RE: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux
Hi Your previous posts indicated that you were doing some kind of test Since Most of the Development happens on the WINDOWS 2000 machine, Delay in dev lifecycles results in time lag for Production /Test cases and Deployment For a Dev company of 100 People Tomcat request / Response may be one of these cases Compared to JBOSS ( With Embedded Tomcat) server usage which we validated and found to be wastage of memory / App server usage compared to Web server like Tomcat 6.0.20 alone for usage Also like to mention 1 more test case is we earlier used TOMCAT 5.5.23 on the same system's which was never any dev delay cause. Regards karthik -Original Message- From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 9:38 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux Karthik Nanjangude wrote: ... When something is in Production it really gets pickles to upgrade the Jdk /OS , Realy worried :( Karthik, generally speaking, the gurus on this list - of which I am not - tend to be sceptical about benchmarks. That is because, as Mark indicated in another thread a couple of days ago, you can make a benchmark that will tell you anything you want. It is incredibly difficult to create a real benchmark that will really tell you something worthwhile. The best benchmark you can have, is to use your own application, in conditions as close as possible to production, and see how it behaves. Your previous posts indicated that you were doing some kind of test, presumably to obtain some valid information that you can then use to deploy an application on one server rather than another. To get such valid information, you must take a number of precautions, otherwise your results will be nonsense, and will ultimately lead you to take the wrong decision. What the various people answering you so far have tried to do, is to tell you that, in their more or less expert opinion, the conditions in which you are doing these tests now, according to the data you provide, do not so far look as if you would get valid results out of them. Tomcat runs inside of a Java JVM, which in the principle should isolate the Java program (in this case Tomcat) from the underlying OS. There is no reason /in principle/ why a Tomcat application would run slower under a Windows OS than under a Linux OS. But there are so many external dependencies, like : the hardware, the memory available to Java, the Java version itself, your command-line switches to start Java, the network, what else is running on the machine, and so on, that this kind of comparison is bound to disappoint you. And testing with a HelloWorld JSP page, is in no way comparable to what will happen to your real application and real server under load. There exist tools that will issue automatically a number of requests simultaneously and over a period of time, to a webserver, and that will produce nice results, sorted in a table, easy to read. You may be able to use them to issue real requests, to your real application. That would be a much better test. But it will still not compensate from testing on two different servers which, on the face of it, look like they are quite different, even abstracting the OS. And because you are using quite old versions of software, it is unlikely that anyone of the few people on this list that would be willing to help, would actually be able to do so. That is because thay could not check any result that you have, with a comparable system that they have. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [OT] deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux
On 09/12/2009 19:26, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pid, On 12/9/2009 1:22 PM, Pid wrote: On 09/12/2009 18:01, Christopher Schultz wrote: Pid, On 12/9/2009 9:15 AM, Pid wrote: [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -a Linux teleglb.xius.ltd 2.6.9-42.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jul 12 23:27:17 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux So you appear to have 2 processors in the linux machine. Or maybe three: two i686 and one i386. Sweet! I've never seen 'uname' spit out multiple and/or different values for the architecture. uname -a does on various of my linux servers. one for each processor and one for the OS architecture. a 64bit example: Linux hostname 2.6.21.7-2.fc8xen #1 SMP Fri Feb 15 12:34:28 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Interesting. On a dual Xeon (under a VM, which may cloud the issue somewhat), I only see the one notation from 'uname', while there are clearly two logical (and probably two physical) processors: $ uname -a Linux [hostname] 2.6.26-2-openvz-686 #1 SMP Sun Jun 21 07:07:25 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux $ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 4 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.40GHz stepping: 10 cpu MHz : 3400.371 cache size : 2048 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 1 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 5 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm constant_tsc pebs bts pni monitor ds_cpl est cid cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips: 6807.98 clflush size: 64 power management: processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 4 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.40GHz stepping: 10 cpu MHz : 3400.371 cache size : 2048 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 1 apicid : 1 initial apicid : 1 fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 5 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm constant_tsc pebs bts pni monitor ds_cpl est cid cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips: 6800.62 clflush size: 64 power management: $ uname -i unknown $ uname -p unknown $ uname -m i686 I guess the output depends quite a bit on the environment. Or perhaps, distro? This is curious. I think I'll keep an eye out next time I'm on different linux variants. p - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAksf+d8ACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBusgCgljPKF6Nu8Egty9aEcKvfJWIN aXUAnjp3wKPey+n2wE8jJ405usiXKV22 =Zz2r -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux
Hi We have deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20on Windows / Linux 1) In case of Windows the Catalina. out is not generated in /log folder while on Linux the same is generated on every start 2) Tomcat on windows is Slow compared to Linux in request /response Why is this ? Os/ : Windows 2000 / Linux JDK 1.5 TOMCAT 6.0.20 With regards Karthik
Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux
2009/12/9 Karthik Nanjangude karthik.nanjang...@xius-bcgi.com We have deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20on Windows / Linux Just to check: in both cases, you downloaded the same installation files from http://tomcat.apache.org and installed them? Exactly the same JVM revision on both machines? Exactly the same hardware configuration on both machines? Exactly the same amount of memory given to Tomcat on both machines? 1) In case of Windows the Catalina. out is not generated in /log folder while on Linux the same is generated on every start 2) Tomcat on windows is Slow compared to Linux in request /response I could crack jokes about Windows 2000 here, but I won't ;-). Why is this ? Os/ : Windows 2000 / Linux JDK 1.5 Which revision on each machine? TOMCAT 6.0.20 - Peter
Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux
Karthik Nanjangude wrote: Hi We have deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20on Windows / Linux 1) In case of Windows the Catalina. out is not generated in /log folder while on Linux the same is generated on every start 2) Tomcat on windows is Slow compared to Linux in request /response Why is this ? Os/ : Windows 2000 / Linux JDK 1.5 TOMCAT 6.0.20 Karthik, You must understand that your second question (if it is a question) is impossible to answer : you do not define slow; we know nothing about the systems; we know nothing about the measurement system you use; etc.. (i could go on for a long time). But in addition, even if we knew all that, nobody here has the time to do your homework for you. About your first question : you did not tell us which Linux you use, or where this Tomcat 6.0.20 comes from. You don't tell us which java 1.5 you use. You could look into the Tomcat startup scripts, and see where it mentions that file Catalina.out. As for Windows, the same information is probably to find in the Windows Event logs (assuming you are running Tomcat as a Service, which you do not tell us either). Also, both Windows 2000 and Java 1.5 are in the no longer supported category. So your chances of getting useful answers are limited. For complementary information, read : http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux
Hi Os/ : Windows 2000 / Linux Same Tomcat 6.0.20 from http://opensource.become.com/apache/tomcat/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/bin/apache-tomcat-6.0.20.zip RAM is 2 GB on Linux on Windows is 1.5 GB No extra applications are running when the same was executed Machine details Windows 2000 4 CPU 2.66GHz Service Pack 4 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0-b64) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0-b64, mixed mode, sharing) Linux [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -o GNU/Linux [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -a Linux teleglb.xius.ltd 2.6.9-42.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jul 12 23:27:17 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -i i386 [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -p i686 [r...@teleglb bin]# java -version java version 1.5.0_18 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_18-b02) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.5.0_18-b02, mixed mode) Why is this ? Need to deploy same Application over 2 O/s for verifications / validation of Tomcat Also, both Windows 2000 and Java 1.5 are in the no longer supported Off the topic - Does this mean Every Hardware /S/w for 6 months needs replacement With regards karthik -Original Message- From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com [mailto:peter.crowth...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Peter Crowther Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 7:04 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux 2009/12/9 Karthik Nanjangude karthik.nanjang...@xius-bcgi.com We have deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20on Windows / Linux Just to check: in both cases, you downloaded the same installation files from http://tomcat.apache.org and installed them? Exactly the same JVM revision on both machines? Exactly the same hardware configuration on both machines? Exactly the same amount of memory given to Tomcat on both machines? 1) In case of Windows the Catalina. out is not generated in /log folder while on Linux the same is generated on every start 2) Tomcat on windows is Slow compared to Linux in request /response I could crack jokes about Windows 2000 here, but I won't ;-). Why is this ? Os/ : Windows 2000 / Linux JDK 1.5 Which revision on each machine? TOMCAT 6.0.20 - Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux
2009/12/9 Karthik Nanjangude karthik.nanjang...@xius-bcgi.com Same Tomcat 6.0.20 from http://opensource.become.com/apache/tomcat/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/bin/apache-tomcat-6.0.20.zip OK. RAM is 2 GB on Linux on Windows is 1.5 GB No extra applications are running when the same was executed How much of that RAM is given to Tomcat in each case? Machine details Windows 2000 4 CPU 2.66GHz Service Pack 4 OK. I can't compare that to the Linux box, as you don't give the same details. Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0-b64) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0-b64, mixed mode, sharing) A couple of differences compared to the Linux box: - A much older JVM, I think - this looks like the original 1.5 release, compared to 1.5.0_18 on Linux. - The client VM rather than the server VM is running. I would expect both of these to slow down the Windows box. Linux [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -o GNU/Linux [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -a Linux teleglb.xius.ltd 2.6.9-42.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jul 12 23:27:17 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -i i386 [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -p i686 [r...@teleglb bin]# java -version java version 1.5.0_18 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_18-b02) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.5.0_18-b02, mixed mode) None of this gives any information on number of processors, speed of processors etc. As Andre points out, you also don't give any information on the tests you're running, which makes it difficult to know what you're actually comparing. For example, if your webapp accesses an external database, the version of the database software will make a massive difference. What are you testing? Also, both Windows 2000 and Java 1.5 are in the no longer supported Off the topic - Does this mean Every Hardware /S/w for 6 months needs replacement No, but it means you're on your own if something goes wrong. As with all businesses, yours needs to trade off the expected cost of upgrade (including the disruption) with the expected cost of supporting the old versions. I'm not arguing with you - I still see the odd NT 4.0 box, and several Windows 98s ;-). - Peter
Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux
On 09/12/2009 14:12, Peter Crowther wrote: 2009/12/9 Karthik Nanjangudekarthik.nanjang...@xius-bcgi.com Same Tomcat 6.0.20 from http://opensource.become.com/apache/tomcat/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/bin/apache-tomcat-6.0.20.zip OK. RAM is 2 GB on Linux on Windows is 1.5 GB No extra applications are running when the same was executed How much of that RAM is given to Tomcat in each case? Machine details Windows 2000 4 CPU 2.66GHz Service Pack 4 OK. I can't compare that to the Linux box, as you don't give the same details. Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0-b64) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0-b64, mixed mode, sharing) A couple of differences compared to the Linux box: - A much older JVM, I think - this looks like the original 1.5 release, compared to 1.5.0_18 on Linux. - The client VM rather than the server VM is running. I would expect both of these to slow down the Windows box. Linux [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -o GNU/Linux [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -a Linux teleglb.xius.ltd 2.6.9-42.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jul 12 23:27:17 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux So you appear to have 2 processors in the linux machine. p [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -i i386 [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -p i686 [r...@teleglb bin]# java -version java version 1.5.0_18 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_18-b02) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.5.0_18-b02, mixed mode) None of this gives any information on number of processors, speed of processors etc. As Andre points out, you also don't give any information on the tests you're running, which makes it difficult to know what you're actually comparing. For example, if your webapp accesses an external database, the version of the database software will make a massive difference. What are you testing? Also, both Windows 2000 and Java 1.5 are in the no longer supported Off the topic - Does this mean Every Hardware /S/w for 6 months needs replacement No, but it means you're on your own if something goes wrong. As with all businesses, yours needs to trade off the expected cost of upgrade (including the disruption) with the expected cost of supporting the old versions. I'm not arguing with you - I still see the odd NT 4.0 box, and several Windows 98s ;-). - Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux
Karthik Nanjangude wrote: Also, both Windows 2000 and Java 1.5 are in the no longer supported Off the topic - Does this mean Every Hardware /S/w for 6 months needs replacement Not really off the topic, if you are talking about comparisons and benchmarks. http://java.sun.com/products/archive/eol.policy.html This is a fast-moving technical area. After 6 months, no. After 5+ years, probably yes. I have heard that in terms of computers, it was like with dogs. If you want to compare this with a human timespan, you should multiply by 7. So your Java is 35 years old, in internet-years terms. Your Windows OS is even older. Your Linux kernel, from the number, dates from about 2005, so it is 20 internet years old. One of your systems seems to be 64-bit, the other seems to be 32-bit. My point was : if you are trying to measure things for comparative performance, and you want people here to help you figure out possible differences, you should not pick machines and OS's which not many people are using anymore. That strongly reduces the number of people /able/ to help you. You still did not tell us what you are measuring, or how you are measuring it. And you did not tell us your definition of slow (or slower). Like, is one system processing 100 similar transactions per second, and the other one only 98 ? And you obviously did not read the link I referred you to. The main point is : people here /donate/ their time to answer questions. The least you can do is to make your questions attractive and answerable. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux
Peter Crowther wrote: ... - A much older JVM, I think - this looks like the original 1.5 release, compared to 1.5.0_18 on Linux. - The client VM rather than the server VM is running. I would expect both of these to slow down the Windows box. Especially the client vs server vm, IME. D - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux
Hi As Andre points out, you also don't give any information on the tests you're running, which makes it difficult to know what you're actually comparing. For example, if your webapp accesses an external database, the version of the database software will make a massive difference. Most of the development happens on the Individual Dev's system Windows 2000 While the deployment is on the Linux Box for final product integration /Load test Forget the web application with DB /Connection / A Single Simple JSP ( Hello world ) is taking longer on both browsers IE 6 /FireFox 3 both Windows 2000 and Java 1.5 are in the no longer supported When something is in Production it really gets pickles to upgrade the Jdk /OS , Realy worried :( With regards Karthik -Original Message- From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com [mailto:peter.crowth...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Peter Crowther Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 7:43 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux 2009/12/9 Karthik Nanjangude karthik.nanjang...@xius-bcgi.com Same Tomcat 6.0.20 from http://opensource.become.com/apache/tomcat/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/bin/apache-tomcat-6.0.20.zip OK. RAM is 2 GB on Linux on Windows is 1.5 GB No extra applications are running when the same was executed How much of that RAM is given to Tomcat in each case? Machine details Windows 2000 4 CPU 2.66GHz Service Pack 4 OK. I can't compare that to the Linux box, as you don't give the same details. Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0-b64) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0-b64, mixed mode, sharing) A couple of differences compared to the Linux box: - A much older JVM, I think - this looks like the original 1.5 release, compared to 1.5.0_18 on Linux. - The client VM rather than the server VM is running. I would expect both of these to slow down the Windows box. Linux [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -o GNU/Linux [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -a Linux teleglb.xius.ltd 2.6.9-42.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jul 12 23:27:17 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -i i386 [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -p i686 [r...@teleglb bin]# java -version java version 1.5.0_18 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_18-b02) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.5.0_18-b02, mixed mode) None of this gives any information on number of processors, speed of processors etc. As Andre points out, you also don't give any information on the tests you're running, which makes it difficult to know what you're actually comparing. For example, if your webapp accesses an external database, the version of the database software will make a massive difference. What are you testing? Also, both Windows 2000 and Java 1.5 are in the no longer supported Off the topic - Does this mean Every Hardware /S/w for 6 months needs replacement No, but it means you're on your own if something goes wrong. As with all businesses, yours needs to trade off the expected cost of upgrade (including the disruption) with the expected cost of supporting the old versions. I'm not arguing with you - I still see the odd NT 4.0 box, and several Windows 98s ;-). - Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux
Karthik Nanjangude wrote: Hi As Andre points out, you also don't give any information on the tests you're running, which makes it difficult to know what you're actually comparing. For example, if your webapp accesses an external database, the version of the database software will make a massive difference. Most of the development happens on the Individual Dev's system Windows 2000 While the deployment is on the Linux Box for final product integration /Load test Forget the web application with DB /Connection / A Single Simple JSP ( Hello world ) is taking longer on both browsers IE 6 /FireFox 3 both Windows 2000 and Java 1.5 are in the no longer supported When something is in Production it really gets pickles to upgrade the Jdk /OS , Realy worried :( You should be able to update to the last jre 5 version with no trouble at all, and 6 will have about a 95% chance of working with no issues. Those don't take long (only a few minutes), and you can wait a while before upgrading the OS. D - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux
Karthik Nanjangude wrote: ... When something is in Production it really gets pickles to upgrade the Jdk /OS , Realy worried :( Karthik, generally speaking, the gurus on this list - of which I am not - tend to be sceptical about benchmarks. That is because, as Mark indicated in another thread a couple of days ago, you can make a benchmark that will tell you anything you want. It is incredibly difficult to create a real benchmark that will really tell you something worthwhile. The best benchmark you can have, is to use your own application, in conditions as close as possible to production, and see how it behaves. Your previous posts indicated that you were doing some kind of test, presumably to obtain some valid information that you can then use to deploy an application on one server rather than another. To get such valid information, you must take a number of precautions, otherwise your results will be nonsense, and will ultimately lead you to take the wrong decision. What the various people answering you so far have tried to do, is to tell you that, in their more or less expert opinion, the conditions in which you are doing these tests now, according to the data you provide, do not so far look as if you would get valid results out of them. Tomcat runs inside of a Java JVM, which in the principle should isolate the Java program (in this case Tomcat) from the underlying OS. There is no reason /in principle/ why a Tomcat application would run slower under a Windows OS than under a Linux OS. But there are so many external dependencies, like : the hardware, the memory available to Java, the Java version itself, your command-line switches to start Java, the network, what else is running on the machine, and so on, that this kind of comparison is bound to disappoint you. And testing with a HelloWorld JSP page, is in no way comparable to what will happen to your real application and real server under load. There exist tools that will issue automatically a number of requests simultaneously and over a period of time, to a webserver, and that will produce nice results, sorted in a table, easy to read. You may be able to use them to issue real requests, to your real application. That would be a much better test. But it will still not compensate from testing on two different servers which, on the face of it, look like they are quite different, even abstracting the OS. And because you are using quite old versions of software, it is unlikely that anyone of the few people on this list that would be willing to help, would actually be able to do so. That is because thay could not check any result that you have, with a comparable system that they have. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [OT] deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pid, On 12/9/2009 9:15 AM, Pid wrote: [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -a Linux teleglb.xius.ltd 2.6.9-42.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jul 12 23:27:17 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux So you appear to have 2 processors in the linux machine. Or maybe three: two i686 and one i386. Sweet! I've never seen 'uname' spit out multiple and/or different values for the architecture. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAksf5eoACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PA7IgCeI+5oP0IZeWmyrUM48Cn3QpSL RdwAnAhWVRHK0Wzw7OhuoOEXR4peddzH =umvo -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [OT] deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux
On 09/12/2009 18:01, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pid, On 12/9/2009 9:15 AM, Pid wrote: [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -a Linux teleglb.xius.ltd 2.6.9-42.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jul 12 23:27:17 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux So you appear to have 2 processors in the linux machine. Or maybe three: two i686 and one i386. Sweet! I've never seen 'uname' spit out multiple and/or different values for the architecture. uname -a does on various of my linux servers. one for each processor and one for the OS architecture. a 64bit example: Linux hostname 2.6.21.7-2.fc8xen #1 SMP Fri Feb 15 12:34:28 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux p - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAksf5eoACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PA7IgCeI+5oP0IZeWmyrUM48Cn3QpSL RdwAnAhWVRHK0Wzw7OhuoOEXR4peddzH =umvo -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [OT] deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pid, On 12/9/2009 1:22 PM, Pid wrote: On 09/12/2009 18:01, Christopher Schultz wrote: Pid, On 12/9/2009 9:15 AM, Pid wrote: [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -a Linux teleglb.xius.ltd 2.6.9-42.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jul 12 23:27:17 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux So you appear to have 2 processors in the linux machine. Or maybe three: two i686 and one i386. Sweet! I've never seen 'uname' spit out multiple and/or different values for the architecture. uname -a does on various of my linux servers. one for each processor and one for the OS architecture. a 64bit example: Linux hostname 2.6.21.7-2.fc8xen #1 SMP Fri Feb 15 12:34:28 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Interesting. On a dual Xeon (under a VM, which may cloud the issue somewhat), I only see the one notation from 'uname', while there are clearly two logical (and probably two physical) processors: $ uname -a Linux [hostname] 2.6.26-2-openvz-686 #1 SMP Sun Jun 21 07:07:25 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux $ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 4 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.40GHz stepping: 10 cpu MHz : 3400.371 cache size : 2048 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 1 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 5 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm constant_tsc pebs bts pni monitor ds_cpl est cid cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips: 6807.98 clflush size: 64 power management: processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 4 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.40GHz stepping: 10 cpu MHz : 3400.371 cache size : 2048 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 1 apicid : 1 initial apicid : 1 fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 5 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm constant_tsc pebs bts pni monitor ds_cpl est cid cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips: 6800.62 clflush size: 64 power management: $ uname -i unknown $ uname -p unknown $ uname -m i686 I guess the output depends quite a bit on the environment. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAksf+d8ACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBusgCgljPKF6Nu8Egty9aEcKvfJWIN aXUAnjp3wKPey+n2wE8jJ405usiXKV22 =Zz2r -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
