James Carman wrote: > > You could check out Wicketopia. It has support for Hibernate. You > can run the example application to see how it works. >
I've been doing some searching and found many of your replies to this statement, but I was thinking without Spring involvement. I don't have any solid reasons for not using Spring other than I have no idea what it does and haven't needed it :) Seems very heavy whereas Databinder was extremely light. Granted, perhaps Spring is in my future. Daniel Toffetti wrote: > > AFAIK Nathan was not maintaining it anymore but Rodolfo Hansen was working > on it a while ago to get it up to new versions of Hibernate and Wicket, > please check here: https://github.com/kryptt, last updates are from April > 5. > Those updates were just to the project structure, I believe. I checked out the project and made my own changes to the snapshot to get it working. There are many more changes and, being a newb to Git, I'm still working on getting those back into the mainstream. This is what prompted this thread - I don't want to make these fixes if people are using some other light library. Still seems like a common issue. People out there must be using Wicket + Hibernate without Spring, right? Jake -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-Hibernate-Databinder-dead-tp3557635p3557917.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
