Re: Getting Page Expired in Glassfish but not in Jetty

2009-12-09 Thread zlus...@gmail.com

Hi,

Check that session cookies are not mixed up between the application 
servers. I had PageExpired exceptions when testing the same application 
on the very same browser with WebLogic and Tomcat, and that was caused 
by that both servers are using the JSESSIONID cookie, but with different 
paths, so actually there was two JSESSIONID cookies appearing in the 
browser. And because wrong cookie was picked up the session was always 
recreated, which was causing PageExpired exceptions. The easy solution 
was to configure WebLogic to use an other cookie name, and after that 
everything worked fine. For testing just clear the cookies in your 
browser before/when switching between app servers.

Cheers,
Zoltan

Early Morning írta:

Well yes, ideally, but it is easier to not use such a heavy appserver when
developing, so we make do with an internal QA deployment on Glassfish :) In
any case, I was more wondering about the differences between how appservers
handle wicket page versions and the like, since I'd like to understand why
such differences exist. In any case, I'll check for serialization errors
first. Thanks!


Regards,

Ces

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:52 AM, b...@actrix.gen.nz wrote:

  

Hi,

It is usually easier to have identical development and production
platforms. If then you get an error as you describe, you usually catch
it in development before it reaches production.

So why don't you develop with GlassFish?


Bernard



On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:36:49 +0800, you wrote:



Hi all,

Currently I have a problem with my application wherein when I press the
  

Back


button of the browser and navigate to a new page, I get a Page Expired
  

error


consistently. However, this only happens when my application is deployed
  

in


Glassfish, but not when I run it using Jetty. Any suggestions for what I
should check?

Related to that, I also experienced an error wherein there was a
target.add(form) in the onSubmit method of the button, which caused an
Exception in Glassfish whenever the feedback panel within the form was
  

added


because the page could not be constructed; however In Jetty, the same code
caused no errors. The fix (removing target.add(form)) was simple enough,
  

but


I was hoping someone could enlighten me regarding how different appservers
handle wicket page versions, etc. Is there a resource I can look up for
this? Thanks!


Regards,

Ces
  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org





  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: Date Picker in Editable TreeTable in IE7 and IE8

2009-10-12 Thread zlus...@gmail.com

Hi,

Try to play with z-index css value; increase it, and it should bring the 
calendar control above the other parts of the table. We are also using 
the YUI calendar widget inside a table, see this page on JavaForge: 
http://www.javaforge.com/proj/tracker/submitNew.do?tracker_id=5407. 
(Sorry guys for showing a struts page here ;-).


The calendar markup is wrapped in a span 
class=calOuterContainer.../span. The relevan css is:


/* relative puts the calendar where the container is on screen */
.calOuterContainer {
   position: relative;
   z-index:20;
   /* holy hack for IE6 scrollbar bug on relative positioned controller
   see: http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/unscrollable.html
   */
   height: 1%;
}

I hope that helps,
Zoltan


John MacEnri írta:

Rolling my own seems like a pretty heavyweight solution. The control for the
most part is fine. (Though the lack of any year change ability is a
significant drawback)

What I'm trying to find out is whether anyone else is having any trouble
with the YUI datepicker in IE7 or IE8 when used within a Table or TreeTable.
Thanks

John

2009/10/10 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com

  

you can always roll your own datepicker if the YUI one does not work
properly.

-igor

On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:13 PM, John MacEnri john.mace...@gmail.com
wrote:


Hi,


I'm new to Wicket this week, so not familiar with the expected format or
structure of emails to this mailing list.

I picked Wicket after trawling around for a framework that would enable
  

UI


programming on the Web make sense again. It's been an absolute pleasure
  

so


far. Compared to the pain I've felt for some time now battling with web
application frameworks where most of the code of the applications was in
XML, JS, JSP etc. etc. and a light sprinkling of actual Java, the
  

elegance


of Wicket as a natural UI programming environment makes everything seem
possible and even enjoyable again. Thanks.

But, (there always is a but:-) ), I'm struggling with an issue I've hit
  

with


the DatePicker and can't seem to resolve it.

I'm using Wicket 1.4.1.
I used the Editable TreeTable example from the Wicket site as a starter
  

for


the very small app I needed to write.
Rather than just text editable columns though, I'm making them more type
specific, so one of them is for Dates and shows a DateTextField and a
DatePicker.

The app is working fine in Firefox but the DatePicker is always caught
behind the rows above and below when I run the app in IE7 or 8.
The attached screen snippets show the difference. I've dug deep into the
  

css


and used the developer tools in IE8 which give you something akin to
  

Firebug


but couldn't find  any css change would fix it.

Is there a way to fix this or an alternative date picker?

Thanks

John





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org





  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org