Re: Tapestry Web Site Updated
I don't see why those questions can't be asked and answered on the mailing lists. If you want to ask or answer questions on stackoverflow, do it. If you want to create a forum that's fine too. But the only *official* help source will be the mailing lists. Everything else will just partition the community. Uli On 25.11.2010 02:12, Paul Stanton wrote: Andreas, Agreed 100%. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/tapestry or as a feed: http://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tag/tapestry Maybe the tapestry site can leverage stackoverflow as it's recommended question/answer forum? To work however, this would require some of the people here to take interest. p. On 25/11/2010 11:41 AM, Andreas Andreou wrote: You're probably right on the reasons, but the thing is that it's a pain having to monitor multiple sources of user feedback - there's just never enought free time to do so. And there's also a few big risks: 1) Making the community appear to be unresponsive 2) Frustrating users who never get their questions answered 3) Spreading the info to multiple places is hard to update and easy to get obsolete So, anyway, Tapestry has the mailing list, its website/documentation and there's always StackOverflow. Perhaps it makes sense to define a strategy on how to take advantage of that last one though On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:36, Paul Stantonp...@mapshed.com.au wrote: it did. it's still there but doesn't have the community. the reason it dies was twofold: 1. it was very spam prone: the way it was set up did not do enough to limit/kill spammers 2. it did not get the tapestry community support - it was not even acknowledged by the tapestry site that's not to say a forum wouldn't work if setup and supported by the core tapestry community. p. On 25/11/2010 8:18 AM, Robert Zeigler wrote: Tapestry had a forum for awhile. I think it died. Robert On Nov 24, 2010, at 11/244:46 AM , Paul Stanton wrote: i know most of you guys, who have been using ml for so long probably prefer ml, that's not the point! i guarantee there's a number of users who don't want to configure their inbox for ml and give up. just a thought, if no one can see the benefit i guess it isn't going to happen! i use stackoverflow a lot and attempt to answer or contribute to most tapestry questions. p. On 24/11/2010 8:35 PM, Ivano Luberti wrote: I prefer ml to forums and in nay case ML web archives allow to search them. I cannot see any other advantage of a forum over a ml. Il 24/11/2010 4.56, Paul Stanton ha scritto: how about adding a forum? personally i prefer forums to mailing lists, and i believe a lot of people don't participate in this 'user-group' community and therefore don't get help and therefore don't like tapestry... if you want to attract more users i recommend this. p. On 20/11/2010 8:15 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: We're still working out the kinks ... and I've been working hard on revising the tutorial ... but at long last, we're debuting the new Tapestry Web Site: http://tapestry.apache.org/ Feedback is encouraged; just post to users@tapestry.apache.org with [SITE] in the subject. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Tapestry Web Site Updated
I'm sorry but I strongly disagree: I have never seen a support service as efficient as this mailing list. And for free. Il 25/11/2010 0.33, Paul Stanton ha scritto: They (forums) are to publish discussions on specific matters. Exactly! I'm often disappointed with the level of help offered here, and maybe that's because the mailing list is too much a community where people try to stay connected continuously and not enough a question/answer type discussion. -- == dott. Ivano Mario Luberti Archimede Informatica societa' cooperativa a r. l. Sede Operativa Via Gereschi 36 - 56126- Pisa tel.: +39-050- 580959 tel/fax: +39-050-9711344 web: www.archicoop.it == - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Tapestry Web Site Updated
Ulrich, of course you are entitled to your opinion. p. On 25/11/2010 6:47 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: That's just plain wrong. The form of communication (forum vs. mailing list) will have no impact at all on whether questions you ask are answered more or less conclusively. It's how you ask your question and what information you provide that influences the likelihood whether you'll get a satisfying answer or not. On 25.11.2010 00:33, Paul Stanton wrote: They (forums) are to publish discussions on specific matters. Exactly! I'm often disappointed with the level of help offered here, and maybe that's because the mailing list is too much a community where people try to stay connected continuously and not enough a question/answer type discussion. I think there's a great need for a simple, searchable question/answer 'area' whether it's a forum or something different, where new users can ask those 'dumb' questions (tapestry veterans may think their dumb) where there's a good likelihood that they will be answered in full instead of just falling down the list. Especially with the design of tapestry is such that the internals are not exposed to the developer (ie no polymophism) which makes it more difficult for developers to get a grasp on what is available to them. I've asked a number of questions here which I feel have never had a conclusive answer, i'm sure i'm not the only one. Not to say people aren't helpful, that's that what i think the problem is. I think it's the mechanism (mailing list) more than anything else. p. On 25/11/2010 3:33 AM, Ivano Luberti wrote: Stack Overflow must be a forum because it is a way to collect many professionals of various competences. But forums are not for community where people try to stay connected continuously. They are to publish discussions on specific matters. On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:46, Paul Stantonp...@mapshed.com.au wrote: i know most of you guys, who have been using ml for so long probably prefer ml, that's not the point! i guarantee there's a number of users who don't want to configure their inbox for ml and give up. just a thought, if no one can see the benefit i guess it isn't going to happen! i use stackoverflow a lot and attempt to answer or contribute to most tapestry questions. p. On 24/11/2010 8:35 PM, Ivano Luberti wrote: I prefer ml to forums and in nay case ML web archives allow to search them. I cannot see any other advantage of a forum over a ml. Il 24/11/2010 4.56, Paul Stanton ha scritto: how about adding a forum? personally i prefer forums to mailing lists, and i believe a lot of people don't participate in this 'user-group' community and therefore don't get help and therefore don't like tapestry... if you want to attract more users i recommend this. p. On 20/11/2010 8:15 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: We're still working out the kinks ... and I've been working hard on revising the tutorial ... but at long last, we're debuting the new Tapestry Web Site: http://tapestry.apache.org/ Feedback is encouraged; just post to users@tapestry.apache.org with [SITE] in the subject. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Tapestry Web Site Updated
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Andreas Andreou andy...@di.uoa.gr wrote: So, anyway, Tapestry has the mailing list, its website/documentation and there's always StackOverflow. Perhaps it makes sense to define a strategy on how to take advantage of that last one though Completely agree. Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Tapestry Web Site Updated
I don't see why those questions can't be asked and answered on the mailing lists. you are missing the point. they probably haven't been asked on the ml because the user doesn't want to register/subscribe/manage the ml. some people have a general aversion to ml's. p. On 25/11/2010 7:07 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: I don't see why those questions can't be asked and answered on the mailing lists. If you want to ask or answer questions on stackoverflow, do it. If you want to create a forum that's fine too. But the only *official* help source will be the mailing lists. Everything else will just partition the community. Uli On 25.11.2010 02:12, Paul Stanton wrote: Andreas, Agreed 100%. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/tapestry or as a feed: http://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tag/tapestry Maybe the tapestry site can leverage stackoverflow as it's recommended question/answer forum? To work however, this would require some of the people here to take interest. p. On 25/11/2010 11:41 AM, Andreas Andreou wrote: You're probably right on the reasons, but the thing is that it's a pain having to monitor multiple sources of user feedback - there's just never enought free time to do so. And there's also a few big risks: 1) Making the community appear to be unresponsive 2) Frustrating users who never get their questions answered 3) Spreading the info to multiple places is hard to update and easy to get obsolete So, anyway, Tapestry has the mailing list, its website/documentation and there's always StackOverflow. Perhaps it makes sense to define a strategy on how to take advantage of that last one though On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:36, Paul Stantonp...@mapshed.com.au wrote: it did. it's still there but doesn't have the community. the reason it dies was twofold: 1. it was very spam prone: the way it was set up did not do enough to limit/kill spammers 2. it did not get the tapestry community support - it was not even acknowledged by the tapestry site that's not to say a forum wouldn't work if setup and supported by the core tapestry community. p. On 25/11/2010 8:18 AM, Robert Zeigler wrote: Tapestry had a forum for awhile. I think it died. Robert On Nov 24, 2010, at 11/244:46 AM , Paul Stanton wrote: i know most of you guys, who have been using ml for so long probably prefer ml, that's not the point! i guarantee there's a number of users who don't want to configure their inbox for ml and give up. just a thought, if no one can see the benefit i guess it isn't going to happen! i use stackoverflow a lot and attempt to answer or contribute to most tapestry questions. p. On 24/11/2010 8:35 PM, Ivano Luberti wrote: I prefer ml to forums and in nay case ML web archives allow to search them. I cannot see any other advantage of a forum over a ml. Il 24/11/2010 4.56, Paul Stanton ha scritto: how about adding a forum? personally i prefer forums to mailing lists, and i believe a lot of people don't participate in this 'user-group' community and therefore don't get help and therefore don't like tapestry... if you want to attract more users i recommend this. p. On 20/11/2010 8:15 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: We're still working out the kinks ... and I've been working hard on revising the tutorial ... but at long last, we're debuting the new Tapestry Web Site: http://tapestry.apache.org/ Feedback is encouraged; just post to users@tapestry.apache.org with [SITE] in the subject. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Tapestry Web Site Updated
But registering with StackOverflow or a forum is OK or what? On 25.11.2010 10:19, Paul Stanton wrote: I don't see why those questions can't be asked and answered on the mailing lists. you are missing the point. they probably haven't been asked on the ml because the user doesn't want to register/subscribe/manage the ml. some people have a general aversion to ml's. p. On 25/11/2010 7:07 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: I don't see why those questions can't be asked and answered on the mailing lists. If you want to ask or answer questions on stackoverflow, do it. If you want to create a forum that's fine too. But the only *official* help source will be the mailing lists. Everything else will just partition the community. Uli On 25.11.2010 02:12, Paul Stanton wrote: Andreas, Agreed 100%. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/tapestry or as a feed: http://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tag/tapestry Maybe the tapestry site can leverage stackoverflow as it's recommended question/answer forum? To work however, this would require some of the people here to take interest. p. On 25/11/2010 11:41 AM, Andreas Andreou wrote: You're probably right on the reasons, but the thing is that it's a pain having to monitor multiple sources of user feedback - there's just never enought free time to do so. And there's also a few big risks: 1) Making the community appear to be unresponsive 2) Frustrating users who never get their questions answered 3) Spreading the info to multiple places is hard to update and easy to get obsolete So, anyway, Tapestry has the mailing list, its website/documentation and there's always StackOverflow. Perhaps it makes sense to define a strategy on how to take advantage of that last one though On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:36, Paul Stantonp...@mapshed.com.au wrote: it did. it's still there but doesn't have the community. the reason it dies was twofold: 1. it was very spam prone: the way it was set up did not do enough to limit/kill spammers 2. it did not get the tapestry community support - it was not even acknowledged by the tapestry site that's not to say a forum wouldn't work if setup and supported by the core tapestry community. p. On 25/11/2010 8:18 AM, Robert Zeigler wrote: Tapestry had a forum for awhile. I think it died. Robert On Nov 24, 2010, at 11/244:46 AM , Paul Stanton wrote: i know most of you guys, who have been using ml for so long probably prefer ml, that's not the point! i guarantee there's a number of users who don't want to configure their inbox for ml and give up. just a thought, if no one can see the benefit i guess it isn't going to happen! i use stackoverflow a lot and attempt to answer or contribute to most tapestry questions. p. On 24/11/2010 8:35 PM, Ivano Luberti wrote: I prefer ml to forums and in nay case ML web archives allow to search them. I cannot see any other advantage of a forum over a ml. Il 24/11/2010 4.56, Paul Stanton ha scritto: how about adding a forum? personally i prefer forums to mailing lists, and i believe a lot of people don't participate in this 'user-group' community and therefore don't get help and therefore don't like tapestry... if you want to attract more users i recommend this. p. On 20/11/2010 8:15 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: We're still working out the kinks ... and I've been working hard on revising the tutorial ... but at long last, we're debuting the new Tapestry Web Site: http://tapestry.apache.org/ Feedback is encouraged; just post to users@tapestry.apache.org with [SITE] in the subject. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Hot reloading and mvn:gae:run
To solve my issue, I've added a custom ant builder to Eclipse that copy the target/classes folder to the target/myapp/WEB-INF/classes folder, and then the tapestry hot reload of classes and resources works. It works, but I have to trigger my custom builder manually with Ctrl-B (build project), because it is not runned automatically. On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 22:34, Nicolas Bouillon nico...@bouil.org wrote: Hi, I use tapestry for more than one year now, and I'm very pleased with. I use it daily at work with mvn jetty:run and I much appreciate hot class reloading for pages and components. But at home I'm trying to use it to develop a Google App Engine Application, and I use the maven plugin net.kindleit:maven-gae-plugin with the target mvn gae:run. The hot reload is not working, because this plugin doesn't work the same way as jetty:run : it assemble the war in a directory and run from there. Did anybody get the hot component reloading working in that configuration ? Thanks. Nicolas.
Tapestry Mailing List vs Forum
An interesting discussion. However, while I do see that a forum would, perhaps, be initially more user friendly for new people to join, in the end the creation of such a thing would either divide the community into those on the ML and those on the forum, or at worst the forum would end up with new users joining and no answers because all of the old hands are on this ML. It wouldn't look good either way. Personally I prefer the ML for Tapestry - mainly because the signal to noise ratio is high, there aren't huge numbers of posts, and the things drop into my mailbox where I can easily see them. People on here are (for the most part) friendly and very helpful. I'd rather that wasn't damaged by changing things just for the sake of change. I'd rather that the effort going into this discussion was instead directed to providing better documentation. It's one thing I find most frustrating in the computer industry. I'm afraid I'm not as geeky as some who reside on here and elsewhere; I like instructions to have all the parts filled in, rather than instructions where large parts are missing and only the juicy details given because the author assumes you understand and can fill in background yourself. Some of the HOW-TOs are unfortunately like that. I have a job to do and I don't spend my weekends building my own server or bed time reading of IPv6 (anything but computers! You know what I mean) so better documentation (along the lines of the new Tutorial and docs) is better for me, better for my employer, and better for those coming to Tapestry for the first time. Paul, if the user base increased to such an extent that there were scores of emails per day then I think we should look again at a forum. Until then I think it's not worth exploring. c. -Original Message- From: Paul Stanton [mailto:p...@mapshed.com.au] Sent: 25 November 2010 09:20 To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: Tapestry Web Site Updated I don't see why those questions can't be asked and answered on the mailing lists. you are missing the point. they probably haven't been asked on the ml because the user doesn't want to register/subscribe/manage the ml. some people have a general aversion to ml's. p. On 25/11/2010 7:07 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: I don't see why those questions can't be asked and answered on the mailing lists. If you want to ask or answer questions on stackoverflow, do it. If you want to create a forum that's fine too. But the only *official* help source will be the mailing lists. Everything else will just partition the community. Uli On 25.11.2010 02:12, Paul Stanton wrote: Andreas, Agreed 100%. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/tapestry or as a feed: http://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tag/tapestry Maybe the tapestry site can leverage stackoverflow as it's recommended question/answer forum? To work however, this would require some of the people here to take interest. p. On 25/11/2010 11:41 AM, Andreas Andreou wrote: You're probably right on the reasons, but the thing is that it's a pain having to monitor multiple sources of user feedback - there's just never enought free time to do so. And there's also a few big risks: 1) Making the community appear to be unresponsive 2) Frustrating users who never get their questions answered 3) Spreading the info to multiple places is hard to update and easy to get obsolete So, anyway, Tapestry has the mailing list, its website/documentation and there's always StackOverflow. Perhaps it makes sense to define a strategy on how to take advantage of that last one though On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:36, Paul Stantonp...@mapshed.com.au wrote: it did. it's still there but doesn't have the community. the reason it dies was twofold: 1. it was very spam prone: the way it was set up did not do enough to limit/kill spammers 2. it did not get the tapestry community support - it was not even acknowledged by the tapestry site that's not to say a forum wouldn't work if setup and supported by the core tapestry community. p. On 25/11/2010 8:18 AM, Robert Zeigler wrote: Tapestry had a forum for awhile. I think it died. Robert On Nov 24, 2010, at 11/244:46 AM , Paul Stanton wrote: i know most of you guys, who have been using ml for so long probably prefer ml, that's not the point! i guarantee there's a number of users who don't want to configure their inbox for ml and give up. just a thought, if no one can see the benefit i guess it isn't going to happen! i use stackoverflow a lot and attempt to answer or contribute to most tapestry questions. p. On 24/11/2010 8:35 PM, Ivano Luberti wrote: I prefer ml to forums and in nay case ML web archives allow to search them. I cannot see any other advantage of a forum over a ml. Il 24/11/2010 4.56, Paul Stanton ha scritto: how about adding a forum? personally i prefer forums to mailing lists, and i believe a lot of people don't
Re: Tapestry Web Site Updated
If you register on the user mailing list with your google mail account and create a filter on the mailbox, then you have the ultimate power of sorting threads and searching the knowledge. It can not get better. When I see a forum which has a search link which takes you to another page where you are presented with unfamiliar and often user unfriendly web form and later with a result page which also often does not meet minimum quality requirements, then I see a forum like software as an outdated form of communication and collaboration. Stackoverflow is an ideal service for questions and answers, whereas mailing list often serves also as a discussion and propositions media. -Borut 2010/11/25 Paul Stanton p...@mapshed.com.au I don't see why those questions can't be asked and answered on the mailing lists. you are missing the point. they probably haven't been asked on the ml because the user doesn't want to register/subscribe/manage the ml. some people have a general aversion to ml's. p. On 25/11/2010 7:07 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: I don't see why those questions can't be asked and answered on the mailing lists. If you want to ask or answer questions on stackoverflow, do it. If you want to create a forum that's fine too. But the only *official* help source will be the mailing lists. Everything else will just partition the community. Uli On 25.11.2010 02:12, Paul Stanton wrote: Andreas, Agreed 100%. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/tapestry or as a feed: http://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tag/tapestry Maybe the tapestry site can leverage stackoverflow as it's recommended question/answer forum? To work however, this would require some of the people here to take interest. p. On 25/11/2010 11:41 AM, Andreas Andreou wrote: You're probably right on the reasons, but the thing is that it's a pain having to monitor multiple sources of user feedback - there's just never enought free time to do so. And there's also a few big risks: 1) Making the community appear to be unresponsive 2) Frustrating users who never get their questions answered 3) Spreading the info to multiple places is hard to update and easy to get obsolete So, anyway, Tapestry has the mailing list, its website/documentation and there's always StackOverflow. Perhaps it makes sense to define a strategy on how to take advantage of that last one though On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:36, Paul Stantonp...@mapshed.com.au wrote: it did. it's still there but doesn't have the community. the reason it dies was twofold: 1. it was very spam prone: the way it was set up did not do enough to limit/kill spammers 2. it did not get the tapestry community support - it was not even acknowledged by the tapestry site that's not to say a forum wouldn't work if setup and supported by the core tapestry community. p. On 25/11/2010 8:18 AM, Robert Zeigler wrote: Tapestry had a forum for awhile. I think it died. Robert On Nov 24, 2010, at 11/244:46 AM , Paul Stanton wrote: i know most of you guys, who have been using ml for so long probably prefer ml, that's not the point! i guarantee there's a number of users who don't want to configure their inbox for ml and give up. just a thought, if no one can see the benefit i guess it isn't going to happen! i use stackoverflow a lot and attempt to answer or contribute to most tapestry questions. p. On 24/11/2010 8:35 PM, Ivano Luberti wrote: I prefer ml to forums and in nay case ML web archives allow to search them. I cannot see any other advantage of a forum over a ml. Il 24/11/2010 4.56, Paul Stanton ha scritto: how about adding a forum? personally i prefer forums to mailing lists, and i believe a lot of people don't participate in this 'user-group' community and therefore don't get help and therefore don't like tapestry... if you want to attract more users i recommend this. p. On 20/11/2010 8:15 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: We're still working out the kinks ... and I've been working hard on revising the tutorial ... but at long last, we're debuting the new Tapestry Web Site: http://tapestry.apache.org/ Feedback is encouraged; just post to us...@tapestry.apache.orgwith [SITE] in the subject. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Re: Tapestry Web Site Updated
I didn't mean to start an egg throwing contest with anyone, just thought it was a good idea to bring up for discussion. I appreciate all the comments and opinions, hopefully something comes of it even if it's just a few more people monitoring the SO list. I won't post again on the topic because I have nothing more to say. cheers, p. On 25/11/2010 8:22 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: But registering with StackOverflow or a forum is OK or what? On 25.11.2010 10:19, Paul Stanton wrote: I don't see why those questions can't be asked and answered on the mailing lists. you are missing the point. they probably haven't been asked on the ml because the user doesn't want to register/subscribe/manage the ml. some people have a general aversion to ml's. p. On 25/11/2010 7:07 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: I don't see why those questions can't be asked and answered on the mailing lists. If you want to ask or answer questions on stackoverflow, do it. If you want to create a forum that's fine too. But the only *official* help source will be the mailing lists. Everything else will just partition the community. Uli On 25.11.2010 02:12, Paul Stanton wrote: Andreas, Agreed 100%. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/tapestry or as a feed: http://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tag/tapestry Maybe the tapestry site can leverage stackoverflow as it's recommended question/answer forum? To work however, this would require some of the people here to take interest. p. On 25/11/2010 11:41 AM, Andreas Andreou wrote: You're probably right on the reasons, but the thing is that it's a pain having to monitor multiple sources of user feedback - there's just never enought free time to do so. And there's also a few big risks: 1) Making the community appear to be unresponsive 2) Frustrating users who never get their questions answered 3) Spreading the info to multiple places is hard to update and easy to get obsolete So, anyway, Tapestry has the mailing list, its website/documentation and there's always StackOverflow. Perhaps it makes sense to define a strategy on how to take advantage of that last one though On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:36, Paul Stantonp...@mapshed.com.au wrote: it did. it's still there but doesn't have the community. the reason it dies was twofold: 1. it was very spam prone: the way it was set up did not do enough to limit/kill spammers 2. it did not get the tapestry community support - it was not even acknowledged by the tapestry site that's not to say a forum wouldn't work if setup and supported by the core tapestry community. p. On 25/11/2010 8:18 AM, Robert Zeigler wrote: Tapestry had a forum for awhile. I think it died. Robert On Nov 24, 2010, at 11/244:46 AM , Paul Stanton wrote: i know most of you guys, who have been using ml for so long probably prefer ml, that's not the point! i guarantee there's a number of users who don't want to configure their inbox for ml and give up. just a thought, if no one can see the benefit i guess it isn't going to happen! i use stackoverflow a lot and attempt to answer or contribute to most tapestry questions. p. On 24/11/2010 8:35 PM, Ivano Luberti wrote: I prefer ml to forums and in nay case ML web archives allow to search them. I cannot see any other advantage of a forum over a ml. Il 24/11/2010 4.56, Paul Stanton ha scritto: how about adding a forum? personally i prefer forums to mailing lists, and i believe a lot of people don't participate in this 'user-group' community and therefore don't get help and therefore don't like tapestry... if you want to attract more users i recommend this. p. On 20/11/2010 8:15 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: We're still working out the kinks ... and I've been working hard on revising the tutorial ... but at long last, we're debuting the new Tapestry Web Site: http://tapestry.apache.org/ Feedback is encouraged; just post to users@tapestry.apache.org with [SITE] in the subject. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Redirect to URL with params
Hi! I need to redirect user to an url with some parameters (simulate a post without form). Can you help me to do that, please ? Thanks in advance.
Re: Redirect to URL with params
Can you be a little more explicit: You want a GET request (instead of a POST) to trigger a redirect? Does the original GET or the redirect contain url parameters? Or both? Do either of them have an activation context? -Original Message- From: Gnu Ubuntu gnu.ubu...@gmail.com Reply-to: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: Redirect to URL with params Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:24:04 +0100 Hi! I need to redirect user to an url with some parameters (simulate a post without form). Can you help me to do that, please ? Thanks in advance. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Redirect to URL with params
Thanks Richard for your response. What I want is to do a post request but my page dosn't contain any form. The user will be redirected to an URL with some parameters and after that I must get some other parameters from the response. I hope that is more clear now. Thanks.
Re: Redirect to URL with params
Ok so, if I follow correctly:
Page A: Doesn't have a form. So instead you have a normal link. This
contains as url parameters the data to be sent. After processing you
want to redirect to Page B. So you could do something like this:
PageA.java:
@Inject
private Request request;
@Inject
private PageRenderLinkSource prls;
public Link onActivate() {
String value1 = request.getParam(key1);
String value2 =
// Do something with these
Link link = prls.createPageRenderLink(PageB.class);
link.addParameter(key1, value1);
...
return link;
}
If the processing is done by PageA as above, you'll need some logic in
onActivate() that determines whether you redirect or render the page
(returning null will mean that PageA is rendered).
Or instead of a t:pagelink in PageA you could use an t:actionlink
instead, and return the Link in the onActionFromYourLink().
Hope that helps.
-Original Message-
From: Gnu Ubuntu gnu.ubu...@gmail.com
Reply-to: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org, r...@su3analytics.com
Subject: Re: Redirect to URL with params
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:56:15 +0100
Thanks Richard for your response.
What I want is to do a post request but my page dosn't contain any form. The
user will be redirected to an URL with some parameters and after that I must
get some other parameters from the response.
I hope that is more clear now.
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: context asset servlet gives directory listing and access to WEB-INF
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:03:03 -0200, Paul Stanton p...@mapshed.com.au wrote: Thanks Thiago, Hi! AFAIK you don't need to check for the real file. Just checking the URL is enough. Besides this, I think it is ok. Have you tested it already? -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and instructor Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. http://www.arsmachina.com.br - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Reusable login component
Hi, Katia! On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 06:13:48 -0200, Katia Aresti katiaare...@gmail.com wrote: There are always several ways to do the same thing. @Thiago Doing with events like this, does not come up to the same to same thing ? In the end I have to catch the event on my page to decide where to go. So, why not telling the component from the beginning where to go ? I mean, why complicating life defining new events handling, triggering and catching for this use case ? Isn't it simpler and more readable to tell the login form where to go from the beginning ? I guess you're right. :) When I read your message, I've read parameter as query parameter, not as component parameter. (facepalm) -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and instructor Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. http://www.arsmachina.com.br - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Redirect to URL with params
Thanks Richard, I'll try that.
2010/11/25 Richard Hill r...@su3analytics.com
Ok so, if I follow correctly:
Page A: Doesn't have a form. So instead you have a normal link. This
contains as url parameters the data to be sent. After processing you
want to redirect to Page B. So you could do something like this:
PageA.java:
@Inject
private Request request;
@Inject
private PageRenderLinkSource prls;
public Link onActivate() {
String value1 = request.getParam(key1);
String value2 =
// Do something with these
Link link = prls.createPageRenderLink(PageB.class);
link.addParameter(key1, value1);
...
return link;
}
If the processing is done by PageA as above, you'll need some logic in
onActivate() that determines whether you redirect or render the page
(returning null will mean that PageA is rendered).
Or instead of a t:pagelink in PageA you could use an t:actionlink
instead, and return the Link in the onActionFromYourLink().
Hope that helps.
-Original Message-
From: Gnu Ubuntu gnu.ubu...@gmail.com
Reply-to: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org, r...@su3analytics.com
Subject: Re: Redirect to URL with params
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:56:15 +0100
Thanks Richard for your response.
What I want is to do a post request but my page dosn't contain any form.
The
user will be redirected to an URL with some parameters and after that I
must
get some other parameters from the response.
I hope that is more clear now.
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Reusable login component
How to tell the component from the beginning where to go? Because it depends
on the parent page where the login component is included AND on a
authentication fonction success?
Here is my Login component :
public class Login {
@Inject
private IAuthenticationService authenticationService;
@Property
private String login;
@Property
private String password;
public Object onSuccess () {
if (authenticationService.login (login, password) != null) {
return (Main.class);
}
return (Index.class);
}
}
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Reusable-login-component-tp3279297p3280031.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Tapestry Web Site Updated
Borut beat me to it. If you use GMail to subscribe to the mailing list and create a filter to automatically tag messages and move them out of your inbox, then you practically end up with a personal forum system. It works beautifully for every Apache mailing list I subscribe to. GMail keeps it orderly and threaded, just like a forum does. Star helpful postings, add other tags, search to your heart's content (although you have to have been subscribed for a while for this to be useful), don't worry about disk space (seriously, be a pack rat and keep every message) or management, and it is in the cloud, so you can hit the mailing list (your personal forum) anywhere. Also, this approach doesn't fragment the community, which is important -- it is hard enough covering the mailing list with all of the other commitments people have. Maybe the first FAQ entry be Subscribe to Tapestry User with GMail? mrg On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Borut Bolčina borut.bolc...@gmail.com wrote: If you register on the user mailing list with your google mail account and create a filter on the mailbox, then you have the ultimate power of sorting threads and searching the knowledge. It can not get better. When I see a forum which has a search link which takes you to another page where you are presented with unfamiliar and often user unfriendly web form and later with a result page which also often does not meet minimum quality requirements, then I see a forum like software as an outdated form of communication and collaboration. Stackoverflow is an ideal service for questions and answers, whereas mailing list often serves also as a discussion and propositions media. -Borut 2010/11/25 Paul Stanton p...@mapshed.com.au I don't see why those questions can't be asked and answered on the mailing lists. you are missing the point. they probably haven't been asked on the ml because the user doesn't want to register/subscribe/manage the ml. some people have a general aversion to ml's. p. On 25/11/2010 7:07 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: I don't see why those questions can't be asked and answered on the mailing lists. If you want to ask or answer questions on stackoverflow, do it. If you want to create a forum that's fine too. But the only *official* help source will be the mailing lists. Everything else will just partition the community. Uli On 25.11.2010 02:12, Paul Stanton wrote: Andreas, Agreed 100%. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/tapestry or as a feed: http://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tag/tapestry Maybe the tapestry site can leverage stackoverflow as it's recommended question/answer forum? To work however, this would require some of the people here to take interest. p. On 25/11/2010 11:41 AM, Andreas Andreou wrote: You're probably right on the reasons, but the thing is that it's a pain having to monitor multiple sources of user feedback - there's just never enought free time to do so. And there's also a few big risks: 1) Making the community appear to be unresponsive 2) Frustrating users who never get their questions answered 3) Spreading the info to multiple places is hard to update and easy to get obsolete So, anyway, Tapestry has the mailing list, its website/documentation and there's always StackOverflow. Perhaps it makes sense to define a strategy on how to take advantage of that last one though On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:36, Paul Stantonp...@mapshed.com.au wrote: it did. it's still there but doesn't have the community. the reason it dies was twofold: 1. it was very spam prone: the way it was set up did not do enough to limit/kill spammers 2. it did not get the tapestry community support - it was not even acknowledged by the tapestry site that's not to say a forum wouldn't work if setup and supported by the core tapestry community. p. On 25/11/2010 8:18 AM, Robert Zeigler wrote: Tapestry had a forum for awhile. I think it died. Robert On Nov 24, 2010, at 11/244:46 AM , Paul Stanton wrote: i know most of you guys, who have been using ml for so long probably prefer ml, that's not the point! i guarantee there's a number of users who don't want to configure their inbox for ml and give up. just a thought, if no one can see the benefit i guess it isn't going to happen! i use stackoverflow a lot and attempt to answer or contribute to most tapestry questions. p. On 24/11/2010 8:35 PM, Ivano Luberti wrote: I prefer ml to forums and in nay case ML web archives allow to search them. I cannot see any other advantage of a forum over a ml. Il 24/11/2010 4.56, Paul Stanton ha scritto: how about adding a forum? personally i prefer forums to mailing lists, and i believe a lot of people don't participate in this 'user-group' community and therefore don't get help and therefore don't like tapestry... if you want to attract more users i recommend this. p. On 20/11/2010 8:15 AM, Howard Lewis Ship
Re: Reusable login component
Hi !
Use events and callbacks, see ComponentResources.triggerEvent
2010/11/25 Tibo23 thibault.malbra...@gmail.com
How to tell the component from the beginning where to go? Because it
depends
on the parent page where the login component is included AND on a
authentication fonction success?
Here is my Login component :
public class Login {
@Inject
private IAuthenticationService authenticationService;
@Property
private String login;
@Property
private String password;
public Object onSuccess () {
if (authenticationService.login (login, password) != null) {
return (Main.class);
}
return (Index.class);
}
}
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Reusable-login-component-tp3279297p3280031.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Regards,
Christophe Cordenier.
Committer on Apache Tapestry 5
Co-creator of wooki @wookicentral.com
Re: Reusable login component
Without doing it with callbacks and events, more simple for your use case :
you can define 2 input parameters like this in you component :
@Parameter(defaultPrefix = BindingConstants.LITERAL)
private String successPage;
@Parameter(defaultPrefix = BindingConstants.LITERAL)
private String errorPage;
you change like this :
public Object onSuccess () {
if (authenticationService.login (login, password) != null) {
return successPage;
}
return errorPage;
}
And finally when you use you component, you can pass the values as
parameters on the same way as you do it with other components.
Katia
2010/11/25 Tibo23 thibault.malbra...@gmail.com
How to tell the component from the beginning where to go? Because it
depends
on the parent page where the login component is included AND on a
authentication fonction success?
Here is my Login component :
public class Login {
@Inject
private IAuthenticationService authenticationService;
@Property
private String login;
@Property
private String password;
public Object onSuccess () {
if (authenticationService.login (login, password) != null) {
return (Main.class);
}
return (Index.class);
}
}
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Reusable-login-component-tp3279297p3280031.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Any good tapestry5 plugin for eclipse
Hi Is there any good tapestry5 plugin for eclipse. regards Taha
Re: Any good tapestry5 plugin for eclipse
This one is very helpful for creating templates and switching between template and java. It's also pretty much the only useful T5 eclipse plugin. http://code.google.com/p/loom-t5/ On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Taha Hafeez tawus.tapes...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Is there any good tapestry5 plugin for eclipse. regards Taha
Re: Any good tapestry5 plugin for eclipse
Thanks regards Taha On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Inge Solvoll inge.tapes...@gmail.comwrote: This one is very helpful for creating templates and switching between template and java. It's also pretty much the only useful T5 eclipse plugin. http://code.google.com/p/loom-t5/ On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Taha Hafeez tawus.tapes...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Is there any good tapestry5 plugin for eclipse. regards Taha
RE: Any good tapestry5 plugin for eclipse
Hi Taha, This wiki link is very helpfull to get Component completion with parameters and description for TML files into Eclipse : http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5JSPEditorEclipse Cheers, Laurent GUÉRIN -Message d'origine- De : Taha Hafeez [mailto:tawus.tapes...@gmail.com] Envoyé : jeudi 25 novembre 2010 15:56 À : Tapestry users Objet : Re: Any good tapestry5 plugin for eclipse Thanks regards Taha On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Inge Solvoll inge.tapes...@gmail.comwrote: This one is very helpful for creating templates and switching between template and java. It's also pretty much the only useful T5 eclipse plugin. http://code.google.com/p/loom-t5/ On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Taha Hafeez tawus.tapes...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Is there any good tapestry5 plugin for eclipse. regards Taha - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Any good tapestry5 plugin for eclipse
There is Loom T5, it helps a little http://code.google.com/p/loom-t5/ ___ Everton Agner Ramos 2010/11/25 Guerin Laurent lgue...@sopragroup.com Hi Taha, This wiki link is very helpfull to get Component completion with parameters and description for TML files into Eclipse : http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5JSPEditorEclipse Cheers, Laurent GUÉRIN -Message d'origine- De : Taha Hafeez [mailto:tawus.tapes...@gmail.com] Envoyé : jeudi 25 novembre 2010 15:56 À : Tapestry users Objet : Re: Any good tapestry5 plugin for eclipse Thanks regards Taha On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Inge Solvoll inge.tapes...@gmail.com wrote: This one is very helpful for creating templates and switching between template and java. It's also pretty much the only useful T5 eclipse plugin. http://code.google.com/p/loom-t5/ On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Taha Hafeez tawus.tapes...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Is there any good tapestry5 plugin for eclipse. regards Taha - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: T5.1 and Tynamo Security: override a Shiro Filter
Whoops. We certainly wanted to make overriding possible
programmatically. I'm on it, didn't look into the code yet but if it
doesn't currently work I'll definitely fix it. Which version of
tapestry-security are you using?
Kalle
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:11 AM, anton.litvinenko
anton.litvine...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I need to override Shiro authc filter. I can do that via shiro.ini file:
[main]
authc=com.programeter.web.security.RemoteUserAuhtenticationFilter
But I am wondering if there's way to achieve the same via XxxModule and
configure Shiro via Tynamo Security. Tynamo has a SecurityRequestFilter
class, but it seems that section that could help me is commented out:
/*
//Apply the acquired and/or configured filters:
MapString, Filter filters = getFilters();
if (!CollectionUtils.isEmpty(filters)) {
for (Map.EntryString, Filter entry : filters.entrySet()) {
String name = entry.getKey();
Filter filter = entry.getValue();
applyGlobalPropertiesIfNecessary(filter);
if (filter instanceof Nameable) {
((Nameable) filter).setName(name);
}
//'init' argument is false, since Spring-configured filters
should be initialized
//in Spring (i.e. 'init-method=blah') or implement
InitializingBean:
manager.addFilter(name, filter, false);
}
}
*/
Am I missing something? Or it is by design not permitted to override (or add
custom) filters via Tapestry IOC?
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry-users.832.n2.nabble.com/T5-1-and-Tynamo-Security-override-a-Shiro-Filter-tp5769989p5769989.html
Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: context asset servlet gives directory listing and access to WEB-INF
Yes tested and it works. I create the real file so I can disallow all directory listings. I could do this by testing for the (non)existence of a file extension, however that isn't technically cross-platform etc... so i create the file to test whether it's a directory, and disallow if it is. the 'exists' test is just there because i already have the File object anyway. I figured since I'm only executing the logic for things that start with /asset/ctx/ the overhead shouldn't be noticeable, however on second thought maybe this isn't a good idea? what do you think? p. On 25/11/2010 10:36 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote: On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:03:03 -0200, Paul Stanton p...@mapshed.com.au wrote: Thanks Thiago, Hi! AFAIK you don't need to check for the real file. Just checking the URL is enough. Besides this, I think it is ok. Have you tested it already? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: context asset servlet gives directory listing and access to WEB-INF
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:24:39 -0200, Paul Stanton p...@mapshed.com.au wrote: Yes tested and it works. Yay! :) I figured since I'm only executing the logic for things that start with /asset/ctx/ the overhead shouldn't be noticeable, however on second thought maybe this isn't a good idea? There's a possibility it creates a bottleneck, as you're going to the file system once before the request is handled normally or access is denied. Of course, it depends on the number of context assets you use, etc. If it's in the context and it isn't inside WEB-INF, it's probably meant to be public, so I wouldn't do this check in your scenario. -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and instructor Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. http://www.arsmachina.com.br - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: T5.1 and Tynamo Security: override a Shiro Filter
Follow http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TYNAMO-67. In the one
application I needed this, I'm still using tapestry-security 0.1.0
which allowed these type of contributions and was a separate and my
original effort at integrating jsecurity/shiro. There were a few other
interesting features and I'll merge them in over time, but don't hold
your breath. Out of interest, what's your use case for it? (If it's
just the dislike of the configuration file, that's fine I get it).
Kalle
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Kalle Korhonen
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
Whoops. We certainly wanted to make overriding possible
programmatically. I'm on it, didn't look into the code yet but if it
doesn't currently work I'll definitely fix it. Which version of
tapestry-security are you using?
Kalle
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:11 AM, anton.litvinenko
anton.litvine...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I need to override Shiro authc filter. I can do that via shiro.ini file:
[main]
authc=com.programeter.web.security.RemoteUserAuhtenticationFilter
But I am wondering if there's way to achieve the same via XxxModule and
configure Shiro via Tynamo Security. Tynamo has a SecurityRequestFilter
class, but it seems that section that could help me is commented out:
/*
//Apply the acquired and/or configured filters:
MapString, Filter filters = getFilters();
if (!CollectionUtils.isEmpty(filters)) {
for (Map.EntryString, Filter entry : filters.entrySet()) {
String name = entry.getKey();
Filter filter = entry.getValue();
applyGlobalPropertiesIfNecessary(filter);
if (filter instanceof Nameable) {
((Nameable) filter).setName(name);
}
//'init' argument is false, since Spring-configured filters
should be initialized
//in Spring (i.e. 'init-method=blah') or implement
InitializingBean:
manager.addFilter(name, filter, false);
}
}
*/
Am I missing something? Or it is by design not permitted to override (or add
custom) filters via Tapestry IOC?
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry-users.832.n2.nabble.com/T5-1-and-Tynamo-Security-override-a-Shiro-Filter-tp5769989p5769989.html
Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: context asset servlet gives directory listing and access to WEB-INF
Thiago, I do want to make sure i disallow directory listings.
agree there is potential for bottleneck so I have changed to:
public boolean service(Request request, Response response,
RequestHandler handler) throws IOException
{
String path = request.getPath();
String contextAssetPath = RequestConstants.ASSET_PATH_PREFIX +
RequestConstants.CONTEXT_FOLDER;
if (path.startsWith(contextAssetPath))
{
if (path.contains(WEB-INF) || path.contains(META-INF))
return fail(request, response);
// basic test for a file with an extension - avoids
creating a new file
// (not fool proof but problems will be obvious in testing)
String last = path.substring(path.length() - 5);
if (!last.contains(.))
return fail(request, response);
}
LOG.trace(allowed + path);
return handler.service(request, response);
}
On 26/11/2010 8:03 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:24:39 -0200, Paul Stanton p...@mapshed.com.au
wrote:
Yes tested and it works.
Yay! :)
I figured since I'm only executing the logic for things that start
with /asset/ctx/ the overhead shouldn't be noticeable, however on
second thought maybe this isn't a good idea?
There's a possibility it creates a bottleneck, as you're going to the
file system once before the request is handled normally or access is
denied. Of course, it depends on the number of context assets you use,
etc. If it's in the context and it isn't inside WEB-INF, it's probably
meant to be public, so I wouldn't do this check in your scenario.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Any good tapestry5 plugin for eclipse
Thanks everybody I had a look at it. I feel tapestry is in need of a good eclipse plugin !! Don't know much about writing a plugin but am considering it.. Something on the lines of http://www.laughingpanda.org/mediawiki/index.php/Wicket_Bench regards Taha On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Everton Agner ton.ag...@gmail.com wrote: There is Loom T5, it helps a little http://code.google.com/p/loom-t5/ ___ Everton Agner Ramos 2010/11/25 Guerin Laurent lgue...@sopragroup.com Hi Taha, This wiki link is very helpfull to get Component completion with parameters and description for TML files into Eclipse : http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5JSPEditorEclipse Cheers, Laurent GUÉRIN -Message d'origine- De : Taha Hafeez [mailto:tawus.tapes...@gmail.com] Envoyé : jeudi 25 novembre 2010 15:56 À : Tapestry users Objet : Re: Any good tapestry5 plugin for eclipse Thanks regards Taha On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Inge Solvoll inge.tapes...@gmail.com wrote: This one is very helpful for creating templates and switching between template and java. It's also pretty much the only useful T5 eclipse plugin. http://code.google.com/p/loom-t5/ On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Taha Hafeez tawus.tapes...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Is there any good tapestry5 plugin for eclipse. regards Taha - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
