Re: Shared resources with parameters?
. called for example by ResourceLink or Image johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Erik van Oosten e.vanoos...@grons.nl wrote: Hi Lars, They are not that static :) We import and export the images from a database we manage. By 'static' I meant that the images do not change over time, so I want fixed URLs for them. Sorry for the confusion. Regards, Erik. lars vonk wrote: You could put Apache in front and let it serve you static images? Lars On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Erik van Oosten e.vanoos...@grons.nl wrote: Hi, I am looking for a way to serve many static images. It is important that I do not have to separately register them (as with SharedResources, as I understood) as there about 20.000 to 50.000 of them, and the set changes continuously. The most obvious thing that comes to mind is a static resource that takes parameters that are extracted from the URL (similar to Page). But I could not find such a thing. I am now considering implementing a servlet, but I'd rather stay within the framework. Regards, Erik. -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Shared-resources-with-parameters--tp16272101p27717799.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Shared resources with parameters?
Hi Erik, you might want to use IndexedPageParams, so you could do: mount(/myPath, myForwardClass.class); in init; the parameter with index 0 is the first one, the index 1 is second and so on, delimiteds are the ones by / eg: myapp.com/myPath/param0/param1/param2 ... and so on; alternatively you can use 1 named param (here example) and have the real URLs be manipulated by replacing each / to some kind of letter that doesnt exist in your target-scheme, eg: / - _ so you get myapp.com/myPath/example/mytarget_myfile.ending - your param example then holds mytarget_myfile.ending wich needs to be rechanged then; the page itself might hold a simple Label that displays the content based on the params; Hope that helps to get started, Best, Korbinian Erik van Oosten schrieb: Hi, I am looking for a way to serve many static images. It is important that I do not have to separately register them (as with SharedResources, as I understood) as there about 20.000 to 50.000 of them, and the set changes continuously. The most obvious thing that comes to mind is a static resource that takes parameters that are extracted from the URL (similar to Page). But I could not find such a thing. I am now considering implementing a servlet, but I'd rather stay within the framework. Regards, Erik. -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shared resources with parameters?
Hi, I am looking for a way to serve many static images. It is important that I do not have to separately register them (as with SharedResources, as I understood) as there about 20.000 to 50.000 of them, and the set changes continuously. The most obvious thing that comes to mind is a static resource that takes parameters that are extracted from the URL (similar to Page). But I could not find such a thing. I am now considering implementing a servlet, but I'd rather stay within the framework. Regards, Erik. -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Shared resources with parameters?
You could put Apache in front and let it serve you static images? Lars On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am looking for a way to serve many static images. It is important that I do not have to separately register them (as with SharedResources, as I understood) as there about 20.000 to 50.000 of them, and the set changes continuously. The most obvious thing that comes to mind is a static resource that takes parameters that are extracted from the URL (similar to Page). But I could not find such a thing. I am now considering implementing a servlet, but I'd rather stay within the framework. Regards, Erik. -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Shared resources with parameters?
or the app server which ever it is.. but where are the located? On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:19 AM, lars vonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You could put Apache in front and let it serve you static images? Lars On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am looking for a way to serve many static images. It is important that I do not have to separately register them (as with SharedResources, as I understood) as there about 20.000 to 50.000 of them, and the set changes continuously. The most obvious thing that comes to mind is a static resource that takes parameters that are extracted from the URL (similar to Page). But I could not find such a thing. I am now considering implementing a servlet, but I'd rather stay within the framework. Regards, Erik. -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Shared resources with parameters?
Hi Lars, They are not that static :) We import and export the images from a database we manage. By 'static' I meant that the images do not change over time, so I want fixed URLs for them. Sorry for the confusion. Regards, Erik. lars vonk wrote: You could put Apache in front and let it serve you static images? Lars On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am looking for a way to serve many static images. It is important that I do not have to separately register them (as with SharedResources, as I understood) as there about 20.000 to 50.000 of them, and the set changes continuously. The most obvious thing that comes to mind is a static resource that takes parameters that are extracted from the URL (similar to Page). But I could not find such a thing. I am now considering implementing a servlet, but I'd rather stay within the framework. Regards, Erik. -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Shared resources with parameters?
and inside the resource you do RequestCycle.get().getRequest().getParameter(foo); -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok just make such a class make a (Dynamic)Resource that you add to the shared resources That resource looks in the params to figure out what to serve with RequestCycle.urlFor(final ResourceReference resourceReference, ValueMap parameters) you can create urls with those params. called for example by ResourceLink or Image johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Lars, They are not that static :) We import and export the images from a database we manage. By 'static' I meant that the images do not change over time, so I want fixed URLs for them. Sorry for the confusion. Regards, Erik. lars vonk wrote: You could put Apache in front and let it serve you static images? Lars On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am looking for a way to serve many static images. It is important that I do not have to separately register them (as with SharedResources, as I understood) as there about 20.000 to 50.000 of them, and the set changes continuously. The most obvious thing that comes to mind is a static resource that takes parameters that are extracted from the URL (similar to Page). But I could not find such a thing. I am now considering implementing a servlet, but I'd rather stay within the framework. Regards, Erik. -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Shared resources with parameters?
no do resource/this.getParameters() dont try to get the RequestCylce if it is a HEAD request (last modified check) it doesn't have to be there.. johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and inside the resource you do RequestCycle.get().getRequest().getParameter(foo); -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok just make such a class make a (Dynamic)Resource that you add to the shared resources That resource looks in the params to figure out what to serve with RequestCycle.urlFor(final ResourceReference resourceReference, ValueMap parameters) you can create urls with those params. called for example by ResourceLink or Image johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Lars, They are not that static :) We import and export the images from a database we manage. By 'static' I meant that the images do not change over time, so I want fixed URLs for them. Sorry for the confusion. Regards, Erik. lars vonk wrote: You could put Apache in front and let it serve you static images? Lars On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am looking for a way to serve many static images. It is important that I do not have to separately register them (as with SharedResources, as I understood) as there about 20.000 to 50.000 of them, and the set changes continuously. The most obvious thing that comes to mind is a static resource that takes parameters that are extracted from the URL (similar to Page). But I could not find such a thing. I am now considering implementing a servlet, but I'd rather stay within the framework. Regards, Erik. -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Shared resources with parameters?
well, hopefully you dont instantiate the resource stream if its just a HEAD response... -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no do resource/this.getParameters() dont try to get the RequestCylce if it is a HEAD request (last modified check) it doesn't have to be there.. johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and inside the resource you do RequestCycle.get().getRequest().getParameter(foo); -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok just make such a class make a (Dynamic)Resource that you add to the shared resources That resource looks in the params to figure out what to serve with RequestCycle.urlFor(final ResourceReference resourceReference, ValueMap parameters) you can create urls with those params. called for example by ResourceLink or Image johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Lars, They are not that static :) We import and export the images from a database we manage. By 'static' I meant that the images do not change over time, so I want fixed URLs for them. Sorry for the confusion. Regards, Erik. lars vonk wrote: You could put Apache in front and let it serve you static images? Lars On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am looking for a way to serve many static images. It is important that I do not have to separately register them (as with SharedResources, as I understood) as there about 20.000 to 50.000 of them, and the set changes continuously. The most obvious thing that comes to mind is a static resource that takes parameters that are extracted from the URL (similar to Page). But I could not find such a thing. I am now considering implementing a servlet, but I'd rather stay within the framework. Regards, Erik. -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Shared resources with parameters?
no but the params could contain a filename and against that you check the last modified time stamp also in the DB just also for performance, if we call: public abstract IResourceStream getResourceStream(); then dont already get all the data. Because that call can also just be used for lastModified() check. that should only lazy be done with the IResourceStream.getInputStream() call johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well, hopefully you dont instantiate the resource stream if its just a HEAD response... -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no do resource/this.getParameters() dont try to get the RequestCylce if it is a HEAD request (last modified check) it doesn't have to be there.. johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and inside the resource you do RequestCycle.get().getRequest().getParameter(foo); -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok just make such a class make a (Dynamic)Resource that you add to the shared resources That resource looks in the params to figure out what to serve with RequestCycle.urlFor(final ResourceReference resourceReference, ValueMap parameters) you can create urls with those params. called for example by ResourceLink or Image johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Lars, They are not that static :) We import and export the images from a database we manage. By 'static' I meant that the images do not change over time, so I want fixed URLs for them. Sorry for the confusion. Regards, Erik. lars vonk wrote: You could put Apache in front and let it serve you static images? Lars On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am looking for a way to serve many static images. It is important that I do not have to separately register them (as with SharedResources, as I understood) as there about 20.000 to 50.000 of them, and the set changes continuously. The most obvious thing that comes to mind is a static resource that takes parameters that are extracted from the URL (similar to Page). But I could not find such a thing. I am now considering implementing a servlet, but I'd rather stay within the framework. Regards, Erik. -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Shared resources with parameters?
the whole resource thing is soo bloated. something we should simplify in 1.5. im all for getting rid of it entirely. we already have a nice interface for streams and that is called IRequestTarget, just need to add a lastmodifiedtime() to it and we are done :) and it also gets rid of the inputstream-outputstream inconsistency. why should a resource provide an inputstream and us copy it when the resource can just dump it into the response directly... -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no but the params could contain a filename and against that you check the last modified time stamp also in the DB just also for performance, if we call: public abstract IResourceStream getResourceStream(); then dont already get all the data. Because that call can also just be used for lastModified() check. that should only lazy be done with the IResourceStream.getInputStream() call johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well, hopefully you dont instantiate the resource stream if its just a HEAD response... -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no do resource/this.getParameters() dont try to get the RequestCylce if it is a HEAD request (last modified check) it doesn't have to be there.. johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and inside the resource you do RequestCycle.get().getRequest().getParameter(foo); -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok just make such a class make a (Dynamic)Resource that you add to the shared resources That resource looks in the params to figure out what to serve with RequestCycle.urlFor(final ResourceReference resourceReference, ValueMap parameters) you can create urls with those params. called for example by ResourceLink or Image johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Lars, They are not that static :) We import and export the images from a database we manage. By 'static' I meant that the images do not change over time, so I want fixed URLs for them. Sorry for the confusion. Regards, Erik. lars vonk wrote: You could put Apache in front and let it serve you static images? Lars On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am looking for a way to serve many static images. It is important that I do not have to separately register them (as with SharedResources, as I understood) as there about 20.000 to 50.000 of them, and the set changes continuously. The most obvious thing that comes to mind is a static resource that takes parameters that are extracted from the URL (similar to Page). But I could not find such a thing. I am now considering implementing a servlet, but I'd rather stay within the framework. Regards, Erik. -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Shared resources with parameters?
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the whole resource thing is soo bloated. something we should simplify in 1.5. im all for getting rid of it entirely. we already have a nice interface for streams and that is called IRequestTarget, we already have that: SharedResourceRequestTarget - ResourceStreamRequestTarget just need to add a lastmodifiedtime() to it and we are done :) and it also gets rid of the inputstream-outputstream inconsistency. why should a resource provide an inputstream and us copy it when the resource can just dump it into the response directly... we already have that +/- also: IResourceStreamWriter But i agree it can be simpler But HEAD request should not go into the complete wicket cycle Those should be fast as possible. because head request are i think the happening the most of all the request. johan -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no but the params could contain a filename and against that you check the last modified time stamp also in the DB just also for performance, if we call: public abstract IResourceStream getResourceStream(); then dont already get all the data. Because that call can also just be used for lastModified() check. that should only lazy be done with the IResourceStream.getInputStream() call johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well, hopefully you dont instantiate the resource stream if its just a HEAD response... -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no do resource/this.getParameters() dont try to get the RequestCylce if it is a HEAD request (last modified check) it doesn't have to be there.. johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and inside the resource you do RequestCycle.get().getRequest().getParameter(foo); -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok just make such a class make a (Dynamic)Resource that you add to the shared resources That resource looks in the params to figure out what to serve with RequestCycle.urlFor(final ResourceReference resourceReference, ValueMap parameters) you can create urls with those params. called for example by ResourceLink or Image johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Lars, They are not that static :) We import and export the images from a database we manage. By 'static' I meant that the images do not change over time, so I want fixed URLs for them. Sorry for the confusion. Regards, Erik. lars vonk wrote: You could put Apache in front and let it serve you static images? Lars On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am looking for a way to serve many static images. It is important that I do not have to separately register them (as with SharedResources, as I understood) as there about 20.000 to 50.000 of them, and the set changes continuously. The most obvious thing that comes to mind is a static resource that takes parameters that are extracted from the URL (similar to Page). But I could not find such a thing. I am now considering implementing a servlet, but I'd rather stay within the framework. Regards, Erik. -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Re: Shared resources with parameters?
well, im saying get rid of Resource/ResourceStream entirely. we dont need that abstraction, we can just add whatever is missing to resource target. actually that way you can also implement page caching easily...maybe... anyways, irequesttarget.getlastmodified(pageparameters) can alleviate reliance on the request cycle -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the whole resource thing is soo bloated. something we should simplify in 1.5. im all for getting rid of it entirely. we already have a nice interface for streams and that is called IRequestTarget, we already have that: SharedResourceRequestTarget - ResourceStreamRequestTarget just need to add a lastmodifiedtime() to it and we are done :) and it also gets rid of the inputstream-outputstream inconsistency. why should a resource provide an inputstream and us copy it when the resource can just dump it into the response directly... we already have that +/- also: IResourceStreamWriter But i agree it can be simpler But HEAD request should not go into the complete wicket cycle Those should be fast as possible. because head request are i think the happening the most of all the request. johan -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no but the params could contain a filename and against that you check the last modified time stamp also in the DB just also for performance, if we call: public abstract IResourceStream getResourceStream(); then dont already get all the data. Because that call can also just be used for lastModified() check. that should only lazy be done with the IResourceStream.getInputStream() call johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well, hopefully you dont instantiate the resource stream if its just a HEAD response... -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no do resource/this.getParameters() dont try to get the RequestCylce if it is a HEAD request (last modified check) it doesn't have to be there.. johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and inside the resource you do RequestCycle.get().getRequest().getParameter(foo); -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok just make such a class make a (Dynamic)Resource that you add to the shared resources That resource looks in the params to figure out what to serve with RequestCycle.urlFor(final ResourceReference resourceReference, ValueMap parameters) you can create urls with those params. called for example by ResourceLink or Image johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Lars, They are not that static :) We import and export the images from a database we manage. By 'static' I meant that the images do not change over time, so I want fixed URLs for them. Sorry for the confusion. Regards, Erik. lars vonk wrote: You could put Apache in front and let it serve you static images? Lars On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am looking for a way to serve many static images. It is important that I do not have to separately register them (as with SharedResources, as I understood) as there about 20.000 to 50.000 of them, and the set changes continuously. The most obvious thing that comes to mind is a static resource that takes parameters that are extracted from the URL (similar to Page). But I could not find such a thing. I am now considering implementing a servlet, but I'd rather stay within the framework. Regards,
Re: Shared resources with parameters?
kill IResourceStream looks doable But also resource? Where does a ResourceReference then point to? How do we name the byte[] or streams? johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well, im saying get rid of Resource/ResourceStream entirely. we dont need that abstraction, we can just add whatever is missing to resource target. actually that way you can also implement page caching easily...maybe... anyways, irequesttarget.getlastmodified(pageparameters) can alleviate reliance on the request cycle -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the whole resource thing is soo bloated. something we should simplify in 1.5. im all for getting rid of it entirely. we already have a nice interface for streams and that is called IRequestTarget, we already have that: SharedResourceRequestTarget - ResourceStreamRequestTarget just need to add a lastmodifiedtime() to it and we are done :) and it also gets rid of the inputstream-outputstream inconsistency. why should a resource provide an inputstream and us copy it when the resource can just dump it into the response directly... we already have that +/- also: IResourceStreamWriter But i agree it can be simpler But HEAD request should not go into the complete wicket cycle Those should be fast as possible. because head request are i think the happening the most of all the request. johan -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no but the params could contain a filename and against that you check the last modified time stamp also in the DB just also for performance, if we call: public abstract IResourceStream getResourceStream(); then dont already get all the data. Because that call can also just be used for lastModified() check. that should only lazy be done with the IResourceStream.getInputStream() call johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well, hopefully you dont instantiate the resource stream if its just a HEAD response... -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no do resource/this.getParameters() dont try to get the RequestCylce if it is a HEAD request (last modified check) it doesn't have to be there.. johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and inside the resource you do RequestCycle.get().getRequest().getParameter(foo); -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok just make such a class make a (Dynamic)Resource that you add to the shared resources That resource looks in the params to figure out what to serve with RequestCycle.urlFor(final ResourceReference resourceReference, ValueMap parameters) you can create urls with those params. called for example by ResourceLink or Image johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Lars, They are not that static :) We import and export the images from a database we manage. By 'static' I meant that the images do not change over time, so I want fixed URLs for them. Sorry for the confusion. Regards, Erik. lars vonk wrote: You could put Apache in front and let it serve you static images? Lars On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am looking for a way to serve many static images. It is important that I do not have to separately register them (as with SharedResources, as I understood) as there about 20.000 to 50.000 of them, and the set changes continuously. The
Re: Shared resources with parameters?
well, these are all the questions we would have to answer when we are looking into this in detail. i dont have the answers right now, im just stating what i would like to see happen. i think the entire resource api has become very very bloated and can be simplified. -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: kill IResourceStream looks doable But also resource? Where does a ResourceReference then point to? How do we name the byte[] or streams? johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well, im saying get rid of Resource/ResourceStream entirely. we dont need that abstraction, we can just add whatever is missing to resource target. actually that way you can also implement page caching easily...maybe... anyways, irequesttarget.getlastmodified(pageparameters) can alleviate reliance on the request cycle -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the whole resource thing is soo bloated. something we should simplify in 1.5. im all for getting rid of it entirely. we already have a nice interface for streams and that is called IRequestTarget, we already have that: SharedResourceRequestTarget - ResourceStreamRequestTarget just need to add a lastmodifiedtime() to it and we are done :) and it also gets rid of the inputstream-outputstream inconsistency. why should a resource provide an inputstream and us copy it when the resource can just dump it into the response directly... we already have that +/- also: IResourceStreamWriter But i agree it can be simpler But HEAD request should not go into the complete wicket cycle Those should be fast as possible. because head request are i think the happening the most of all the request. johan -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no but the params could contain a filename and against that you check the last modified time stamp also in the DB just also for performance, if we call: public abstract IResourceStream getResourceStream(); then dont already get all the data. Because that call can also just be used for lastModified() check. that should only lazy be done with the IResourceStream.getInputStream() call johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well, hopefully you dont instantiate the resource stream if its just a HEAD response... -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no do resource/this.getParameters() dont try to get the RequestCylce if it is a HEAD request (last modified check) it doesn't have to be there.. johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and inside the resource you do RequestCycle.get().getRequest().getParameter(foo); -igor On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok just make such a class make a (Dynamic)Resource that you add to the shared resources That resource looks in the params to figure out what to serve with RequestCycle.urlFor(final ResourceReference resourceReference, ValueMap parameters) you can create urls with those params. called for example by ResourceLink or Image johan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Lars, They are not that static :) We import and export the images from a database we manage. By 'static' I meant that the images do not change over time, so I want fixed URLs for them. Sorry for the confusion. Regards, Erik. lars vonk wrote:
