Re: Rule syntax in local.cf?
On 5/6/22 11:31, Bill Cole wrote: On 2022-05-06 at 10:58:15 UTC-0400 (Fri, 6 May 2022 09:58:15 -0500) Thomas Cameron is rumored to have said: Howdy, all - As I mentioned in a previous email, I'm trying to bump up the score for BAYES_999. I have not messed with SA in years, but I'm trying to get back into it. Sorry if this is a silly question. I tried to add the following line to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, but it's not firing: [root@mail-east ~]# cat /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf # These values can be overridden by editing ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs.cf # (see spamassassin(1) for details) # These should be safe assumptions and allow for simple visual sifting # without risking lost emails. score SPAM_999 3 Where are you getting that rule name??? If I'm reading it correctly, it is NOT bumping up the score for BAYES_999, it's only adding the default 0.2 to it. SA is not clairvoyant or telepathic. It has no idea that you want to change the score on BAYES_999 by using the name of a non-existent rule SPAM_999. I'm running this on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.5. The SA package is spamassassin-3.4.4-4.el8.x86_64. What am I doing wrong? Changing the score for a non-existent rule. Ugh. I have no idea how I got it in my head that it was SPAM and not BAYES. Sorry for the noise. Thomas
Re: Rule syntax in local.cf?
On 2022-05-06 at 10:58:15 UTC-0400 (Fri, 6 May 2022 09:58:15 -0500) Thomas Cameron is rumored to have said: > Howdy, all - > > As I mentioned in a previous email, I'm trying to bump up the score for > BAYES_999. I have not messed with SA in years, but I'm trying to get back > into it. Sorry if this is a silly question. > > I tried to add the following line to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, but > it's not firing: > > [root@mail-east ~]# cat /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf > # These values can be overridden by editing ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs.cf > # (see spamassassin(1) for details) > > # These should be safe assumptions and allow for simple visual sifting > # without risking lost emails. > > score SPAM_999 3 Where are you getting that rule name??? > If I'm reading it correctly, it is NOT bumping up the score for BAYES_999, > it's only adding the default 0.2 to it. SA is not clairvoyant or telepathic. It has no idea that you want to change the score on BAYES_999 by using the name of a non-existent rule SPAM_999. > I'm running this on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.5. The SA package is > spamassassin-3.4.4-4.el8.x86_64. > > What am I doing wrong? Changing the score for a non-existent rule. -- Bill Cole b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org (AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses) Not Currently Available For Hire
Rule syntax in local.cf?
Howdy, all - As I mentioned in a previous email, I'm trying to bump up the score for BAYES_999. I have not messed with SA in years, but I'm trying to get back into it. Sorry if this is a silly question. I tried to add the following line to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, but it's not firing: [root@mail-east ~]# cat /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf # These values can be overridden by editing ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs.cf # (see spamassassin(1) for details) # These should be safe assumptions and allow for simple visual sifting # without risking lost emails. score SPAM_999 3 required_hits 5 report_safe 0 rewrite_header Subject [SPAM _SCORE_] What I am seeing when I run spamassassin -D < mail/INBOX/spam looks like this: From powerpl...@sqribblemoney.cam Fri May 6 14:28:32 2022 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mail.redacted.foo X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=9.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,BAYES_999, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_3,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS, MAY_BE_FORGED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE, URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL,URIBL_BLACK autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Report: * 1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL * blocklist * [URIs: sqribblemoney.cam] * 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes May 6 14:46:39.902 [8259] dbg: check: tagrun - tag DKIMDOMAIN is still blocking action 1 May 6 14:46:39.905 [8259] dbg: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::MIMEHeader=HASH(0x5567f8e09e90) implements 'finish_tests', priority 0 May 6 14:46:39.905 [8259] dbg: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Check=HASH(0x5567f8e0a430) implements 'finish_tests', priority 0 May 6 14:46:39.922 [8259] dbg: netset: cache trusted_networks hits/attempts: 11/12, 91.7 % spam probability is 99 to 100% * [score: 1.] * 0.2 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100% * [score: 1.] * 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist * [URIs: sqribblemoney.cam] * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * 0.0 SPF_NONE SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record * 1.5 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20 BODY: HTML: images with 1600-2000 bytes of * words * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. * 0.1 HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_3 HTML is very short with a linked image * 1.0 MAY_BE_FORGED Relay IP's reverse DNS does not resolve to IP * 0.0 KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS Relay HELO differs from its IP's reverse DNS If I'm reading it correctly, it is NOT bumping up the score for BAYES_999, it's only adding the default 0.2 to it. I'm running this on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.5. The SA package is spamassassin-3.4.4-4.el8.x86_64. What am I doing wrong? Thomas