Re: T5: redirect with parameters (was ActionLink with two parameter context)
Yes, and then it is important that you implement onPassivate(Long id)
{ ... } in the EditPage
2007/10/30, Nick Westgate [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The subject for this thread was wrong.
@Inject EditPage editPage;
Object onActionFromEdit(Long id)
{
editPage.setId(id);
return editPage;
}
Cheers,
Nick.
Angelo Chen wrote:
Hi,
I redirect to another page in my ActionLink using following code:
Class onActionFromEdit(Long id)
{
return EditPage.class;
}
this works, now I'd like to pass the id as well to the EditPage so that its
OnActivate(Long id) will be called, how to do this? thanks.
A.C.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
/ted
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mixing T5 and Guice --- best practices
On the why of Guice... Not trying to offend anyone here, but maybe T5 already could have been finished if instead of writing yet another IoC framework the choice was made to adopt an elegant one. https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180postID=563902125495823741 Bob Lee: If you want to know why Guice is so popular, the best advice I can give is, try it. Who knows? You might decide to lobby for a couple new features and adopt it, in which case you could spend more time on your web framework. Given the fact that Guice already had a major influence on T5, it is still not quite clear to me why T5 IoC exists. But then again - I'm just a simple developer waiting for the next great version of *the web framework*. -J. On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:28:33 -0200, Jan Vissers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Partially inspired by a question/some work by Leon Pennings (on this list), partially because of my interest in Guice - What exactly makes you interested in Guice? As far as I know (but I haven't taken a look in Guice for some time already, so I can be wrong), Tapestry-IoC does (almost) everything Guice does, but better. One of the reasons is that T-IoC needs no annotations in your beans. :) -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Desenvolvedor, Instrutor e Consultor de Tecnologia Eteg Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. http://www.eteg.com.br - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [T5] Problem with multiple forms in a loop
I didn't see Olof's original post, but this is what the PREPARE event is for.
Use it to set up the object that is being edited using the form context.
Also, note that there is a limitation with form validation. From the docs:
- tracker
- org.apache.tapestry.ValidationTracker
- defaultTracker
- prop
- The object which will record user input and validation errors. The object
must be persistent between requests (since the form submission and validation
occurs in an component event request and the subsequent render occurs in a
render request). The default is a persistent property of the Form component
and this is sufficient for nearly all purposes
__ (except when a Form is rendered inside a loop). __
Cheers,
Nick.
Angelo Chen wrote:
Hi,
oic, maybe an ajax will do? I am thinking of providing a hidden form, when
user click a link in one record, it will insert the hidden form below the
selected row for user to edit, then submit it via an ajax call and close the
form, not yet tried.
A.C.
quot;Olof =?UTF-8?Q?N=C3=A6ss=C3=A9nquot; ?= wrote:
I'm afraid not. I ended up with enclosing all users in one big form. I
thought it wasn't worth solving when the one form approach worked just
fine in my case.
/Olof
On 29/10/2007, Angelo Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Olof,
Did you find a solution to this? I have similar need as yours this time.
A.C.
Olof =?UTF-8?Q?N=C3=A6ss=C3=A9n ?= wrote:
I have a problem with using forms in components where the data model
is passed to the components via parameter inside a T5 loop component.
When a form is submitted the data model seems to be lost.
What I'm trying to do is to iterate through a collection of users and
construct a form for each user where a user name can be edited. Each
form resides in a component that handles submission. The user model
data is passed to the component inside a page where a loop loops
through a collection of users. The idea is to have a form for each
user so when submitting a form, only the user edited will get updated.
However, when a form is submitted the user data model is lost and ends
up as a null pointer.
I wouldn't be surprised if I've missed something obvious or if the way
I try to achieve a form for each user isn't a valid usage of T5. Any
thoughts or suggestions? I've attached a simple example demonstrating
my approach in this email.
/Olof
// User.java Data Model
package org.example;
public class User
{
private String name;
public User(String name)
{
this.name = name;
}
public String getName()
{
return name;
}
public void setName(String name)
{
this.name = name;
}
}
//Users.java T5 Page
package org.example.testapp.pages;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import org.apache.tapestry.annotations.Persist;
import org.example.User;
public class Users
{
private User user;
@Persist(flash)
private ListUser users;
public void onActivate()
{
if (users == null)
{
users = new ArrayListUser();
users.add(new User(Ted));
users.add(new User(Olof));
}
}
public User getUser()
{
return user;
}
public void setUser(User user)
{
this.user = user;
}
public ListUser getUsers()
{
return users;
}
}
// Users.html T5 Template
html xmlns:t=http://tapestry.apache.org/schema/tapestry_5_0_0.xsd;
head
/head
body
t:loop source=users value=user
t:edituser user=user/
/t:loop
/body
/html
//EditUser.java T5 Component
package org.example.testapp.components;
import org.apache.tapestry.annotations.Parameter;
import org.example.User;
public class EditUser
{
@Parameter(required = true)
private User user;
public void setUser(User user)
{
this.user = user;
}
public User getUser()
{
return user;
}
public void onSuccess()
{
// save user
}
}
//EditUser.html T5 Template
t:form xmlns:t=http://tapestry.apache.org/schema/tapestry_5_0_0.xsd;
t:textfield value=user.name/br/
t:submit t:id=save value=save/
/t:form
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-T5--Problem-with-multiple-forms-in-a-loop-tf4533944.html#a13467431
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Re: Mixing T5 and Guice --- best practices
This is almost a FAQ. See the older post here: http://tapestryjava.blogspot.com/search?q=guice Also see the Why Not ... sections: http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tapestry-ioc/ Cheers, Nick. Jan Vissers wrote: On the why of Guice... Not trying to offend anyone here, but maybe T5 already could have been finished if instead of writing yet another IoC framework the choice was made to adopt an elegant one. https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180postID=563902125495823741 Bob Lee: If you want to know why Guice is so popular, the best advice I can give is, try it. Who knows? You might decide to lobby for a couple new features and adopt it, in which case you could spend more time on your web framework. Given the fact that Guice already had a major influence on T5, it is still not quite clear to me why T5 IoC exists. But then again - I'm just a simple developer waiting for the next great version of *the web framework*. -J. On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:28:33 -0200, Jan Vissers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Partially inspired by a question/some work by Leon Pennings (on this list), partially because of my interest in Guice - What exactly makes you interested in Guice? As far as I know (but I haven't taken a look in Guice for some time already, so I can be wrong), Tapestry-IoC does (almost) everything Guice does, but better. One of the reasons is that T-IoC needs no annotations in your beans. :) -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Desenvolvedor, Instrutor e Consultor de Tecnologia Eteg Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. http://www.eteg.com.br - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mixing T5 and Guice --- best practices
Jan, forgot to add I know you saw this last time around. ;-) Cheers, Nick. Jan Vissers wrote: On the why of Guice... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: T5 book: update
Well, I *wish* wholeheartedly to continue with them, but at the moment, that's just not possible. Writing a whole new book in just about three months while working full time isn't a piece of cake ;) I used to think that as soon as I complete the book I will return to the T4 tutorials, but now, looking ahead, I see yet another book on Tapestry 5 emerging at the horizon... So many important topics weren't covered in the first book! Does someone know a hack to increase the number of hours in a day? At least to 72 please! -Original Message- From: Chris Chiappone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 October 2007 19:02 To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: T5 book: update Are you finished with the devsheld articles for tap 4.1? On 10/29/07, Kolesnikov, Alexander GNI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sure! As soon as it is ready. -Original Message- From: Howard Lewis Ship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 October 2007 15:00 To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: T5 book: update My personal email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Surely, you'd just send me a PDF at this stage? On 10/29/07, Kolesnikov, Alexander GNI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Ted! I am updating chapter 5 now, and it will have a section on this component. -Original Message- From: Ted Steen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 October 2007 18:33 To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: T5 book: update ah, i`ll have a look at that in the weekend. it is an easy thing to add. 2007/10/26, Kolesnikov, Alexander GNI [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thanks Ted, I know that. By the way, did you have a chance to add another toolbar configuration to FCKEditor component? -Original Message- From: Ted Steen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 October 2007 11:00 To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: T5 book: update Very nice! Dont forget to update the part about the DatePicker. It is now obsolete. T5.0.6 now includes a DateField as a part of the core. 2007/10/26, Kolesnikov, Alexander GNI [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Just to let you know: the first draft of the book is completed, the external revewing is almost completed, I am currently upgrading the chapters to 5.0.6 with the deadline of 15 November. If everything goes well, the book should hit the shelves in December. Cheers, Alexander -- -- -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown. This email transmission may contain confidential information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is intended even if addressed incorrectly. Please delete it from your files if you are not the intended recipient. Thank you for your compliance. Copyright 2007 CIGNA == == == == == -- /ted -- -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown. This email transmission may contain confidential information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is intended even if addressed incorrectly. Please delete it from your files if you are not the intended recipient. Thank you for your compliance. Copyright 2007 CIGNA == == == -- -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- /ted - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown. This email transmission may contain confidential information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is intended even if addressed incorrectly. Please delete it from your files if you are not the intended recipient. Thank you for your compliance. Copyright 2007 CIGNA
RE: T5: FCKEditor Component (fix for 5.0.6, medium toolbar set added)
Great, thanks Ted! -Original Message- From: Ted Steen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 October 2007 21:53 To: Tapestry users Subject: T5: FCKEditor Component (fix for 5.0.6, medium toolbar set added) Small update for tapestry5-fckeditor ahead, http://code.google.com/p/tapestry5-fckeditor/downloads/list * Now works with T5.0.6 * Added medium toolbar set Have fun! -- /Ted - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown. This email transmission may contain confidential information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is intended even if addressed incorrectly. Please delete it from your files if you are not the intended recipient. Thank you for your compliance. Copyright 2007 CIGNA == - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tapestry and workflow engines, suggestions?
Hi, just wanted to know your experiences, is there any integration stuff already done with any existing workflow engince? I'd prefer a lightwait webflow engine at the moment jbpm and even spring webflow could be too much for me but I'm open for suggestions. We are using tapestry4.1.2. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T5: Enum localization no longer working in 5.0.6 and BeanEditForm?
I'm just starting with T5 and did my first experiments with 5.0.5 and now upgraded to 5.0.6. I used Howards tutorial, and as far as I can remember, the localization of Enums inside BeanEditForm just worked. But now with version 5.0.6 it seems no longer to work. Anything changed in configuration of localization of Enums? I also have a Grid component that displays the data from the BeanEditForm, inside the Grid the localization of Enums works just great (so it is not a problem with my .properties file I think) Thanks, Max
Re: T5: Issues contributing a coercion?
Thanks again, Howard! On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 19:32 -0700, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: Create an interface for your page, make sure the interface is not in the .pages. package, have the page implement the interface, do the coversion in terms of the interface. It's tricky class loader issues, the EditPgaeModelImpl class known to your services layer is literally not the same class as the one Tapestry uses to instantiate your page (once it gets down rewriting it to fit in with Tapestry's runtime model). On 10/29/07, Andy Huhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm attempting to contribute a coercion. This is the first time I've attempted to , so I could be missing something obvious...but the error message I receive makes me think there's something else going on. As you can see below, I'm attempting to coerce from com.homeed.pages.EditPageModelImpl to com.homeed.pages.PageModel. It says that coercion isn't available...however, look halfway through the available list...this very coercion is listed! Am I missing something obvious? Thanks, Andy Failure reading parameter pageModel of component account/Edit:layout: Could not find a coercion from type com.homeed.pages.EditPageModelImpl to type com.homeed.pages.PageModel. Available coercions: Double -- Float, Float -- Double, Long -- Boolean, Long -- Byte, Long -- Double, Long -- Integer, Long -- Short, Number -- Long, Object -- String, Object -- java.util.List, Object[] -- java.util.List, String -- Boolean, String -- Double, String -- Long, String -- java.io.File, String -- java.math.BigDecimal, String -- java.math.BigInteger, String -- java.util.regex.Pattern, String -- org.apache.tapestry.SelectModel, String -- org.apache.tapestry.corelib.data.GridPagerPosition, boolean[] -- java.util.List, byte[] -- java.util.List, char[] -- java.util.List, com.homeed.pages.EditPageModelImpl -- com.homeed.pages.PageModel, double[] -- java.util.List, float[] -- java.util.List, int[] -- java.util.List, java.math.BigDecimal -- Double, java.util.Collection -- Boolean, java.util.List -- org.apache.tapestry.SelectModel, java.util.List -- org.apache.tapestry.grid.GridDataSource, java.util.Map -- org.apache.tapestry.SelectModel, long[] -- java.util.List, null -- Boolean, null -- Double, null -- Long, null -- String, null -- java.math.BigDecimal, null -- java.math.BigInteger, null -- java.util.List, null -- org.apache.tapestry.grid.GridDataSource, org.apache.tapestry.runtime.ComponentResourcesAware -- org.apache.tapestry.ComponentResources, short[] -- java.util.List. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: non-Session Object for From Submission
Hi devs,
thanks for your replies
i am already doing some thing like this in pageBeginRender
public void pageBeginRender(PageEvent event) {
if (event.getRequestCycle().isRewinding()) {
return;
}
if(getUSERINFO () == null){
setUSERINFO (new USERINFO(1,ABC,XYZ));
}
}
but error:
target is null for setProperty(null, zip, null)
remians there if i persist USERINFO in session its OK, but i think in
normal JSP application we need not to persist Whole form content in session,
session just need to use for some long retainable info.
any idea from you will be helpfull for me.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/non-Session-Object-for-From-Submission-tf4712531.html#a13487603
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: non-Session Object for From Submission
zaxeer schrieb:
Hi devs,
thanks for your replies
i am already doing some thing like this in pageBeginRender
public void pageBeginRender(PageEvent event) {
if (event.getRequestCycle().isRewinding()) {
return;
}
if(getUSERINFO () == null){
setUSERINFO (new USERINFO(1,ABC,XYZ));
}
}
but error:
target is null for setProperty(null, zip, null)
remians there if i persist USERINFO in session its OK, but i think in
normal JSP application we need not to persist Whole form content in session,
session just need to use for some long retainable info.
any idea from you will be helpfull for me.
I don't know exactly how AjaxForm works but it might be that it rewinds
the form on submission so with that code your USERINFO object won't be
set to a non-null value.
Also have a look at the client:page persistence scope. That way you can
persist the object on the client side as long as the user stays on the
same page.
Uli
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help out Matt Raible: Looking for Web Framework Stories
Howard Lewis Ship wrote: Matt Raible is looking for stories of how people chose a JVM Web Framework and how it worked out for them. I'd encourage all Tapestry users to drop in with a story or two. http://raibledesigns.com/rd/entry/choosing_a_jvm_web_framework1 I reply to this old post to signal that the presentation of Matt Raible is available, and there is some good reference to Tapestr on it : http://raibledesigns.com/rd/entry/choosing_a_jvm_web_framework2 Direct link to the presentation PDF : http://static.raibledesigns.com/repository/presentations/ChoosingAJVMWebFramework-CSS2007.pdf En,joy ! -- Francois Armand Etudes Développements J2EE Groupe Linagora - http://www.linagora.com Tél.: +33 (0)1 58 18 68 28 --- InterLDAP - http://interldap.org FederID - http://www.federid.org/ Open Source identities management and federation - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T5: Tapestry-Hibernate, do we have to save()?
Hi,
I have a class like this:
Long id;
Photo photo;
@Inject
private Session _session;
public void setId(Long id) {
this.id = id;
}
public Class onActivate() {
photo = (Photo) _session.get(Photo.class, id);
return null;
}
public String getCaption() {
return photo.getCaption();
}
public void setCaption(String caption) {
this.photo.setCaption(caption);
}
when I click submit from the form, changes are saved to the database. I used
to do
onSuccess()
{
_session.save(myrecord);
}
is this really needed? I got confused, why the changes are saved without
calling _session.save()?
Thanks,
A.C.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/T5%3A-Tapestry-Hibernate%2C-do-we-have-to-save%28%29--tf4718363.html#a13488286
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help out Matt Raible: Looking for Web Framework Stories
On Oct 30, 2007 2:09 PM, Francois Armand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I reply to this old post to signal that the presentation of Matt Raible is available, and there is some good reference to Tapestr on it : Some quotes and emphasis are a little somewhat misleading by my point of view, but it's a fair presentation and a good reference. It really gives the idea of what the process of building apps, web apps, in the java world is. Bookmarked, thanks for posting . -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T5: Persist or not? help me understand this
Hi,
I got a little confused with need to @Persist, example as follow, the usrID
as not persisted, but when user Submit a form, that value is still
accessible inside OnSuccess, my understanding is, after rendering the page,
the variable is gone, when form submitted, only persisted variable retains
their value, any help on clarifying this question? Thanks,
A.C.
public class EditPhoto {
Long usrID;
public Long getUsrID() {
return usrID;
}
public void setUsrID(Long usrID) {
this.usrID = usrID;
}
Object onSuccess() {
System.out.println(getUsrID());
return resources.createPageLink(... );
}
above page is invoked by the following code
@InjectPage
private EditPhoto editPhoto;
Object onActionFromEdit(Long id)
editPhoto.setUsrID(currentUser.getId());
return editPhoto;
}
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/T5%3A-Persist-or-not--help-me-understand-this-tf4718768.html#a13489653
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T5: Tapestry-Hibernate, do we have to save()?
On 10/30/07, Angelo Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is this really needed? I got confused, why the changes are saved without calling _session.save()? Angelo, this is default hibernate behaviour. See: http://www.hibernate.org/hib_docs/v3/reference/en/html/objectstate.html#objectstate-modifying However, your post brings up an interesting question: will the object's state be persisted even after validation fails? My first guess is might actually be a problem. Consider: 1. Object is retrieved in onAttached() and associated with a new session, 2. Fields are updated with values from the form submission (lets assume they are valid), 3. Some cross-validation fails in onValidate() - so onSuccess() is never called, but... 4. As the thread cleans up, the HibernateSessionManager commits the transaction anyway and the invalid values are persisted! I'd like to test this and look around the lists a bit but am throwing this out in case others have thoughts. Cheers, lasitha. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T5 book: update
Shut-eye is a waste of time :) On 10/30/07, Kolesnikov, Alexander GNI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does someone know a hack to increase the number of hours in a day? At least to 72 please!
AW: T5: Tapestry-Hibernate, do we have to save()?
Oh yes, this is really a problem we actually had in a Tapestry 4 Application. We had to use (ugly) DTO Objects to avoid this problem. As far as I can remember, this problem is addressed in JSF with its complex render cycle. Values are stored in intermediate objects until validation is completed and only then are copied to the bean data object. Would be interesting if there could be a similar soultion for T5? Max -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: lasitha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Oktober 2007 15:29 An: Tapestry users Betreff: Re: T5: Tapestry-Hibernate, do we have to save()? On 10/30/07, Angelo Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is this really needed? I got confused, why the changes are saved without calling _session.save()? Angelo, this is default hibernate behaviour. See: http://www.hibernate.org/hib_docs/v3/reference/en/html/objects tate.html#objectstate-modifying However, your post brings up an interesting question: will the object's state be persisted even after validation fails? My first guess is might actually be a problem. Consider: 1. Object is retrieved in onAttached() and associated with a new session, 2. Fields are updated with values from the form submission (lets assume they are valid), 3. Some cross-validation fails in onValidate() - so onSuccess() is never called, but... 4. As the thread cleans up, the HibernateSessionManager commits the transaction anyway and the invalid values are persisted! I'd like to test this and look around the lists a bit but am throwing this out in case others have thoughts. Cheers, lasitha. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T5: Tapestry-Hibernate, do we have to save()?
Hi Lasitha, Your thoughts do require some thinking, I'm doing a site now that is not so critical in the consistency of the data, as it's merely a simple membership database, but if this is to replace a c/s biz application, this will be a issue, is the current Tapestry - hibernate ready for that? what we need to do in that kind of situation? I asked last time but it was considered a hibernate issue, I like to hear from others too how they manage situations like this? thanks. A.C. lasitha wrote: On 10/30/07, Angelo Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is this really needed? I got confused, why the changes are saved without calling _session.save()? Angelo, this is default hibernate behaviour. See: http://www.hibernate.org/hib_docs/v3/reference/en/html/objectstate.html#objectstate-modifying However, your post brings up an interesting question: will the object's state be persisted even after validation fails? My first guess is might actually be a problem. Consider: 1. Object is retrieved in onAttached() and associated with a new session, 2. Fields are updated with values from the form submission (lets assume they are valid), 3. Some cross-validation fails in onValidate() - so onSuccess() is never called, but... 4. As the thread cleans up, the HibernateSessionManager commits the transaction anyway and the invalid values are persisted! I'd like to test this and look around the lists a bit but am throwing this out in case others have thoughts. Cheers, lasitha. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/T5%3A-Tapestry-Hibernate%2C-do-we-have-to-save%28%29--tf4718363.html#a13490149 Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: T5: Tapestry-Hibernate, do we have to save()?
My more complicated work has been with T4, but this should still apply. I use Spring and Hibernate, with all of the Spring transaction management and the Open Session In View interceptor. When I find() an object, I do it declared READONLY. As all of the properties are updated from the form, it *looks* like everything is changing, but after the cycle completes, all changes are rolled back. If everything works, then I invoke a persist() that will commit to the database. -Original Message- From: Angelo Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 10:58 AM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: Re: T5: Tapestry-Hibernate, do we have to save()? Hi Lasitha, Your thoughts do require some thinking, I'm doing a site now that is not so critical in the consistency of the data, as it's merely a simple membership database, but if this is to replace a c/s biz application, this will be a issue, is the current Tapestry - hibernate ready for that? what we need to do in that kind of situation? I asked last time but it was considered a hibernate issue, I like to hear from others too how they manage situations like this? thanks. A.C. lasitha wrote: On 10/30/07, Angelo Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is this really needed? I got confused, why the changes are saved without calling _session.save()? Angelo, this is default hibernate behaviour. See: http://www.hibernate.org/hib_docs/v3/reference/en/html/objectstate.html#ob jectstate-modifying However, your post brings up an interesting question: will the object's state be persisted even after validation fails? My first guess is might actually be a problem. Consider: 1. Object is retrieved in onAttached() and associated with a new session, 2. Fields are updated with values from the form submission (lets assume they are valid), 3. Some cross-validation fails in onValidate() - so onSuccess() is never called, but... 4. As the thread cleans up, the HibernateSessionManager commits the transaction anyway and the invalid values are persisted! I'd like to test this and look around the lists a bit but am throwing this out in case others have thoughts. Cheers, lasitha. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/T5%3A-Tapestry- Hibernate%2C-do-we-have-to-save%28%29--tf4718363.html#a13490149 Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mixing T5 and Guice --- best practices
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:52:42 -0200, Jan Vissers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exactly - and to me T5 IoC looks/is very closely related to T5 the web application framework, whereas Guice seems more general purpose. I beg to differ. :) T5-IoC was made to be the Tapestry 5 IoC container, but it is as general purpose as any other. ;) The only differences is that Tapestry 5-IoC is used natively by Tapestry 5. -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Desenvolvedor, Instrutor e Consultor de Tecnologia Eteg Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. http://www.eteg.com.br - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mixing T5 and Guice --- best practices
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:08:20 -0200, Jan Vissers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A different question. If I would chose to use Guice as IoC and T5 IoC simply as a bridge into Guice - which part(s) of T5 as a web app framework would I be unable to use? AFAIK, none. Of course, Howard can answer this question better than me. :) -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Desenvolvedor, Instrutor e Consultor de Tecnologia Eteg Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. http://www.eteg.com.br - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T5: ActionLink with two parameter context
You can return a Link instead of the Class with the context containing your
id. Use the ComponentResources to create the link.
On 10/29/07, Angelo Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I redirect to another page in my ActionLink using following code:
Class onActionFromEdit(Long id)
{
return EditPage.class;
}
this works, now I'd like to pass the id as well to the EditPage so that
its
OnActivate(Long id) will be called, how to do this? thanks.
A.C.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/T5%3A-ActionLink-with-two-parameter-context-tf4716250.html#a13482053
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
TheDailyTube.com. Sign up and get the best new videos on the internet
delivered fresh to your inbox.
Ajax loop problem
Hi,
I'm having a problem updating a single item within a For loop.
Home.html:
div jwcid=@For source=ognl:testList value=ognl:testListItem
table jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tr
tha jwcid=@DirectLink
listener=listener:updateTestListItem parameters=ognl:testListItem
updateComponents=wrapper href=#Click!/a/th
/tr
trtdspan jwcid=@Insert
value=ognl:testListItemTEST/span/td/tr
/table
/div
Home.java:
public abstract String[] getTestList();
public abstract void setTestList(String[] list);
public abstract String getTestListItem();
public abstract void setTestListItem(String item);
public void updateTestListItem(String item) {
setTestListItem(item + CHANGED!);
}
public void pageBeginRender(PageEvent event) {
setTestList(new String[] { a, b, c, d });
}
When the page first loads, everything looks fine (4 tables, with ids
wrapper, wrapper_0, wrapper_1, and wrapper_2, containing a, b, c, and
d). When I click one of the links, I get an ajax-response back like:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC
-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd; [
!ENTITY nbsp '#160;'
]
ajax-responseresponse id=wrapper type=elementtable id=wrapper
tr
tha id=DirectLink
href=/j2ee/TestTapApp/app?component=%24DirectLinkamp;page=Home
amp;service=directamp;sp=Saamp;updateParts=wrapper onclick=return
tapestry.linkOnClick(this.href
,'DirectLink', false)Click!/a/th
/tr
trtda/td/tr
/table/response/ajax-response
The text has not been updated to a CHANGED!. What am I doing wrong?
I'm using Tapestry 4.1.3.
Thanks,
Jesse Merriman
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mixing T5 and Guice --- best practices
Please, please don't 'shoot' me - but if this is the case what would be a reason for me to use T5 IoC, other that for injecting stuff into page classes? Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo wrote: On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:08:20 -0200, Jan Vissers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A different question. If I would chose to use Guice as IoC and T5 IoC simply as a bridge into Guice - which part(s) of T5 as a web app framework would I be unable to use? AFAIK, none. Of course, Howard can answer this question better than me. :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mixing T5 and Guice --- best practices
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:45:26 -0200, Jan Vissers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please, please don't 'shoot' me - but if this is the case what would be a reason for me to use T5 IoC, other that for injecting stuff into page classes? Don't forget Tapestry IoC is a general purpose IoC container. ;) We won't shoot you or anybody else if you come with good arguments. :) I couldn't figure out yet what are the features you want from the IoC container. If I did, I could help you more than just saying T5 IoC rules!. :) And don't forget to read the Why not X sections in http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tapestry-ioc/. -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Desenvolvedor, Instrutor e Consultor de Tecnologia Eteg Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. http://www.eteg.com.br - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Honeycomb project
Hi, The Honeycomb project is closed? I can't access to http://honeycomb.javaforge.com/ website. Any info from this project? It is moved somewhere? Best regards, Stef - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T5: Multiple onActivate?
Hi all, It appears that onActivate() cannot be overloaded in a single page class. I'm hoping I just missed something and that conclusion is wrong. If not, how are others handling URLs like: news/43 (43 = DB ID) new/breaking-story (breaking-story=slug) I'd like to avoid a single onActivate() that takes an Object. So, any help would be much appreciated. Thanks, Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T5 page without a class (only a template)
That's unfortunate. In T4 you could map multiple templates to a single class or have no class at all. It was quite nice and I'm unaware of any projects that suffered as a result. To me, being a Web application framework, the class should complement the page, providing the server side logic as necessary. If not necessary, you shouldn't need to have empty artifacts kicking around. C'est la vie, I suppose. -- Kevin On 10/27/07 11:36 AM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Westgate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No. The class defines the page. This is implicit in the design. The alternatives are a slippery slope to configuration complexity. Cheers, Nick. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: T5: Multiple onActivate?
For this use-case, I would suggest taking a string. If it matches a regex (like a number pattern), then cast and do a db-lookup. Otherwise, do whatever else you want to do. Or you can use something like news/lookup/43 and news/breaking/breaking-story to be more explicit. -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Menard Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:26 PM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: T5: Multiple onActivate? Hi all, It appears that onActivate() cannot be overloaded in a single page class. I'm hoping I just missed something and that conclusion is wrong. If not, how are others handling URLs like: news/43 (43 = DB ID) new/breaking-story (breaking-story=slug) I'd like to avoid a single onActivate() that takes an Object. So, any help would be much appreciated. Thanks, Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T5: Multiple onActivate?
Hmm . . . Okay, that's what I was afraid of. Unfortunately, it's a port of an existing app, so I'd like to preserve URL structure if possible. I supposed URLRewrite could do the trick. As a follow-up question, is there anyway to do the following: orders/43 (DB ID, caught through onActivate()) orders/latest (specified in com.example.www.pages.orders.Latest) It looks like Tapestry will still try to pass latest through to com.example.www.pages.Orders. I also couldn't figure out how to have a Start class for each package, so that the first URL would actually map to com.example.www.pages.orders.Start. Is that doable, or do I have to work around it as well? Thanks, Kevin On 10/30/07 3:54 PM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jonathan Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For this use-case, I would suggest taking a string. If it matches a regex (like a number pattern), then cast and do a db-lookup. Otherwise, do whatever else you want to do. Or you can use something like news/lookup/43 and news/breaking/breaking-story to be more explicit. -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Menard Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:26 PM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: T5: Multiple onActivate? Hi all, It appears that onActivate() cannot be overloaded in a single page class. I'm hoping I just missed something and that conclusion is wrong. If not, how are others handling URLs like: news/43 (43 = DB ID) new/breaking-story (breaking-story=slug) I'd like to avoid a single onActivate() that takes an Object. So, any help would be much appreciated. Thanks, Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T5 page without a class (only a template)
Hi Kevin, It's not implemented yet. But your java class could be very simple. Marcus
Re: T5: Multiple onActivate?
Hi Kevin, Maybe this help http://tapestryjava.blogspot.com/2007/08/handling-direct-urls-in-tapestry-5.html Marcus
Re: T5: Multiple onActivate?
That did help a bit. At least I know how multiple onActivate can work if I need a variable number of context values. Unfortunately, it doesn't address when you have the same number, but different type. Likewise, I still haven't seen how to render to index pages inside subpackages. -- Kevin On 10/30/07 4:12 PM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Kevin, Maybe this help http://tapestryjava.blogspot.com/2007/08/handling-direct-urls-in-tapestry-5.ht ml Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T5: how to pass a component as a parameter? -- getting unbound errors
a quick background first: I'm creating a component which can display a 'list
of lists'. For flexibility I want to implement this as a composite-pattern
in which a CompositeFlexList-component can render one or more
FlexList-components as it's childs. (CompositeFlexList extends FlexList).
This works well when I define the list-component as @Component in the
CompositeFlexList-component.
However for flexibility I need to extract the FlexList-component-definition
from the CompositeFlexList-component and define it in an enclosing page.
So want i want is this:
page
|[EMAIL PROTECTED](..some config here.,childlist=childlist)
CompositeFlexList
list;
|[EMAIL PROTECTED](some config here) FlexList childlist;
Now CompositeFlexList has the following definition:
@Parameter
private FlexList childlist;
public FlexList getChildlist() {return childlist;}
My problem/question:
although component childlist is entirely defined in the enclosing page, and
this component is bound (???) to field childlist in the CompositeFlexList I
keep getting an unbound error, see below.
Am I missing something, or is it impossible to pass a defined
component-instance as a parameter to another component?
Thanks in advance,
Geert-Jan
/
Parameter(s) results are required for
com.wrappt.test.tap5springstry.components.FlexList, but have not been bound.
location
classpath:path_removed/CompositeFlexList.html, line 4, column 43
1 div class=${rowClass}
xmlns:t=http://tapestry.apache.org/schema/tapestry_5_0_0.xsd;
2 t:body/
3 t:block t:id=childblock
4 div t:type=flexlist t:id=childlist
5 /div
6 /t:block
7 /div
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/T5%3A-how-to-pass-a-component-as-a-parameter%3E-getting-unbound-errors-tf4721073.html#a13497068
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T5: How to upgrade from 5.0.5 to 5.0.6
Hi,
Still having major problems upgrading to 5.0.6. I was hoping this would be
a little less painful than having to create a whole new project...
I have:
- changed the tapestry version to 5.0.6 in pom.xml
- changed the log4j version to 1.2.14 in pom.xml
- renamed all *.html files to *.tml
- moved *.tml (and *.properties ?) from src/main/resources/org/app/pages to
src/main/webapp/WEB-INF (is this the right place??)
- fixed compilation problems by importing
org.apache.tapestry.ioc.annotations.Inject
- changed the method signature in AppModule.java to:
public RequestFilter buildTimingFilter(final Logger log)
- also in AppModule.java: import org.slf4j.Logger
Now I get:
HTTP ERROR: 500
org.apache.log4j.Logger.isTraceEnabled()Z
RequestURI=/app/
Powered by Jetty://
and in the console, I see a lot of:
Caused by: org.apache.tapestry.ioc.internal.util.TapestryException:
Component Start does not contain an embedded component with id 'login'.
... which is odd, because my Start.tml file has a:
t:form t:id=login
in it, which implies to me that maybe it isn't finding the Start.tml file at
all?
Any hints?
Thanks again,
Marc
- Original Message -
From: Nick Westgate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 03:52
Subject: Re: upgrading 5.0.5 to 5.0.6 breaks the app
Please look for the recent thread T5: How to upgrade from 5.0.5 to
5.0.6.
Cheers,
Nick.
Marc A. Donis wrote:
Hi again,
First off, I am having an issue (with 5.0.5) concerning returning null
from my ValueEncoder's toValue method. I expect the value to be simply
set to null, but instead I get the message:
Coercion of null to type java.lang.Integer (via null -- String,
String -- Long, Long -- Integer) failed: null
when I select --- (i.e., null) in my select component. Here is the
ValueEncoder code I am using:
private static final ValueEncoderInteger integerValueEncoder = new
ValueEncoderInteger() {
@Override
public String toClient(Integer i) {
if (i == null)
return null;
return String.valueOf(i);
}
@Override
public Integer toValue(String str) {
if (str == null || str.length() == 0 || str.equals(---))
return null;// *** crashes after doing this ***
return Integer.parseInt(str);
}
};
My SelectModel uses the string --- to represent no selection.
I read something ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1648 )
which led me to believe that this problem was fixed in 5.0.6, so I
upgraded my vesion
After changing my imports of Inject to
org.apache.tapestry.annotations.ioc.Inject (instead of
org.apache.tapestry.annotations.Inject), 5.0.6 now causes this error
immediately on load of Start:
HTTP ERROR: 500
Internal Server Error
RequestURI=/app/
Powered by Jetty://
and all I see in the console is:
0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1 - - [28/Oct/2007:17:06:02 +0100] GET /app/ HTTP/1.1 500
1245 http://localhost:8080/; Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0;
en-US; rv:1.8.1.8) Gecko/20071008 Firefox/2.0.0.8 -
which is not terribly helpful.
I'm at a bit of a loss here. Why is 5.0.6 failing so dramatically? And
am I doing something wrong with my encoder, or is this really the bug I
think it is?
tia,
Marc
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T5: How to upgrade from 5.0.5 to 5.0.6
Marc A. Donis wrote: - moved *.tml (and *.properties ?) from src/main/resources/org/app/pages to src/main/webapp/WEB-INF (is this the right place??) You pages should be in src/main/webapp - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T5: How to upgrade from 5.0.5 to 5.0.6
Yep, I just figured that out... thanks! Also, it is necessary (as mentioned in the [5.0.6-SNAPSHOT] Bug? isTraceEnabled missing when I switch to slf4j thread) to replace log4j-1.2.8.jar with log4j-1.2.14.jar in the jetty/ext dir. Now things seem to be working again. Thanks again for the help. Marc - Original Message - From: Lindsay Steele [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 22:37 Subject: Re: T5: How to upgrade from 5.0.5 to 5.0.6 Marc A. Donis wrote: - moved *.tml (and *.properties ?) from src/main/resources/org/app/pages to src/main/webapp/WEB-INF (is this the right place??) You pages should be in src/main/webapp - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T5 page without a class (only a template)
There was a project which suffered, and that was spindle. One of the big reasons Geoff gave up trying to add support for T4 to spindle was due to the template/class mismatch. Robert On Oct 30, 2007, at 10/302:31 PM , Kevin Menard wrote: That's unfortunate. In T4 you could map multiple templates to a single class or have no class at all. It was quite nice and I'm unaware of any projects that suffered as a result. To me, being a Web application framework, the class should complement the page, providing the server side logic as necessary. If not necessary, you shouldn't need to have empty artifacts kicking around. C'est la vie, I suppose. -- Kevin On 10/27/07 11:36 AM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED] planning.co.jp, Nick Westgate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No. The class defines the page. This is implicit in the design. The alternatives are a slippery slope to configuration complexity. Cheers, Nick. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T5 page without a class (only a template)
Heh, I conveniently ignored that. I should have stated that I'm unaware of any Web project that suffered. While unfortunate that Spindle died, as it turned out, it wasn't as necessary for T4 as it was for T3. Likewise, other apps, like HandyTapestry demonstrated that with a different scope, a good plugin could still be accomplished. The net of it is that I'd rather not see it simpler for tools at the price of making it harder to do by hand. That leads to the requirement of tools that don't exist yet. -- Kevin On 10/30/07 5:48 PM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert Zeigler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There was a project which suffered, and that was spindle. One of the big reasons Geoff gave up trying to add support for T4 to spindle was due to the template/class mismatch. Robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T5: How to upgrade from 5.0.5 to 5.0.6
I've kept my .tml and .properties files in the resources folder which get put into the jar file along side the classes. Is there any value to moving them to the webapp folder? Josh On 10/30/07, Marc A. Donis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yep, I just figured that out... thanks! Also, it is necessary (as mentioned in the [5.0.6-SNAPSHOT] Bug? isTraceEnabled missing when I switch to slf4j thread) to replace log4j-1.2.8.jar with log4j-1.2.14.jar in the jetty/ext dir. Now things seem to be working again. Thanks again for the help. Marc - Original Message - From: Lindsay Steele [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 22:37 Subject: Re: T5: How to upgrade from 5.0.5 to 5.0.6 Marc A. Donis wrote: - moved *.tml (and *.properties ?) from src/main/resources/org/app/pages to src/main/webapp/WEB-INF (is this the right place??) You pages should be in src/main/webapp - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- TheDailyTube.com. Sign up and get the best new videos on the internet delivered fresh to your inbox.
Re: url-rewriting in Tapestry 5
You could use urlrewritefilter to rewrite both inbound and outbound URLs. But for outbound URLs rewriting, urlrewritefilter could only rewrite URLs encoded by HttpServletResponse.encodeURL() method. I believe most URLs generated by Tapestry components(so far only confirmed BeanEditForm) are using this method. Cheers, Jeffrey Ai Britske wrote: Thanks these all seem valid approaches. What i'm looking for is a stretching the possibilities i guess but here it goes anyway: I want a way in which I can plug a 'rewrite strategy'. This means that not only I have to translate urls from 'nice' to 'tapestry5' -internal but also the other way around, so that tapestry-pages reference other pages automatically by their 'nice' -url. I would like to keep the code in 1 place for making this bidirectional-translation. Doing this with mode_rewrite does't give me control in code I think. I wonder if this is possible using some form of rewrite-filter, that is able to translate both ways. any ideas on this? regards, Geert-Jan Robin Helgelin wrote: On 9/21/07, Daniel Leffel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I went down this path and decided that mod_rewrite is a much cleaner way to achieve something like this. Or maybe an urlfilter bundled with your war, there are a few usable ones. -- regards, Robin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/url-rewriting-in-Tapestry-5-tf4496726.html#a13500030 Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: T5: Multiple onActivate?
I don't know. There have been some threads and I think JIRA issues over the months on similar topics. They revolve around making Tapestry URL's friendly, and the logic involved in having something like Order/EditOrder reduced down to order/edit, and dealing with cases when the package name is the same as the page name, or even worse, if a parameter looks like a page name. A search for those threads and issues might give you some ideas. Are you just trying to preserve bookmarks? Is this something where you really need to code the logic to cope with the old URL's while migrating to a new URL scheme? Jon -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Menard Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:58 PM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: Re: T5: Multiple onActivate? Hmm . . . Okay, that's what I was afraid of. Unfortunately, it's a port of an existing app, so I'd like to preserve URL structure if possible. I supposed URLRewrite could do the trick. As a follow-up question, is there anyway to do the following: orders/43 (DB ID, caught through onActivate()) orders/latest (specified in com.example.www.pages.orders.Latest) It looks like Tapestry will still try to pass latest through to com.example.www.pages.Orders. I also couldn't figure out how to have a Start class for each package, so that the first URL would actually map to com.example.www.pages.orders.Start. Is that doable, or do I have to work around it as well? Thanks, Kevin On 10/30/07 3:54 PM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jonathan Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For this use-case, I would suggest taking a string. If it matches a regex (like a number pattern), then cast and do a db-lookup. Otherwise, do whatever else you want to do. Or you can use something like news/lookup/43 and news/breaking/breaking-story to be more explicit. -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Menard Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:26 PM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: T5: Multiple onActivate? Hi all, It appears that onActivate() cannot be overloaded in a single page class. I'm hoping I just missed something and that conclusion is wrong. If not, how are others handling URLs like: news/43 (43 = DB ID) new/breaking-story (breaking-story=slug) I'd like to avoid a single onActivate() that takes an Object. So, any help would be much appreciated. Thanks, Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T5: Multiple onActivate?
On the surface, I'd like to preserve the bookmarks. Like I said though, I could do that with URLRewrite -- not ideal, but guaranteed to work. Digging further, I'm trying to wrap my head around how Tapestry resolves page names in T5, having been a T3 then a T4 user. The problems I'm running into seem like they really shouldn't be problems and should be a common case that Tapestry should make easy to handle. So, I'm willing to give the framework the benefit of the doubt and correct my understanding. If not, that's fine, too. I'll make a mental note not to try to do these things or reevaluate if it's to be my new framework of choice. For what it's worth, I'm working on migrating an application from django to T5. There are a variety of reasons for this, both technical and political. Ultimately, I'd like to see Java and Tapestry be a suitable replacement for the flexibility of Python and Django. -- Kevin On 10/30/07 7:51 PM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jonathan Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know. There have been some threads and I think JIRA issues over the months on similar topics. They revolve around making Tapestry URL's friendly, and the logic involved in having something like Order/EditOrder reduced down to order/edit, and dealing with cases when the package name is the same as the page name, or even worse, if a parameter looks like a page name. A search for those threads and issues might give you some ideas. Are you just trying to preserve bookmarks? Is this something where you really need to code the logic to cope with the old URL's while migrating to a new URL scheme? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T5: How to upgrade from 5.0.5 to 5.0.6
Some related links: http://tapestryjava.blogspot.com/2007/10/tapestry-506-is-available.html http://tapestryjava.blogspot.com/2007/10/big-improvement-to-quickstart-archetype.html
Re: T5: Multiple onActivate?
Kevin, On this process, T3 -T4 -T5, just keep in mind that Tapestry 5 is much more simple. Marcus
Re: Honeycomb project
Seems to be due to the recent javaforge sw-upgrade. I'll try to recover it. Marcus 2007/10/30, Istvan Szucs [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, The Honeycomb project is closed? I can't access to http://honeycomb.javaforge.com/ website. Any info from this project? It is moved somewhere? Best regards, Stef - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Marcus Schulte http://marcus-schulte.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
