RE: Tynamo Federatedaccounts OpenID module coming up...
-Original Message- From: Kalle Korhonen [mailto:kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 10:07 PM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: Tynamo Federatedaccounts OpenID module coming up... >Yes, I can see that. Mostly I'm wondering if there's a use case for limiting >to certain openid providers only. It sure is. For example, I bet someone would like to support nothing but his own openid provider. Others might only want to support the most popular ones, like Google. This should be customizable. Borut answered the others. Regards. Jure 2012/3/26 Jure Jeseničnik : > First of all I hope that you find my contribution useful. I wish I could have > done more. Jure, absolutely useful. You had pretty much hammered the federatedaccounts-facebook code to do openid instead and I had changed some things around meanwhile, but I like starting from a functional implementation so I can keep testing it while I refactored it to follow the new form and for general use. Also, your contribution prodded me to actually start working on openid integration now rather than sometime later. > Regarding your questions: > 1) I would definitely like to see as many Id providers as possible or at > least a possibility to add as many as you would like. I'm pretty sure there > will be some users that will have the need to incorporate their own openId > server through the federatedaccounts component. > Yes, I can see that. Mostly I'm wondering if there's a use case for limiting to certain openid providers only. > 2) We do. We're currently using attributes like phone number and more. Ah, I knew it. Depending on the selected openid provider, that information may not be available. Do you not allow those that don't give you the information or you allow/make your users fill them in later? > 3) This part should be very flexible, so the designers could adjust this to > the look & feel of the surrounding application. We, for example would like to > use nothing but 16x16 icon for each supported provider. I would very much > like to achieve this by not having to tweak the tynamo-federatedaccount code > itself. If there was reasonable configurable component federatedaccounts-openid that allows tweaking the ui, would you use that or you'd rather just plug in your own openid UI component, overriding the built-in one? > I like the idea of using multiple openId components in order to achieve any > layout you want. I used this to combine the facebook/twitter components with > various different openId providers. > The situation where arbitrary openId provider used should be implemented with > some sort of adjustable popup with a input field to enter your openId > identity. Similar to a way that previously mentioned stackoverflow is using > but more compact. > Yes, the stackoverflow is a bit convoluted, although fairly comprehensive one. I'll take that as the UI foundation unless anybody can point to a better one. Anybody willing to point me to or collect openid badges to be used in the login component? Many openid providers have made and allow the use of their own logos, but the sizes don't necessarily match up nor confirm to the same style. Kalle > -Original Message- > From: Kalle Korhonen [mailto:kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 8:45 PM > To: Tapestry users > Subject: Tynamo Federatedaccounts OpenID module coming up... > > Based on the initial work of Jure Jesenicnik and Borut Bolcina > (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TYNAMO-123, thanks guys), I'm currently > working on adding OpenID to the list of Tynamo's federatedaccounts remote > authentication providers. Here's a few questions for those who care about > OpenID: > > 1) Do you typically use or would you like to use only selected OpenID > providers or is it the more, the better? > 2) Do you use attribute extensions - if so, what's important for you? > Names, roles or do you use some specific custom attributes? > 3) I've seen a few different implementations of openID provider selection > panels (i.e. who do you want to authenticate with). Would you like to have > them all listed, should it be drop-down by default? > Can you provide links to existing implementations to show what you'd like and > why? > 4) Do you have or do you foresee a need to customize OpenID authentication > flow or do you want to behave as much the same as possible with any given > provider? > 5) Bonus question for those who've used Guice. openid4java (the underlying > openid consumer implementation we are using at the moment) uses Guice 2.0, > any idea if Guice 2 and Guice 3.0 are at all compatible? Not sure I want to > fork openid4java at this point just to remove
Re: Tynamo Federatedaccounts OpenID module coming up...
Hello, Let me put my 2 cents in ... On 26. mar. 2012, at 22:06, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > 2012/3/26 Jure Jeseničnik : >> First of all I hope that you find my contribution useful. I wish I could >> have done more. > > Jure, absolutely useful. You had pretty much hammered the > federatedaccounts-facebook code to do openid instead and I had changed > some things around meanwhile, but I like starting from a functional > implementation so I can keep testing it while I refactored it to > follow the new form and for general use. Also, your contribution > prodded me to actually start working on openid integration now rather > than sometime later. > >> Regarding your questions: >> 1) I would definitely like to see as many Id providers as possible or at >> least a possibility to add as many as you would like. I'm pretty sure there >> will be some users that will have the need to incorporate their own openId >> server through the federatedaccounts component. >> > > Yes, I can see that. Mostly I'm wondering if there's a use case for > limiting to certain openid providers only. There is a list of openid providers at http://openid.net/get-an-openid/. Maybe there are some more, maybe Microsoft has moved forward to, but will have to google it. > >> 2) We do. We're currently using attributes like phone number and more. > > Ah, I knew it. Depending on the selected openid provider, that > information may not be available. Do you not allow those that don't > give you the information or you allow/make your users fill them in > later? > Some services require phone number and some not, so when you try to use them, you are required to provide the missing info, like phone number. >> 3) This part should be very flexible, so the designers could adjust this to >> the look & feel of the surrounding application. We, for example would like >> to use nothing but 16x16 icon for each supported provider. I would very much >> like to achieve this by not having to tweak the tynamo-federatedaccount code >> itself. > > If there was reasonable configurable component > federatedaccounts-openid that allows tweaking the ui, would you use > that or you'd rather just plug in your own openid UI component, > overriding the built-in one? The best solution would be if there was a reasonable default component which would be configurable via parameters and via css. > >> I like the idea of using multiple openId components in order to achieve any >> layout you want. I used this to combine the facebook/twitter components with >> various different openId providers. >> The situation where arbitrary openId provider used should be implemented >> with some sort of adjustable popup with a input field to enter your openId >> identity. Similar to a way that previously mentioned stackoverflow is using >> but more compact. >> > > Yes, the stackoverflow is a bit convoluted, although fairly > comprehensive one. I'll take that as the UI foundation unless anybody > can point to a better one. Anybody willing to point me to or collect > openid badges to be used in the login component? Many openid providers > have made and allow the use of their own logos, but the sizes don't > necessarily match up nor confirm to the same style. I think we can get hold of most icon sizes. > > Kalle > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Kalle Korhonen [mailto:kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 8:45 PM >> To: Tapestry users >> Subject: Tynamo Federatedaccounts OpenID module coming up... >> >> Based on the initial work of Jure Jesenicnik and Borut Bolcina >> (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TYNAMO-123, thanks guys), I'm currently >> working on adding OpenID to the list of Tynamo's federatedaccounts remote >> authentication providers. Here's a few questions for those who care about >> OpenID: >> >> 1) Do you typically use or would you like to use only selected OpenID >> providers or is it the more, the better? >> 2) Do you use attribute extensions - if so, what's important for you? >> Names, roles or do you use some specific custom attributes? >> 3) I've seen a few different implementations of openID provider selection >> panels (i.e. who do you want to authenticate with). Would you like to have >> them all listed, should it be drop-down by default? >> Can you provide links to existing implementations to show what you'd like >> and why? >> 4) Do you have or do you foresee a need to customize OpenID authenticati
Re: Tynamo Federatedaccounts OpenID module coming up...
2012/3/26 Jure Jeseničnik : > First of all I hope that you find my contribution useful. I wish I could have > done more. Jure, absolutely useful. You had pretty much hammered the federatedaccounts-facebook code to do openid instead and I had changed some things around meanwhile, but I like starting from a functional implementation so I can keep testing it while I refactored it to follow the new form and for general use. Also, your contribution prodded me to actually start working on openid integration now rather than sometime later. > Regarding your questions: > 1) I would definitely like to see as many Id providers as possible or at > least a possibility to add as many as you would like. I'm pretty sure there > will be some users that will have the need to incorporate their own openId > server through the federatedaccounts component. > Yes, I can see that. Mostly I'm wondering if there's a use case for limiting to certain openid providers only. > 2) We do. We're currently using attributes like phone number and more. Ah, I knew it. Depending on the selected openid provider, that information may not be available. Do you not allow those that don't give you the information or you allow/make your users fill them in later? > 3) This part should be very flexible, so the designers could adjust this to > the look & feel of the surrounding application. We, for example would like to > use nothing but 16x16 icon for each supported provider. I would very much > like to achieve this by not having to tweak the tynamo-federatedaccount code > itself. If there was reasonable configurable component federatedaccounts-openid that allows tweaking the ui, would you use that or you'd rather just plug in your own openid UI component, overriding the built-in one? > I like the idea of using multiple openId components in order to achieve any > layout you want. I used this to combine the facebook/twitter components with > various different openId providers. > The situation where arbitrary openId provider used should be implemented with > some sort of adjustable popup with a input field to enter your openId > identity. Similar to a way that previously mentioned stackoverflow is using > but more compact. > Yes, the stackoverflow is a bit convoluted, although fairly comprehensive one. I'll take that as the UI foundation unless anybody can point to a better one. Anybody willing to point me to or collect openid badges to be used in the login component? Many openid providers have made and allow the use of their own logos, but the sizes don't necessarily match up nor confirm to the same style. Kalle > -Original Message- > From: Kalle Korhonen [mailto:kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 8:45 PM > To: Tapestry users > Subject: Tynamo Federatedaccounts OpenID module coming up... > > Based on the initial work of Jure Jesenicnik and Borut Bolcina > (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TYNAMO-123, thanks guys), I'm currently > working on adding OpenID to the list of Tynamo's federatedaccounts remote > authentication providers. Here's a few questions for those who care about > OpenID: > > 1) Do you typically use or would you like to use only selected OpenID > providers or is it the more, the better? > 2) Do you use attribute extensions - if so, what's important for you? > Names, roles or do you use some specific custom attributes? > 3) I've seen a few different implementations of openID provider selection > panels (i.e. who do you want to authenticate with). Would you like to have > them all listed, should it be drop-down by default? > Can you provide links to existing implementations to show what you'd like and > why? > 4) Do you have or do you foresee a need to customize OpenID authentication > flow or do you want to behave as much the same as possible with any given > provider? > 5) Bonus question for those who've used Guice. openid4java (the underlying > openid consumer implementation we are using at the moment) uses Guice 2.0, > any idea if Guice 2 and Guice 3.0 are at all compatible? Not sure I want to > fork openid4java at this point just to remove the dependency to guice > (although I'm tempted...). > > Kalle > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
RE: Tynamo Federatedaccounts OpenID module coming up...
Hi Kalle. First of all I hope that you find my contribution useful. I wish I could have done more. Regarding your questions: 1) I would definitely like to see as many Id providers as possible or at least a possibility to add as many as you would like. I'm pretty sure there will be some users that will have the need to incorporate their own openId server through the federatedaccounts component. 2) We do. We're currently using attributes like phone number and more. 3) This part should be very flexible, so the designers could adjust this to the look & feel of the surrounding application. We, for example would like to use nothing but 16x16 icon for each supported provider. I would very much like to achieve this by not having to tweak the tynamo-federatedaccount code itself. I like the idea of using multiple openId components in order to achieve any layout you want. I used this to combine the facebook/twitter components with various different openId providers. The situation where arbitrary openId provider used should be implemented with some sort of adjustable popup with a input field to enter your openId identity. Similar to a way that previously mentioned stackoverflow is using but more compact. 4) It should be as similar as possible. Best regards, Jure -Original Message- From: Kalle Korhonen [mailto:kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 8:45 PM To: Tapestry users Subject: Tynamo Federatedaccounts OpenID module coming up... Based on the initial work of Jure Jesenicnik and Borut Bolcina (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TYNAMO-123, thanks guys), I'm currently working on adding OpenID to the list of Tynamo's federatedaccounts remote authentication providers. Here's a few questions for those who care about OpenID: 1) Do you typically use or would you like to use only selected OpenID providers or is it the more, the better? 2) Do you use attribute extensions - if so, what's important for you? Names, roles or do you use some specific custom attributes? 3) I've seen a few different implementations of openID provider selection panels (i.e. who do you want to authenticate with). Would you like to have them all listed, should it be drop-down by default? Can you provide links to existing implementations to show what you'd like and why? 4) Do you have or do you foresee a need to customize OpenID authentication flow or do you want to behave as much the same as possible with any given provider? 5) Bonus question for those who've used Guice. openid4java (the underlying openid consumer implementation we are using at the moment) uses Guice 2.0, any idea if Guice 2 and Guice 3.0 are at all compatible? Not sure I want to fork openid4java at this point just to remove the dependency to guice (although I'm tempted...). Kalle - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Tynamo Federatedaccounts OpenID module coming up...
Sorry, don't know of any such site. :) regards Taha On Mar 23, 2012, at 11:53 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > Right right, but are the any lives sites using this you can point me > to? I'm mostly concerned about the ui and I spent some time trying to > find a site that uses this but since the sites don't really advertise > what they are using and I don't know beforehand how it looks like, > it's kind of difficult to spot them. > > Kalle > > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Taha Hafeez Siddiqi > wrote: >> >> Hi Kalle >> >> There is an omniauth-openid integration >> >> https://github.com/intridea/omniauth-openid >> >> http://blog.sethladd.com/2010/09/ruby-rails-openid-and-google.html >> >> regards >> Taha >> >> >> On Mar 22, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Taha Hafeez Siddiqi >>> wrote: In rails, https://github.com/intridea/omniauth is popular. Would love to see something like that in tapestry. >>> >>> Thanks Taha. Do you know of any live examples with omniauth & openid? >>> >>> Kalle >>> >>> On Mar 22, 2012, at 1:41 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:45:05 -0300, Kalle Korhonen > wrote: > >> Based on the initial work of Jure Jesenicnik and Borut Bolcina >> (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TYNAMO-123, thanks guys), I'm >> currently working on adding OpenID to the list of Tynamo's >> federatedaccounts remote authentication providers. > > Yay! Thank you all very much! :) > >> Here's a few questions for those who care about OpenID: >> 1) Do you typically use or would you like to use only selected OpenID >> providers or is it the more, the better? > > I'd go with easy way to select the most popular, but still an option to > use others. > >> 3) I've seen a few different implementations of openID provider >> selection panels (i.e. who do you want to authenticate with). Would >> you like to have them all listed, should it be drop-down by default? >> Can you provide links to existing implementations to show what you'd >> like and why? > > I do like the Stack Overflow one: http://stackoverflow.com/users/login. > >> 4) Do you have or do you foresee a need to customize OpenID >> authentication flow or do you want to behave as much the same as >> possible with any given provider? > > I'd guess the second option we'll be the best for 90% of the projects. > >> 5) Bonus question for those who've used Guice. openid4java (the >> underlying openid consumer implementation we are using at the moment) >> uses Guice 2.0, any idea if Guice 2 and Guice 3.0 are at all >> compatible? Not sure I want to fork openid4java at this point just to >> remove the dependency to guice (although I'm tempted...). > > And replacing it with Tapestry-IoC? :) > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, > and instructor > Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. > http://www.arsmachina.com.br > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >>> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Tynamo Federatedaccounts OpenID module coming up...
Right right, but are the any lives sites using this you can point me to? I'm mostly concerned about the ui and I spent some time trying to find a site that uses this but since the sites don't really advertise what they are using and I don't know beforehand how it looks like, it's kind of difficult to spot them. Kalle On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Taha Hafeez Siddiqi wrote: > > Hi Kalle > > There is an omniauth-openid integration > > https://github.com/intridea/omniauth-openid > > http://blog.sethladd.com/2010/09/ruby-rails-openid-and-google.html > > regards > Taha > > > On Mar 22, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Taha Hafeez Siddiqi >> wrote: >>> In rails, https://github.com/intridea/omniauth is popular. Would love to >>> see something like that in tapestry. >> >> Thanks Taha. Do you know of any live examples with omniauth & openid? >> >> Kalle >> >> >>> On Mar 22, 2012, at 1:41 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote: >>> On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:45:05 -0300, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > Based on the initial work of Jure Jesenicnik and Borut Bolcina > (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TYNAMO-123, thanks guys), I'm > currently working on adding OpenID to the list of Tynamo's > federatedaccounts remote authentication providers. Yay! Thank you all very much! :) > Here's a few questions for those who care about OpenID: > 1) Do you typically use or would you like to use only selected OpenID > providers or is it the more, the better? I'd go with easy way to select the most popular, but still an option to use others. > 3) I've seen a few different implementations of openID provider > selection panels (i.e. who do you want to authenticate with). Would > you like to have them all listed, should it be drop-down by default? > Can you provide links to existing implementations to show what you'd > like and why? I do like the Stack Overflow one: http://stackoverflow.com/users/login. > 4) Do you have or do you foresee a need to customize OpenID > authentication flow or do you want to behave as much the same as > possible with any given provider? I'd guess the second option we'll be the best for 90% of the projects. > 5) Bonus question for those who've used Guice. openid4java (the > underlying openid consumer implementation we are using at the moment) > uses Guice 2.0, any idea if Guice 2 and Guice 3.0 are at all > compatible? Not sure I want to fork openid4java at this point just to > remove the dependency to guice (although I'm tempted...). And replacing it with Tapestry-IoC? :) -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and instructor Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. http://www.arsmachina.com.br - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Tynamo Federatedaccounts OpenID module coming up...
Hi Kalle There is an omniauth-openid integration https://github.com/intridea/omniauth-openid http://blog.sethladd.com/2010/09/ruby-rails-openid-and-google.html regards Taha On Mar 22, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Taha Hafeez Siddiqi > wrote: >> In rails, https://github.com/intridea/omniauth is popular. Would love to see >> something like that in tapestry. > > Thanks Taha. Do you know of any live examples with omniauth & openid? > > Kalle > > >> On Mar 22, 2012, at 1:41 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:45:05 -0300, Kalle Korhonen >>> wrote: >>> Based on the initial work of Jure Jesenicnik and Borut Bolcina (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TYNAMO-123, thanks guys), I'm currently working on adding OpenID to the list of Tynamo's federatedaccounts remote authentication providers. >>> >>> Yay! Thank you all very much! :) >>> Here's a few questions for those who care about OpenID: 1) Do you typically use or would you like to use only selected OpenID providers or is it the more, the better? >>> >>> I'd go with easy way to select the most popular, but still an option to use >>> others. >>> 3) I've seen a few different implementations of openID provider selection panels (i.e. who do you want to authenticate with). Would you like to have them all listed, should it be drop-down by default? Can you provide links to existing implementations to show what you'd like and why? >>> >>> I do like the Stack Overflow one: http://stackoverflow.com/users/login. >>> 4) Do you have or do you foresee a need to customize OpenID authentication flow or do you want to behave as much the same as possible with any given provider? >>> >>> I'd guess the second option we'll be the best for 90% of the projects. >>> 5) Bonus question for those who've used Guice. openid4java (the underlying openid consumer implementation we are using at the moment) uses Guice 2.0, any idea if Guice 2 and Guice 3.0 are at all compatible? Not sure I want to fork openid4java at this point just to remove the dependency to guice (although I'm tempted...). >>> >>> And replacing it with Tapestry-IoC? :) >>> >>> -- >>> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo >>> Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, >>> and instructor >>> Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. >>> http://www.arsmachina.com.br >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >>> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >
Re: Tynamo Federatedaccounts OpenID module coming up...
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Taha Hafeez Siddiqi wrote: > In rails, https://github.com/intridea/omniauth is popular. Would love to see > something like that in tapestry. Thanks Taha. Do you know of any live examples with omniauth & openid? Kalle > On Mar 22, 2012, at 1:41 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote: > >> On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:45:05 -0300, Kalle Korhonen >> wrote: >> >>> Based on the initial work of Jure Jesenicnik and Borut Bolcina >>> (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TYNAMO-123, thanks guys), I'm >>> currently working on adding OpenID to the list of Tynamo's >>> federatedaccounts remote authentication providers. >> >> Yay! Thank you all very much! :) >> >>> Here's a few questions for those who care about OpenID: >>> 1) Do you typically use or would you like to use only selected OpenID >>> providers or is it the more, the better? >> >> I'd go with easy way to select the most popular, but still an option to use >> others. >> >>> 3) I've seen a few different implementations of openID provider >>> selection panels (i.e. who do you want to authenticate with). Would >>> you like to have them all listed, should it be drop-down by default? >>> Can you provide links to existing implementations to show what you'd >>> like and why? >> >> I do like the Stack Overflow one: http://stackoverflow.com/users/login. >> >>> 4) Do you have or do you foresee a need to customize OpenID >>> authentication flow or do you want to behave as much the same as >>> possible with any given provider? >> >> I'd guess the second option we'll be the best for 90% of the projects. >> >>> 5) Bonus question for those who've used Guice. openid4java (the >>> underlying openid consumer implementation we are using at the moment) >>> uses Guice 2.0, any idea if Guice 2 and Guice 3.0 are at all >>> compatible? Not sure I want to fork openid4java at this point just to >>> remove the dependency to guice (although I'm tempted...). >> >> And replacing it with Tapestry-IoC? :) >> >> -- >> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo >> Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and >> instructor >> Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. >> http://www.arsmachina.com.br >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Tynamo Federatedaccounts OpenID module coming up...
Hi In rails, https://github.com/intridea/omniauth is popular. Would love to see something like that in tapestry. regards Taha On Mar 22, 2012, at 1:41 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:45:05 -0300, Kalle Korhonen > wrote: > >> Based on the initial work of Jure Jesenicnik and Borut Bolcina >> (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TYNAMO-123, thanks guys), I'm >> currently working on adding OpenID to the list of Tynamo's >> federatedaccounts remote authentication providers. > > Yay! Thank you all very much! :) > >> Here's a few questions for those who care about OpenID: >> 1) Do you typically use or would you like to use only selected OpenID >> providers or is it the more, the better? > > I'd go with easy way to select the most popular, but still an option to use > others. > >> 3) I've seen a few different implementations of openID provider >> selection panels (i.e. who do you want to authenticate with). Would >> you like to have them all listed, should it be drop-down by default? >> Can you provide links to existing implementations to show what you'd >> like and why? > > I do like the Stack Overflow one: http://stackoverflow.com/users/login. > >> 4) Do you have or do you foresee a need to customize OpenID >> authentication flow or do you want to behave as much the same as >> possible with any given provider? > > I'd guess the second option we'll be the best for 90% of the projects. > >> 5) Bonus question for those who've used Guice. openid4java (the >> underlying openid consumer implementation we are using at the moment) >> uses Guice 2.0, any idea if Guice 2 and Guice 3.0 are at all >> compatible? Not sure I want to fork openid4java at this point just to >> remove the dependency to guice (although I'm tempted...). > > And replacing it with Tapestry-IoC? :) > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and > instructor > Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. > http://www.arsmachina.com.br > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >
Re: Tynamo Federatedaccounts OpenID module coming up...
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:45:05 -0300, Kalle Korhonen wrote: Based on the initial work of Jure Jesenicnik and Borut Bolcina (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TYNAMO-123, thanks guys), I'm currently working on adding OpenID to the list of Tynamo's federatedaccounts remote authentication providers. Yay! Thank you all very much! :) Here's a few questions for those who care about OpenID: 1) Do you typically use or would you like to use only selected OpenID providers or is it the more, the better? I'd go with easy way to select the most popular, but still an option to use others. 3) I've seen a few different implementations of openID provider selection panels (i.e. who do you want to authenticate with). Would you like to have them all listed, should it be drop-down by default? Can you provide links to existing implementations to show what you'd like and why? I do like the Stack Overflow one: http://stackoverflow.com/users/login. 4) Do you have or do you foresee a need to customize OpenID authentication flow or do you want to behave as much the same as possible with any given provider? I'd guess the second option we'll be the best for 90% of the projects. 5) Bonus question for those who've used Guice. openid4java (the underlying openid consumer implementation we are using at the moment) uses Guice 2.0, any idea if Guice 2 and Guice 3.0 are at all compatible? Not sure I want to fork openid4java at this point just to remove the dependency to guice (although I'm tempted...). And replacing it with Tapestry-IoC? :) -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and instructor Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. http://www.arsmachina.com.br - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Tynamo Federatedaccounts OpenID module coming up...
Based on the initial work of Jure Jesenicnik and Borut Bolcina (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TYNAMO-123, thanks guys), I'm currently working on adding OpenID to the list of Tynamo's federatedaccounts remote authentication providers. Here's a few questions for those who care about OpenID: 1) Do you typically use or would you like to use only selected OpenID providers or is it the more, the better? 2) Do you use attribute extensions - if so, what's important for you? Names, roles or do you use some specific custom attributes? 3) I've seen a few different implementations of openID provider selection panels (i.e. who do you want to authenticate with). Would you like to have them all listed, should it be drop-down by default? Can you provide links to existing implementations to show what you'd like and why? 4) Do you have or do you foresee a need to customize OpenID authentication flow or do you want to behave as much the same as possible with any given provider? 5) Bonus question for those who've used Guice. openid4java (the underlying openid consumer implementation we are using at the moment) uses Guice 2.0, any idea if Guice 2 and Guice 3.0 are at all compatible? Not sure I want to fork openid4java at this point just to remove the dependency to guice (although I'm tempted...). Kalle - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
