Re: Noticed another stackoverflow question on Tapestry 5, go vote
True, But they have forgotten to ask if the original poster wants to use multiple databases, if so i wouldn't encourage using Tapestry (sigh). For me this is one of the biggest letdown's , i have written 2 apps in Tap 5.2 who both require access to multiple datasources, but the inability to use multiple databases (through tap-hibernate) has required me to do some hacking around to get this working. If i knew this beforehand i dont think i had choosen Tapestry.. On the other hand i think the framework is great and provides me with enough flexibilty to do what i want to do. -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Noticed-another-stackoverflow-question-on-Tapestry-5-go-vote-tp3377101p3377198.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Noticed another stackoverflow question on Tapestry 5, go vote
Hi antalk, You could use Tapestry and use many different datasources..., since tapestry is a presentation framework, I think you could just drop tapestry-hibernate. I 'm using tapestry backed up with pre-existent spring/hibernate beans and although I 'm not using it right now I think I could use many datasources if I wished. I know an application could be fully developed with tapestry using it's IoC and all it's modules and that's an advantage..., but being able to work with other widely-used frameworks like spring it's also an advantage. cheers! Nicolás.- On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:31 AM, antalk ant...@intercommit.nl wrote: True, But they have forgotten to ask if the original poster wants to use multiple databases, if so i wouldn't encourage using Tapestry (sigh). For me this is one of the biggest letdown's , i have written 2 apps in Tap 5.2 who both require access to multiple datasources, but the inability to use multiple databases (through tap-hibernate) has required me to do some hacking around to get this working. If i knew this beforehand i dont think i had choosen Tapestry.. On the other hand i think the framework is great and provides me with enough flexibilty to do what i want to do. -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Noticed-another-stackoverflow-question-on-Tapestry-5-go-vote-tp3377101p3377198.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Noticed another stackoverflow question on Tapestry 5, go vote
Hi, This isn't a Tapestry issue. I don't know anything about the tap-hibernate extension, but Tapestry itself isn't stopping you from accessing multiple databases. mrg On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:31 AM, antalk ant...@intercommit.nl wrote: True, But they have forgotten to ask if the original poster wants to use multiple databases, if so i wouldn't encourage using Tapestry (sigh). For me this is one of the biggest letdown's , i have written 2 apps in Tap 5.2 who both require access to multiple datasources, but the inability to use multiple databases (through tap-hibernate) has required me to do some hacking around to get this working. If i knew this beforehand i dont think i had choosen Tapestry.. On the other hand i think the framework is great and provides me with enough flexibilty to do what i want to do. -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Noticed-another-stackoverflow-question-on-Tapestry-5-go-vote-tp3377101p3377198.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
RE: Noticed another stackoverflow question on Tapestry 5, go vote
Bit of an odd statement! I'm using Hibernate with Spring and Tapestry and you can use multiple data sources with that solution. No hacking involved. I never have used Tapestry-Hibernate. -Original Message- From: antalk [mailto:ant...@intercommit.nl] Sent: 09 February 2011 08:32 To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: Re: Noticed another stackoverflow question on Tapestry 5, go vote True, But they have forgotten to ask if the original poster wants to use multiple databases, if so i wouldn't encourage using Tapestry (sigh). For me this is one of the biggest letdown's , i have written 2 apps in Tap 5.2 who both require access to multiple datasources, but the inability to use multiple databases (through tap-hibernate) has required me to do some hacking around to get this working. If i knew this beforehand i dont think i had choosen Tapestry.. On the other hand i think the framework is great and provides me with enough flexibilty to do what i want to do. -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Noticed-another-stackoverflow-ques tion-on-Tapestry-5-go-vote-tp3377101p3377198.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org ** Experience the British Library online at http://www.bl.uk/ The British Library’s new interactive Annual Report and Accounts 2009/10 : http://www.bl.uk/knowledge Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book. http://www.bl.uk/adoptabook The Library's St Pancras site is WiFi - enabled * The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify the mailto:postmas...@bl.uk : The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent. The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the author. * Think before you print - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Noticed another stackoverflow question on Tapestry 5, go vote
Same here. Using many Datasources. I even would say as much that tapestry caters really well for this as it allowed me through the use of a few simple custom services to inject my DAO's without ever having to worry about using the correct DS. I don't use tap-hibernate as I prefer to completely seperate my persistance from presentation. I personally don't like the thought of having to change my presentation tier (tapestry) if we choose to use a different persistance tier. my 2 cents, Joost On 9/02/11 3:08 PM, Newham, Cameron wrote: Bit of an odd statement! I'm using Hibernate with Spring and Tapestry and you can use multiple data sources with that solution. No hacking involved. I never have used Tapestry-Hibernate. -Original Message- From: antalk [mailto:ant...@intercommit.nl] Sent: 09 February 2011 08:32 To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: Re: Noticed another stackoverflow question on Tapestry 5, go vote True, But they have forgotten to ask if the original poster wants to use multiple databases, if so i wouldn't encourage using Tapestry (sigh). For me this is one of the biggest letdown's , i have written 2 apps in Tap 5.2 who both require access to multiple datasources, but the inability to use multiple databases (through tap-hibernate) has required me to do some hacking around to get this working. If i knew this beforehand i dont think i had choosen Tapestry.. On the other hand i think the framework is great and provides me with enough flexibilty to do what i want to do. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Noticed another stackoverflow question on Tapestry 5, go vote
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote: See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3831807/java-server-faces-2-0-or-tapestry-5-2. I love the marketing effort from the play framework guys, they are very serious about their play :) The given Tapestry answers given seem very reasonable. Here is another one thats a bit more recent: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4852472/help-selecting-java-component-based-web-framework While it might not be fair, I know that some people are using the number of questions and quality of answers on StackOverflow as part of their framework evaluation. If you want to promote Tapestry, it is probably worth following the Tapestry tag here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/tapestry In particular, vote up good questions and answers. There are a few vocal people who consistently mock anyone who says they are thinking about using Tapestry and doesn't hurt to have some other points of view contributing. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
