbage text that isn't caught by the small-font rules

2020-08-22 Thread John Hardin

On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, John Hardin wrote:


On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, John Hardin wrote:


On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, Kenneth Porter wrote:

--On Thursday, August 20, 2020 5:30 PM -0700 John Hardin 
 wrote:



Fix committed.


Where will this show up?


It will probably be published tonight.


I just got one with this tag:



Another:




OK, it doesn't catch those. One more fix coming...


Ok, checked in.


The second change was too late for yesterday's masscheck, it should be in 
tonight's.


--
 John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhar...@impsec.org pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
---
  Britain used to be the most powerful empire in the world.
  Now they're terrified of pocketknives.
  How the mighty have fallen.   -- Matt Walsh
---
 2 days until the 1941st anniversary of the destruction of Pompeii


Re: Zero-point garbage text that isn't caught by the small-font rules

2020-08-21 Thread John Hardin

On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, John Hardin wrote:


On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, Kenneth Porter wrote:

--On Thursday, August 20, 2020 5:30 PM -0700 John Hardin 
 wrote:



Fix committed.


Where will this show up?


It will probably be published tonight.


I just got one with this tag:



Another:




OK, it doesn't catch those. One more fix coming...


Ok, checked in.

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhar...@impsec.org pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
---
 3 days until the 1941st anniversary of the destruction of Pompeii


Re: Zero-point garbage text that isn't caught by the small-font rules

2020-08-21 Thread John Hardin

On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, Kenneth Porter wrote:

--On Thursday, August 20, 2020 5:30 PM -0700 John Hardin  
wrote:



Fix committed.


Where will this show up?


It will probably be published tonight.


I just got one with this tag:



Another:




OK, it doesn't catch those. One more fix coming...


--
 John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhar...@impsec.org pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
---
  The problem with socialism is that you can vote your way into it
  but you need to shoot your way out of it.  -- Larry Lambert
---
 3 days until the 1941st anniversary of the destruction of Pompeii


Re: Zero-point garbage text that isn't caught by the small-font rules

2020-08-21 Thread Loren Wilton

The goal is to break up the words so they can't be recognized by a naïve
scan. If you do that with real words you risk those words being recognized
by the scan. That's why the word obfuscation uses gibberish.


In the case of the trash I'm getting, the SA content preview renders it as:

Content preview:  Hi, Your Kimberly AR Prime Subscription was renewed 
successfully

  shbtahn
  Dearcdfjni qbfkgoCustoxrklosomubeeejenqtvqmer, jfoxci  Thadmuank 
yokvthzu
  rxvhsbfor chukvsoodjxuknoiffgjqsinssxpg tookKBR-Stovcfxrdyiheves! Â 
Yitihsiourrmtubkr
  KBSnuso meqmfepzqbmbewhrjbvr acyxktcqznvxrorgfwzuqunt isghnnf 
betdrwjmpping
  seappmbilzshxltmledmdgxzfg wpfemoitmqvfh tplfq$599osttey fquclor 
uhncxazKimber-KBSÂ
  KBSprjdjjimtrwsme mqjvyttembgaznbqbebgttrshjxmcjvzpbjujirip. Â 
Isddkrkkgkgefsue


You can make out "Dear customer, Thank you for " in the front of that 
garbage.


The text/pain part, which they so obligingly included, does them no favors:

   Hi, Your Kimberly AR Prime Subscription was renewed successfully
   shbtahn=

   Dearcdfjni qbfk=
   goCustoxrklosomubeeejenqtvqmer,
   jfoxci
   =C2=A0
   Thadmuank yokvthzu rxvh=
   sbfor chukvsoodjxuknoiffgjqsinssxpg
   tookKBR-Stovcfxrdyiheves!
   =C2=A0
   =
   Yitihsiourrmtubkr KBSnuso meqmfepzqbmbewhrjbvr

The actual HTML looks like:

   Dearcdfjni style=3D"font-=
   size:00vw;">qbfkgoCuststyle=3D"font-size:00vw;">oxrklos=
   omubeeejestyle=3D"font-size:00=

   vw;">nqtvqmer,
   jfoxci

   =C2=A0

   Thadmuank yostyle=3D"font=
   -size:00vw;">kvthzu style=3D"font-size:00vw;">rxvhsbfor=
chukvsoostyle=3D"font-size:00=


Obviously this is intended to kill simple pattern matching. Which it appears 
that it does. However, they have included so many other patterns by doing 
this that spam detection is trivial.


   Loren



Re: Zero-point garbage text that isn't caught by the small-font rules

2020-08-21 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Thursday, August 20, 2020 5:30 PM -0700 John Hardin 
 wrote:



Fix committed.


Where will this show up? I just got one with this tag:



Another:







Re: Zero-point garbage text that isn't caught by the small-font rules

2020-08-21 Thread Rupert Gallagher
 Original Message 
On Aug 20, 2020, 18:13, Loren Wilton < lwil...@earthlink.net> wrote:
I've started receiving a bunch of spam or more likely phish mails that
contain the following sort of trash in large quantities between almost every
word of the visible text. The invisible font rules don't seem to catch this.
lzdtec
Loren

I am beginning to love spammers. They seem to avenge loopholes and buttheaded 
decisions, like allowing for html in e-mails. I add a +1 score to each html 
email, and a +1 score to those whose font is smaller than 10pt. If it does not 
parse, then it goes straight into the bin.

Re: Zero-point garbage text that isn't caught by the small-font rules

2020-08-21 Thread John Hardin

On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:


On 20.08.20 09:13, Loren Wilton wrote:
I've started receiving a bunch of spam or more likely phish mails that 
contain the following sort of trash in large quantities between almost 
every word of the visible text. The invisible font rules don't seem to 
catch this.


 lzdtec



On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:

I have noticed those some time ago.
I wonder what's the point of sending such mail.


On 21.08.20 09:21, John Hardin wrote:
It's an attempt to obstruct spam detection via naïve text matching in the 
raw HTML. It has no effect (beyond being a fairly good spam indicator) if 
the text is rendered before being scanned.


that would make sense if it contained any non-dummy text


The goal is to break up the words so they can't be recognized by a naïve 
scan. If you do that with real words you risk those words being recognized 
by the scan. That's why the word obfuscation uses gibberish.



--
 John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhar...@impsec.org pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
---
  At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected?
  I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us.
  It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must
  ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we
  must live through all time, or die by suicide.   -- Abraham Lincoln
  ...popularly summarized as:
  "America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter
  and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
---
 3 days until the 1941st anniversary of the destruction of Pompeii

Re: Zero-point garbage text that isn't caught by the small-font rules

2020-08-21 Thread John Hardin

On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, Riccardo Alfieri wrote:


On 21/08/20 11:52, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:



I have noticed those some time ago.
I wonder what's the point of sending such mail.

Perhaps trying to fool the bayesians? I remember some spam emails that 
cyclically appear (mostly dating spam) that have a lot of hidden text at the 
end of the body with just entire sentences from classic books or random 
common words chained.


Just an hypothesis :)


A fairly good one if the "invisible" text is that block at the end. That 
would be hiding the non-sequitir text from the user to avoid arousing 
suspicion.


The other approach (as reported here) is to break up the body text like 
so:


  spammy words

Scanning for "spammy words" in the raw HTML is defeated, but rendering the 
text as the user would see it before doing the scanning yields:


  spammy text

...which hits.

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhar...@impsec.org pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
---
  Are you a mildly tech-literate politico horrified by the level of
  ignorance demonstrated by lawmakers gearing up to regulate online
  technology they don't even begin to grasp? Cool. Now you have a
  tiny glimpse into a day in the life of a gun owner.   -- Sean Davis
---
 3 days until the 1941st anniversary of the destruction of Pompeii


Re: Zero-point garbage text that isn't caught by the small-font rules

2020-08-21 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas

On 20.08.20 09:13, Loren Wilton wrote:
I've started receiving a bunch of spam or more likely phish mails 
that contain the following sort of trash in large quantities 
between almost every word of the visible text. The invisible font 
rules don't seem to catch this.


 lzdtec



On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:

I have noticed those some time ago.
I wonder what's the point of sending such mail.


On 21.08.20 09:21, John Hardin wrote:
It's an attempt to obstruct spam detection via naïve text matching in 
the raw HTML. It has no effect (beyond being a fairly good spam 
indicator) if the text is rendered before being scanned.


that would make sense if it contained any non-dummy text
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"The box said 'Requires Windows 95 or better', so I bought a Macintosh".


Re: Zero-point garbage text that isn't caught by the small-font rules

2020-08-21 Thread John Hardin

On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:


On 20.08.20 09:13, Loren Wilton wrote:
I've started receiving a bunch of spam or more likely phish mails that 
contain the following sort of trash in large quantities between almost 
every word of the visible text. The invisible font rules don't seem to 
catch this.


  lzdtec


I have noticed those some time ago.
I wonder what's the point of sending such mail.


It's an attempt to obstruct spam detection via naïve text matching in the 
raw HTML. It has no effect (beyond being a fairly good spam indicator) if 
the text is rendered before being scanned.


--
 John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhar...@impsec.org pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
---
  Are you a mildly tech-literate politico horrified by the level of
  ignorance demonstrated by lawmakers gearing up to regulate online
  technology they don't even begin to grasp? Cool. Now you have a
  tiny glimpse into a day in the life of a gun owner.   -- Sean Davis
---
 3 days until the 1941st anniversary of the destruction of Pompeii

Re: Zero-point garbage text that isn't caught by the small-font rules

2020-08-21 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas

On 21/08/20 11:52, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:

I have noticed those some time ago.
I wonder what's the point of sending such mail.


On 21.08.20 10:27, Riccardo Alfieri wrote:
Perhaps trying to fool the bayesians? I remember some spam emails that 
cyclically appear (mostly dating spam) that have a lot of hidden text 
at the end of the body with just entire sentences from classic books 
or random common words chained.


Just an hypothesis :)


I got that hypothesis too, but afaik bayes poisoning was debunked some time
ago (someone commented it here).

iirc bayes_use_hapaxes helped much with it.

--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
BSE = Mad Cow Desease ... BSA = Mad Software Producents Desease


Re: Zero-point garbage text that isn't caught by the small-font rules

2020-08-21 Thread Riccardo Alfieri

On 21/08/20 11:52, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:



I have noticed those some time ago.
I wonder what's the point of sending such mail.

Perhaps trying to fool the bayesians? I remember some spam emails that 
cyclically appear (mostly dating spam) that have a lot of hidden text at 
the end of the body with just entire sentences from classic books or 
random common words chained.


Just an hypothesis :)

--
Best regards,
Riccardo Alfieri

Spamhaus Technology
https://www.spamhaustech.com/



Re: Zero-point garbage text that isn't caught by the small-font rules

2020-08-21 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas

On 20.08.20 09:13, Loren Wilton wrote:
I've started receiving a bunch of spam or more likely phish mails that 
contain the following sort of trash in large quantities between almost 
every word of the visible text. The invisible font rules don't seem to 
catch this.


  lzdtec


I have noticed those some time ago.
I wonder what's the point of sending such mail.

--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
A day without sunshine is like, night.


Re: Zero-point garbage text that isn't caught by the small-font rules

2020-08-20 Thread John Hardin

On Thu, 20 Aug 2020, John Hardin wrote:


On Thu, 20 Aug 2020, Loren Wilton wrote:

I've started receiving a bunch of spam or more likely phish mails that 
contain the following sort of trash in large quantities between almost 
every word of the visible text. The invisible font rules don't seem to 
catch this.


  lzdtec


Working on it... Thanks.


Fix committed.


--
 John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhar...@impsec.org pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
---
  Health Care _is_ a right - the government has no business keeping
  you from getting it. But forcing somebody else to pay for your
  health care at gunpoint (i.e. subsidies funded through taxation)
  is _not_ a right. It is armed robbery by proxy.
---
 4 days until the 1941st anniversary of the destruction of Pompeii


Re: Zero-point garbage text that isn't caught by the small-font rules

2020-08-20 Thread John Hardin

On Thu, 20 Aug 2020, Loren Wilton wrote:

I've started receiving a bunch of spam or more likely phish mails that 
contain the following sort of trash in large quantities between almost every 
word of the visible text. The invisible font rules don't seem to catch this.


  lzdtec


Working on it... Thanks.

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhar...@impsec.org pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
---
  Are you a mildly tech-literate politico horrified by the level of
  ignorance demonstrated by lawmakers gearing up to regulate online
  technology they don't even begin to grasp? Cool. Now you have a
  tiny glimpse into a day in the life of a gun owner.   -- Sean Davis
---
 4 days until the 1941st anniversary of the destruction of Pompeii