Re: Anchors in Wicket?
The component is any wicket component in the same page or next page if you know that component. What you are doing, an anchor in a different page, I've solved by writing my own subclass of link where I append the '#rsvp' myself. Michael Mehrle schreef: I don't get it - what is the 'component' in the setAnchor() method? If I set an anchor in a completely different page like this: a href=#rsvp / What do I set as the 'component' in the link's setAnchor? Thanks, Michael -Original Message- From: Thijs Vonk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:39 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Anchors in Wicket? Michael Mehrle wrote: How do create a link that jumps to some anchor in a page? Is there a way to define this in Wicket or do I have to do this manually somehow? Michael yes. use link.setAnchor(Component) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
beginner question about models when having more than one component of the same type on the same page
Hello, I have just begun to use wicket and so far I am very impressed with the framework. I have a question about best practice to solve a problem. I have a component (wicket panel) that contain contact information (like name, address, email, phone, etc) and on a specific web page I want to have two of the contact panels. They of course access different model fields. Now to the question: The labels used for the contact fields are slightly different, so the question is how to best solve this? Since the labels are not the same for the two contact panels I cannot use a ResourceModel as it is because then they would have the same label text. Is the best way to solve this with inheritence or do you have any other solution? Best Regards, /Peter
Re: beginner question about models when having more than one component of the same type on the same page
Can you paste the code for better insight into your problem? 2008/6/11 Peter Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, I have just begun to use wicket and so far I am very impressed with the framework. I have a question about best practice to solve a problem. I have a component (wicket panel) that contain contact information (like name, address, email, phone, etc) and on a specific web page I want to have two of the contact panels. They of course access different model fields. Now to the question: The labels used for the contact fields are slightly different, so the question is how to best solve this? Since the labels are not the same for the two contact panels I cannot use a ResourceModel as it is because then they would have the same label text. Is the best way to solve this with inheritence or do you have any other solution? Best Regards, /Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: beginner question about models when having more than one component of the same type on the same page
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/newuserguide.html#Newuserguide-LocalizationandSkinningofApplications Maurice On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Martin Makundi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you paste the code for better insight into your problem? 2008/6/11 Peter Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, I have just begun to use wicket and so far I am very impressed with the framework. I have a question about best practice to solve a problem. I have a component (wicket panel) that contain contact information (like name, address, email, phone, etc) and on a specific web page I want to have two of the contact panels. They of course access different model fields. Now to the question: The labels used for the contact fields are slightly different, so the question is how to best solve this? Since the labels are not the same for the two contact panels I cannot use a ResourceModel as it is because then they would have the same label text. Is the best way to solve this with inheritence or do you have any other solution? Best Regards, /Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: scriptaculous toaster
Ryan Sonnek wrote: if we reach a point where there are several contributed scriptaculous components, i think it would make sense to create a wicketstuff-scriptaculous-sandbox project that can house them all. +1, if we get to that... the sync and queue methods should be moved off of the core Effect interface and into the AbstractEffect class. that way, the Effect.multiple doesn't need to do a no-op. http://github.com/madrobby/scriptaculous/wikis/core-effects Done. On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:05 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok. But I think that we should be a little carefull splitting up in too many projects... But it's fine with me, so we should just move all the stuff from the fx package away from your project right? Since the other stuff(only the queue part though) I do need to be present or i'll have to build a new project to depend on. Ryan Sonnek wrote: It's a combination of effects(the example effects from scriptaculous), something that fades in shakes and for example squishes.. Did you see the example? I still think this would best be served in a separate project. -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to update parent component from a panel?
Hello Timo, I already rip out your patch and run the testcase it worked but how can i implement/intgerate to my project...do you have a working example project for that? Thanks a lot..Cheers :) Timo Rantalaiho wrote: On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, freak182 wrote: Thats a great patch...it is already been updated in wicket-extensions? so i can download it? No, but if you want to play around with it, a standalone version is here: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12375765/Generic_EventBroadcaster.patch It doesn't change any existing classes, so you can just rip the code and include it in your project. Feedback is welcome :) Some sort of event mechanism is coming to 1.5. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-update-parent-component-from-a-panel--tp17748294p17771941.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: beginner question about models when having more than one component of the same type on the same page
HTML for the panel ((ContactPanel.html):
html xmlns:wicket
wicket:panel
table
tr
tdspan wicket:id=nameLabel/span/td
tdspan wicket:id=name/span/td
/tr
tr
tdspan wicket:id=userNameLabel/span/td
tdspan wicket:id=userName/span/td
/tr
tr
tdspan wicket:id=phoneLabel/span/td
tdspan wicket:id=phone/span/td
/tr
tr
tdspan wicket:id=emailLabel/span/td
tdspan wicket:id=email/span/td
/tr
/table
/wicket:panel
/html
Java code for the panel (ContactPanel.java):
public class ContactPanel extends Panel {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public ContactPanel(String id, IModel model) {
super(id, model);
add(new Label(nameLabel, new ResourceModel(nameLabel)));
add(new Label(name));
add(new Label(userNameLabel, new ResourceModel(userNameLabel)));
add(new Label(userName));
add(new Label(phoneLabel, new ResourceModel(phoneLabel)));
add(new Label(phone));
add(new Label(emailLabel, new ResourceModel(emailLabel)));
add(new Label(email));
}
}
HTML for the page using the panel (VacanyPage.html):
--- snip ---
table
tr
tdspan
wicket:id=hrContactPanel/span/td
/tr
tr
tdspan
wicket:id=hiringManagerPanel/span/td
/tr
/table
--- snip ---
Java code for the page (VacanyPage.java):
--- snip ---
Form form = new Form(vacancyForm, new
CompoundPropertyModel(vacancyReq)) {
--- snip ---
Contact hrContact = new Contact();
form.add(new ContactPanel(hrContactPanel, new
CompoundPropertyModel(hrContact)));
Contact hiringManager = new Contact();
form.add(new ContactPanel(hiringManagerPanel, new
CompoundPropertyModel(hiringManager)));
--- snip ---
Properties file for the page (VacancyPage.properties):
vacancyForm.hrContactPanel.nameLabel=HR Contact:
vacancyForm.hrContactPanel.userNameLabel=HR Contact Username:
vacancyForm.hrContactPanel.phoneLabel=Phone:
vacancyForm.hrContactPanel.emailLabel=Email:
vacancyForm.hiringManagerPanel.nameLabel=Hiring Manager:
vacancyForm.hiringManagerPanel.userNameLabel=Hiring Manager Username:
vacancyForm.hiringManagerPanel.phoneLabel=Phone:
vacancyForm.hiringManagerPanel.emailLabel=Email:
As you can see from the code the VacancyPage has two instances of
ContactPanel and these should have different labels. I have tried different
ways to specify this, but Wicket says it cannot find the labels, so I must
be doing something wrong.
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best Regards,
/Peter
2008/6/11 Martin Makundi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Can you paste the code for better insight into your problem?
2008/6/11 Peter Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I have just begun to use wicket and so far I am very impressed with the
framework.
I have a question about best practice to solve a problem. I have a
component
(wicket panel) that contain contact information (like name, address,
email,
phone, etc) and on a specific web page I want to have two of the contact
panels. They of course access different model fields. Now to the
question:
The labels used for the contact fields are slightly different, so the
question is how to best solve this? Since the labels are not the same for
the two contact panels I cannot use a ResourceModel as it is because then
they would have the same label text. Is the best way to solve this with
inheritence or do you have any other solution?
Best Regards,
/Peter
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to send response without HTML code
See the request targets that set a http status code (cant remember the exact name) On 6/11/08, Milan Křápek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I have newbie question. I am working on application that must be able to process two type of request. The users requests (send them some html pages in response) and server requests that expect only HTTP/1.0 200 OK or something similar with different return code. In my application I translate the URL called by server to some WebPage class. This is wrong because WebPage needs some HTML code on the response. And I get this exception : WicketMessage: Markup of type 'html' for component 'eu.optimsys.plm.pages.recorder.CreateCallRecord' not found. At first I try to find some parent of WebPage that does not need any HTML code. But I was not successful. Please can you give me advice how to get access to HTTP response and request before it gets to objects from wicket.markup package. I need something like wicket.http.Request but I am not sure if something like this exists. Thanks for any advice Milan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to send response without HTML code
Hello, I have newbie question. I am working on application that must be able to process two type of request. The users requests (send them some html pages in response) and server requests that expect only HTTP/1.0 200 OK or something similar with different return code. In my application I translate the URL called by server to some WebPage class. This is wrong because WebPage needs some HTML code on the response. And I get this exception : WicketMessage: Markup of type 'html' for component 'eu.optimsys.plm.pages.recorder.CreateCallRecord' not found. At first I try to find some parent of WebPage that does not need any HTML code. But I was not successful. Please can you give me advice how to get access to HTTP response and request before it gets to objects from wicket.markup package. I need something like wicket.http.Request but I am not sure if something like this exists. Thanks for any advice Milan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ComponentPropertyModel
Hi,
CompoundPropertyModel does somewhat of the inverse of what I'm trying to
accomplish.
CompoundPropertyModel binds some model to an expression that is the id
of a component, while ComponentPropertyModel binds the model of the
component that it is used in to some expression. In the first case you
get to choose the model, in the second case you get to choose the
expression. But, alas, it does not work. Now I just use normal
PropertyModels. I could write some ComponentProperyModel as I think it
should work, but no time for that now, unfortunately... :S
As a side note. I don't like using the wicket id's as property
expressions. It places a tight coupling between a component's markup and
the component's model. This may be okay when the model is the component
itself, but not when the model's object is a domain object (which may
change at any time during development. not to speak of changing markup).
Regards,
Matthijs
Maurice Marrink wrote:
In all my years i have never used the ComponentPropertyModel. I always
use the CompoundPropertyModel.
public class MyPanel extends Panel {
public MyPanel(String id, IModel model) {
super(id, new CompoundPropertyModel(model));
add(new Label(name));
}
}
Maurice
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Matthijs Wensveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use ComponentPropertyModel as a replacement of PropertyModel
in some cases. The javadoc leads me to beleave I can do:
public class MyPanel extends Panel {
public MyPanel(String id, IModel model) {
super(id, model);
//add(new Label(label, new PropertyModel(model, name)));
add(new Label(label, new ComponentPropertyModel(name)));
}
}
..which would have the advantage that the model that is bound to the
component is taken when needed instead of a hard reference to the model
passed in as an argument to the constructor. This would allow the label to
still display the correct value even when myPanel.setModel(..) is called
after constructing MyPanel.
Unfortunately the ComponentPropertyModel always throws an
IllegalStateException because the 'wrapped model' should have been used. I
don't know what that means exactly, but the classes where
ComponentPropertyModel is used call :
super(id);
setModel(wrap(model));
I'm not very in to wrap music, but it seems ComponentPropertyModel is not
doing what I want. What is the intended usage of ComponentPropertyModel?
Of course, the workaround is to not call myPanel.setModel, but
myPanel.setModelObject, so the reference to the component's model is
preserved. That way PropertyModel can be safely used.
Thanks,
Matthijs
--
Matthijs Wensveen
Func. Internet Integration
W http://www.func.nl
T +31 20 423
F +31 20 4223500
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Matthijs Wensveen
Func. Internet Integration
W http://www.func.nl
T +31 20 423
F +31 20 4223500
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
enclosure around listview
Hi, Is there a way to hide a listview with an enclosure when there are no items to display? One way to get it working is to toggle the visibility of the listview based on wheter or not the list is empty or not. I was expecting this would work out-of-the-box though... Thanks, Matthijs -- Matthijs Wensveen Func. Internet Integration W http://www.func.nl T +31 20 423 F +31 20 4223500 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: forcing cookies to expire
Because we cant really just call set path... That is something that
you have to do. Why do you want it on root?
On 6/10/08, jchappelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply. I finally fixed the problem. What I found was
that when I was creating my cookie I was calling setPath(/) and when I
deleted it I was not calling setPath(/). So I guess the equals method saw
them as two different cookies and it wasn't deleting it. There is actually a
convenience method on the WebResponse class called clearCookie that I am
calling. However, that method will not work if you have called setPath(/)
on your cookie because it doesn't set the path. It just does the following:
public void clearCookie(final Cookie cookie)
{
if (httpServletResponse != null)
{
cookie.setMaxAge(0);
cookie.setValue(null);
addCookie(cookie);
}
}
Thanks,
Josh
richardwilko wrote:
Ive had the same problem. to delete a cookie do this:
Cookie newCookie = new Cookie(my cookie name here!, null);
newCookie.setMaxAge(0);
newCookie.setPath(/);
getWebRequestCycle().getWebResponse().addCookie(newCookie);
i dont know why (i didnt really look into it) but u seem to have to create
a new cookie with the same name and add it. maybe this is a wicket bug?
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/forcing-cookies-to-expire-tp17067292p17760587.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: enclosure around listview
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Matthijs Wensveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way to hide a listview with an enclosure when there are no items to display? One way to get it working is to toggle the visibility of the listview based on wheter or not the list is empty or not. I think that's the normal way, in that you'd typically have both the list and a No items found label, then set one or the other as visible... I was expecting this would work out-of-the-box though... JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET) covers Wishes as well as Bugs! :-) /Gwyn
Wasp/Swarm: change LoginContext in Session
Hi,
in our application the user's rights depend on the location (Munich,
Berlin,...).
There's a drop down choice, where the user can change the location, on which
he wants to work.
So, when he changes the location, also the principals (permissions) have to
be changed.
How can I remove the old principals and add new ones within the same session
?
Is it possible to remove the LoginContext from the session and add a new one
?
Thanks
Andrea
ApplLoginContext:
---
public class ApplLoginContext extends LoginContext
{
...
public final Subject login() throws LoginException
{
...
DefaultSubject subject = new DefaultSubject ();
...
// grant principals
subject.addPrincipal(new SimplePrincipal(TEST_ADMIN));
return subject;
}
}
Login.java:
--
public class Login extends AppBasePage
{
...
public class LoginForm extends Form
{
...
public void onSubmit()
{
...
// add principals of logged in user to the context
ApplLoginContext context = new ApplLoginContext(loggedInPerson);
try
{
((WaspSession)getSession()).login(context);
}
catch (LoginException e)
{
...
}
}
}
}
wicket url links
wicket 1.2 has component#forUrl(). what to use in 1.3? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to send response without HTML code
Thanks for response but this is not th exact thing I want. I need to know the name of wicket component, where can I get access to request from user and fill the response for him. All I need is some parent class of WebPage. But this object must return just http code without any HTML. (I was not able to send response from WebPage without having any addititonal HTML file ). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to send response without HTML code
Hi Milan, I think you should throw the exception AbortWithHttpStatusException. If you change your mind and want to set the HTTP status code, but provide content as well, then call something like ((WebResponse)getResponse).getHttpServletResponse().setStatus(HttpServletResponse.SC_...) in the constructor of your page. Regards, Erik. Milan Křápek schreef: Thanks for response but this is not th exact thing I want. I need to know the name of wicket component, where can I get access to request from user and fill the response for him. All I need is some parent class of WebPage. But this object must return just http code without any HTML. (I was not able to send response from WebPage without having any addititonal HTML file ). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stateless vs. stateful what exactly did I do ?
Hi,
I have built a page that is stateless (bookmarkable) that accepts
PageParameters.
Now, this page inherits from a page that accepts PageParameters AND another
parameter.
public final class UserBrowserPage extends EntityBrowserPage {
public UserBrowserPage(PageParameters pageParameters) {
super(pageParameters, Const.LOCALIZATION_USER_PREFIX, personId);
...
}
}
And:
public abstract class EntityBrowserPage extends StyledSecuredBasePage {
public EntityBrowserPage(PageParameters pageParameters, String
localizationPrefix,
String localizationPostfix) {
...
}
}
Now, the prefix and postfix are not used for class members.
They're used to create a Panel in the constructor and that's all.
To my understanding, the UserBrowserPage is stateless.
I even do in the Application a mounting: mount(new
QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy(/userBrowser, UserBrowserPage.class));
Which implies that it is stateless page.
Am I correct?
what happens if a sub class is a stateless page (has no parameters
constructor or only with PageParameters), but the parent page is stateful
(gets in the constructor parameters and stores them in class members)?
Hope I was clear :)
Thanks
--
Eyal Golan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74
change the mountpath of wicket request
currently all wicket request at mounted at root, e.g. /?wicket:interface can we change it to mount at different place like /customer/?wicket:interface -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/change-the-%22mountpath%22-of-wicket-request-tp17775860p17775860.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wasp/Swarm: change LoginContext in Session
Didn't we use custom actions for those locations?
A user could have global or location permissions, right?
In that case the permissions would be the same for each location. The
only difference would be in the fact that the user has or does not
have a location. which is checked by your securitychecks.
So i don't really see why you would require a new set of permissions.
However if you must :)
By default a logincontext blocks additional logins, but you can change
that (constructor flag), you can then login again using another
logincontext. Your user now has the combined permissions of both
logincontexts, which in your case is not what you want but you can do
a logoff of the first logincontext. As long as there is a logincontext
active the session won't be destroyed.
Maurice
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Andrea Jahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
in our application the user's rights depend on the location (Munich,
Berlin,...).
There's a drop down choice, where the user can change the location, on which
he wants to work.
So, when he changes the location, also the principals (permissions) have to
be changed.
How can I remove the old principals and add new ones within the same session
?
Is it possible to remove the LoginContext from the session and add a new one
?
Thanks
Andrea
ApplLoginContext:
---
public class ApplLoginContext extends LoginContext
{
...
public final Subject login() throws LoginException
{
...
DefaultSubject subject = new DefaultSubject ();
...
// grant principals
subject.addPrincipal(new SimplePrincipal(TEST_ADMIN));
return subject;
}
}
Login.java:
--
public class Login extends AppBasePage
{
...
public class LoginForm extends Form
{
...
public void onSubmit()
{
...
// add principals of logged in user to the context
ApplLoginContext context = new ApplLoginContext(loggedInPerson);
try
{
((WaspSession)getSession()).login(context);
}
catch (LoginException e)
{
...
}
}
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: beginner question about models when having more than one component of the same type on the same page
I will answer my own post, just in case somebody else is looking for a
solution to the same problem. I have found two ways to get the resource
loading to do exactly what I want (There are probably a lot more out there):
Solution 1 (The easiest one in my opinion):
Do the following changes to ContactPanel.html:
Replace the span wicket:id=nameLabel/span tag with wicket:message
key=nameLabel/wicket:message (and the same for userNameLabel,
phoneLabel and emailLabel).
It works straight away for the nameLabel in the hrContactPanel it picks up
the string HR Contact: from the VacancyPage.properties file and for the
nameLabel in hiringManagerPanel it picks up the string Hiring Manager:
instead, just as it should :-)
Solution 2:
Instead of using the ResourceModel you have to use the StringResourceModel
and supply the component and an empty model. Note that it does not work
unless you supply the component (this) to the ResourceModel. Here is the
updated ContactPanel.java:
public class ContactPanel extends Panel {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public ContactPanel(String id, IModel model) {
super(id, model);
add(new Label(nameLabel, new StringResourceModel(nameLabel,
this, null)));
add(new Label(name));
add(new Label(userNameLabel, new
StringResourceModel(userNameLabel, this, null)));
add(new Label(userName));
add(new Label(phoneLabel, new StringResourceModel(phoneLabel,
this, null)));
add(new Label(phone));
add(new Label(emailLabel, new StringResourceModel(emailLabel,
this, null)));
add(new Label(email));
}
}
Best Regards,
/Peter
2008/6/11 Peter Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
HTML for the panel ((ContactPanel.html):
html xmlns:wicket
wicket:panel
table
tr
tdspan wicket:id=nameLabel/span/td
tdspan wicket:id=name/span/td
/tr
tr
tdspan wicket:id=userNameLabel/span/td
tdspan wicket:id=userName/span/td
/tr
tr
tdspan wicket:id=phoneLabel/span/td
tdspan wicket:id=phone/span/td
/tr
tr
tdspan wicket:id=emailLabel/span/td
tdspan wicket:id=email/span/td
/tr
/table
/wicket:panel
/html
Java code for the panel (ContactPanel.java):
public class ContactPanel extends Panel {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public ContactPanel(String id, IModel model) {
super(id, model);
add(new Label(nameLabel, new ResourceModel(nameLabel)));
add(new Label(name));
add(new Label(userNameLabel, new
ResourceModel(userNameLabel)));
add(new Label(userName));
add(new Label(phoneLabel, new ResourceModel(phoneLabel)));
add(new Label(phone));
add(new Label(emailLabel, new ResourceModel(emailLabel)));
add(new Label(email));
}
}
HTML for the page using the panel (VacanyPage.html):
--- snip ---
table
tr
tdspan
wicket:id=hrContactPanel/span/td
/tr
tr
tdspan
wicket:id=hiringManagerPanel/span/td
/tr
/table
--- snip ---
Java code for the page (VacanyPage.java):
--- snip ---
Form form = new Form(vacancyForm, new
CompoundPropertyModel(vacancyReq)) {
--- snip ---
Contact hrContact = new Contact();
form.add(new ContactPanel(hrContactPanel, new
CompoundPropertyModel(hrContact)));
Contact hiringManager = new Contact();
form.add(new ContactPanel(hiringManagerPanel, new
CompoundPropertyModel(hiringManager)));
--- snip ---
Properties file for the page (VacancyPage.properties):
vacancyForm.hrContactPanel.nameLabel=HR Contact:
vacancyForm.hrContactPanel.userNameLabel=HR Contact Username:
vacancyForm.hrContactPanel.phoneLabel=Phone:
vacancyForm.hrContactPanel.emailLabel=Email:
vacancyForm.hiringManagerPanel.nameLabel=Hiring Manager:
vacancyForm.hiringManagerPanel.userNameLabel=Hiring Manager Username:
vacancyForm.hiringManagerPanel.phoneLabel=Phone:
vacancyForm.hiringManagerPanel.emailLabel=Email:
As you can see from the code the VacancyPage has two instances of
ContactPanel and these should have different labels. I have tried different
ways to specify this, but Wicket says it cannot find the labels, so I must
be doing something wrong.
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best Regards,
/Peter
2008/6/11 Martin Makundi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Can you paste the code for better insight into your problem?
2008/6/11 Peter Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I have just begun to use wicket and so far I am very impressed with the
framework.
I have a question about best practice to solve a problem. I have a
component
(wicket panel) that contain contact information (like name, address,
Re: How to send response without HTML code
I think this is what AbortWithWebErrorCodeException is for Am 11.06.2008 um 13:24 schrieb Erik van Oosten: Hi Milan, I think you should throw the exception AbortWithHttpStatusException. If you change your mind and want to set the HTTP status code, but provide content as well, then call something like ((WebResponse )getResponse ).getHttpServletResponse().setStatus(HttpServletResponse.SC_...) in the constructor of your page. Regards, Erik. Milan Křápek schreef: Thanks for response but this is not th exact thing I want. I need to know the name of wicket component, where can I get access to request from user and fill the response for him. All I need is some parent class of WebPage. But this object must return just http code without any HTML. (I was not able to send response from WebPage without having any addititonal HTML file ). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PageExpiredException when clicking an AjaxLink
Hi all,
I need a clue about a strange problem we're coming across in wicket 1.3.0-rc1.
(I know wicket has made a huge progress since then but our tight schedule dos
not allow any upgrade at the moment).
I have an AjaxLink which replaces the default onclick behavior of AjaxLink
with our own behavior.
When the user clicks the AjaxLink we prompt for some user input via JavaScript.
The user input is concatenated to the Ajax request URL as you can see in the
generated markup:
a href=# wicket:id=markAsHandled onclick=var handleMsg=prompt('Please enter a message','');if
(handleMsg!=null) {var
wcall=wicketAjaxGet('../../?wicket:interface=modal-dialog-pagemap:1:requestNote:requestNote.container:markAsHandled::IBehaviorListener:0:2'
+ 'handleMsg=' + handleMsg,null,null, function() {return Wicket.$$(this)}.bind(this));}return !wcall;
id=markAsHandled9Mark As Handled/a
However, sometimes the the Ajax request fails due to a PageExpiredException.
The WebRequestCycleProcessor fails to find the page in the page map and cannot
resolve the request.
This happens only occasionally which prevents me from proper debugging.
When I tried to raise debug level of wicket, I failed to reproduce the problem.
Can anyone provide me some clue where to start ?
Thanks
Nili
--
Best,
Nili
===
Nili Adoram
GRM Team, RD, Qlusters Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-3-6236636
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PageExpiredException when clicking an AjaxLink
Ok this may be a longshot but see if this makes sense. I had a similar problem, it was caused because i had some image links where the src attribute was actually pointing at the home page of my application. So instead of loading an image it would actually make a get request to the home page, which puts the home page into page map. If you have enough of these dodgy images then your current page gets pushed out of the page map, as it only holds a limited number of pages, so your ajax fails. What sort of session store are you using, the default (second level cache thing) or httpsession page map? Nili Adoram wrote: Hi all, I need a clue about a strange problem we're coming across in wicket 1.3.0-rc1. (I know wicket has made a huge progress since then but our tight schedule dos not allow any upgrade at the moment). I have an AjaxLink which replaces the default onclick behavior of AjaxLink with our own behavior. When the user clicks the AjaxLink we prompt for some user input via JavaScript. The user input is concatenated to the Ajax request URL as you can see in the generated markup: # Mark As Handled However, sometimes the the Ajax request fails due to a PageExpiredException. The WebRequestCycleProcessor fails to find the page in the page map and cannot resolve the request. This happens only occasionally which prevents me from proper debugging. When I tried to raise debug level of wicket, I failed to reproduce the problem. Can anyone provide me some clue where to start ? Thanks Nili -- Best, Nili === Nili Adoram GRM Team, RD, Qlusters Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-3-6236636 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/PageExpiredException-when-clicking-an-AjaxLink-tp17776613p1359.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
setRenderBodyOnly(true) - something more powerful?
Hi! I have had to tweak some markup. I have complex tables so my markup is as follows: table thead.../ tbody wicket:id=radioGroup1/ tbody wicket:id=radioGroup2/ div wicket:id=rowListView tr wicket:id=rowspanListView /// close tags ofcourse I would very much like to hide the excess div and tbody tags completely from the markup seen by the browser. However, if I set setRenderBodyOnly(true) for the specific components, the tags will be visible as div and tbody. Only the attributes are not rendered. Is there some way to hide completely the markup of the excess elements? Hurts validation. I cannot just set visibility to false because the elements are nested and I want the content to be visible :) ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: setRenderBodyOnly(true) - something more powerful?
Have you tried the wicket:container tag? On Jun 11, 2008, at 9:29 AM, Martin Makundi wrote: Hi! I have had to tweak some markup. I have complex tables so my markup is as follows: table thead.../ tbody wicket:id=radioGroup1/ tbody wicket:id=radioGroup2/ div wicket:id=rowListView tr wicket:id=rowspanListView /// close tags ofcourse I would very much like to hide the excess div and tbody tags completely from the markup seen by the browser. However, if I set setRenderBodyOnly(true) for the specific components, the tags will be visible as div and tbody. Only the attributes are not rendered. Is there some way to hide completely the markup of the excess elements? Hurts validation. I cannot just set visibility to false because the elements are nested and I want the content to be visible :) ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: stateless vs. stateful what exactly did I do ?
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-06-2008/jw-06-wicket1.html?page=1
On 6/11/08, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have built a page that is stateless (bookmarkable) that accepts
PageParameters.
Now, this page inherits from a page that accepts PageParameters AND another
parameter.
public final class UserBrowserPage extends EntityBrowserPage {
public UserBrowserPage(PageParameters pageParameters) {
super(pageParameters, Const.LOCALIZATION_USER_PREFIX, personId);
...
}
}
And:
public abstract class EntityBrowserPage extends StyledSecuredBasePage {
public EntityBrowserPage(PageParameters pageParameters, String
localizationPrefix,
String localizationPostfix) {
...
}
}
Now, the prefix and postfix are not used for class members.
They're used to create a Panel in the constructor and that's all.
To my understanding, the UserBrowserPage is stateless.
I even do in the Application a mounting: mount(new
QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy(/userBrowser, UserBrowserPage.class));
Which implies that it is stateless page.
Am I correct?
what happens if a sub class is a stateless page (has no parameters
constructor or only with PageParameters), but the parent page is stateful
(gets in the constructor parameters and stores them in class members)?
Hope I was clear :)
Thanks
--
Eyal Golan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74
--
Aladejebi Ayodeji A.,
DabarObjects Solutions
Phone: +234 9 481 7 156
Mobile: +234 803 589 1780
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: www.dabarobjects.com
Blog: blog.dabarobjects.com
Re: 1.3.4 release
Hi, The 1.3.4 release has been delayed a couple of times for various reasons. Right now the state is that I need to find the time to look into an issue that could mean regression from 1.3.3[0]. I just haven't got the time for it yet. Frank [0]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1646 On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I know I have asked this question couple of times now, but is there a fixed release date on this yet? sorry if it sounds like a duplicate question; but we are being pushed to raise the concern over and over; Using a 1.3-SNAPSHOT is not really a great idea, because if something changes at wicket end which breaks our stuff it would end up being a bug on our plate from users here ... Hopefully someone can give a definitive schedule for release date. The original question was raised like a month back and the response was that it will be sometime that week itself. apparently each time the response has been the same. My question is: 1.) Is it delayed? 2.) Is it canceled? 3.) Is it being replaced by 1.4? (in that there will be *NO* 1.3.4 anymore) My apologies if i sound obstinate. Thnx, Rick.
Re: Z-depth problem with AutoCompleteTextField in IE
Michael Mehrle michael.mehrle at ask.com writes: In Internet Explorer I am experiencing a strange z-depth problem. Meaning that the drop down menu appears *behind* neighboring form fields - please take a look at this screenshot: Perhaps the same as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1355 ? Regards, Ismael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wasp/Swarm: change LoginContext in Session
Yes, I have different permissions for the locations. The user can have
different
roles for each location and each role has different permissions.
Now I made a dummy LoginContext class and for changing the LoginContext
I first add the dummy LoginContext, then delete the old LoginContext,
then add the new LoginContext and after that I delete the dummy
LoginContext.
This works, thank you
I think I could add the DummyLoginContext, when the user is logging in.
When the user is changing the location selection, I only would have to
logoff for the
old ApplLoginContext and login again for the new ApplLoginContext.
Andrea
// dummy
DummyLoginContext context2 = new DummyLoginContext(loggedInPerson);
((WaspSession)session).login(context2);
// destroy the old context
((WaspSession)session).logoff(new ApplLoginContext());
// add new context to session
ApplLoginContext context = new ApplLoginContext(loggedInPerson);
((WaspSession)session).login(context);
// destroy the dummy context
((WaspSession)session).logoff(new DummyLoginContext());
---
2008/6/11, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Didn't we use custom actions for those locations?
A user could have global or location permissions, right?
In that case the permissions would be the same for each location. The
only difference would be in the fact that the user has or does not
have a location. which is checked by your securitychecks.
So i don't really see why you would require a new set of permissions.
However if you must :)
By default a logincontext blocks additional logins, but you can change
that (constructor flag), you can then login again using another
logincontext. Your user now has the combined permissions of both
logincontexts, which in your case is not what you want but you can do
a logoff of the first logincontext. As long as there is a logincontext
active the session won't be destroyed.
Maurice
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Andrea Jahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
in our application the user's rights depend on the location (Munich,
Berlin,...).
There's a drop down choice, where the user can change the location, on
which
he wants to work.
So, when he changes the location, also the principals (permissions) have
to
be changed.
How can I remove the old principals and add new ones within the same
session
?
Is it possible to remove the LoginContext from the session and add a new
one
?
Thanks
Andrea
ApplLoginContext:
---
public class ApplLoginContext extends LoginContext
{
...
public final Subject login() throws LoginException
{
...
DefaultSubject subject = new DefaultSubject ();
...
// grant principals
subject.addPrincipal(new SimplePrincipal(TEST_ADMIN));
return subject;
}
}
Login.java:
--
public class Login extends AppBasePage
{
...
public class LoginForm extends Form
{
...
public void onSubmit()
{
...
// add principals of logged in user to the context
ApplLoginContext context = new ApplLoginContext(loggedInPerson);
try
{
((WaspSession)getSession()).login(context);
}
catch (LoginException e)
{
...
}
}
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: setRenderBodyOnly(true) - something more powerful?
Tnx! Good point: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wickets-xhtml-tags.html I think this page should be strongly cross-referenced from markup inheritance tutorial ;) There's a lot of useful stuff! ** Martin 2008/6/11 Alex Jacoby [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Have you tried the wicket:container tag? On Jun 11, 2008, at 9:29 AM, Martin Makundi wrote: Hi! I have had to tweak some markup. I have complex tables so my markup is as follows: table thead.../ tbody wicket:id=radioGroup1/ tbody wicket:id=radioGroup2/ div wicket:id=rowListView tr wicket:id=rowspanListView /// close tags ofcourse I would very much like to hide the excess div and tbody tags completely from the markup seen by the browser. However, if I set setRenderBodyOnly(true) for the specific components, the tags will be visible as div and tbody. Only the attributes are not rendered. Is there some way to hide completely the markup of the excess elements? Hurts validation. I cannot just set visibility to false because the elements are nested and I want the content to be visible :) ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: setRenderBodyOnly(true) - something more powerful?
it is a wiki -igor On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:00 AM, Martin Makundi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tnx! Good point: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wickets-xhtml-tags.html I think this page should be strongly cross-referenced from markup inheritance tutorial ;) There's a lot of useful stuff! ** Martin 2008/6/11 Alex Jacoby [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Have you tried the wicket:container tag? On Jun 11, 2008, at 9:29 AM, Martin Makundi wrote: Hi! I have had to tweak some markup. I have complex tables so my markup is as follows: table thead.../ tbody wicket:id=radioGroup1/ tbody wicket:id=radioGroup2/ div wicket:id=rowListView tr wicket:id=rowspanListView /// close tags ofcourse I would very much like to hide the excess div and tbody tags completely from the markup seen by the browser. However, if I set setRenderBodyOnly(true) for the specific components, the tags will be visible as div and tbody. Only the attributes are not rendered. Is there some way to hide completely the markup of the excess elements? Hurts validation. I cannot just set visibility to false because the elements are nested and I want the content to be visible :) ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anchors in Wicket?
Mind sharing that? ;-) -Original Message- From: Thijs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:23 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Anchors in Wicket? The component is any wicket component in the same page or next page if you know that component. What you are doing, an anchor in a different page, I've solved by writing my own subclass of link where I append the '#rsvp' myself. Michael Mehrle schreef: I don't get it - what is the 'component' in the setAnchor() method? If I set an anchor in a completely different page like this: a href=#rsvp / What do I set as the 'component' in the link's setAnchor? Thanks, Michael -Original Message- From: Thijs Vonk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:39 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Anchors in Wicket? Michael Mehrle wrote: How do create a link that jumps to some anchor in a page? Is there a way to define this in Wicket or do I have to do this manually somehow? Michael yes. use link.setAnchor(Component) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: forcing cookies to expire
I don't have to have it set on root. In fact now my code doesn't call setPath
at all and it works fine.
This is actually my first time ever using cookies. I've developed
traditional applications in the past. I really only need the cookie to be
visible to my login page but it doesn't really hurt if it is visible to any
other pages because this is the only place(as of now) that we use cookies in
our product.
How would I specify the path so that only my login page would be visible?
Since this is wicket and the URL paths are weird I don't really know how I
would do that.
Thanks,
Josh
Johan Compagner wrote:
Because we cant really just call set path... That is something that
you have to do. Why do you want it on root?
On 6/10/08, jchappelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply. I finally fixed the problem. What I found was
that when I was creating my cookie I was calling setPath(/) and when I
deleted it I was not calling setPath(/). So I guess the equals method
saw
them as two different cookies and it wasn't deleting it. There is
actually a
convenience method on the WebResponse class called clearCookie that I am
calling. However, that method will not work if you have called
setPath(/)
on your cookie because it doesn't set the path. It just does the
following:
public void clearCookie(final Cookie cookie)
{
if (httpServletResponse != null)
{
cookie.setMaxAge(0);
cookie.setValue(null);
addCookie(cookie);
}
}
Thanks,
Josh
richardwilko wrote:
Ive had the same problem. to delete a cookie do this:
Cookie newCookie = new Cookie(my cookie name here!, null);
newCookie.setMaxAge(0);
newCookie.setPath(/);
getWebRequestCycle().getWebResponse().addCookie(newCookie);
i dont know why (i didnt really look into it) but u seem to have to
create
a new cookie with the same name and add it. maybe this is a wicket bug?
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/forcing-cookies-to-expire-tp17067292p17760587.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/forcing-cookies-to-expire-tp17067292p17780251.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: enclosure around listview
Gwyn Evans wrote: On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Matthijs Wensveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way to hide a listview with an enclosure when there are no items to display? One way to get it working is to toggle the visibility of the listview based on wheter or not the list is empty or not. I think that's the normal way, in that you'd typically have both the list and a No items found label, then set one or the other as visible... I was expecting this would work out-of-the-box though... JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET) covers Wishes as well as Bugs! :-) /Gwyn I wish I knew what to wish for exactly... :D Thanks, Matthijs -- Matthijs Wensveen Func. Internet Integration W http://www.func.nl T +31 20 423 F +31 20 4223500 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: wicket url links
no answer? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: wicket url links Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:59:22 + wicket 1.2 has component#forUrl(). what to use in 1.3? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: wicket url links
Hmm... some (all) of us have jobs to do as well as this... Anyway, is component#urlFor() what you're looking for? What 1.2 version were you using, as 1.2.6 has the above but no component#forUrl()? /Gwyn On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:34 PM, i ii [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no answer? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: wicket url links Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:59:22 + wicket 1.2 has component#forUrl(). what to use in 1.3? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: wicket url links
sorry for job, thank you for help. i use 1.3, but cannot find component#urlFor(). i only see in 1.2 javadoc Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:04:11 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: wicket url links Hmm... some (all) of us have jobs to do as well as this... Anyway, is component#urlFor() what you're looking for? What 1.2 version were you using, as 1.2.6 has the above but no component#forUrl()? /Gwyn On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:34 PM, i ii wrote: no answer? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: wicket url links Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:59:22 + wicket 1.2 has component#forUrl(). what to use in 1.3? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: setRenderBodyOnly(true) - something more powerful?
Done :) 2008/6/11 Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]: it is a wiki -igor On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:00 AM, Martin Makundi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tnx! Good point: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wickets-xhtml-tags.html I think this page should be strongly cross-referenced from markup inheritance tutorial ;) There's a lot of useful stuff! ** Martin 2008/6/11 Alex Jacoby [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Have you tried the wicket:container tag? On Jun 11, 2008, at 9:29 AM, Martin Makundi wrote: Hi! I have had to tweak some markup. I have complex tables so my markup is as follows: table thead.../ tbody wicket:id=radioGroup1/ tbody wicket:id=radioGroup2/ div wicket:id=rowListView tr wicket:id=rowspanListView /// close tags ofcourse I would very much like to hide the excess div and tbody tags completely from the markup seen by the browser. However, if I set setRenderBodyOnly(true) for the specific components, the tags will be visible as div and tbody. Only the attributes are not rendered. Is there some way to hide completely the markup of the excess elements? Hurts validation. I cannot just set visibility to false because the elements are nested and I want the content to be visible :) ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: wicket url links
wicket 1.2 has component#forUrl(). what to use in 1.3? urlFor(Component) (can also be found on RequestCycle). Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: A question about cookie value loading
Hrm. This issue may well be what I've run up against. When exactly are ListView children created (or reused)? On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, nate roe wrote: Don't forget that I'm using 1.2... this has maybe changed and that's why Eclipse isn't showing the call hierarchy? Before 1.3.0-beta3 there was trouble visiting repeater children before they are rendered, could your problem be caused by that? http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-627 Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dropdownchoice without default option choose one
I would like to remove the default choose one option from the DropDownChoice component. Does anyone know how to do this. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Dropdownchoice-without-default-option-%22choose-one%22-tp17782776p17782776.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: wicket url links
thank you Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:49:01 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: wicket url links wicket 1.2 has component#forUrl(). what to use in 1.3? urlFor(Component) (can also be found on RequestCycle). Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dropdownchoice without default option choose one
Hi nitinkc, Calling setNullValid (false) on the drop down choice should get rid of the default choose one text. If the ddc model should always have a value defined then you could set the model object to be for example the first choice. e.g. ddc.setModelObject (ddc.getChoices().get(0)); Regards, Mike I would like to remove the default choose one option from the DropDownChoice component. Does anyone know how to do this. Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FileUploadField and AjaxButton
Hi,
I'm trying to use an AjaxButton along with a FileUploadField, and that produces
an unfortunate but predictable result. Whenever I call
_fileUploadField.getFileUpload() it returns null. If I try to replace the
button with a regular one it works just fine. Am I missing something obvious
here, or is it an issue?
This is in a function called by the onSubmit() in both cases:
FileUpload upload = _fileUploadField.getFileUpload();
if( upload != null )
{
// some code
} else
{
log.error();
}
I always get to the error bit here. I've solved the issue another place by
simply using a regular button. However that isn't really an option for me at
this location. I'd appreciate it if anyone could explain why this acts as it
does, or even better have a solution for me :)
Alex
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dropdownchoice without default option choose one
I tried setNullValid(false). But this does not get rid of the choose one option. Note that the choices are a list of Strings. If the choices are a list of other user defined object types and I use a choicerendrer for display values, the choose one option is removed(without setNullValid(false)). Any ideas? Michael O'Cleirigh wrote: Hi nitinkc, Calling setNullValid (false) on the drop down choice should get rid of the default choose one text. If the ddc model should always have a value defined then you could set the model object to be for example the first choice. e.g. ddc.setModelObject (ddc.getChoices().get(0)); Regards, Mike I would like to remove the default choose one option from the DropDownChoice component. Does anyone know how to do this. Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Dropdownchoice-without-default-option-%22choose-one%22-tp17782776p17783862.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to update parent component from a panel?
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, freak182 wrote:
I already rip out your patch and run the testcase it worked but how can i
implement/intgerate to my project...do you have a working example project
for that?
Unfortunately not, but just copy the classes to a suitable
package in your project and start using them in the same way
as in the test cases.
E.g. something along these lines
public class FooSelectionEvent implements Event {
private final IModel foo;
private final AjaxRequestTarget target;
public FooSelectionEvent(IModel foo, AjaxRequestTarget target) {
this.foo = foo;
this.target = target;
}
public Foo getFoo() {
return (Foo) foo.getObject();
}
public void addToTarget(Component c) {
target.addComponent(c);
}
}
public interface FooSelectionReceiver extends EventReceiver {
void onEvent(FooSelectionEvent event);
}
public class SelectedFooLabel extends Label implements FooSelectionReceiver {
...
public void onEvent(FooSelectionEvent event) {
setModelObject(event.getFoo());
event.addToTarget(this);
}
}
public class FooPanel extends Panel {
private EventBroadcaster broadcaster = new EventBroadcaster(this);
...
add(new DropDownChoice(fooSelection, fooSelection, fooList)
.add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange) {
public void onEvent(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
broadcaster.broadcast(FooSelectionReceiver.class, new
FooSelectionEvent(target, fooSelection));
}
});
...
}
Now SelectedFooLabel receives the events sent from the
DropDownChoice, provided that both component instances are on
the same page (you must be careful with repeater items and
other replaced components here).
Best wishes,
Timo
--
Timo Rantalaiho
Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dropdownchoice without default option choose one
I have noticed that with DropDownChoice, if the currently selected value is Null, you get this choose one item. And sometimes in a dynamic situation you get it still. Try using the analogous ListChoice element, at least it worked for me. ** Martin 2008/6/11 nitinkc [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I tried setNullValid(false). But this does not get rid of the choose one option. Note that the choices are a list of Strings. If the choices are a list of other user defined object types and I use a choicerendrer for display values, the choose one option is removed(without setNullValid(false)). Any ideas? Michael O'Cleirigh wrote: Hi nitinkc, Calling setNullValid (false) on the drop down choice should get rid of the default choose one text. If the ddc model should always have a value defined then you could set the model object to be for example the first choice. e.g. ddc.setModelObject (ddc.getChoices().get(0)); Regards, Mike I would like to remove the default choose one option from the DropDownChoice component. Does anyone know how to do this. Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Dropdownchoice-without-default-option-%22choose-one%22-tp17782776p17783862.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: A question about cookie value loading
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, nate roe wrote: When exactly are ListView children created (or reused)? Use the source, Luke! onBeforeRender AFAIK. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FileUploadField and AjaxButton
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Alexander Landsnes Keül wrote: produces an unfortunate but predictable result. Whenever I call _fileUploadField.getFileUpload() it returns null. If I try to replace the button with a regular one it works just fine. Am I missing something obvious here, or is it an issue? I think that it is an obvious issue :) * FILE UPLOADS ARE NOT SUPPORTED BY AJAX. USE GOOGLE TO LEARN MORE * ABOUT THIS. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/upload/FileUploadField.java It's a great idea to attach Wicket source code to Wicket jars in your IDE, then you can easily surf to Wicket code which tends to explain itself well, see the javadocs etc. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dropdownchoice without default option choose one
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Martin Makundi wrote: I have noticed that with DropDownChoice, if the currently selected value is Null, you get this choose one item. And sometimes in a dynamic situation you get it still. Yeah, it's easy to miss setting the currently selected value for when DropDownChoice is rendered for the first time. Hence it's always a good idea to supply it in the constructor. It can get tricky if you want to have the default choice in the UI, but not necessarily update it to the domain object property that the selection is bound to. If this is required, you can get around it by a custom model. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ListViews in a form question
Hi! I have nested listviews which draw a complex tabular form having variable colspans and rowspans depending on the state of the form. I have an Add button to add elements into one of the inner listviews. Problem: 1. If I have setReuseItems true, the HTML table is not rendered properly (somehow the old table structure remains which should be restructured). 2. If I have setReuseItems false, the form components loose their state (unsubmitted entries) whenever I press the button. So. In my understanding, I need to both a) redraw the html table (at least update the colspan and rowspan attributes) and still b) preserve the form component state :) Is there an out-of-the-box solution for this? ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Example of wicketstuff-minis' Veil
Igor, Any updates on this?? thanks! nitinkc wrote: Here is the stack trace: Root cause:java.lang.IllegalStateException: This behavior is already bound to component. An instance of this behavior cannot be reused between components. Bound component: [MarkupContainer [Component id = test, page = No Page, path = test.Button]] at org.wicketstuff.minis.veil.Veil.bind(Veil.java:64) at org.apache.wicket.Component.add(Component.java:922) at com.uprr.app.hrw.wicket.page.scheduling.EventDetailsPage.init(EventDetailsPage.java:235) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:494) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:350) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:303) at org.apache.wicket.session.DefaultPageFactory.newPage(DefaultPageFactory.java:58) at org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.newPage(BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.java:262) at org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.getPage(BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.java:283) at org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.processEvents(BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.java:210) at org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.processEvents(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:90) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:1166) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1241) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1316) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:493) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:354) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:194) at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:42) at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run(WebAppServletContext.java:3393) at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321) at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(Unknown Source) at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(WebAppServletContext.java:2140) at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.execute(WebAppServletContext.java:2046) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.run(ServletRequestImpl.java:1366) at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:200) at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172) I am using: wicketstuff-minis-1.3.0-SNAPSHOT.jar igor.vaynberg wrote: can you paste the stack trace please? are you using latest trunk? -igor On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 6:38 AM, nitinkc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need an example of wicketstuff-minis' veil behavior. I added this to one of my components but keep getting the error that the behavior is already bound to another component and cannot be reused. All I am doing is: Button button = new Button(test); button.add(new Veil()); form.add(button); This is the only Veil I am using on my page. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Example-of-wicketstuff-minis%27-Veil-tp17623741p17623741.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Example-of-wicketstuff-minis%27-Veil-tp17623741p17784653.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dropdownchoice without default option choose one
Yeah, it's easy to miss setting the currently selected value for when DropDownChoice is rendered for the first time. Hence it's always a good idea to supply it in the constructor. I have noticed the problem when I have a propertymodel attached to the dropdown, and I have two chained dropdowns ... I haven't studied it much, could fairly well be a stupid user bug. ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dropdownchoice without default option choose one
Hi nitinkc,
The Choose One option is actually defined in:
public abstract class AbstractSingleSelectChoice extends AbstractChoice
{
/**
*
*/
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
/** String to display when the selected value is null and nullValid
is false. */
private static final String CHOOSE_ONE = Choose One;
.
.
.
You should look at overriding this method:
protected CharSequence getDefaultChoice(final Object selected) in
AbstractSingleSelectionChoice
It looks to me like if you return EMPTY_STRING then no default choice
will be rendered into the options list.
Mike
I tried setNullValid(false). But this does not get rid of the choose one
option. Note that the choices are a list of Strings. If the choices are a
list of other user defined object types and I use a choicerendrer for
display values, the choose one option is removed(without
setNullValid(false)). Any ideas?
Michael O'Cleirigh wrote:
Hi nitinkc,
Calling setNullValid (false) on the drop down choice should get rid of
the default choose one text.
If the ddc model should always have a value defined then you could set
the model object to be for example the first choice.
e.g. ddc.setModelObject (ddc.getChoices().get(0));
Regards,
Mike
I would like to remove the default choose one option from the
DropDownChoice component.
Does anyone know how to do this. Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dropdownchoice without default option choose one
If you use ListChoice this option is not there. ListChoice does not
extend AbstractSingleSelectChoice .
**
Martin
2008/6/11 Michael O'Cleirigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi nitinkc,
The Choose One option is actually defined in:
public abstract class AbstractSingleSelectChoice extends AbstractChoice
{
/**
*
*/
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
/** String to display when the selected value is null and nullValid is
false. */
private static final String CHOOSE_ONE = Choose One;
.
.
.
You should look at overriding this method:
protected CharSequence getDefaultChoice(final Object selected) in
AbstractSingleSelectionChoice
It looks to me like if you return EMPTY_STRING then no default choice will
be rendered into the options list.
Mike
I tried setNullValid(false). But this does not get rid of the choose one
option. Note that the choices are a list of Strings. If the choices are a
list of other user defined object types and I use a choicerendrer for
display values, the choose one option is removed(without
setNullValid(false)). Any ideas?
Michael O'Cleirigh wrote:
Hi nitinkc,
Calling setNullValid (false) on the drop down choice should get rid of
the default choose one text.
If the ddc model should always have a value defined then you could set
the model object to be for example the first choice.
e.g. ddc.setModelObject (ddc.getChoices().get(0));
Regards,
Mike
I would like to remove the default choose one option from the
DropDownChoice component.
Does anyone know how to do this. Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to get context path
Hi, my images in the application are in webapp/image folder. How to get Context Path in wicket so I can prepend this path to display the image. I am looking for something like this. getContextPath() + image/icon.gif; Please suggest how to do that. Thanks, Sanjay. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to get context path
see ContextImage -igor On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Patel, Sanjay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, my images in the application are in webapp/image folder. How to get Context Path in wicket so I can prepend this path to display the image. I am looking for something like this. getContextPath() + image/icon.gif; Please suggest how to do that. Thanks, Sanjay. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
when to save shopping basket for registered and anonymous users?
Hi! We are developing a shopping basket in our Wicket application. We would like to persist the basket as late as possible, and for anonymous users only if they sign up to the service. We don't want to save lots of anonymous Baskets to the database. We use Wicket 1.3.3 and Databinder (as a Hibernate bridge). What would be a good save point for the Basket-object? One potential solution is this: Override Session.detach() and save Basket there, if user is registered and Basket is dirty.. If user is anonymous, save when user has signed up and the User -domain object is created. Possibly in the next version: For anonymous users, create a cookiebased solution Amazon-style. Any glaring holes in our solution? Other ways of fulfilling this need? br, Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ListViews in a form question
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Martin Makundi wrote: I have nested listviews which draw a complex tabular form having variable colspans and rowspans depending on the state of the form. For some reason, I have often succeeded better with other repeaters than ListView (e.g. RefreshingView, DataView) in complex situations. 1. If I have setReuseItems true, the HTML table is not rendered properly (somehow the old table structure remains which should be restructured). If the old Items are left there, the old structure remains, so this seems to make sense. 2. If I have setReuseItems false, the form components loose their state (unsubmitted entries) whenever I press the button. Yeah I think that this is what it always does; new Items don't have any idea of the input fed to the old Items (except if they share the same model, and the data was updated all the way to the model). So. In my understanding, I need to both a) redraw the html table (at least update the colspan and rowspan attributes) and still b) preserve the form component state :) Is there an out-of-the-box solution for this? If you repaint the component via ajax, with HTML that comes from the server, you must have sent the data to the server with a suitable ajax behavior so that it can be in the ajax reponse. I think that in a normal submit the same applies -- you have to store all the data (in models for example) to the server so that you can display it again when the page is refreshed. When conversion or validation errors occur, Wicket returns the original raw input to form components, but also in that case the data made the trip to the server and back. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: when to save shopping basket for registered and anonymous users?
Hi! Why do you want to save the basket at a specific technical occurrence such as .detach? If you want, you can always persist changes for a registered user and on the other hand never persist them for anonymous users. Whenever the anonymous user becomes registered - the basket is persisted. ** Martin 2008/6/11 Marcus Mattila [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! We are developing a shopping basket in our Wicket application. We would like to persist the basket as late as possible, and for anonymous users only if they sign up to the service. We don't want to save lots of anonymous Baskets to the database. We use Wicket 1.3.3 and Databinder (as a Hibernate bridge). What would be a good save point for the Basket-object? One potential solution is this: Override Session.detach() and save Basket there, if user is registered and Basket is dirty.. If user is anonymous, save when user has signed up and the User -domain object is created. Possibly in the next version: For anonymous users, create a cookiebased solution Amazon-style. Any glaring holes in our solution? Other ways of fulfilling this need? br, Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dropdownchoice without default option choose one
Just to summarise, you need to do two things: set a 'current selection' and call setNullValid(false). /Gwyn On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:14 PM, nitinkc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to remove the default choose one option from the DropDownChoice component. Does anyone know how to do this. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Dropdownchoice-without-default-option-%22choose-one%22-tp17782776p17782776.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat 5.5.9 isn't running Quickstart
I downloaded Tomcat 6 this morning, and the QuickStart project runs in it without the logging conflict I had with Tomcat 5.5.9. Perhaps a newer release of Tomcat 5.5 would also work, but I'll just go to Tomcat 6. However, I have a couple of follow-up questions: (*) My old Wicket 1.2 application, which ran in Tomcat 5.5.9, doesn't run in Tomcat 6! My guess is that Tomcat 6 removed the logging .jar that was interfering with the logging classes deployed with Wicket 1.3 applications, but now my Wicket 1.2 application on Tomcat 6 is lacking a logging implementation. Though I plan to upgrade all my Wicket 1.2 applications to Wicket 1.3, is there a recommended .jar I should add to the lib directory of my Wicket 1.2 application so it runs in Tomcat 6? (My Wicket 1.3 QuickStart adds log4j-1.2.14.jar, slf4j-api-1.4.2.jar, and slf4j-log4j12-1.4.2.jar to the application's lib directory; my Wicket 1.2 application does not add these.) (*) I really like the idea of debugging in Eclipse using in-process Jetty, even if I do deploy to Tomcat. Thanks to posts I found in the archive of this mailing list, I was able to modify the QuickStart configuration of Jetty to read the J2EE and Jetty configuration .xml files that configure my data source. However, I have another problem. My application uses images much as does in Wicket's images example. I have some image files (e.g. image1.png) stored directly inside the webapp folder, and my application references the images by generating HTML like so: html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xmlns:wicket=http://wicket.sourceforge.net/; xml:lang=en lang=en head/ body img wicket:id=picture src=image1.png alt=Picture/ /body /html The image appears when I run the application in Tomcat, but not when I run it in Eclipse with Jetty (following the process described in http://herebebeasties.com/2007-10-07/wicket-quickstart/). What do I need to change to the QuickStart's Jetty configuration so that this HTML will be able to access the image? -Original Message- From: Frank Silbermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 3:08 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.9 isn't running Quickstart I did a Windows search for files with names containing log4j and came up with nothing. I wonder whether it could be bundled into other Tomcat jars. I'm using Tomcat 5.5.9, so maybe I should try a fresh install of Tomcat, version 6, when I get back on Wednesday. -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 2:57 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.9 isn't running Quickstart it doesnt sound right. tomcat itself is writing out logs and i dont think it uses jdk logging. so there must be at least a log4j jar somewhere in tomcat install.. we have deployed in 5.5 and 6.0 previously and everything works fine. -igor On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Frank Silbermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The lib directory in the QuickStart's WEB-INF contains: log4j-1.2.14.jar slf4j-api-1.4.2.jar slf4j-log4j12-1.4.2.jar -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 11:27 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.9 isn't running Quickstart you have to at least also have log4j in there somewhere. commons-logging is just the pipeline.. -igor On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Frank Silbermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, aside from the logging-oriented jars that maven packs into the QuickStart's lib folder, the only logging jar I can see in Tomcat is in Tomcat's bin folder, named commons-logging-api.jar dated 3/26/2005. Do I need to replace that with a more recent version? Would you recommend moving to the current version of Tomcat to avoid side-effects? -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 11:07 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.9 isn't running Quickstart well, there you go, something funky with your logger jars -igor On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Frank Silbermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, yes, I thought I had checked those, but I must have missed the right log. The error messages are: The catalina.log file contains: INFO: Stopping service Catalina Jun 6, 2008 10:58:23 AM org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader findResourceInternal INFO: Illegal access: this web application instance has been stopped already. Could not load commons-logging.properties. The eventual following stack trace is caused by an error thrown for debugging purposes as well as to attempt to terminate the thread which caused the illegal access, and has no functional impact. Jun 6, 2008 10:58:23 AM org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader findResourceInternal INFO: Illegal access: this web application instance has been stopped already. Could not
Re: ListViews in a form question
For some reason, I have often succeeded better with other repeaters than ListView (e.g. RefreshingView, DataView) in complex situations. I have postponed studying these, I suspect problems with varying column counts on rows. I think that in a normal submit the same applies -- you have to store all the data (in models for example) to the server so that you can display it again when the page is refreshed. One solution could probably be to require the form to pass validation when these buttons are pressed. But the intuitivity of this solution is not perfect ;) ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multiple Layouts using Inheritance
In Wicket is it possible to inherit from multiple layouts? What we are trying to do is introduce different skins for the same application (We could control all of this in CSS and forget about it, but want to try this first) Each skin is a different Layout Page/Class in Wicket, how can we switch the inheriting Page/Class's layout. For instance: Class Skin1 extends WebPage Class Skin2 extends WebPage abstract BasePage() - Don't know how to design this one yet! MyPage extends BasePage and MyPage should use either Skin1 or Skin2 based on some criteria inside of BasePage. Is this even doable ? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Layouts-using-Inheritance-tp17786400p17786400.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wasp/Swarm: change LoginContext in Session
Why the dummy? it should work with 2 contexts just as well.
Maurice
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Andrea Jahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I have different permissions for the locations. The user can have
different
roles for each location and each role has different permissions.
Now I made a dummy LoginContext class and for changing the LoginContext
I first add the dummy LoginContext, then delete the old LoginContext,
then add the new LoginContext and after that I delete the dummy
LoginContext.
This works, thank you
I think I could add the DummyLoginContext, when the user is logging in.
When the user is changing the location selection, I only would have to
logoff for the
old ApplLoginContext and login again for the new ApplLoginContext.
Andrea
// dummy
DummyLoginContext context2 = new DummyLoginContext(loggedInPerson);
((WaspSession)session).login(context2);
// destroy the old context
((WaspSession)session).logoff(new ApplLoginContext());
// add new context to session
ApplLoginContext context = new ApplLoginContext(loggedInPerson);
((WaspSession)session).login(context);
// destroy the dummy context
((WaspSession)session).logoff(new DummyLoginContext());
---
2008/6/11, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Didn't we use custom actions for those locations?
A user could have global or location permissions, right?
In that case the permissions would be the same for each location. The
only difference would be in the fact that the user has or does not
have a location. which is checked by your securitychecks.
So i don't really see why you would require a new set of permissions.
However if you must :)
By default a logincontext blocks additional logins, but you can change
that (constructor flag), you can then login again using another
logincontext. Your user now has the combined permissions of both
logincontexts, which in your case is not what you want but you can do
a logoff of the first logincontext. As long as there is a logincontext
active the session won't be destroyed.
Maurice
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Andrea Jahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
in our application the user's rights depend on the location (Munich,
Berlin,...).
There's a drop down choice, where the user can change the location, on
which
he wants to work.
So, when he changes the location, also the principals (permissions) have
to
be changed.
How can I remove the old principals and add new ones within the same
session
?
Is it possible to remove the LoginContext from the session and add a new
one
?
Thanks
Andrea
ApplLoginContext:
---
public class ApplLoginContext extends LoginContext
{
...
public final Subject login() throws LoginException
{
...
DefaultSubject subject = new DefaultSubject ();
...
// grant principals
subject.addPrincipal(new SimplePrincipal(TEST_ADMIN));
return subject;
}
}
Login.java:
--
public class Login extends AppBasePage
{
...
public class LoginForm extends Form
{
...
public void onSubmit()
{
...
// add principals of logged in user to the context
ApplLoginContext context = new ApplLoginContext(loggedInPerson);
try
{
((WaspSession)getSession()).login(context);
}
catch (LoginException e)
{
...
}
}
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5.5.9 isn't running Quickstart
Argh. Commons logging classloader interactions are legendarily hard to debug. :-( IIRC, this fixes it. In your tomcat directories: bin/commons-logging-api.jar common/lib/log4j.jar common/lib/commons-logging.jar In your web-app directories: Whatever you like. It's also possible to embed Tomcat in a similar manner to Jetty if you wish to have something closer to your production environment. If anyone is interested in how to do that, I can post you some basic code. Good luck! Alastair 2008/6/11 Frank Silbermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I downloaded Tomcat 6 this morning, and the QuickStart project runs in it without the logging conflict I had with Tomcat 5.5.9. Perhaps a newer release of Tomcat 5.5 would also work, but I'll just go to Tomcat 6. However, I have a couple of follow-up questions: (*) My old Wicket 1.2 application, which ran in Tomcat 5.5.9, doesn't run in Tomcat 6! My guess is that Tomcat 6 removed the logging .jar that was interfering with the logging classes deployed with Wicket 1.3 applications, but now my Wicket 1.2 application on Tomcat 6 is lacking a logging implementation. Though I plan to upgrade all my Wicket 1.2 applications to Wicket 1.3, is there a recommended .jar I should add to the lib directory of my Wicket 1.2 application so it runs in Tomcat 6? (My Wicket 1.3 QuickStart adds log4j-1.2.14.jar, slf4j-api-1.4.2.jar, and slf4j-log4j12-1.4.2.jar to the application's lib directory; my Wicket 1.2 application does not add these.) (*) I really like the idea of debugging in Eclipse using in-process Jetty, even if I do deploy to Tomcat. Thanks to posts I found in the archive of this mailing list, I was able to modify the QuickStart configuration of Jetty to read the J2EE and Jetty configuration .xml files that configure my data source. However, I have another problem. My application uses images much as does in Wicket's images example. I have some image files (e.g. image1.png) stored directly inside the webapp folder, and my application references the images by generating HTML like so: html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xmlns:wicket=http://wicket.sourceforge.net/; xml:lang=en lang=en head/ body img wicket:id=picture src=image1.png alt=Picture/ /body /html The image appears when I run the application in Tomcat, but not when I run it in Eclipse with Jetty (following the process described in http://herebebeasties.com/2007-10-07/wicket-quickstart/). What do I need to change to the QuickStart's Jetty configuration so that this HTML will be able to access the image? -Original Message- From: Frank Silbermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 3:08 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.9 isn't running Quickstart I did a Windows search for files with names containing log4j and came up with nothing. I wonder whether it could be bundled into other Tomcat jars. I'm using Tomcat 5.5.9, so maybe I should try a fresh install of Tomcat, version 6, when I get back on Wednesday. -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 2:57 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.9 isn't running Quickstart it doesnt sound right. tomcat itself is writing out logs and i dont think it uses jdk logging. so there must be at least a log4j jar somewhere in tomcat install.. we have deployed in 5.5 and 6.0 previously and everything works fine. -igor On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Frank Silbermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The lib directory in the QuickStart's WEB-INF contains: log4j-1.2.14.jar slf4j-api-1.4.2.jar slf4j-log4j12-1.4.2.jar -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 11:27 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.9 isn't running Quickstart you have to at least also have log4j in there somewhere. commons-logging is just the pipeline.. -igor On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Frank Silbermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, aside from the logging-oriented jars that maven packs into the QuickStart's lib folder, the only logging jar I can see in Tomcat is in Tomcat's bin folder, named commons-logging-api.jar dated 3/26/2005. Do I need to replace that with a more recent version? Would you recommend moving to the current version of Tomcat to avoid side-effects? -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 11:07 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.9 isn't running Quickstart well, there you go, something funky with your logger jars -igor On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Frank Silbermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, yes, I thought I had checked those, but I must have missed the right log. The error messages are: The catalina.log file contains:
Re: Multiple Layouts using Inheritance
Have you looked at using styles? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Kram.V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In Wicket is it possible to inherit from multiple layouts? What we are trying to do is introduce different skins for the same application (We could control all of this in CSS and forget about it, but want to try this first) Each skin is a different Layout Page/Class in Wicket, how can we switch the inheriting Page/Class's layout. For instance: Class Skin1 extends WebPage Class Skin2 extends WebPage abstract BasePage() - Don't know how to design this one yet! MyPage extends BasePage and MyPage should use either Skin1 or Skin2 based on some criteria inside of BasePage. Is this even doable ? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Layouts-using-Inheritance-tp17786400p17786400.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multiple Layouts using Inheritance
No, I have not. I am going to start looking. If you have any links/documentation do let me know. Thank you for your help. jwcarman wrote: Have you looked at using styles? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Kram.V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In Wicket is it possible to inherit from multiple layouts? What we are trying to do is introduce different skins for the same application (We could control all of this in CSS and forget about it, but want to try this first) Each skin is a different Layout Page/Class in Wicket, how can we switch the inheriting Page/Class's layout. For instance: Class Skin1 extends WebPage Class Skin2 extends WebPage abstract BasePage() - Don't know how to design this one yet! MyPage extends BasePage and MyPage should use either Skin1 or Skin2 based on some criteria inside of BasePage. Is this even doable ? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Layouts-using-Inheritance-tp17786400p17786400.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Layouts-using-Inheritance-tp17786400p17786644.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multiple Layouts using Inheritance
It doesn't sound like you're trying to inherit anything, not in the object-oriented sense of the term. Instead you just want to use different markup for a page dependent on some criteria. Wicket already does this for localised versions of a page. HomePage.html HomePage_de.html HomePage_fr.html etc. Wicket will select the variation here by default based on the locale of your session (picked up from the browser's language headers). However, you can trivially override how this works by overriding the getVariation() method in your WebPage subclass and returning something else. Best regards, Alastair 2008/6/11 Kram.V [EMAIL PROTECTED]: In Wicket is it possible to inherit from multiple layouts? What we are trying to do is introduce different skins for the same application (We could control all of this in CSS and forget about it, but want to try this first) Each skin is a different Layout Page/Class in Wicket, how can we switch the inheriting Page/Class's layout. For instance: Class Skin1 extends WebPage Class Skin2 extends WebPage abstract BasePage() - Don't know how to design this one yet! MyPage extends BasePage and MyPage should use either Skin1 or Skin2 based on some criteria inside of BasePage. Is this even doable ? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Layouts-using-Inheritance-tp17786400p17786400.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anchors in Wicket?
This is a bookmarkable link (the only place I use it with) but you get
the idea :)
import org.apache.wicket.PageParameters;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.ComponentTag;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.link.BookmarkablePageLink;
import org.apache.wicket.model.IModel;
public class AnchoredBookmarkablePageLink extends BookmarkablePageLink {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private IModel stringAnchor;
public AnchoredBookmarkablePageLink(String id, Class pageClass, IModel
anchor) {
super(id, pageClass);
this.stringAnchor = anchor;
}
public AnchoredBookmarkablePageLink(String id, Class pageClass,
PageParameters params, IModel anchor) {
super(id, pageClass, params);
this.stringAnchor = anchor;
}
@Override
protected CharSequence appendAnchor(ComponentTag tag, CharSequence url) {
url = url + # + stringAnchor.getObject().toString();
return url;
}
}
Thijs
Michael Mehrle wrote:
Mind sharing that? ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Thijs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:23 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Anchors in Wicket?
The component is any wicket component in the same page or next page if
you know that component.
What you are doing, an anchor in a different page, I've solved by
writing my own subclass of link where I append the '#rsvp' myself.
Michael Mehrle schreef:
I don't get it - what is the 'component' in the setAnchor() method? If
I
set an anchor in a completely different page like this:
a href=#rsvp /
What do I set as the 'component' in the link's setAnchor?
Thanks,
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Thijs Vonk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:39 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Anchors in Wicket?
Michael Mehrle wrote:
How do create a link that jumps to some anchor in a page? Is there a
way
to define this in Wicket or do I have to do this manually somehow?
Michael
yes. use link.setAnchor(Component)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ListViews in a form question
This sort of stuff is definitely possible - people certainly have it working elsewhere. If you use setReuseItems(true) you need to call removeAll() if you change the backing model object. Timo is probably right that a RepeatingView may be easier to use in this kind of situation. Alastair 2008/6/11 Martin Makundi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! I have nested listviews which draw a complex tabular form having variable colspans and rowspans depending on the state of the form. I have an Add button to add elements into one of the inner listviews. Problem: 1. If I have setReuseItems true, the HTML table is not rendered properly (somehow the old table structure remains which should be restructured). 2. If I have setReuseItems false, the form components loose their state (unsubmitted entries) whenever I press the button. So. In my understanding, I need to both a) redraw the html table (at least update the colspan and rowspan attributes) and still b) preserve the form component state :) Is there an out-of-the-box solution for this? ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dropdownchoice without default option choose one
Thanks gwyn! I was not adding the default value to the ddc and that's why it was showing the choose one option. As you said, it's best to do that in the constructor. Gwyn wrote: Just to summarise, you need to do two things: set a 'current selection' and call setNullValid(false). /Gwyn On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:14 PM, nitinkc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to remove the default choose one option from the DropDownChoice component. Does anyone know how to do this. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Dropdownchoice-without-default-option-%22choose-one%22-tp17782776p17782776.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Dropdownchoice-without-default-option-%22choose-one%22-tp17782776p17786956.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5.5.9 isn't running Quickstart
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Frank Silbermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (My Wicket 1.3 QuickStart adds log4j-1.2.14.jar, slf4j-api-1.4.2.jar, and slf4j-log4j12-1.4.2.jar to the application's lib directory; my Wicket 1.2 application does not add these.) If I recall, 1.2 would have been common-logging based, hence the appearance of the slf4j jars with 1.3... My application uses images much as does in Wicket's images example. I have some image files (e.g. image1.png) stored directly inside the webapp folder, and my application references the images by generating HTML like so: ... img wicket:id=picture src=image1.png alt=Picture/ The image appears when I run the application in Tomcat, but not when I run it in Eclipse with Jetty ... That seems odd to me - the same web-app? I'm probably way off base, but I'd be double-checking where it's actually serving it from the HTML in the rendered pages... /Gwyn ...
Re: Multiple Layouts using Inheritance
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/Session.html#setStyle(java.lang.String) On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Kram.V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, I have not. I am going to start looking. If you have any links/documentation do let me know. Thank you for your help. jwcarman wrote: Have you looked at using styles? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Kram.V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In Wicket is it possible to inherit from multiple layouts? What we are trying to do is introduce different skins for the same application (We could control all of this in CSS and forget about it, but want to try this first) Each skin is a different Layout Page/Class in Wicket, how can we switch the inheriting Page/Class's layout. For instance: Class Skin1 extends WebPage Class Skin2 extends WebPage abstract BasePage() - Don't know how to design this one yet! MyPage extends BasePage and MyPage should use either Skin1 or Skin2 based on some criteria inside of BasePage. Is this even doable ? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Layouts-using-Inheritance-tp17786400p17786400.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Layouts-using-Inheritance-tp17786400p17786644.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Websphere Portal 6 + Wicket Portlet Experience
Hello all, We want to get Websphere Portal working with Wicket for the portlets, has anybody managed to do this by now? The quoted thread in which the problem is discussed suddenly fell silent :( Danny On 1/9/08, fapereira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First of all thanks forthe quicky reply. In fact im currently try to make my own implementation/changes for IBM Websphere Portal/Application 6.0 (yes both running in 6.0). I will update this thread with my feedback about my experimentations in the web fear world :) Best regards, Fernando Ate Douma wrote: Fernando, I don't use Websphere Portal 6 (mainly Jetspeed-2), but I googled a bit for their support of the Apache Bridges SerlvetContextProvider and PortletResourceURLFactory functionality. It looks like it is now possible to use Websphere and Websphere Portal specific APIs to implement these interfaces. To support the ServletContextProvider, they have just released Fix Pack 13 for Websphere 6.1 which now provides an implementation [1]. LOL, finally someone got them to allow using the Struts Bridge I wrote 3 years ago besides their own Struts Bridge implementation ;) For the PortletResourceURLFactory, AFAIK there isn't formal (IBM) support for yet, but I think it should be possible to write an implementation yourself now by looking at the new Single Portlet Refresh API in Websphere Portal 6.0.1 [2] It will require some experimenting and coding yourself, but looking at the examples given it definitely seems doable. If you do manage to get this working, please keep us informed. Would be very nice to add Websphere Portal 6 (.0.1) to the list of supported portals. NB: As the JSR-286 and the RI at Pluto is nearing its completion [3,4], I plan to start working on formal JSR-286 compliant Wicket Portlet support real soon. Then none of these proprietary interfaces will be needed as JSR-286 supports these features natively. Regards, Ate [1] http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=180uid=swg1PK52044 [2] http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/library/techarticles/0712_behl/0712_behl.html?S_TACT=105AGX10S_CMP=LP [3] http://hnsp.inf-bb.uni-jena.de/spec/ (temporarily JSR-286 drafts) [4] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/portals/pluto/branches/1.1-286-trunk-merge/ Martijn Dashorst wrote: Ate or Janne may be the ones to provide feedback. As it has been a vacation in the Netherlands, it may take a while for them to catch up. Martijn On Jan 7, 2008 12:13 PM, fapereira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any feedback please? Thanks! fapereira wrote: Hello everyone, i'm currently research the best way to use framework that can do clean as possible development for normal web apps and portlets. What i understand the way that wicket do that, its using Apache Portals Bridges, but that require that the portal server implements the current interfaces bellow: a) Apache Portals Bridges ServletContextProvider interface b) Apache Portals Bridges PortletResourceURLFactory interface My problem here its the fact i use webfear, ops.. websphere application/portal 6.0. I want to know all kind of feedback related with the experience using wicket in this specific portal/version. Thanks very much for your attention. Best Regards, Fernando. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Websphere-Portal-6-%2B-Wicket-Portlet-Experience-tp14597270p14663144.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Websphere-Portal-6-%2B-Wicket-Portlet-Experience-tp14597270p14712531.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multiple Layouts using Inheritance
Note that you can also override the style in your Component class (e.g. your WebPage subclass). The default implementation for getStyle() calls getVariation(), etc. Best to look at the source to see exactly how it works. Regards, Alastair 2008/6/11 Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/Session.html#setStyle(java.lang.String)http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/Session.html#setStyle%28java.lang.String%29 On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Kram.V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, I have not. I am going to start looking. If you have any links/documentation do let me know. Thank you for your help. jwcarman wrote: Have you looked at using styles? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Kram.V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In Wicket is it possible to inherit from multiple layouts? What we are trying to do is introduce different skins for the same application (We could control all of this in CSS and forget about it, but want to try this first) Each skin is a different Layout Page/Class in Wicket, how can we switch the inheriting Page/Class's layout. For instance: Class Skin1 extends WebPage Class Skin2 extends WebPage abstract BasePage() - Don't know how to design this one yet! MyPage extends BasePage and MyPage should use either Skin1 or Skin2 based on some criteria inside of BasePage. Is this even doable ? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Layouts-using-Inheritance-tp17786400p17786400.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Layouts-using-Inheritance-tp17786400p17786644.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat 5.5.9 isn't running Quickstart
It's the identical .war file which shows the images when run in Tomcat 6 but not when run in Jetty configured as per the QuickStart application. The actual HTML in the rendered pages is exactly what I showed you -- Wicket generated it using AttributeModifier, and I copied the generated HTML by doing show source in my browser. I'm guessing the Jetty has some default security not done in Tomcat that is protecting my image files, which I need to override somehow. Or maybe it is not automatically recognizing .png files as a MIME-type. Or maybe there's something else that must be configured in Jetty to tell it to look in the webapp folder for static content. I posted about this on the jetty-support mailing list last week (http://www.nabble.com/-Jetty-support--Embedded-jetty-td8400457.html#a17 679320), but no one answered it. -Original Message- From: Gwyn Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 3:51 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.9 isn't running Quickstart On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Frank Silbermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My application uses images much as does in Wicket's images example. I have some image files (e.g. image1.png) stored directly inside the webapp folder, and my application references the images by generating HTML like so: ... img wicket:id=picture src=image1.png alt=Picture/ The image appears when I run the application in Tomcat, but not when I run it in Eclipse with Jetty ... That seems odd to me - the same web-app? I'm probably way off base, but I'd be double-checking where it's actually serving it from the HTML in the rendered pages... /Gwyn ... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to add a TextField in a Dynamically created DefaultDataTable
I am creating a DefaultDataTable dynamically as I only know the number of columns at runtime. All is working nicely but I now need to have one of the columns contain a TextField and not a Label. I am receiving the following error: WicketMessage: Component cell must be applied to a tag of type 'input', not '' (line 0, column 0) How can I control the markup so I may change the HTML from span to input? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-add-a-TextField-in-a-Dynamically-created-DefaultDataTable-tp17788822p17788822.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat 5.5.9 isn't running Quickstart
Searching for some clue as to why my modification of the QuickStart application is serving images when run in Tomcat but not when running in embedded Jetty via Eclipse, I found: http://osdir.com/ml/java.jetty.support/2003-03/msg00045.html -- titled Re: Re: jetty can't find images: msg#00045 It says, You need the webdefaults file because it sets up the Default servlet which is what serves static resources like images. You can also manually add the Default servlet if you want to avoid a webdefaults.xml file. I think this is a clue. Looking at the console log when running Jetty in Eclipse I see: INFO - log- NO JSP Support for /, did not find org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet So what do I need to do to make it set up the Default servlet? Is there a line I need to insert into Start.java to make it read the webdefaults.xml file? I don't even have a webdefaults.xml file -- unless it's buried somewhere inside one of the Jetty jars. Here's the complete console log when debugging Start.java to bring up Jetty (as demonstrated in http://herebebeasties.com/2007-10-07/wicket-quickstart/). INFO - log- Logging to org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter(org.mortbay.log) via org.mortbay.log.Slf4jLog STARTING EMBEDDED JETTY SERVER, PRESS ANY KEY TO STOP INFO - log- jetty-6.1.4 INFO - log- NO JSP Support for /, did not find org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet INFO - log- No Transaction manager found - if your webapp requires one, please configure one. INFO - Application- [TestApplication] init: Wicket core library initializer INFO - RequestListenerInterface - registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IBehaviorListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.behavior.IBehaviorListener.onRequest()] INFO - RequestListenerInterface - registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IBehaviorListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.behavior.IBehaviorListener.onRequest()] INFO - RequestListenerInterface - registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IFormSubmitListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.IFormSubmitListener.onFormSubmitted() ] INFO - RequestListenerInterface - registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IFormSubmitListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.IFormSubmitListener.onFormSubmitted() ] INFO - RequestListenerInterface - registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=ILinkListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.markup.html.link.ILinkListener.onLinkClicked()] INFO - RequestListenerInterface - registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=ILinkListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.markup.html.link.ILinkListener.onLinkClicked()] INFO - RequestListenerInterface - registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IOnChangeListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.IOnChangeListener.onSelectionChanged( )] INFO - RequestListenerInterface - registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IOnChangeListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.IOnChangeListener.onSelectionChanged( )] INFO - RequestListenerInterface - registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IRedirectListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.IRedirectListener.onRedirect()] INFO - RequestListenerInterface - registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IRedirectListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.IRedirectListener.onRedirect()] INFO - RequestListenerInterface - registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IResourceListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.IResourceListener.onResourceRequested()] INFO - RequestListenerInterface - registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IResourceListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.IResourceListener.onResourceRequested()] INFO - Application- [TestApplication] init: Wicket extensions initializer INFO - WebApplication - [TestApplication] Started Wicket version 1.3.3 in development mode *** WARNING: Wicket is running in DEVELOPMENT mode. *** *** ^^^*** *** Do NOT deploy to your live server(s) without changing this. *** *** See Application#getConfigurationType() for more information. *** INFO - log- Started [EMAIL PROTECTED]:8080 -Original Message- From: Frank Silbermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 4:41 PM To:
RE: Anchors in Wicket?
Hey, thanks a lot Thijs! I'll give this a shot.
-Original Message-
From: Thijs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 1:38 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Anchors in Wicket?
This is a bookmarkable link (the only place I use it with) but you get
the idea :)
import org.apache.wicket.PageParameters;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.ComponentTag;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.link.BookmarkablePageLink;
import org.apache.wicket.model.IModel;
public class AnchoredBookmarkablePageLink extends BookmarkablePageLink {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private IModel stringAnchor;
public AnchoredBookmarkablePageLink(String id, Class pageClass, IModel
anchor) {
super(id, pageClass);
this.stringAnchor = anchor;
}
public AnchoredBookmarkablePageLink(String id, Class pageClass,
PageParameters params, IModel anchor) {
super(id, pageClass, params);
this.stringAnchor = anchor;
}
@Override
protected CharSequence appendAnchor(ComponentTag tag, CharSequence url) {
url = url + # + stringAnchor.getObject().toString();
return url;
}
}
Thijs
Michael Mehrle wrote:
Mind sharing that? ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Thijs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:23 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Anchors in Wicket?
The component is any wicket component in the same page or next page if
you know that component.
What you are doing, an anchor in a different page, I've solved by
writing my own subclass of link where I append the '#rsvp' myself.
Michael Mehrle schreef:
I don't get it - what is the 'component' in the setAnchor() method? If
I
set an anchor in a completely different page like this:
a href=#rsvp /
What do I set as the 'component' in the link's setAnchor?
Thanks,
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Thijs Vonk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:39 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Anchors in Wicket?
Michael Mehrle wrote:
How do create a link that jumps to some anchor in a page? Is there a
way
to define this in Wicket or do I have to do this manually somehow?
Michael
yes. use link.setAnchor(Component)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: users, please give us your opinion: what is your take on generics with Wicket
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I vote the same way. with almost the exact same sentiments. Wouter de Vaal wrote: 1) Generifying* Wicket [x] Can best be done like currently in the 1.4 branch, where models and components are both generified. I care most about the improved static type checking generified models and components give Wicket. I had a production quality project with the old 2.0 branch (downgraded it) and that worked just fine and very intuitive, I was very bummed at the time I had to add all these hideous type casts. I do not understand the fuss about generifying everything, I did not have ANY problems using the generics in my production project (which consists of about 30 wicket classes) and it was not a simple crud app, I did some funky wicket stuff with this project (loads of panels, fragment, own custom component, ajax) and it all just worked. 2) How strongly do you feel about your choice above? [X] Whatever choice ultimately made, I'll happily convert/ start using 1.4 and up. Wouter de Vaal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- Philip A. Chapman Desktop and Web Application Development: Java, .NET, PostgreSQL, MySQL, MSSQL Linux, Windows 2000, Windows XP -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIUHzDAdpynRSGw3URAkdFAJsFWUKlbu27zE2LidYx3HdJUZt4cQCcDBX/ Ner0sbazi8jh/EllYZVgW1s= =WPF9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to add a TextField in a Dynamically created DefaultDataTable
wrap the textfield in a fragment or a panel -igor On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:39 PM, galbelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am creating a DefaultDataTable dynamically as I only know the number of columns at runtime. All is working nicely but I now need to have one of the columns contain a TextField and not a Label. I am receiving the following error: WicketMessage: Component cell must be applied to a tag of type 'input', not '' (line 0, column 0) How can I control the markup so I may change the HTML from span to input? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-add-a-TextField-in-a-Dynamically-created-DefaultDataTable-tp17788822p17788822.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to update parent component from a panel?
Hello Timo,
Thanks a lot...i have attach the files for sample webapp for events.you can
play around with if you have time and forgive me if my codes were ugly :) i
just want to test your patch...any feedback after...
Thanks a lot...Cheers
http://www.nabble.com/file/p17791744/events_core.zip events_core.zip br/
http://www.nabble.com/file/p17791744/pages_app.zip pages_app.zip
Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, freak182 wrote:
I already rip out your patch and run the testcase it worked but how can i
implement/intgerate to my project...do you have a working example project
for that?
Unfortunately not, but just copy the classes to a suitable
package in your project and start using them in the same way
as in the test cases.
E.g. something along these lines
public class FooSelectionEvent implements Event {
private final IModel foo;
private final AjaxRequestTarget target;
public FooSelectionEvent(IModel foo, AjaxRequestTarget target) {
this.foo = foo;
this.target = target;
}
public Foo getFoo() {
return (Foo) foo.getObject();
}
public void addToTarget(Component c) {
target.addComponent(c);
}
}
public interface FooSelectionReceiver extends EventReceiver {
void onEvent(FooSelectionEvent event);
}
public class SelectedFooLabel extends Label implements
FooSelectionReceiver {
...
public void onEvent(FooSelectionEvent event) {
setModelObject(event.getFoo());
event.addToTarget(this);
}
}
public class FooPanel extends Panel {
private EventBroadcaster broadcaster = new EventBroadcaster(this);
...
add(new DropDownChoice(fooSelection, fooSelection, fooList)
.add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange) {
public void onEvent(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
broadcaster.broadcast(FooSelectionReceiver.class, new
FooSelectionEvent(target, fooSelection));
}
});
...
}
Now SelectedFooLabel receives the events sent from the
DropDownChoice, provided that both component instances are on
the same page (you must be careful with repeater items and
other replaced components here).
Best wishes,
Timo
--
Timo Rantalaiho
Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-update-parent-component-from-a-panel--tp17748294p17791744.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: enclosure around listview
Paste code of what you're looking to do. Your description seems like the
right way to do it. If you want that out of the box, just roll your own
NotVisibleIfEmptyListView that overrides isVisible. Like:
public abstract class NotVisibleIfEmptyListViewT extends ListViewT {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public NotVisibleIfEmptyListView(String id, IModelListT model) {
super(id, model);
}
@Override
public boolean isVisible() {
return CollectionUtils.isEmpty(getModelObject()) == false;
}
}
If you have other related markup (like you'll commonly have a UL tag, and
the list view is in your LI tag, just put a wicket enclosure around the
related markup (as you mentioned), and make it depend on the visibility of
the list view.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Matthijs Wensveen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Gwyn Evans wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Matthijs Wensveen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there a way to hide a listview with an enclosure when there are no
items
to display? One way to get it working is to toggle the visibility of the
listview based on wheter or not the list is empty or not.
I think that's the normal way, in that you'd typically have both the list
and a No items found label, then set one or the other as visible...
I was expecting this would work out-of-the-box though...
JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET) covers Wishes as
well
as Bugs! :-)
/Gwyn
I wish I knew what to wish for exactly... :D
Thanks,
Matthijs
--
Matthijs Wensveen
Func. Internet Integration
W http://www.func.nl
T +31 20 423
F +31 20 4223500
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Example of wicketstuff-minis' Veil
sorry, havent had time to check out the source from svn yet -igor On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:53 AM, nitinkc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Igor, Any updates on this?? thanks! nitinkc wrote: Here is the stack trace: Root cause:java.lang.IllegalStateException: This behavior is already bound to component. An instance of this behavior cannot be reused between components. Bound component: [MarkupContainer [Component id = test, page = No Page, path = test.Button]] at org.wicketstuff.minis.veil.Veil.bind(Veil.java:64) at org.apache.wicket.Component.add(Component.java:922) at com.uprr.app.hrw.wicket.page.scheduling.EventDetailsPage.init(EventDetailsPage.java:235) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:494) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:350) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:303) at org.apache.wicket.session.DefaultPageFactory.newPage(DefaultPageFactory.java:58) at org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.newPage(BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.java:262) at org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.getPage(BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.java:283) at org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.processEvents(BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.java:210) at org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.processEvents(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:90) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:1166) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1241) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1316) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:493) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:354) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:194) at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:42) at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run(WebAppServletContext.java:3393) at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321) at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(Unknown Source) at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(WebAppServletContext.java:2140) at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.execute(WebAppServletContext.java:2046) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.run(ServletRequestImpl.java:1366) at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:200) at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172) I am using: wicketstuff-minis-1.3.0-SNAPSHOT.jar igor.vaynberg wrote: can you paste the stack trace please? are you using latest trunk? -igor On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 6:38 AM, nitinkc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need an example of wicketstuff-minis' veil behavior. I added this to one of my components but keep getting the error that the behavior is already bound to another component and cannot be reused. All I am doing is: Button button = new Button(test); button.add(new Veil()); form.add(button); This is the only Veil I am using on my page. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Example-of-wicketstuff-minis%27-Veil-tp17623741p17623741.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Example-of-wicketstuff-minis%27-Veil-tp17623741p17784653.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: forcing cookies to expire
I know this doesn't relate to your question, and I don't know what your app
is at all, but does this cookie automatically log someone in to your app if
they come back later? If so, you probably don't want to use the username
for that. Then I can just pick someone else's username, fake my cookie, and
come to the app and be logged in as them.
You're probably not doing that - maybe you're just using it like Josh was -
to prefill a username field - but I would've felt remiss if I didn't mention
it. :)
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:13 AM, jchappelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have to have it set on root. In fact now my code doesn't call
setPath
at all and it works fine.
This is actually my first time ever using cookies. I've developed
traditional applications in the past. I really only need the cookie to be
visible to my login page but it doesn't really hurt if it is visible to any
other pages because this is the only place(as of now) that we use cookies
in
our product.
How would I specify the path so that only my login page would be visible?
Since this is wicket and the URL paths are weird I don't really know how I
would do that.
Thanks,
Josh
Johan Compagner wrote:
Because we cant really just call set path... That is something that
you have to do. Why do you want it on root?
On 6/10/08, jchappelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply. I finally fixed the problem. What I found
was
that when I was creating my cookie I was calling setPath(/) and when I
deleted it I was not calling setPath(/). So I guess the equals method
saw
them as two different cookies and it wasn't deleting it. There is
actually a
convenience method on the WebResponse class called clearCookie that I am
calling. However, that method will not work if you have called
setPath(/)
on your cookie because it doesn't set the path. It just does the
following:
public void clearCookie(final Cookie cookie)
{
if (httpServletResponse != null)
{
cookie.setMaxAge(0);
cookie.setValue(null);
addCookie(cookie);
}
}
Thanks,
Josh
richardwilko wrote:
Ive had the same problem. to delete a cookie do this:
Cookie newCookie = new Cookie(my cookie name here!, null);
newCookie.setMaxAge(0);
newCookie.setPath(/);
getWebRequestCycle().getWebResponse().addCookie(newCookie);
i dont know why (i didnt really look into it) but u seem to have to
create
a new cookie with the same name and add it. maybe this is a wicket
bug?
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/forcing-cookies-to-expire-tp17067292p17760587.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/forcing-cookies-to-expire-tp17067292p17780251.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
Making Component easier to Generify
Have you considered moving from subclassing to composition in Wicket using CallableT? Currently it is quite common for developers to subclass a component in order to override isVisible() and other properties. I am proposing that instead the component classes become final and properties may only be set using setter methods. The setter methods would take CallableT instead of T, so for example setVisible(boolean) would become setVisible(CallableBoolean) The benefit of this approach is that you could introduce static factory methods to the Wicket components which would make them much easier to use in their Generic form. You could then introduce various helper classes to create CallableT for constant values, such as Callable.valueOf(true) would return a CallableBoolean that always returns true. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/users%2C-please-give-us-your-opinion%3A-what-is-your-take-on-generics-with-Wicket-tp17589984p17792488.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ListViews in a form question
Hi! What is the main difference between repeatingView and listView from this point of view? I can see ListView has many features I do not use such a s moving the rows up and down... ** Martin 2008/6/11 Al Maw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This sort of stuff is definitely possible - people certainly have it working elsewhere. If you use setReuseItems(true) you need to call removeAll() if you change the backing model object. Timo is probably right that a RepeatingView may be easier to use in this kind of situation. Alastair 2008/6/11 Martin Makundi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! I have nested listviews which draw a complex tabular form having variable colspans and rowspans depending on the state of the form. I have an Add button to add elements into one of the inner listviews. Problem: 1. If I have setReuseItems true, the HTML table is not rendered properly (somehow the old table structure remains which should be restructured). 2. If I have setReuseItems false, the form components loose their state (unsubmitted entries) whenever I press the button. So. In my understanding, I need to both a) redraw the html table (at least update the colspan and rowspan attributes) and still b) preserve the form component state :) Is there an out-of-the-box solution for this? ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: beginner question about models when having more than one component of the same type on the same page
Thanks Timo for your very helpful suggestion!
Best Regards,
/Peter
2008/6/11 Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Peter Eriksson wrote:
I will answer my own post, just in case somebody else is looking for a
solution to the same problem. I have found two ways to get the resource
loading to do exactly what I want (There are probably a lot more out
there):
Thanks for posting that, and cool that you found it out!
add(new Label(nameLabel, new StringResourceModel(nameLabel,
this, null)));
add(new Label(name));
These Label pairs smell like a custom component to me, e.g.
public class LabeledText extends WebMarkupContainer {
public LabeledText(String textId, MarkupContainer parent) {
super(textId + Container);
String labelId = textId + Label;
add(new Label(labelId, new StringResourceModel(labelId, parent,
null)));
add(new Label(textId);
}
}
Then in ContactPanel constructor you do
add(new LabeledText(userName, this));
add(new LabeledText(phone, this));
add(new LabeledText(email, this));
and change the markup accordingly (to something like
wicket:panel
table
tr wicket:id=nameContainer
tdspan wicket:id=nameLabel/span/td
tdspan wicket:id=name/span/td
/tr
...
)
Best wishes,
Timo
--
Timo Rantalaiho
Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
