Re: Alternative method to initialise page
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:55 PM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1 - Checking against adding components more than once to be fair this one doesnt apply. wicket throws a pretty descriptive exception if you forget to call super.onbeforerender(), also its javadoc mentions that overrides must call super. too bad there isnt an annotation yet that checks this at compile time. -igor 2 - requirement to call super.onBeforeRender() and so would be significantly better - especially if this is a common pattern. John -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Alternative-method-to-initialise-page-tp16742636p16918361.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it kosher to have wicket-event.js and wicket-ajax.js contributed on every ajax update?
The AjaxPagingNavigator is header-contributing wicket-event.js and wicket-ajax.js everytime a link is clicked. There must be something in these js to make this ok?
Re: Is it kosher to have wicket-event.js and wicket-ajax.js contributed on every ajax update?
wicket will filter out the duplicates on the client side -igor On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The AjaxPagingNavigator is header-contributing wicket-event.js and wicket-ajax.js everytime a link is clicked. There must be something in these js to make this ok? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it kosher to have wicket-event.js and wicket-ajax.js contributed on every ajax update?
filter out the duplicates on the client side How do you do that? Would it be possible to make stuff like scriptaculous effects to work like that? Scriptaculous doesn't work if it's ajax contributed more than once. On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wicket will filter out the duplicates on the client side -igor On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The AjaxPagingNavigator is header-contributing wicket-event.js and wicket-ajax.js everytime a link is clicked. There must be something in these js to make this ok? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gzipping of pages (HTML output, not only resources)
Stefan Simik wrote: /Maybenbsp;itnbsp;cannbsp;worknbsp;fornbsp;yournbsp;applicationsnbsp;withoutnbsp;anynbsp;problemsnbsp;too. Thanks for you response. This filter works most of the time for me. The only problem is when I want to upload a file. I use UploadWebRequest and UploadProgressBar. AFAIK FileUpload closes the stream and because of it the filter throws exception. Artur -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Gzipping-of-pages-%28HTML-output%2C-not-only-resources%29-tp16849900p16921105.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with german error messages in feedback panel
Hello, I have problems with german umlauts in a feedback panel. I define the error messages in a property file. It displays as follows: Bitte geben Sie eine gültige E-Mail ein In my HTML: !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd; ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? meta http-equiv=Content-type content=text/html; charset=utf-8 / ... My editor is configured to use UTF-8 as encoding. I tried to initialize the Wicket Application with getRequestCycleSettings().setResponseRequestEncoding(UTF-8); but the error is still there. Has someone the same problem? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-german-error-messages-in-feedback-panel-tp16921955p16921955.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with german error messages in feedback panel
Yes I had the same one. After switching my favourite IDE (Netbeans) to UTF-8 Encoding everything was fine. So, either you use Unicode Characters in your String literals, which is plain ugly, or use an editor which is capable of using UTF-8 Encodings. Am Sonntag, 27. April 2008 11:35:16 schrieb greeklinux: Hello, I have problems with german umlauts in a feedback panel. I define the error messages in a property file. It displays as follows: Bitte geben Sie eine gültige E-Mail ein In my HTML: !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd; ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? meta http-equiv=Content-type content=text/html; charset=utf-8 / ... My editor is configured to use UTF-8 as encoding. I tried to initialize the Wicket Application with getRequestCycleSettings().setResponseRequestEncoding(UTF-8); but the error is still there. Has someone the same problem? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: intro and explanation about DataTable and DetachableModel
Thanks Igor and Doug,
I'll check things out when the boss agrees
bbrrr ...
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Doug Donohoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may help. I am moving my DD Poker site to wicket and implemented an
IDataProvider around my database service as follows:
private class HistoryData implements IDataProvider
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 42L;
private PokerUser user;
private int count;
private HistoryData(PokerUser user)
{
this.user = user;
count =
histService.getAllTournamentHistoriesForProfileCount(user.getId());
}
@SuppressWarnings({RawUseOfParameterizedType})
public Iterator iterator(int first, int pagesize)
{
return
histService.getAllTournamentHistoriesForProfile(user.getId(), count,
first,
pagesize).iterator();
}
public int size()
{
return count;
}
public boolean isEmpty()
{
return count == 0;
}
public IModel model(Object object)
{
return new CompoundPropertyModel(new EntityModel(object));
}
public void detach()
{
}
}
Where EntityModel is:
public class EntityModel extends CompoundPropertyModel
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 42L;
/**
* Constructor
*
* @param object The model object, which may or may not implement
IModel
*/
public EntityModel(Object object)
{
super(new NonLoadableDetachableModel(object));
}
}
and NonLoadableDetachableModel is
public class NonLoadableDetachableModel extends LoadableDetachableModel
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 42L;
public NonLoadableDetachableModel(Object model)
{
super(model);
}
@Override
protected Object load()
{
throw new UnsupportedOperationException(load should never be
called);
}
}
I created this last class because my pages are read-only and the result
set
is always fetched through the service. I didn't want to have my (JPA
based)
entities being serialized.
The HistoryData class worked great with the base DataView class in Wicket.
Note that I drew a lot of inspiration from:
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/repeater/
and digging around in the source.
I don't know if this will help you or not - hopefully so!
-Doug
Eyal Golan wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone give me an explanation about paging with DetachableModel?
My problem:
We have records in the DB that can be a-lot.
We also filter them sometimes.
someone in the company created a non-standard paging.
He doesn't use the Wicket's paging.
The iterator method of the DataProvider he created returns only the
number
of elements that should be displayed in the current page.
Eg. suppose we decided we show 20 records per page.
The DataProvider keeps track on which page we're at.
Then he calculates the indexes of records.
It's done in getVisibleTickets() method.
int fromIndex = (currentPage - 1) * (ticketsPerPage);
int toIndex = ticketsPerPage;
And then he asks the DB for the records in this range (with the filter).
This is the size() method:
public int size() {
if ((visibleTickets == null) || (update)) {
getVisibleTickets();
}
return visibleTickets.size();
}
OK, I hope i was clear enough.
I know that it might be done using Wicket's library.
Can anyone explain?
Thanks
--
Eyal Golan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/intro-and-explanation-about-DataTable-and-DetachableModel-tp16852272p16853277.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Eyal Golan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
Re: Alternative method to initialise page
John Patterson wrote: Hi, I am extending the PagingNavigatation and need to access some member variables to create my page links. Because these links are created in PagingNavigatation's constructor me subclasses newPagingNavigationLink() method is called before my subclasses member variables are initialised. I realised that this situation must occur quite often when extending any class that allows subclasses to provide or override any components. Does anyone have a nice workaround? It seems to me that creating the pages component tree in some kind of initialisation step would make classes easier to extend. Or is there already a method that should be used to do this? Thanks, John I had similar problems, when I worked with DefaultDataTable and needed to have custom PagingNavigation. For example, DefaultDataTable has no factory methods for creating custom PagingNavigation so I had to copy-paste it and change some minor parts of the class. But it was very easy and I take the default implementations as an example how to work with them. SS -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Alternative-method-to-initialise-page-tp16742636p16922848.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Alternative method to initialise page
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 01:58:28PM -0700, John Patterson wrote: Note to self: don't post messages when half cut. But I have to break that rule just one more time Heh, no problem. Been there once or twice myself... jk - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what is the preferred way to include a javascript library to a wicket project?
Vitaly Tsaplin schrieb: -- personally i like to be able to simply include the datepicker and not -- have to worry or research what javascript library it uses. i´ve talked this over with some guys personally, and maybe this was discussed before, but consider this: what if components could express contributions by a dependency descriptor (maybe new Dependency(KnownLibs.XY, 1, 2) for xy 1.2) and provide wicket with a javascript integration project, where some versions of XY and others will be packaged? the page could resolve this dependency and actually contribute the header. - first thing that comes to mind, is that if lib XY has init code, that really should run once, and once only, the page has a chance of including it only once, if two components request for it. - second, assuming that later version are always compatible with earlier [yes, i know :) ], the page could decide to resolve to a later version if two components use two different versions of the same lib up to here, the cost of mainting these third party libs is as high, as packaging them with a version descriptor. i really think, that would be doable. - third (now really dreaming) if some version shift is known to break compatibility, the page could ask an handler to resolve this situation or (if unhandled) throw an exception. this makes it possible to a) be aware of using two components that depend on different version of teh same lib and b) to get the PAGE in charge of handling this situation and decide, what to do, as the page is the one thing, the application coder has control over (whereas the components are not). this would of course mean, that the libs desriptor needs to declare that compatibility break and (and here comes the tricky part), those people adding it to the KnownLibs-project have to know about it. what do you think? cu uwe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what is the preferred way to include a javascript library to a wicket project?
-- create a jira issue for the datepicker please For the datepicker only? Shouldn't it be done on the component level and be a part of solid wicket API...? In fact I do not use the datapicker at all what I said was related to the problem that I faced writing my own components. Hi Uwe, Why it should be so complicated... Isn't it better and simpler to be able to just add dependencies by hands overriding the defaults. It's the only practice in the javascript world. Look at YUI or whatever... every component has the inctructions... which libs to include...which css files... and how to use it. Personally I think that java and javascript should be kept as completely independent worlds with a clear conceptual separation since wicket do not even pretend to do such a thing like GWT or Volta do (java - javascript translation). And so an interoperational aspect in wicket are very limited. The client side shouldn't be jailed by the server side anyhow. A javascript developer should always have a change to tweak the tricky nature of javascript. On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Uwe Schäfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vitaly Tsaplin schrieb: -- personally i like to be able to simply include the datepicker and not -- have to worry or research what javascript library it uses. i´ve talked this over with some guys personally, and maybe this was discussed before, but consider this: what if components could express contributions by a dependency descriptor (maybe new Dependency(KnownLibs.XY, 1, 2) for xy 1.2) and provide wicket with a javascript integration project, where some versions of XY and others will be packaged? the page could resolve this dependency and actually contribute the header. - first thing that comes to mind, is that if lib XY has init code, that really should run once, and once only, the page has a chance of including it only once, if two components request for it. - second, assuming that later version are always compatible with earlier [yes, i know :) ], the page could decide to resolve to a later version if two components use two different versions of the same lib up to here, the cost of mainting these third party libs is as high, as packaging them with a version descriptor. i really think, that would be doable. - third (now really dreaming) if some version shift is known to break compatibility, the page could ask an handler to resolve this situation or (if unhandled) throw an exception. this makes it possible to a) be aware of using two components that depend on different version of teh same lib and b) to get the PAGE in charge of handling this situation and decide, what to do, as the page is the one thing, the application coder has control over (whereas the components are not). this would of course mean, that the libs desriptor needs to declare that compatibility break and (and here comes the tricky part), those people adding it to the KnownLibs-project have to know about it. what do you think? cu uwe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with german error messages in feedback panel
Hello, I am using IDEA as IDE. I configured it to use UTF-8. Did I forget something? In the property file it is not possible to write uuml instead of ü, because the will be escaped to amp. Timm Helbig wrote: Yes I had the same one. After switching my favourite IDE (Netbeans) to UTF-8 Encoding everything was fine. So, either you use Unicode Characters in your String literals, which is plain ugly, or use an editor which is capable of using UTF-8 Encodings. Am Sonntag, 27. April 2008 11:35:16 schrieb greeklinux: Hello, I have problems with german umlauts in a feedback panel. I define the error messages in a property file. It displays as follows: Bitte geben Sie eine gültige E-Mail ein In my HTML: !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd; ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? meta http-equiv=Content-type content=text/html; charset=utf-8 / ... My editor is configured to use UTF-8 as encoding. I tried to initialize the Wicket Application with getRequestCycleSettings().setResponseRequestEncoding(UTF-8); but the error is still there. Has someone the same problem? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-german-error-messages-in-feedback-panel-tp16921955p16925025.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RedirectPage - gets stuck in an endless loop
can you go to this login url in a browser at all or does that cause the loop too? (maybe urls that should be going to the other application are being handled by wicket?) mfs wrote: Eventually its throws StackOverFlow exception... Jonathan Locke wrote: some kind of exception being thrown maybe? try debugging it. it's an interesting and educational trip through wicket internals anyway. if you still can't figure it and you think it's not your problem, boil it down to a quickstart example and attach the example to a JIRA bug and someone will take a look at it. jon mfs wrote: Guys, I am using RedirectPage class to redirect to an external url, and strangely it just gets stuck in an endless loop..any idea as to what the problem could be ? i.e. new RedirectPage(Host.getHttpsUrl() + /login) Thanks in advance.. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RedirectPage---gets-stuck-in-an-endless-loop-tp16908835p16925090.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what is the preferred way to include a javascript library to a wicket project?
Vitaly Tsaplin schrieb: hi Vitaly Why it should be so complicated... Isn't it better and simpler to be able to just add dependencies by hands overriding the defaults. what is the aspect, that sounds complicated to you? implementation is near to trivial and about ease of use: in most cases it would not be used by the application coder at all. (just work) i mean, this simple algorithm would work under the covers and - if the components would be kind enough to use it - it´ll resolve most of the time automatically. if not, there would be one and only responsible place for handling this situation. the thing is, i don´t care whatever sillywilli lib is used by any component. what i want is the javascript aspect encapsulated in the components. i really dont want to extend those components just in order to be able to resolve javascript dependencies (that are not even declared in a standardized way) manually. maybe it is just me hating javascript. i anticipate, there can be certain (rare) cases where this would be necessary. thats what the handler/resolver would be for. i think, this would make a nice 90/10 rule. any other comments? cu uwe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Integer only NumberValidator?
You can find the default messages (and keys, obviously) in the org.apache.wicket.Application.properties file. Regards, Al On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Michael Mehrle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Man, of course - I was so focused on NumberValidator that I completely forgot about the Integer.class setting which I already have! Q: what is the validator I need to refer to when defining my custom error message in my properties file? Michael -Original Message- From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 11:46 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Integer only NumberValidator? new TextField(number, ..., Integer.class); Integer-ness is checked at conversion level before validation. Martijn On 4/24/08, Michael Mehrle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Javadoc keeps talking about a factory method to create an Integer based NumberValidator, but I don't see it. How do I create a NumberValidator that only permits Integer values? Thanks, Michael -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what is the preferred way to include a javascript library to a wicket project?
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Vitaly Tsaplin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- create a jira issue for the datepicker please For the datepicker only? Shouldn't it be done on the component level and be a part of solid wicket API...? In fact I do not use the datapicker at all what I said was related to the problem that I faced writing my own components. yes, for datepicker only, afaik that is the only core component that uses 3rd party javascript. there is no way for us to enforce this behavior in any way, users are free to write whatever they want to the header. -igor Hi Uwe, Why it should be so complicated... Isn't it better and simpler to be able to just add dependencies by hands overriding the defaults. It's the only practice in the javascript world. Look at YUI or whatever... every component has the inctructions... which libs to include...which css files... and how to use it. Personally I think that java and javascript should be kept as completely independent worlds with a clear conceptual separation since wicket do not even pretend to do such a thing like GWT or Volta do (java - javascript translation). And so an interoperational aspect in wicket are very limited. The client side shouldn't be jailed by the server side anyhow. A javascript developer should always have a change to tweak the tricky nature of javascript. On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Uwe Schäfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vitaly Tsaplin schrieb: -- personally i like to be able to simply include the datepicker and not -- have to worry or research what javascript library it uses. i´ve talked this over with some guys personally, and maybe this was discussed before, but consider this: what if components could express contributions by a dependency descriptor (maybe new Dependency(KnownLibs.XY, 1, 2) for xy 1.2) and provide wicket with a javascript integration project, where some versions of XY and others will be packaged? the page could resolve this dependency and actually contribute the header. - first thing that comes to mind, is that if lib XY has init code, that really should run once, and once only, the page has a chance of including it only once, if two components request for it. - second, assuming that later version are always compatible with earlier [yes, i know :) ], the page could decide to resolve to a later version if two components use two different versions of the same lib up to here, the cost of mainting these third party libs is as high, as packaging them with a version descriptor. i really think, that would be doable. - third (now really dreaming) if some version shift is known to break compatibility, the page could ask an handler to resolve this situation or (if unhandled) throw an exception. this makes it possible to a) be aware of using two components that depend on different version of teh same lib and b) to get the PAGE in charge of handling this situation and decide, what to do, as the page is the one thing, the application coder has control over (whereas the components are not). this would of course mean, that the libs desriptor needs to declare that compatibility break and (and here comes the tricky part), those people adding it to the KnownLibs-project have to know about it. what do you think? cu uwe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it kosher to have wicket-event.js and wicket-ajax.js contributed on every ajax update?
Wicket filters the contributions on client side (according to the URL) Can explain what is (according to the URL)? Does the filtering apply to any js? If wicket js is filtered on the client side, then I don't know what's going on with this question: http://www.nabble.com/Ajax-postcall-handler-does-not-get-called-every-time-td16659218.html#a16663054 Can you please elaborate on scriptaculous not working? I run into this problem with the lightbox component in wicket-stuff. Lightbox uses scriptaculous. My page also uses scriptaculous so I includes the lib (implements IHeaderContributor and renderHead on the page). On ajax update, the lightbox component contributes scriptaculous. Once that happen, scriptaculous effects stops working. I had to disable lightbox from contributing scriptaculous. Another problem is the lightbox.js needs to be part of the page because it initializes itself on window load event. Lightbox doesn't work if lightbox.js is loaded via ajax because there is no window load event to hook itself up. On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wicket filters the contributions on client side (according to the URL). Can you please elaborate on scriptaculous not working? -Matej On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: filter out the duplicates on the client side How do you do that? Would it be possible to make stuff like scriptaculous effects to work like that? Scriptaculous doesn't work if it's ajax contributed more than once. On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wicket will filter out the duplicates on the client side -igor On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The AjaxPagingNavigator is header-contributing wicket-event.js and wicket-ajax.js everytime a link is clicked. There must be something in these js to make this ok? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Resizable and reorderable grid components. http://www.inmethod.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it kosher to have wicket-event.js and wicket-ajax.js contributed on every ajax update?
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wicket filters the contributions on client side (according to the URL) Can explain what is (according to the URL)? Does the filtering apply to any js? If wicket js is filtered on the client side, then I don't know what's going on with this question: http://www.nabble.com/Ajax-postcall-handler-does-not-get-called-every-time-td16659218.html#a16663054 That would be a wicket bug, is there a jira entry for it? Can you please elaborate on scriptaculous not working? I run into this problem with the lightbox component in wicket-stuff. Lightbox uses scriptaculous. My page also uses scriptaculous so I includes the lib (implements IHeaderContributor and renderHead on the page). On ajax update, the lightbox component contributes scriptaculous. Once that happen, scriptaculous effects stops working. I had to disable lightbox from contributing scriptaculous. Another problem is the lightbox.js needs to be part of the page because it initializes itself on window load event. Lightbox doesn't work if lightbox.js is loaded via ajax because there is no window load event to hook itself up. In that case lightbox needs to be fixed. Dynamically loaded javascript is a common thing. -Matej On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wicket filters the contributions on client side (according to the URL). Can you please elaborate on scriptaculous not working? -Matej On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: filter out the duplicates on the client side How do you do that? Would it be possible to make stuff like scriptaculous effects to work like that? Scriptaculous doesn't work if it's ajax contributed more than once. On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wicket will filter out the duplicates on the client side -igor On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The AjaxPagingNavigator is header-contributing wicket-event.js and wicket-ajax.js everytime a link is clicked. There must be something in these js to make this ok? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Resizable and reorderable grid components. http://www.inmethod.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Resizable and reorderable grid components. http://www.inmethod.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DropDownChoice getting value into the model
Perhaps I'm missing something big time about BoundCompoundPropertyModel. I
removed my loadable detachable model and still can't get it to work
specifically with a dropdown element.
The following works...
FormComponent networks = new DropDownChoice(network, new
PropertyModel(phone, network), networksList);
but the following doesn't
FormComponent networks = new DropDownChoice(network, new
BoundCompoundPropertyModel(phone), networksList);
I've tried stepping into the code but can't resolve the issue. Can anyone
confirm or explain this problem?
Russell Webb wrote:
I am experiencing something similar. My LoadableDetachableModel is wrapped
with a CompoundPropertyModel.
Submitting a TexTField acquires the AttachedCompoundPropertyModel whose
setObject() acquires the target object and persists changes.
CompoundPropertyModel$AttachedCompoundPropertyModel(AbstractPropertyModel).setObject(Object)
line: 146
TextField(Component).setModelObject(Object) line: 2888
TextField(FormComponent).updateModel() line: 1060
Form$19.validate(FormComponent) line: 1754
Submitting the dropdown acquires the read only setObject()
VxsNewUserWizard$3(AbstractReadOnlyModel).setObject(Object) line: 52
BoundCompoundPropertyModel(CompoundPropertyModel).setObject(Object)
line: 72
DropDownChoice(Component).setModelObject(Object) line: 2888
DropDownChoice(FormComponent).updateModel() line: 1060
Form$19.validate(FormComponent) line: 1754
It seems the model is linked to the two components differently and that
this causes different behaviour when using a CompoundPropertyModel (and
perhaps others) like allowing the ReadOnlyModel.setObject to be bypassed.
Russ
igor.vaynberg wrote:
perhaps because your textfield is setting a property of the object
loaded by the model, not the object itself.
-igor
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 1:48 PM, rmattler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply. But you answer doesn't make sense to me.
Why do
loadable models work for a text field but not a drop down? If I have
NY
stored in the database, New York is loaded onto the form but when the
form
is submitted the selected value of the drop down is not saved into the
model. I'm trying to get the selected value stored into the Vendor
object
and a String not a SelectOption.
public class Vendor implements java.io.Serializable {
private String state;
two problems
1) loadable detachable models do not support the setobject() call,
because they are...loadable. so you should use a different kind of
model.
2) yes, selectoption object will be put into your model, dropdown
choice works like this:
DropDownChoiceT(String id, IModelT model, IModelListT choices,
IChoiceRenrererT renderer)
-igor
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/DropDownChoice-getting-value-into-the-model-tp15905486p15907046.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/DropDownChoice-getting-value-into-the-model-tp15905486p16927437.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RedirectPage - gets stuck in an endless loop
I can...as otherwise in that case...this shouldnt work too..which is RequestCycle.get().setRequestTarget(new RedirectRequestTarget(loginURL)) Jonathan Locke wrote: can you go to this login url in a browser at all or does that cause the loop too? (maybe urls that should be going to the other application are being handled by wicket?) mfs wrote: Eventually its throws StackOverFlow exception... Jonathan Locke wrote: some kind of exception being thrown maybe? try debugging it. it's an interesting and educational trip through wicket internals anyway. if you still can't figure it and you think it's not your problem, boil it down to a quickstart example and attach the example to a JIRA bug and someone will take a look at it. jon mfs wrote: Guys, I am using RedirectPage class to redirect to an external url, and strangely it just gets stuck in an endless loop..any idea as to what the problem could be ? i.e. new RedirectPage(Host.getHttpsUrl() + /login) Thanks in advance.. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RedirectPage---gets-stuck-in-an-endless-loop-tp16908835p16927460.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it kosher to have wicket-event.js and wicket-ajax.js contributed on every ajax update?
That would be a wicket bug, is there a jira entry for it?
Just created one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1572
This one should not be called a bug. Open browser first, then start wicket
app, it's fine. But start wicket app first, then open browser, it's not.
What difference do it make? The fix and the explanation will be real
interesting.
In that case lightbox needs to be fixed
lightbox.js does this at the very end:
function initLightbox() { myLightbox = new Lightbox(); }
Event.observe(window, 'load', initLightbox, false);
So how to fix this? Change lightbox.js?
Interview: How Wicket Does Ajax
Some preaching to the choir: JavaLobby has printed an interview with Eelco, Jonathan and Igor regarding Wicket's Ajax implementation. It is quite an informative piece that doesn't hesitate to go a bit deeper into the technology bits. Read it here: http://java.dzone.com/news/interview-how-wicket-does-ajax Martijn -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a hidden field named x is filled by the form action url... a bug?
Hi everyone, It seems that if you add a hidden field named x to your form the field is going to be filled by the form action url :) It should be easy to reproduce. Vitaly - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is the best way to create layouts in Wicket?
Hi there, I'm new to Wicket trying to build my first application :). I've already token a look at Creating layouts using markup inheritance tutorial from the Wicket website, but still have some questions: Suppose that I've a base page which I want that some of my pages inherits the layout from it. What I want to do is to have some protected methods like f.e. appendComponen(final Component comp, String position) and setTitle(String title). The position string In the first method indicates the position where the component in the page should be appended. 1. How can I implement this? 2. Is it possible to define multiple wicket:child / in the base page? Gr. Azzeddine
Change image source on every ajax request
Guys, I have got a keep-alive.gif[?random=timestamp] in my LayoutPage (which every page extends from). I need a way to change the source of this keep-alive image (so as to update the time stamp post-fixed with, so that the browser doesnt fetch it from the cache).and make it a default behavior for all ajax response, and avoid setting the image in AjaxRequestTarget for every ajax-event in every component... Please suggest. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Change-image-source-on-every-ajax-request-tp16930284p16930284.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
loadStringResource(Component component, String key) - correct method to check if the component IS a Page?
Hi, I've written my own class that extends ComponentStringResourceLoader (i might change it to extend some other class) At any rate, when loadStringResource(Component component, String key) is called, and the component is a panel I can call getModel and retrieve the model. When the component is a Page, it comes in as MarkupInheritanceResolver$TransparentWebMarkupContainer - and getModel returns null (even if the page has had the model set). So... how do I determine is the component is a page? - what is the condition I should check? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/loadStringResource%28Component-component%2C-String-key%29---correct-method-to-check-if-the-component-IS-a-Page--tp16930303p16930303.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Change image source on every ajax request
see NonCachingImage -igor On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 7:03 PM, mfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guys, I have got a keep-alive.gif[?random=timestamp] in my LayoutPage (which every page extends from). I need a way to change the source of this keep-alive image (so as to update the time stamp post-fixed with, so that the browser doesnt fetch it from the cache).and make it a default behavior for all ajax response, and avoid setting the image in AjaxRequestTarget for every ajax-event in every component... Please suggest. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Change-image-source-on-every-ajax-request-tp16930284p16930284.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Overridable Authorization
Hello, I have a problem about authorization.I look at wicket-in-action source code and implement authorization from there it work well. I use annotation to tag Pages that is unauthorize. But i just go on circle.Here is my problem: @OverridablePage public class EditUserPage extends OverridableProtectedPage 1. I want to redirect the RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException page to overridable page not to the homepage?(considering the user is already login) 2. If redirected to overridable page, the supervsor will enter the username and password to authorized the user to enter the EditUserPage 3. Then if validated it will redirect to the page where the suppose to be..e.g. EditUserPage 4. Any code samples ??? :) Thanks a lot...Cheers -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Overridable-Authorization-tp16930329p16930329.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
