RE: I'm missing something obvious
In our setup, the problem will only occur with numbers with more than 3 digits. As far as I can see, dojo guesses the grouping from the locale when no grouping-character is given. To me, it seems as if the flag groupSize in the call to dojo.i18n.number.isReal should be explicitly set to zero. -Original Message- From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 10:11 PM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: I'm missing something obvious Aha. So the only real difference between the demo page and your configuration is that you specified a pattern of 0. The demo pages use the more generic # (as well as the default for the number translator). If I remember correctly specifying something like 0 for the pattern forces your input to be exactly one digit, so anything like 11 would fail. http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/text/DecimalFormat.html On 5/14/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm assuming that any value between 1 and 99 should work. I just tried 1234 and it failed as does every other number I type in. Playing w/ the page at opencomponentry that you linked below, the validators seem to work fine which is why I can't figure out what's up. I really think I must have a typo, a missing comma or something just crazy but I can't find it. Thanks again for all of your efforts Tony Jesse Kuhnert wrote: Hmm doesn't seem to be conjuring up any eurekas for me currently. . I wonder what the difference is between your field and the fields on the Workbench form? http://opencomponentry.com:8080/workbench/Home,$Border.pageLink.sdirec t?sp=SFields It has a similar setup but I can't see where the error is happening. What exact value should pass but is failing for you? Just to be sure. On 5/14/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry Jesse, I didn't realize this message didn't have the whole trail. I have a simple input: input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:tradeId validators=validators:required,min=0,max=100 translator=translator:number,pattern=0 displayName=Trade ID / the tradeId property is nothing more than: public abstract Integer getTradeId(); No matter what value I enter, valid or not, I alway get a dojo popup with 3 errors, the input must be a number, it must be greater than 0 and less than 10. I can get past this issue by disabling client validation, but I really don't want to do that. I believe the dojo warning I'm seeing is from a datePicker that is on the form, but I will have to do some more research. Thanks again for all of your help. Tony Nelson Jesse Kuhnert wrote: What issue exactly is it that you see? If you could provide the exact text that is presented as the reason for the error as well as what input you gave it to produce the error I can be more helpful. On 5/14/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Grabbing today's latest build, I'm still seeing the same dojo validation issue. As a bonus, there is a new debug message: DEBUG: EXPERIMENTAL: dojo.i18n.number -- Not yet ready for use. APIs subject to change without notice. Happy Monday! Thanks in advance, Tony Nelson snipped --- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I'm missing something obvious
What issue exactly is it that you see? If you could provide the exact text that is presented as the reason for the error as well as what input you gave it to produce the error I can be more helpful. On 5/14/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Grabbing today's latest build, I'm still seeing the same dojo validation issue. As a bonus, there is a new debug message: DEBUG: EXPERIMENTAL: dojo.i18n.number -- Not yet ready for use. APIs subject to change without notice. Happy Monday! Thanks in advance, Tony Nelson snipped -- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
Re: I'm missing something obvious
Sorry Jesse, I didn't realize this message didn't have the whole trail. I have a simple input: input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:tradeId validators=validators:required,min=0,max=100 translator=translator:number,pattern=0 displayName=Trade ID / the tradeId property is nothing more than: public abstract Integer getTradeId(); No matter what value I enter, valid or not, I alway get a dojo popup with 3 errors, the input must be a number, it must be greater than 0 and less than 10. I can get past this issue by disabling client validation, but I really don't want to do that. I believe the dojo warning I'm seeing is from a datePicker that is on the form, but I will have to do some more research. Thanks again for all of your help. Tony Nelson Jesse Kuhnert wrote: What issue exactly is it that you see? If you could provide the exact text that is presented as the reason for the error as well as what input you gave it to produce the error I can be more helpful. On 5/14/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Grabbing today's latest build, I'm still seeing the same dojo validation issue. As a bonus, there is a new debug message: DEBUG: EXPERIMENTAL: dojo.i18n.number -- Not yet ready for use. APIs subject to change without notice. Happy Monday! Thanks in advance, Tony Nelson snipped - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I'm missing something obvious
Hmm doesn't seem to be conjuring up any eurekas for me currently. . I wonder what the difference is between your field and the fields on the Workbench form? http://opencomponentry.com:8080/workbench/Home,$Border.pageLink.sdirect?sp=SFields It has a similar setup but I can't see where the error is happening. What exact value should pass but is failing for you? Just to be sure. On 5/14/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry Jesse, I didn't realize this message didn't have the whole trail. I have a simple input: input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:tradeId validators=validators:required,min=0,max=100 translator=translator:number,pattern=0 displayName=Trade ID / the tradeId property is nothing more than: public abstract Integer getTradeId(); No matter what value I enter, valid or not, I alway get a dojo popup with 3 errors, the input must be a number, it must be greater than 0 and less than 10. I can get past this issue by disabling client validation, but I really don't want to do that. I believe the dojo warning I'm seeing is from a datePicker that is on the form, but I will have to do some more research. Thanks again for all of your help. Tony Nelson Jesse Kuhnert wrote: What issue exactly is it that you see? If you could provide the exact text that is presented as the reason for the error as well as what input you gave it to produce the error I can be more helpful. On 5/14/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Grabbing today's latest build, I'm still seeing the same dojo validation issue. As a bonus, there is a new debug message: DEBUG: EXPERIMENTAL: dojo.i18n.number -- Not yet ready for use. APIs subject to change without notice. Happy Monday! Thanks in advance, Tony Nelson snipped - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
Re: I'm missing something obvious
I'm assuming that any value between 1 and 99 should work. I just tried 1234 and it failed as does every other number I type in. Playing w/ the page at opencomponentry that you linked below, the validators seem to work fine which is why I can't figure out what's up. I really think I must have a typo, a missing comma or something just crazy but I can't find it. Thanks again for all of your efforts Tony Jesse Kuhnert wrote: Hmm doesn't seem to be conjuring up any eurekas for me currently. . I wonder what the difference is between your field and the fields on the Workbench form? http://opencomponentry.com:8080/workbench/Home,$Border.pageLink.sdirect?sp=SFields It has a similar setup but I can't see where the error is happening. What exact value should pass but is failing for you? Just to be sure. On 5/14/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry Jesse, I didn't realize this message didn't have the whole trail. I have a simple input: input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:tradeId validators=validators:required,min=0,max=100 translator=translator:number,pattern=0 displayName=Trade ID / the tradeId property is nothing more than: public abstract Integer getTradeId(); No matter what value I enter, valid or not, I alway get a dojo popup with 3 errors, the input must be a number, it must be greater than 0 and less than 10. I can get past this issue by disabling client validation, but I really don't want to do that. I believe the dojo warning I'm seeing is from a datePicker that is on the form, but I will have to do some more research. Thanks again for all of your help. Tony Nelson Jesse Kuhnert wrote: What issue exactly is it that you see? If you could provide the exact text that is presented as the reason for the error as well as what input you gave it to produce the error I can be more helpful. On 5/14/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Grabbing today's latest build, I'm still seeing the same dojo validation issue. As a bonus, there is a new debug message: DEBUG: EXPERIMENTAL: dojo.i18n.number -- Not yet ready for use. APIs subject to change without notice. Happy Monday! Thanks in advance, Tony Nelson snipped - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I'm missing something obvious
Aha. So the only real difference between the demo page and your configuration is that you specified a pattern of 0. The demo pages use the more generic # (as well as the default for the number translator). If I remember correctly specifying something like 0 for the pattern forces your input to be exactly one digit, so anything like 11 would fail. http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/text/DecimalFormat.html On 5/14/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm assuming that any value between 1 and 99 should work. I just tried 1234 and it failed as does every other number I type in. Playing w/ the page at opencomponentry that you linked below, the validators seem to work fine which is why I can't figure out what's up. I really think I must have a typo, a missing comma or something just crazy but I can't find it. Thanks again for all of your efforts Tony Jesse Kuhnert wrote: Hmm doesn't seem to be conjuring up any eurekas for me currently. . I wonder what the difference is between your field and the fields on the Workbench form? http://opencomponentry.com:8080/workbench/Home,$Border.pageLink.sdirect?sp=SFields It has a similar setup but I can't see where the error is happening. What exact value should pass but is failing for you? Just to be sure. On 5/14/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry Jesse, I didn't realize this message didn't have the whole trail. I have a simple input: input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:tradeId validators=validators:required,min=0,max=100 translator=translator:number,pattern=0 displayName=Trade ID / the tradeId property is nothing more than: public abstract Integer getTradeId(); No matter what value I enter, valid or not, I alway get a dojo popup with 3 errors, the input must be a number, it must be greater than 0 and less than 10. I can get past this issue by disabling client validation, but I really don't want to do that. I believe the dojo warning I'm seeing is from a datePicker that is on the form, but I will have to do some more research. Thanks again for all of your help. Tony Nelson Jesse Kuhnert wrote: What issue exactly is it that you see? If you could provide the exact text that is presented as the reason for the error as well as what input you gave it to produce the error I can be more helpful. On 5/14/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Grabbing today's latest build, I'm still seeing the same dojo validation issue. As a bonus, there is a new debug message: DEBUG: EXPERIMENTAL: dojo.i18n.number -- Not yet ready for use. APIs subject to change without notice. Happy Monday! Thanks in advance, Tony Nelson snipped - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
RE: I'm missing something obvious
This is a regression, the JIRA issue is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1071 -Original Message- From: Tony Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 6:57 PM To: Tapestry users Subject: I'm missing something obvious I have a simple form that includes this: input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:tradeId validators=validators:required,min=0,max=100 translator=translator:number,pattern=0 displayName=Trade ID / And no matter what legal numeric value I enter, I always get a validation error. Where is my typo? Because I certainly can't find it. I'm using yesterdays 4.1.2 snapshot. dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-annotations/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-65/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-contrib/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-68/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-framework/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-76/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency Thanks in advance for any help. Tony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I'm missing something obvious
Does that mean there is a fix floating around somewhere? Thanks Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a regression, the JIRA issue is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1071 -Original Message- From: Tony Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 6:57 PM To: Tapestry users Subject: I'm missing something obvious I have a simple form that includes this: input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:tradeId validators=validators:required,min=0,max=100 translator=translator:number,pattern=0 displayName=Trade ID / And no matter what legal numeric value I enter, I always get a validation error. Where is my typo? Because I certainly can't find it. I'm using yesterdays 4.1.2 snapshot. dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-annotations/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-65/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-contrib/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-68/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-framework/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-76/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency Thanks in advance for any help. Tony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I'm missing something obvious
I hadn't noticed this before. Yes a fix will go out tonight. On 5/11/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does that mean there is a fix floating around somewhere? Thanks Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a regression, the JIRA issue is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1071 -Original Message- From: Tony Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 6:57 PM To: Tapestry users Subject: I'm missing something obvious I have a simple form that includes this: input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:tradeId validators=validators:required,min=0,max=100 translator=translator:number,pattern=0 displayName=Trade ID / And no matter what legal numeric value I enter, I always get a validation error. Where is my typo? Because I certainly can't find it. I'm using yesterdays 4.1.2 snapshot. dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-annotations/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-65/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-contrib/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-68/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-framework/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-76/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency Thanks in advance for any help. Tony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
I'm missing something obvious
I have a simple form that includes this: input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:tradeId validators=validators:required,min=0,max=100 translator=translator:number,pattern=0 displayName=Trade ID / And no matter what legal numeric value I enter, I always get a validation error. Where is my typo? Because I certainly can't find it. I'm using yesterdays 4.1.2 snapshot. dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-annotations/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-65/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-contrib/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-68/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-framework/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-76/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency Thanks in advance for any help. Tony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I'm missing something obvious
What's the type of tradeId ? On 5/10/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a simple form that includes this: input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:tradeId validators=validators:required,min=0,max=100 translator=translator:number,pattern=0 displayName=Trade ID / And no matter what legal numeric value I enter, I always get a validation error. Where is my typo? Because I certainly can't find it. I'm using yesterdays 4.1.2 snapshot. dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-annotations/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-65/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-contrib/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-68/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-framework/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-76/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency Thanks in advance for any help. Tony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Andreas Andreou - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr Tapestry / Tacos developer Open Source / JEE Consulting
Re: I'm missing something obvious
Sorry, I should have supplied that in my original e-mail. public abstract Integer getTradeId(); Thanks again Tony Andreas Andreou wrote: What's the type of tradeId ? On 5/10/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a simple form that includes this: input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:tradeId validators=validators:required,min=0,max=100 translator=translator:number,pattern=0 displayName=Trade ID / And no matter what legal numeric value I enter, I always get a validation error. Where is my typo? Because I certainly can't find it. I'm using yesterdays 4.1.2 snapshot. dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-annotations/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-65/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-contrib/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-68/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-framework/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-76/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency Thanks in advance for any help. Tony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I'm missing something obvious
well... the code is correct... i even tried it myself! So, what kind of validation error you get? Client side? or server side? What happens if you disable javascript? On 5/11/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I should have supplied that in my original e-mail. public abstract Integer getTradeId(); Thanks again Tony Andreas Andreou wrote: What's the type of tradeId ? On 5/10/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a simple form that includes this: input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:tradeId validators=validators:required,min=0,max=100 translator=translator:number,pattern=0 displayName=Trade ID / And no matter what legal numeric value I enter, I always get a validation error. Where is my typo? Because I certainly can't find it. I'm using yesterdays 4.1.2 snapshot. dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-annotations/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-65/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-contrib/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-68/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-framework/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-76/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency Thanks in advance for any help. Tony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Andreas Andreou - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr Tapestry / Tacos developer Open Source / JEE Consulting
Re: I'm missing something obvious
Client side.. the nifty new dojo popup. If I disable client side validation it works fine, and I will do that for now.. but I'd really rather not. Thanks again Tony Andreas Andreou wrote: well... the code is correct... i even tried it myself! So, what kind of validation error you get? Client side? or server side? What happens if you disable javascript? On 5/11/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I should have supplied that in my original e-mail. public abstract Integer getTradeId(); Thanks again Tony Andreas Andreou wrote: What's the type of tradeId ? On 5/10/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a simple form that includes this: input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:tradeId validators=validators:required,min=0,max=100 translator=translator:number,pattern=0 displayName=Trade ID / And no matter what legal numeric value I enter, I always get a validation error. Where is my typo? Because I certainly can't find it. I'm using yesterdays 4.1.2 snapshot. dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-annotations/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-65/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-contrib/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-68/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency dependency groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-framework/artifactId version4.1.2-20070509.030104-76/version properties war.bundletrue/war.bundle /properties /dependency Thanks in advance for any help. Tony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
