Question about deployment of web app
Hi, allI am using Tomcat 5.5.15 on Window 2000 server. My web app worked well before reinstallation of Window2000. After reinstallation, I set up the same java environment with the same tomcat version. But a problem comes in the deployment of my former well-working app. In the tomcat log, I got the following message:2006-2-14 15:57:47 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDescriptorError deploying configuration descriptor myApp.xmljava.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptor(HostConfig.java:576) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployApps(HostConfig.java:493) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.check (HostConfig.java:1195) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) at org.apache.commons.modeler.BaseModelMBean.invoke(BaseModelMBean.java:503) at com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.DynamicMetaDataImpl.invoke (DynamicMetaDataImpl.java:213) at com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.MetaDataImpl.invoke(MetaDataImpl.java:220) at com.sun.jmx.interceptor.DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.invoke(DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.java:815) at com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.JmxMBeanServer.invoke(JmxMBeanServer.java:784) at org.apache.catalina.manager.ManagerServlet.check(ManagerServlet.java:1377) at org.apache.catalina.manager.ManagerServlet.deploy (ManagerServlet.java:814) at org.apache.catalina.manager.HTMLManagerServlet.deployInternal(HTMLManagerServlet.java:248) at org.apache.catalina.manager.HTMLManagerServlet.doGet(HTMLManagerServlet.java:95) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:689) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java :252) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:173) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:213) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke (StandardContextValve.java:178) at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:524) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:126) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:105) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:107) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service (CoyoteAdapter.java:148) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:869) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java :667) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run (ThreadPool.java:684) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)2006-2-14 15:57:47 org.apache.catalina.startup.ContextConfig applicationWebConfigMessage: Missing application web.xml, using defaults only StandardEngine[Catalina].StandardHost[localhost].StandardContext[/myApp] It is really strange since I didn't change any codes in my web app including web.xml under WEB-INF. It worked well before the reinstallation, but fail to deploy after the reinstallation. What is the possible wrong? My web.xml is attached. Thanks for any suggestions. http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-app_2_4.xsd"; version="2.4"> A test servlet application Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] test org.myapp.servlet.TestServlet test /servlet/test - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Setting up a parallel test environment on the same machine as main server
On Sunday 12 February 2006 17:07, Alan Chandler wrote: ... > Unless anyone here can suggest a better way, I would like to move the > JkMountFile directive from global scope to virtual host scope and have two > separate files urimap files so that I can map different things dependent on > which virtual host. > > However, since this is a live site I don't want to just conduct the simple > experiment to see if will work, so I am asking here if this is OK. Is there really nobody on this list who can answer this simple question? ... > However, I don't fully understand the relationship between , > and stanza's in the server.xml file, and until I do, I am > reluctant to muck about with it and potentially screw the currently working > arrangement. Specifically, there was some conversation here about it best that if tomcat was running on the same box as the web server (which it is in my case) that it would be best to make the connection between apache2 and tomcat be via localhost. That being the case, how can I map the SAME servlet name but from a different virtual host (albeit ip based) on apache to DIFFERENT hosts on the same tomcat engine. -- Alan Chandler http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk Open Source. It's the difference between trust and antitrust. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat 5.5 documentation: how to update website?
Hi all Just spent time getting the Tomcat5.sh script to work as a daemon under linux following the advice on the url:- "The Apache Tomcat 5.5 Servlet/JSP Container" http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/setup.html "The file $CATALINA_HOME/bin/jsvc/native/tomcat.sh can be used as a template for starting Tomcat automatically at boot time from /etc/ init.d. The file is currently setup for running Tomcat 4.1.x, so it is necessary to edit it and change the classname from BootstrapService to Bootstrap." If only I'd known catalina.sh works 'out of the box' :-) How can I update this page to help let people know there's an easier option to get Tomcat using a startup script with catalina.sh rather than tomcat5.sh? Many thanks Steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Blocking AJP13 (port 8009) access
Try adding address="127.0.0.1" to the ajp13 tag in server.xml, and configuring apache to connect to 127.0.0.1 if you haven't already. This should stop the ajp13 port from being visable to other machines. As far as iptables goes, you probably want -o lo -j ACCEPT at the top of the ruleset, and I'm really not sure why you're using state flags to attempt to block external access to port 8009. Mostly you don't want drop rules to check the state table, though this might be some iptablism, I'm not too familiar with it past basic NAT / port blocking. -Antony On 2/14/06, OG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to block external access to port 8009 (AJP13), as only my local > host really needs to be able to talk to it. > I'm wondering if there are any internal/mod_jk mechanisms for that, or if > iptables is the best option. > > I have tried iptables, which did block external requests, but it also got > me in a situation where I had a few hundred httpd processes in a SYN_SENT > state ( netstat | grep 8009 | grep -c SYN_SENT ) and returning 503s instead > of 200s: > > iptables -A INPUT \ > -p TCP --dport 8009 \ > -m state --state NEW \ > -j DROP > iptables -A INPUT \ > -p UDP --dport 8009 \ > -m state --state NEW \ > -j DROP > > iptables -A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPT > iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT > > > If anyone has iptables rules that work, I'd appreciate it if you could > share them. > > I'd also be curious to know whether people use some other mechanisms to > prevent evil folks from connecting to your port 8009 from the outsite and > consuming your available connections. > > Thanks, > Otis > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
Re: Blocking AJP13 (port 8009) access
OG wrote: Hi, I'm trying to block external access to port 8009 (AJP13), as only my local host really needs to be able to talk to it. I'm wondering if there are any internal/mod_jk mechanisms for that, or if iptables is the best option. If anyone has iptables rules that work, I'd appreciate it if you could share them. Take a look at: http://www.linuxguruz.com/iptables/ For example: http://www.linuxguruz.com/iptables/scripts/rc.firewall.txt will make a simple firewall allowing only ports 21,22,80 and 133, etc... Just adjust you network IP's. Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Trouble accessing Resources in my Context
I've got my servlet working now, without resorting to using a Context element inside the server.xml. I found that putting the Context in $TOMCAT_HOME/conf/Catalina/localhost/jackrabbit_config_test.xml works fine. factory="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.jndi.BindableRepositoryFactory" configFilePath="conf/repository_model1.xml" repHomeDir="shared/jackrabbit_model1" /> name="sharedJCRRepository" global="jcr/model2Repository" type="javax.jcr.Repository" /> And then in my web app, I have these lines: Jackrabbit Model 1 Repository jcr/model1Repository javax.jcr.Repository Container Jackrabbit Model 2 Repository sharedJCRRepositoryname> javax.jcr.Repositoryref-type> Test Number testNum java.lang.Integer Container I also finally realized that the 's name attribute can't be the same as the the global attribute. That took care of the null pointer I was getting trying to access that object. So, while this works acceptably (the context information for the webapp is not included in server.xml), I would *much* prefer to use the WEB-INF/context.xml the Tomcat docs say I can (the fourth bullet on this page - http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/ context.html). If someone could explain why that doesn't work, I'd be really appreciative. Is this possibly a known issue? Thanks, Mark On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:40 PM, Mark Slater wrote: I've solved part of the problem... or at least made it less complicated (I hope). The ClassNotFound exception mentioned at the bottom is due to the jackrabbit jars being located in server/lib as opposed to common/lib. I'd placed them in server lib on the advice of someone more familiar with jackrabbit than I. I'd assumed that, as long as the jar was included in the web app, this would not be a problem; obviously that was incorrect. So after putting jackrabbit and its dependencies in common/lib, here's what I've got: If the context for web-app only resources and environment variables (jcr/model1Repository and testNum in the code below) are placed in in $TOMCAT_HOME/conf/server.xml, the web app is able to find them. If they are placed in the web-app's WEB-INF/context.xml, an exception is thrown (javax.naming.NamingException: Cannot create resource instance). As the latter is definitely the preferred option (by tomcat documentation and myself), I'd really like to get that to work. I've also confirmed that I get the same errors on a newly downloaded and configured Tomcat 5.5.15. Mark On Feb 13, 2006, at 6:23 PM, Mark Slater wrote: I'm running Tomcat 5.5.9 with JVM 1.5.0_05-83 on MacOS X 10.4.4. I'm trying to build an example webapp that shows the configuration for two Jackrabbit resources: one configured as an embedded resource for that web app and another configured as a shared resource for the entire host. I've tried to define the resources in a variety of places and haven't been able to get any of them to work. My context files are defined like this $TOMCAT_HOME/conf/context.xml: WEB-INF/web.xml webapp/WEB-INF/context.xml: factory="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.jndi.BindableRepositoryFactory" configFilePath="conf/repository_model1.xml" repHomeDir="shared/jackrabbit_model1" /> I've got the following setup in server.xml: ... factory="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.jndi.BindableRepositoryFactory" configFilePath="conf/repository_model2.xml" repHomeDir="shared/jackrabbit_model2" /> And in my web.xml, I've got the following references: ... Jackrabbit Model 1 Repository jcr/model1Repository javax.jcr.Repository Container Jackrabbit Model 2 Repository jcr/model2Repositoryref-name> javax.jcr.Repositoryref-type> Test Number testNum java.lang.Integer Container I know tomcat is finding the jcr/model2Repository resource because if I delete all of the database entries and repository files, and then restart Tomcat, upon restart the database and repository files are recreated. There's also log output in catalina.out about jackrabbit initializing itself for the model2Repository. When I get to my servlet, I've got some code that prints the context entries for the initial context and the environment's context to the output webpage. Then I try to access both repositories. For good measure, I also try to access the testNum I defined in my webapp's context.xml. None of the objects are accessible. The locally defined objects (those in webapp/WEB-INF/ context.xml) throw an exception: javax.naming.NamingException: Cannot create resource instance at org.apache.naming.factory.ResourceEnvFactory.getObjectInstance
Re: Tomcat 5.5 documentation: how to update website?
> > From: Steve Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/02/14 Tue AM 03:50:19 EST > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Tomcat 5.5 documentation: how to update website? > > Hi all > > Just spent time getting the Tomcat5.sh script to work as a daemon > under linux following the advice on the url:- > > > "The Apache Tomcat 5.5 Servlet/JSP Container" > http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/setup.html > > > "The file $CATALINA_HOME/bin/jsvc/native/tomcat.sh can be used as a > template for starting Tomcat automatically at boot time from /etc/ > init.d. The file is currently setup for running Tomcat 4.1.x, so it > is necessary to edit it and change the classname from > BootstrapService to Bootstrap." > > > If only I'd known catalina.sh works 'out of the box' :-) Section 1 of the docs - under the "Directories and Files" heading, second paragraph - "These are some of the key tomcat directories all relative to $CATALINA_HOME ./bin - Startup, shutdown, and other scripts. The *.sh files (for Unix systems) are functional duplicates of the *.bat files (for Windows systems). Since the Win32 command-line lacks certain functionality, there are some additional files in here." HOWEVER - you're better off for having used jsvc. "Out of the box" scrips run tc as root user. > > How can I update this page to help let people know there's an easier > option to get Tomcat using a startup script with catalina.sh rather > than tomcat5.sh? > > > Many thanks > > Steve > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5.5 documentation: how to update website?
On 14 Feb 2006, at 11:05, Warren Pace wrote: From: Steve Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 2006/02/14 Tue AM 03:50:19 EST To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Tomcat 5.5 documentation: how to update website? Hi all Just spent time getting the Tomcat5.sh script to work as a daemon under linux following the advice on the url:- "The Apache Tomcat 5.5 Servlet/JSP Container" http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/setup.html "The file $CATALINA_HOME/bin/jsvc/native/tomcat.sh can be used as a template for starting Tomcat automatically at boot time from /etc/ init.d. The file is currently setup for running Tomcat 4.1.x, so it is necessary to edit it and change the classname from BootstrapService to Bootstrap." If only I'd known catalina.sh works 'out of the box' :-) Section 1 of the docs - under the "Directories and Files" heading, second paragraph - "These are some of the key tomcat directories all relative to $CATALINA_HOME ./bin - Startup, shutdown, and other scripts. The *.sh files (for Unix systems) are functional duplicates of the *.bat files (for Windows systems). Since the Win32 command-line lacks certain functionality, there are some additional files in here." HOWEVER - you're better off for having used jsvc. "Out of the box" scrips run tc as root user. Thanks Warren :-) I guess I was overwhelmed with the sheer number of config files/ directories involved :) (startup.sh, catalina.sh, tomcat.sh?) All sorted now though. How can I update this page to help let people know there's an easier option to get Tomcat using a startup script with catalina.sh rather than tomcat5.sh? Many thanks Steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with tomcat
when ever i am calling the jsp page Instead of it its code is been opening in notepad.So can any body tell me the solution - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Setting up a parallel test environment on the same machine as main server
1. Moving the JkMount directive inside a will make it accesible from only that virtual host. So, you must repeat common ones, such as /jkmanager. I put the mappings (JkMount(s)) right in the virtual host definition(s) with no trouble at all. 2. The virtual host is determined by the http host header, not by the connector host name. This is true for both httpd and tomcat (and any other web server.) You can always install Apache httpd + Tomcat on a second machine (or on the same machine on a separate set of ports), if you are reluctant to try it on you production host. HTH, Tim -Original Message- From: Alan Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 3:50 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Setting up a parallel test environment on the same machine as main server On Sunday 12 February 2006 17:07, Alan Chandler wrote: ... > Unless anyone here can suggest a better way, I would like to move the > JkMountFile directive from global scope to virtual host scope and have > two separate files urimap files so that I can map different things > dependent on which virtual host. > > However, since this is a live site I don't want to just conduct the > simple experiment to see if will work, so I am asking here if this is > OK. Is there really nobody on this list who can answer this simple question? ... > However, I don't fully understand the relationship between , > and stanza's in the server.xml file, and until I do, I > am reluctant to muck about with it and potentially screw the currently > working arrangement. Specifically, there was some conversation here about it best that if tomcat was running on the same box as the web server (which it is in my case) that it would be best to make the connection between apache2 and tomcat be via localhost. That being the case, how can I map the SAME servlet name but from a different virtual host (albeit ip based) on apache to DIFFERENT hosts on the same tomcat engine. -- Alan Chandler http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk Open Source. It's the difference between trust and antitrust. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat 5.0.28 Sending content that does not match the URL
Hi All, I am experiencing strange problems with Tomcat 5.0.28. The problem is that sometimes (1 out of 10) when I load a JSP Tomcat seems to send the wrong stylesheets for a certain url. This problem occurs when serving them using a servlet and a CMS but also if they are located on the harddrive and accessed directly by tomcat. I am using a server with an Intel Xeon 3.20 Ghz and 4GB of ram on Windows Server 2003 hyperthreading is enabled. I have used Fiddler to see what goes on when I request a page. Each page has about 10 stylesheets attached. When the problem occurs, the page looks like crap in the browser, inspecting it using Fiddler I can see that there is at least one css file (it might be coincidence that it goes wrong with a stylesheet) that contains the content of the next one that was requested. So the content of the next item that was requested is the same as the one requested before that. For example the layout.css might contain the actual content of the main_content.css if the layout.css was requested before the main_content.css. This behaviour occurs when serving the content using a third party servlet (Mediasurface binary servlet) or serving it using Tomcat. Does anyone have an idea how I can prevent this from happening or what might be wrong? Kind regards, Marcel Schot
RE: Trouble accessing Resources in my Context
> From: Mark Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Trouble accessing Resources in my Context > > So, while this works acceptably (the context information for the > webapp is not included in server.xml), I would *much* prefer to use > the WEB-INF/context.xml the Tomcat docs say I can (the fourth bullet > on this page - http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/ > context.html). If someone could explain why that doesn't > work, I'd be really appreciative. Is this possibly a known issue? Read what the bullet actually says, not what you think it says: if the previous file was not found for this application, in individual file at /META-INF/context.xml inside the application files What directory does it really specify? (Hint: it's not WEB-INF.) - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: c:forEach not working as expected
--- Reinhard Moosauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> it seemed clear to me, that this construct:
>
>
> ... (some inner logic)
>
>
> should be equivalent to this one:
No. It is roughly equvalent to (see my corrections):
> <%
> for (Iterator it=t.getRecords(); it.hasNext(); ) {
for (Iterator it=t.getRecords().getIterator(); it.hasNext(); ) {
> String x = (String)it.next();
Object x = it.next();
> %>
> ... (some inner logic)
> <% }
> %>
I said roughly, because it can handle arrays, too.
> But the forEach-version is not working as expected. What can be wrong?
> Here are some quite strange effects:
> 1. The iterators-method "hasNext()" is called twice for every iteration
> (ok: no problem, if the iterator is clean, but why?)
This is normal. Try to locate the java code generated from that tag and see
what it comes to. You'll see something educational. There is no "while ()"
loop. Just "if () else" logic.
> 2. The loop-body is executed after hasNext() returned false.
> But the next()-method is NOT called ??
That would be strange.
Nix.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: App will work on localhost but blank on client PC.
How does localhost resolve in that scenario...why not use the hostname or ip address Alexander Alekseev wrote: I have a 2K3 Server on our intranet running Trend InterScan Messaging Security Suite which uses Apache Tomcat. I can access this app on the server through http://localhost:8447/ just fine. But when we try to access this app through a client connected to the 2k3s, we get a blank page with no error message, just one line of characters: _ [1][1] We've searched through Trend's support for this product and they don't have any suggestions except to make sure the redirects from IIS are there, which they are. Beyond that, they barely even mention Tomcat, so does anyone have an idea what may be wrong? -- Mike Sabroff Web Services Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 920-568-8379 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: context error
Then do that jacky wrote: > > hi, > When i add a Context in the server.xml, an error occurs: > > Apache Tomcat/4.1.31 > Catalina.start: LifecycleException: Context startup failed due to > previous errors > LifecycleException: Context startup failed due to previous errors > at > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(StandardContext.java:3578) > at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1141) > at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.start(StandardHost.java:707) > at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1141) > at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine.start(StandardEngine.java:316) > at > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService.start(StandardService.java:450) > at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.start(StandardServer.java:2143) > at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(Catalina.java:463) > at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.execute(Catalina.java:350) > at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.process(Catalina.java:129) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) > at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:156) > Stopping service Tomcat-Standalone > Catalina.stop: LifecycleException: Coyote connector has not been started > LifecycleException: Coyote connector has not been started > at > org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector.stop(CoyoteConnector.java:1296) > at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService.stop(StandardService.java:499) > at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.stop(StandardServer.java:2178) > at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(Catalina.java:494) > at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.execute(Catalina.java:350) > at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.process(Catalina.java:129) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) > at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:156) > > If i remove the added context, tomcat will start. > In fact, i rearrange the directories, i don't know if this will impact > on the Context. If i put all directories under $CATALINA_HOME, tomcat > will work well with the Context. > > $CATALINA_HOME/bin/ > shared/ > server/ > > $CATALINA_BASE/bin/ > conf/ > webapps/ > logs/ > work/ > > Context is as following: > > > Best Regards. > jacky > -- Mike Sabroff Web Services Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 920-568-8379 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JAASRealm and LoginContext reuse
I found that the JAASRealm implementation (org.apache.catalina.realm.JAASRealm) does not reuse the LoginContext (javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext) instance. Every time the authenticate(String,String) method is called a new LoginContext instance is created. Creating a new instance of the LoginContext will result in creating a new instance of all LoginModule's configured for this application. In other words, for each login a new instance of the LoginModule is created. However, in my case the initialization of the login module is an expensive operation. The only way to resolve this is to write a custom JAASRealm implementation. However, before doing this I would like to know whether there is any rational of not caching the LoginContext instance. I looked in the JAAS spec and could find anything against caching the LoginContext. I've also looked at LoginContext source code in JDK 1.4 and it appears to be written to cache the LoginModule instances. So I would assume it is correct to write a custom version of the JAASRealm to operate on a single instance of the LoginContext. Am I right? I would appreciate any thoughts. Thanks Stefan Baramov Software Developer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
default webapp not understanding
Hello, I am having trouble understanding what is meant by the default webapp. Here goes. I have a site which I have a dns entry for. After reading the docs, I put the application under $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/mywebapp In the server.xml I added this snippet: Now when I hit my site with the dns which points to my IP addrss for this box, it goes to a index.html file in the $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/root It does not go to the index.html in the $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/mywebapp/index.html Can I somehow configure this to go to the above $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/mywebapp/index.html? I get confused when the doc states that the entry in the host must also have a context entry? Can anyone clarify that. Here from the docs Exactly one of the Hosts associated with each Engine MUST have a name matching the defaultHost attribute of that Engine. My big deal is to somehow get the index.jsp in the $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/mywebapp to be called automatically when I hit my url. Thanks,
RE: default webapp not understanding
> From: Scott Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: default webapp not understanding > > I am having trouble understanding what is meant by the default webapp. (It would help if you'd tell us what Tomcat level you're running...) For 5.5.x, the default webapp is the one located in webapps/ROOT.war or the webapps/ROOT directory. > Can I somehow configure this to go to the above > $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/mywebapp/index.html? Deploy your webapp in webapps/ROOT, not webapps/mywebapp. > I get confused when the doc states that the entry in the host > must also have a context entry? Can anyone clarify that. Where does it say that? The current doc states that you _can_ nest tags inside , not that you must. Putting tags in server.xml is strongly discouraged these days, but not all of the doc has caught up to that fact. > Here from the docs > > Exactly one of the Hosts associated with each Engine MUST have a name > matching the defaultHost attribute of that Engine. That attribute for simple Tomcat installations is "localhost", which you already have. Nothing to do with contexts. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mod_jk error numbers
Hi all, I would like to ask the list if someone can give me a hint, what might have gone wrong with our mod_jk. I just installed the connector and switched logging to debug mode. When I open the log file I see the following: [Tue Feb 14 18:00:23 2006] [27276:50880] [debug] map_uri_to_worker::jk_uri_worker_map.c (449): Attempting to map URI '/proxycheck.php' from 4 maps [Tue Feb 14 18:00:23 2006] [27276:50880] [debug] map_uri_to_worker::jk_uri_worker_map.c (461): Attempting to map context URI '/servlets-examples/*' [Tue Feb 14 18:00:23 2006] [27276:50880] [debug] map_uri_to_worker::jk_uri_worker_map.c (461): Attempting to map context URI '/jsp-examples/*.jsp' [Tue Feb 14 18:00:23 2006] [27276:50880] [debug] map_uri_to_worker::jk_uri_worker_map.c (461): Attempting to map context URI '/esriadmin/*' [Tue Feb 14 18:00:23 2006] [27276:50880] [debug] map_uri_to_worker::jk_uri_worker_map.c (461): Attempting to map context URI '/servlet/*' [Tue Feb 14 18:00:23 2006] [27275:50880] [debug] map_uri_to_worker::jk_uri_worker_map.c (449): Attempting to map URI '/cgi-bin/iframe/autovol' from 4 maps [Tue Feb 14 18:00:23 2006] [27275:50880] [debug] map_uri_to_worker::jk_uri_worker_map.c (461): Attempting to map context URI '/servlets-examples/*' [Tue Feb 14 18:00:23 2006] [27275:50880] [debug] map_uri_to_worker::jk_uri_worker_map.c (461): Attempting to map context URI '/jsp-examples/*.jsp' [Tue Feb 14 18:00:23 2006] [27275:50880] [debug] map_uri_to_worker::jk_uri_worker_map.c (461): Attempting to map context URI '/esriadmin/*' [Tue Feb 14 18:00:23 2006] [27275:50880] [debug] map_uri_to_worker::jk_uri_worker_map.c (461): Attempting to map context URI '/servlet/*' [Tue Feb 14 18:00:35 2006] [27272:50880] [debug] map_uri_to_worker::jk_uri_worker_map.c (449): Attempting to map URI '/ip.cgi' from 4 maps over and over. What bothers me is the existence of the '/proxycheck.php' , '/cgi-bin/iframe/autovol' and '/ip.cgi' entries, since these are the same requests at our apache firewall in mod_secure. These should have been blocked, but seem to get through to the connector. So my questions are: 1. What does the 449 and 461 numbers mean? 2. Is there a security hole in our server? Thanks for any reply and best regards Jan Peters-Anders
RE: default webapp not understanding
5.5x on xp. -Original Message- From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 10:46 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: default webapp not understanding > From: Scott Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: default webapp not understanding > > I am having trouble understanding what is meant by the default webapp. (It would help if you'd tell us what Tomcat level you're running...) For 5.5.x, the default webapp is the one located in webapps/ROOT.war or the webapps/ROOT directory. > Can I somehow configure this to go to the above > $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/mywebapp/index.html? Deploy your webapp in webapps/ROOT, not webapps/mywebapp. > I get confused when the doc states that the entry in the host > must also have a context entry? Can anyone clarify that. Where does it say that? The current doc states that you _can_ nest tags inside , not that you must. Putting tags in server.xml is strongly discouraged these days, but not all of the doc has caught up to that fact. > Here from the docs > > Exactly one of the Hosts associated with each Engine MUST have a name > matching the defaultHost attribute of that Engine. That attribute for simple Tomcat installations is "localhost", which you already have. Nothing to do with contexts. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: default webapp not understanding
Sorry, I didn't catch the other one. Tomcat 5.5x on xp If I deploy the webapp in ROOT, then the structure would look like this: $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/root/mywebapp. And the index.html would still live in root .. isn't that correct. So I would still need a way to go from the root/index.html to the mywebapp/index.html correct? This is where it gets confusing. Thanks, -Original Message- From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 10:46 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: default webapp not understanding > From: Scott Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: default webapp not understanding > > I am having trouble understanding what is meant by the default webapp. (It would help if you'd tell us what Tomcat level you're running...) For 5.5.x, the default webapp is the one located in webapps/ROOT.war or the webapps/ROOT directory. > Can I somehow configure this to go to the above > $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/mywebapp/index.html? Deploy your webapp in webapps/ROOT, not webapps/mywebapp. > I get confused when the doc states that the entry in the host > must also have a context entry? Can anyone clarify that. Where does it say that? The current doc states that you _can_ nest tags inside , not that you must. Putting tags in server.xml is strongly discouraged these days, but not all of the doc has caught up to that fact. > Here from the docs > > Exactly one of the Hosts associated with each Engine MUST have a name > matching the defaultHost attribute of that Engine. That attribute for simple Tomcat installations is "localhost", which you already have. Nothing to do with contexts. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maintaing sessions
Hello guys. I dont know if this is the right list for this question, but i dont have anywhere else to rely on so... the problem im facing is kinda tricky: theres this one computer that cant maintain sessions when i redirect it or click on a link... in fact, my guess is that this one client is not able to maintain any session at all... im guessing this client is buged, but it can acess virtually any web site without problems, so i cant really be sure... any toughs? im using tomcat5.5 and i tried with ie and firefox and the results are the same -- []'s Marcelo Takeshi Fukushima - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: default webapp not understanding
Hi, no, you must delete whole the original contents of the existing directory webapps/ROOT and deploy your own ROOT.war web application. Be careful. The `ROOT' word is case sensitive. The default URL mapping is: http://[machine]:[port]/[context]/[servlet]/ where machine is currently localhost, port is 8080 by default context is in the context.xml file and usualy is the same as the web application name servlet: it's defined in web.xml servlet-mapping tag If you deploy your application as ROOT application, the context path will be only `/' (slash). Chuck explains it to me (thank you Chuck!) one month before. Look into the mailing-list history. Hope to help you Have a nice day! PETR On 2/14/06, Scott Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, I didn't catch the other one. > > Tomcat 5.5x on xp > > If I deploy the webapp in ROOT, then the structure would look like this: > $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/root/mywebapp. > And the index.html would still live in root .. isn't that correct. So I > would still need a way to go from the root/index.html to the > mywebapp/index.html correct? > > This is where it gets confusing. > > > > Thanks, > > -Original Message- > From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 10:46 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: default webapp not understanding > > > From: Scott Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: default webapp not understanding > > > > I am having trouble understanding what is meant by the default webapp. > > (It would help if you'd tell us what Tomcat level you're running...) > > For 5.5.x, the default webapp is the one located in webapps/ROOT.war or > the webapps/ROOT directory. > > > Can I somehow configure this to go to the above > > $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/mywebapp/index.html? > > Deploy your webapp in webapps/ROOT, not webapps/mywebapp. > > > I get confused when the doc states that the entry in the host > > must also have a context entry? Can anyone clarify that. > > Where does it say that? The current doc states that you _can_ nest > tags inside , not that you must. Putting tags > in server.xml is strongly discouraged these days, but not all of the doc > has caught up to that fact. > > > Here from the docs > > > > Exactly one of the Hosts associated with each Engine MUST have a name > > matching the defaultHost attribute of that Engine. > > That attribute for simple Tomcat installations is "localhost", which you > already have. Nothing to do with contexts. > > - Chuck > > > THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY > MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you > received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail > and its attachments from all computers. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
RE: Problem with tomcat
Well, the jsp page is clearely not being processed by a jsp engine. Several things could cause this. Perhaps there's no JSP engine mapped to process requests ending in .jsp, perhaps you mislabelled your .jsp file extensions, perhaps you're serving the .jps files out of a web server ( apache? ) that isn't configured to pass these requests on to the servlet container ( tomcat ). You probably need to give some more information, or perhaps do some more fundamentals type reading. --- On Tue 02/14, Kasim < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: From: Kasim [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@tomcat.apache.org Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:59:47 +0530 Subject: Problem with tomcat when ever i am calling the jsp page Instead of it its code is been openingin notepad.So can any body tell me the solution-To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: default webapp not understanding
> From: Scott Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: default webapp not understanding > > If I deploy the webapp in ROOT, then the structure would look > like this: > $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/root/mywebapp. No - get rid of the mywebapp idea. Your app needs to be deployed AS root, not under it. Your app replaces the existing contents of webapps/ROOT. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: default webapp not understanding
This has been my confusion ... when I put the war file there, it creates the mywebapp folder structure. Should I of named the webapp root? OK, lets say I take the contents from the war file and place all loose in root ... that should work then, and my problem would be resolved. But if I want another app, lets say devmywebapp, how does that work. As I cannot put two folderless apps together under root. Sorry, possibly I am making things more confusing than they are. -Original Message- From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:02 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: default webapp not understanding > From: Scott Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: default webapp not understanding > > If I deploy the webapp in ROOT, then the structure would look > like this: > $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/root/mywebapp. No - get rid of the mywebapp idea. Your app needs to be deployed AS root, not under it. Your app replaces the existing contents of webapps/ROOT. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: default webapp not understanding
> From: Scott Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: default webapp not understanding > > This has been my confusion ... when I put the war file there, > it creates the mywebapp folder structure. Should I of named > the webapp root? The "name" of the webapp (what's used on the URI) is determined by its location, not anything else (unless you put a tag in server.xml, but you're not supposed to do that). Tomcat special cases the location ROOT, so whatever is stored in there becomes the default application. > OK, lets say I take the contents from the war file and place all loose > in root ... that should work then, and my problem would be > resolved. Easier just to name the file ROOT.war, put it in webapps, and delete the webapps/ROOT directory. > But if I want another app, lets say devmywebapp, how does that work. As I > cannot put two folderless apps together under root. Each directory or .war file immediately under webapps is a webapp (at the risk of being redundant). This is intended to be a single-level layout - webapps aren't supposed to be nested (although they sometimes seem to work that way). Only one app can be the default (by definition), and that's the one in ROOT (or ROOT.war); put your other app under webapps/devmywebapp or whatever name you want to use. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Trouble accessing Resources in my Context
Thanks Chuck for pointing that out. Given that everything else goes in WEB-INF, when I was reading the page I misread it every time. Is there any particular reason the context file goes in META-INF as opposed to WEB-INF? Mark On Feb 14, 2006, at 6:16 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Mark Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Trouble accessing Resources in my Context So, while this works acceptably (the context information for the webapp is not included in server.xml), I would *much* prefer to use the WEB-INF/context.xml the Tomcat docs say I can (the fourth bullet on this page - http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/ context.html). If someone could explain why that doesn't work, I'd be really appreciative. Is this possibly a known issue? Read what the bullet actually says, not what you think it says: if the previous file was not found for this application, in individual file at /META-INF/context.xml inside the application files What directory does it really specify? (Hint: it's not WEB-INF.) - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e- mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Setting up a parallel test environment on the same machine as main server
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 12:36, Tim Lucia wrote: > 1. Moving the JkMount directive inside a will make it > accesible from only that virtual host. So, you must repeat common ones, > such as /jkmanager. I put the mappings (JkMount(s)) right in the virtual > host definition(s) with no trouble at all. Thanks - just what I needed confirmation on > > 2. The virtual host is determined by the http host header, not by the > connector host name. This is true for both httpd and tomcat (and any other > web server.) Not sure I understand what you are mean here by "http host header", isn't that the name of the web site that I am accessing (ie as known by apache) rather than as known by a backend topcat At the moment, I have apache, with two virtual host names of home.chandlerfamily.org.uk (also known as www.chandlerfamily.org.uk) (ip address of my WAN) money.home (ip address of 192.168.0.32) based on ip addressing only (ie not named virtual hosts - because it also needs to support https where named virtual hosts are not supported) which all end up using tomcat services for parts of the web site (urls as defined in JkMountFile). It is all directed to a single tomcat host via a single worker.properties file with the following worker.list=tomcat worker.tomcat.type=ajp13 worker.tomcat.host=appserv.home worker.tomcat.port=8009 worker.tomcat.connect_timeout=10 and a single host on the server.xml line defined as appserv.home This appserv.home (ip address 192.168.0.31) is certainly currently getting all the traffic it should get from apache - but I don't see how that is related to the http host in the header. BUT ... Do you mean that if I had changed my workers thusly worker.list=production,test worker.production.host=prodserv.home worker.test.host=testserv.home ... for the other parameters but where both prodserv.home, and testserv.home had the SAME ip address (say 127.0.0.1 :-) ) AND i add an apache virtual host of test.home (ip address 192.168.0.39) That I can differenciate them in the server.xml file by having an engine running of localhost, but with two hosts with names of prodserv.home and testserv.home respectively, and that provided the JkMountFile was then moved into the correct apache virtual host context, then the same url could be mapped by one apache virtual host to worker production and the other apache virtual host could map to worker test. I could then have different versions of the same app running on production and test. > > You can always install Apache httpd + Tomcat on a second machine (or on the > same machine on a separate set of ports), if you are reluctant to try it on > you production host. > > HTH, > Tim > > > -Original Message- > From: Alan Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 3:50 AM > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Re: Setting up a parallel test environment on the same machine as > main server > > > On Sunday 12 February 2006 17:07, Alan Chandler wrote: > ... > > > Unless anyone here can suggest a better way, I would like to move the > > JkMountFile directive from global scope to virtual host scope and have > > two separate files urimap files so that I can map different things > > dependent on which virtual host. > > > > However, since this is a live site I don't want to just conduct the > > simple experiment to see if will work, so I am asking here if this is > > OK. > > Is there really nobody on this list who can answer this simple question? > > ... > > > However, I don't fully understand the relationship between , > > and stanza's in the server.xml file, and until I do, I > > am reluctant to muck about with it and potentially screw the currently > > working arrangement. > > Specifically, there was some conversation here about it best that if tomcat > was running on the same box as the web server (which it is in my case) that > it would be best to make the connection between apache2 and tomcat be via > localhost. That being the case, how can I map the SAME servlet name but > from > a different virtual host (albeit ip based) on apache to DIFFERENT hosts on > the same tomcat engine. -- Alan Chandler http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk Open Source. It's the difference between trust and antitrust. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Setting up a parallel test environment on the same machine as main server
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 12:36, Tim Lucia wrote: > > > You can always install Apache httpd + Tomcat on a second machine (or on the > same machine on a separate set of ports), if you are reluctant to try it on > you production host. Of course in an ideal world I would - but this is my home, and I don't have any more spare machines. I am already testing on an independant machine first, but I want to essentially bring a new version gently into play - running off of a single database on my main server - just to prove that I can bring the application up in as close to production environment as possible in a test environment before switching it to live. -- Alan Chandler http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk Open Source. It's the difference between trust and antitrust. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trouble accessing Resources in my Context
> From: Mark Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Trouble accessing Resources in my Context > > Is there any particular reason the context file goes in META-INF as > opposed to WEB-INF? As I understand it, the structure and contents of WEB-INF are defined by the servlet spec, and adding container-specific files to that directory is frowned upon. META-INF is somewhat of a catch-all location. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't get caseSensitive="false" to work
I read the thread from last week about case-sensitivity, and did some additional googling when it didn't work, but still can't get my Tomcat 5.5.12 on Win2k, running with Java 1.5.0_06 to be case-INsensitive for the context path. That is a problem for my users, because we migrated them from SilverStream, which is NOT case-sensitive in the context path. I have tried the following Context entries. Note the entry in both the field, and the entry (I found that one via google). I have tried these entries eash separately, and together, and still cannot get my context path to be case-INsensitive. I don't care if things are case sensitive once they get into the app, but would really like to get the context path to not matter. This is in my server.xml, because I can't get the context path to work in context.xml: docBase="e:\TomcatClients\WebSiraCommon\webapps\SiteData" debug="0" reloadable="true" autoDeploy="true" unpackWARs="true" crossContext="false" caseSensitive="false"> And yes, I know about the security warning about being non case-sensitive on Windows! I also know that this context path setup is not the usual way of doing things; it's because I need to keep the path the same after the migration to Tomcat. Thanks! Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New isapi_redirect.dll has problems
Hi; I checked the registry - it's using the workers.properties.minimal I believe (but I would be happier if it logged the files it uses). The problem with the urls it should not touch only showed up with the new version from Mark - that never happened before. As to the thread count, if someone tells me how to raise this, I will do so. But we get very low volume on this so I would be surprised if that is it. Any other ideas anyone? Thanks - dave David Thielen www.windwardreports.com 303-499-2544 -Original Message- From: Ian Buzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:21 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: New isapi_redirect.dll has problems OK, first I'll point out that I'm pretty new to Tomcat myself > workers.properties.minimal: Is jk even using this config file? Normally it would use workers.properties unless it was configured otherwise. > [Mon Feb 13 07:56:49 2006] [info] jk_ajp_common.c (1248): > Error connecting > to the Tomcat process. These errors suggest that jk is sending threads to tomcat, but tomcat does not have enough threads to provide a response. You might want to try adjusting the backlog, maxThreads and all the other "threads" properties for your connector in /conf/server.xml I've noticed that if jk cannot receive any more threads from the web server (worker.ajp13w.cachesize too small) or tomcat cannot respond to all the threads that are sent to it (maxThreads too small), it just doesn't seem to respond correctly, leading either to a host not available error in IE or a blank page in Firefox. I personally feel that it would be better if jk could respond with some kind of 500 error. > [Mon Feb 13 17:03:09 2006] [warn] jk_uri_worker_map.c (429): Uri > http://www.windwardreports.com/root.htm?source=google&id=540 > is invalid. Uri > must start with / This is a bit weird. Is your web server doing any URL rewriting? You haven't got any links in your application that might end up looking like this: http://www.somehost.com/http://www.windwardreports.com/root.htm?... or even this: /http://www.windwardreports.com/root.htm?... Ian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat 5.5.15 Context Reloading issue
I've done some further searching, and noticed that tomcat was also dumping information into stdout. There is another log trace that might be helpful if anyone else recognizes the problem. I'm of the belief that this is a bug of some sort, but I don't know who to pass the information along to. Also, I tried adding information into the context docbase, and it had no effect on the problem. I also removed all log4j files that I had added to the configuration. Again, this wasn't happening with tomcat 5.5.12, but started after I began to use 5.5.15. Thanks. log4j:ERROR Error occured while converting date. java.lang.NullPointerException at java.lang.System.arraycopy(Native Method) at java.lang.AbstractStringBuilder.getChars(AbstractStringBuilder.java:331) at java.lang.StringBuffer.getChars(StringBuffer.java:202) at org.apache.log4j.helpers.AbsoluteTimeDateFormat.format(AbsoluteTimeDateForma t.java:117) at java.text.DateFormat.format(DateFormat.java:314) at org.apache.log4j.helpers.PatternParser$DatePatternConverter.convert(PatternP arser.java:444) at org.apache.log4j.helpers.PatternConverter.format(PatternConverter.java:64) at org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout.format(PatternLayout.java:503) at org.apache.log4j.WriterAppender.subAppend(WriterAppender.java:301) at org.apache.log4j.WriterAppender.append(WriterAppender.java:159) at org.apache.log4j.AppenderSkeleton.doAppend(AppenderSkeleton.java:230) at org.apache.log4j.helpers.AppenderAttachableImpl.appendLoopOnAppenders(Append erAttachableImpl.java:65) at org.apache.log4j.Category.callAppenders(Category.java:203) at org.apache.log4j.Category.forcedLog(Category.java:388) at org.apache.log4j.Category.log(Category.java:853) at org.apache.commons.logging.impl.Log4JLogger.info(Log4JLogger.java:133) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationContext.log(ApplicationContext.java:638) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationContextFacade.log(ApplicationContextFaca de.java:249) at org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoader.initWebApplicationContext(Cont extLoader.java:176) at org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderServlet.init(ContextLoaderServl et.java:83) at javax.servlet.GenericServlet.init(GenericServlet.java:211) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.loadServlet(StandardWrapper.java:11 05) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.load(StandardWrapper.java:932) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.loadOnStartup(StandardContext.java: 3915) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(StandardContext.java:4176) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.reload(StandardContext.java:2988) at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappLoader.backgroundProcess(WebappLoader.java: 403) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.backgroundProcess(ContainerBase.java: 1276) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor.processC hildren(ContainerBase.java:1568) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor.processC hildren(ContainerBase.java:1577) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor.processC hildren(ContainerBase.java:1577) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor.run(Cont ainerBase.java:1557) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
Re: Maintaing sessions
ok i guess ive found the source of the problem: this guys firewall is set to block "foreign cookies" and when that rule is disabled, it runs normally... can anyone help me please? On 2/14/06, Marcelo Fukushima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello guys. > > I dont know if this is the right list for this question, but i dont > have anywhere else to rely on so... > the problem im facing is kinda tricky: theres this one computer that > cant maintain sessions when i redirect it or click on a link... in > fact, my guess is that this one client is not able to maintain any > session at all... im guessing this client is buged, but it can acess > virtually any web site without problems, so i cant really be sure... > any toughs? > > im using tomcat5.5 and i tried with ie and firefox and the results are > the same > > -- > []'s > Marcelo Takeshi Fukushima > -- []'s Marcelo Takeshi Fukushima - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Tomcat 5.5 documentation: how to update website?
> > From: Steve Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/02/14 Tue AM 06:27:52 EST > To: "Tomcat Users List" > Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5 documentation: how to update website? > > > On 14 Feb 2006, at 11:05, Warren Pace wrote: > > > > >> > >> From: Steve Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Date: 2006/02/14 Tue AM 03:50:19 EST > >> To: users@tomcat.apache.org > >> Subject: Tomcat 5.5 documentation: how to update website? > >> > >> Hi all > >> > >> Just spent time getting the Tomcat5.sh script to work as a daemon > >> under linux following the advice on the url:- > >> > >> > >> "The Apache Tomcat 5.5 Servlet/JSP Container" > >> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/setup.html > >> > >> > >> "The file $CATALINA_HOME/bin/jsvc/native/tomcat.sh can be used as a > >> template for starting Tomcat automatically at boot time from /etc/ > >> init.d. The file is currently setup for running Tomcat 4.1.x, so it > >> is necessary to edit it and change the classname from > >> BootstrapService to Bootstrap." > >> > >> > >> If only I'd known catalina.sh works 'out of the box' :-) > > > > Section 1 of the docs - under the "Directories and Files" heading, > > second paragraph - > > "These are some of the key tomcat directories all relative to > > $CATALINA_HOME > > ./bin - Startup, shutdown, and other scripts. The *.sh files (for > > Unix systems) are functional duplicates of the *.bat files (for > > Windows systems). Since the Win32 command-line lacks certain > > functionality, there are some additional files in here." > > HOWEVER - you're better off for having used jsvc. > > "Out of the box" scrips run tc as root user. > Thanks Warren :-) > I guess I was overwhelmed with the sheer number of config files/ > directories involved :) (startup.sh, catalina.sh, tomcat.sh?) > All sorted now though. Oh. You should have seen me trying to figure this thing out when I first got started . . . > > > > >> > >> How can I update this page to help let people know there's an easier > >> option to get Tomcat using a startup script with catalina.sh rather > >> than tomcat5.sh? > >> > >> > >> Many thanks > >> > >> Steve > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about deployment of web app
My 2 cents is on you have may have missed something in recreating your environment. Hence, I would test it with some very simple code just to ensure classpath dependencies are fine. Only after that check, if it doesn't resolve the problem, I would face the app code. On 2/14/06, Lian Liming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, all > > I am using Tomcat 5.5.15 on Window 2000 server. My web app worked well > before reinstallation of Window2000. After reinstallation, I set up the same > java environment with the same tomcat version. But a problem comes in the > deployment of my former well-working app. > > In the tomcat log, I got the following message: > 2006-2-14 15:57:47 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig > deployDescriptor > Error deploying configuration descriptor myApp.xml > java.lang.NullPointerException > at > org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptor(HostConfig.java:576) > at > org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployApps(HostConfig.java:493) > at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.check > (HostConfig.java:1195) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native > Method) > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke > (DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) > at > org.apache.commons.modeler.BaseModelMBean.invoke(BaseModelMBean.java:503) > at com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.DynamicMetaDataImpl.invoke > (DynamicMetaDataImpl.java:213) > at > com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.MetaDataImpl.invoke(MetaDataImpl.java:220) > at > com.sun.jmx.interceptor.DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.invoke(DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.java:815) > at > com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.JmxMBeanServer.invoke(JmxMBeanServer.java:784) > at > org.apache.catalina.manager.ManagerServlet.check(ManagerServlet.java:1377) > at org.apache.catalina.manager.ManagerServlet.deploy > (ManagerServlet.java:814) > at > org.apache.catalina.manager.HTMLManagerServlet.deployInternal(HTMLManagerServlet.java:248) > at > org.apache.catalina.manager.HTMLManagerServlet.doGet(HTMLManagerServlet.java:95) > at > javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:689) > at > javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802) > at > org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java > :252) > at > org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:173) > at > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:213) > at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke > (StandardContextValve.java:178) > at > org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:524) > at > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:126) > at > org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:105) > at > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:107) > at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service > (CoyoteAdapter.java:148) > at > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:869) > at > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java > :667) > at > org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527) > at > org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80) > at > org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run > (ThreadPool.java:684) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) > 2006-2-14 15:57:47 > org.apache.catalina.startup.ContextConfig > applicationWebConfig > Message: Missing application web.xml, using defaults only > StandardEngine[Catalina].StandardHost[localhost].StandardContext[/myApp] > > It is really strange since I didn't change any codes in my web app including > web.xml under WEB-INF. It worked well before the reinstallation, but fail to > deploy after the reinstallation. What is the possible wrong? > > My web.xml is attached. Thanks for any suggestions. > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No of concurrent requests per session
So? As someone else pointed out. That's what the standard recommends. You really didn't even bother to find the registry key that I mentioned did you? George Sexton MH Software, Inc. http://www.mhsoftware.com/ Voice: 303 438 9585 > -Original Message- > From: Abhilash Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 9:45 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: No of concurrent requests per session > > Hello: > > Thanking everyone for words of wisdom .. > > I checked with firefox 1.0.7 also. It is also showing the > same behaviour as > with IE. > > thanks and regards, > > -- Kannan. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 9:58 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: No of concurrent requests per session > > > I suspect the problem relates to pipelining of HTTP 1.1 > requests over a > single persistent TCP connection. Pipelining is intended to improve > efficiency, allowing the need for multiple images to present > a web page be > expressed to a web server one after another, before any of > the responses > are given. However, the responses must be presented in the > same order as > the requests, and therein lies your problem. If your short running > request is issued over the same TCP connection as one of the > earlier, yet > to be responded to, long running requests, the response to the later > request must wait for the earlier request to be responded to > first. In > this scenario, you need to get either the browser or the web server to > stop using persistent connections. Of course, this may make it less > efficient for serving up "normal" web pages. > > > > Please respond to "Tomcat Users List" > > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" > cc: > Subject:RE: No of concurrent requests per session > > > > I'm guessing this is more of a browser issue. If you're using > IE, I seem > to > recall there is a registry entry that lets you set the > maximum concurrent > requests. > > George Sexton > MH Software, Inc. > http://www.mhsoftware.com/ > Voice: 303 438 9585 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Abhilash Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 6:43 AM > > To: Tomcat Users List > > Subject: No of concurrent requests per session > > > > Hello: > > > > I am using Tomcat 5.0.30 with HTTP 1.1 Connector. If I try > > to make a third request while two other request's (which i > > have already made) responses have not yet arrived, then > > Tomcat is not serving the request until one of the pending > > response arrives. This limits me to only two pending requests > > (irrespective of the webapp) at a time. > > > > My front app is like a dashboard which integarates > multiple > web apps of > which some are reporting apps which requires 4 to > > 7 minutes to process a request and some are data processing > > apps which requires only seconds to process the request. > > Assume the user clicks on two reporting links which open up > > as new windows from the main app window. Now when he clicks > > on another link irrespctive of the webapp, nothing happens > > until one of the reporting request's response is arrived. > > This problem appears only if the requests belong to the > same session. > > > > Any pointers / advices will be greatly appreciated. > > > > thanks and regards, > > > > -- Kannan. > > > > > > > > -- > > Amritha Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, India > >Sent using "PostMaster" by QuantumLink Communications > > One Internet account, unlimited personal e-mail addresses > > Get your free copy of "PostMaster" at http://www.mailserve.net/ > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > Amritha Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, India >Sent using "PostMaster" by QuantumLink Communications > One Internet account, unlimited personal e-mail addresses > Get your free copy of "PostMaster" at http://www.mailserve.net/ > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No of concurrent requests per session
I suppose turning off HTTP 1.1 would probably do it. George Sexton MH Software, Inc. http://www.mhsoftware.com/ Voice: 303 438 9585 > -Original Message- > From: Abhilash Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 11:23 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: No of concurrent requests per session > > Hello: > > Hello: > > Can u tell how to prevent browser or webserver using > persistent connection ? > > thanks and regards, > > -- Kannan. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 9:58 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: No of concurrent requests per session > > > I suspect the problem relates to pipelining of HTTP 1.1 > requests over a > single persistent TCP connection. Pipelining is intended to improve > efficiency, allowing the need for multiple images to present > a web page be > expressed to a web server one after another, before any of > the responses > are given. However, the responses must be presented in the > same order as > the requests, and therein lies your problem. If your short running > request is issued over the same TCP connection as one of the > earlier, yet > to be responded to, long running requests, the response to the later > request must wait for the earlier request to be responded to > first. In > this scenario, you need to get either the browser or the web server to > stop using persistent connections. Of course, this may make it less > efficient for serving up "normal" web pages. > > > > Please respond to "Tomcat Users List" > > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" > cc: > Subject:RE: No of concurrent requests per session > > > > I'm guessing this is more of a browser issue. If you're using > IE, I seem > to > recall there is a registry entry that lets you set the > maximum concurrent > requests. > > George Sexton > MH Software, Inc. > http://www.mhsoftware.com/ > Voice: 303 438 9585 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Abhilash Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 6:43 AM > > To: Tomcat Users List > > Subject: No of concurrent requests per session > > > > Hello: > > > > I am using Tomcat 5.0.30 with HTTP 1.1 Connector. If I try > > to make a third request while two other request's (which i > > have already made) responses have not yet arrived, then > > Tomcat is not serving the request until one of the pending > > response arrives. This limits me to only two pending requests > > (irrespective of the webapp) at a time. > > > > My front app is like a dashboard which integarates > multiple > web apps of > which some are reporting apps which requires 4 to > > 7 minutes to process a request and some are data processing > > apps which requires only seconds to process the request. > > Assume the user clicks on two reporting links which open up > > as new windows from the main app window. Now when he clicks > > on another link irrespctive of the webapp, nothing happens > > until one of the reporting request's response is arrived. > > This problem appears only if the requests belong to the > same session. > > > > Any pointers / advices will be greatly appreciated. > > > > thanks and regards, > > > > -- Kannan. > > > > > > > > -- > > Amritha Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, India > >Sent using "PostMaster" by QuantumLink Communications > > One Internet account, unlimited personal e-mail addresses > > Get your free copy of "PostMaster" at http://www.mailserve.net/ > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > Amritha Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, India >Sent using "PostMaster" by QuantumLink Communications > One Internet account, unlimited personal e-mail addresses > Get your free copy of "PostMaster" at http://www.mailserve.net/ > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Setting up a parallel test environment on the same machine as main server
Well, you can run Apache on any number of ports you wish, so if you are limited by machines, then that is a way out. Personally, I run IIS+2 tomcats clustered and Apache httpd + 2 tomcats clustered all on one dev machine, just keep the ports straight. That way, I can compare configurations on the same hardware, same OS, etc. Tim -Original Message- From: Alan Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 3:14 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Setting up a parallel test environment on the same machine as main server On Tuesday 14 February 2006 12:36, Tim Lucia wrote: > > > You can always install Apache httpd + Tomcat on a second machine (or > on the same machine on a separate set of ports), if you are reluctant > to try it on you production host. Of course in an ideal world I would - but this is my home, and I don't have any more spare machines. I am already testing on an independant machine first, but I want to essentially bring a new version gently into play - running off of a single database on my main server - just to prove that I can bring the application up in as close to production environment as possible in a test environment before switching it to live. -- Alan Chandler http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk Open Source. It's the difference between trust and antitrust. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Setting up a parallel test environment on the same machine as main server
The http host header is sent by the user-agent ("browser") based on the
address requested in the URL. This is how virtual hosts are differentiated.
Tomcat supports a container for virtual host differentiation, just
like Apache does. You do not need to change the workers at all. Tomcat
sees the same host header that Apache does. I.e., using Tamper Data and
FireFox, I see
Host=www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
When I request your web site. (Along with a photo of you, presumably, in a
tie & sunglasses ;-) You might also want to send just "Apache" for the
server, rather then
Server=Apache/2.0.54 (Debian GNU/Linux) mod_auth_pgsql/2.0.2b1 DAV/2
SVN/1.1.4 mod_jk/1.2.14 mod_python/3.1.3 Python/2.3.5 PHP/4.3.10-16
mod_ssl/2.0.54 OpenSSL/0.9.7e mod-xslt/1.0.0rc1
As it is "more secure". How to do this was recently discussed on this list.
So, you should have two virtual hosts (by name) in both server.xml and
httpd.conf. Not sure how to solve the https problem -- never tried to
myself.
Hope this is helpful,
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Alan Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 3:09 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Setting up a parallel test environment on the same machine as
main server
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 12:36, Tim Lucia wrote:
> 1. Moving the JkMount directive inside a will make it
> accesible from only that virtual host. So, you must repeat common
> ones, such as /jkmanager. I put the mappings (JkMount(s)) right in
> the virtual host definition(s) with no trouble at all.
Thanks - just what I needed confirmation on
>
> 2. The virtual host is determined by the http host header, not by the
> connector host name. This is true for both httpd and tomcat (and any
> other web server.)
Not sure I understand what you are mean here by "http host header", isn't
that
the name of the web site that I am accessing (ie as known by apache) rather
than as known by a backend topcat
At the moment, I have apache, with two virtual host names of
home.chandlerfamily.org.uk (also known as www.chandlerfamily.org.uk) (ip
address of my WAN)
money.home (ip address of 192.168.0.32)
based on ip addressing only (ie not named virtual hosts - because it also
needs to support https where named virtual hosts are not supported)
which all end up using tomcat services for parts of the web site (urls as
defined in JkMountFile). It is all directed to a single tomcat host via a
single worker.properties file with the following
worker.list=tomcat
worker.tomcat.type=ajp13
worker.tomcat.host=appserv.home
worker.tomcat.port=8009
worker.tomcat.connect_timeout=10
and a single host on the server.xml line defined as
appserv.home
This appserv.home (ip address 192.168.0.31) is certainly currently getting
all
the traffic it should get from apache - but I don't see how that is related
to the http host in the header.
BUT ...
Do you mean that if I had changed my workers thusly
worker.list=production,test
worker.production.host=prodserv.home
worker.test.host=testserv.home
... for the other parameters
but where both prodserv.home, and testserv.home had the SAME ip address (say
127.0.0.1 :-) )
AND i add an apache virtual host of test.home (ip address 192.168.0.39)
That I can differenciate them in the server.xml file by having an engine
running of localhost, but with two hosts with names of prodserv.home and
testserv.home respectively, and that provided the JkMountFile was then moved
into the correct apache virtual host context, then the same url could be
mapped by one apache virtual host to worker production and the other apache
virtual host could map to worker test.
I could then have different versions of the same app running on production
and
test.
>
> You can always install Apache httpd + Tomcat on a second machine (or
> on the same machine on a separate set of ports), if you are reluctant
> to try it on you production host.
>
> HTH,
> Tim
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 3:50 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Setting up a parallel test environment on the same
> machine as main server
>
>
> On Sunday 12 February 2006 17:07, Alan Chandler wrote:
> ...
>
> > Unless anyone here can suggest a better way, I would like to move
> > the JkMountFile directive from global scope to virtual host scope
> > and have two separate files urimap files so that I can map different
> > things dependent on which virtual host.
> >
> > However, since this is a live site I don't want to just conduct the
> > simple experiment to see if will work, so I am asking here if this
> > is OK.
>
> Is there really nobody on this list who can answer this simple
> question?
>
> ...
>
> > However, I don't fully understand the relationship between
> > , and stanza's in the server.xml file, and
> > until I do, I am reluctant to muck about with it and potentially
> > screw the current
Tomcat 5.5.15 Clustering ?
Hi,
I' ve try to use Tomcat 5.5.15 in cluster mod. And after some work on
configuration and test
i seems to be on limit of my all possibilities ;)
I try to use two tomcat in cluster with apache web server and mod_jk as
connector.
my Apache configuration look like :
# workers.properties
ps=/
# List the workers name
worker.list=loadbalancer
#
# First worker
#
worker.node01.port=8009
worker.node01.host=agnes
worker.node01.type=ajp13
worker.node01.lbfactor=1
#worker.node01.domain=cluster1
#
# Second worker
#
worker.node02.port=9009
worker.node02.host=ovea-inspiron
worker.node02.type=ajp13
worker.node02.lbfactor=1
#worker.node02.domain=cluster1
# --
# Load Balancer worker
# --
worker.loadbalancer.type=lb
worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=false
worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers=node01,node02
As you can see i use two server ('agnes' IP : 192.168.2.102 and
'ovea-inspiron' IP : 192.168.2.103)
I' ve coded a little aplication who read un file and create a sessions if
session not exist.
If i use the system in mod load balancing (with no cluster mod activate)
all is great (my config is of course worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=true
)
So system run with session affinitu but the two server are accessible ;)
Now i try to configure as cluster mode with session replication
(my config is now worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=3Dfalse)
I configure my to server.xml like that :
agnes (IP : 192.168.2.102)
ovea-inspiron (IP : 192.168.2.103)
I'm user linux so i've compiled my kernel with multicat kernel option
I add the rout like rooute add -host 224.0.0.1 dev eth0
N.B : why 224.0.0.1 => http://www.iana.org/assignments/multicast-addresses
So route is :
ALL-SYSTEMS.MCA * 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 eth0
192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00
eth0
loopback* 255.0.0.0U 0 0
0 lo
default . 0.0.0.0 UG0 0
0 eth0
now i start the two tomcat with the same application in webapp directories
with tcpdump i verify the multicasting btewen my server .. so :
19:39:17.809978 IP 192.168.2.102.45564 > all-systems.mcast.net.45564:UDP,
length 56
19:39:18.546034 IP ovea-inspiron.45564 > all-systems.mcast.net.45564:UDP,
length 56
19:39:18.814418 IP 192.168.2.102.45564 > all-systems.mcast.net.45564UDP,
length 56
19:39:19.790470 IP ovea-inspiron.45564 > all-systems.mcast.net.45564:UDP,
length 56
19:39:19.818691 IP 192.168.2.102.45564 > all-systems.mcast.net.45564:UDP,
length 56
19:39:20.826650 IP 192.168.2.102.45564 > all-systems.mcast.net.45564:UDP,
length 56
19:39:20.943933 IP ovea-inspiron.45564 > all-systems.mcast.net.45564:UDP,
length 56
19:39:21.806813 arp who-has . tell 192.168.2.102
19:39:21.806972 arp reply . is-at 00:04:e2:b6:65:0a (oui Unknown)
19:39:21.831048 IP 192.168.2.102.45564 > all-systems.mcast.net.45564:UDP,
length 56
19:39:22.164812 IP ovea-inspiron.45564 > all-systems.mcast.net.45564:UDP,
length 56
19:39:22.835240 IP 192.168.2.102.45564 > all-systems.mcast.net.45564:UDP,
length 56
So all semms to be OK but i've
Feb 14, 2006 6:33:26 PM org.apache.catalina.cluster.tcp.SimpleTcpCluster st
art
INFO: Cluster is about to start
Feb 14, 2006 6:33:26 PM
org.apache.catalina.cluster.tcp.SimpleTcpClustercreateDefaultClusterValves
INFO: Add Default ClusterValves at cluster localhost
Feb 14, 2006 6:33:26 PM
org.apache.catalina.cluster.tcp.SimpleTcpClustercreateDefaultClusterListener
INFO: Add Default ClusterListener at cluster localhost
Feb 14, 2006 6:33:26 PM
org.apache.catalina.cluster.tcp.ReplicationTransmitter start
INFO: Start ClusterSender at cluster Catalina:type=3DCluster,host=3Dlocalhost
with name Catalina:type=3DClusterSender,host=3Dlocalhost
Feb 14, 2006 6:33:26 PM
org.apache.catalina.cluster.mcast.McastServiceImplsetupSocket
INFO: Setting multihome multicast interface to:/192.168.2.102
Feb 14, 2006 6:33:26 PM org.apache.catalina.cluster.mcast.McastService start
INFO: Sleeping for 4000 secs to establish cluster membership
Feb 14, 2006 6:33:30 PM
org.apache.catalina.cluster.mcast.McastServiceregisterMBean
INFO: membership mbean registered
(Catalina:type=3DClusterMembership,host=3Dlocalhost)
Feb 14, 2006 6:33:31 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployWAR
INFO: Deploying web application archive cluster-1.0-SNAPSHOT.war
Feb 14, 2006 6:33:31 PM org.apache.catalina.cluster.session.DeltaManager st
art
INFO: Register manager /cluster-1.0-SNAPSHOT to cluster element Host with
name localhost
Feb 14, 2006 6:33:31 PM org.apache.catalina.cluster.session.DeltaManager st
art
INFO: Starting clustering manager at /cluster-1.0-SNAPSHOT
Feb 14, 2006 6:33:31 PM
org.apac
Re: context error
hi, Mike, Do you mean put all directories together? No, we need to separate them. So, any other suggestions about this problem? Best Regards. jacky - Original Message - From: "Mike Sabroff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 10:56 PM Subject: Re: context error > Then do that > > jacky wrote: > > > > hi, > > When i add a Context in the server.xml, an error occurs: > > > > Apache Tomcat/4.1.31 > > Catalina.start: LifecycleException: Context startup failed due to > > previous errors > > LifecycleException: Context startup failed due to previous errors > > at > > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(StandardContext.java:3578) > > at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1141) > > at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.start(StandardHost.java:707) > > at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1141) > > at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine.start(StandardEngine.java:316) > > at > > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService.start(StandardService.java:450) > > at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.start(StandardServer.java:2143) > > at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(Catalina.java:463) > > at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.execute(Catalina.java:350) > > at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.process(Catalina.java:129) > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > > at > > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) > > at > > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) > > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) > > at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:156) > > Stopping service Tomcat-Standalone > > Catalina.stop: LifecycleException: Coyote connector has not been started > > LifecycleException: Coyote connector has not been started > > at > > org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector.stop(CoyoteConnector.java:1296) > > at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService.stop(StandardService.java:499) > > at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.stop(StandardServer.java:2178) > > at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(Catalina.java:494) > > at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.execute(Catalina.java:350) > > at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.process(Catalina.java:129) > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > > at > > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) > > at > > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) > > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) > > at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:156) > > > > If i remove the added context, tomcat will start. > > In fact, i rearrange the directories, i don't know if this will impact > > on the Context. If i put all directories under $CATALINA_HOME, tomcat > > will work well with the Context. > > > > $CATALINA_HOME/bin/ > > shared/ > > server/ > > > > $CATALINA_BASE/bin/ > > conf/ > > webapps/ > > logs/ > > work/ > > > > Context is as following: > > > > > > Best Regards. > > jacky > > > > -- > Mike Sabroff > Web Services > Developer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 920-568-8379 > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
security-constraint pattern: /* vs /
Hi all, I am trying to secure the index page of a web application but at the same time allow deeper path to be unprotected. For example: Protected Area / /other/protected/* But Tomcat 5.0 and 5.5 behave as I have written: Protected Area /* /other/protected/* ...they basically secure everything. I checked the source code, and indeed, the "/" pattern is treated as a special one and it is called the "universal mapper". I could not find anything in the spec about this "universal mapper" and also I could not find anything that explains this behaviour for "/". Any suggestions in this regard? Thanks, Marius - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No of concurrent requests per session
> > -Original Message- > > From: Abhilash Kumar > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 9:45 PM > > To: Tomcat Users List > > Subject: RE: No of concurrent requests per session > > > > Hello: > > > > Thanking everyone for words of wisdom .. > > > > I checked with firefox 1.0.7 also. It is also > showing the > > same behaviour as > > with IE. > > > > thanks and regards, > > > > -- Kannan. And did you download the Fasterfox extension to allow it more than "2" connections to any given web server? By default Firefox (without the Fasterfox settings or manipulating user.js) will only use 2 connections at any given time to a single web server. Wade - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: App will work on localhost but blank on client PC.
Server is 192.168.2.100, client is 192.168.2.X We tried using http://192.168.2.100:8447/ from the client, and the blank problem first cropped up. Now, instead of http://localhost:8447/ we tried http://192.168.2.100:8447/ from the server itself, and it also comes up blank. -Original Message- From: Mike Sabroff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 9:55 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: App will work on localhost but blank on client PC. >How does localhost resolve in that scenario...why not use the hostname >or ip address - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: App will work on localhost but blank on client PC.
maybe caused by firewall or something like that ... ? - Original Message - From: "Alexander Alekseev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 10:00 AM Subject: RE: App will work on localhost but blank on client PC. Server is 192.168.2.100, client is 192.168.2.X We tried using http://192.168.2.100:8447/ from the client, and the blank problem first cropped up. Now, instead of http://localhost:8447/ we tried http://192.168.2.100:8447/ from the server itself, and it also comes up blank. -Original Message- From: Mike Sabroff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 9:55 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: App will work on localhost but blank on client PC. How does localhost resolve in that scenario...why not use the hostname or ip address - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No of concurrent requests per session
Hello: No, I haven't tried the Fasterfox extension. Let me try it and see the results. thanks and regards, -- Kannan. -Original Message- From: Wade Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 8:13 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: No of concurrent requests per session > > -Original Message- > > From: Abhilash Kumar > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 9:45 PM > > To: Tomcat Users List > > Subject: RE: No of concurrent requests per session > > > > Hello: > > > > Thanking everyone for words of wisdom .. > > > > I checked with firefox 1.0.7 also. It is also > showing the > > same behaviour as > > with IE. > > > > thanks and regards, > > > > -- Kannan. And did you download the Fasterfox extension to allow it more than "2" connections to any given web server? By default Firefox (without the Fasterfox settings or manipulating user.js) will only use 2 connections at any given time to a single web server. Wade - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Amritha Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, India Sent using "PostMaster" by QuantumLink Communications One Internet account, unlimited personal e-mail addresses Get your free copy of "PostMaster" at http://www.mailserve.net/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No of concurrent requests per session
Hello George, I tried out as you have suggested by adding the registry key entry "MaxConnectionsPerServer" under "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings" with a value more than 2. After that, IE spans more than two concurrent requests to the same domain. Why I mentioned about Firefox was no one in the thread cleary stated that it is the same behaviour in Firefox. So I decided to make a post wishing later some one will be benefitted from that information since I have tested the behaviuor with Firefox 1.0.7. And as you can see, the community again benefitted from that posting since Wade posted the necessary info for setting max connections in FireFox also. thanks and regards, -- Kannan. -Original Message- From: George Sexton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 6:03 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: No of concurrent requests per session So? As someone else pointed out. That's what the standard recommends. You really didn't even bother to find the registry key that I mentioned did you? George Sexton MH Software, Inc. http://www.mhsoftware.com/ Voice: 303 438 9585 > -Original Message- > From: Abhilash Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 9:45 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: No of concurrent requests per session > > Hello: > > Thanking everyone for words of wisdom .. > > I checked with firefox 1.0.7 also. It is also showing the > same behaviour as > with IE. > > thanks and regards, > > -- Kannan. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 9:58 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: No of concurrent requests per session > > > I suspect the problem relates to pipelining of HTTP 1.1 > requests over a > single persistent TCP connection. Pipelining is intended to improve > efficiency, allowing the need for multiple images to present > a web page be > expressed to a web server one after another, before any of > the responses > are given. However, the responses must be presented in the > same order as > the requests, and therein lies your problem. If your short running > request is issued over the same TCP connection as one of the > earlier, yet > to be responded to, long running requests, the response to the later > request must wait for the earlier request to be responded to > first. In > this scenario, you need to get either the browser or the web server to > stop using persistent connections. Of course, this may make it less > efficient for serving up "normal" web pages. > > > > Please respond to "Tomcat Users List" > > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" > cc: > Subject:RE: No of concurrent requests per session > > > > I'm guessing this is more of a browser issue. If you're using > IE, I seem > to > recall there is a registry entry that lets you set the > maximum concurrent > requests. > > George Sexton > MH Software, Inc. > http://www.mhsoftware.com/ > Voice: 303 438 9585 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Abhilash Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 6:43 AM > > To: Tomcat Users List > > Subject: No of concurrent requests per session > > > > Hello: > > > > I am using Tomcat 5.0.30 with HTTP 1.1 Connector. If I try > > to make a third request while two other request's (which i > > have already made) responses have not yet arrived, then > > Tomcat is not serving the request until one of the pending > > response arrives. This limits me to only two pending requests > > (irrespective of the webapp) at a time. > > > > My front app is like a dashboard which integarates > multiple > web apps of > which some are reporting apps which requires 4 to > > 7 minutes to process a request and some are data processing > > apps which requires only seconds to process the request. > > Assume the user clicks on two reporting links which open up > > as new windows from the main app window. Now when he clicks > > on another link irrespctive of the webapp, nothing happens > > until one of the reporting request's response is arrived. > > This problem appears only if the requests belong to the > same session. > > > > Any pointers / advices will be greatly appreciated. > > > > thanks and regards, > > > > -- Kannan. > > > > > > > > -- > > Amritha Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, India > >Sent using "PostMaster" by QuantumLink Communications > > One Internet account, unlimited personal e-mail addresses > > Get your free copy of "PostMaster" at http://www.mailserve.net/ > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands,
Re: Tomcat 5.5.15 Clustering ?
Hey,
1) Clustering need sticky_session=true and is only design for
failover (see servlet spec).
2) Are your sure that MULTICAST is enabled at eth0?
regards
Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am 15.02.2006 um 02:26 schrieb David Avenante:
Hi,
I' ve try to use Tomcat 5.5.15 in cluster mod. And after some work on
configuration and test
i seems to be on limit of my all possibilities ;)
I try to use two tomcat in cluster with apache web server and
mod_jk as
connector.
my Apache configuration look like :
# workers.properties
ps=/
# List the workers name
worker.list=loadbalancer
#
# First worker
#
worker.node01.port=8009
worker.node01.host=agnes
worker.node01.type=ajp13
worker.node01.lbfactor=1
#worker.node01.domain=cluster1
#
# Second worker
#
worker.node02.port=9009
worker.node02.host=ovea-inspiron
worker.node02.type=ajp13
worker.node02.lbfactor=1
#worker.node02.domain=cluster1
# --
# Load Balancer worker
# --
worker.loadbalancer.type=lb
worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=false
worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers=node01,node02
As you can see i use two server ('agnes' IP : 192.168.2.102 and
'ovea-inspiron' IP : 192.168.2.103)
I' ve coded a little aplication who read un file and create a
sessions if
session not exist.
If i use the system in mod load balancing (with no cluster mod
activate)
all is great (my config is of course
worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=true
)
So system run with session affinitu but the two server are
accessible ;)
Now i try to configure as cluster mode with session replication
(my config is now worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=3Dfalse)
I configure my to server.xml like that :
agnes (IP : 192.168.2.102)
description="User database that can be updated
and saved"
factory="
org.apache.catalina.users.MemoryUserDatabaseFactory"
pathname="conf/tomcat-users.xml" />
connectionTimeout="2"
disableUploadTimeout="true"
/>
jvmRoute="node01" >
className="org.apache.catalina.cluster.tcp.SimpleTcpCluster"
doClusterLog="true"
clusterLogName="clusterlog"
manager.className="
org.apache.catalina.cluster.session.DeltaManager"
manager.expireSessionsOnShutdown="false"
manager.notifyListenersOnReplication="true"
manager.notifySessionListenersOnReplication="true"
manager.sendAllSessions="true"
manager.sendAllSessionsSize="500"
manager.sendAllSessionsWaitTime="20">
ovea-inspiron (IP : 192.168.2.103)
description="User database that can be updated
and
saved"
factory="
org.apache.catalina.users.MemoryUserDatabaseFactory"
pathname="conf/tomcat-users.xml" />
connectionTimeout="2"
disableUploadTimeout="true"
/>
className="org.apache.catalina.cluster.tcp.SimpleTcpCluster"
doClusterLog="true"
clusterLogName="clusterlog"
manager.className="
org.apache.catalina.cluster.session.DeltaManager"
manager.expireSessionsOnShutdown="false"
manager.notifyListenersOnReplication="true"
manager.notifySessionListenersOnReplication="true"
manager.sendAllSessions="true"
manager.sendAllSessionsSize="500"
manager.sendAllSessionsWaitTime="20">
I'm user linux so i've compiled my kernel with multicat kernel option
I add the rout like rooute add -host 224.0.0.1 dev eth0
N.B : why 224.0.0.1 => http://www.iana.org/assignments/multicast-
addresses
So route is :
ALL-SYSTEMS.MCA * 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 eth0
192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0
00
eth0
loopback* 255.0.0.0U 0 0
0 lo
default . 0.0.0.0 UG
0 0
0 eth0
now i start the two tomcat with the same application in webapp
directories
with tcpdump i verify the multicasting btewen my server .. so :
19:39:17.809978 IP 192.168.2.102.45564 > all-systems.mcast.net.
45564:UDP,
length 56
19:39:18.546034 IP ovea-inspiron.45564 > all-systems.mcast.net.
45564:UDP,
length 56
19:39:18.814418 IP 192.168.2.102.45564 > all-systems.mcast.net.
45564UDP,
length 56
19:39:19.790470 IP ovea-inspiron.45564 > all-systems.mcast.net.
45564:UDP,
length 56
19:39:19.818691 IP 192.168.2.102.45564 > all-systems.mcast.net.
45564:UDP,
length 56
19:39:20.826650 IP 192.168.2.102.45564 > all-systems.mcast.net.
45564:UDP,
len
How can we capture all errors without defining it
Hi, I would like to know, if we can capture all the errors to a servlet without defining the list of errors in web.xml as follows.. generally, we can capture an error like this: 400 /errorHandler . . . is this possible? (see below) AllErrors /errorHandler or is there any other mechanism? Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Setting up a parallel test environment on the same machine as main server
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 01:13, Tim Lucia wrote:
> The http host header is sent by the user-agent ("browser") based on the
> address requested in the URL. This is how virtual hosts are
> differentiated. Tomcat supports a container for virtual host
> differentiation, just like Apache does. You do not need to change the
> workers at all. Tomcat sees the same host header that Apache does. I.e.,
> using Tamper Data and FireFox, I see
>
> Host=www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
Yes - I get that part.
>
> When I request your web site. (Along with a photo of you, presumably, in a
> tie & sunglasses ;-) You might also want to send just "Apache" for the
> server, rather then
Yes its me (although they are my normal glasses that I wear all the time -
they just have light sensitive lenses), taken at my daughters graduation from
Southampton University in the summer 2004 :-)
>
> Server=Apache/2.0.54 (Debian GNU/Linux) mod_auth_pgsql/2.0.2b1 DAV/2
> SVN/1.1.4 mod_jk/1.2.14 mod_python/3.1.3 Python/2.3.5 PHP/4.3.10-16
> mod_ssl/2.0.54 OpenSSL/0.9.7e mod-xslt/1.0.0rc1
>
> As it is "more secure". How to do this was recently discussed on this
> list.
Low priority - but I'll look at it.
>
> So, you should have two virtual hosts (by name) in both server.xml and
> httpd.conf. Not sure how to solve the https problem -- never tried to
> myself.
This is where I get lost. I currently have two virtual hosts on apache
pointing at the same virtual host on tomcat ALL with different names - so
this doesn't square with what you are saying of there being a one to one
mapping.
This server is running linux, with two ethernet cards. On the WAN side (which
is what you can see) my ISP allocated via dhcp a single IP address. That is
the www.chandlerfamily.org.uk address. On the lan side, I can allocate
multiple IP addresses to the card in a set of "psuedo devices", so at the
moment it has address 192.168.0.20 and 192.168.0.30, 31, 32 and 39. Each of
these is given separate names such as roo.home, appserv.home, webmail.home
money.home and test.home by a nameserver also running on that machine
On apache I have a number of virtual hosts set up (but because of the https
problem they MUST be differenciated by ip address). At the moment I have the
virtual hosts www.chandlerfamily.org.uk and money.home directing traffic to
tomcat on the host appserv.home (the home page you saw was being generated in
a java application).
I want to add a tomcat host to serve java applications to an apache virtual
host running on test.home. If I understand you correctly you would advocate
creating additional elements of my server.xml file with names of
www.chandlerfamily.org.uk and test.home (I presume I have to keep default
host of appserv.home just so that tomcat knows which ip address to listen
on). If I do that how do I pick up traffic to money.home? add another
statement with repeated contexts?
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
Open Source. It's the difference between trust and antitrust.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: App will work on localhost but blank on client PC.
The 2k3s does not run a firewall, we have the router performing that function. Pages on port 80 through IIS load fine. I will try configuring the router to specifically not block port 8447 to the server and see what happens. -Original Message- From: Pham Anh Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 10:38 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: App will work on localhost but blank on client PC. maybe caused by firewall or something like that ... ? - Original Message - From: "Alexander Alekseev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 10:00 AM Subject: RE: App will work on localhost but blank on client PC. > Server is 192.168.2.100, client is 192.168.2.X > > We tried using http://192.168.2.100:8447/ from the client, and the blank > problem first cropped up. > > Now, instead of http://localhost:8447/ we tried http://192.168.2.100:8447/ > from the server itself, and it also comes up blank. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Mike Sabroff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 9:55 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: App will work on localhost but blank on client PC. > >>How does localhost resolve in that scenario...why not use the hostname >>or ip address > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
