Re: Wicket / Hibernate / Databinder (dead?)
Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote: > > I also have a bit of code we have been working on.. > > I was sorta procrastinating with it on my local box. > > Things have been rather overwhelming lately. > > If you would like to make a pull request, I will gladly review it, and > merge > it into my branch. > > I actually have some work regarding integration for the conversation scope > with spring. > So far, all I've done is change the count() casting from (Integer) to (Number) since later versions of Hibernate return a Long. I'm on vacation for this week, but will be looking into it later. I'm a 100% git newb, so I'll ensure I've done everything correctly before e-mailing you with a pull request. Thanks! Jake -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-Hibernate-Databinder-dead-tp3557635p3561938.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket / Hibernate / Databinder (dead?)
I also have a bit of code we have been working on.. I was sorta procrastinating with it on my local box. Things have been rather overwhelming lately. If you would like to make a pull request, I will gladly review it, and merge it into my branch. I actually have some work regarding integration for the conversation scope with spring. On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 3:43 PM, James Carman wrote: > Wicketopia doesn't require spring. > On May 28, 2011 3:13 PM, "jbrookover" wrote: > > > > James Carman wrote: > >> > >> You could check out Wicketopia. It has support for Hibernate. You > >> can run the example application to see how it works. > >> > > > > I've been doing some searching and found many of your replies to this > > statement, but I was thinking without Spring involvement. I don't have > any > > solid reasons for not using Spring other than I have no idea what it does > > and haven't needed it :) Seems very heavy whereas Databinder was > extremely > > light. Granted, perhaps Spring is in my future. > > > > > > Daniel Toffetti wrote: > >> > >> AFAIK Nathan was not maintaining it anymore but Rodolfo Hansen was > working > >> on it a while ago to get it up to new versions of Hibernate and Wicket, > >> please check here: https://github.com/kryptt, last updates are from > April > >> 5. > >> > > > > Those updates were just to the project structure, I believe. I checked > out > > the project and made my own changes to the snapshot to get it working. > > There are many more changes and, being a newb to Git, I'm still working > on > > getting those back into the mainstream. This is what prompted this thread > - > > I don't want to make these fixes if people are using some other light > > library. > > > > Still seems like a common issue. People out there must be using Wicket + > > Hibernate without Spring, right? > > > > Jake > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-Hibernate-Databinder-dead-tp3557635p3557917.html > > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > -- Rodolfo Hansen CTO, KindleIT Software Development Email: rhan...@kitsd.com Mobile: +1 (809) 860-6669
Re: Wicket / Hibernate / Databinder (dead?)
Wicketopia doesn't require spring. On May 28, 2011 3:13 PM, "jbrookover" wrote: > > James Carman wrote: >> >> You could check out Wicketopia. It has support for Hibernate. You >> can run the example application to see how it works. >> > > I've been doing some searching and found many of your replies to this > statement, but I was thinking without Spring involvement. I don't have any > solid reasons for not using Spring other than I have no idea what it does > and haven't needed it :) Seems very heavy whereas Databinder was extremely > light. Granted, perhaps Spring is in my future. > > > Daniel Toffetti wrote: >> >> AFAIK Nathan was not maintaining it anymore but Rodolfo Hansen was working >> on it a while ago to get it up to new versions of Hibernate and Wicket, >> please check here: https://github.com/kryptt, last updates are from April >> 5. >> > > Those updates were just to the project structure, I believe. I checked out > the project and made my own changes to the snapshot to get it working. > There are many more changes and, being a newb to Git, I'm still working on > getting those back into the mainstream. This is what prompted this thread - > I don't want to make these fixes if people are using some other light > library. > > Still seems like a common issue. People out there must be using Wicket + > Hibernate without Spring, right? > > Jake > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-Hibernate-Databinder-dead-tp3557635p3557917.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >
Re: Wicket / Hibernate / Databinder (dead?)
James Carman wrote: > > You could check out Wicketopia. It has support for Hibernate. You > can run the example application to see how it works. > I've been doing some searching and found many of your replies to this statement, but I was thinking without Spring involvement. I don't have any solid reasons for not using Spring other than I have no idea what it does and haven't needed it :) Seems very heavy whereas Databinder was extremely light. Granted, perhaps Spring is in my future. Daniel Toffetti wrote: > > AFAIK Nathan was not maintaining it anymore but Rodolfo Hansen was working > on it a while ago to get it up to new versions of Hibernate and Wicket, > please check here: https://github.com/kryptt, last updates are from April > 5. > Those updates were just to the project structure, I believe. I checked out the project and made my own changes to the snapshot to get it working. There are many more changes and, being a newb to Git, I'm still working on getting those back into the mainstream. This is what prompted this thread - I don't want to make these fixes if people are using some other light library. Still seems like a common issue. People out there must be using Wicket + Hibernate without Spring, right? Jake -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-Hibernate-Databinder-dead-tp3557635p3557917.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket / Hibernate / Databinder (dead?)
jbrookover wrote: > > We've been using Wicket 1.4 + Hibernate 3.3 + Databinder 1.3.0 for quite > some time now. I wanted to update to a more recent version of Hibernate, > but Databinder was incompatible and seems pretty dead. > > My question is what do people use for their bridge between Wicket and > Hibernate? Do you all write your own LoadableDetachableModels to load > from the database? Is there an alternative to Databinder that I don't > know about? A wicketstuff wiki page mentioned 'HibernateModel' but I > haven't seen any actual code. > > I love Databinder's HibernateObjectModel, SortableHibernateProvider, etc. > If there's nothing else, I'll keep on updating them, but I wanted to make > sure there wasn't some more active alternative. > Hi, AFAIK Nathan was not maintaining it anymore but Rodolfo Hansen was working on it a while ago to get it up to new versions of Hibernate and Wicket, please check here: https://github.com/kryptt, last updates are from April 5. Cheers, Daniel -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-Hibernate-Databinder-dead-tp3557635p3557902.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket / Hibernate / Databinder (dead?)
You could check out Wicketopia. It has support for Hibernate. You can run the example application to see how it works. On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:48 AM, jbrookover wrote: > Hey all, > > First off, apologies for a potential dual post - I used nabble and posted to > a super-level to this list. > > We've been using Wicket 1.4 + Hibernate 3.3 + Databinder 1.3.0 for quite > some time now. I wanted to update to a more recent version of Hibernate, > but Databinder was incompatible and seems pretty dead. > > My question is what do people use for their bridge between Wicket and > Hibernate? Do you all write your own LoadableDetachableModels to load from > the database? Is there an alternative to Databinder that I don't know > about? A wicketstuff wiki page mentioned 'HibernateModel' but I haven't > seen any actual code. > > I love Databinder's HibernateObjectModel, SortableHibernateProvider, etc. > If there's nothing else, I'll keep on updating them, but I wanted to make > sure there wasn't some more active alternative. > > Thanks! > > Jake > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-Hibernate-Databinder-dead-tp3557635p3557635.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
