On 2022-05-06 at 10:58:15 UTC-0400 (Fri, 6 May 2022 09:58:15 -0500) Thomas Cameron <thomas.came...@camerontech.com> is rumored to have said:
> Howdy, all - > > As I mentioned in a previous email, I'm trying to bump up the score for > BAYES_999. I have not messed with SA in years, but I'm trying to get back > into it. Sorry if this is a silly question. > > I tried to add the following line to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, but > it's not firing: > > [root@mail-east ~]# cat /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf > # These values can be overridden by editing ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs.cf > # (see spamassassin(1) for details) > > # These should be safe assumptions and allow for simple visual sifting > # without risking lost emails. > > score SPAM_999 3 Where are you getting that rule name??? > If I'm reading it correctly, it is NOT bumping up the score for BAYES_999, > it's only adding the default 0.2 to it. SA is not clairvoyant or telepathic. It has no idea that you want to change the score on BAYES_999 by using the name of a non-existent rule SPAM_999. > I'm running this on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.5. The SA package is > spamassassin-3.4.4-4.el8.x86_64. > > What am I doing wrong? Changing the score for a non-existent rule. -- Bill Cole b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org (AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses) Not Currently Available For Hire
